Jesus did not say find the proper place to have your ears tickled or your lives manipulated. He said this is the way it is, take it or leave it.

From Pilate that washed his hands to Simon's denial, and even through Simon of Cyrene that bore the cross intermitently, please, do you think they all kind of lost their souls, while Jesus was busy saving them (their souls) on the cross? If yes, and in a likewise and general manner, is it possible people loose something of their souls when attempting to secure their body's safety, as they deal with Truth in also washing hands, denying, etc.. ?
In short, is there any other way to keep souls safe but to uphold thruth, whatsoever happens ?

Judge dismisses Comey, James indictments after finding that prosecutor was illegally appointed​

Jim Comey (and Tish James) are going to have a nice Thanksgiving.

Yarddog said:

What's your point? You seem to fail to understand that life matters. What is going on in international waters isn't war. It's policing and there are laws and regulations covering how these matters are handled.

Click to expand...

We can agree that not everything legal is moral and that not everything moral is legal.

What we're talking about here is not the sanctity of life, but the legality of homicide. Sometimes homicide is legal, and historically the courts have given extremely wide latitude to the President to decide when it's legal for the president to use the military for homicide...particularly outside the boundaries of the US.

To be frank, in international waters a nation can essentially do whatever it's capacity of global violence and trade allows.

“The War Department categorically denies that any Pentagon lawyers, including SOUTHCOM lawyers, with knowledge of these operations have raised concerns to any attorneys in the chain of command regarding the legality of the strikes conducted thus far because they are aware we are on firm legal ground,” Parnell said.

Click to expand...

Whatever Colonel Meagher had to say, he didn't put it on the record. As a colonel, he's over 20 years...he can retire with an extremely comfortable retirement pay, a very soft sword to fall upon.

Yarddog said:

If an isn't illegal, why would there be a court marshal? No, an action is believed to be illegal before a court marshal and the court judges if the person is guilty of breaking as law or regulation.

Click to expand...

The court-martial is to determine if the circumstances make it illegal. In most courts-martial, the issue not whether the defendant committed an act (that's why the conviction rate for courts-martial is in the 90% range). The issue is whether there were mitigating circumstances.

For instance, if a soldier refuses to obey what he believes is an illegal order, the first action of the court would be to place into record that the defendant did, indeed, violate UCMJ articles 90, 91, and/or 92 (refusal to obey an order or regulation from a person authorized to issue it). Finding the defendant guilty of that charge, the court will then determine whether there was an acceptable mitigating circumstance for that refusal.

Yarddog said:

You don't have the ability to interpret the Constitution, according to your posts.

Click to expand...

I'm just repeating the interpretation of the Court when ex post facto laws have come before it in the past.

These Congresscritters issued a statement that I fear will make many young troops think they have the authority to interpret the Constitution. They do not. The military does not have constitutional authority to interpret the Constitution. This statement is very likely to get a lot of troops in serious trouble. A Bad Conduct Discharge with federal felony prison time is highly likely, and that will dog a person for life.

People expect the military to be the cavalry that saves them from the result of their poor voting decisions over the last 20 years. The military does not have the power to do that. The nation voted for this plate of green wienies, and the nation is going to have to eat it.

It is common for custody decrees to specify which parent(s) has decision-making authority over health and education decisions. Now maybe religious upbringing, too?

probinson said:

The fact that you're trying to "explain" how 500 is lower than 100 is absolutely indicative of "spin" on your part.

Click to expand...

If you read my post as claiming that, then it would seem that the other guy wasn’t the only one struggling to comprehend what I understood to be something pretty basic.

Christ the King Sunday at my parish.

Nick Fuentes refers to people with terms like "Jit". He has said that his disgusting sycophants should not support Vance because Vance has insufficient commitment to white identity. ANYONE who gives a platform to Fuentes deserves every bit as much scorn as does Fuentes. Would you give a large speaking engagement to Adolph Hitler then whine when people dislike you for so doing? I'm sure that there are Americans who would.

7thKeeper said:

... Kinda worrisome that you're saying the President himself isn't that smart.

Click to expand...

Why would anyone expect the president to be as smart as the White House lawyers in crafting Executive Branch documentation?

Brightfame52 said:

All men that are drawn actually and it's by Christ Will not theirs!

Click to expand...

You've swallowed every drop of the causal determinism koolaid. You wish to apply it to the gospel of grace.

'He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.'

”The truth is to simple for us, we do not like those who unmask our illusions.'

It may make you feel special, and you are, as much as every person on earth.

Chesterton said:

Sounds pretty sacrilegious, but whatever. You be you, Your Majesty.

Click to expand...

Thank you. No, it’s not sacrilegious. Destroying gravestones like the Romanovs did would be.

This is very funny in light of the Mamndani/Trump lovefest.

There are no socialists running for office in the USA. Socialism is the control of the means of production and commerce by the state, allegedly acting as a proxy for "the people". Socialism is not the presence of tax-funded programs or utilities. Indeed it has been argued quite effectively that such programs, as are seen in the Scandinavian countries, are fundamentally anti-socialist, because they create a more content workforce that is less likely to dispossess the capitalists. These programs are called "welfare capitalism" by those who actually understand socialism. Socialism requires prohibiting the private ownership of the means of production and commerce. A Prime Minister of Denmark felt it necessary to correct ignorant Americans, like Bernie Sanders, who insisted that countries like Denmark are socialist. Denmark’s prime minister says Bernie Sanders is wrong to call his country socialist

Before one starts a pearl clutching festival about "socialism", learn what socialism is and is not. There are no socialists in the USA who are currently in office.

ChubbyCherub said:

What causes issue is the whole Roman Catholic church/government introduction to the Trinity, to the populace, as a way to appease harmony between Christians and Romans who were polytheist.

Also, the fact that the Trinity is never explicitly mentioned in the bible. The verses that are provided as 'evidence', to me, are not evidence.

So, if both of these points are true (I can't verify any sources re: Roman intro to Trinity etc off the top of my head - it's just something I've come across), then it explains why it's hard for me to comprehend despite many attempts at others explaining!

Thanks for prayer! It is appreciated and needed!

Click to expand...

True, trinity is not found in the Bible, and I don’t agree with the concept. It’s used because it’s the easiest way for some religions to explain God, Jesus, and Holy Spirit.

But, the way to see God’s true structure is to look at His creation.

If God created certain species, starting with only two in each creation, and from the original two, those species would multiply, then those species were created based on God’s structure in heaven.

It’s the attributes of each species that’s important, that makes them who they are.

For example:
There are three in Heaven Who have the attributes or qualities of God that makes them God - the Creator.

Then there are a multitude in heaven who have the attributes of angels that makes them angels - created beings.

Then there is the species of man on earth whose attributes identify them to be man -created beings.

And so on.

Each created species have their own attributes - however, are patterned after their creator Who Has His own attributes.

The attributes of God cannot be fully comprehended because our minds are unable to think past our beginning. We have a beginning but God does not.

Read 1 Corinthians 15:37-49 KJV, which provides a deeper understanding of God’s creation.

Yes, and do pray as you read. Also you might use a reference Bible to find related scriptures to strengthen your understanding.

God bless!

All kinds of interesting things were made known.

Like how many big MAGA infleuncers are not even in America.

Yet all the thief on the cross had to do, like all of us, was to put others ahead of self instead of following a path of selfishness like the other thief. He followed both of Jesus' commandments. But I guess that would cut down on the need for human church services and the like. We're the ones who like to complicate things, not God. We were given a simple task to show our fruits, while God would do the rest in overcoming adversity in both the human and spiritual worlds.

FredVB said:

But there was real repentance, that is essential.

Click to expand...

Yes he understood the power of putting others first. He admitted his guilt but said Jesus was innocent. He did all that was required in putting others ahead of self, effectively following the second commandment, unlike the other thief who was all about self and had no place in the Kingdom.

King Kong

Dan1988 said:

Please identify who the "we" are that you speak of, it sounds like your not making any distinction between the children of God and the children of the Devil.

Click to expand...

All are free to make the choice. Jesus didn't say my people over here and repent, the rest over there and never mind understanding the Gospel of the Kingdom that says God will overcome all adversity and take government away from both elohim and mankind. That's like saying voters don't have a choice in who they side with. But yes, God does not deal with closed minds. It is these who seek division, while God seeks to reunite. But yes, Jesus was thankful for those whom the father had given him.

zoidar said:

I don’t think using grammar to support theology is wrong in itself. The issue is that his grammatical reading doesn’t seem objective, which is the real problem.

Click to expand...

It's a supplement, where it becomes an issue is when it is used as the centerpiece for an argument and treated as if exegesis is just a matter of doing the technical work.

FredVB said:

Physicists Have Mathematically Proven the Universe Is Not a Simulation

A new study applies logic and physics to provide a definitive answer to one of science’s greatest questions. It’s an idea often explored in science fiction: what if our entire universe is actually a simulation created by an advanced civilization’s supercomputer? New research from UBC Okanagan su

scitechdaily.com

Click to expand...

It sounds impressive whenever scientists say that they've proved something, but one needs to be careful about misinterpreting what scientists mean by proved.

As far as this particular study goes, I'm with Sabine on giving it a 9 out of 10 on the BS meter, and I'd already filed it in my evidence database accordingly. But still, I'll give you an 'A' for effort.

Login to view embedded media

stevevw said:

Its not just about Trump or any side.I don't want to get into who is the worst or which side does what.

Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but you're the one who brought that up. If you can show what these cases/things are, sure, go ahead, they should be. But if you can't, then it'll just end up being an attempt to handwave one person's misdoings away by accusing others. It only works and is true, if that double standard actually applies. Otherwise those are just accurate accusations.

The North Dakota Supreme Court has narrowly upheld a state law that bans abortions in nearly all circumstances, overturning a lower court ruling against it.

Last Friday, the state’s highest court released an opinion in the case of Access Independent Health Services, Inc., et al v. Drew H. Wrigley et al., which centered on whether a 2023 state law banning abortion is constitutional.

Although three of the five justices who heard the case found the ban unconstitutional, North Dakota requires a supermajority of the court to strike down a law on constitutional grounds.

State Supreme Court Justices Daniel Crothers and Lisa Fair McEvers found the ban unconstitutional, with Daniel Narum, a district court judge who sat in place of recused Justice Douglas Bahr, joining them.

Continued below.