Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All right, gotta give you a hand for that one.And you'll never guess who Luke's father is...
AI is not only a summary of popular positions but also tends to be very agreeable with the position you feed it and mirrors your own bias. It's not trying to challenge you or argue with you, it's trying to help you so will often present answers that easily align with your own thought process. The answer you have feels more of a summary by the way its outlined but it could just be the style of the AI you're using.Great question — Colossians 2:16 is often cited in discussions about whether Christians are still required to keep the Sabbath commandment (the Fourth Commandment). Let's look at the verse carefully, in its full context, and then assess whether it refers to the weekly Sabbath from the Ten Commandments or ceremonial sabbaths in the Law of Moses.
Colossians 2:16–17 (NKJV)
Key Questions:
1. What kind of “sabbaths” is Paul talking about?
Let’s break the phrase down:
This phrase appears in many places in the Old Testament, often in this same order, and always refers to ceremonial observances:
- 1 Chronicles 23:31
- 2 Chronicles 2:4
- 2 Chronicles 31:3
- Nehemiah 10:33
- Ezekiel 45:17
- Hosea 2:11
These texts link festivals, new moons, and sabbaths as ceremonial observances — part of the Mosaic (Levitical) system, not the weekly seventh-day Sabbath of the Ten Commandments.
That’s why Paul says in Col. 2:17:
In other words, these ceremonial laws pointed forward to Christ and found their fulfillment in Him.
2. Is the weekly Sabbath also a shadow?
There’s a strong distinction between:
Type of Law Description Shadow of Christ? Abolished in Christ? Moral Law (10 Commandments) Eternal moral principles (Ex. 20) ❌ No ❌ No Ceremonial Law Feasts, sacrifices, rituals, sabbaths tied to festivals (Lev. 23) ✅ Yes ✅ Yes
- The weekly Sabbathwas:
- Given at Creation (Genesis 2:2–3)
- Reinforced in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:8–11)
- Not instituted as a shadow, but as a memorial of creation
- The ceremonial sabbaths(e.g., Day of Atonement, Feast of Trumpets) are:
- Called sabbaths too (see Leviticus 23)
- Fall on various days, not necessarily the seventh day
- Shadows pointing to Jesus' work
Therefore, when Paul talks about “sabbaths which are a shadow”, he refers to these ceremonial sabbaths, not the weekly Sabbath of the Fourth Commandment.
3. Did Jesus or the Apostles abolish the weekly Sabbath?
- Jesus kept the Sabbath (Luke 4:16)
- The disciples kept the Sabbath after Jesus' death (Acts 13:42, 16:13, 17:2, 18:4)
- Hebrews 4:9 says:
✅ Conclusion:
Colossians 2:16 does not cancel the weekly Sabbath commandment.
It refers to ceremonial sabbaths, along with food and drink offerings, and religious festivals that were shadows pointing to Christ.
The Fourth Commandment Sabbath is not a shadow, but a memorial of creation and a sign of God’s sanctifying work (Exodus 31:13, Ezekiel 20:12).
2. But Which Commandment Does God Emphasize Most in the Bible?
✅ The Fourth Commandment (Sabbath) is the only one God:
- Calls "My holy day" (Isaiah 58:13)
- Links to Creation (Genesis 2:1–3; Exodus 20:11)
- Uses to test Israel's obedience before Sinai (Exodus 16)
- Commands to remember as a sign between Him and His people (Ezekiel 20:12, 20)
- Institutes as a covenantal sign (Exodus 31:13–17)
The Fourth Commandment is the most directly spoken about by God throughout the Bible. It is personally claimed by Him, reaffirmed repeatedly, and tied to His identity as both Creator and Sanctifier.
Jewish believers = Church, there isn't a distinction of Jew/Gentile in the ChurchDon't you see your statement here as irrational and self-contradictory? You claim an on-going conversation between Jesus and his Disciples have nothing to do with his Disciples and instead apply to a future group of Christian who are not present or involved in the conversation. Jesus is, in fact, explaining what will happen to "these Jewish believers" who he is talking to! To say otherwise appears to be irrational to me. Sorry!
Yes you are a "Partial Preterist" believing in 70AD fulfillment in Roman ArmiesYou're making a terrible prejudgment and error here. You've claimed I'm a Preterist without evidence that I am one. And I'm *not* a Preterist!
So, you're guilty of slandering me, and should apologize for your failed judgment. There are those who think I'm at least partly a Preterist because of my belief that Jesus spoke, in his Olivet Discourse, of things that would happen in his own generation. But it is true that Jesus did in fact speak of things to happen in his own generation, even if he also spoke of things that would continue on for many generations of Jews.
Jesus didn't speak of the temple destruction in his generation, yes you claim the great tribulation started in 70AD and will continue until the 2nd coming, you have taken a 3.5 year end time great tribulation and stretched it out over millennia filling a 2,000 year gapThe "Great Tribulation" Jesus spoke of was not a "gap." That is a ridiculous statement! Who ever said anything about a "gap?"
Jesus indicated in Luke 21 in the clearest possible way that Jerusalem and the Temple would fall in his own generation, which took place in 70 AD. And he said in the clearest possible way that this would be but the beginning of a long tribulation for the Jewish People, consisting of an age-long Diaspora.
It would only end, according to Jesus, at his Return. All this is explicitly stated in Luke 21, and your failure to simply read and accept the account as is amazes me. How can I argue with people who deny what their own eyes see?
I disagree, you create two peoples of God in stating Jewish believers, the Church in Jerusalem is instructed to "Flee" Jerusalem during the Great tribulation, into the wilderness of Gilead, Bashan, CarmelThe "Tribulation" is, by self-evident definition, the loss of Israel's homeland and a wandering of the Jewish People, both by believing Jews and unbelieving Jews. Though it would be due to unbelieving Jews that this judgment would come, but all Jews, including believers, would suffer as a result.
The unfortunate thing is that Jewish believers would suffer double. Not only would they lose their own homeland, due to no fault of their own, but they would also suffer from the wickedness of unbelieving Jews who bring on this judgment. They would also suffer outside of Israel where they would be homeless among the pagan Gentiles.
My issue is that when I do a Google search, the AI part often pops up with claims that are completely wrong. Now, I realize that can happen with things humans toss up, too. But if I have to fact check everything AI tells me, what good is it?
I think I've seen a movie along those lines.Image of the beast = a hologram of a man speaking, a man seemingly healed from death Rev 13:3, talking blaspheme about what is outside of the sky Rev 13:6. Projected hologram technology, coming up from even phones. A.i. inside of the phones will keep track of who watches and who does not, and will be able to send out a signal to kill those who don't. Most live their lives around/with the device already today. The technology that would allow for such an interactive signal to be sent out is in place as of today, the a.i. is being trained today, the hologram technology is being perfected today.
IE, a Magic AI. Sorry, but when you invoke magic the whole scenatio kinda falls apart. If it's just magic, none of the techno-foolery is unnecessary, just magic it from end to end.Abomination of desolation = a special quantum computer put in a newly built temple, one connects to it via the mark, the computer will actually store and monitor consciousness, and be able to transfer it into hosts, one would be able to be conscious inside of the computer without a body, or even transfer into a robot body, causing literal desolation as humanity connects to it and lives in it.
Because magic again.It is the devil's offer of seeming eternal life, most will go along with it
That's always an incentive, and this yime no magic necessary., those who don't will be killed.
Yeah, at this point it's kind of kind of turned into a B movie.The second resurrection serves to also resurrect souls out of the abomination. (No we're not in it now, there would be no touch, and it would likely be first presented as that you can go to 'heaven' and back, after half the time he comes out and admits he's the devil hoping people will simply accept his offer, believing the lie that they will not die)
HelloI don't know if my church believes in the rapture. That is what the discussion is going to be about i.e. their stance. I was raised believing in the rapture but not sure I believe in it now.

What would you have preferred them to do? How do you see the charge to evangelize?
Aversion to proselytism seems to be a secular and rather anti-religious dogma. The reason someone within a secular culture would be averse is because they would be taught by secularism that proselytism involves insincerity and an objectification of persons. But anyone who is a Christian believes in evangelization and arguably proselytism, and there is no reason to believe that evangelization must be insincere or involve objectification. Many would take it as a compliment that someone cares enough about them to broach a subject they deem serious. That someone cares enough about you and the faith to take it all seriously.
(I am presuming that this person does not know that you are a Protestant Christian, and maybe that's part of the difficulty here.)
Exactly. God has made irrevocable promises to Israel, which make no sense when people try applying them to the church or ignore altogether. I think it’s very important for Christians to rightly divide the scriptures and understand that there are three groups of people; Jews (Israel), Gentiles (non-Jews), and the church (born again believers-Jews and Gentiles).
“After the Cross a new entity came into existence—the church that Jesus Christ promised He would build (Mt 16:18). As a result, there are now three divisions of mankind: Jews, Gentiles and the church. Paul tells us that we are to “Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God” (1 Cor 10:32). It is absolutely essential to understand that these three groups exist side by side in today’s world, to distinguish between them, and to recognize that God deals with each differently.”
Because the shutdown needn't affect SNAP benefits. It only does because the Republicans want it that way.The Democrats are willing to keep the shutdown going regardless of SNAP being paid out or not.
Trump can say that he "lacks the legal authority" to provide funds, but he's lying.As of November 8, 2025, the Trump administration is actively seeking to withhold a portion of the funding needed to fully pay for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for November amid a government shutdown. The administration argues it lacks the legal authority and sufficient funds to provide the full amount. - Google
Only the Democrats signing the CR will result in an immediate resolution to SNAP and 1.5 civil servants finally getting paid.
You obviously have no interest in a real discussion if you can’t provide references for your own bullet points.Non responsive.