• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why Zohran Mamdani won and New York will pay a terrible price

The cops have to protect the public and usually get involved with a mentally sick person first.
That's my point. Cops don't always HAVE TO be involved with a "mentally sick" person first.

After arrest is made, then
the person can be handed over to professionals to determine if they are truly mentally ill or not.
You may be surprised to learn that just because someone is having a psychotic episode does not mean they will be arrested.

Telling cops to handle it differently comes from people who know nothing about stopping a violent crime or
arresting a person. This was proven in the George Floyd case where a cop just doing his job was convicted and
has been stabbed in prison by inmates who have a hatred for cops.
The bitter irony of this is off the chart. To call Floyd's arrest "de-regure" is not offensive so much as stupid. There has been no indication from any police body that having his knee on his neck was necessary. The mere fact that you are totally unaware of the rules of engagement around force for police officers is clear that you have no idea what you're arguing, talking about, or even viewing on TV.


If you're not going to address my point and just keep repeating what you've already said you're not a part of a "discussion".
Upvote 0

The NEA is pushing far left teaching upon children

I like the idea that empathy is bad (well, I think it's funny because the meaning has been twisted so that if you show kindness to sinners, you are bad).

Because I think for certain people, any time they have to consider anyone but themselves they are put upon.

The mere tolerance of their existance is ALMOST enough to break them. And heaven forbid we introduce their existance to children. A grade 3 kid reading a story about a girl with lesbian moms? A story about how a young black girl can't just go to any hair shop to get a hair cut?

Why should my summer child have to be confronted with such inappropriate book learnin!?
Upvote 0

The Reality of Free Will

It's all up to us, yes. You are right on that point.
We all have the choice to do, or not to do... As you repeatedly quoted... Deuteronomy 30:19
Joshua, who succeeded Moses, told the people, "if it is unpleasing in your sight to serve the LORD, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve... As for me and my house[hold], we will serve the LORD!” Joshua 24:15
Pretty simple and straightforward. No one is forced, but freely, and willingly make a decision.

Joshua’s Stipulation​

  • In Joshua 24:15, Joshua says: “If it seems evil to you to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve…”
  • Notice the stipulation: the “choice” only exists for those who think serving God is evil.
  • For Joshua himself, there is no choice — “As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”
  • This means the “choice” is not a neutral free will option, but a testimony of heart orientation.
    • Those who see God as wicked presume they have alternatives.
    • Those who love God see no alternative — serving Him is the only reality.
  • Love
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Are the Jews Israel, or is the church Israel? Or does it depend on the context of the passage?

I have been doing this 40 years,
Which proves that people can be wrong for at least 40 years.

I understand the difference between the holy spirts voice and Satan's lies.
Doesn't seem like it to me.

Anytime I see people who can not understand God's SIMPLE TIMING PATTERNS, I get leery. Not understanding these deeper truths leads people down wrong paths, and then they teach others these same errors. Yet these types refuse to listen to those of us who present the facts, its always the message board warriors or the Mormon/JW types that go down these roads.

No matter how its presented, even when it overcomes their own take on things, they jut forge ahead, eyes closed, these types can't see because they chose not to see. As per anything secret, its only secret TO YOU GUYS. God writes in ways the average joe CAN NOT SEE on purpose. Jesus stated he spoke in parables so the world hearing they would not hear and seeing would not see. So, why didn't Israel understand the Old Testament Bible that foretold Jesus' coming as a sacrifice? Because they did not WANT TO SEE IT !! Its in there, but in God's own way He forces us to dig these truths out, NOTICE, nowhere does it say on Dec. 25 (just an example we do not know what day he was born on) year 03 at 7 AM that Yeshua will be born. WHY? According to you guys that is how God must write things down, same excuse the Pharisees and Nicodemus gave. The Old Man in the temple saw baby Jesus and he knew but HOW? The wise men knew. The scripture says Yeshua will be born in Bethlehem, it says "My son" will come out of Egypt, how can both be true? Did God confused the Pharisees on purpose? No, that is how He writes, you call it "SECRET" but its not, you just refuse to hear these factoids because God refuses IT spell it out in a manner you think He should. Psstt, He wants you to dig it out, and you are too busy locked into your own understanding, just as the Pharisees were, MOST PEOPLE ARE, so Nicodemus asks how can a man be born again? Which he of course refused to believe.
Blah blah blah. It's quite telling that you just ramble on and on without ever making a meaningful point that applies to anyone here.

Its not even hard, to those who will open their minds and investigate all of the pertinent facts. Revelation is hard, the Simple Pre Trib. Rapture is not, that is easy stuff, their can be no other timing, period, nothing else even remotely fits.
LOL. Yeah, Jesus saying that the elect will be gathered AFTER the tribulation of those days (Matt 24:29-31, Mark 13:24-27) doesn't even remotely fit. Okay then.... LOL.

That is NOT CORRECT, the After THIS is speaking about the Church Age. The THINGS WHICH YOU HAVE SEEN is talking about the Supernatural Glory of Jesus' Eternal Godhead and Splendor. The THINGS WHCH ARE can only mean the Church Age. The Hereafter can only mean after he Church Age. You denying these facts will not change these facts brother. We know when the transition happens because we see it happen in real time in Rev. 4:1
Total nonsense. The church is referenced several times after that.

Revelation 12:17 Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring—those who keep God’s commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus.

Who else but the church are "those who keep God’s commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus."?

Revelation 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.

Who else but the church are "the saints"?

Romans 1:7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Corinthians 1:2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their's and our's:


Revelation 14:12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. 13 And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labours; and their works do follow them.

Who else but those in the church are "they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."? Who else are "in the Lord" except for the church?
Upvote 0

Do you keep the Sabbath? (poll)

Regarding Mark7:19 this is what was in the original transcripts

καθαρίζων πάντα τὰ βρώματα
Katharizōn panta ta brōmata
Literally: "cleansing all foods"

The phrase modifies the digestion process, not food laws.
You kidding right? I thought I had heard it all. First you claim that it was an addition but when I point you to the codex Sinaiticus and you realize your error, you now invent some other excuse to continue trying to put the Mosaic law back on the Christian’s back. There is absolutely nothing in this verse about digestion. The food laws are gone just like the rest of the Mosaic law.

Secondly, you still have not posted a verse that shows that the Mosaic law was given to the gentiles.
Upvote 0

What is the meaning of Total Depravity?

Right, they either never turned to Him to begin with, or they've turned back away from Him, failing to remain, returning to the flesh.
Those who fail to "remain," never really turned in the first place.
It was a false move.
They were never good soil.
Those, however, who persevere to the end, producing the good fruit of overcoming sin and doing good, will prove themselves to have been good soil.
Yes, they will persevere to the end because they are good soil.

The persevering does not make the soil good.

The good soil makes the persevering.
Upvote 0

Joe Biden Loses Cool When Asked Question

As to Trump, he always was a boor. But that’s OK these days I guess.
You downplay his actions and call it merely boorish, I'll call it fascistic when a single leader is demanding complete unchecked power while siccing the military on his own constituents and using his crypto coin grifts as slush funds for dark money and foreign government bribery, among a myriad of other crimes.

America will never live down not putting this man in prison. Even Brazil surpassed America in terms of being a functional democracy.

Right now in the GOP there is a debate whether neo nazis can be in the party.

Your predictions? We’ll see how they age.
Maybe you missed the sarcasm indicator denoting the facetious nature of my comment but would you like you an actual prediction?
Upvote 0

I currently have assurance, but how long will it last?

We will have to agree to disagree. OCD experts and OCD sufferers say that that is not true of people with religious OCD. I have done a fair amount of reading about religious OCD. Even with biblical logic on the side of their salvation, Christians with OCD are in a storm of doubt that can take years of hard work to overcome.
Yeah, the addition of mental illness can definitely complicate questions like this. I still routinely find myself having to fight off spirals at times due to my bipolar 1.
Upvote 0

What were your expectations as a new Christian?

Looking to get a little more insight from multiple people from multiple backgrounds on this. Thank you in advance to anyone who responds.
I started as Catholic, then got "saved" in a missionary servicemen's outreach chapel. Then I fell from my so-called faith as I was so busy with mainly criticizing everybody, Christians or not. Then I got into a mess and thought of the thief on the cross, how he only knew he needed Jesus and to trust in Jesus, and Jesus would know what to do with me. And since then I have trusted God to makes me submissive to Him so at each moment I can discover what He does with me. So, in case I became a Christian by getting into more ongoing personal submission to Jesus, here is what I have been discovering >
-When you first became a Christian, what did you expect life in the church to be like?
I understood that there are people to help me, and I need to be ready to love and deal with ones who are not being good to me. Because Jesus expects us to love any and all people >

"And I will very gladly spend and be spent for your souls; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I am loved." (2 Corinthians 12:15)

Love and give and help without requiring anything in return, I understood Jesus to mean. And in case I was refused somewhere . . . leave them and discover what God does with me.
-What were your hopes or assumptions about how things would go?
The ones who are Christian would be good with me, and others would not and were there for me to reach them for Jesus. And Jesus says God is in control of what happens to me, and God takes care of me.
-What was your first experience with the church community?
If "first" was the missionary church, I was glad to be able to give testimonies and invite people to church so they could be saved. And the people were pretty good to me, but warning me not to be so critical and showing off.

If my real conversion was the thief on the cross approach . . . then I went with a lot of churches that I pretty much integrated by being there. And I had a chance to discover how each group could have people who were not right but others were with it and my good examples of how I need to worship God and relate in love. Then I went homeless, on purpose, and discovered outreach people who could be different ways, and in various churches I visited on foot from Boston to North Carolina it was pretty much the same: the functional church of Jesus is honorable and good in example, wherever Jesus sheep are, while church culture people can be a problem, but are there to be reached for Jesus.
-Did those expectations match reality, or were there surprises?
My biggest surprise was how I was my main problem. As I learned how to love in sharing with God, things have grown much better, including now I have had my lady friend for about thirteen years. And I can stay in the same church without leaving in a huff. One "joke" was I supposed I had the teaching gift, but ones did not accept me and I would leave in a huff. Then it came to me that if I had the teaching gift, it was going to first and mainly teach *me* how to love!!! And I could see how I was not loving each person the way Jesus expects.

And then, as I got into praying to find and honor and learn from ones who were genuinely loving, I could discover people like this and feed on their good example. But then, yes, surprise!! Ones who seemed like good examples could turn out to have issues I did not expect. But this is why God's word says to be always ready with "longsuffering" > in Ephesians 4:2 > and forgiveness, never to give up on anyone > love "hopes all things" > in 1 Corinthians 13:7.

At times, after I left a place where I felt I was rejected, I might go back and visit and be surprised at how ones missed me and even might be more courteous with me, like they realized they had not related with me like they should. And I discovered how ones could be right by criticizing me, not rejecting, but caring about how it would be to have me with them and trying to help me so I could do better with other people. I was the one who could be the wrong way.
-How do you feel now about your place in the church?
Glad to be here. But I need to keep alive with hope for any and all others . . . never giving up on anyone. And the Sunday culture is not the church. Jesus and His sheep are all the time.
Upvote 0

Obama care collapsing.....

Wow,great mental gymnastics.
Yeah, I know, arithmetic makes my head spin sometimes, too.


Let's say that, hypothetically, 10 years ago, your premiums were $100/mo and, if the trends at the time had continued unabated, then after 10 years (i.e. today), your premiums would have increased to $1000/mo.

Now let's say there was a piece of legislation (call it IluvaCare) that cause your premiums today to only be $500/mo.

Did that legislation lower your costs?
Upvote 0

Trump plan for peace in Ukraine leaked; calls for Ukraine to cede additional territory, cut military forces. US Ukraine envoy to leave role

1763759204708.png
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GeAvbcLX0AA-EPN.jpg" alt="Roman Sheremeta on X"/>


It's only fair. Russia has lost a lot of men and equipment after Ukraine forced Russia to invade. Russia deserves some compensation for Ukraines aggression against a peaceful neighbor.


THE BUDAPEST MEMORANDUM (1994)- the agreement that should have prevented the Ukraine/Russia conflict!

1) With the demise of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in 1991, Ukraine and the other 14 Republics would emerge as independent sovereign states!

2) Four of those former 15 republics, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine and the Russian Federation all inherited nuclear stockpiles from the now defunct USSR - upon obtaining the status of a new nation in 1991, Ukraine also found itself to be the unwitting custodian of the world's 3rd largest stockpile of nuclear weapons!

3) The United States, United Kingdom and the Russian Federation proposed that Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine relinquish control of their aging nuclear weapons from the Soviet era in exchange for security guarantees - America agreed to provide political and economic support but would not commit to military intervention!

4) Some Ukrainians opposed handing over these nuclear weapons - given their nation's "tortured" relationship in the past with the former USSR, they argued that these stockpiles would provide the only viable deterrent to prevent aggression along the 1226 miles of joint international border that it shared with the Russian Federation!

5) The majority, however, would view the exchange of nuclear weapons for border security as their best option - Ukraine subsequently joined Belarus and Kazakhstan with all 3 former republics signing the Budapest Memorandum (1994) with the nuclear nations of the USA, UK and Russian Federation serving as guarantors!

6) Fast forward 20 years and in 2014 the Russian Federation reneges on the terms of Budapest Memorandum agreements by occupying the Crimean Peninsula and then promoting civilian unrest in Ukraine's eastern provinces west of the Russian border - perhaps with the added assistance of Putin's military dressed as Ukrainian civilians!

7) In 2022, the Russian Federation directed its military to invade all of Ukraine - after occupying approximately 20% of that nation's territory that included 3 to 4 million inhabitants, the war then degenerated into a standoff, a 21st C version of trench warfare from WW1!


8) Within this context, its paifully obvious that Trump is totally committed to imposing a peace treaty on Ukraine, any peace treaty - given that Russia's Putin has proven virtually impossible to manipulate, the pressure from the White House will be placed on Zelensky to provide this American President with an agreement that will in turn fuel his personal campaign to lobby for his real priority - the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize!

9) President Trump and his Administration appear oblivious to the fact that as a signatory to the Budapest Memorandum, with its exchange of nuclear stockpiles for preserving border security - why should Ukraine which is already in total compliance with the terms of the Memorandum, now be expected to provide additional concessions to the one member that has actually violated it repeatedly?

10) While not providing direct military intervention, America's first priority should be providing Ukraine with all the considerable political, economic and military support at its disposal that would pressure Putin to return to Ukraine's original 1991 borders - which were supposedly already guaranteed under the terms of the Memorandum!

11) Given that Putin already has a history of not honoring past signed agreements, why should the Ukraine allow itself to be pressured by the Trump Administration's into accepting a bad peace agreement, only to find itself in a similar position at some later date - once again negotiating with an adversary that can't be trusted and with supposed allies that continue not to hold the Russian Federation accountable for its actions!

12) With the continued proliferation of nations having nuclear weapons, the problems that continue to plague Ukraine, despite having signed the Budapest Memorandums, will only make those nations in the future that may find themselves confronted, under similar circumstances, all the more reluctant to dispense with their stockpiles - given its role as a deterrent in discouraging nations from engaging in military incursions into a neighbor's territory!
Upvote 0

Six Democrats urge military members to 'refuse illegal orders' in viral video; Hegseth responds

All those things are already explicitly and manifestly illegal by US law. They don't require any heat-of-the-moment interpretations of the Constitution by soldiers on the scene.

OTOH, orders to deploy to Portland and walk the streets are not manifestly illegal.
I agree but I remember when Trump wanted the military to shoot protesters in the legs. Thank goodness Esper and Milley said no.
Upvote 0

Do the Ten Commandments still apply under the new covenant today?

Sure, the blood in the new covenant is referring to the Spirit. We believers will be receiving it through Faith..
Actually it refers to the blood of Christ who provided the ultimate blood sacrifice for the redemption of our sins.

“And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup, which is poured out for you, is the new covenant in My blood.”
‭‭Luke‬ ‭22‬:‭20‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Upvote 0

"Don't Give up the Ship"

What if they are politicians themselves? Maybe they have a good grasp of the law. Maybe they don't. We may get a chance to find out. Certainly it's an arguable point since, in this specific case, a judge has prevented the Guard from doing anything. For now.

Chicago — Two Illinois National Guard members told CBS News they would refuse to obey federal orders to deploy in Chicago as part of President Trump's controversial immigration enforcement mission — a rare act of open defiance from within the military ranks.


"It's disheartening to be forced to go against your community members and your neighbors," said Staff Sgt. Demi Palecek, a Latina guardswoman and state legislative candidate from Illinois's 13th District. "It feels illegal. This is not what we signed up to do."

Both Palecek and Capt. Dylan Blaha, who is running for Congress in the same district, described growing unease among Guard members after the White House federalized 500 troops – including members of the Illinois and Texas National Guard – to secure federal immigration facilities and personnel in the Chicago area.

A federal judge on Wednesday delayed the deployment of the National Guard in Chicago indefinitely, until a final ruling is issued or the Supreme Court rules on the matter.
Federal orders to deploy to Chicago are not illegal.

I expect those two Guardsmen will be full civilians soon. Their public statements place them, as an NCO and as an officer, in violation of a couple of UCMJ articles.
Upvote 0

New laws imposing strict abortion limits fail in South Carolina and Nebraska, despite GOP majorities

Women, in my GOP, representing the interests of women? Can't have that.

Three female GOP state senators who filibustered S.C. abortion ban lost their primaries

Katrina Shealy, Sandy Senn and Penry Gustafson lost to three male candidates and were among a bipartisan group of five women state senators who filibustered a near-total abortion ban. They were nicknamed the "sister senators."
They got rid of the women, but still can't get the law passed.

South Carolina's near-total abortion ban fails to advance out of subcommittee

The controversial bill creates new definitions for human life, contraception and makes abortion a felony.

State Sen. Billy Garrett, one of the bill's original sponsors, abstained. At one point in the meeting, he said he wants to protect the unborn. However, he was against criminalizing mothers.

"I'm extremely in favor of saving babies' lives," Garrett said. "I'll always be that way. My constituents are that way. They asked me to be that way, and I am, but I have never intended, nor should any of us ever intend to, to punish or be punitive towards our moms."
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,526
Messages
65,419,252
Members
276,387
Latest member
breastcancer