New Posts

timothyu · 2025-12-11T18:24:41-0600

narnia59 said:
Or did their decision impact the nature of their progeny

No, their hybrid human nature did. It was only a matter of time before they would put their will ahead of the will of the Father, and so it goes with all. Human instinct is hereditary, come factory installed.

d taylor · 2025-12-11T18:21:10-0600

Dan Perez said:
Ans SORRY you can not believe , BUT

# 1 FOR. // GAR is a CONJUNCATION

# 2 WITH THE HEART /// KARDIA. is. I the DATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 3. MAN BELIEVES. ///. in. the PRESENT TENSE in. the PASSIVE VOICE means CHRIST is working. on all unbelievers

in. the INDICATIVE MOOD , means you better believe IT

# 4 UNTO /// is a PREPOSTION

# 5 RIGHEOUSNESS. /// DIKAIOSYNE. is in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINFULAR

# 6 AND ///. DE is a CONJUNCATION

# 7 WITH THE MOUTH /// STOMA in the DATIVE CASE , in the SINGULAR in. the NEUTER , meaning MALE or FEMALE

# 8 CONFESSION. IS MADE ///. HOMOLOGEO. in vv. the PRESENT TENSE , meaning IN. THE NOW , in the INDICATIVE MOOD

meaning you better believe IT !!

# 9 UNTO /// EIS is a PREPOSITION

# 10 SALVATION ///. SOTEHA. in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR.

THE BEST TO YOU !!

dan p

-

You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me. But you are not willing to come to Me that you may have life.

timothyu · 2025-12-11T18:19:47-0600

1Tonne said:
You’re correct that the contexts differ, but the point is linguistic and theological, not narrative. Scripture repeatedly uses “death” metaphorically to describe spiritual ruin or separation from God, not mere non-existence:

Then the point only serves man's religion and not God. People often confuse the two forms of Christianity.

Bob Crowley · 2025-12-11T18:15:59-0600

Years ago they used to recommend using a torniquet, but that restricted blood flow to the limb below the binding.

This sometimes led to other medical problems, so they devised the pressure bandage idea.

On a morbid note, the former OIC of our local ambulance station said the most emotional fatality for him was due to a snake bite when he was stationed in Townsville years ago.

A young girl had been playing in the backyard (on a swing maybe) when she jumped off and landed on a Taipan which was hidden in long grass.

It struck her on the chest about five times. She died in minutes.

On a happier note, I heard a Baptist pastor say that when he was a young chap following his father in long grass on their farm he suddenly found he just could not take another step. He said it was like being held in a giant hand - he just couldn't move, no matter what he did.

His father came back to see why he was just standing there in mid-stride. As he did so he saw a death adder in the exact spot where his son would have taken his next step.

They're the fastest striking snake in the world.

Obviously God had plans for the son to become a pastor, and protected him. As the pastor said he literally couldn't move.

Why God protected him, and not the young girl was God's choice.

bbbbbbb · 2025-12-11T18:15:49-0600

Bro.T said:
So if you say that you know God, but you don’t keep his commandments, lets see what the Lord had specially written for you. It says in (1John 2:3-4) (v.3) And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. (v.4) he that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. Then the book says in Revelation 21: 8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

These are hard words coming from the word of God, I would take heed and start keeping these Commandments. But of course it's your choice.

Well, I guess that leaves Rahab out.

walter45 · 2025-12-11T18:14:01-0600

1. Do we let the words in the scriptures speak for themselves?
2. Or do we explain in so many words that scriptures mean something else?

Ephesians 2:8-9, Titus 2:11
Hebrews 5:9
Mark 13:13
John 3:5
John 3:16
Matthew 28:20 and 1 John 2:3-6
2 Thessalonians 1:8

Which scriptures are true? Shouldn't we consider all these scriptures to be true, or does one scripture cancel out the other scripture?

What if we used all these scriptures in our understanding?

Once Jesus was made perfect he became the source of Eternal Salvation for all who obey him, and it is by God's grace, his undeserved kindness that we are saved, we should endure to the end, we should get baptized, we should believe in Jesus and observe all his commands, those who do not know God and Obey the good news of our Lord Jesus will be punished.

BPPLEE · 2025-12-11T18:12:21-0600

FreeinChrist said:
Sad to see folks repeat lies.

Per AI (Google)

No, the claim that U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar married her brother is a persistent conspiracy theory that has been widely debunked by multiple fact-checkers and investigations. There is no credible evidence to support it.
The allegation first appeared in 2016 on an anonymous internet forum and was later amplified by conservative blogs and political commentators, including President Donald Trump.
Here is a summary of the facts:

Denials Omar has consistently called the rumors "absolutely false and ridiculous".

Investigations Reputable news organizations like the Star Tribune and non-partisan fact-checkers such as PolitiFact and Snopes have investigated the claims and found them to be unfounded.

Documentation Records from Omar's family's 1995 entry into the United States list her as the youngest of seven children, and the name of the man she supposedly married (Ahmed Nur Said Elmi) does not appear in those documents as a sibling.

FactCheck.org has catagorized the story as untrue.

So please stop with the misinformation.

Thete is a recent article in The Daily Mail regarding this but that's about the equivalent of The National Enquirer

ThatRobGuy · 2025-12-11T18:10:55-0600

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/11/politics/indiana-senate-republicans-redistricting-trump

Indianapolis —
The Indiana Senate on Thursday voted down a plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts to produce two more GOP-friendly seats, rejecting President Donald Trump’s months-long campaign to pressure the Republican supermajority in the deep-red state to bend to his will.

The 31-19 vote saw 21 Republicans join 10 Democrats in voting down the proposed map that would have positioned the GOP, which currently holds seven of Indiana’s nine US House seats, for a sweep of all nine seats in next year’s midterm elections.

I wonder how much of this "Hoosier defiance" from the Indiana state GOP could be a little bit of payback for the way Trump treated (presumably) their former friend, and pretty popular GOP governor, Mike Pence.

fhansen · 2025-12-11T18:10:20-0600

Dikaioumenoi said:
You still have yet to address my refutation of this position. Who does the "him" refer to in the clause, "and I will raise him up on the last day"? There's no disputing that it refers to those who actually come to Jesus. But who comes to Jesus? Grammatically, what is John saying here?

οὐδεὶς δύναται ἐλθεῖν πρός με ἐὰν μὴ ὁ πατὴρ ὁ πέμψας με ἑλκύσῃ αὐτόν, κἀγὼ ἀναστήσω αὐτὸν ἐν τῇ ἐσχάτῃ ἡμέρᾳ

"No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up on the last day."

The αὐτόν who is raised on the last day is the same αὐτόν who is drawn. Grammatically, the pronoun in ἀναστήσω αὐτόν must refer back to the nearest suitable antecedent, which is the οὐδεὶς δύναται… ἐὰν μὴ ὁ πατὴρ ἑλκύσῃ αὐτόν clause. In other words, the "him" who is raised is the "him" who is drawn. The text itself makes no grammatical space for subdividing the referent into two groups -- those enabled to come, versus those who actually do.

Your reading requires precisely that distinction -- that some of the "him" drawn are not the "him" raised. But the syntax does not supply a second referent for αὐτόν to latch onto. You must therefore import an unspoken category. In other words, you're making an interpretive move that presupposes the very point you want to prove. Meanwhile, the surrounding context (vv. 37, 39, 65) consistently grounds coming in sovereign initiative, which strongly argues against any basis for that presupposition.

Again, consider the contrapositive.

Let p = "one can come to me"
Let q = "the Father draws him"
Let r = "I will raise him up"

The verse, as stated, reads: "not p if not q, and r," which, stated formally in symbolic logic, is (-q --> -p) ^ r

The contrapositive of this is (p --> q) ^ r, which reads:

"If one can come to me, then the Father has drawn him, and I will raise him up."

Who does Christ promise to raise? The one drawn. Who is the one drawn? The one enabled to come.

"If Sam is able to come to me, then the Father has drawn Sam, and I will raise Sam up."

This is a promise of final salvation based on the Father's sovereign act in drawing/enabling individuals. The natural implication of this is that this act of enablement leads effectually to coming to Christ. It is a transformation of the heart. This comports with John 6:37: "All that the Father gives me will come to me."

You're trying to get way to much distance out of a single verse which was only meant to serve as a concise summary of the Way, of how one is saved. Salvation is directly related to one's nearness to God-coming to and being united with Him-that's why Jesus came, to reconcile and restore broken relationship between man and God.

Sam was enabled to come. Sam came. God will raise him up. Nothing conflicts there with the fact that Sam also must remain in Him, Sam must persevere, Sam must overcome sin, Sam must make effort to be holy-or else Sam won't be one of those who are raised simply because he once responded and came. And that's all consistent with Scripture, early church teachings, and the ECFs.

probinson · 2025-12-11T18:09:58-0600

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T18:01:01-0600

Bro.T said:
It’s starts off with repentance, that’s one of the first thing Jesus says when he got started in his ministry, Jesus says in Luke 5:32 I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. Stop sinning is the first forms of repentance, that's a lot work on it's on. Learning how to get self out the way. Now, Grace is nothing more than a free gift. And that free gift is our access back to the tree of life (Jesus) which Adam caused us to lose by disobeying God. Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (Romans 5: 12) But to maintain your grace you must keep the law. (1John 3:4) Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Now we have just read the biblical definition of sin, the transgression (breaking) of the law (commandments.) It doesn’t matter what you or I think sin is, it’s what God says sin is that counts.

And per your belief and admission those that don’t keep the sabbath are sinners and if they don’t repent will go to hell. So much for salvation by the free grace of God through faith in the Son. You are a legalist and promote a works salvation.

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T17:50:05-0600

SabbathBlessings said:
That's what's faith is about, obeying God,

No. Faith is belief in the Lord and who He is. Here is the definition pistis which if faith in Greek and the definition used for the purposes of scripture.

Strong’s Definitions
πίστις pístis, pis'-tis; from G3982; persuasion, i.e. credence; moral conviction (of religious truth, or the truthfulness of God or a religious teacher), especially reliance upon Christ for salvation; abstractly, constancy in such profession; by extension, the system of religious (Gospel) truth itself:—assurance, belief, believe, faith, fidelity.

KJV Translation Count — Total: 244x
The KJV translates Strong's G4102 in the following manner: faith (239x), assurance (1x), believe (with G1537) (1x), belief (1x), them that believe (1x), fidelity (1x).
Outline of Biblical Usage

conviction of the truth of anything, belief; in the NT of a conviction or belief respecting man's relationship to God and divine things, generally with the included idea of trust and holy fervour born of faith and joined with it
1. relating to God
  1. the conviction that God exists and is the creator and ruler of all things, the provider and bestower of eternal salvation through Christ
2. relating to Christ
  1. a strong and welcome conviction or belief that Jesus is the Messiah, through whom we obtain eternal salvation in the kingdom of God
3. the religious beliefs of Christians
4. belief with the predominate idea of trust (or confidence) whether in God or in Christ, springing from faith in the same
fidelity, faithfulness
1. the character of one who can be relied on

SabbathBlessings said:
disobedience to God and His commandments is rebellion, sin unbelief and disobedience Heb3:7-19.

No. You are again reading your pet doctrines into scriptures. Heb. 3 speaks about the disobedience and disbelieve of Israel which caused them the “rest” of entering into the promise land.

SabbathBlessings said:
I already posted the words of Jesus, if one won't believe His plain teachings, nothing I can say is gonna make a difference.

No. You posted your interpretation of the words of Jesus. Big difference. You still believe that salvation is by faith plus works of the law.

I know your church follows the dietary laws. Is it a sin not to follow the dietary laws?

Factotum · 2025-12-11T17:43:15-0600

durangodawood said:
I think you mean incompetence drives the bus. (Because, generally, competence has a lot to lose signing on to this corrupt clown show.)

This was all strategic by the Trump DOJ, in order to beat the statute of limitations deadline on charging Comey. Kalligan beat it by 36 hours I heard.
Now that Kalligan is disqualified, the Court gives them several weeks to replace her and reinstate the charges.

It was very clever, by Bondi.

d taylor · 2025-12-11T17:36:35-0600

-

Larry Bird

Akita Suggagaki · 2025-12-11T17:20:06-0600

Dale said:
Where did Jesus ever say that Genesis is a literal historical accvount? I don't see where He ever said this.

We often refer to fictional characters as if they were literal historical. Someone out if context could think we mean them that way.

Christsfreeservant · 2025-12-11T17:13:34-0600

The Church isn’t (to be)

• A building built by humans with or without a steeple on top

• A place you go to once or twice a week and then you leave

• A business of human origin being marketed to the world

• Incorporated under (joined, included, united with) the state

• Merged, combined, partnered with the world and the ungodly

[Matthew 21:12-13; John 2:13-17; Acts 5:27-32; 1 Corinthians 1:10-13; 1 Corinthians 3:1-9; 2 Corinthians 6:14-18; Philippians 3:18-19; Revelation 2:1-29; Revelation 3:1-22; Revelation 13:5-8; Revelation 18:1-5]

The Church is (to be)

• The universal body of believers in Jesus Christ, by faith in Christ

• A gathering of people of like faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord

• For the purpose of mutual participation and encouragement

• For mutual edification, exhortation, and sharing of Spiritual gifts

• For the spiritual upbuilding of the body of Christ to spiritual maturity

[Acts 2:14-18,42-47; Romans 12:1-8; 1 Corinthians 12:1-31; 1 Corinthians 14:1-5; Galatians 6:1; Ephesians 2:8-10; Ephesians 4:1-16; Ephesians 5:15-21; Ephesians 6:10-20; Philippians 2:1-8; Colossians 3:12-16; Titus 2:11-14; Hebrews 3:13; Hebrews 10:23-25; James 5:19-20]

Therefore, when we gather together as the church, the body of believers in Jesus Christ, by God-gifted and God-persuaded faith in our Lord, it is for the purpose of our mutual encouragement and edification where each part is able to do its work, as we have been gifted by the Holy Spirit in spiritual gifts, and as we have been given our assignments by God as to our specific body parts (roles, ministries) within the body of believers in Jesus Christ.

So, this is not a “one man show,” where one man does all the preaching, and leads every gathering, and whose sermons are never tested to see if they are of God or not… And where the “pastor” is treated more like a CEO of a corporation, or more like a cult leader who is surrounded by a faithful few who are protecting him and his position, regardless of whether he is right or wrong, or if he is living the Christian life, or not, which is all about running a business. And it is not about a show, period, where a few gifted and talented people (in speaking and in music) put on a stage production intended to draw in large crowds of people from the world into their gatherings.

Yes, the early church had overseers, but they were overseers of the entire church (the body of believers in Christ) within a particular city, so they were not the singular pastors of all these gatherings, which usually met in people’s homes, which is where the people were able to share their gifts and mutual encouragements. And since the body of Christ was to meet daily, and to encourage one another daily, and they met in people’s homes, it may be that there wasn’t always an overseer at every one of their gatherings.

Now, the body of Christ cannot function as the biblical body of Christ in large gatherings where a few people put on the show while the rest of the people largely sit in pews or chairs as spectators, and then they go home and live their normal lives until the next week. The Bible, in fact, teaches that we are to be speaking the truth of God’s word to one another in love, and we are to be speaking to one another in spiritual songs, and we are to be admonishing and teaching one another, and exhorting one another EVERY DAY.

Do we need overseers? Yes! But the shepherds of the people are not to be the only ones doing the talking and the preaching and sharing of gifts. But they are to be those who are leading the sheep in how they are to live and operate together as the body of Christ, who are training and equipping the saints of God in the work of the ministry. For all of us are to be ministers, not just one person. And those who are overseers need to meet the spiritual qualifications of an overseer, and they need to be accountable to the church.

“Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love” (Ephesians 4:15-16). “But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose. If all were a single member, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts, yet one body” (1 Corinthians 12:18-20).

No Less

An Original Work / March 19, 2012
Christ’s Free Servant, Sue J Love

I can do no less than praise You,
Lord, for all You’ve done for me.
You died for my sins to save me,
So I would be set free.
I adore You! Lord, I praise You!
Jesus, Savior, King of kings!
You provided my redemption.
Your grace has pardoned me.

I can do no less than serve You.
Lord, Your witness I would be,
Telling others of Your love,
And why You died on that tree.
Tell of how You gave of Your life,
So from sin we’d be set free,
So we could worship You forever,
And live eternally.

I can do no less than love You,
Lord, for You have first loved me.
You gave of Your life so willing,
Because You cared for me.
Turn from my sin! Obey freely!
Live for You each passing day.
Read Your word, and follow Your lead,
Lord, as I humbly pray.

Login to view embedded media
Church is, Church isn’t
An Original Work / December 11, 2025
Christ’s Free Servant, Sue J Love

probinson · 2025-12-11T17:06:43-0600

BasedLutheran said:
Oops. The only ones politicizing it were the leftists.

Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots

Denial only serves the aims of anti-vaxxers.

www.theatlantic.com

I saw this story yesterday at The Atlantic. The headline is clearly meant to be attention-grabbing. But WOW, what an admission! If you had suggested that a child could have died from the COVID vaccine just a few years ago, you would have been accused of spreading misinformation and censored. That the mainstream media now readily admits that children died from the COVID vaccine is honesty quite astounding. If COVID taught us anything, it's that the only thing that separates conspiracy and "misinformation" from truth is often just time.

But the blasé way that the article approaches this very serious issue is kind of like (my paraphrase)...

Well of course some children died. Them's the breaks. You win some, you lose some. Ah well. Hoory for mRNA!

Absent from that article is any mea culpa or retrospection that, hmm, maybe mandating vaccines for children to attend school was ill-advised, given that children were at an infinitesimal risk from COVID. It's almost like we just have to accept that mandating interventions absent evidence means that, yeah, sure, we're going to lose a child here and there. But SCIENCE!

It would be laughable if it weren't so sad. But the thing that concerns me the most is the lack of concern and the blind trust that so many people still have in the industry and those funded by them. They still truly believe that this is about public health. They can easily spot when Joe Schmo is grifting and making a buck or two on false claims from vaccines, but they are completely, utterly, and I believe in many cases willfully blind to the IMMENSE financial incentives driving our public health "recommendations".

Pommer · 2025-12-11T17:02:55-0600

DaisyDay said:
ICE agents tackle, arrest American citizen in Minneapolis

Federal immigration agents tackled and arrested a Somali American man in Minneapolis on Tuesday and detained him for about two hours for no apparent reason other than his ethnicity.

www.mprnews.org

Federal immigration agents tackled and arrested a Somali American man in Minneapolis on Tuesday and detained him for about two hours for no apparent reason other than his ethnicity. The man who was arrested said that the agents had trouble finding the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building at Ft. Snelling while driving him there.

The 20-year-old was not suspected of any crime, and described his ordeal during a Wednesday news conference alongside Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Police Chief Brian O’Hara, who each denounced the agents’ actions.

Login to view embedded media

This is state sponsored terrorism.

I’ve heard this referred to as a “Kavanaugh Stop”. CF

Landon Caeli · 2025-12-11T16:52:08-0600

Wow, this thread has become incredibly boring all of a sudden.

NxNW · 2025-12-11T16:49:26-0600

HARK! said:
Yes behold. Right out of the gate, the disinformation from your uncited source

Uncited?

The citation is right at the bottom of the image!

HARK! said:
View attachment 374337

One year after the gold confiscation in 1933, the value of gold was set at $35 per ounce following the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. This was an increase from the previous value of $20.67 per ounce at the time of the confiscation.

As you can see, the chart is by decade.

HARK! said:
Ooops! The price is still climbing; and the demand is higher than what is being mined. Aside from it being categorized as a strategic metal, what is being used to create the growing solar panel market is unrecoverable.

Not sure how this is relevant, or that it refutes the chart.

Dan Perez · 2025-12-11T16:45:51-0600

stevevw said:
I think the body of Christ reigns today even more than ever because theres too many wolves. Now more than ever is the world open to turning a truth into a lie and a lie into the truth. The postmodern age where words, narratives and feelings make relaity and there is no way to tell the truth.

So we need a clear and truthful example in among all that white noise of Enlightened relativism that will be different and stand out as worthy and without fault. One that is above reproach.

As Christians we know this is Christ. But we have often failed to differentiate ourselves from the culture wars and the church has become just another identity among many even divided among itself. In a never ending war of words and alternative truth claims.

So that means the only way to stand out from all this is to actually be like Christ. To become part of the body of Christ. Which means actually living like Christ and not just speaking the words. This means actually doing what the bible says. Not half doing it but doing it all the way. Just as they did in the early church.

That means being willing to lay down your life literally. Put God above world desires and wants. Not having those material goods and doinging everything as Gods will and not our own.

When we see how even churches don't live to much different to the world then its no wonder people hate the church and God. Most people today do not do what they say. They are good at pointing out the wrongs of others or how people should live. But don't actually live that way themselves.

People are more respected when they live what they preach or teach. In fact for the early church and for Christ they were fairly silent when it came to their own opinion and getting into culture wars. They lived the gospel and example and the few words they did say were well respected. Because people seen that they lived what they preached and it was the truth.

This is all about embodying the gospel and Christ. This example speaks volumes and is power. People cannot argue against it because you are what you say.

But the important thing is that no human idea could ever be good enough that it would make a person untouchable and above reproach. Because we are weak.

So when people embody and like as Christ and actually putting others above themselves, loving their enermies and dying for them. Thet see God without one word being spoken. This is the power of Christs example. People do not even have to say where the truth and power of this testimony comes from. They immediate see it is from God as Christ is God and we are reflecting that to others.

I think the body of Christ is rising again because the world strayed so far away from God. When this happens God reminds people and Christs light shines in the darkness so that people can know Him when the chaos and darkness becomes too great in the world. Bold and pure Christians will restore Gods truth in among all the lies and wolves and Pharisees who are hypocrites.

And most here will never believe that the LAW has been set aside AS is written. in. ACTS 28:25-28 and in. ISA 6:1-13

and 2 Tim 2:15 will not believe >

and HEB 9:18. is the MOST POWERFUL verse that says why the LAW HAD TO BE SET ASIDE !!

dan p

Say it aint so · 2025-12-11T16:37:58-0600

essentialsaltes said:
Can Tish cheer yet?

2nd grand jury refuses to indict New York AG Letitia James: Sources
For a second time in recent days, a federal grand jury in Virginia has refused to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud, sources said.

The grand jury rejected the Department of Justice's attempt to refile the case after a federal judge dismissed an earlier case based on the unlawful appointment of the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia.

The charges were presented to a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia's Alexandria branch after a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia, last week rejected the charges.

"This unprecedented rejection makes even clearer that this case should never have seen the light of day," James' attorney, Abbe Lowell, said in a statement. "Career prosecutors who knew better refused to bring it, and now two different grand juries in two different cities have refused to allow these baseless charges to be brought. Any further attempt to revive these discredited charges would be a mockery of our system of justice."

As New York Judge Sol Wachtler said in 1985, “If a district attorney wanted, a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.”

That is how incompetent the Trump DOJ is.
In fact in one case, the ham sandwich won.

Yarddog · 2025-12-11T16:18:45-0600

Servus said:
No party has been as wackadoodles over a president as the democrats have been against Trump.

No President has been so wackadoodles as Trump. That was the consensus of all the living Presidents and VPs.

Even first term Trump thinks 2nd term Trump is wackadoodles. Lol

Shane R · 2025-12-11T16:14:05-0600

6 years.

New Posts

New Posts

2nd grand jury refuses to indict New York AG Letitia James: Sources​

Filter

Forum statistics

Share this page

2nd grand jury refuses to indict New York AG Letitia James: Sources