timewerx said:

Oops

John 14:26
But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.

1 John 2:27
As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.

John 16:13
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.

Many Christians unknowingly idolize the Bible, turning it into a false god by placing its authority above the Holy Spirit. Or simply from spiritual blindness.

Click to expand...

Oops

2Ti 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

All authentic Christians uphold the holy scriptures as the standard of truth all other testimonies are to be judged by. The scriptures themselves claim to be "given by inspiration of God". They are therefore a standard which should not be contradicted. But to the contrary as the above God inspired scriptures state, they are -

"profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works."

All new professed revelations from God or the Holy Spirit, should then of course be compared to this standard for authenticity. If it contradicts the plain testimony of that already given by inspiration of God, the Holy Spirit, it is to be rejected.

Delvianna said:

Your title.

Click to expand...

Title doesn't say that.

But she did receive multiple death threats.

Pepperdoodle said:

I'm not a fan of any of those, but the things they said about celebrities keeping their political opinions to themselves and in the voting booth is right.

Click to expand...

I'm trying to think of a modern day version lol and I can't. Well actually I think there are too many now as just about every celeb is doing it that its almost morally wrong not to do it lol. Your not Woke or PC enough and you must virtue signal to be relevant and worthy in the eyes of society.

We have seen the fall of several celebs due to getting too political. Snow White and all the carry on is a good example I think lol. Emma and Harry Potter and J K Rowling is another. How politics destroys good entertainment.

Pepperdoodle said:

Not sure what you mean by saying not "forcing".....that's exactly what the Left leaning and their celebrities do all the time, so if it's good for them to do, there should be no issue with the opposite side doing so or atleast encouraging, since that would be just following the precedent the Left have laid.

Click to expand...

Yes I agree. People are forcing an ideology onto others when they stood on the idea that everyone should be able to express their beliefs and views. They reneged on the contract. They are not practicing what they preached.

But I don't think the answer is that if one group is forcing their ideology onto others that others then force theirs back.

I think the idea that ideologies must be forced is itself the problem. It use to be that society allowed and accepted that there were groups who had different ideas and beliefs. But each would stay to themselves and create their own little world and associated with those who were like minded.

But then the ideologues that created this multi ideology world have reneged and now want to force one ideology over others.

But the best way to defeat any ideology is to use truth and reality. This belongs to no one but is just truth and reality or whatever you want to call it. The key is it is not a human ideological determinatio. But an independent truth of reality.

And sometimes that truth and reality is the truth and reality that no one should force anyone to go against their own beliefs or conscience. Which ironically is the same truth and reality we have come to know all along and what made us a free society in the first place. Its loving your neighbour and treating them how you want to be treated. Gods second greatest commandment.

Gracious Heavenly Father and Lord Jesus,
I pray for Jonojim’s family situation, please support them in their hour of need, as You know what is best to do.
In Christ’s Name,
Amen

mark46 said:

The key is not firings. The key is to label the largest number possible as non-essential and THEN not bring them back, as has been done in the past. During a shutdown, the government always does with less.

Click to expand...

There seems to be some confusion that non-essential means not necessary. Office managers, for instance, are necessary but non-essential meaning no lives will be lost, even if the office becomes dysfunctional. The people who take care of the tourist areas in national parks are necessary, but non-essential. The ones that maintain warehouses are necessary, but non-essential.

mark46 said:

The government is NEVER forced to hire back everyone.

Click to expand...

They aren't forced to hire everyone back because they weren't fired in the first place - they are under contract. They aren't even laid off, just furloughed. Contractors and appointees are a separate matter.

You may be thinking of the air traffic controllers who were fired for striking, not because Congress didn't fund their salaries.

"On October 7, 2023, the people of Israel endured their darkest day since the Holocaust. In a coordinated attack, Hamas terrorists crossed into southern Israel, murdering 1,200 civilians, abducting more than 250 hostages, and committing atrocities too horrific to fully describe.
For Christians, this day should never fade into distant memory. Just as September 11 became a defining moment for America, October 7 has become a watershed moment for Israel. It was not only Israel's tragedy but ours as well, since more than forty Americans were killed that day. Their blood was shed alongside their Israeli brothers and sisters." - CBN News.


Do you support Israel or Palestine's hamas?

seeking.IAM said:

I live next door to immigrants. They say they are engineers and fly an American flag. Is that good enough or should I ring their bell and check their papers. What then, sell my house?

Click to expand...

Could you imagine such a utopia? Citizens informing on their neighbors? Hopefully we will reach this point before it's too late! We must defend freedom at all costs!

Welcome to CF!

The Prayer Wall is available if you need more prayer support in the future, that is the place to ask. We’re here for you. May the Lord heal, comfort, and provide for you in your time of distress.

Say it aint so said:

"The number one goal in sentencing should be to protect society." Agreed.

Pardoned J6 Defendants Now Accused of Other Crimes​

Matthew Huttle fatally shot by a sheriff's deputy during a traffic stop on Sunday.
Daniel Ball was rearrested on federal firearm charges while still in custody
David Daniel arrest on charges of possession of child pornography, sexual exploitation, and trafficking of child pornography.
Andrew Taake now wanted in Texas for a 2016 charge of online solicitation of a minor

Click to expand...

Considering that none of the crimes mentioned are even close to what happened during the January 6 riot, I don't see the connection.

If you pick enough people that have a penchant for, let's say antisocial behaviour, a certain number of them will offend in the following time.

I don't see why some people were released while there were still outstanding warrants, though.

Welcome to CF!

@ViaCrucis

Richard T said:

We should be more careful assigning labels to judges without at least looking at their record. This judge has had one notable case overturned on appeal. You will see she took the side of the policeman, and ruled against the protester that was blinded by rubber bullets. The appeals court did not. She likely would have been backed by the Supreme Court, but the case was settled fro a million dollars by the city of Salem.

Her background includes prosecuting narcotics and trafficking cases, serving to help Kenneth Starr in the case against President Clinton, she even questioned Monica Lewinsky personally. She seems to be a first class judge, the kind you would want on any case. After her background working for Starr, was disqualifying her from moving up, she registered as a GOP. She was appointed by Bush as a US attorney, then later by Trump for the U.S. Federal District court. Source: Karin Immergut - Wikipedia

"A jury in October 2022 unanimously found that a Salem police officer was liable for McCrae’s permanent vision loss when he fired rubber bullets while trying to disrupt a downtown demonstration. But U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut six months later dropped the lawsuit after ruling that the officer had no way of knowing he violated the protester’s rights when he shot her with rubber bullets, a legal principle known as qualified immunity.
Now, three judges in the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have reversed Immergut’s ruling and restored the jury verdict."

Source: Protester wins appeal, regains $1 million payout for Salem officer’s excessive force - Salem Reporter

Click to expand...

But.. but.. but . she is not supporting President Trump today. She is a RINO!

Without the massacre of 7 Oct, we would not even be discussing this here. Hamas has brought its own population into this situation with the war. Israel has allowed humanitarian aid to be delivered to Gaza throughout the war. Otherwise, there would be no inhabitants left in the Gaza Strip. And what has prevented the delivery of humanitarian aid is one power: Hamas.

iron

lychee

drying

Don Valley, Ontario

Bradskii said:

It doesn't matter. It's quite an organic process. People realise that the sky hasn't fallen and that all the doom and gloom scenarios were just so much hot air. There'll be extremes on both sides: 'We demand this! They shall not have that!' but in the middle ground, where we live with the vast majority of society, it all becomes the norm.

The same is happening with trans. The 'men in women's sport' and 'sex changes for young children' comprise a tiny portion of the problem.

Click to expand...

Perhaps it's different in Australia, but I don't perceive there being much a middle ground over here on the issue at the moment.

We still have certain states that declare themselves to be "Trans Refuge" states (like Minnesota, home of Gov. Walz who signed the bill for it), where if a minor travels to Minnesota to receive affirming treatment, and the parents try to get them back, the state of Minnesota will refuse to do so, and bars state courts from complying with requests from authorities in other states. (which seems like it flies in the face of the full faith & credit clause of the constitution, but that's a different aspect)

"Middle ground" positions seem to exist only briefly, and then get pushed over into the "right wing" category by progressives.

I would be an example of that.

In the context of this topic.

My position was/is:
There are two genders
There are some people who have a dysphoria in which they feel like they were born in the wrong body
I'll be polite and address them as the opposite gender if it's clear that that's how they're trying to identify
They can use whichever bathroom they want, I'm not concerned about where people poop
Special considerations do need to be made for changing facilities and sports
Minors shouldn't be undergoing these kinds of treatments
Clinical due diligence needs to be exercised to make sure we're separating the "fad" component from actual cases of gender dysphoria, there shouldn't be such a thing as a "fast tracked transition" (socially or medically)

That was my position before, and that's still my position.

My position would've been considered "centrist" (or even a touch center-left) in 2016. But it's been perpetual moving of the goalposts ever since then and now my position gets labelled as "right wing regressive" by the same people today.

Look how much the pronoun rules changed

It went from
"You have to respect which of the two sets of pronouns they want to go by based on which of the two genders they identify with"
to
"Well, actually, there could be more than two, so you'll need to ask people which set they prefer"
to
"Actually, you can't use the word preferred pronouns anymore" ('preferred' is offensive, because it implies it's a choice Ze/Zir is who they are)
to
"Pronouns can change frequently, so you'll need to regularly ask people what their pronouns are"


That was another key distinction between the movements advocating for sexual orientation vs. gender identity.

I don't recall ever being asked at a work conference to introduce myself with (or wear a nametag or Zoom meeting notation advertising) my sexual proclivities.

Simeon

ChubbyCherub said:

Sorry, there is a misunderstanding on my part and I really do apologize.

I just realized I am mixing up this post with another post I made about Israelite slaves/servants. The mention of slaves/servants on this post made me conflate the two!

I do apologize!!!

Click to expand...

No worries!

Chattanooga Choo Choo

Fred Flintstone