Anti-Muslim Bigotry Directed at Mamdani
- By RileyG
- American Politics
- 107 Replies
This! You beat me to itNext he will mandate teaching them they need Dihydrogen Monoxide to survive!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This! You beat me to itNext he will mandate teaching them they need Dihydrogen Monoxide to survive!
Note: Apparently, Ada Maria Isasi Diaz was a Cuban Catholic involved with Liberation theology. She was controversial because she ministered to her nephew's same-sex wedding at a Unitarian Church and supported the ordination of women in the Catholic Church. She died relatively young at 69. Hmmm.....In some progressive circles of Christianity in the United States, the term "Kin-dom" has become increasingly used in recent decades as another name for "Kingdom," as in "God's Kin-dom" or "the Kin-dom of Jesus."
At the United Methodist Church General Conference held last year, for example, openly lesbian Bishop Karen Oliveto preached a sermon to delegates that referenced the phrase.
In an article published last month, Presbyterian News Service, the news outlet of the Presbyterian Church (USA), quoted a pastor who spoke of "standing on the kin-dom side of history."
But where does the term come from, and why was it created?
The first confirmed use of the term came from Catholic modernist theologian Ada Maria Isasi Diaz, a theological liberal who spoke of the concept in a 1996 book titled Mujerista Theology: A Theology for the Twenty-first Century.
The phrase has gained popularity among those who seek what they believe is a less patriarchal or imperial description of the Kingdom of God.
Continued below.
![]()
What is God’s ‘Kin-dom’?
A look into the origins of the term Kin-dom and the dispute over its validitywww.christianpost.com
His supporters loveSo, nothing has come of this blatant corruption. What a surprise.


That would probably help the faithful. Sigh.He should ask Pope Leo for an extension to parishes that celebrated the Latin Mass.
Yep, that's why it was so popular among Americans. People were finally able to get life saving operations and treatment, which they couldn't receive before the ACA. Republicans tried to kill Obamacare, over and over, but voters rebelled and Republicans knew they had to keep it.Obamacare iis a failure ....
And Republicans will answer as they did this time. NO, NO, NO. In the mean time, people will be losing their coverage.besides that the CR extends keeping the government for a short period of time .... they can fight the insurance battle then
I made it clear in #11, that the destruction of the AC, is done by Jesus at His Return.So the antiChrist is destroyed with a large mass of sunspot activity? Is this where you want to go?
Jesus didn't come to save us in our sin ... but from our sin. None of us are perfect ... but ... with the help from the Holy Spirit we can and should see progress (overcoming sin)1 John 1:8-10
8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us.
1 John 3:6-10
6 No one who lives in him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has either seen him or known him. 7 Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. The one who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. 8 The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work. 9 No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because they have been born of God. 10 This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not God’s child, nor is anyone who does not love their brother and sister.
I read this last night after a weekend of heavy drinking and eating.
This is not a habitual thing for me. I have drank less than 10 times this year but I have been struggling with overeating due to heavy restriction of calories, since the beginning of this year, in an effort to lose weight.
I have lost about 50 pounds and am only 10 pounds away from goal weight. But, the stress of it all (turning away all social engagements, business engagements, family time etc) causes me to overeat when I start to eat any sugary foods and drinking magnifies the craves and reduces all inhibition and self-control.
So, to my way of thinking, I am not only drinking to excess but then engaging in gluttony, or self sabotage or, I don't really know 100% what the exact sin would be but the action of drinking too much and then overeating seems sinful. Also, I don't view these things as glorifying God or being a light to unbelievers (my family) so it would seem to me that I am indeed sinning.
In an effort to understand, I read the above verses last night.
With regards to 1 John 1:8-10, I believe I am a sinner, have confessed my sins, asked for forgiveness and accepted Jesus Christ as my Lord and savior.
With regards to 1 John 3:6-10, sin is of the devil, and 'No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because they have been born of God. 10 This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are,'
Am I truly saved then if I continue to sin? Am I sinning? I have prayed and acknowledged that I'm not sure about either of these points but, really, I am sure I am saved because I have done what the Bible says saves us according to Romans 10:9-13:
9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. 11 As Scripture says, “Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame.”[e] 12 For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, 13 for, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”[f]
Any and all help is appreciated. On one hand, I feel broken hearted. I certainly do not want to be of the devil and I want to live my life for Christ and have assurance that I will be with Him when the time comes. On the other hand, I feel like I'm misunderstanding something and overreacting. On the other hand, I feel like I could want that to be the case because the consequences are devastating and I wouldn't know what the point of anything was anymore...
If you could help me, I would be forever grateful, thank you and God bless.
Bible Prophecy clearly says there will be a new Temple in Jerusalem.Rebuilding some temple in the middle east would be a blasphemy!
How do you refer to Sirach, in the context of Bible Study? No, I'm not going to both to look at the link.Really like the book of Sirach, made a video with my own commentary talking about some specific verses.
Youtube video here
"Note that Vance has not suggested coercion or ultimatum. In fact, he has explicitly rejected force, saying, “But if she doesn't, then God says everybody has free will, and so that doesn't cause a problem for me.”A debate has erupted online and in Indian social circles worldwide. The subject is U.S. Vice President JD Vance, who has been criticized for hoping that his Hindu wife, Usha, might one day share his Christian faith.
To right-wing Hindu extremists and left-wing elites, this is exaggerated as an act of war — proselytization, cultural assault, a colonial echo. The outrage is loud and the accusations swift. Yet beneath the noise lies a profound misunderstanding, not only of JD Vance, but of Christianity itself.
At a TPUSA event and in subsequent social media commentary, Vance spoke about his spiritual journey. When asked about Usha, a brilliant attorney raised in a Hindu home, he offered this reflection: “Do I hope, eventually, that she is somehow moved by the same thing that I was moved in by church? Yeah, honestly, I do wish that … I hope she may one day see things as I do."
Note that Vance has not suggested coercion or ultimatum. In fact, he has explicitly rejected force, saying, “But if she doesn't, then God says everybody has free will, and so that doesn't cause a problem for me.”
This is not proselytization. It is love, the kind Jesus modeled. Conversion in Christian theology is not a human transaction but a spiritual encounter. Jesus warned against forcing faith; in the Parable of the Sower, some seeds take root and others do not. Growth cannot be commanded.
Vance understands this truth. His critics do not.
Continued below.
![]()
JD Vance, his Hindu wife and Christian conversion: Indian uproar
The contradiction is glaring Hinduism can export, but Christianity must not importwww.christianpost.com
And on that you and I are in full agreement.You are quoting Article VI of the 39 Articles of religion, and I am citing my favourite part of the article on the Anglican Compass website (linked in my OP).
Of the 39 Articles - II refers to "The Son, which is the Word of the Father," which does not even call the Bible God's word, but Jesus. XX refers to "God’s Word written," and VI which you have quoted above refers to the sufficiency of "Holy Scriptures" for salvation. That the Bible is available to all in a language they can readily understand means a lot to the Anglican church, but as far as I am aware claims to Biblical inerrancy are not part of our tradition, no.