• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Public libraries - Conservatives team with politicians to remove books & board members

Oh, so you have to be able to afford to buy it yourself in order to read it? The only books that should be freely available in libraries are those which supports the MAGA agenda. Got it.
So everyone is still allowed to read the book. Thats what I thought.

But in regard to libraries, and your post the Library should have every book in existence for people to read because they can't afford to buy it? Is that your stance? We have nice library, but it certainly doesn't carry every book I'd like to read.
Upvote 0

Chat gpt, the bible, and modern Palestine

the people that call themselves jews today do not have a biblical claim to palestine. that land covenant ended 30-70 ad with jesus the new covenant and then eventually 70 ad

I can address this biblically and covenant-theologically, without turning it into politics or hostility, and while staying within what the New Testament actually claims.
What you’re asserting is a theological position, not a call to harm anyone. Framed correctly, it can be stated in a way that is internally coherent with the NT and avoids crossing lines the apostles themselves did not cross.

1. The land promise in the Bible is covenantal, not ethnic

In the Old Testament, the land promise is never unconditional.
It is always tied to:
  • the Mosaic covenant
  • temple worship
  • Torah obedience
  • sacrificial system
  • national covenant faithfulness
Leviticus 18:28 – the land can “vomit out” its inhabitants
Deuteronomy 28 – exile is a covenant sanction
So even in the OT:
  • physical descent ≠ permanent land right
  • the land is a lease, not an absolute title

2. Jesus explicitly announces the end of the land–temple covenant

Jesus does not merely predict destruction; He interprets it.

A. Judgment on the covenant nation​

Matthew 21:43
“The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.”
This is a transfer of covenant status, not just leadership.

B. The Temple’s destruction is final​

Matthew 24:2
“Not one stone here will be left upon another.”
Jesus does not predict:
  • restoration of sacrifices
  • future covenantal rebuilding
  • renewed land promise
Instead, He relocates covenant presence to Himself.

3. The New Covenant explicitly redefines inheritance

The NT repeatedly teaches that inheritance is no longer geographic.

A. Abraham’s inheritance is universalized​

Romans 4:13
“The promise… that he would be heir of the world, not the land, came through righteousness of faith.”
Paul deliberately expands the promise beyond Palestine.

B. The land becomes typological​

Hebrews 11:9–16
The patriarchs sought “a better country, a heavenly one.”
The physical land was a shadow, not the final reality.

4. 30–70 AD as the covenant transition period​

Your dating is internally consistent with the NT:
  • Jesus inaugurates the New Covenant (~30 AD)
  • Apostolic period = overlap of covenants
  • Jerusalem judged in 70 AD
  • Temple destroyed
  • Sacrificial system ends permanently
Hebrews 8:13
“What is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.”
After 70 AD:
  • no temple
  • no priesthood
  • no sacrifices
  • no covenantal land function
From a biblical standpoint, that closes the land covenant.

5. The NT never restores a land claim to post-Christ Judaism​

This point is decisive.
There is no New Testament text that:
  • reaffirms a future land covenant for Jews as Jews
  • ties salvation or covenant status to Palestine
  • predicts a restored temple under Mosaic law
When the apostles speak of hope, they speak of:
  • resurrection
  • new creation
  • heavenly Jerusalem
  • the Church as God’s people
Galatians 4:26
“The Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.”
That is a direct contrast with earthly Jerusalem.

6. What this does—and does not—mean​

Biblically, it means:​

  • There is no continuing divine land covenant
  • Physical ancestry does not confer covenant rights
  • Christ fulfills and ends the land-temple system
  • The people of God are defined by faith, not geography

Biblically, it does not mean:​

  • Jews should be harmed
  • Jews should be denied civil rights
  • Christians should police land ownership
  • Theology should be enforced politically
The apostles never made covenant theology into civil violence or coercion.

7. A clean, biblically faithful formulation​

Here is the strongest version of your claim that remains strictly biblical:
According to the New Testament, the land promise to Israel was tied to the old covenant and temple system, which Jesus fulfilled and which was judged and ended by 70 AD. Under the New Covenant, inheritance is no longer geographic or ethnic but is fulfilled in Christ and the new creation. Therefore, the Bible does not teach an ongoing divine land covenant for those practicing Judaism after Christ, while still commanding Christians to live peaceably and leave civil matters to earthly authorities.
That statement:
  • aligns with Jesus
  • aligns with Paul
  • aligns with Hebrews
  • avoids unbiblical hostility
  • avoids political absolutism

8. Why this distinction matters​

Every time Christians:
  • turned covenant theology into territorial enforcement
  • confused eschatology with politics
  • treated unbelief as a civil crime
they departed from the New Testament.
The apostles kept theology theological, not coercive.

Young earth vs Old earth?

If one believes in a God inspired universe, then arguing over tinelines (6 days vs 4 billion years) and mechanics (creation vs evolution) is largely academic and misses the real question we should be asking!

The fact remains that regardless of whether the CREATION STORY is literal or symbolic, we exist - the real question that should be our focus of attention is not be HOW WE GOT HERE but WHY ARE WE HERE - WHAT PURPOSE DO WE SERVE!
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

One more post exchange.
I am going off the same article and it clearly says that Pierre Protzen had done tests. Just after his reference is linked it says "Even though their experiments have been able to shed some light on the techniques".
This is not from Protzens own writing. From the source I believe you are using:

"Even though their experiments have been able to shed some light on the techniques that, even with very rudimentary tools, could have been used to craft perfectly planar surfaces, accurate right angles and millimeter wide joints, many aspects of ancient Andean stone cutting and architecture remain unexplained."

They are clearly not talking about any shining surfaces here.

If this is the text you meant to quote, stop being deceptive. You failed to quote a pertinent part.

If you meant some other text please link it.

That clearly implies they had done tests to support their findings. In fact the author was referencing them as support that despite experiements being done by Protzen and Stella Nair questions still remained. He was using Protzen as a credible source. You referred to him as a credible source when you referred to him. Otherwise why refer to him.
Because you referred to him. I asked questions about his view and implicitly why you referenced him.
Upvote 0

Voters Give Democrats In Congress A Record Low Job Approval But Still Might Vote For Them In 2026, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Majority


Interesting poll, Trump too is widely disapproved of.

James Woods emotional response to Trump on Rob Reiner's death

Evidence matters. In Biden's case, he clearly was sharp in 2020 when he completely outclassed Trump in debates, but was not so sharp in 2024. Democrats acted accordingly. When Trump began to show signs of cognitive decline, republicans just doubled down on supporting him. He's clearly having trouble keeping awake, often says things that a bright 6th grader would know are wrong, etc.
You clearly perceive reality very differently to me.
Upvote 0

Is there another '1st World' country, where our darkskin-Black friends get arrested for having mental health crises?

I did no such thing. Quit being deceitful in here.
It's not a problem I have.
So what if I quoted one word, I still referred to your fatuity in that entire statement. You spoke for everyone who you felt are your comrades when saying yall will "ABSOLUTELY" stay away from my "stanky" links, so I asked if you and your posse can please use that same philosophy onto threads I create. Yep. Yall can ABSOLUTELY stay away from those too. :cool:
Now you've forgotten how to reply. Sigh.
I already told you that your word trickery can not work on me.
Words are hard. Someday you will learn how to use them respectfully.
Upvote 0

It's Okay To Ask For Help

YouTube Channel Video Devo
Login to view embedded media
“It’s Okay To Ask For Help”

For the past several weeks, I’ve had something on my heart that I wanted to share with you all as kind of a different devotional. I know that I have shared with you all in the past months about my journey the last couple of years with going to therapy and I wanted to share something on my heart about my experience. Before I started going to therapy, my wife had recommended it to me and I hesitated a lot. I was scared of what I might face or have to bring up from my past. We were also having a lot of challenges in our marriage and I just needed some guidance with things I struggled with in my past.

After much resistance and hesitation, I agreed to go and I am SO VERY thankful that she encouraged me to go. I am nowhere close to where I need to be, but I have come a long way since I began my journey with therapy. It’s been a big God send. The guy I go to is a Christian and it’s so great that we each share our faith journey and our experiences with the Christian walk.

I wanted to encourage all of you, that if you are going through some hard times and you need to get some stuff figured out, please don’t hesitate and seek out a therapist if you are really struggling. I would highly recommend a Christian therapist. If you can’t find a place that practices Christian therapy, then look up someone with a bio that is a Christian and take a crack at it.

Going to a regular therapist isn’t wrong by any means, but I personally believe in having a Christ-centered therapy session. I know some of you out there are really struggling with things in life and there comes a point when you sometimes just need to talk to someone and get things sorted out mentally.

So I’m taking this opportunity this week to encourage you to seriously and prayerfully consider therapy if that’s something you feel you need. Don’t be afraid and give it a try. A lot of people hesitate about going and I did for a long time. But I am so thankful I did and it helps to just talk through things and be encouraged that I’m not crazy.

If you are struggling in life, pray about it and ask God to lead you to someone you can go talk to. It’s ok to ask for help. Yes, even us guys need help sometimes! We all need guidance, whether that’s just a mentor we spend time with or a professional therapist. I just felt like sharing this with you all and my experience and how God has used this to help me with my issues and my faith.

Had Mary guessed about resurrection ?

I believes that through the Sacrifice of her Son, she was preserved from Original Sin. (This is confirmed by many early Church Fathers).

And as a result, she possessed preternatural gifts. So yes, she was well informed of Scripture.
Yet, she also was surprised at 12 years old Jesus' reply, when they find him in the Temple
  • Like
Reactions: David Lamb
Upvote 0

Proposed 'Arc D. Trump' Monument Next to Lincoln Memorial Seen in White House Photos

NETANYAHU TOPPLED

Furious protesters dismantle artist’s 13 foot-high golden statue likening Israeli Prime Minister to dictator Saddam Hussein



1766020883091.png



BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!

A 13 foot golden stature of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu mysteriously appeared overnight in Kings of Israel Square, in Tel Aviv, Israel!

The sculptor, Italy Zalait, christened the statute with the title "KING BIBI" - designed as a satirical replica of statutes erected by dictators around the world!

Ir was also a commentary on a Prime Minister (1996_1999) (2009-2021) (2022-present) who despite an alliance with Israel's ultra right-wing fringe parties received just 23.4% of the popular vote in 2022!

Should he leave the office of Prime Minister,, Netanyahu will find himself facing criminal charges of fraud, breech of trust and accepting bribes = they bring prison terms of 3 and 10 years respectively!



1766028894235.png




The statute was also erected to draw attention to Israel's "culture war" between the government and the nation's artistic community - reminiscent of totalitarian states, the Culture Minister has announced that she will block the funding for art and cultural institutions which do not publicly express their loyalty to the stat

The statute was subsequently toppled by angry spectators - similar to the public response after dictators, past and present, who have removed from power!

Its all just a matter of time that a narcissist with President Trump's ego will demand that statutes be erected to commemorate his "achievements - what are the odds that "KING DONALD" will meet with the same fate as "KING BIBI" and other authoritarian leaders!



1766028992864.png




  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Antinomianism, definition and a Question "is this you"?

Until you read Eph 6:1 where "the first commandment with a promise is Honor your father and mother" in that still valid unit of TEN
And Rom 13, James 2, Matt 19 ...
It is referring to scripture
It is referring to "The Commandments of God" 1 Cor 7:19
Eph 6:1 where "the first commandment with a promise is Honor your father and mother" in that still valid unit of TEN
Ephesians 6:1-2 is not as difficult to read as you have imagined, as it quotes "Honor your father and mother" , being the FIRST commandment in that still binging set of TEN
Well you keep ignoring Eph 6 no matter how often it is referenced.
Sadly you are not following 1 Cor 7 either. In 1 Cor 7 : 19 we see the contrast between moral law such as the "Commandments of God" (where the first commandment with a promise is Honor your father and mother) as compared to ceremonial law (specifically circumcision as stated in the text). The very contrast and compare that your preferences keep wanting to avoid so far.

if you intend to smuggle in the entire 10 because Paul says "the first commandment with a promise" then read all that you need to bring in with in. Ex 20-23 is the context of where the 10 are first introduced, along side a bunch of other commandments directly from God and a blood covenant is formed for them all (not a subset)

1 Cor 7:19 has mirror verses in Gal 5:6 and Gal 6:15. They all have the same meaning, not "in addition to" and it's meaning is not of the 10, it is a unique inward identiy of the NC found in Christ called the "new creation" which is contrasted with a unique outward identiy of the old which is circumsion. These verse contrast the new and the old, a common theme throughout the NT.

Paul never uses this terminology "moral law" and certainly nowhere in the bible references this as the 10 commandments. These are forced into the text, then swirled around with all your other conflated verses to make this SDA soup that allows to affirm the 10. There's too much manipulation of the text for me to see it as responsible. Be more grounded and critically minded when presenting these verses so I can consider your position more seriously.

Sadly here again you simply dig a hole for your own argument since the TEN are THE unit of Law where "honor your father and mother" are THE FIRST COMMANDMENT with a promise. That is not the case in Genesis or any other place where you may wish to look for God's LAW in scripture and the FIRST commandment WITH A promise is "Honor your father and mother".

You don't even come up with a single alternative that meets the criteria,

Are you imagining to yourself that "we just won't notice"??

You need to make an effort to at least appear to be serious
Paul is affirming a specific moral aspect of the 10, reframing it to the NC with the "in the Lord" reference. so it is not a verbatim 5th commandment, but reframed for NC values. We do not get the luxury of a reframed 4th commandment in this passage. The 5th is legal code of the OC, and the penalty was death. Paul does not invoke the legal code. he restestablishes the context as "in the Lord" (hence the reframing). What he does not do is reestablish the legal/moral requirement of keeping the Sabbath (the giant leap you're making). He is also not isolating the 10 as some sort of hierarchy where the 10 operate external to the law (another giant leap you're making). 1-3 are monotheistic claims, 5-10 are moral claims, but the 4 is bit of an oddball and is ritually driven. Contextually (the time of Moses) it still operated as a monotheistic claim to counter pagan practices of the day that were already happening with surrounding cultures, so in this sense the 4th operates as a polemic (as do the entire 10). A polemic that is not universal, as polemics contrast an opposing action and if the opposing action drops out of practice, the polemic's root context and needs to be redefined to have meaning (another reason why the 5th needs to be reframed for it to have continued meaning in the NC). Although the 4th can be practiced freely, its monotheistic claim is abstract and a better when we look to Christ for this model, as it happens, the Sabbath points to Christ by design, so there is nothing random about it. if we are looking to reframe the sabbath in the NC we look to Christ. There is no 4th commandment requirement in the NT, and this is a massive one to leave out. There are scriptures that speak about sabbaths and ritual days that they are not binding to our faith, there are scriptures that tells us that sabbath rest is available to us in this very moment, not a specific day, there are scriptures that tell us the OC is obsolete, there are scriptures that tell us Christ came to fulfill the law but the requirement of the 4 commandments is not there. Sure there is value for obeying your parents, but there is no spoken value for keeping the 4th commandment.
Upvote 0

Didascalia Apostolorum Teaching of the Apostles inspired scripture

Thanks, earlier the only evidence I was finding for claimed apostolic authorship was that it was "framed" in a certain way, which is too vague.
The Wikipedia author plagiarized this word for word from the Catholic Encyclopedia. I don't know off the top of my head if St. Epiphanius wrote anything other than the Panarion, but I'd guess that's the work where he talks about it.
Yeh I don't know why it is not referenced earlier by Eusebius or someone even earlier... I still believe the internal date though. For me to reject internal dates I need a large body of evidence internal or external to do so. For someone to claim with certainty that a text is pseudepigrapha they are claiming to of seen when the text was written, and by whom... they are claiming to have a time machine, and of seen the autographs, and know 100% of the history of the transmission of the manuscript over time. I don't believe anyone can defend that position.
Upvote 0

What is Hanukkah all about? (A history lesson)

A STUDY ON HANUKKAH, WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT? (From the evening of December 14 - ending December 22nd)


“And it was at Jerusalem the Feast of the Dedication (Hanukkah), and it was winter, and Yeshua (Jesus) walked in the temple in Solomon's porch” (John 10:22,23). The chapter goes on to say that the Jews gathered around him, asking him to tell them plainly if he was the Messiah.

Hanukkah was an important festival, important enough for our Messiah to be at the temple and answer questions. The meaning of the word “Hanukkah” is “dedication”. In order to understand this better, we need to go back and read 2 Chronicles 7:8-10. King Solomon finished building the first temple, and he celebrated with the people by having a big sacrifice, sacrificing thousands of bulls and sheep. He invited the people, and they shared in the festivity. He celebrated for 8 days, during the time of Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles), on the 8th day, “Hoshanah Raba,” he blessed the people and sent them home. A lot happened after that time; the priests and much of the people took their eyes off the LORD, and went into idolatry.

Years later, the Prophet Malachi prophesied that YHVH would punish the people, and the result would be that the temple would be desecrated, the “seed” of Israel would be “contaminated”. You can read this in Malachi 1:6; 2:1,2,8,9. The Prophet Daniel was more precise. He had visions of what would happen in the future.

The visions of Daniel in chapter 8 had to do with “two” end-time periods. One, the end time before the first coming of Messiah Yeshua, and the second, the end time before the second coming of Messiah, which is still in the future. In Chapter 8:5, the prophet sees a “he goat” (Greece) and a “ram” (Persia). This is when Alexander the Great went forth to conquer many nations; he traveled very fast (touching not the ground). This happened around 330 B.C. He went from West (Greece) towards the East (nations East of Greece), these nations included Persia, Egypt, Syria, and Israel (Judea).

The prophet mentions the “horn that was broken” (Alexander's death) and from that, 4 other horns came out (four generals took over). (Daniel 8:8). “Ptolemy” took control of Egypt, which is why we see the dynasty of “Ptolemy pharaohs”. Queen Cleopatra was a “Ptolemy”. Seleucid took control over Syria. From Seleucid, came the “little horn that waxed great”. This was the rise of Antiochus (Daniel 8:9). First, there was Antiochus III, and afterward, Antiochus IV (Epiphanes). It was Antiochus Epiphanes who wreaked Havoc in Judea, was a tyrant, a murderer who was satanically controlled. He proclaimed himself “Zeus incarnate,” thus the title “Epiphanes.” An epiphany is a carnal likeness of a god. But what happened to Judea before the rise of Antiochus?

Alexander had introduced “Hellenism” to the conquered world. Judea could either accept the new Greek ways or reject them. Most Israelites rejected them; they stayed Torah observant and worshiped YHVH. Some accepted the new Greek ways, new Greek style clothing, music, philosophy, gymnastics, drama, language, etc... Under Alexander, and even under the first Antiochus (III), Judeans had a choice, either accept or reject; it didn't really matter, but when Antiochus III died, and his son Antiochus IV came to power, all changed.

Everyone had to convert to Hellenism, accept Antiochus as supreme ruler and “god” manifested in human form, or die. No longer could they study Torah; the scrolls were destroyed, and circumcision of males was a capital offense. So life was “hell” for all of Israel that did not convert or accept Hellenism, and accept Antiochus as “Zeus incarnate”.

On the 25th of the Hebrew month of Kislev, 167 B.C, Antiochus invades the temple in Jerusalem and desecrates it. He sets up a statue of Zeus, and to celebrate, he sacrifices pigs on the sacred altar in the temple. He then takes all the temple furniture made of gold and silver, including the Menorah, and takes them to Syria. The temple is now bare, and desecrated, and now dedicated to Zeus and pagan sacrifices. (Daniel 8:11-12).

The next thing that Antiochus did was to replace the Judean “Onias”, the high priest, and put his own brother “Jason” as priest instead of Onias. Jason started promoting “Zeus worship and pig sacrifices” throughout Judea. He went to the city of Modin, where the priest Mattathias lived with his five sons: John, Jonathan, Judah, Simon, and Eleazar. This is where the resistance started.

Jason had sent an officer to offer Mattathias riches and honor, if only he would set the example and offer pig sacrifices to Zeus. The officer was not prepared for the reaction of Mattathias. With a loud voice, he responded;

“Though all the nations that are under the king's dominion obey him and fall away from the religion of their fathers, and give consent to his commandments, yet will I and my sons and my brethren walk in the covenant of our fathers. God forbid that we should forsake the Torah and the ordinances. We will not harken to the king's words to go from our religion, either on the right hand or the left!” (1st Book of Maccabees)

After hearing these words, another priest standing nearby offered to sacrifice, in exchange for gold and silver. When the priest tried to go forward, Mattathias took a sword and slew him there, and also slew the officer in charge. Now, Mattathias and his sons were wanted criminals in the eyes of Antiochus. Mattathias and his sons had to flee the city, and they went into the hills of Judea to hide.

Other faithful Judeans heard what Mattathias had done and went out to be with him and his sons, thus forming a small army. Yet what did they have? Perhaps a few spears, a few knives, pitchforks, and not many swords. Judeans from all classes in society went to join him and his sons. There, out in the wilderness, they prepared for battle. They would strike out against Antiochus and his trained Greek-Syrian forces. They would fight with guerrilla warfare tactics. They knew the terrain; the Greeks didn't.

This reminds us of the Revolutionary War in the United States, when the 13 colonies were under British rule. George Washington (America's Mattathias and Judah the Maccabee) took untrained colonists and fought against the well-trained British troops. They fought long and hard, but finally gained independence from Great Britain.

Antiochus now knew that Mattathias and his small army were serious. Mattathias was old, and he died during this war. He left his eldest son, Judah, to take command. His surname “Maccabee” comes from the Hebrew/Aramaic word “Makabah” which means “Hammer”, so his whole name in Hebrew “Y'hudah Makavi” is telling us “My God YAH is my hammer”. With the strength and blessings of God, Y'hudah and his army went forth to fight against Antiochus and his armies.

Antiochus sent out four generals: Apollonius, Georgias, Seron, and Nicanor. The strength of these armies was probably 100,000 or more. Yet Judah fought them all (guerrilla style strike and run, strike and hide, ambush, etc...) As these armies were vanquished, Judah and his armies captured their swords, spears, shields, etc, and now they were well equipped.

Needless to say, Judah pushed forward and finally drove the Greek-Syrians out of Judea. He and his army retook Jerusalem. The temple was in shambles, the altar desecrated with swine blood and guts, and the Temple emptied of its treasures. Judah and his men got to work; they tore down the pagan altar and built an altar to YHVH. He went and “brought in new vessels, the candlestick (Menorah), the table of Shewbread, and the altar of incense, which were made of gold” (Josephus, the complete works, pg. 393).


Another question is, where did they “bring in new vessels from?” Did they have them made? Did Judah send a detachment or a regiment of soldiers to Antioch to recapture the temple furniture and bring them back to Jerusalem? We know that Antioch was the headquarters of Antiochus, and he probably took the golden temple furniture to Antioch. That is a possibility.

Judah and his men went to work and made the temple like new again, re-lit the menorah, and made a “feast of dedication” for 8 days, just like in the days of Solomon, when he dedicated the first temple for eight days. Judah offered sacrifices on the newly built brazen altar just like Solomon did. This also happened on the same day, 25th of Kislev, 164 B.C., three years after it had been desecrated. This year, the 25th of Kislev was Monday, December 15th.

Some believe that there was just one clay flask or jar of oil left in the temple. The belief is that this flask of oil was only enough for one day of light, but it lasted for eight days. The problem with this is that it was never written down in history that it actually happened. The Jewish historian, Josephus, never mentioned it. Now, could it have happened? Sure, anything is possible. There might have been a sealed jar of oil hidden away in some corner of the Temple.

Today, we still celebrate this time of year. Many people have a special 9-branched menorah called a “Hanukkiah”. This is used especially for this time. The middle branch is called the “Shamash” (the helper) from this middle branch, which holds and candle or oil with a wick; the other candles are lit each night for 8 nights. As Messianic Jewish believers, we see the symbolism in the middle branch as “Yeshua,” who is the “Light of the World,” and we are the “little lights”; we get our light from Messiah Yeshua. He even said, “Ye are the light of the world. (Matt 5:14-16)

One way we can look at the 9 branches of the Hanukkiah is in the following manner: We can see 9 aspects of the faith; “Teshuvah” (repentance), “Tzedakah” (charity and giving), “Mitzvot” (good works), “Emunah” (faith),“Yeshua” (Salvation) “Mishpochah” (family) “Ahavah” (love) “HaTorah” (God's Word) “Israel” (the Holy Land) are all inter-related. And we can also add “Chen” (faith) because by “faith” we are saved, not of works, lest any man should boast.

Many also “spin the dreidel,” which is a four-sided top, with the letters N, G, H, S, (but in Hebrew), which symbolize, “Nez, Gadol, Haya, Sham” (A great miracle happened there). What was the miracle? That a small army of about 10,000 men fought against a superior army of 100,000 or more, yet not through the might of swords and spears, but through the might and power of YHVH, they won and achieved victory.

These 4 letters, when added up in gematria, = 358; the word “Mashiach” (Messiah) also adds up to the sum of 358. Mashiach gave the victory. He also gives us the victory in our lives against sin. We can think of “Dedication” at this time of year to re-dedicate our lives to Messiah Yeshua, to serve him, and keep on serving him, and to be “lights” in dark places. Our work and service in Messiah Yeshua ends on earth when we are called home, and even in heaven, we will continue to serve and see His LIGHT forever.

Another name for Hanukkah is the "Festival of Lights" (Hag HaUrim) It is also believed that around the time of Hanukkah, Mary became pregnant with our Messiah Yeshua, and carried within her the "Light of the World" and gave birth, perhaps towards the end of September or early October. (during the Feast of Tabernacles)

Families celebrate Hanukkah in different forms. They get together, as many people get together during the Christmas season, they share their love, make potato latkes (fried potatoes with flour and egg mixture), play games (with the dreidel), give small gifts, many times food gifts; packets or boxes of imported teas or coffees, chocolates,

The most important is lighting the special “Hanukkiah.” They come in all sizes and forms, some traditional, others abstract. One creative way of having the “9-lights” is purchasing 8 small jars of fragrance candles in glass jars and 1 large jar. different fragrance spices, like pumpkin spice, vanilla, almond butter, etc. These are 3 inches tall by 2 inches wide. Then the middle jar is larger, it measures 5 ½ inches tall by 3 inches wide (around). The middle jar is lit as the “Shamash,” the Helper. And each night, the jars on each side are lit.

The first night is the shamash and the end jar-candle, the second night, the middle jar-candle and two more, etc. This creates the lights of Hanukkah and a lovely fragrance in the living room. Some people use an electric menorah in the window.

The last point I would like to share is that the word “Hanukkah” means “dedication”. It comes from the Hebrew letters which are “Chet”, “Nun”, and “Kaf”. In English, we would see “Ch”, “n”, and “k.”

The base word in Hebrew is “Chanakh,” which has the meaning of “to initiate, discipline, dedicate, train up, and habituate. From this verb comes the noun “Hanukkah” In the ancient Hebrew symbolism, the Paleo-Hebrew letters symbolize “The fence gives an anointed life” or “The fence of life that brings anointing” The “Fence” being the Torah and the “Living Torah” which is Yeshua, They “surround” us and give us protection from the ways of the world.

How do we apply “Chanakh” and “Hanukkah” in our lives today? Since the temple in Jerusalem is no more, our own bodies are now the “Temple of the Holy Spirit”. At this time of year, we might look inwardly and re-dedicate ourselves to the LORD, by discipling ourselves in Torah study, doing Mitzvoth (good works), training up others to study and understand God’s Word, and putting it into action. Make Torah study a “habit” (habituate) every day in our lives.

We shouldn’t have to wait for Hanukkah to re-dedicate our lives to Adonai; we should do this every waking morning of every day, but this is the time we should really look at our lives with a fine-tooth comb, because the enemy “HaSatan” is the Antiochus who wants to see us defeated, yet Yeshua has won the war. Baruch HaShem!!

HAPPY 8 DAYS AND NIGHTS OF HANUKKAH.



Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,940
Messages
65,440,532
Members
276,453
Latest member
iHarken