Origin of Life
- Creation & Evolution
- 6 Replies
Do you mean that god is alive? Just asking for clarity.Life did not have a beginning, as God did not have a beginning.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you mean that god is alive? Just asking for clarity.Life did not have a beginning, as God did not have a beginning.
We've seen in the past that you don't even watch every video you post. Like the one when Buzz Aldrin apparently said that he did not go to the moon, where in fact he said the complete opposite.And I don't have time too explain every video I post - Sorry.
And why does it have to relate to those who first heard the prophecy? All prophecy is about the Lord Jesus Christ and His purposes. They are not always to be fully understood by those who first heard them.
It still applies.I thought @prodromos mean''''''t someone on here.
Reality.In denial of what ?
With zero factual basis for your denial.If you mean the globe well yes I am, very much so.
But this is a discussion forum, not a cinema. What would be the use of the forum if all we did was post links to videos back and forth to each other?And I don't have time too explain every video I post - Sorry.
Why? Are you running a business? Cooking for a large crowd? You spend so much time on these forums it seems that all you have is free time.And I don't have time too explain every video I post - Sorry.
I don't see a problem, unless you are stating it is a problem for you. Brother Fervent seems par for the course so far, I would agree with him generally speaking on this.That's usually a problem.
Proverbs 18:13 He who answers a matter before he hears it - this is folly and disgrace to him.
I'm not sure what you mean by this.It takes engaging with it to make a determination
I'm going to take the liberty of making a guess here and say it looks as though Fervent is using the word "it" to refer to "the truth."I'm not sure what you mean by this.
If I were to answer this question I would have replied exactly, and I do mean exactly verbatim with this statement or something very close. Maybe it wouldn't be as concise and precise, but meaning-wise, exactly that point.As a Christian, how does one determine what is truth?
So this, essentially, is the short answer to your OP.It takes engaging with it to make a determination
Why does he need to watch a video filled with falsehood?And you need to watch the video.![]()
To make it appear that he had facts behind his claims when in fact he had nothing? He probably assumed that the majority watching his video wouldn't bother checking the links.I know, so why do you think he posted them ?
What evidence do you have that the evidence presented in any of the trials were Trump was found guilty was planted, false or misleading in any way?To "frame" someone means to maliciously and falsely make an innocent person appear guilty of a crime, often by planting misleading evidence or creating a false narrative. It is a deliberate act of setting someone up to be accused of a crime they did not commit.According to the National Registry of Exonerations, over 3,300 individuals have been exonerated since 1989, and false or misleading evidence is among the major causes.
Typical of how you and others insist on a Jewish redemption. Something never said to happen in scripture.I think the Jews who believe in Jesus, Paul is calling the Israel of God in Galatians 6:16.
I have absolutely no idea, as they don't relate to Russia's knowledge or lack of knowledge in 1948 about the earth's shape. Here is the content of the first link, as an example of what I mean. Perhaps you could indicate where that links says anything about Russia's knowledge of the earth's shape:I know, so why do you think he posted them ?
The Nixon Collection
![]()
![]()
Nixon and the People’s Republic of China: CIA’s Support of the Historic 1972 Presidential Trip
This collection marks the 50th anniversary of President Richard M. Nixon’s February 1972 trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) – a landmark event that preceded the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries. This small collection, consisting of three city guides, an atlas, and four leadership profiles, is a subset of the materials CIA produced for President Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger in preparation for the seven-day visit.
City guides were produced on Peking (Beijing), Shanghai, and Hang-Chou (Hangzhou)1, as these cities were part of President Nixon’s tour of the PRC. Each guide included a brief history of the city, contemporary maps and photographs, and descriptions of geography, climates, and points of interest.
CIA also produced an 82-page atlas of the PRC for President Nixon’s trip. The US government distributed more than 4,000 copies to government customers and non-government institutions and libraries, and sold 30,000 copies to the public for a short period after the trip for $5.25, or $35.19 in today’s dollars. This is the first time in fifty years CIA has made the atlas available to the public.
This collection also includes leadership profiles—assessments that CIA provides US Presidents and other policymakers to assist them in understanding their foreign counterparts. The profiles in this collection include Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Mao Tse-tung (Mao Zedong) and Premier Chou En-lai (Zhou Enlai). A profile of Lin Piao (Lin Biao), Vice Chair of the CCP, prepared for this trip is also included in this collection; however, Lin died in a plane crash five months before President Nixon’s visit.
_____________________
1 CIA did not begin using the non-Romanization spelling of Beijing and Hangzhou until 1979. This article provides updated spellings elsewhere in parentheses.
See The Nixon Collection (8 documents/331 pages).
Current/Central Intelligence Bulletin Collection
![]()
Central Intelligence Bulletin
Harry Truman was the first U.S. president to receive a daily intelligence digest. At his direction, the Daily Summary began production in February 1946, and continued until February 1951. President Truman was pleased with the product, but a survey group commissioned by the National Security Council in 1949 was critical of the Daily Summary and issued several recommendations to improve it. The new version, called the Current Intelligence Bulletin, began production on 28 February 1951, and this remained the format of the president's daily digest through Dwight Eisenhower's two terms, although it was retitled the Central Intelligence Bulletin in 1958. The Current/Central Intelligence Bulletin grew longer than its predecessor over time with the addition of more items and more analysis, and would eventually contain more graphics as printing technology improved.
2 January-30 June 1961
The new Kennedy Administration confronted a full array of international issues in 1961. In April, a group of CIA-trained Cuban exiles landed at the Bay of Pigs on the southern coast of Cuba with the goal of overthrowing the Fidel Castro regime and establishing an anti-Communist government. The outnumbered invading force was quickly repelled by Castro's troops. The year's reports were dominated by the worsening Congo crisis, with the fragmentation of the country widening despite the efforts of the United Nations, and US concern over the high tempo of Soviet testing of space vehicles and intercontinental ballistic missiles. The situation in Laos deteriorated, as the Communist Pathet Lao insurgency gained strength against the US-backed Royal Lao government.
The changes at the CIA following the Bay of Pigs included a format update for the president's daily intelligence report. The new version, called the President's Intelligence Checklist (PICL), was first delivered on 17 June 1961. The Central Intelligence Bulletin continued to be produced as a separate publication until 10 Jan 1974, when it was replaced by the National Intelligence Daily. The PICL, however, was the president's primary written intelligence source through the remainder of the Kennedy Administration. The Kennedy PICL reports are available here
This historical release includes: the Central Intelligence Bulletin reports from 2 January-30 June 1961 (2752 pages).
This release is the thirteenth and final release in the Current/Central Intelligence Bulletin series.
See the Current/Central Intelligence Bulletin Collection
Aquiline
![]()
![]()
aquiline adj. of or like the eagle.
Aerial intelligence collection platforms have played a critical role in US national security from the earliest beginnings of aviation. CIA's 1960s OXCART Program and its use of U-2s are examples of collection innovations that have kept US leaders informed about adversaries' capabilities and intentions. Despite their success, however, use of these platforms carried significant risks and repercussions, including detection and even pilot loss, such as the downing of the U-2 flown by Francis Gary Powers in 1960. Ever-evolving research by the CIA led to the development concept of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as collection platforms. An innovative Agency program in the 1960s codenamed Aquiline was the very first to test this concept. Based initially on the study of flight characteristics of birds, Aquiline was envisioned as a long-range vehicle that could safely and stealthily provide a window into denied areas such as the Soviet Union through photography and other capabilities, and would even support in-place agent operations. While it never became operational, the concept proved invaluable as a forerunner to today's multi-capability UAVs.
Learn more about CIA's early eagle (40 documents/289 pages).
The Collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe: A 30-Year Legacy
![]()
The Collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe: A 30-Year Legacy
This collection includes a broad sampling of articles from the National Intelligence Daily—the CIA's principal form of current intelligence analysis at the time—from February 1989 to March 1990. These articles represent much of the Agency's short-term analysis of events unfolding in Central and Eastern Europe as popular opposition to Soviet misrule erupted and quickly surpassed anything the Communist regimes were prepared to understand or to which they could respond. The material also represents a major source of information and insight for US policymakers into what was happening in these countries, where the situation was heading, and how a collapse of Communist rule in Europe and the beginnings of the breakup of the Soviet Union would impact Europe and the United States.
I don't have time to watch all the videos you post.
I don't have time to watch all the videos you post. Why can you not just tell me in your own words how his kit works correctly, when he instructs people to look through the wrong part of the lens?And you need to watch the video.![]()
$1,500,000,000,000 sounds low.All at at cost of $1,500,000,000,000 (and increasing each year) to the taxpayers (and their great-great grandchildren).
"Save money!" Ha!
I have just watched the video, and found that the documents he refers to and shows in the video are nothing like the ones you listed. Not one of your nine links mentions the shape of the earth or what Russia knew or didn't know about it in 1948.
But it has just been explained to you how Rob's kit is based on falsehood. It's no good just saying that he is not a fraud. You need to tell us how you think his kit works accurately in view of what has been explained here about defraction.
Well, it wasn't in the Hebrew Old Testament, and unlike the actual Old Testament books, it is not quoted in the New Testament. I couldn't see any mention of the Apocrypha in the Forum Rules.The Wisdom of Sirach is canonical to the Orthodox Church and is in my Bible. It may not be in your bible, but that only makes it apocryphal by your definition.
I'm sure there's site rules about this.
I have just watched the video, and found that the documents he refers to and shows in the video are nothing like the ones you listed. Not one of your nine links mentions the shape of the earth or what Russia knew or didn't know about it in 1948.If you watched the video these links provide all the info too what Rob is talking about.
No I don’t believe that’s the case. I’ve seen her exhibit more than a high enough level of intelligence to comprehend such a middle school math problem. It’s just denial.
Well, I didn't ask for your opinion to judge you, but you were kind of hiding in the shade brush so I figured I would whistle you out of there. lolIf you want me to 'admit' that it is possible that some babies go to hell, ok. I insist that it is possible, until someone can demonstrate to my satisfaction that babies are born innocent, without the inherent corruption endemic to the rest of us.