• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is Hell Annihilationism or Eternal Torment

Actually that would be the minority view not the majority. The majority of Christians view hell as infinite torment. A forever existing of maximum suffering in fire where the fire is some sort of supernatural "not like real fire in this life" process.




Matt 25:41 NASB 41 “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels;

Jude 1:7 just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.

2 Pet 2:6 6 and if He condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to destruction by reducing them to ashes, having made them an example to those who would live ungodly lives thereafter


No matter what someone wishes to believe. The Bible is true. In all its statements on the subject

1. God is a "consuming fire" in Heb 12 rather than a fire "that does not consume'
2. John does not use the term hell for burning but rather the lake of fire. the apostle John never uses the term hell to mean place of torment or fire. Rather he uses the term "lake of fire" that "devours them" vs 9 " fire came down from heaven and devoured them." NASB
3. Luke 12 says each person is punished according to deeds, some receive much punishment and some less. Very different from "infinite punishment for all"
4. Ezek 28 says that Satan "will be turned to ashes on the Earth, You will cease to be forever"


18 “By the multitude of your iniquities,
In the unrighteousness of your trade
You profaned your sanctuaries.
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 “All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”

5. Matt 10:28 says God totally destroys both soul and body in hell as compared to the first death where men can "kill the body but not the soul"

6. Not one text says the wicked have eternal life. In Ezek 18 the wicked die and the righteous do not die.

7. In Rev 20 the wicked are "consumed" by fire that comes from God

8. Malachi 4:3 You will tread down the wicked, for they will be ashes under the soles of your feet on the day which I am preparing,” says the Lord of hosts.
The bible never ever describes death as "cessation of existence", if your view was correct, then mankind doesn't actually exist and this life is an illusion.

But we know that we do exist, so your view is based on false doctrine.

According to God everyone s already dead, so what is death. If we are born dead in sin, then death is not the (cessation of existence) death you believe in. To the contrary, the bible confirms that sinners are born (spiritually dead) and then they die a second (spiritual death) which is their eternal state. They remain in their spiritually dead state for all eternity, but they are fully conscious and they feel pain just as much as thy do now.

So, we need to find out what the Biblical description of death is, before we can draw to any conclusion on the matter. From what I see, your view is not supported by any scripture. Satan is a Spiritual being, He is not made of flesh and bone so the description of His burning up to ashes on the earth must be referring to His power as the Prince of this world. He is stripped of all His power and He will never be reinstated as the Prince of this world.

The Bible is clear that on that day (when we step into eternity), everyone will be resurrected and reunited their own bodies. Those who died in their sin will remain in that state forever, but those who were saved will receive a glorified body and we will be perfect and sinless like Christ Himself.
Upvote 0

The Reality of Free Will

I am talking about the op. The op claims Adam acted on his own free will, which is a noun. All of the terms you use to prove this act of free will are adjectives, not nouns in scripture. You need to prove that a voluntary choice (The noun, see below) exists in the moral/immoral context. To be clear, scripture teaches there are two masters, righteousness and unrighteousness, and we must serve either one or the other. You need to disprove that. When scripture speaks of a neutral position between the two masters, it's called doublemindedness not free will. This is why I'm saying the only true free will is the one set free from sin just like Jesus and Paul taught.

freewill​

1 of 2

adjective

free·will ˈfrē-ˌwil

Synonyms of freewill
: voluntary, spontaneous
free will
2 of 2

noun

1
: voluntary choice or decision
I do this of my own free will.


2
: freedom of humans to make choices that are not determined by prior causes or by divine intervention

So watch this: When you say God created his children with free will the noun, notice how if we fill in the blank with the adjectives you provide as proof of free will, it doesn't make any sense.

God created his children with voluntary
God created his children with willing
God created his children with uncoerced
God created his children with unforced
God created his children with willful
God created his children with intended
God created his children with deliberate
God created his children with intentional
God created his children with free-willed

Notice the term will as a noun (meanings 2-6 below, not meaning 1). See how the noun makes sense and is coherent. -->
God created his children with a will.

Will
2 of 3

noun

ˈwil
1
: a legal declaration of a person's wishes regarding the disposal of their property or estate after death
especially : a written instrument legally executed by which a person makes disposition of their estate to take effect after death

2
: desire, wish: such as
a
: disposition, inclination
where there's a will there's a way

b
: appetite, passion
c
: choice, determination

3
: the act, process, or experience of willing : volition

4
a
: mental powers manifested as wishing, choosing, desiring, or intending
b
: a disposition to act according to principles or ends
c
: the collective desire of a group
the will of the people


5
: the power of control over one's own actions or emotions
a man of iron will


6
a
: something desired
especially : a choice or determination of one having authority or power
b(1)
[from the phrase our will is which introduces it] : the part of a summons expressing a royal command
(2)
archaic : request, command


You need to prove that free will the noun exists in the moral immoral context. These terms you've listed above are neutral terms in the moral/immoral context. Therefore, in the moral/immoral context, you still have not proven Adam was not persuaded by the woman who was deceived, and you still haven't proven people can be good apart from God's Spirit. You need to prove these fruits listed below come according to the volition of mankind not by God's Spirit:

The Fruits of the Spirit​

  1. Love: A selfless, unconditional affection towards others, reflecting God's love for humanity.
  2. Joy: A deep-seated sense of happiness and contentment that is not dependent on external circumstances.
  3. Peace: A tranquility and assurance that comes from trusting in God, providing a sense of calm amidst chaos.
  4. Patience: The ability to endure difficult situations and the imperfections of others without frustration.
  5. Kindness: A disposition to be helpful, generous, and considerate towards others.
  6. Goodness: Moral integrity and a commitment to doing what is right, even when it is difficult.
  7. Faithfulness: Loyalty and reliability in relationships, reflecting trust in God and His promises.
  8. Gentleness: A humble and considerate approach to others, characterized by meekness and compassion.
  9. Self-Control: The ability to regulate one's emotions, thoughts, and behaviors, demonstrating discipline and restraint.
    These fruits are seen as evidence of a believer's relationship with the Holy Spirit and are essential for living a Christ-centered life. They reflect the character of God and guide believers in their interactions with others and their spiritual growth.

You’ve shown that Scripture uses adjectives like hekón and hekousios to describe voluntary actions. But voluntariness is not the same as free will the noun. Scripture never says Adam had ‘free will’ as a faculty of autonomous moral choice. Instead, it says Adam was persuaded by Eve (Genesis 3:17), Satan’s will is bound to lies (John 8:44), and all who sin are slaves to sin (John 8:34). Paul says creation is subjected to vanity ‘not willingly’ (Romans 8:20). So yes, people act voluntarily, but that does not prove they possess free will in the moral/immoral sense. The only true free will Scripture acknowledges is the will set free from sin by Christ (Romans 6:18; John 8:36).”
We have nothing else to talk about.
Upvote 0

Africa’s Catholic Awakening Amid Persecution

By 2025, it is projected that Africa will be home to one-sixth of the world’s Catholics. That means tens of millions of faithful believers—many of them first- or second-generation Catholics—bringing new life to a Church that has long been centered in Europe and the Americas. This demographic shift represents one of the most profound transformations in Church history.

First Week of Advent

December 2, 2025

Our Morning Offering – 2 December – O Virgin Most Pure, Wholly Unspotted


One Minute Reflection – 2 December – ‘ … And, the greater their purity, the more they will see!’

Saint Bibiana propers & commentary (EF)

Feria (First Sunday of Advent) propers & commentary (EF)

Tuesday of the First Week of Advent (Gueranger)(EF)

Tuesday of the First Week of Advent readings & commentary (OF)

Tuesday of the First Week of Advent readings & commentary (OF)
Other Commemorations: St. Bibiana, Virgin and Martyr; St. Silverius, Pope and Martyr

Daily Gospel

ADVENTCAzT 2025 – 03 – Tuesday 1st Week of Advent

Saint Bibiana Virgin and Martyr

St. Bibiana

Saints of the Day

Audio version of Gueranger
Login to view embedded media
Morning and Night Prayers During Advent — From Dom Guéranger’s Liturgical Year
Login to view embedded media
Upvote 0

HERESY from Pope Leo!

He's been to Australia a few times and doesn't like our staple yeast extract "Vegemite". But he likes "Tim Tams".

From an AI source -

Yes, Pope Leo XIV reportedly dislikes Vegemite. He is quoted as preferring Tim Tams over Vegemite after having tried the Australian spread during his multiple visits to the country.

Dislike for Vegemite: Pope Leo XIV (formerly Cardinal Robert Prevost) has stated that he dislikes Vegemite after trying it on several visits to Australia.

Preference for Tim Tams: He is known to enjoy Tim Tams, a popular Australian chocolate biscuit, even jokingly hoping a gift of them was not Vegemite.

Reason: The dislike is a result of his personal taste, developed after trying Vegemite during his previous trips to Australia.

To borrow from Tommy Cooper, if Pope Leo ever comes to Australia in his official roel we'll present him with a year's supply of Vegemite - one jar!

And one day's worth of Tim Tam's.

1764676216868.png


Some years ago there was an TV ad in Australia where this female genie appears and reluctantly asks this knock about bloke what he wants to be, while she gets on with the more important business of buffing her nails.

He says something like "Rich, delicious and really, really cool!

She snaps her fingers and turns him into a packet of Tim Tams in the fridge!
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

They say for every boat stopped full of drugs headed to the US saves around 20,000 Americans from drug addiction and overdoses. There have been around a million drug death overdoses in the last 25 years. Which is more deaths than in all the major wars of the 20th century.

Musk has a good take on this and I tend to agree.

Most People Don't Realize What Trump's Venezuela Move Really Means - Until Now! | Elon Musk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksuP9MO6oLs
Upvote 0

Dream of an attack

When dreams are from The Lord, there is a purpose. We can always pray and asks Him about them.
My dreams have a tendency of happening some time later. I have made "before" and "after" threads here. The post of the dream before the event and another post after a very similar or the same event have occurred.

This dream have sent the whole nation of USA into a panic as they've encountered a potential enemy where their weapons are useless against it and an enemy using abilities or weapons they have no defense against and are masters of stealth and sneak attacks. They came out of nowhere like how such a large group of massive, 10 ft bipeds end up in the middle of LA without catching attention.
Upvote 0

Struggling with scrupulosity

st_worm2, thank you for your encouragement. I fell into a period of sin about 20 years ago that I had a hard time breaking free from. I would ask forgiveness and promise I would not do it again but found I would fail again. Trying to gut it out and rationalizing my sin. I became addicted to pain medicine during a period of about 12 years during which I had 10 major surgeries, some of them just a few months apart. I began to use them as a means to quiet the noise in my head and to feel some modicum of happiness. I never stopped praying, but as I look back on that was I actually rejecting Christ? It really worries me. I look at that time as “presenting my flesh as instruments of unrighteousness“. I fear that I may have hardened my heart beyond repentance, leading to apostasy and that is why this scrupulosity flare hit me out of the blue. God had removed His Spirit from me and I was lost. During this year I have weep many tears and asked God’s forgiveness repeatedly, but I just don’t hear from God or feel Him as much. My denominational upbringing placed a lot of emphasis on emotion. If you didn’t cry when you asked forgiveness you weren’t sincere. If you sinned you had to ”pray through again” with complete brokenness. Sorry, I know that was long and probably TMI, but it is out there. I know I have some warped views of Heavenly Father. I have to place my faith in His grace and forgiveness, not on my performance.
Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

This idea that the Sabbath is not supported in the NT, is not accurate. The Sabbath is quoted 55 times in the New Testament. Was kept after Jesus died, His covenant ratified on His death and the Sabbath was still kept after according to the commandment by His faithful followers that followed Him everywhere that Jesus never told changed

Luke23:56. Then they returned and prepared spices and fragrant oils. And they rested on the Sabbath according to the commandment.

Because God keeps His promises Psa89:34 Mat5:18-19. They were the first to see Him after His death and He never told them once to stop keeping the Sabbath or told anyone not to, He would have had to tell them before because His covenant was ratified at His death and His death was once and for all Heb10:10 why Jesus again in His own words predicted His people of all nations to "hold fast His covenant" Isa56:6-7. Its a made up idea that is not in our Bibles, but was predicted Dan7:25 2Tim4:3-4

God said He wrote "His Laws" in the heart of the New Covenant believer Heb8:10 which included the 4th commandment- they went from written on tablets of stone (10 commandments) to written on tablets of the heart2Cor3:3. Jesus Himself said it was LAWFUL to do good on the Sabbath Mat12:12 and one could still do evil on the Sabbath Mark3:4 (profane it Neh13:17 just as we were warned in the NT about being disobedient like those who came before us and why they could not enter their rest of the promise land Eze20:15-16 Heb4:6,11) Jesus Himself said the Sabbath would be kept after His death Mat24:20 why the apostles kept every Sabbath decades and decades later just as Jesus indicated Isa56:6-7

Act 15:21 For Moses has had throughout many generations those who preach him in every city, being read in the synagogues every Sabbath.

Acts 13:44 On the next Sabbath almost the whole city came together to hear the word of God.

Acts 18:4 4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded both Jews and Greeks.


and will be kept by "all flesh" His saints eternity thus saith the Lord Isa66:22-23 -

Jesus said out of His own mouth the Sabbath was made for mankind Mark2:27 for everyone who loves His name, wants to join themselves to Him and serve Him Isa56:6. This idea that the 4th commandment, the one God said to Remember was forgotten in our Bibles in the NT against the will of God's spoken and written Testimony Exo31:18 and His promise Psa89:34 Mat5:18-19
Upvote 0

The Final Experiment (Flat Earth Bites The Dust)

It takes too much space, that is why I put " ... " in it ?

Anyway, my new point:

" Yes, by the 1940s, the knowledge that the Earth is round was common, having been accepted for centuries in educated societies "

View attachment 373900

Why they didn't use globus like a normal human ? :D

Same when H-person was looking at maps in WW2 , why didn't he use globus ? :D

The '...' thing from you is pointless because the word limit for these posts are literally in the hundreds. There's no need for it.

As for why globes weren't used... I'm sorry but that is such an incredibly idiotic question it beggars belief that you would ask it. Especially when the answer is staring you in the face. Also: never heard of a map?
  • Like
Reactions: David Lamb
Upvote 0

The Mamdani Model: More Socialist Mayors to ComeBeware! The DSA will attempt to repeat Mamdani’s success in other Democrat strongholds.

Not by "religion."
I thought you just said that they don't want to be told what to do by some religious group.
Or you can just define them out of existence.
I am not sure what you mean. Who is being defined out of existence.
Because I don't consider them a threat to Constitutional government.
So you only see men and religious groups as a threat. What about other identity groups as a threat. Just because you don't see them as a threat doesn't mean they are not a threat. Some people see the rise of Marxist ideology a threat.

We have seen the rise in radical groups in recent years due to the culture war. More extreme politics and people willing to use violence. Why single out some groups and not others. Seems like playing identity politics.
Not at the groups, only at their public policy agenda.
Ok so why is it only about these groups public policy agendas. Do not other groups like say women, non religious groups of various sorts, environmental groups, BLM groups, Femninist, Marxist, Socialist, Trans activists groups, Liberal or progressive groups that push their agenda.

Why is it the religious group (specifically Christian) and specifically men. What is it about the religious groups policy agenda that should be singled out as opposed to other identity groups.
Not a chance. You'll just have to define them as non religious because they are progressives.
Ok it doesn't matter. Like I said it really is a choice between whether abortion is ok or not. Or whether its biblical marriage or not. Its just to be a progressive within the Left you have to accept moral positions that will conflict with biblical norms.

Your more likely to end up in that situation by the fact that progressive in secular society means whatever the current generation thinks is morally ok. That happens to be pro choice and SSM ect.
They mave have started out as moral precepts but the state has no power to make a moral judgement, only a legal one.
What do you mean "They may have started out as moral precepts"

Is not a legal judgement include the moral aspect. If pro choice is protected for abortion is that not also making a moral judgement that the State is allowing pro choice over anti abortion. Its an ethical dilemma. A choice between two ethical scenarios. One persons rights over anothers. Thats moral.
They were all protesting the actions of the state, not its ideology.
I though they were protesting 'white supremecy and the white system of oppression' that had been institutionalised. If people protest against the States laws of say anti abortion what is the difference between whether its the State aparatus or the actions of such.

Why is it not all about what is morally right or wrong regardless of whether its the State system or the actions of those representing the State. Its still about morality.
You think all of that is anti-Christian?
No I am saying these are all associated with ethics. The State cannot seperate morality out of these situations. The State is the body of humans who are the political party with their set of political ideologies which includes moral precepts.
Injustice is what they are protesting. The immorality of it is for the clergy who also oppose it to consider..
The 'Injustice' is the morality lol.
And somebody later added, "Be careful they don't hate Him because of Christians."
Yes that was Satan trying to conflate evil with Christ. You know very well what I mean and the world will hate Christians because of Christs truth. Do you think this is truth.

Do you think there is a difference in the morals of this world and Christians under Christ. Do you think we are all sinners and that need Christ.
Which Trump is trying to turn the US into, at the behest of his Christian Nationalist base.
No its not just Trump and radical Christians. Thats just a reaction to other radical groups that have been allowed to fester and bring chaos. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

Christ church is not even in the game. They are out there somewhere and I think rising as their own group that is different to the rest. A light in the darkness of all this culture wars.
AOC is a devout Christian and Mandami is a Shia Muslim with a version of the Ten Commandments tougher and more specific than yours.
Politics has come down to identity and politicians like AOC have been the cultivaters of such hate and division by making everything about race, gender and other identities. How do you know AOC is not a wolf in sheeps clothing. Ilhan Omar is another,

It seems to me this type of politics of lies and misrepresentations is very harmful and bad fruit.
Upvote 0

Has Hitler replaced Satan?

Who, besides hitler, and moses, had all the homosexuals killed? And made it a crime or heavily restricted interracial unions? Obviously every tribe and culture has had this problem occasionally, but to the extent it was codified in their culture and laws for more than 100 years?.. or are we afraid to say who had this problem?

I mean systemic nation wide edict, not individuals in a local town.
It is not so much laws which may be wrong and cruel, your post seems to skip the significance of aggressively crushing dissent, the right to express opposing ideas, secret agents operating inside a country on it's own residents, censorship of the arts, and forbidding opposition political representation.

Otherwise, if you don't like the laws, you don't like who is in power...vote them out.
Upvote 0

6 Craziest Revelations From Scathing Report on Kash Patel — Including His Refusal to Leave a Plane Until He Was Given a Female Agent’s Jacket

I dono, Edgar could really rock the lingerie of the time.
I'm sure he was the belle of the ball.

j edgar hoover drag.jpg


-- A2SG, Kash has big, very stylish, high heeled shoes to fill....

Attachments

  • j edgar hoover drag.jpg
    j edgar hoover drag.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 4
  • Like
Reactions: Aryeh Jay
Upvote 0

Anyone up for a chat thread?

I will just wait and see, there is a staff meeting on Monday.
Replying to myself, just to point out that nothing was said at all about conflict resolution at the meeting. It was all Christmas and New Year celebrations and opening times. Even the parties are part of the project's services, because we have those with no other gatherings they can go to, and a sober Christmas party is a lifeline for some.

Sorry, no solutions for squabbling parishioners here.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,007
Messages
65,427,949
Members
276,417
Latest member
Gracie Swift