Now before anyone comes at me with their nickers in a knot claiming that
John 14:6 says we must believe in Jesus to be saved... let me be the first to remind you that
Jesus is God! Not simply a means too God. He established the fact that He is God in the first part of the verse. Therefore, He is not saying no comes to the Father/God/Me except through the Father/God/Me. This makes absolutely no sense. Why do you need to go through God in order to get too God when going through God means you're already with God?
That’s an incorrect reading, inconsistent with the Patristic understanding shared by all Christians (who apparently you have a disdain for) which is based on a Modalist or Sabellian misinterpretation of the nature of God. We worship one God, in three persons. That said, the persons (the Greek word is prosopon, which could be misinterpreted to mean mask or visage, were it not for the fact that we say each prosopon is hypostatically distinct while sharing the one essence of the Father (homoousios), are distinct, so the Son is not the Father.
In declaring that no one comes to the Father except through Him, Christ is declaring the doctrine of the Incarnation - that through Him, the Father, who is invisible, has made Himself visible, in the Prosopon of His only begotten Son and Word, who, in putting on our human form, remade us in His image on the Cross, and demonstrated God’s willingness to die to save humanity.
The problem with your approach is a confusion of the persons; yes, the Son and the Father and the Holy Spirit are one God, the Holy, Life Giving and Undivided Trinity, but undivided does not mean indistinct; your argument implies God as being one Person, when He is one God abiding in Three persons, a union of infinite and eternal love, that we are called to make ourselves holy icons of, in our relationship with our family, with our neighbor, with the fellow members of the Church (the Ekklesia spoken of by St. Paul and by the Nicene Creed, however you define it ecclesiologically speaking), and with humanity as a whole.
What i love about Eastern Christianity in its various forms (Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrian, Eastern Catholic) is the extreme emphasis we place on love for one another, which one also seeks echoed in some Lutheran thought, for example Soren Kierkegaard sounded very Orthodox when he famously wrote “I need you in order to be me.”
Certainly my life has been enriched not just by my Orthodox coreligionists like
@prodromos @dzheremi @jas3 @FenderTL5 @Chesterton and others on but also by my dear Lutheran friends
@MarkRohfrietsch @ViaCrucis and
@Ain't Zwinglian and my dear Roman Catholic friends
@chevyontheriver @RileyG and
@Xeno.of.athens and by my dear Anglican friends
@Jipsah and
@Shane R among others. It is this component of love in the Holy Trinity that attests to the identity of God in three persons and not the functionally unipersonal God you seem to be describing; you might consider yourself a Trinitarian, but I would respectfully submit that if you think that Christ saying “no one can come to the Father except through Me” is anything other than an attestation of the doctrine of the Incarnation you need to study the Trinitarian concept more carefully, ideally by studying in greater detail rather than simply dismissing outright the doctrines of Christianity, particularly as expressed by the traditional liturgical churches.