• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Midrash "Chayei Sarah" (Sarah lives) GEN 23:1-25:18

PARASHAH: “Chayei Sarah” (Sarah lives) GENESIS 23:1-25:18


The title of the Parashah or Torah portion is “Sarah lives” or “Sarah lived”. Yet Sarah is dead, so how does she live? She lives on in the memory of Abraham; her legacy lives on, her influence lives on, and this is what the patriarch wants for Isaac.

So even dead, Sarah continued to live on as a godly wife and mother, no doubt that Abraham wanted to bless Isaac with a similar wife. The Bible says that Sarah lived 127 years. It is not often that the Torah records the age of women, but Sarah is the exception.

One way we can look at this is, from the Hebrew text, “One-hundred years, and seven years, and twenty years. Why is this worded this way? The rabbis say that when Sarah was one hundred years old, she was as beautiful as when she was twenty, and when she was twenty, she was as innocent and holy as when she was seven.

127 can also symbolize “echad” (1) "unit of oneness" , (2)“Two united with God in a covenant blessing” (7) “godliness.” Sarah received the blessing of being a godly woman, who joined in the “covenant blessing” of Abraham with YHVH, and together became “Echad Am” (One people), the Hebrew people who later became the Nation of Israel.

When we add 1+2+7, we get 10, which is the number of “Torah” (some say “law” Personally, I don't like using that word; it is misunderstood, but “Torah” means “instruction.” Sarah honored Abraham and YHVH by submitting to their instruction; she was submissive, in the right way. Yet Sarah had her times of happiness and sorrow, as all marriages go through.

Abraham and Sarah loved each other, and in death, Abraham showed his love towards Sarah by purchasing an overpriced piece of real estate. 400 silver shekels was a lot for a cave on a piece of property in Hebron, but He didn't mind paying for it, It had to be “written down, and documented” legally, not just “words”, we see that today, words are nothing, but if it is signed, sealed, written down, you can take it to court!

So Abraham honored his wife both in life and in death. One of the biggest and drastic changes in one’s life is the “death” of a spouse. We see the words in the Torah that recount the time of Sarah’s death.

And Abraham came to mourn for Sarah and to weep for her. And Abraham stood up from before his dead, and spoke unto the sons of Heth, saying…”

There is a time for mourning and weeping, and a time for joy, a time for continuing with life, as life does go on, with or without a spouse. Abraham had the right to mourn and weep, since Sarah was part of his life for many, many years. We do not know when they got married, but when Abraham was called by Adonai, he was 75 years old, and he was married at that time. We could say that for about 50 years, Abraham had Sarah by his side. The Adonai called her home.

There will be a time when Adonai calls home our spouses. How will we respond when that happens? Will we cry out to God? Why? But are our spouses our own? Or do we all belong to Elohim? What are we but souls inhabiting finite bodies, which will eventually cease to function and return to the earth?

A baby enters the world with clenched fists, yet leaves the world with open hands. We all want to hold on to everything, even spouses, yet we have to let go and let God have his way. A spouse, a wife or husband, is like a library book. We will take the library book and read it cover to cover. Do we understand what we read? We have “x” amount of years to do it. But the master Librarian will call for his book to be returned someday, and we will have to deal with that.

A spouse is like a jewel to be worn and cared for, for “x” number of years, but the Jeweler will call for his gem someday, and we will have to take “her” or “him” off and return “her” or “him” to the Jeweler of all creation. I think that the more we love our spouse, the more difficult it will be for us to let go someday when our spouse is at death’s door. It wasn’t easy for Abraham, and it will not be easy for us.

I think that the time for caring, for loving, for giving flowers is now, when our spouses are alive, not at the grave site. One wonders what the surviving spouse will say? “May he (or she) rest in peace!” …or…” Now that he (or she) is gone, I can rest in peace!!” Abraham wept and mourned, but then, he got up and “buried his dead out of his sight.” He continued with life, searched out a wife for his son Isaac, and eventually Abraham got remarried, to Keturah, who bore him six children (Chap 25).

There is life after the loss of a loved one. The most difficult part of losing a loved one, especially a spouse, is if the spouse is an unbeliever, lost, without salvation. THEN we shall never see that spouse again, EVER! All the more reason to be “equally yoked.” To lose a spouse in death is to be separated for “a season” but be reunited with her or him later on in heaven. That is the way we have to look at it, because it is the truth.

Some people, like Abraham, will marry again; others will not. That is a decision every widow or widower will have to make.

The true meaning of the word “love” is NOT about feelings. "Love" is a verb in Hebrew, "Ahav." John 3:16 demonstrates that. "For God so LOVED the world that he GAVE his only begotten son..." Love is giving. The giving and sharing of one's life with another. He proved his love toward us that He GAVE His Only Son, Yeshua, as a sacrifice for our sin.

When a couple chooses to marry, share life together, provide for one another, in health and in sickness, and not “cop out” on each other, THAT is TRUE LOVE. Abraham stuck by Sarah for over 100 years, in good times and in bad times, like the time of drought, the “Egypt” times, the “Ishmael” times, and the long-awaited “Isaac” times.

Abraham sent his servant Eliezar to look for a wife for Isaac. He carried 10 camels with gifts, the “bride price” for the “bride to be”. He had to go to Mesopotamia, to Abraham's family, He did NOT want a Canaanite woman for the bride of Isaac, a pagan Canaanite woman would have been an “unequal yoke” that is wisdom for us today, a “born again believer” should only marry another “born again believer” where the two worship and serve the “same God YHVH/Yeshua”

Eliezar observed “Rebecca's actions.” Rivka watered the thirsty camels, sought not her own comfort, but had a servant's heart. This is what Elazar was looking for: Abraham would be happy, and so would Isaac. The “engagement jewelry” was a nose ring and gold bracelets. Today, in our society, we give an engagement ring.

Abraham wanted a wife like Sarah for his son, Isaac. We might think, what kind of wife (or husband) would a believer look for? Well, there are certain qualities to look for in looking for one’s “life mate”.

If a man is looking for a woman to be his wife. I would think that he might want a woman whose first love is for God, for Yeshua, and to obey and follow the Torah. That the woman also be humble, who will run the home with wisdom, and will manage money with wisdom, being a wise spender. She should be a woman who will raise her children according to the Word of God, and to not waste time with “fairy tale reading” but with “Torah/Bible Tale reading”

Just as “Riv’kah” was willing to follow Eliezar to Isaac’s home, so should the wife be willing to follow her husband. Where he is, she should be as well. UNLESS there is some sort of danger or unwise decision-making on the husband’s part, then the wife needs to help the husband “re-think” the decision.

Now “Rivka” had to be “willing to go with Elazar to be Isaac's wife”. We can see this is our relationship with Yeshua. Yeshua/Jesus is the “bridegroom” and we, the “Kehillah” (Congregation of “called out ones”), are the bride. We have to be a “willing bride” to go with our “heavenly bridegroom”.

Just as Elazar brought gifts to the bride-to-be, Yeshua has given “gifts” to us as HIS Bride: Salvation (Yeshuah), an eternal home/mansion in Heaven, spiritual gifts to do service and minister with. Healthy bodies (for the most part) in which to inhabit, spouses and children, jobs to earn a living, if we think about the list could go on, as to the “Blessings” we have through Yeshua.

Yeshua is looking for a willing bride to follow HIM. Not by force, but by love. He showed us His love by being the sacrifice lamb. Our sin debt has been paid. Will we accept the bridegroom? He has eternal blessings for his precious bride.

Shavua Tov. Have a blessed week.

The Truth About Texas

I doubt it. Candidate filing starts in February, and they need to know what district they're filing for.

Trump and Texas missed the deadline to call this off. They wanted gerrymandering, they're gonna get it.

Our hands were tied! We didn't WANT gerrymandering, but we HAD to vote for gerrymandering!

Baloney.

I'm just not buying it. Democrats will gladly take this opportunity for a power grab, as would Republicans. Despite all of their claims to the contrary, what all politicians want is power, not "fair, independent, nonpartisan" voting.

Actions speak louder than words, and when you vote FOR something you claim you're against, I just do not believe that you are against it.
  • Like
Reactions: Fervent
Upvote 0

Gallup: Drop in U.S. Religiosity Among Largest in World

This is not public information, as it is for charities.
That's true, and at a certain size I see no reason to object to 990s but I'm not sure how many churches have the administrative capabilities of filing those kinds of forms. So perhaps if some threshold was established, or even only requiring it of denominations rather than local church bodies. Though I'm still not sure how it would fly with the free exercise clause.
Upvote 0

Are the Jews Israel, or is the church Israel? Or does it depend on the context of the passage?

And?



I beg to disagree. You are just teaching what you have been taught.

Show us any Scripture that teaches a rapture of the Church, followed by a tribulation period of any length, followed by a third coming of the Lord?
The scripture references are on this chart I made...

first reusrecction.jpg
Upvote 0

For those who are gamers, how do you handle Christian Ethics vs gaming?

I hope I'm posting in the right spot, if I'm not, my apologies and please move it to where it needs to be.

I want to talk about video games, table top games, etc and look at it from a place of Christian moral ethics. To give an example, I play the game Medieval Dynasty, which is mostly just building a city and managing it with all the resources. But due to it being close to Halloween, they've updated it to give the main towns halloween decorations. This isn't standard decorations... This looks purely pagan witchcraft to me.

View attachment 371968

So when you run across instances like this, what do you do? I'm not required to engage with it. Like, there isn't quests or anything but how do you handle video games and following Christian ethical standards? (This is just an example as I mean this discussion to be more broad than just the example I'm showing).

On a related note, similar questions arise with other types of games, like online casino or slot games, where themes or visuals can be intense. I like such games, and I play them from time to time, especially pokies. A few days ago, I came across this link https://pokiesman1.net/free-pokies/dragon-link/ where I managed to try a free online pokie called Dragon Link. I liked that there is a free version, which helped me to understand more about the game. To be honest, I don't know if something like this is acceptable, but I know the limits, and I play for fun
If it doesn’t affect gameplay and you’re not being forced to take part in anything you’re uncomfortable with, I think it really comes down to your own comfort level. Some players just ignore the decorations and keep playing, some turn off seasonal events if the game allows it, and some skip the game for a bit until the update passes. I’ve had moments in other games where something didn’t sit right with me, and I just asked myself: “Is this actually affecting me, or is it just background art I can walk past?” Most of the time it’s the latter. So I’d say do what works for you. If it bothers you, take a break or switch the game off until the event ends. If it doesn’t impact your experience, just keep building your town and enjoying the game. No one handles these things the same way, and that’s fine.
Upvote 0

Vatican stops use of titles for Mary

That's your WHOLE response? As if this is infallible teaching or something? Am I understanding you correctly here?
No - it is pointing out that the pope approved of the document - nothing to get apoplectic over. Obviously, if the good pope found error, as you have, he would not have agreed with the writing.
Upvote 0

Trump meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at White House

Yeah, I think that Khashoggi’s being a WaPo reporter was not an impediment to any business dealings with his murderer.

One would hope so.
Yup

Perhaps you think that Trump should have taken Biden's moral high ground and given up on peace in the Middle East, as Biden did.
============
Let's be very, very clear.

In both terms, Trump is doing more to bringing us closer to peace in Middle East than anyone since Jimmy Carter.

FIRST TERM
The Abraham Accords were a huge, huge move forward. Arab countries were finally accepting Israel's right to exist as a country. Also, as a side discussion the Arabs and Israel agreed that the enemy was Iran and the terrorists that they financed throughout the region. Trump made them see common cause. Trump also had them understand the business benefits from having peace between Israel and the Sunni Arabs.

IN BETWEEN
crickets from Biden
Hamas started a war
crickets from Biden

SECOND TERM
Trump again made peace in the Middle East his #1 priority. Trump supported all of Israel's efforts to remove the terrorist threats in the region and their efforts to greatly disable Iran. Trump then got the Arabs to look the other way as Israel continued to be aggressive in killing Arab terrorists and also so many Palestinian citizens in Gaza.

Trump finally bombed Iran! He then got Israel to agree to a peace deal and to implement the first steps.
Upvote 0

Swatting Trolls v. Encouraging Saints—Who Wins When Threads Go Sideways?

To answer the title question, moderators. :sunglasses:Moderators always win. :p

Share one sentence rule you follow when the trolls arrive.
Debate or Report.

If reported, do not debate, and if debated, do not report. If reported, then letting any algorithms bury things is good until the mods show up. As far as I know, forums don’t use algorithms, but letting the thread roll along instead of responding is the wise course. You don’t want your posts to get caught in a moderation evaluation.

If the post breaks the rules of the forum, report, if it does not, debate.
Upvote 0

Can not being in the correct denomination cause someone to not be saved?

this has worried me, do I need to be a Catholic to be saved, or a Protestant? Or does the denomination have nothing to do with it?
-

The only way you are saved is if you believe in Jesus for Eternal Life, God's free gift.
Upvote 0

Newsome pushed back against Democracy to achieve his political goals

Meanwhile, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against Texas' new congressional maps, finding they were "racially gerrymandered".

  • Like
Reactions: Fervent
Upvote 0

what is Calvinism answer to how God works?

Mark Quayle said:
—"What more is needed"? Context is needed. It is not talking about him desiring that absolutely all sapient sentients responsible to God be saved, nor even all humans.
—"What more is needed"? Reasoning use of language is needed. It is not double-minded for God to feel outrage at disbelief and to call it desire for the opposite (I say, supposing, for the sake of argument, that the verse was stand-alone, which it is not).


That was an "as if", in case you didn't pick up on it. I'm not saying that reasoning use of language is needed, but that if one assumes what you do, they still should look into use of language, without proof-texting as though the verse was stand-alone, when plain language can mean more than just God doesn't get what he planned on and hoped for. The notion that God doesn't get what he planned on is akin to the notion that God will not complete what he began.

I notice you left the first statement completely alone. Again, read the verse in context. It is not saying that God wishes or hopes that all humanity will be saved.
What is the context that is supposed to change "who wants everyone to be saved and return to knowledge of the truth" into something other than desiring all to be saved?
Nor yours, lacking basis for its existence —I hope you can see that.
You presume that God cannot make free will possible, you think too little of God in your assessment.
Continuing your confirmation bias —not to mention a circular argument. You are using your assumptions and definitions to prove your assumptions and definitions.
It's not confirmation bias, it's reality. Nor is it "circular' since its not 2 propositions dependent on one another, simply a fact that the determinist must exercise free will to make a denial of it.
Yep, definitely confirmation bias. You take me saying "choice" as defined by "free will". Choice is not free will. Do dogs choose? Of course they do. So do robots. I'm not saying we are dogs nor robots, but compare our wills and our choices to God's. —It does not even compute. We don't operate on his level. Not even close.
you don't seem to know what that word means.
Upvote 0

Global Leaders comments on our President and the historic peace plan

The "Board of peace" is vague and fluffy language so far. We don't know what it will do.
It COULD be a good strategy to keep it that way for now.
But given Netanyahu is a bit like Trump - a hard right guy avoiding jail by staying in power - he REALLY wants to keep the hard right in his coalition happy! Otherwise, jail! So when he says he does not support Palestinian statehood - the world better take notice.

What's Trump's plans for that? For Israel in the West Bank?

Are they going to spank Israel's Militant Zionists when they inevitably break this agreement because they want to steal all Palestinian land?
Are they going to expel over half a MILLION illegal Zionist settlers in the West Bank? Are they going to give territorial sovereignty to the West Bank as well as Gaza?

I'm listening to a history of this whole conflict right now, and let me let you in on a little secret. There's only one reason that Gaza was handed over to the Palestinians. Israel ran out of Jews! That's it.

Israel decided to continue their slow 'killing me softly' strategy of illegal settler colonisation in the West Bank where they could concentrate their population resources. But they ran out of foreign Jews willing to uproot from their homelands and move on mass into another country to colonise it!

If expelling over 500,000 illegal colonisers from the West Bank is not part of the Palestinian solution - there is no Palestinian solution.

They also need to build an internationally protected DMZ super-highway and fast rail between Gaza and the West Bank so that Palestine can have a functional state.
Upvote 0

Why Zohran Mamdani won and New York will pay a terrible price

I'm very very happy in the USA and don't want to live anywhere else. If others don't like being an American and living in the USA, then what is stopping them from moving to those Scandavian nations?
It's not "happy you are in the US" it's "Are you happy?"


Youre culture is making SAD people. IT has nothing to do with appreciating where you live. IT has to do with your ecosystem your "fish tank".
Upvote 0

CNN Dem Panelist Shocks Jennings with Major Admission on Lawfare Against Trump

Schumer could come right out and say they completely framed the guy, and it still wouldn't make any difference. They've had 'Trump is pure evil' drilled into their heads too much by now.

"Framed" makes it sound like he's innocent of the charges. Do you think he's innocent of the various charges brought against him, or do you just think the alleged crimes were minor enough that they weren't worth prosecuting?
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,369
Messages
65,416,642
Members
276,379
Latest member
Leading Lady