Swing Voters Deliver Harsh Verdict

You build a voter base with a presidential campaign because that's the only way people actually hear of you. "Govern at the local level" is the sort of thing people say that sounds kind of good but actually means best-case scenario you maybe get yourself better known in a rather small area. At least the presidential attempts get attention which could help elect people on the lower levels, which some third parties have managed. But again this was done by starting high and going lower, not starting at the lowest level and climbing up. I've never seen anyone who claims they have to go from the local level first ever able to point to any case of success of this. If this is the proper way to go, why is there no apparent evidence it can work?

Indeed, the last time a third party candidate managed a big win was Jesse Ventura when he won Minnesota as the Reform Party candidate, a party that started on the national level rather than the local one (it collapsed soon afterwards, though, because it turns out that Ross Perot: The Party doesn't work so well when Ross Perot quits). And the last time a party rose up and became a major force in American politics was when the Republican Party became a thing, which again didn't start on the local level, it worked much more nationally.

Maybe,whichever way someone goes (starting nationally or locally) won't work and there's not any real route to becoming a major force in American politics under the current voting system aside from one of the current major parties imploding; the Republican Party became a major force largely because the Whig Party (the major opponent to the Democrats back then) collapsed from internal division on the issue of slavery and the Republican Party, many of whose members were former Whig members, therefore took its place. But I've noticed that whatever little success third parties have managed has all been from those who worked nationally to try to gain attention and then used that to win some more local contests, not any that worked locally and tried to rise up.
There’s a reason parties are never formed during “good times”.
Upvote 0

Donald Trump indicted by Manhattan grand jury

Apparently, it doesn't seem like it would have been. Given that Trump's supporters seem more than willing to go to any lengths to excuse any and all of the crimes he's been accused of, and didn't even bat an eye when the Access Hollywood clip came out, seems having an affair wouldn't have even remotely been a problem for them
I seem to recall that Trump won becuase of about 70,000 votes spread across several states, such a story might’ve cost him the Amish vote?
Upvote 0

Yet Again, At Planet Fitness...

Sure.


Actually, there is evidence that suggests brain chemistry more closely matches gender identity instead of biological sex, among transgender individuals.

Let's assume that's true....

If someone claimed to be trans and their "brain chemistry" doesn't match the biological sex they claim it does...

Would you deny that person's claim of being trans?

Edit- never mind. This is a study of 24 men, 24 women, and 24 "trans women".

It's a garbage study with no sample size worth considering.
Upvote 0

Four Passages

Hey, thanks for the compliments. Sorry. I am not Greek (so many people here post Greek or Hebrew words here, and it gets on my nerves, as it make me feel like they are pretentious, hopefully that does not rub off on you in the wrong way).
I totally agree. I don't like that at all or I should say I only do such once in a blue moon. When people have a habit of doing that are they so interested in really wanting to be sincere in teaching one or is it rather a trick to use in order to seek to impress. Half the time I've seen they're stretching the meaning of what the Greek says it has to mean anyway.
Upvote 0

Contempt For Ordinary Voters Undermines Opposition To Trump

It's called watching and listening to the people inside the big cities. I trust the words of people more than I trust data from a government which has failed to be factually accurate too many times.
The links you were given were to Pew. Guess who they ask to get their figures on people's opinions. Yeah, it's Joe and Jill Citizen. So I dunno, maybe you did the same and selected a cross section of people in a big city and rang them up and asked them. Maybe you went door to door. Or maybe what you actually did was read a few opinion pieces from people with an agenda who tell you lies to try and convince you that they are right.

My guess is that you want to believe them because it fits in with what you'd prefer to believe. And trust me, that's the easiest way to get fooled. People telling you exactly what you want to hear.

So why not spend a little time and investigate for yourself. Look for something that backs up your view. Look for something solid that we can discuss. 'Cos quite frankly, it ain't called 'watching and listening' (which in itself if you actually did it, is only relying an anecdotal evidence). What it really is is forming opinions that themselves are based on opinions that themselves are based on lies.
Upvote 0

Bill Barr Triggers CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, Won’t Back Down on Voting For Trump

Collins' response was so childish. How could he possibly vote for the person he thinks is better if that person made fun of him? She sounded like a high school girl.
“Dear future Chief Justice Barr, I might say mean things about you but we’re tight, right?” was probably never typed by anyone before this.
Upvote 0

Christian assaulted for reading Bible aloud, so cops arrest him!!

Well, most cops are nice people, it is always the bad ones that make the news. In recent years, there has been a growing narrative that the news portrays police officers in an unfavorable light, often depicting them as violent and brutal. This perception is largely due to the way news stories about police encounters are reported in the media. It's essential to understand that while there are instances of police brutality, they represent a small fraction of the overall number of interactions between law enforcement and citizens. The vast majority of police officers are friendly, nonviolent individuals who genuinely care about their communities. They go above and beyond their duty to help people in need and build positive relationships with the public.

So, @Vambram was correct, cos the cops in the OP's posted article are bad apples, and they should have never mistreated or allowed for the mistreatment of the street preacher. Single digit percentages of cops are bad apples, though not many studies have been done: Study: Removing 'bad apples' from police forces unlikely to significantly reduce use-of-force complaints
Perhaps you’ve misinterpreted the acronym?

If a person does the (police) job that they’re paid to do, perfectly, then it’s almost la prerequisite.

We (as a society) have to redefine the job we ask police to do, because right now it almost requires ACAB.

It’s not the “bad apples”, fault, it’s the job/system that turns them.
Upvote 0

Justice Thomas raised crucial question about legitimacy of special counsel's prosecution of Trump

Just like the judge in the so-called "hush money" trial recused himself, right??
Judge Merchan made a $35 donation. Gunny Thomas was collaborating with those being indicted in Arizona, Michigan, Georgia, etc. for criminally attempting to overturn the election.
She might even be an "unindicted co-conspirator," a perk of being married to a judge on the take.
Upvote 0

BIDEN “RED FLAGS” EVANGELICALS

A poster was equating supposed policy positions held by biden with morality and I don't think that's a reasonable comparison.
To you, the differences I listed are merely policy positions. However, for me, what I listed previously are what I believe are immoral practices and beliefs by the leaders of the progressive left in the Democratic Party.
Upvote 0

More than half of Americans support mass deportations of illegal migrants: poll

Nobody emigrates from Utopia.
But tell me, what paradises these folks are from that the US of A is a “heck hole”?
Elsewhere we have a “declining birthrate” thread; pretty soon we will be inviting immigrants in, to run things while we take our SOMA!
I am not sure how this relates to anything I wrote...

Thanks tho!
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

The Strong's Deception

@Laureate , I was recently watching the third podcast in the series, 'The Christian Roots of the Jewish Faith' again. It is entitled, "The Aramaic "Onkelos" is not a Literal translation! | Part 3 | Case for Messiah" <= Click on this link and watch the first 7 minutes. Then tell me what the Masorets thought of their own translation of Torah.

Yahudim the presentation you linked has nothing to do with the Masorete or the Mesorah, it is a comparison of the Targum with the LXX, the Targum (aka Onkelos) is a particular Paraphrasal of the Torah, (that does not quite measure up to a Translation), accompanied by Talmudic Commentary;

Neither is there any Masorete offering any opinion concerning the two books.
Upvote 0

More than half of Americans support mass deportations of illegal migrants: poll

My guess it not only Americans would support deportation of illegal immigrants, so would almost every country in the world. Many countries are in favor of welcoming immigrants that come to the country legally, but I can't image illegal immigration is popular anywhere.
Two thirds of the lands west of the Mississippi are underpopulated, but we got “no more room”?
Upvote 0

Noah-Lots of Water in the Oceans and Subterranean Oceans

Perhaps you don't know what "nephesh" means.


Nephesh (נֶ֫פֶשׁ‎ nép̄eš) is a Biblical Hebrew word which occurs in the Hebrew Bible.
"Nephesh (נֶ֫פֶשׁ‎ nép̄eš) is a Biblical Hebrew word which occurs in the Hebrew Bible....

..." In Genesis 2:7, the text is not that Adam was given
a nephesh but that Adam "became a living nephesh."

"There is no term in English corresponding to nephesh"

per you post.

P.S.

You seem to be good with science, and know the bible.
That is why I was wondering if you could look over my posts in another
thread [not mine] for review. No one has commented on it yet.

I know the bible is not a science book, but it does mention many
things about Gods creation that are in science books today.

It deals with things mentioned in the bible, and a science point of view.
Please feel free to comment what you think about the comparison.

It starts, in the beginning

I really do not like to argue about anything, especially about Gods
creation with brothers in Christ. Just looking for a scientist review.
If you do comment, please comment in that thread. Thanks
Upvote 0

More than half of Americans support mass deportations of illegal migrants: poll

Or to the politicians who invite them to our country for political purposes, knowing that they will suffer poverty and underclass status for generations?
Nobody emigrates from Utopia.
But tell me, what paradises these folks are from that the US of A is a “heck hole”?
Elsewhere we have a “declining birthrate” thread; pretty soon we will be inviting immigrants in, to run things while we take our SOMA!
Upvote 0

Biblical Evidence For 31 AD Crucifixion

Ok, going to give you more education on the Barley. Review the following and understand why the March Barley is acceptable for the wave offering.

I don't have to read anything that disputes the biblical era calendar. The math that I've shown proves that I've rediscovered the correct metonic cycle that the observational calendar was based on. If you haven't even watched the material, I have no more use in responding to ignorant posts like yours.
Upvote 0

I’ve never done this…

for my will, and not much for his will
God knows a lot better than we do what is best for us. God does provide abundantly above and beyond all we could ever ask or think. He does not change so He is the one that is waiting on us. So He can accomplish His plan and purpose in our life. I just pray thy will be done as Jesus teaches us. We should look at the Lords prayer so we know how to pray.
Upvote 0

Truckers rail against new EPA rules mandating transition to ‘useless’ EV big rigs

After the failure of the VC summer and the money pit that was Vogle no company is going to take the risk of build new nuclear plants.
It’s looks like companies are going to be begging the government to just build the nuclear infrastructure itself and let them run things, the perfect fusion of government/capitalism. (Socialize the risk, privatize the “rewards”.)
It’s customary to give references when quoting others work.
I’m pretty sure that that’s from the OP article, but don’t know since, yes, no linkie.
Upvote 0

WW III Already Begun

I completely agree. Bad as things are, they could be much, much worse. I'm in no hurry to see "the end times". I do, however, think we're already making such a mess of things, our only hope is His return.
From my perspective ain’t no-One coming, if we end up being the end of ourselves…hey, we had a good run.
Going back to terminology though, warfare has changed its' appearance from the 20th Century. I waver between thinking we're already in WW3 to thinking there will never be anything called that. Additionally, I don't know from where do I have the idea that "end times" and WW3 are the same thing.
World War III has not happened largely because of this fact.
If enough people decide that they’d survive better than their enemies, it’ll be much more likely.
Upvote 0

From Gods Tables of Stone to the Fleshy Tables in our Hearts

I quote verses to show a revival of law keeping was done by these two OT figures.

As for switching something around? I am not sure what you mean yet about me "switching" something around.
It seems a oft repeated theme from some brothers that ALL Jesus did as a Savior was provide an forgiveness.
Now of course eternal redemption supplies forgiveness of all offenses His salvation includes much more with that.

My comparison of Jesus with Ezra and Hezekiah are meant to derive from you what the work of Christ
accomplishes besides this forgiveness. The New Testament teaches a fuller salvation of Christ living in man
furnishesing the forgiven with the power of divine life unto righteousness.

There is "much more" beyond jusrtification to being saved in the whole realm of His indwelling life.
For if we, being enemies, were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more we will be saved in His life, having been reconciled, (Rom. 5:10)

As this Person is planted within us and allowed to grow, spread, saturate, and fill our soul we await subjectively "the gift of righteousness."
much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ. (v.17b)

To reign in life through this indwelling grace is the anticpated work of the Savior.
I notice some seem to limit "Savior" only to forgiveness such that we may resume the vain effort of
law keeping through our own inept striving.

To me that makes the Son of God's work just the same as a law keeping revival led by godly
men of the OT like Hezekiah the king or Ezra the scribe.


That is the utterance of God's apostle and one of the oracles of God. It does not say Christ did away with the morality of
the law of God. It says certain commandments in ordinances were done away by Him on the cross to create in Himself
one new man.

Three major commandments in ordinances as an example were three pillars of Judaism -
Circumcision - nailed to the cross and done away.
Holy diet - nailed to the cross and done away.
Sabbath keeping - nailed to the cross and done away.

These three ordinances were three impenetral requiresments which kept the enmity between Jews and Gentles.

But "the righteous requirement" of the morality (not ritual ordinance) of the law is fulfilled when we learn
to walk by the indwelling Spirit of Christ resting from our own religious strivings.

That the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the spirit. (Rom. 8:4)


The word of God says Christ did so. Where is your faith that He did?
We can be crucified with Christ. No?
We can be buried with Christ.
We can be raised with Christ.
We cab be seated with Christ.

We should stand on faith and equally believe "Lord Jesus, Praise You that You nailed to your cross the commandments in ordinances.
Halelujah! Lord Jesus I believe that You have created in Yourself one new man, making peace, breaking down the middle

wall of partition caused by the written commandments in ordinances. What a Savior You are Lord Jesus, our life, our peace."

I don't want to fight against His work saying Colossians 2:14 is impossible.
That is too natural minded. That is too carnal minded and immature.


That is another commandment in ordinances terminated in Christ's work on the cross - the need for the blood
of animal sacrifices.

But you should not restrict this terminating work to blood sacrifices.
Colossians explains other ordinances have become nullified in Christ as well.

Let no one therefore judge you in eating and in drinking or in respect of a feast or of a new moon or of the Sabbath,
Which are a shadow of the things to come, but the body is of Christ.

Let no one defraud you by judging you unworthy of your prize, in self-chosen lowliness and the worship of the angels, dwelling on the things which he has seen, vainly puffed up by his mind set on the flesh, (Col. 2:16-18)

You see more than just the sacrificial offerings are mentioned. Also mentioned are new moon, Sabbath, the eating and drinking certain holy dietary ordinances.

They were shadows pointing to the body of the shadows as a reality - the Person and work of the Son of God.
We are to be rooted in His life and walk in His life.

No one can judge us proclaiming we are second hand Christians because we do not do Sabbaths, new moon feasts, or legally adhere
to the holy diet. These ordinances in the handwriting of the law were nailed to the cross by Christ when He gave Himself on Calvary.


Christ CAN do what we CANNOT do. And I believe the New Testament.

Wiping out the handwriting in ordinances, which was against us, which was contrary to us; and He has taken it out of the way, nailing it to the cross. (Col. 2:14)

Angel worship - terminated
Asceticism - terminated.

In there place we hold to the living Person who is the Head supplying divine life for the growing of His Body with the growth of God.
From this prize of an indwelling living Savior we should not be defrauded or robbed of enjoyment.

Let no one defraud you by judging you unworthy of your prize, in self-chosen lowliness and the worship of the angels, dwelling on the things which he has seen, vainly puffed up by his mind set on the flesh,

And not holding the Head, out from whom all the Body, being richly supplied and knit together by means of the joints and sinews, grows with the growth of God.

If you died with Christ from the elements of the world, why, as living in the world, do you subject yourselves to ordinances: (Col. 2:18-20)
The 10 commandments are not ordinances. Never does the Bible call them that. You keep on reading ordinances into commandments. My mind is not Set on the flesh. The works of the flesh are the violation of the 10.

Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

I am focusing on the fruit of the Spirit which violates no law. That includes the 10 commandments.

Galatians 5: 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.

Your basic premise is that sin is more powerful than God. It isn't. It's the product of a finite being therefore an infinite God is infinitely more powerful than sin. He can and does overcome it.

I went from a drug addict and alcoholic despised by my entire family to drug and alcohol free for the last 3 decades. I was so psychologically addicted to pot I would walk down the street and just smell the odor of pot smoke on someone's breath or clothing and I would get all the physical symptoms of being stoned.

The rejection by my entire family was harder to get over but I'm past it. I'm able to make close friend now and rather quickly. There are miracles that happen from knowing God. And I live with full assurance of salvation and a clear conscience.. That is what God wants to do for each of us, but it's impossible for Him to do for those who don't believe it is possible to overcome sin and it's scars.
Upvote 0

Yet Again, At Planet Fitness...

Yeah, that's a pretty good example...the circular definition.

The more annoying one imo typically goes like...

Left- gender is a set of clothing, behaviors, social/cultural norms, and personal feelings
Us- when women wear suits and pants and men wear drag....those are transgender people?
Left- well no...but they can be...
Us- when men decide to become nurses and women do math or leave the kitchen...those are transgender people?
Left- well no...but they can be....
Us- then we must be talking about personal feelings?
Left- but it's more than that....
Us- what more?
Left- gender is a set of clothing, behaviors, social/cultural norms, and personal feelings
Us- are you having stroke?

That one is also a circular loop.

You haven't answered any of my questions. The only thing you have done is post a definition form Oxford dictionary. The dictionary actually affirmed that gender always refers to sex. And you failed to explain how gender differs from sex. Please give us a post number where you explained the difference between gender and sex.

You've also failed to define woman.

Here's how it usually goes.

Us- Whats gender?
Left- it's an identity
Us- Of what
Left- Of what they feel like
Us- Feel like what?
Left- their gender
Us- what gender
Left- what they feel like
Us- A man feels like a woman?
Left-yes
Us- you mean like biological woman
Left- no the female gender
Us- what's female gender
Left-an identity

And on it goes. No definition of gender is ever offered. It's all a big circle. And you have done the same thing. Made a claim that you explained it and when asked to point it out you can't.

Another big fail.
How to say you're not interested in listening to the other point of view without actually saying you aren't interested in listening to the other point of view.


No definition of gender is ever offered.

gender​

(noun)
the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.​

Sound familiar?

-- A2SG, pay attention to the bolded part, don't stop reading after the first comma....
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,840,621
Messages
64,786,883
Members
273,596
Latest member
KE1220