New Posts

JosephZ · 2025-11-19T20:19:09-0600

Fervent said:
Quote what I said.

Fervent said:
Though Protestant beligerantism is certainly problematic, but its a different sort of beligerance from that exemplified by islam. One will write scathing letters and call you a heretic, the other will cut your head off if you refuse to convert.

BCP1928 said:
Actually, the Quran does not allow the execution of those who won't convert. Some forms of Islam allow it for apostasy, but there is not universal agreement about it.

Fervent said:
Properly understood, it absolutely does. But that takes engagement with Islamic scholarship and the Sunnah material, where it is clear that Muhammad used the threat of conversion or death against the people of Mecca when he overthrew the city. And forms that deny death for apostasy are the exception, whereas it is the prescriptive punishment by pretty much all mainline divisions(sunni, shia, sufi)

boughtwithaprice · 2025-11-19T20:17:24-0600

Hentenza said:
lol You might want to reassess your opinion. By your measure it seems that your opinion is now subversive.

“A majority of Americans disapprove of Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations linked to the Trump administration’s mass deportation drive, according to a YouGov survey released on Friday. The poll found that 53 percent of citizens somewhat or strongly disapprove of ICE, while 39 percent approve of how the agency is operating.”

https://www.firstpost.com/world/majority-of-americans-disapprove-of-ice-raids-tied-to-trumps-mass-deportation-drive-poll-finds-13951163.html

The opinion that matters is at the ballot box, and Donald Trump was elected. You will have the opportunity to voice your opinion in 2026 and 2028. The election is the opinion that matters .
Skewed public opinion polls do not carry the weight of law Laugh all you want, your amusement numbs your mind to the truth

Oh and even the Pope says countries have the right to protect their borders. Biden did not

Pope Leo Rebukes Pro-Migration Advocates

Pope Leo Rebukes Pro-Migration Advocates

Pope Leo XIV politely rebuked the many pro-migration advocates who portray him and the Catholic Church as supporters of mass migration.

www.breitbart.com

BPPLEE · 2025-11-19T20:17:22-0600

NxNW said:
I don't think Bill Clinton has assaulted anyone.

Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and a dozen other women disagree

RickardoHolmes · 2025-11-19T20:14:54-0600

Well, I had to look it up and watch it and all I can say is that I liked it

I had to read your article. I remember back during the great "satanic Panic" how everything was supposedly "Satanic" Many people, especially clergy, made absolute fools of themselves with these accusations. Reading these comments, clearly their offspring is at work, carrying on the same mindless unimaginative "Oh this is Satanic" baloney that very few (fortunately) actually believe and for which none have any evidence at all.

Isaac the Recluse · 2025-11-19T20:13:38-0600

HantsUK said:
That's a simplification! Things vary between areas and from time to time the current Government decides that their predecessor got it all wrong and makes changes.

...

Definitely a simplification. There's a reason each country's education system has its own dedicated Wikipedia page, and I'm sure those remain an overview.

Fervent · 2025-11-19T20:11:29-0600

Hentenza said:
You can infer. I don’t.

Everybody does.

Hentenza said:
All of us believers compose the body of Christ regardless of denomination.

Yeah, but that doesn't negate the corporate element of the faith. We are not islands unto ourselves, and the whole "personal relationship" stuff is more Englightenment individualism run amok than truly Christian in character.

Hentenza said:
Please clarify. I’m not sure am understanding what you are asking.

If the section is "Christians-only" and they use the Nicene creed to identify who can post, what is it about the posters they are identifying with the Nicene creed?

CLEEB · 2025-11-19T20:04:54-0600

Delvianna said:
While I agree with you that there is 1 body of Christ and all who follow Jesus and his truth are within that, the problem is that there are teachings by other denominations that will not get people saved as they themselves aren't either. Just like Christ accused the Pharisees of leading people to damnation (Matthew 23:13, Matthew 23:15) there are groups of people doing the same. Which is why I don't subscribe to the idea that debating scripture is "dividing the body of Christ" when there are a lot of people who are false brothers based on their doctrine and technically then wouldn't be IN the body of Christ to begin with. So I think it's dangerous to consider every denomination as part of the body when for example, Mormons claim "Christianity" but clearly aren't in the body...

Delvianna, I agree. Many churches teach another Jesus and another gospel. The are about 45,000 different churches worldwide and are separated from each other over doctrine. I read in scripture that there is only one body or church, not 45,000. If you would try to find the “true church“ from among these 45,000 and would thoroughly study each one for only one day it would take you 125 years to cover them all. You would be dead and never find the true church unless you were able to cover them all. I read in scripture that of our own selves we cannot choose GOD or Jesus, they must choose us. We can’t by our own choice join GODS church, GOD must put us in. Are not Christians called and chosen ? Aren’t Christians called the elect of GOD ? They way Christians are called and chosen is somewhat similar to Paul's experience on the road to Damascus. This is how I was converted, it came as a big surprise and something I didn’t plan because I was involved in one of these 45,000 churches at the time. The call was to come out of them and be you separate, touch not the unclean thing and I will receive you. I obeyed this call and then I was chosen. This was all GOD and Christs doing not mine.

Zceptre · 2025-11-19T19:54:37-0600

CoreyD said:
Why are you judging me, and are you not attacking the poster rather than addressing the post?

I think you are confused. I did no such thing. Also, I did address the post, twice.

Best regards.

Michie · 2025-11-19T19:53:33-0600

lismore said:
Not only did the beasts in the proscribed terrorist group Hamas attack women, they sexually assaulted men too:

Ex-hostage Guy Gilboa-Dalal reveals he was sexually abused | The Jerusalem Post

"He let me shower, and when I finished, he dragged me out of there and didn't let me put on my clothes," said former hostage Guy Gilboa Dalal in recent testimony about the abuse he suffered in Gaza.

www.jpost.com

Hamas are proscribed for a reason, they're animals.

Animals are better than that.

Brother Del · 2025-11-19T19:44:28-0600

keras said:
Isaiah 51:1-2, Galatians 3:26-29, refute you.
It is a fundamental truth that Christian believers are the Spiritual descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Ethnic descent has no value.

I wouldn't say no value. Many Christian believers are indeed descended from Abraham. The presence and influence of the ten northern tribes has been well documented all throughout Europe and beyond. They were never lost in the physical. They were carried away captive and dispersed among the heathen, just as scripture said would happen. The promise that all the world would be blessed by Abraham's offspring has clearly been fulfilled, but not only by Christ, but also through the dispersed among the heathen. And just so no one can accuse me of white nationalism, the 10 northern tribes were an incredibly ethnically diverse group who's bloodlines were even more diluted as they mingled amongst the heathen. But it certainly cannot be said to be without value.

Many were present at the day of Pentecost.

"And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven"
Acts 2:5

James addressed them directly in His epistle.

"James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting."
James 1:1

Paul's missionary journeys were all about seeking them out and turning them to Christ.
Paul declared himself the Apostle to the gentiles, gentiles simply means nations or peoples, it has never meant everyone or anyone who is not a Jew, though that is what many with a particular agenda would have us to believe.

CLEEB · 2025-11-19T19:42:45-0600

CoreyD said:
Did God create his intelligent children with free will?
Though many whether religious or non religious claim not, and argue against this, the answer is clearly yes.

What is the proof?
There are a number of scriptures, but let's start with John 8:44

Starting with God's heavenly children - the spirit creation, called angels, the Bible says of the one called Devil and Satan... When he lies, he speaks out of his own character. That is... pertaining to self, or of his own.
The disciple James uses this term in this way...

James 1:14

Jesus thus makes clear that the angel that became Satan the Devil, acts according to his own will, or desire.
Jesus further states in the same verse, John 8:44... "your will is to do your father’s desires".
Humans too, have their own will, which is in opposition to the father.

Can sin be blamed for the will of intelligent creatures?
Jesus said, the one called Devil and Satan, "was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him".
So, no, this was a deliberate opposing of the truth. Hence, the name Satan.

It's also important to note that this angel .... in fact all of the angels... none are born in sin and shaped in iniquity.
So, sin cannot be claimed as a hinderance to free will. Nor can it be claimed that they have to give in to wrong desires.
The angels make their own decisions to do what the want. Genesis 6:2
Proof that the angels - God's heavenly children, do have free will.

Regarding humans, the same apply.
In saying that their will is to do Satan's desire, what was Jesus pointing out? They were acting on their own will. Not anyone else's.
That humans have free will is made clear in other scriptures.

1 Timothy 2:14

The Bible says Adam was not deceived.
Thus Adam acted on his own free will.
The verse says, Eve became a sinner, only after acting on her desire.
Adam and Eve were free willed agents... not driven by sin, but making free willed decisions.
Proof that humans... God's earthly children were created with free will.

Did sin somehow cancel out free will.
In the imagination of many, that is the case.
However, the Bible does not say that after sin came into the world through one man, that free will became obsolete.
Rather, the scriptures refer to man's free will, repeatedly.
Leviticus 1:3; 1 Corinthians 9:16-18 Deuteronomy 30:19; 2 Corinthians 9:7; Philemon 1:14

The Greek word hekousios - meaning free will, is the neuter of a derivative from hekon; voluntariness -- willingly, which is (an adjective, a primitive term) – properly, willing; "unforced, of one's own will, voluntary" (J. Thayer), i.e. acting on one's own accord. The root (hek-) emphasizes intentional, deliberate action (choice), i.e. "of free-will" (J. Thayer).

You are correct. GOD created Adam and Eve with free will. If HE did not then GOD would be responsible for sin in humanity . Imagine a GOD that condemns humanity for sin that they had no choice in acquiring. To truly love GOD and neighbor must be by free will otherwise it isn’t true love. The will of the unconverted is their own choice but the will of the converted is to yield their will to GOD just as Christ did. Jesus had his own will but it was always in agreement with GODS will. This is our example to follow and GODS spirit is our guide and teacher to will and to do HIS good pleasure. We then are GODS workmanship, GODS work is performed in us as in Christ. Jesus said that his FATHER did the works, provided him with the words he spoke and that his doctrine was not his own but of the ONE who sent him. We are to be transformed into the image of Jesus who is to live in us , our hope of glory. Everything is to the glory of the ALMIGHTY GOD.

NxNW · 2025-11-19T19:35:04-0600

eleos1954 said:
Yes ... our elections should be a high priority and everything possible should be put in place to ward off "interference" and so far that has not been done. Ending mail in voting and requiring proper ID would help.

Neither would help.

SabbathBlessings · 2025-11-19T19:34:21-0600

WordSword said:
We are "walking as He walked" (1Jo 2:6), when we are about the Father's business (Luk 2:49).

According to the Scriptures, we walk as He walked when we follow in His example that He set forth for us 1John2:6 1 Peter 2:21-22 So how did Jesus live what did He teach this is the faith we are to have, not just faith in Jesus, but the faith of Jesus Rev14:12

A Devil's Advocate · 2025-11-19T19:33:18-0600

Disclaimer: This post is intended for those who follow the True God of the bible and not the lesser form of God commonly associated with Christianity (sarcasm intended).

There is this popular belief that mankind messed up. We were given a test. Should we choose correctly, we would remain in a relationship with God, completely dependent on Him. But if we choose wrong, we would end up cast out from a relationship with Him and left to eventually die, unless God were to intervene. This test was made known through the two trees in the midst of the Garden; the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Of course, as we've all been made to understand, mankind messed up and made the wrong choice. This is absolutely ridiculous!

Let's start with the fact that God is the creator of the very reality in which we exist. All existence comes from God. The very idea that God would create a life form, from the infinite possibilities of what He could create, that would be capable of messing up, if He did not want them to mess up, is absolute fantasy. If God did not want man to sin, man never would've sinned. When the serpent told Eve she would become like God, the serpent was speaking in reference to knowledge, not some form of godly power capable of messing up God's plan.

Also, the idea that God was testing man to see if he would remain loyal is just as ridiculous. In everything that God created, He said that it 'was all very good.' There was nothing God created that could possibly tempt man away from God. By introducing the tree of knowledge, with the commandment not to eat from it, creates the very condition where disloyalty becomes possible. Meaning, God creates the very thing to cause disloyalty. This is illogical. If He did not want man to be tempted, He would not have created the potential for it.

So why the tree of knowledge then?

A relationship requires the freedom to either accept or to refuse. For such a choice to be realized requires what we understand as freewill. Freewill, at it's very essence, is the freedom to deny God, to deny our very creator. It is what enables our moral agency, the capacity to discern between good and evil, right and wrong, and to act accordingly. So naturally, in order to have freewill, one must posses the knowledge of good and evil. This is knowledge that neither Adam or Eve had prior to the fall, Gen 3:5, Gen 3:22.

For God to establish the possibility of a relationship means allowing man freewill. To allow man freewill means allowing man the knowledge of good and evil. However, this comes at a cost. God is Just by nature and cannot act contrary to His nature. This means any evil that is committed must be punished. The punishment for evil is spiritual death, separation from God. This, of course, creates a dilemma. How does God allow man freewill while upholding His Divine justice?

Christ Jesus!

God resolves this dilemma through Jesus. God takes upon Himself the punishment for sin in the person of Jesus. Through His sacrifice, mankind is forgiven making it possible to enter into a relationship with God.

It should also be understood that you cannot know the character/nature of God without evil. God Is good, but how are you to know good if you don't know it's opposite? You need it's opposite from which to distinguish what is good. How were Adam and Eve to know God wasn't evil, or that the serpent wasn't good? Surely, had Eve known the serpent wasn't good, she wouldn't have listened to him. Adan and Eve had no way of recognizing the goodness of God until they experienced the absence of God, until they experienced evil.

Sin was no accident. It was necessary so that the goodness of God could be known. Likewise, the crucifixion was also a part of God's divine plan. It was necessary in order to deal with the penalty for the sin that God had to allow. It was all predestined, as capture beautifully by Paul in Eph 1:4-10.

Now, don't misunderstand... God does not will sin! Nor does He take pleasure in it. But in His infinite wisdom, He knew that allowing sin would create the context in which humanity could experience His goodness, grace, and love. The fall wasn't a breakdown in God's plan, it was the very road in which that plan would be fulfilled.

concretecamper · 2025-11-19T19:32:27-0600

2 Tim 3:15 And because from thy infancy thou hast known the holy scriptures which can instruct thee to salvation by the faith which is in Christ Jesus.
3:16 All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice:

The Scriptures Timothy knew from his infancy ( most likely before Christ was crucified ) is the Tanakh. Paul COULD NOT be referring to the Bible. Paul was referring to the Tanakh.

CLEEB · 2025-11-19T19:31:34-0600

BelieveItOarKnot said:
My how the errors in choices creep in.

Adam received “the command” from God, the quite entirely infamous “do not eat OR ELSE” command that we apparently all fell under.

Eve was not yet separated and formed from Adam. But Eve apparently had heard the command. How so?

Gen. 3:
2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

So we have 3 basic possibilities where this repeating of the command from God came from. We have no record of God repeating it to Eve. She may have had an inert or inner understanding of the command, being “within” Adam at the time, (God called them BOTH Adam on the day they were created-Gen. 5) OR the most likely source, Adam himself.

In any case Eve clearly got the command wrong, adding to it the statement that they may not “touch it.” God never said that. In fact they were meant to tend to the Garden and presumably every tree therein, inclusive of the infamous tree of knowledge of good/evil. An error was already in place and an unknown violation of God's Intentions for them, again most likely from the recount of Adam of that command, which would essentially prove his own fault in listening or retelling or tending the Garden. Or Eve made up the error herself, again showing error was in her own mind. In any case the command was mangled in her own mind and statements in stating the command to the serpent. She basically erred to the serpent and of course the serpent struck from there, getting her to consider making a “MORAL CHOICE.” Perhaps not even cognizant of the fact that she already erred.

So Eve starts her decision making with a built in fault. An error in recounting the exact command, to not “touch” the tree.

And here is where her decision making starts, all quite in line with making a good moral decision for herself:

Gen. 3:
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

A classic setup for making a moral choice.

Good/Pleasant/Wise. What could possibly go wrong?

What’s wrong with the picture is that we fail to see that lawlessness was already at work within both Adam, who never even bothered to correct Eve’s misstatement of the command, and Eve, showing that LUST, LUST and PRIDE was already within her, referring to this pattern stated by John in:

1 John 2:16
For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

Basically the things of the Father were NOT in Eve, but things of the world: good for food, pleasant to the eyes, the pride of being wise. All seemingly legitimate on the surface using the world’s decision making moral choice methods.

I honestly would hardly find fault in the decision making process, that we all employ daily. In many ways this decision making course is required to even survive. We have to eat. We like to eat things that please our eyes and we certainly are not rewarded for making foolish decisions.

But you see none of these observations are even accurate. What is accurate is that the package of Adam and Eve came PREPACKAGED with FAULTS.

Paul outlined this clearly in 1 Cor. 15:42-46 showing us exactly the conditions that
Adam and “all” natural people are planted in. These 3 things also correlate to Eve’s built in flaws:

Planted in corruption
Planted in dishonor
Planted in weakness

Is there supposed to be some surprise if outcome of making decisions with those pre-existing conditions is not and can never be moral? We make every decision from those planted conditions. Basically being seeded in dung, within the darkness of earth, our own dust body.

And lets not ignore what really happened to both Adam and Eve. Where the Word is sown, Satan comes immediately in our hearts to STEAL, to SIN in our own hearts via THEFT.

Obviously both Adam and Eve were stolen from within.

I believe the tempter was already at work within them both from the moment they first heard the Words of God. Yet hardly a one of us can see it, because we too have been stolen from.

And in this state we can’t even be honest with ourselves about it.

Instead we’ll claim that we justify ourselves by making good moral decisions, even with the hard line fact of EVIL CHOICES WITHIN TO CHOOSE FROM.

Remember these Words from Jesus: EVIL COMES FROM WITHIN.

It’s not optional, so let’s not try to pull Jesus’ Leg about it claiming we’re legally obedient and making good moral cnoices. Evil thoughts defile us all, period.

Mark 7:21-23

You have to love an HONEST BOOK. And of course not everything is as it appears on the surface, or in the mirror

How could Adam or Eve have any concept of what good and evil is prior to eating the fruit that would give them that knowledge ? The only thing Adam knew was that GOD told him not to eat from the forbidden tree and I would think he passed the information on to Eve. Before eating the forbidden fruit neither one knew what good and evil was. They didn’t even know they were naked until afterwards. Even though Eve ate the fruit first the eyes of both were only opened after Adam ate. When GOD first created Adam and Eve they were innocent they could not have fallen from grace because they were never under grace, there was no need for grace as there was no sin. Sin only entered the world after they sinned by eating the forbidden fruit. Adam didn’t fall from grace he failed to chose the other tree , that of life instead, which would have given him GODS spirit as well as the knowledge of the truth without having ever sinned. The man had to have a free will choice to obey GOD or not. This is one reason why the two trees were in the garden and Satan allowed to have access to Adam and Eve. GOD , being omniscient, knew Adam would sin and that is why Jesus was the lamb slain from the foundation of the world. The problem with humanity now is a defiled human spirit and when unconverted children of the devil. Christ was sent to remedy this situation by providing an ultimate sacrifice for sin to be proportioned out in three different times; now, the millennium and the second resurrection. The three measures of meal until the whole is leavened. This is why Jesus is called the second Adam who always did the will of his FATHER. Adam harkened to the voice of his wife instead of his GOD thus indicating he loved his wife more than his GOD. In the story of the events of the garden of Eden is the message of the gospel.

Servus · 2025-11-19T19:21:27-0600

rambot said:
I tend to think of rapists who brag about assaulting women and make fun of handicapped people as ethically compromised. Especially if they also try to catch glimpses of teenagers changing backstage at beauty pagents before jetting off to hang out with his really GREAT friend who traffics teenagers. A preponderance of suggestive evidence when there are also direct accusations, is not something you can just "dismiss out of hand cause you don't like it".

And if a Democrat did those things, you would (rightfully) also say they were awful people.

That's memorized misleading dialog that gets repeated verbatim. As if people have let themselves be programmed.

RocksInMyHead · 2025-11-19T19:15:55-0600

Valletta said:
Have you considered smaller insurers?

Smaller insurers have a smaller risk pool by nature. Therefore, they must either be very choosy about who they accept (which is problematic for people with, say, pre-existing conditions) or charge a lot of money for their premiums because they lack the leverage to negotiate with providers and don't have a large pool of insured individuals to spread costs among. While they might be a good option for some people, they can't (and won't) insure everyone.

Valletta said:
Free competition is the key,

The problem is that health insurance (and healthcare in general) doesn't operate on free market principles. You can't shop around for the best price or highest-rated hospital when you're having a heart attack or you suddenly go into labor or you run over your foot with a lawnmower. On the insurance side of things, as I said, smaller companies have to cut coverage or limit access in order to compete on price with the giant conglomerates. While that may look like a "free market" at a glance, offering lesser coverage (e.g. a catastrophic coverage policy rather than full coverage) or blocking the guy who has a family history of colon cancer is not something that we should be aspiring to.

Realistically, if you have the principle that everyone should receive medical care if and when they need it, the only thing that makes sense is a single-payer, government-run system.

Valletta said:
Blacks Lives Matter, for example, can offer their members health care and share the cost between members. They can cap the salary of a CEO at $100,000 and put it in their bylaws that every employee must make at least half of the salary of the CEO in order to keep costs affordable for patients. Anyone can incorporate and offer those same salaries and go into health insurance only, with a goal of making health insurance affordable for everyone.

What's the incentive for that? The government has a good reason to want a healthy population, but a private corporation? Please. Moreover, it's far from simple to run such a company.

Valletta said:
A person should be able to CHOOSE insurance from companies other than the ones Obama and Pelosi decided to favor.

The ACA does not restrict what companies are permitted to participate in the marketplace. They must offer plans that meet certain standards (e.g. no rejecting people based on pre-existing conditions, no lifetime benefit caps, etc), but there's nothing that says that Joe & Mary's Family Insurance Co. can't list their plans on the marketplace. The main reason why you only see plans from the "big, fat, rich insurance companies" on the marketplace is because they have a huge risk pool, and thus can offer better rates for plans that meet the ACA standard. And people buying their plans on the marketplace are going to look at two seemingly identical plans and pick the one that costs $500 less per month.

essentialsaltes · 2025-11-19T18:58:32-0600

Some tidbits from the outvoted 5th Circuit judge

When a judge warns readers to “Fasten your seatbelts!” before a 104-page legal diatribe — best to buckle up.

[Judge Jerry] Smith, on the losing end of that 2-1 ruling, attacked the plaintiffs as tools of left-wing donors George and Alex Soros, who featured at least 17 times in the ruling.

While dissenting judges typically refer obliquely to the “majority” opinion, Smith’s relentlessly personal and withering opinion [used opinion author Judge] Brown’s name more than 360 times, often accompanied by colorful insults.

Smith lit into Brown as an “unskilled magician” who “prefers living in fantasyland.” Smith said Brown committed “pernicious judicial misbehavior” by racing to issue his opinion. Brown emphasized [this] was intended to allow Texas leaders to return to the state’s earlier congressional boundaries before a Dec. 8 deadline for candidates to declare their bids for Congress.

“Whether Judge Brown likes it, gravity exists,” Smith wrote.

Although judges typically couch their deliberations in a veil of secrecy, Smith revealed them in great detail, even quoting from the text of email exchanges with Brown as the ruling was being prepared.

ThatRobGuy · 2025-11-19T18:54:16-0600

I'm not all that concerned about "the Islam" factor of Mamdani.

If he was actually devout, then that may be some cause for concern, but given his political stances (both social and economic) he's clearly not a devout adherent to Islam.

In that debate between him, Cuomo, and that "Guardian Angel" wanna-be, he openly admitted to patronizing legal pot dispensaries, and his position on LGBTQ issues are pretty well-known, so clearly he's not that "strict".

Leaf473 · 2025-11-19T18:54:05-0600

Two people celebrating the Sabbath together in the Holy land. Then one travels west, the other travels east.

The one traveling west will celebrate about an hour later for each thousand miles they travel. The one traveling east, about an hour earlier.

When they meet up on the opposite side of the earth, they will be celebrating the Sabbath a day apart.

I love you all!

Lost4words · 2025-11-19T18:52:22-0600

keras said:
No. we will know soon enough.

As set out in Revelation 6:12-17, then many events, leading up to the glorious Return. in Rev 19:11.

A knee jerk reply totally lacking in scriptural or scientific support.

God does that, He commands the sun to send out a consuming fire to judge the peoples. Psalms 50:1-6

Your unintelligible comments and failure to prove what I point out from the Prophets- wrong, is your bad.

What you write is your very own bad interpretation of scripture. You read into it your own ideas Keras. And then, you dislike it when that is pointed out.

Valletta · 2025-11-19T18:49:41-0600

US Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick of Florida indicted on charges of stealing $5M in disaster funds

U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick of Florida has been indicted on charges accusing her of stealing $5 million in federal disaster funds and using some of the money to aid her 2021 campaign, the Justice Department said Wednesday. The Democrat is accused of stealing Federal Emergency...

www.yahoo.com

All that power and wealth that comes with being a member of Congress seems like it was not enough.

rebornfree · 2025-11-19T18:49:05-0600

We're praying in Church, for it not to become law, and I've written to my MP twice, urging him to vote against it. I know others have written too. There are some of us in England and Wales who see the dangers of it going ahead, including many medical personnel and disability groups.

essentialsaltes · 2025-11-19T18:47:00-0600

Nancy Mace moves to force vote on censuring Cory Mills

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced a resolution to censure fellow Republican Rep. Cory Mills (Fla.) and remove him from committees Wednesday, listing allegations of harassment, assault, stolen valor and improper contracts by his arms sales company.

Mills has been at the center of numerous personal controversies this year. [stuff in posts #1 and #3]

Mace’s censure resolution references reporting in The Daytona Beach News-Journal questioning how and why he was awarded a Bronze Star, with two service members “disputing that Mills was involved in their rescue or provided live-saving care.”

And finally, Mace’s resolution notes Mills is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee after the Office of Congressional Conduct found that his companies “may have entered into, held, or enjoyed contracts with federal agencies while he was a Member of Congress in violation of House rules, standards of conduct, and federal law.”

New Posts

New Posts

Nancy Mace moves to force vote on censuring Cory Mills​

Filter

Forum statistics

Share this page

Nancy Mace moves to force vote on censuring Cory Mills