Rob Reiner's son, Nick, is in custody as of this writing: Rob And Michele Reiner's Son In Custody After Stabbing Deaths

How sad. May they rest in peace.

André Rieu - Out standing.

Login to view embedded media

JimR-OCDS said:

Fair? He's a priest and took a vow of obedience. When he violates his vow, he should be removed.

Click to expand...

Yup.

Please pray that my son Jakeb will have a good day mind and body and get to his Doctor appointment. Please pray that he can handle the stress and come home happy. Please pray that he even has the courage to go. I also ask that the Doctor can help him and God shows us what to do and that there is nothing seriously wrong with him and that Jesus will put his healing hands upon my son. I pray that him and his dad get there and home safely. Dear God, please let this go well and heal my son. Please Dear God. I love You Dear GOd and I love You Dear Jesus. In Jesus name I pray. Thank you for prayers and God bless you.

The perennially popular representation of the passion, death, and resurrection of Christ, held every Holy Week in the Iztapalapa sector of Mexico City, has been declared a Cultural Heritage of Humanity by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

The decision was made during a UNESCO meeting in New Delhi, India, where the nomination of the Iztapalapa Way of the Cross was reviewed and approved.

Speaking at the event, Edaly Quiroz, deputy director of Mexico’s National Institute of Anthropology and History, said that Holy Week in Iztapalapa is not merely a theatrical performance but a manifestation “of unity, faith, and resilience that brings together thousands of people in a collective exercise of memory, identity, and participation.”

On its website, UNESCO states that this list includes “practices, knowledge, and expressions that communities recognize as part of their cultural identity” and emphasizes the need to protect them for future generations.

Continued below.

Tom8907 said:

Great points!

We don't need to grow spiritually by going on a 'pilgrimage' to Israel, we are fully equipped to spiritually grow through reading God's word, prayer and joining a local Gospel church.

The body of Christ is Israel, not the nation that calls itself Israel.

Click to expand...

I don't think there's anything wrong with going on a pilgrimage to Israel. Some people will draw closer to God just by physically seeing places that are in scripture and walk where Jesus walked. Is it "required", no but I wouldn't condemn people who want to do it either.

Christsfreeservant said:

And let the Holy Spirit guide you into all truth. And do not give your worship and undying devotion to any human being or people group, but give all your worship and devotion to God alone, to Jesus Christ who is the one who gave his life up for us on that cross so that, by God-persuaded faith in him, we will now die to sin and obey our Lord and his commands in practice, and have eternal life with God.

Click to expand...

I agree. People give Pastors/Priests/People FAR too much credit and treat them as if everything they scripturally say is truth instead of letting God teach you. And I also agree that this idea that ethnic Jews are somehow superior/better is gross. It's propping up a country that is 98% lost (and that's being considerate) and condoning behavior that you wouldn't give to anyone else. We should be praying for their salvation, for them to turn to God, for them to see that just because they are born Jewish, does not automatically mean they are the "light of the world". They lost that title when they failed to do what they were supposed to do, which is why the torch was passed to the gentiles.

"Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious." - Romans 11:11

Click to expand...

That doesn't mean Gentiles can now go to heaven, it means that gentiles are now the ones who teach salvation. Hence why Paul was sent to the gentiles and taught how to start churches. Our view towards Israel should be to try and save them so when Jesus comes, He can claim His inheritance that was started all the way back in Exodus and rule and reign from Jerusalem. All of Israel will eventually be saved:

"I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, and in this way all Israel will be saved. As it is written:

'The deliverer will come from Zion; he will turn godlessness away from Jacob. And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sins.'" - Romans 11:25-27

Click to expand...

Meaning, spreading the gospel to the Jews via the gentiles will eventually save them. This is the meaning of the blooming of the fig tree (Matthew 24:32-33, Mark 13:28-29, Luke 21:29-31). When their faith blooms and they finally turn to Christ.

So, if we continually prop up an unsaved nation, that is never going to help save them in the end. We need to pray for their salvation, and back efforts to spread the gospel in Israel.

Q: Who changed the Sabbath?

DamianWarS said:

this is a loaded question. The Sabbath is not Sunday. Sunday is not the Sabbath (so please stop presenting it this way).

Click to expand...

Sadly all the Confessions of Faith of major Christian groups claim you are wrong. I can't ignore all of Christianity just because you don't like their claim that in the first century the Sabbath commandment was edited by traidition to point to Sunday instead of Saturday. This is true of the example list I provide in the signature line in every post I make here.

Toggle signature

Almost every Christian denomination on Earth affirms the continued *"unit of TEN" for Christians today, and the ones below claim the Sabbath commandment was edited to point to week day one in the first century.

[*]The Baptist Confession of Faith section 19
[*]The Westminster Confession of Faith section 19
[*]Voddie Baucham
[*]C.H. Spurgeon
[*]D.L. Moody
[*]Dies Domini by Pope John Paul II
[*]D. James Kennedy
[*]R.C. Sproul
[*]many others as well..

BobRyan said:

The Faith Explained (an RC commentary on the Baltimore catechism post Vatican ii) states on Page 242 that
====================begin short summary
"we know that in the O.T it was the seventh day of the week - the Sabbath day - which was observed as the Lord's day. that was the law as God gave it...'remember to keep holy the Sabbath day.. the early Christian church determined as the Lord's day the first day of the week. That the church had the right to make such a law is evident...

changing the Lord's day to Sunday was in the power of the church since "in the gospels ..Jesus confers upon his church the power to make laws in his name".

Click to expand...

BobRyan said:

page 243

"nothing is said in the bible about the change of the Lord's day From Saturday to Sunday. We know of the change only from the tradition of the Church - a fact handed down to us...that is why we find so illogical the attitude of many Non-Catholics, who say that they will believe nothing unless they can find it in the bible and Yet will continue to keep Sunday as the Lord's day on the say-so of the Catholic church"

I have a new thread on the antinomian idea that some are so fond of. You might enjoy that thread

Antinomianism, definition and a Question "is this you"?

Definition for "Antinomianism" AI: Antinomianism is a term used in Christian theology to describe the belief that, because salvation is granted by divine grace through faith, believers are not bound by the moral law of God, including the Ten Commandments. The word itself comes from the Greek...

www.christianforums.com

Click to expand...

DamianWarS said:

Using the NT to preach a 10 commandment system is counter-gospel

Click to expand...

I have a new thread on your antinomian idea above. You might enjoy that thread

dogs4thewin said:

Trump was stupid if he thought he could deport tens of millions of people in four years anyway. What he should do is just deport if they get caught otherwise breaking the law, OR if they apply for assistance as long as they are pulling their own weight and being productive let them be.

Click to expand...

It’s not four years, but one year. The White House will undergo some reshuffling and restructuring by mid-January next year. It will be interesting to see which side of the political spectrum prevails—whether true believers like Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem succeed, or pragmatists like JD Vence and Marco Rubio, who have ambitions beyond the Trump presidency.

Seventy percent of Hispanic voters disapprove of the Trump administration, reversing Republican gains with this group that have occurred since 1996. This majority of Hispanic voters oppose the current administration’s immigration policy, which they view as affecting them directly in their homes and communities—making it a personal issue unlike economic or other domestic policies. As a result, these voters are unlikely to return to support the GOP in the near future.

Recent Miami mayoral election results indicate that Cuban Americans are shifting away from the GOP for the first time in 60 years, despite historically being steady Republican voters.

In January, three groups within the Republican Party are expected to engage in significant political debate: Trump MAGA supporters such as Stephen Miller, ambitious figures like Vance or Rubio, and Republicans campaigning in swing states.

If Stephen Miller prevails in the debate, it will diminish the GOP's prospects of securing another congressional or presidential victory for at least the next 15 years. This perspective is understood by JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and the majority of Republicans.

If Stephen Miller and MAGA prevail, it won't be another three years; it will be another 13 months. By January 2027, Congress will be controlled by Democrats. Miller and his associates will spend more time appearing before Congress and answering questions than pressuring ICE.

Some Protestant scholars who spoke with CNA welcomed a Vatican document that clarified titles for the Blessed Virgin Mary that discouraged the use of Co-Redemptrix/Co-Redeemer and put limits on the use of Mediatrix/Mediator.

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) issued the doctrinal note Mater Populi Fidelis on Nov. 4. It was approved by Pope Leo XIV and signed by DDF Prefect Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández on Oct. 7.

According to the document, using “Co-Redemptrix” to explain Mary’s role in salvation “would not be appropriate.” The document is less harsh about using “Mediatrix” and says “if misunderstood, it could easily obscure or even contradict” Mary’s role in mediation.

The document affirms Mary plays a role in both redemption and mediation because she freely cooperates with Jesus Christ. That role, it explains, is always “subordinate” to Christ, and it warned against using titles in a way that could be misconstrued to mitigate Christ as the sole Redeemer and sole Mediator.

Catholic reactions have been mixed, with some seeing the clarification as helpful and others defending the titles as consistent with the understanding of Mary’s role as subordinate and asking the Vatican to formally define the doctrines themselves rather than simply issue a note on the titles.

Positive reactions from Protestants​

Continued below.

ThatRobGuy said:

I responded to that point before, linking information about what the NCPC chair had stated.


In September, the commission chair clarified during a public meeting of the NCPC that the approval process is only required for construction, not demolition or site preparation work.

Click to expand...

From the article:

Asked questions about the lawsuit, White House spokesman David Ingle responded with a blanket assertion that Trump is within his “full legal authority to modernize, renovate and beautify the White House — just like all of his predecessors did.”

Thats the heart of the lawsuit: does this enormous and consequential building require any sort of review process before construction? The president, per above, says no. Sensible observers may roll their eyes at the new Lincoln bathroom marble remodel horror, while they acknowledge its the presidents prerogative. But a whole new massive building that completely changes the White House site context? Sensible people are understandably shocked that the pres has sole discretion over such a thing with no review process at all.

Jimmy Lai, the Catholic human rights advocate whose long-running national security trial in China has drawn criticism and charges of persecution, was found guilty on Dec. 15 of multiple violations of China’s national security laws, bringing an end to several years of what advocates have described as a politically motivated show trial against a popular Hong Kong publisher.

Lai, 78, is facing up to life in prison. His sentence will be handed down at a later date.

His U.K.-based attorneys at Doughty Street Chambers on Dec. 15 called the verdict “a stain on a once enviable Hong Kong legal system.” Lead counsel Caoilfhionn Gallagher described Lai as “a brave, brilliant 78-year-old man” convicted in a “vindictive and grossly unfair verdict.”

“After five long years of imprisonment, which violates international law, it is time to end this sham process and release Mr Lai,” she said. “If China fails to release him immediately and unconditionally, the international community must hold China to account.”

Continued below.

much effort has been put into arguing against God's Ten commandments and if not that then a focus on arguing against one of the TEN.

James 2 claims those two are the same thing.

Do you agree with James 2?

LizaMarie said:

Things really went south with COVID, I blame Trump who bungled it at first, to Biden who mandated the COVID vaccines. As someone else upthread said Covid got really politicized on both sides. I don't think the vaccines should have been mandated, and they were rushed out too fast. So while probably generally safe, people could be excused for not trusting them. I have not had a Covid shot or booster in almost 3 years and don't plan to for awhile.

Click to expand...

I had to get the COVID shot because my son was selected to perform at Carnegie Hall in February 2022, right at the height of the COVID insanity. Mandates were everywhere. I had very negative reactions to both doses of the COVID shots and I will NEVER get another one.

LizaMarie said:

Polio, MMR and DTAP and Hep B vaccines however have years of proven safety records, and are far safer than the diseases they prevent. Of course there are people who can't tolerate vaccines. I have a friend who can't take any vaccines.

Click to expand...

Mandates were ALWAYS going to breed distrust. Even a rank amateur like me could spot that coming a mile away. I said on this forum all the way back in early 2021 that what was at stake was trust in all vaccinations. Trust is key in public health. That trust was violated in spades during COVID.

People got a look behind the curtain at just how much control the pharmaceutical industry has over our healthcare. When booster shots are approved on the basis of increased antibody titers in eight mice and your top two vaccine regulators at the FDA resign in protest, something is very wrong. And then you start to wonder, if they're willing to forego evidence to approve these vaccines, which brought an immense financial windfall to the industry, what else are they willing to do? And if you start digging, you won't like what you find.

Five men have been arrested on suspicion of planning an Islamist-motivated vehicle attack at a Christmas market in southern Germany. The suspects had intended to drive a car into a crowd, aiming to kill or injure as many people as possible, according to authorities.

Three Moroccans, an Egyptian and a Syrian were detained Friday on suspicion of planning to drive a vehicle into a Christmas market in the Dingolfing-Landau district of Bavaria, the BBC reported. Investigators said the exact market has not been identified, but it is believed to be in the area northeast of Munich.

Prosecutors said formal arrest warrants were issued for four men, with the fifth held in preventative custody, according to DW. The arrests followed surveillance that allegedly uncovered discussions among the men about using a vehicle to carry out the attack.

Continued below.

stevevw said:

We would be asking the Egyptians and the ancients themselves directly. How else. If its based on direct conscious experience. Then just like any experience of nature and reality we ask the experiencer. We don't deny their experiences. Their beliefs and their own stories about their experiences.

This is the very thing I am talking about in how western scientific materialism denied and destroyed indigenous knowledge. They did not believe them and dismissed it as superstition or make believe.

So now we are left with a dilemma. The truth of indigenous and ancient knowledge by way of direct experiences. Or the material sciences who demand evidence because they believe the only true knowledge is empiricle.

Yes and the context has been verified. It was always existing and part of the original works. Now one in 1934 went around melting stones all over Peru lol. Just like no one went around in the mid 20th century putting machine cuts in the stones all over Egypt.

So what do you say now. Was this a natural event or was this human made.

Not necessarily. If for example we establish that the stones in the Temple example in Peru are verified as vitrified and human made. Then if we verify another in say Egypt or say Turkey with similar features and signatures.

We can then begin to see a pattern in other vitrified alters, or monuments in other places around the world from around that same time. Even though we have not specifically checked each work the building evidence of similarities lends weight to it being the same thing. That there was common knowledge around the world in how to soften and melt stone.

The same wwith the Fortress melted stones. They have a unique signature to them. We can immediately tell the difference between naturally forming and man made. They have a specific signature that is unusual to the man made as opposed to natural. You could identify them without having to test them.

I am not talking about what they may show later. I am talking about the first step which is observational science. You have to acknowledge whats before your eyes before you can investigate what it is lol.

If the observation looks like a machine cut then you first have to acknowledge it looks like a machine cut. If you said it looked like something else that it did not look like then your biasing the entire investigation by denying the observations. That is why I spend so much time on images and allow people to be the scientists initially. To see if they first even acknowledge the clear and obvious observations.

Click to expand...

It doesn't look like a machine cut to me.

stevevw said:

You even alluded to this observation when you said that maybe someone from 1934 made the vitrified stones. You acknowledged the observations that it looked like vitrified stones.

Click to expand...

Or very well polished stone.

stevevw said:

So that is all I am first saying. Then we can establish whether or not this is the case.

You are skeptical and say it may be a forgery. This is similar to the provenance of the vases. Another poster implied a machine cut example was a 20th century forgery.

Click to expand...

Why not, how did they exclude that possibility?

stevevw said:

But this is where the overall evidence comes in. If we can acknowledge that we see a common signature of vitrified and softened stones around the world. Then it begins to look like more than nature and more man made without having to check everyone.

Click to expand...

Everyone needs to be checked.

stevevw said:

I can't remember the context I said this. But its usually a general statement of what has been happening in the thread and not just you or you in particular. That its taken all these pages to even get people to acknowledge the images shows it has been resisted.

If people did acknowledge the images for what they are then we would have been well down the track to establishing whether this was man made or natural. Referring back to my point. If it was acknowledge that there are common vitrified and softened stones in ancient works around the world. Then we would not bneed peer review lol. Thats good enough to say its vitrified, and man made for obvious reasons because its been acknowledged lol. Its self evident.

Unless you want to claim the rediculous idea that it was a big coincident that these vitrified stones just happen to be on the works and not the surrounding areas around them and they just happened to occur specifically in these Temples and works by accident lol.

Click to expand...

The only vitrified stone supported by an article that you have presented have been made without any appeals to ancient technology or lost knowledge.

stevevw said:

Ah then tell me or explain to me how they don't look like machine marks and look more like the traditional method. But don't just say, "no they are not or nothing and dismiss them.

Click to expand...

My limited experience (just hobby cutting of small figurines) is that you cut quite well with abrasive means in stone.

stevevw said:

Because if you did then I could say what about this and that. Then you come back and we work it out as to what is the most reasonable explanation according to the evidence. For example this is one I linked as obvious to see what people say. Mostly its ignore, some say a modern forgery thus acknowledging it looks like machining. But lets see what you say now we are allowing such discussion.

Tell me how this does not look like machining and how it looks like it was made by the orthodox method or pounding, grinding and using a big straight edged copper saw.

THis is from around the Giza pyramid and I linked the video earlier showing it onsite. There are many like this so please don't dismiss it because you think there is not fact to its existence as part of ancient Egypt. As it is and I am not going to go through the whole thing of reciting references.

Click to expand...

If it is not in peer-reviewed journals, but something without context it is of little value.

stevevw said:

View attachment 374526 View attachment 374527

Do you understand or have investigated the difference in the signatures abrasive sawing has to machine cutting. Like the example above. Can a hand saw with abrasion leave such a sharp and fine lip.

Click to expand...

Can it? I think so. Also there is no sense of scale in these pictures.

stevevw said:

If its abrasion then its grinding out the stone and not cutting it sharply.

Its so basic that this is why I question that anyone has actually stopped to carefully look at the images and see what is before their eyes lol. I don't think they have. Otherwise they would not be claiming a copper saw and abrasive grinding because they look nothing like that.

Look heres others which I have linked before with their sources. All from around the pyramids. Tell me how a copper saw at least 4 or 5 mm thick and straight could leave a fine arc edge thats thinner than the thickness of the saw. Let alone the extra stone ground out by the abrasive cutting method.

View attachment 374529 View attachment 374528

View attachment 374531 View attachment 374532

Its not a case of stopping them. Its shooting down the investigation as nothing, as just conspiracy that is the issue. I have had to fight to even have this acknowledged lol.

Click to expand...

Then they keep building their case with good methods and keep trying to get it published, are their rejection rate actually high?

stevevw said:

The tests and experiments I linked were dismissed as nothing that lends support for advanced knowledge and tech. Rather than acknowledge they could be the preliminary evidence that leads to supporting such advanced knowledge.


The determination was already made that this was nothing that lends support. Otherwise it would be acknowledged that what is being claimed could potentially be correct lol. Thus my case is supported.

Click to expand...

This is just some convoluted thinking, either the data supports the hypothesis or not.

stevevw said:

Ok I can see you are more reasonable and open which is good. You do ask basic questions and the fact that we are able to get to a point where we can look at images and be honest with what we see in front of us is a good start as this is step one to acknowledge the observations.

Click to expand...

You mistakenly think that I agree with you on what the images show.

stevevw said:

Yes but when someone says that and they don't provide any explanation or evidence that this is the case. They are more or less fobbing off the issue. Then demanding that I provide peer reviwed science lol. Its an impossible predicament as only one side is having to account for their claims.

Click to expand...

This have to be a misunderstanding, if you claim that it is a machine cut then it is you that have to prove it. I am not an experimental archaeologist, I am perfectly clear that my personal view is nothing else than my personal view.

stevevw said:

Thats ok provided the same rules apply and the pushback honestly acknowledges what we are looking at. Then gives an explanation for their claim with the same level of evidence demanded of me. Then yes this is good.

Click to expand...

No, I give you my personal view. If all you are saying is that they look like machine cuts to you, then I'm ok with that but you seem to imply that your view is supported by the evidence. Then the normal way is to publish it in an appropriate journal and get it into the orbit of the subject matter specialists. That is the arena where the ideas will get vetted and discussed by experts.

stevevw said:

Not sure what you mean.

See you even admit that this is a subjective feeling and belief. You cannot be sure or confident of your own position.

Click to expand...

I don't think you should be confident in your position because I don't think you have provided evidence for it. I'm not confident in my position on archaeological matters, because I normally do medical genetics and statistics. There is more than a small lack of actual statistical tests in what you have presented so far, so it is very difficult to determine how likely or unlikely something is.

stevevw said:

Which to me sort of supports my point that skeptics are not really looking at things and dealing with what is right before their eyes to begin with.

Click to expand...

How does this support your point?

stevevw said:

The resistence is not based on objective facts or science but a feeling and belief. Ironically skeptics accuse those who support the idea of advanced knowledge as having some unfounded belief and no factual evidence. Which shows its all about a persons belief in how they see the evidence.


No ancients are alive form the Old and New Testiment but todays Christians accept their testimony and experiences in the stories they have passed down.

Click to expand...

Yes, but written stories are not testimony without any means to corroborate who wrote them down.

stevevw said:

Yes I think its about their thinking. The way they gained knowledge. This was obtained differently to how material science gains knowledge as a 3rd party measure. The ancients gained their knowledge from direct conscious experiences.

Click to expand...

In contrast to sub- or non-conscious experience? Or non-direct conscious experience?

stevevw said:

Perhaps a shortcut to the same knowledge material science is just getting to know.

This is the big question lol. The important thing is to be open to whatever. That material science is not the sole truth as to knowledge. Thus we all should be open to transcedent knowledge and truths because we actually believe and live that in reality.

Click to expand...

I don't believe I have ever gained any transcendent knowledge or truth.

stevevw said:

On the one hand we have empiricle facts and on the other we have lived reality.

Click to expand...

Lived reality is inherently empirical.

stevevw said:

Do you think our lived experiences, beliefs and reality are also a kind of fact or truth in the world. But just measured in a different way such as qualitatively. Rather than quantatively. Why cannot direct experiences be something real.

Click to expand...

Of course it is, all experiences are real. Whether or not they correspond to something objective varies.

stevevw said:

Yes and I think some have been doing this. Looking at the cultural aspect. The beliefs and stories in more detail to try and learn how they thought. How this related to their practices and lived reality.

I see it a bit like understanding the stories in the bible and how they were lived out in reality. The stories were not just myths but had knowledge that transcends the material sciences. Yet is still real knowledge as it has had a real affect on the world. It influences peoples behaviour.

Click to expand...

Psychology and sociology studies how peoples thoughts and experiences influence their behaviour, these subjects are by now well established scientific fields (not strictly appropriate in this sub-forum though).

stevevw said:

I wasn't just talking about those. But the whole stone softening, melting and weakening topic. There was a paper from a uni presented. Can;t remember if peer reviewed. But that is irrelevant as this was academic level testing from a university. I think referenced by peer reviewed papers. They tested the vitrified surfaces and found unnatural minerals.

Click to expand...

I'm going to need peer-reviewed articles or at least something in academic press at this point.

stevevw said:

Another found unnatural minerals in the facia stones on the pyramid.

Click to expand...

Bob Crowley said:

You may be right, but even the Jerusalem Post identified him as Moslem. Whether they did their own research, or merely quoted others remains to be seen.

Click to expand...

The Jerusalem Post article is correct.

Hero who wrestled gun from terrorist says he’d do it again despite being ‘riddled with bullets’

Ahmed, a Muslim, arrived in Australia in 2006 from Syria. The 44-year-old tobacco shop owner is the father of two daughters aged five and six.

essentialsaltes said:

Hong Kong pro-democracy campaigner and media tycoon Jimmy Lai has been found guilty of colluding with foreign forces under the city's controversial national security law (NSL).

The 78-year-old UK citizen, who has been in jail since December 2020, pleaded not guilty. He faces life in prison and is expected to be sentenced early next year.

Lai used his now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper as part of a wider effort to lobby foreign governments to impose sanctions on Hong Kong and China, the court found.

Lai, one of the fiercest critics of the Chinese state, was a key figure in the pro-democracy protests that engulfed Hong Kong in 2019. Beijing responded to the months-long demonstrations, which sometimes erupted into violent clashes with police, by introducing the NSL.

The law was enacted without consulting the Hong Kong legislature and gave authorities broad powers to charge and jail people they deemed a threat to the city's law and order, or the government's stability.

Lai was accused of violating the NSL for his role in the protests and also through his tabloid Apple Daily, which became a standard bearer for the pro-democracy movement.

Lai's trial came to be widely seen as yet another test of judicial independence for Hong Kong's courts, which have been accused of toeing Beijing's line since 2019, when it tightened its control over the city.

Hong Kong authorities insist the rule of law is intact but critics point to the hundreds of protesters and activists who have been jailed under the NSL - and its nearly 100% conviction rate as of May this year.

[Lai's] journey as a democracy activist began after China brutally crushed pro-democracy protests in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in 1989.

Lai started writing columns criticising the massacre and went on to launch a string of popular pro-democracy publications, including Apple Daily and Next.

See Also (2021):

Hong Kong police raid newspaper offices, arrest editors, executives under security law

Police on Thursday raided the Apple Daily newspaper, known for its support for Hong Kong's democracy movement, and arrested five executives, including three top editors, on suspicion of violating the city's national security law. Authorities also froze the tabloid's assets. The early-morning...

www.christianforums.com

Click to expand...

This is fully expected but so sad. Well, China is totalitarian, so of course anyone who objects in any way to totalitarianism is an enemy of China.

Our heroic Catholic Church has a secret deal with China to protect the interests of Catholics in China. So all is well. I guess.

I

ThatRobGuy said:

Correct, because unless time travel gets invented...

People from 1000 years ago can't travel to the future and impact me in anyway.

We're talking about implications for current policy prescriptions, which means we should be focusing on generations that are still...y'know...in the here and now.

Click to expand...

If Christians can't exercise the degree of social discipline in this country that they desire to, what makes you think that Muslims will be able to?

AI Overview


Yes, according to the Gospels,
Jesus treated the early chapters of Genesis (like Adam, Eve, Noah, the Flood) as real, historical events, using them as factual references for theological and moral teaching, such as defining marriage from "the beginning of creation" (Mark 10:6, quoting Genesis 1:27, 2:24) and referencing Noah's Flood (Matthew 24:37-39). While He treated the figures and events as historically true, the text itself doesn't detail howlong creation took, focusing more on God as the Creator, leaving interpretations of literal timeframes a matter for later theological discussion.
Examples of Jesus referencing Genesis as history:

• Adam and Eve: When discussing divorce, Jesus pointed to the creation of man and woman "from the beginning of creation," directly referencing the Genesis account of Adam and Eve as foundational.
• Noah and the Flood: He described the days of Noah and the global Flood as historical reality, using them as parallels for future judgment.
• Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, & Lot:Jesus referred to these patriarchs as actual historical persons, as noted in Matthew 8:11 and Luke 17:28-32.

Interpretation:

• Factual Basis: For many Christians and theologians, Jesus's direct citations confirm that He viewed Genesis as reliable history, not mere myth or poetry.
• Focus on What, Not When: His references often emphasize the truth of the events (God created humanity, a global flood occurred) rather than specifying the durationor mechanism (like the age of the Earth), leaving room for different views on scientific timelines within a belief in Genesis's historical framework.

The Catholic Church also teaches Adam and Eve were real historical people.

In July, a team of scientists assembled on a video call to study an anomalous wobble in a data curve. This blip didn’t signal a new particle decay in an atom smasher or the passage of a planet across the face of a distant star. Instead, it was a surprising decline in a quantity that has grown relentlessly throughout the Industrial Age: the amount of planet-warming greenhouse gases dumped by humanity into the atmosphere each year.

For several years now, peak carbon—the point when humanity starts to emit less carbon dioxide (CO2) than it did the year before—has lingered just out of reach, as overall emissions have crept up by some 1% each year. Although Europe and the United States reached peak carbon years ago, society’s collective load on the atmosphere has resisted any lasting downward trend, though it did drop briefly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

fhansen said:

Because they both understood that, while the law was incapable of actually producing holinesss in us, it was nonetheless holy, right, spiritual and good as per Rom 7, testifying to another righteousness that could actually accomplish what the law could not. So the OC was made obsolete only because the NC could actually produce the authentic obedience that the old could not. Basil of Caesarea, a 4th century bishop, sheds some light here:
“If we turn away from evil out of fear of punishment, we are in the position of slaves. If we pursue the enticement of wages, . . . we resemble mercenaries. Finally if we obey for the sake of the good itself and out of love for him who commands . . . we are in the position of children.”

Click to expand...

the OC points to Christ and everything the OC was, Christ is better; therefore looking to Christ over the precepts of the law is a better way. People seem to think this is too abstract and we need a more concrete list to follow, this is what the holy spirit is for. but the NT is full of examples of Christian living, all aligned to Christ's law, and even explicitly saying to love your neighbour as yourself. This is the line the NT authors quote but it is a quote from Christ and includes first to love God with all your heart then love each other as yourself. Where this easily aligns with most of the 10, the 4th commandment is not a natural product and this seems to trouble people.

This forces us to critically look at the 4th commandment. After doing so, we must admit it is ritually based and there is no NT commandment to keep it. There is also no biblical teaching that bifurcates law, the 10 are a part of a greater covenant, and if we bring in 1 (or 10) we bring in them all because they are not meant as a single unit. When we attempt to separate the 10 from the rest of law, we do so without biblical support. what is all of them? well start reading Exodus 20 (when the 10 are first introduced) and keep going to Exodus 24 (where the blood covenant is made). that very clearly shows the covenant is greater than the 10 alone and that the 10 do not stand apart.

I have no issue with keeping the day, I myself defacto keep the day out of tradition and habit, but I do not see it as a NT commandment and gatherings in the NT has a different focus. There is no commandment to rest in the NT outside of seeking spiritual rest from Christ. Gatherings also do not have a focus of rest and are aligned to community and teaching/preaching. Simply saying "its the God's law" has no logic as it's all his law, not just the 10. Mat 5:17 the context is establishes "the law and the prophet" Jesus is not trying to isolate the 10. what he says he says regarding all the law.

There are also explicit verses to speak against forcing the practice of keeping days. You may interpret these differently, but it builds an expectation for specific teaching regarding the keeping sabbath if it were to be valued in the same way as the old and that teaching is missing. Based on how the NT presents it, there is no reason why we should look at the 4th commandment as a requirement of the faith.

Hail Mary,
Full of Grace,
The Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou among women,
and blessed is the fruit
of thy womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary,
Mother of God,
pray for us sinners now,
and at the hour of our death.
Amen

Mercy Shown said:

The question was whether a Sabbath keeper has more genuine faith than a believer who worships on Sunday. That is a question about the nature of saving faith, not about the authority of Scripture.

Click to expand...

How can one separate God's saving faith from the authority of what God says, is not found in our Bibles. This is saying faith leads one away from the authority of God's Word or law, which is the opposite of faith Rom3:31. We are told it is unbelief, sin and rebellion Heb3:7-19

Jesus addressed traditions verses the commandments of God. Mark 7:7-13 Mat15:3-14. He said those who keep their traditions over the commandments of God makes the word of God no effect, worships Him in vain and those who teach and follow these teachings ends up in a ditch.

Considering Sunday is not a commandment of God, it does not come with the power of God's blessings Isa59:2 Exo20:11 and sanctification Eze20:12 Gen2:3, it is a tradition of man that leads many people away from staying faithful to what God said to Remember Exo20:8-11 I think Jesus addressed this scenario plainly.