Intercessory Prayer
- By FaithT
- One Bread, One Body - Catholic
- 8 Replies
Yeah but sorry, that isn’t helpful for me.You know the old saying "God works in mysterious ways?"
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yeah but sorry, that isn’t helpful for me.You know the old saying "God works in mysterious ways?"
Free to overlap one another, as in an eclipse? And what about a lunar eclipse, when the earth is between the sun and the moon, cause the earth's shadow to hide the moon?
This is what makes your assertions and opinions, into a joke."22 So the house of Israel shall know that I am the LORD their God from that day and forward."
The Jews will know that Jesus is the LORD their God at the time of Jesus's return.
Good catch, I was reading from a script, but I still think the message was very effective. This was unusual for me because most of my videos are ad lib. Second, I see your point - it's actually an excellent painting in the background - but I haven't invested a lot in the visuals of my videos. Unfortunately I live in a rather barren apartment. There is no bookshelf currently and I'm unsure if I'd want to invest in one.Rule Number 1: Don't read from a script if you do a Youtube vid.
Rule Number 2: Get an interesting background. Bookshelf or something.
Tip Number 1: Nobody is going to be interested in talking to a random dude with no followers about anything.
Yes, who elae is going to do it but you? There is only so much that a your neighbors should be asked to do if you are a healthy able bodied adult. At what point do you take responsibility of yourself instead of asking your neighbors to take responsibility for you?The key is to grab the strap on your boot and use it to lift yourself from the floor...
Oh the drama
What is….. the Mamdani effect (in your own words)?It's being called the Mandami effect.
This all sounds personal and subjective. So what about the many people who align with Kirk. Are they also not Christians.
Not that I am saying either opinion is correct but that this idea that some are not Christians and others are can be taken many ways dependning on a persons tilt whatever that is.
I think this is identity politics. Just like Kirk is not a true Christian belonging to the true Christian identity. There are other Christian identities within Christianity that war just like in secular society.
Like X politician is not a true Dem or Repulican or instead is a Nazi or white supremisist or Woke or Trans or a Women or male or black or Queer. Everything is determined by the identity and its ever changing morals and criteria for whats fits the moral and immoral identity of each group. According to the ideology they subscribe to.
Thats why I think as with the early church. Don't get too involved in the political arena. Just say the truth of the gospel warts and all and let people take it or leave it. Walk away. Don't get too bogged down in the politics and arguements as in the end its bel;ief and the spirit. Not some logical or reasoned arguement. Though that can dispell misconceptions many have today.
If they are interested they will come looking. God will be the one who awakens them. But if they are hostile Christ said pack up your stuff and go to the next town who may be more open.
How in heaven's name is that going to work? Buy a house when you're 25 and you're still paying it off when you're 75? Who is going to take over the payments when you retire? Your kids'll probably be only half way through paying for theirs.
I think this is a wonderful idea. You get to save some money per month, and when you die halfway into paying back your mortgage, your legacy lives on.
Not as successful as having her in Congress! Nancy Pelosi made $130M in stock profits during her Congressional career, a mind blowing return of 16,930%...Insider trading, pure and simple! She has done way better than Warren Buffett! It is very obvious that she used her position in Congress to enrich herself. Before first taking Congressional office in 1987, the then-47-year-old freshman and her hubby, venture capitalist Paul Pelosi, reported between $610,000 and $785,000 in stocks in their portfolio, according to a copy of her 1987 financial disclosure.He was a successful investor before she ever ran for COngress.
The bible doesn't tell us how old Mary was, nor does it tell us that she rode a donkey to Bethlehem. It also doesn't tell us that Joseph was much older than Mary. We have songs that tell us these things, for example, "Little Donkey" and "The Cherry Tree Carol" which begins: "Joseph was an old man, an old man was he." But such songs are unbiblical.As practiced custom I would say Mary was young. Maybe around 16 years when she was pregnant. As it seems the whole thing happened pretty quick with Caesar Augustus and the census and having to return to Bethlehem to be enrolled. Mary got pregnant, she met Joseph and the next thing pregnant Mary is on a donkey to Bethlehem.
Joseph would have been a lot older, maybe 35. But really I think that can be young in those times. At least not some old bloke which can happen.
But what I find most interesting when I seen this topic. Its been on my mind for some reason. Maybe because we are more or less 2,000 years exactly to a lot of these events around Christ.
But depending on when you think Christ was born. Some say the year 0 or 1AD. But theres a consensus for around 4BC. If thats the case then we would be coming into the start of 2000 years since Christ began His 3 year ministry. That would mean in 2027 or maybe 2026 Christ will be starting.
John the Baptist will be calling from the wilderness just about now 2000 years ago lol. Christ would have been at home preparing. But its getting close to His 2000 year anniversary of His ministry and eventual crucifixtion. I wonder if this has any significance.
Well I suppose kids have their parents available should they get too distressed, but I agree that it makes no sense to single out the Bible.They should placing a warning on fairy tales then. That stuff was read before college and it intensifies as the student matures.. why single out the Bible? It really makes no sense when you look at the big picture.
My bad, I got you and Yard Dog mixed up. I got confused who I was talking with.Where did I say that? Link and quote from me, please.
Because it was lost. Thats whats called lost advanced knowledge.
The church does not teach both offers. The only one they tell people about is believe in Jesus to be saved.
There were requirements for both offers. One, to believe, required no work. The other required that you are not against Jesus, which required work. Anyone against Jesus would cause continual war on the new earth, and those who were not against Jesus could not live in peace. I thank God that He has requirements for both.
The pretext given is one thing, but the fact remains: Trump said do it, and Abbott obeyed. If you consider gerrymandering to indicate that a governor "lacks integrity or principles," then the criticism would be the same for Abbott as for Newsom. If you're willing to criticize one, but unwilling to criticize the other, then your issue isn't with integrity, principles or gerrymandering.I appreciate it, but I don't really see it as connected since it seems to just be a pretext to me.
A criticism that would apply to both governors, then. My point was that you're fully willing to criticize Newsome, but seem unwilling to levy the same criticism toward Abbott. Which would indicate to me your issue isn't entirely with the concept of gerrymandering.I never said I don't have a problem with other states doing it, but if the response to it is "well, let's do it!" then clearly the Democrats don't have a problem with it and only have a problem with it because Republicans are doing it. The judicial rulings on the issue appear to me to be entirely in the wrong, but my issue is with the governor of my state proving he's a partisan hack since he's more concerned with how his party performs than with protecting the voting rights of the citizens of his state.
He didn't do that either. He put it up to the voters, and they decided.I've since been corrected, he simply bypassed the commission in order to institute blatant gerrymandered districts.
As I said before, if there were legislation banning gerrymandering, I'd be fully behind it. But SCOTUS has ruled otherwise, so it remains perfectly legal and within the rights of any state to engineer it. Which means that, if one state doing so, purely for partisan reasons on orders from an authoritarian leader, is entirely legal, then another state doing so with the full consent and support of the voters is also perfectly legal.Either way, it shows a lack of integrity on his part and those who are defending the move while bemoaning Republican gerrymandering.
What does a dismissed civil case have to do with "turning evidence"? Civil cases don't have anything to do with criminal cases and Strzok hasn't worked for the FBI in 8 years.Federal Judge Drops Brutal Ruling Against Disgraced FBI Agent Who Played Key Role in Russia Hoax
A federal judge just gave disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok some horrible news. The judge dismissed his lawsuit against the government over his firing in 2018.Who will turn evidence to save themselves?