Federal agents launch another operation in St. Paul
- By MarcusGregor
You are sadly mistaken.Most people don't buy it. They can see the radicalism and see the crime.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are sadly mistaken.Most people don't buy it. They can see the radicalism and see the crime.
Who signed the Banking Act of 1935?What scheme was that?
I am not sure which party you're talking about but there is not really anything socially conservative about homosexuality. The closest thing we have to social conservatism + fiscal liberalism is groyperismThere is a political party in the US that is exactly that, socially conservative and fiscally liberal. I am a member of it and a few others here are a member of it too. And one doesn't need to be a socialist or communist to be fiscally liberal no matter how much the political conservatives scream that you are if you are fiscally liberal. This political party hails Pro-Life legislature and fair LGB rights responsibly (there is no push for T rights which most Christians would agree). Do a Google search on political parties in the US and there you will find it listed.
Yes. But has sin affected how free a person's will is actually going to function?Did God create his intelligent children with free will?
Nothing that you, Odel, Skiba and other Flat Earthers post is edifying - not when you accuse us of not believing Genesis and/or being liars.
JP Morgan had invested the current equivalent of millions of dollars in Tesla’s ideas. He saw no return on his investment so naturally didn't continue investing more. You make it out as if rich people deliberately blocked Tesla’s developments because his ideas would erode their profits in other areas, which is factually baseless like most of your claims.Of course I do, but Tesla would have achieved his dream if only people had of believed in him, but unfortunately there were rich powerful people who stood in his way who's interest was only money. $
It does nothing of the sort.This just proves that free electricity was possible.
Then he can go with her. Tragic story that could have been avoided if she had followed the law. Therefore, the tragedy is entirely her fault and those that enabled her to stay.
Agree.Abundance to what end?
I don’t see any implication of St. Paul having had abundance in terms of personal comfort.
My position, that he was an ascetic, stands.
Correct. It is the Chaplain's job to advise commanders on morality. The JAG advises on how to accomplish the commanders objective legally.Charitably speaking, a military lawyer's job is to explain to the commander how the commander can get his mission done legally. The lawyer doesn't say, "You can't do it," the lawyer says, "This is how to do it legally."
Without speaking charitably, that job does not necessarily involve invoking any kind of personal moral views. The morality of the matter is encoded within the applicable laws.
For instance, the Law of Armed Conflict (which includes applicable portions of the Geneva Conventions) states that US forces are prohibited from attacking a school or hospital--unless enemy forces are already using that school or hospital as an operational location. In that case, US forces may attack that school or hospital. The Law of Armed Conflict (in concert with the Geneva Conventions) places the moral fault on the forces that first began using those buildings for miltary purposes.
That particular lawyer may personally feel different. He may feel that the US should not under any circumstances attack a school or hospital. But it's not his job to transmit his own personal morality, but the morality encapsulated in the LOAC.
Depends on how they interpret the current Congressional resolutions. The president has presented his interpretation...it's up to Congress to dispute it.
Which Congress hasn't done yet.
What we think about in the peanut gallery is for us to make clear on election day.
Investigation won't turn up anything wrong. It's like me telling my son to obey the law and don't do anything illegal, regardless of who wants you to.![]()
Pentagon investigating Sen. Mark Kelly over 'refuse illegal orders' video
The Pentagon said it is reviewing whether Sen. Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, broke military law by urging troops to refuse unlawful orders.www.usatoday.com
This should be interesting.
He learned lawfare from Roy Cohn, one of the fiercest ever (until he got sick and died).But how can this be? Trump does not use "lawfare"...
I see Comey’s lie right there in that article and I heard his lie while testifying to the Senate.Maybe you can help the prosecution find the lie, because they seem to be struggling on that point:
![]()
The Situation: Where’s the Lie?
The government’s response to James Comey’s vindictive prosecution raises one very big and important question.www.lawfaremedia.org
Here the specific text of the question Comey answered in his testimony matters a lot—for a number of reasons. Grassley asked Comey: “have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation” (emphasis added).
It is thus not adequate for proof that Comey made a false statement for the government to show that Richman interfaced with reporters on Comey’s behalf. That fact has never been a secret (Richman did much of this work in the open and on a named basis), and Comey has never denied it. In fact, it was Comey who dramatically announced Richman’s role in Senate testimony that the brief later quotes (see pages 10-11).
Rather, to prove that Comey lied, the government has to show (a) that Richman was “at the FBI” at the time; (b) that Comey “authorized” the press contact; (c) that he authorized Richman to do the contact anonymously; and (d) that the contact concerned the Trump or Clinton investigation.
The article then goes on to do what seems to me to be a very good job explaining how none of the things the prosecution tries to point to in their filing as evidence actually show the aforementioned things required to make Comey's statement false. So, where's the lie?
That said, once again, even if the government had the strongest evidence possible that Comey lied, that wouldn't have any effect on the question of whether Halligan's appointment was lawful.
My mistake. Fresher data shows around 30,000 Americans convert to Islam annually, a number that has shown an increase, particularly in recent years.Also you math isn't mathing very well.
A "23% increase of converts to Islam (20,000 Americans annually)" sure reads as if the raw number of convert rose from about 16000/year to 20000/year in some unspecified time frame.
LOL!The only thing they should be teaching in college (or any educational class from K thru 12) about gender identity is that males are males and females are females and if you think otherwise, you have a mental disability.
From the description I thought you were clearly describing Mt Trump who fits the description very well.I'm not referring to Trump as I already mentioned. I'm referring to Mamdani.
Please ask who a person is referring to next time instead of assuming it's Trump.