Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I knew I was wasting my time. I really knew it. When will I ever learn...Because...
Silly.The saying connects G-d's enduring promise to preserve the nation of Israel with the consistent, reliable cycle of the sun, drawing on biblical verses like Jeremiah 31:35-36 and Jeremiah 33:25-26. These passages state that G-d's covenant with Israel will only cease to be valid if the fundamental laws of creation, such as the sun rising and setting, were to fail. Therefore, the sun's continued shining is seen as evidence that the covenant and its promise of preservation remain in effect.
There is nothing wrong with censorship. Far from it.I started a new topic to address this issue again. Censorship?
No I was talking about the medal on the necklace. Sacred Heart of Jesus.Its definitely St.Benedict. The hoodie is the giveaway.View attachment 371277
Don’t even get me started on the number of rosaries I have!That's pretty awesome!
In Adam, all died. There are those that obeyed God in part, but Mary is the first with perfect obedience. As Canticles (song of Solomon) 6:8-9 saysMary was not the first to obey God.
These are just a few examples. The number of people who obeyed God, before Mary lived, are not recorded, but one can come to the reasonable conclusion that there were people obedient to God from the beginning to Mary. Just as there have been people obedient to God from the time of Mary to the present. Scripture records that there will be people obedient to God until the second coming.
- Adam and Eve obeyed God. There is an indeterminate period of time between the creation of Adam and Eve and the fall. See Genesis 2:25.
- Abel obeyed God. See Genesis 4:3-4.
- The sons of God in Genesis obeyed God until they started mingling with the daughters of men. See Romans 6:16, Romans 8:4, Romans 8:14.
- Noah obeyed God. See Genesis 6:22.
- Abraham obeyed God's charge, commandments, statutes, and laws. See Genesis 26:5.
NAR is like a conspiracy theory, taken too seriously. Tracing teachers back to contact with C Peter Wagner who being a lecturer, had many students. And drew his ideas from the best churches, and their contacts are then mistaken for NAR...Most of the arguments I have heard that there can only be 13 Apostles comes from cessationists, trying to end elements of the Bible to whittle away at callings and gifts. If they can start casting doubt on the ongoing validity of one thing in scripture they can cast doubt on anything else. That, and they hate the people that they can categorize New Apostolic Reformation, so if they can call contemporary apostles heretics they can discredit them with one accusation. And people like Sproul and MacArthur made a lot of money holding anti-Holly Spirit rallies. Those 3rd resort homes don't pay for themselves
Have you followed your own advice?2 Timothy 2:15-16 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
Seems straight-forward to me.
Hi Sfs, pardon my delay. It is generally known that Maxwell did not believe in Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. I read it in a letter of James Maxwell that I cannot find right now(but I give a MIT link where you will find the primary sources.) But we shouldn't be shocked by James Clerk Maxwell, the evangelical Christian who began the modern era of physics(according to Einstein) not accepting Darwin's theory. The truly brilliant scientists such as Michael Faraday(the evangelical who invented the idea of "fields" which underlies most physics today), Maxwell, Werner Heisenberg(the devout Protestant who won the Nobel for creating Quantum Mechanic/physics) and Einstein realized that yes science is an amazing tool; but science cannot -ever- explain the physical laws(working) of the universe. Albert Einstein said that even his great theory of General Relativity will be shown to be false one day. Read that again-for if you are not shocked by Einstein's statement then you have not really understood it.Is there a primary source that demonstrates this? I can't find any evidence that he rejected Darwin.
They voted for this.One president's "beauty" is a whole hospital's "bankruptcy."
It takes a particular kind of callousness to find "beauty" in the suffering of others.
I consider abortion a complex topic. Without any qualifying factors, I consider abortion to be tragic and wrong. But no, I don't compare abortion to the deliberate murder of children.
You just don't get it, all the issues have been addressed ad nauseum and this latest serving can be described by an analogy.So your not disputing the researchers. I am a bit confused now. If your disputing me how does this dispute the researchers. Perhaps thats your problem. That your hyper focused on me and not the evidence. I know I am not the best at trying to relay the researchers findings. But it is their work I am trying to highlight.
So therefore a good researcher will first get to understand that context by taking time to look at the whole article or video. The onus is on you to investigate the full article in its context before making and further comments about what the summary I made is about. Its just basic good epistemics.
More logical fallacies lol. What you gonna do now that I am saying your complaints about me pointing out the fallacies is just more logical fallacies.
This is what I have noticed. That most of your posts have been attacks on people. If its not the researchers are amateurs and whackos or whatever derogative names you use. Its me lol. Anyone who is so concerned to come on a social media site and name call others is obviously more concerned about other stuff besides the actual topic. The cold hard data.
Like I said demeaning people just shows that its personal lol. Its more than just data. You seem to be morally outraged over numbers. I am not calling you names and it does not bother me. But it seems to bother you.
And I already did. I have throughout this thread linked everything that they have put out. Maybe theres a couple more but they will be repeats of the same. You have to remember these tests and articles (most of them) have happened only in the last 12 months. Theres not a lot out there. I have given you everything lol. Its all there for you to investigate.
But back up just a minute. I think your missing the point. Lets clarify things.
Do you think some sort of lathing was used or not. Because all this complaints about tiny mislaignments ect is not going to change the fact that there is at least a level of symmetry and circularity that required some sort of lathing.
I can see what your doing. Your trying to introduce the doubt that the precision was not so great and that there was a wobble in the lathing and thus we can say the lathing was basic like the Bore stick technology so a logical explanation.
But lets just start with whether there was a lathe involved fullstop. Or no lathe was involved at all and these vases were made fully by shaping the roundness and symmetry by pounders and chisels and then rubbing.
Sadly innocent people pay for this. From I'm getting he care more for other countries. Than his own country .Elections have consequences. Everybody that voted for a white convicted felon rather than a black woman will own this.
Not if you get SSI. Then you don't have to have ever worked.
what do you mean specifically?
By the way, I forgot to mention, he goes to church. we discussed it a bit. As well, we are to do like Jesus did, eat with sinners. Socialise sinners. And be genuine friends not just to win them. But be the light. As well I have made clear I can`t make it. If there ever is something it`ll be a meal.
AND I see. perfectly. so do not waste your time and will always help. those to understand what I write and refuse to. rIf you can't see it, I'll stop responding. I'm not here to waist my time.
Aristarkos
I’m sure the farmers will have fun, and get a large bail out.
Is this code? I'm not understanding the post.
Is this code? I'm not understanding the post.
And if you see a verb is in. the NOMINATIVE CASE it means it. is the subject of that. verbIs this code? I'm not understanding the post.
And that makes it a "crime"?Sure. Being sacked is victimless crime. Being sacked has a significant impact on people’s lives. Especially if they have had that job for many years.