Medical school pays $10M settlement after denying religious exemptions to vaccine mandate
- By RileyG
Interesting! Thanks for sharing!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Agreed 100%.I’m amazed by how one’s priorities show themselves so easily. Faith can be manipulated by politics. So very distorted.
Jesus is the chief cornerstone, Jesus was referring to himself after Peters confession that Jesus was the Christ, the son of the living GOD. Its not the church of Peter. Isaiah 28:16 Psalm 118:22 Acts 4:11 1 Peter 2:6 The word used in Greek allows for the use of the word “but” Strongs G2532 . It makes no sense for anyone else but the messiah to be the rock. The church can’t be built on an ordinary man. When Jesus said, but upon this rock, he was referring to himself.Matthew 16:18-19 And I tell you, you are Peter,[a] and on this rock[b] I will build my church, and the powers of death[c] shall not prevail against it.[d] 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven,[e] and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” RSVCE
Jesus and the Apostles spoke Aramaic. The name given to Simon Peter by Jesus is the Aramaic "Kepha," transliterated into "Cephas." "Kepha" means "Rock" in Aramaic. This Aramaic name is preserved within the Koine Greek Biblical text. Thus Jesus said "You are Rock and on this Rock I will build my Church." That is, Jesus used Rock twice in the same sentence. Had Jesus wished to show what you contend he simply could have said "I am Jesus and on this Rock I will build my Church." God renaming someone, such as Abram to Abraham, often comes at an important moment in Biblical history.
I have a card in my wallet that says that I’m Catholic and to call a priest in case of an emergency. I think I got it from Rugged Rosaries.The Register contacted pastors across the country asking the question whether emergency personnel call them to life-threatening situations. For the most part, the answer is No.
When a multi-ton pile of clay covered a steam-shovel fireman in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in early December 1952, a 40-year-old Catholic priest had himself lowered upside down into a hole workers had dug to try to save the man.
“Only the tips of the priest’s heels were visible as his murmured prayers were heard above,” The Boston Globe reported the next day. Only a portion of the man’s leg was visible when the priest first got near him, and by the time workers freed the rest of Elpidio Baia, a 55-year-old father of three, the accident victim had died. But Father John Tierney’s efforts to bring him the last rites of the Church are an example of what used to be common — police and firefighters calling a priest to an accident so he can administer sacraments to the critically injured.
Priests still frequently offer confession, Eucharist and anointing of the sick at hospitals, of course, but not so much at the scenes of accidents. The words “priest called to the scene” and similar phrases appeared in many news stories in the United States during the last century until the late 1960s, when they started tapering off, according to searches of online databases conducted by the Register.
It’s not common anymore.
Continued below.
![]()
‘Someone Call a Priest’: Sacraments at Time of Crisis Are Not Administered as Often as They Used to Be
The Register contacted pastors across the country asking the question whether emergency personnel call them to life-threatening situations. For the most part, the answer is No.www.ncregister.com
Good to know! I heard ginger helps with the stomach!I learned today that a great drink for fighting cold and flu during winter is ginger tea.
We must pray for many more young men to join the priesthood! Also related, many young men and women to join the religious life!I hope my priests don’t feel this way but they aren’t just recently out of seminary. They are probably in their 60’s or 70’s. We did have a younger priest who’s probably in his mid 30’s now who‘d been transferred. He seemed to have adjusted well to priesthood but you never know what people are thinking and feeling.
Hentenza is right on that the Sinai covenant was never relevant to Gentile nations. A mixed multitude came out of Egypt, and it appears they all accepted the covenant. Any Gentile who entered Israel was permitted to become a believer. God never subjected any other Gentile nation to the covenant He gave Israel.Well, you must remember, I read your posts, so I know your stated religious philosophy according to your own words. According to your stated religious philosophy, God's LAW was "NEVER" relevant to the Non-Jew.
Sounds like he was a pretty bad dude in general. Not sure what your point is though.Note too the following from the article:
"DHS says the suspect has an extensive criminal history that spans almost four decades, including an attempted murder charge in 1987, an armed robbery charge in 1991 and a charge of annoying or molesting a victim under 18 in 2007."
I enjoy most home improvement tasks, but caulking has always been something I despise. Today I may have found a runner up... hanging lattice. Using the vinyl lattice definitely made it much more painless. Not to mention, it looks a lot better. And it was a decent day to be outside.
Hopefully now there will be no more critters (or litters of stray kittens) under the deck.
What are you talking about? What positive aspect of Somalian culture and heritage has been presented that says, "Yeah. They bring something to the table to contribute to the United States." "But they value family." Yeah. So did the mafia and Vin Diesel in the "Fast and Furious" movies. So what?Why try? at this point it’s clear you will twist anything positive about Somali immigrants into a negative so you can be right.
Pope Leo is speaking frankly about the wars in the world--that is not spreading fear and terror. I don't think most practicing Catholics viewed Pope Francis as a visionary. I liked his message of mercy. Unfortunately a lot of his statements caused confusion. There is no reason to think Pope Leo is walking a "fine line," realize Jesus cannot be categorized as solely a progressive or traditional.Well, Pope Leo is trying to bring all the world together, but at the same time spreading fear and terror of a third World War....
"Pope Leo on first foreign trip says future of humanity at stake from conflict
Pope Leo XIV has warned that the world should not give into "a heightened level of conflict on the global level", at the start of his foreign trip in Turkey.
"The future of humanity is at stake, said the Pope, urging President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to act as a source of stability because of the need to promote dialogue and stability.
Leo warned that today's wars were like a "third world war fought piecemeal"....
Over recent months, though he has spoken out on some issues dear to him such as the dignity of migrants, he has certainly not been as overtly political as his predecessor could be.
He has walked such a fine line that in some cases both progressives and traditionalists within the Catholic Church have made the case that he supports their school of thought.
It was for similar reasons that cardinals of different persuasions were thought to have coalesced around him at conclave.
Pope Francis was seen as a visionary but one who was not overly worried about creating consensus, leaving behind a somewhat divided Church. Pope Leo has so far operated very differently, gently holding on to some of the progressive ideals of his predecessor while paying heed to the views of traditionalists."Pope Leo visits Turkey and warns humanity at stake from high level of conflict
Looks like he will say whatever is needed to spread ecumenism with the other churches....
Thanks for sharing your private opinion, that God contradicts Himself but I reject that opinion, because the Bible is clear that God does not lie, nor does He contradict Himself, nor does He change His mind, nor does He go back on His promises.What kind of a loving God would torture people for eternity? I would not ... could not worship a god like that.
Theres all kinds of scripture that teaches death is a sleep ... including from Jesus himself.
Meaning of the Metaphor:
- John 11:11-13:
Jesus says of the deceased Lazarus, "Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but I am going to awaken him from his sleep." The disciples misunderstood, thinking He meant literal sleep, but Jesus clarified, "Lazarus is dead".
- 1 Thessalonians 4:13-14:
Paul writes, "Brothers, we do not want you to be uninformed about those who sleep in death, so that you do not grieve like the rest of mankind, who have no hope. For we believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him".- Daniel 12:2:
"Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt".- Matthew 9:24
& Luke 8:52: Jesus tells mourners at a girl's death, "Go away. The girl is not dead but asleep," before raising her.- Acts 7:60:
Stephen's death is described as "falling asleep in the Lord" after he cries out to Jesus.
- Temporary State: Sleep is temporary, implying an eventual awakening (resurrection).
- Unconsciousness: It signifies a state of inactivity and unconsciousness, where the dead know nothing.
- Hope: For believers, it offers comfort, pointing to the resurrection and eternal life in Christ.
- Fifty-four Texts That Describe Death as "Sleep" - Fulcrum7
Feb 5, 2021 — In Job, believed to be the oldest book in the Bible, death is again referred to as sleep: Job 7:21: “Now shall I sleep ...
View attachment 374030
Fulcrum7
- Does My Soul Sleep After Death? | Desiring God
Apr 7, 2016
View attachment 374031
Desiring God
![]()
- In Bible Is Death Like Sleep? : r/Christianity - Reddit
Nov 27, 2017 — saved_son. • 8y ago. Yes - death is like sleep in that we aren't aware of anything or the passage of time. But it's di...
Reddit ·
r/Christianity
- Show all
No it's not opinion ... it's from scripture
- 1 Deuteronomy 31:16: “The Lord said to Moses, Behold, thou shalt sleep with thy fathers.”
- II Samuel 7:12: “When thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers.""
- I Kings 1:21: “When my lord the king shall sleep with his fathers.”
- I Kings 2:10: “David slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 11:21: “David slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 11:43: “Solomon slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 14:20: “Jeroboam...slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 14:31: “Rehoboam slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 15:8: “Abijam slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 15:24: “Asa slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 16:6: “Baasha slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 16:28: “Omri slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 22:40: “Ahab slept with his fathers.”
- I Kings 22:50: “Jehoshaphat slept with his fathers.”
- II Kings 8:24: “Joram slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 10:35: “Jehu slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 13:9: “Jehoahaz slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 13:13: “Joash slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 14:16: “Jehoash slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 14:22: “The king slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 14:29: “Jeroboam slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 15:7: “Azariah slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 15:22: “Menahem slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 15:38: “Jotham slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 16:20: “Ahaz slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 20:21: “Hezekiah slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 21: 18: “Manasseh slept with his fathers”
- II Kings 24:6: “Jehoiakim slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 9:31: “Solomon slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 12:16: “Rehoaboam slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 14:1: “Abijah slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 16:13: “Asa slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 21:1: “Jehoshaphat slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 26:2: “The king slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 26:23: “Uzziah slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 27:9: “Jotham slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 28:27: “Ahaz slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 32:33: “Hezekiah slept with his fathers”
- II Chron. 33:20: “Manasseh slept with his fathers”
In Job, believed to be the oldest book in the Bible, death is again referred to as sleep:- Job 7:21: “Now shall I sleep in the dust”
- Job 14:12: “They shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep”
In the Psalms, death is a sleep:- Psalm 13:3: “Lest I sleep the sleep of death”
- Psalm 90:5: “Thou carriest them away as with a flood; they are as a sleep”
Daniel promises a resurrection of the sleeping dead:- Daniel 12:2: “Many of they that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake”
Jesus described death as “sleep”:- Matthew 9:24: “The maid is not dead but sleepeth.”
- Mark 5:39: “The damsel is not dead but sleepeth”
- Luke 8:52: “She is not dead but sleepeth”
- John 11:11: “Our friend Lazarus sleepeth”
At Jesus’ crucifixion:- Matthew 27:52: “Many bodies of the saints which slept arose”
Luke reiterates I Kings:- Acts 13:36: “David...fell asleep, and was laid unto his fathers”
Paul describes death as sleep:- I Cor. 15:20: “Christ is risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that sleep”
- I Cor. 15:51: “We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed”
- I Thess 4:13: “I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope”
- I Thess. 4:14: “If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus”
I personally like K.E. Hagin's teaching on tongues. While he is known as a faith teacher, his teaching including books on the gifts and tongues in particular show the subject was important to teach. I don't think all Rhema trained pastors though emphasize it as much.
Talking about the ECFs while relying on two quotes hardly establishes anything, the existence of councils and other mediations speaks against the idea that Scripture was exhaustive of God's revelation, and no one argues that Scripture isn't the cornerstone authority. Sola Scriptura goes further than simply asserting Scripture as the chief authority but claims that it is hostile to tradition rather than being a portion(the chief cornerstone, certainly) of a broader tradition.Yes they do. The ECFs considered scripture unique, inspired by God, and the authority for all matters of doctrine. If you have an argument then state it otherwise your opinion does not count.
You have given no answer to it and instead want to move on without it being addressed. I've presented my argument, which is that God-breathed has nothing to do with inspiration when we consider how it was used by contemporaries and near contemporaries of Paul rather than those who post-date Origen. You've provided no response to this challenge, since you want to move onto other topics.Actually I have moved on beyond the question but you are still stuck behind it. Again, either put up an argument or concede that you dont have one.
Thank you for taking the time to share this. I appreciate it.
I think my struggle is a bit different than the one expressed here. My salvation doubts don't stem from external circumstances or emotions but my lack of good fruit (John 15:5-8; Matthew 3:7-10; Matthew 13:22; Galatians 5:22-24) and my failure to repent of certain sins (Romans 2:4-6; 2 Corinthians 7:8-10).

Still, heck of a good dealWell, to be accurate, there's no tax if you're over 60.
Irrelevant. No sabbath here.Not true.
Adam did not "take God's name in vain"
Gen 6-7 shows that even the distinction between CLEAN vs UNCLEAN animals we observed before the flood
Strawman. No one has argued against the 3rd commandment.And no command saying "Do not take God's name in vain" n Gen 1-10 either
The point does not remain. No one kept the sabbath before Moses. There is no verse showing this. If you have one then by all means post it.By not following the point from the very start you miss the entire post
Gen 2 has the Sabbath as even the Sabbath commandment of Ex 20:8-11 explicitly states in vs 11.
The point remains.