• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

I Remember...

In grade school we could buy a tray of food or bring lunch. I have a memory of when I had a ham sandwich and a Jewish friend asked to trade his sandwich for mine because he'd never tasted ham. Another friend was saying not to give it to him because his parents didn't want him to eat ham. I didn't know nuthin about religion or anything so I didn't see the harm. I traded with him. :sorry:

After school my mom asked me how I liked my lunch. I told her I'd traded her sandwich with my friend. My folks knew he was Jewish so mom said "Ooh, you shouldn't do that. Don't do it again". But my dad was laughing out loud - "You gave your ham sandwich to the Goldstein kid?!" ROFL

One year In junior high they introduced the option to buy bag lunches of cheeseburgers, fries and milkshake. I recall there was some controversy about it with some of the parents, but for me it was YEAH!

View attachment 372673
LOL! (PHOTO).
Upvote 0

Ellen White clearly taught Jesus is the great I AM.

I would not call Jesus though either Michael nor just a mighty god
And yet we have verses in Gods Word that make the connection....

6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. 7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this. Isaiah 9:6-7 (KJV)

25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. Dan 9:25 (KJV)

14 But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you; 15 And killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses. Acts 3:14-15 (KJV)

31 Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins. Acts 5:31 (KJV)

But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia. Daniel 10:13 (KJV)

But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince. Daniel 10:21 (KJV)

And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. Dan 12:1 (KJV)
  • Agree
Reactions: Freth
Upvote 0

Weekly homilies

Homily Thursday, November 6 2025

31st OT



Rm 14:7-12

"We are the Lord’s."



The life within us is God with us.



Lk 15:1-10

The Pharisees and scribes complained about Jesus: "This man welcomes sinners and eats with them!"



God offers a meal to everyone. He invites everyone to his table.



Anyone who judges others is not in a perfect relationship with God.



Biblical texts : NAB-RE

Normand Thomas.
Upvote 0

Why we Christians still have to struggle with sins?

Obedience is a beautiful thing to God and benefits us greatly in our walk of sanctification. But our justification before God is found only in the faith of the ONLY ONE whose obedience the Father accepts.

Your salvation is secured in Christ my brother and sealed by the Holy Spirit. Our works reveal how deeply rooted, or shallow, our faith is in the work of His beloved Son, on the father’s behalf.

blessings,
All of that sounds nice, but it leaves out the crucial part, and is it why many seek to enter and few find the narrow straight path.

No salvation is secured or sealed, that would be a message many would hear and hold to, but it wont benefit those same many, AT ALL. MANY FALSE PROPHETS RISE TO DECEIVE MANY.)

We do not have a walk of sanctification, we are sanctified by belief that the Lord Jesus Christ offered Himself for us without spot or blemish, and the Father accepted HIs sacrifice for our sins, and in a conscience purified by believing, we are sanctified and justified.

That is the obedience the Father accepts, of our Lord Jesus Christ obedient unto death, because through that we both have life and obedience ourselves, in faith unto death.
Upvote 0

The Trump Crypto Scam


The U.S. president’s family raked in more than $800 million from sales of crypto assets in the first half of 2025 alone, a Reuters examination found, on top of potentially billions more in unrealized “on paper” gains. Much of that cash has come from foreign sources...

DUBAI - Eric Trump was in Dubai on family business. Meeting with a Chinese businessman and his associates on the sidelines of a cryptocurrency conference in May this year, the son of U.S. President Donald J. Trump ran through his usual talking points about the inefficiency of traditional banks and his own famous father’s run-ins with financiers.

Then came the pitch. Buy at least $20 million of “governance tokens” in the Trump family’s crypto business, World Liberty Financial, and become part of a venture that Eric Trump predicted would soon embody the future of finance in America...

In the first half of this year, the Trump Organization’s income soared 17-fold to $864 million from $51 million a year earlier, according to Reuters calculations based on the president’s official disclosures, property records, financial records released in court cases, crypto trade information and other sources. Of the first-half total, $802 million – more than 90% – came from Trump crypto ventures, including sales of World Liberty tokens.

That $864 million payday represents actual income – cash flowing, free and clear, into Trump family coffers. Reuters’ calculations were reviewed by half a dozen crypto and real estate experts and a certified accountant who has studied the U.S. Internal Revenue Service’s approach to crypto.

“These people are not pouring money into coffers of the Trump family because of the brothers’ acumen. They are doing it because they want freedom from legal constraints and impunity that only the president can deliver.”
-- Kathleen Clark, law professor at Washington University


"B-b-but Trump's not taking a salary!"

Isn't this what they falsely accused Biden of doing? Though as we all know, Biden never took a single dollar, while Trump's taken nearly a billion (so far).
Well, maybe that's better than taking in multiple millions from China or insider trading
Upvote 0

2025 World Series

The 2025 World Series was fantastic. The Los Angeles Dodgers beat the Toronto Blue Jays 4 games to 3 and two of those games went to extra innings. I've been a Dodgers fan since the summer of 1968 and that was the most exciting team they've fielded in all those years. I'm not saying it was the best, but it was the most exciting in my humble opinion. Congratulations Dodgers, back to back World Series Champions!

AI Image Generators

Indeed, I wouldn’t use the subscription accounts.
One last word, , if anyone has a mind to follow AI's lead and snap up an earlier CD-release of Adobe Illustrator to gain access, , forget it. AI maintains you can use an old release like mine to get to the finely crafted PostScript Type 1 fonts but won't always be able to edit them'. False! I can drop the hardcopy in and poof, all typefaces remain updated. Offline install? I could not.
Upvote 0

Hello Everyone!

Hello, my name is Henrik Kochan. I'm an author living in Israel.

My books in Hebrew include The Meaning of Life – Socrates, Jesus, Nietzsche and Jesus and the Laws of Moses. I’ve recently completed my first book in English (not yet published), titled Steps to Heaven: On Morality, God, and the Soul. It explores themes such as salvation in Judaism and Christianity, Jesus and Paul, the Holy Spirit, atonement, and more.

Although I’m not Christian myself, I’m deeply interested in these topics and would love to hear what my Christian friends here in the forum think about them.
Hi Henrik. Welcome aboard.
Upvote 0

Vatican stops use of titles for Mary

The Blessed Virgin Mary was never officially referred to as co-Redemptrix. The group advocating for this “Fifth Dogma” was doing so based on a peculiar threatening vision of “the Lady who was once called Mary” by a Dutch woman named Ida Peerdeman, which was consistently declared unworthy of belief by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is now the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, but still the same entity basically.
Oh the apparition movement and such. Thanks.
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

Scripture makes clear that salvation begins with God’s gracious initiative—no one comes to Christ by their own unaided will. Jesus Himself said, “No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him” (John 6:44). Our hearts are naturally turned away from Him, and apart from the Spirit’s work, we would never seek God (Romans 3:10–11).
The Drawing is the commencement of Spiritual Salvation Titus 3:5
Upvote 0

Isaiah 43:10 Doesn't Say that YHWH wasn't "Formed"

So in the synagogue where I go to, I stated the same question. The Rabbi said on the Isaiah verse: "In Hebrew you can interpreted the verse to mean that HaShem is the only deity that was "formed" or "crafted,". But it is better to take interpret it in the meaning of unlike idols, the true God was not created."


I am not looking for ways to support that YHWH was formed. I think a lot of the first 3 chapters of genesis especially the creation(gen1) and formation(gen2) of humanity reflects what happened to YHWH and his Wisdom themselves.
Assuming YHWH was formed (based on very thin assumptions) only creates another logical problem - who formed Him then? I'd stick with the common and easiest view and use my time/energy for more pressing Theological or Sanctification or Life issues.

What synagogue is that btw if I may ask? In what town?
Upvote 0

What are YOU currently reading? (8)

I am reading "Mother's golden guineas".

Summary:
It's about a boy’s moral and spiritual journey, sparked by his misuse of his mother’s treasured savings.
Tom’s journey is a classic tale of youthful rebellion followed by repentance and maturity.
The novel reflects the Victorian emphasis on conscience, duty, and forgiveness.

Rating: 7/10 (it might change later)
Upvote 0

Which Groups Are More Likely To Believe That Violence Is Sometimes Necessary To Gain Political Aims?

No, my statement was more sarcastic than anything. If your measure of justice is truly whether or not it succeeds, then you have no sense of justice. My position on the Jan 6 rebellion is it was misguided, but if they truly believed that the election was stolen the rioters were justified in seeking a rebellion.
Then they were fools encouraged by a liar. There wasn't, isn't and will never be any justification for it.
Upvote 0

Prince Andrew gives up royal titles after string of scandals

No, I do not use social media. It is not about to fall into common use or anything. You did nothing but entertain a couple of neurons in my brain, and they are still amused.
Shame. I was going to split the royalties with you.
  • Haha
Reactions: RamiC
Upvote 0

Is the Nicene creed supportive of Reformed Theology?

“I am Reformed, so penal substitution, of course.” I know what you mean, but surely the argument that I will need to use in discussion with my Methodist elite is, “I stand by the Bible, so penal substitution, of course.” Wesley has his beliefs about Christ turning away God’s wrath and man’s need to cooperate in his salvation [derived] from the Bible.
I am unsure about what you’re after, here—because both of those are saying the same thing. You had asked me, “What do you think scripture points to? Where do you stand?” Since I am Reformed, I said, obviously I think scripture points to penal substitutionary atonement (which is where I stand).

If you are seeking a biblical argument for penal substitutionary atonement, I would direct you to Louis Berkhof (here) to begin with.

You have some great stuff here, but do you have conviction from another source – the indwelling Holy Spirit, Christ in us, the hope of glory, knowing the power of God (Jesus to the Pharisees). Because, again, Wesley will refer back to his heart being strangely warmed.
The source for all my beliefs, either directly or indirectly, is the Word of God. How I happen to feel about any particular idea (e.g., whether it warms my heart) is not relevant because that says something about me—yet the question is about God and his plan of redemption.

I do believe, however, that the indwelling Spirit always responds positively to the witness of Scripture. He wrote it, after all. This is a Reformed perspective: the testimonium Spiritus Sancti internum (internal testimony of the Holy Spirit) authenticates the Word to the believer’s heart, but it does not add content or serve as a separate epistemic channel apart from Scripture.

My last pastor was a professor of computation physics and cosmology. I could never understand [how] the wonders of his discipline didn't inspire his appreciation of the creator.
Amen.

Anyway, I am coming to the belief that Wesley has an amputated atonement belief. He is not brave enough to accept the fullness of what Christ did for us, a work that cannot be added to by our efforts.
Agreed.

Are you sure you haven't a developed system that acts like a procrustean bed and chops off bits of scripture you don't like? You express a certain amount of reservation about your handling of those judgment of works texts. For Arminians, this would be a sign of weakness.
The reserved language you are detecting stems not from trying to fit scriptures into a foregone conclusion but from the fact that this idea is new and still taking shape. I inherited a lot of beliefs from my Baptist beginnings, including this anthropocentric perspective on the judgment seat of Christ, and I am methodically revisiting the things that I once believed and bringing them into a coherent alignment with my doctrinal maturation and current biblical convictions. In other words, I am re-examining those inherited assumptions in light of a Christ-centered reading of Scripture. This is not about trimming verses to fit a system but about letting a coherent biblical theology emerge from them.

Anyway, again, I am more and more convinced of the things you believe. Thanks.
I am pleased that the discussion has been useful. My hope is always that we are both being driven deeper into Scripture and a clearer understanding of what it teaches.
Upvote 0

Midrash "B'reisheet" (In the Beginning...GOD...)

PARASHAH: “B’reisheet” (In the Beginning) GENESIS 1:1-6:8

Just got back from 3 weeks in Miami, FL, visiting family and ministering in our Messianic congregation, Beth Hesed. Have to catch up on articles.


During Simchat Torah (The Joy of the Torah) or (Happiness in having God's WORD in our midst), we begin in Genesis…But…Some have the tradition of reading the last few verses of Deuteronomy (34:10-12) “And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moshe……..and in all that mighty hand, and in all the great terror which Moshe shewed in the sight of all Israel.”

Interesting that the very last word in Deuteronomy is “Israel”. We read verses 10 through 12, and in the same breath, continue with Genesis 1:1. This means that the Torah is a continuous book, like a circle.

The very first line in Genesis, the very first line in the Torah has so much meaning; “B’reisheet bara Elohim ET haShamayim v’et haAretz”(the first 7 words) (In the beginning, Elohim created the heavens and the earth). One thing to point out, in many English Bibles, the word “heaven” is singular and should be “heavens” (plural), because in Hebrew, “HaShamayim” is “heavens”. Also, in the words, “B’reisheet Bara Elohim” (In the beginning, Elohim created), we find the mixed letters that spell out “Israel” also. So, the Torah begins with “Israel” and ends with “Israel”. If we look at the Hebrew letters that spell out “B’reisheet Bara Elohim,” we find “Israel” how? Well, let’s see;… Beit, Resh, Aleph, Shin, Yod, Tav……Beit, Resh, Aleph…..Aleph, Lamed, Hey, Yod, Mem sofit. Then we pick out the letters that form “Israel”: Yod, Shin, Resh, Aleph, Lamed. What can this tell us? That from the “Beginning,” Elohim had Israel in mind! This is just one way one could look at this.

Another aspect we can look at is the letter “Alef,” which in Hebrew has no sound by itself, yet takes the sound of whatever vowel that is placed below it. Within the first 7 words, there are 6 Alefs. When one spells out “Alef” in Hebrew, we get “Alef, Lamed, and Peh” (A L P). These three letters together also mean “One Thousand” (pronounced “elef”). Many rabbis believe that the symbolism of these 6 Alefs in the first 7 words, is “6 thousand years for mankind living on the earth” followed by another “thousand” (7 thousand years) which would be the Millennial reign of Messiah, then the number “8” (the eighth day of Sukkot) which could be the beginning of the “New Heavens and the New Earth ” (of course, this is just a possibility). Here's another interesting thing;

Within the first 7 words, we find the word “Emet” (Truth), “Alef, Mem, and Tav”, and this is one of the titles of Yeshua, who is the “Way”, the “TRUTH”, and the “Life”. He is also the “Living Word” (See John 1:1), so we see Yeshua even in Genesis 1:1

“7” is the perfect number of YHVH. If we take the seven words, and take the middle word “ET”, and take this word “ET and draw a vertical line from it, we can make a “Menorah” with three lines from the middle line connected to “ET” to the other words in this first verse. The word “ET” does not have a literal translation, yet it points to a specific object that is very important. “ET” in the ancient Hebrew letters is the “Alef and the Tav” or in Greek, the “Alpha and Omega” Or…. the “God of the Covenant”. So, every time we see “ET” in the original Hebrew, we are reminded of “YHVH, the God of the Covenant”

Why does the Bible start with the letter “Beit” or “B”? Why not with “Alef” or “A”? Isn’t the “Alef” the symbol for “God”? There is a story about the letters “Alef” and “Beit” who are arguing as to who would be first. They both came to Elohim and presented their case. Elohim-YHVH said, “Alef”, you are very important as you represent who I AM. You will be the third letter in the Bible because “3” symbolizes “Elohim” because we are united as Father, Son, and Spirit, three entities in one “Echad” being.

“As for you, letter “Beit” you will be first because you symbolize the “house” which I will make for mankind, for the plants, trees, and flowers, and for all the beasts which I will create. This house will be called “earth”. This perfect planet will be a “B’rakhah” a “Blessing” to my creation, therefore, the Torah must start with “B”

Also, the letter “Beit” is closed on three sides, yet open on one, the left side. This means that before the “beginning,” there was nothing, only Elohim, and revelation starts with “B” going towards the “left” as the Hebrew is written.”

So, therefore, the Alef and the Beit left, both satisfied with the verdict from Elohim-YHVH. We also see in the first line the creation of the three basic elements of the universe: “space” (the heavens), “time” (in the beginning), and “matter” (the earth). We have an infinite God that comes out of infinity past and speaks and creates a finite earth. Creates matter. The first law of Thermodynamics states that “All matter has been created and that there is no more matter being created.” What we do see is that “matter changes states” (from liquid to solid, = water to ice) or from liquid to gas = water vapor.

We can also see today the effects of the “2nd law of thermodynamics, which shows that everything in the material world is on a downward spiral, from order to disorder, from composition to decomposition, from perfection to imperfection. Because of sin! The wages of sin is death, and therefore, not only in the world of the living but also in the material world, everything is “dying”

Elohim looked upon the earth he was forming, which was then, a lot of water and earth elements, and then spoke in verse 3 saying, “Haya haOr” (let there be light) “V’yahi or” (and there was light). And Elohim saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness” (vs 4) There are 4 levels of Torah understanding which are “Peshat” (literal), “Derash” (moral and spiritual), “Remez” (Symbolic), and “Sod” (hidden), (this is when we use gematria, or numbers with math to come to different revelations, mind you this is NOT numerology!)

There was the physical light, the light we can see, and also, the WORD of God which is looked upon as “light” YESHUA also is referred to the “Light of the World” light is also “sinless perfection” and the “darkness” is also the physical darkness, which is needed, for us to rest at night, so that the flowers can close up and sleep. I can also refer to the “spiritual darkness” which is “evil” or “sin”. SO… there is a separation between what is holy and what is not holy, between sin and perfection, between evil and good. Between our “daylight” and our “nighttime” (taking it literally).

Now, if I were going to study every verse, this first parashah would be perhaps ten pages long, so we are going to jump a bit. Elohim created all that this earth contains in 6 literal days, of 24-hour periods. Now, there are some SSs (silly scientists) that say, “the six days are considered a period of four billion years!” Really? Really? Well, if we look at verse 12, it says that Elohim created the plants, trees, grass, etc, then in verse 14, it says that Elohim created the lights in the heavens, which include the sun, moon, and the stars. Well, if each “day” consisted of, let’s say, 600,000,000 years, then how would the plants and trees, and life itself, survive without sunlight for this amount of time?

Many times, we just have to take God’s word literally. “Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness…and Elohim created the man and the woman in His own image” (vs 26-27). What does this mean, in HIS own image? What is the IMAGE of ELOHIM? One could say that the image of Elohim is complete holiness and perfection! Sinlessness! That was how the first couple was made. The earth was “created” without any previously existing matter, yet man and woman were “created” using “already existing matter,” namely,” the dust of the earth (adamah).

The name “Elohim” shows the “plural unity (Echad)” of God, and just as Elohim consists of the Father, the Son, and the Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit) so man and woman were also joined “Echad” with Elohim in mind, soul, and spirit. What is man? What is a woman? But a soul and spirit inhabiting a flesh and bone body. Bodies that will one day (because of sin) deteriorate and cease to function, and return to the earth.

Elohim loved his creation of man and woman. He placed them in a perfect paradise home, a garden full of trees that produced fruit, nuts, flowers, clean water, and animals that were friendly. The only prohibition was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. But…as we know the story, HaSatan tricked them into eating the forbidden fruit. As soon as Adam and Eve ate the fruit (and nowhere does it say that it was an apple), the Word says that they “realized that they were naked” (3:7), but weren’t they already naked? I mean, they weren’t created wearing Levi's! However...remember that the word “light” the words “light” and “skin” are written almost the same way in Hebrew, the only difference is the first letter, “skin” is “OR” written with the letter “ayin” which symbolizes “eye” and OR (light) is written with an “Aleph”

It is possible, and probable that Adam and Eve were created with a covering of “light” When Moses came down from Mt. Sinai after being with God for 40 days, he was “glowing” with light, the Shekinah light, and Moses was a sinner, imagine Adam and Eve who were sinless, their light covering would have been permanent had they not sinned (and would still be alive today). When they disobeyed and ate the forbidden fruit, the light covering must have vanished, THEN…they saw that they were NAKED, without the light, which served, one could say as, “a skin of light over the skin of flesh”

The sin of eating the forbidden fruit shows the following: the LUST OF THE FLESH, THE LUST OF THE EYES, AND THE PRIDE OF LIFE. Eve was hungry, she “saw” that it looked really delicious, and she “thought” it would make her “wise” as the serpent lied to her, saying the same. Sin today is the same; it is a mix of all three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life

“And YHVH Elohim made coats of skins for the man and for the woman and dressed them” (3:21). This is the very first blood sacrifice in the Bible. YHVH had to sacrifice one or two innocent animals, perhaps two lambs or goats, to “cover” Adam and Eve. This is a reminder of Yom Kippur, where the blood of animals covered the sins of Israel for one year. This would be a reminder to Adam and Eve of their sin. Their sin caused an innocent, blameless animal to lose its life.

The Word of God does not say, but we can imagine that YHVH told Adam and Eve that they would have to sacrifice a lamb, or a goat, or another kosher animal every day, to remind them of their sin. We look towards the cross of Calvary and we see YESHUA the LAMB of God who offered himself up as a blood sacrifice for our sins, once and forever, not just to cover, but to erase.

In chapter 4, we see the birth of Kayin and Hevel (Cain and Abel). They were born with the sin nature, and we see in both boys, the direction of the world that they would follow; some would choose holiness and all that is good, and others would choose the unholy and all that is evil. There came a time when they both had to offer sacrifices (that is why I said that Adam and Eve must have taught them to do the same). Hebel chose to obey, and Kayin chose to disobey. Kayin offered a sacrifice, but it was not a blood sacrifice; rather, it was a “grain offering. nothing wrong with a grain offering, but a blood sacrifice was needed. Therefore, it was rejected.

Hebel, however, offered the correct sacrifice, a blood sacrifice, and it was accepted. This caused anger and jealousy in Kayin, and we know the story: Kayin rose up and murdered his brother, Hebel. Yet YHVH Elohim still offers him an opportunity to repent and confess his sin, but Kayin does not. Then YHVH Elohim says;

“The voice of your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground” (4:10). The Hebrew word is “damei” or “bloods”; it is written in the plural. But why is this? This alludes to the idea (which is written in the Talmud) that “he who saves the life of one person is as if he has saved a whole nation, and he who takes a life of another, is as if he has murdered a whole nation.” It is as if the souls of all the “would have been” descendants of Hebel were crying out for vengeance because they would not be permitted to be born. “The voice of thy brother’s bloods cries out…” the many “bloods” cry out in “one voice” so it seems.

Hebel is slain, his blood is sacrificed, and Kayin goes away, runs away to the land of wandering (Nod) and becomes a vagabond, just wandering, living off the fruit of trees and whatever grows of itself, since now, his farming days are over. YHVH curses the land he farmed as punishment.

We can see here again a shadow of Yom Kippur. In Yom Kippur, two goats were selected, one was sacrificed, and the other was “sent away.” Here, Innocent and righteous Hebel is sacrificed, and Kayin “goes away” yet this “going away” is in the negative light, he “goes away” from the presence of Adonai, while Hebel goes “into the presence of Adonai”

There is a saying that goes like this; “you can mix good apples with bad apples, and the good apples will never correct the bad, rather the bad-rotten apples will corrupt the good ones. Well, that is the way the “world turned” way back then, as the years pass, the descendants of Kayin mixed with the descendants of Seth, (who was born after the death of Hebel.

“And it came to be that when men began to increase on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of Elohim saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose. And YHVH said, ‘My Ruach will not strive with mankind forever in his going astray. He is flesh, and his days shall be 120. The Nephilim (in some translations, the giants) were on the earth in those days, and when the sons of Elohim came into the daughters of men, they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men of old, men of name (fame). 6:1-4

There are two schools of thought when the issue of “B’nei Elohim” comes up. Some believe that it refers to the godly line of Seth mixing with the ungodly line of Kayin. The other school of thought, which is more probable, is that the “sons of God” refer to the fallen angels that were kicked out of heaven together with HaSatan. These “b’nei Elohim” somehow and someway transformed themselves into flesh and blood, and the offspring of those “demon-human” relationships were born “giants”. The word “Nephilim” means “fallen ones”. It does not mean “giants” …however…those “mighty men of old” many were “giants”; we have examples; Goliath of Gath, Og, king of Bashan. The pre-diluvian giants were destroyed during the flood of Genesis; however, their DNA still survived and was passed along through Ham's wife. The descendant of Ham was Canaan, and among the Canaanites, there were giants.

YHVH has decided to destroy and cleanse the earth by a universal flood, and Noah and his family were found to be the only righteous people around. Noah will receive instructions to build an ark, and it will take him 120 years, so the people will have 120 years to repent, which they did not. This was a very short time considering that thousands of years ago, people lived 800 or 900 years. 120 years would be like a week in our times. Noah was a “Tzadik,” a “righteous person”. He went “against the flow”. Imagine a school of fish going in one direction, and you are going in the opposite direction.

How about you? If the world is going down the tubes, headed for destruction, will you follow the world? Or will you remain with Yeshua and go HIS way? The choice is yours. The only way we can be a true “Tzadik Ben Elohim” (a righteous child of God) is through faith in Yeshua HaMashiach/ Jesus the Christ, through faith in HIM, trusting in HIS one-time atonement for sin.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,877,678
Messages
65,404,725
Members
276,347
Latest member
Nicolasgava