• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

University of Minnesota on Whiteness Pandemic

Uhm.
Yes you should.
If you want to make claims about something, you better look at it.


LOL!

How is THAT a though?

"I shouldn't have to read what I'm complaining about!"
Of course, you're defending something you haven't read, so what does that say?
Upvote 0

Trump Says US Will Permanently Pause Migration From 'Third World Countries'

What's changed more recently is the nationalist anti-immigration tack. Foreigners coming to our shores (legally) were, once upon a time, "future Americans". Reagan spoke of America as a "beacon of hope". Now the light's been snuffed out.
Seems they've changed it to a "spotlight of fear" instead.
Upvote 0

University of Minnesota on Whiteness Pandemic

I shouldn't have to pour over the original manuscripts just to see where opposing viewpoints are analyzed. I
Uhm.
Yes you should.
If you want to make claims about something, you better look at it.


LOL!

How is THAT a though?

"I shouldn't have to read what I'm complaining about!"
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Grifts around 47: A running catelogue for this presidency

Know your customers.

Trump team caught marking up MAGA merch while touting Black Friday 'deals'

The campaign's Black Friday fundraising email hawks multiple items that appear to contain higher prices than what's listed on its website, according to Meidas Touch.
  • Informative
Reactions: Paulos23
Upvote 0

Are there still Apostles today?

Because historically, in connection to Christ and the Apostles, they're not in the same relation to Christ and we have no guarantee that they were indeed called by the Holy Spirit simply because some other church leaders 'think' that Joe Schmoe should be a leader.
So I guess you then reject John's appointment of Polycarp as Bishop of Smyrna.

To be ignorant of history is a huge handicap.
Upvote 0

$15 Billion And Climbing: Trump’s Tariffs Deliver Record High Revenue

Presenting facts is unlikely to change their minds. Many MAGA supporters who now favor tariffs previously voted for Reagan and his support of free market capitalism; they supported W. Bush and his free trade policies; they voted for John McCain’s deregulation and open market stance, as well as Mitt Romney’s “idea of capitalism. Suddenly, these same voters who once championed free market and free trade principles are now advocating for imposing tariffs.

Either these individuals did not believe in what they supported during the first forty years of their lives, or they do not genuinely support their current choices; however, as long as their vote opposes liberals, they remain committed.
Those facts were from his cite. ^_^ But yeah, some people will consider the facts and accept them in time while others will just double down.
Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

The Just vs the Wicked

wicked: evil or morally wrong.
just: based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair.
According to which law?
✅ Wickedness
  • Evidenced by mingling with the daughters of men with the sons of God (Genesis 6:5).
  • The wickedness before the flood (Genesis 6:11-13).
  • The men of Sodom were called "wicked" and "sinners before the Lord exceedingly" (Genesis 13:13, Jude 1:7). If the men of Sodom were sinners then by what standard if not the Ten?
According to which law?
✅ Righteousness
  • Abel before he was murdered by his brother (Genesis 4:4).
  • The sons of God before they started mingling with the daughters of men (Genesis 6:5).
  • Enoch walked with God and pleased God (Genesis 5:24, Hebrews 11:5).
  • Noah was a just man, perfect, and walked with God (Genesis 6:9).
According to which law?
✅ The Wages of Sin/Death
  • The wages of sin is death (1 John 3:4).
  • Adam and Eve understood that death was a consequence of sin before the fall (Genesis 2:17).
  • Cain understood the consequences of murder before he murdered (Genesis 4:7).
Adam and Eve were given a command. They broke the command so sin entered the world. Which law did Adam and Eve follow afterwards? Which law told Cain that he did wrong?
The Ten

All Ten commandments are shown in scripture pre-Sinai. I'll list six of the Ten.

✅ Having Other Gods and Graven Images
  • Foreign gods that Jacob removed from his house (Genesis 35:2-4).
  • Laban's idols (Genesis 31:19, 30, 34).
  • Pre-flood and post-flood idolatry (Joshua 24:14).
Gen. 30, 31, 34, and 35 is Noahic law. Joshua uses the Mosaic law given at the time of Moses.
✅ Taking the Lord's Name in Vain
  • Cain's offering to God had no respect (Genesis 4:5-7).
Nope. You are making that up. Wrong interpretation.
✅ The Sabbath
  • The Sabbath was sanctified at creation (Genesis 2:1-3).
Which no one knew until Moses wrote Genesis.
  • The Sabbath was made for man at creation (Mark 2:27). Therefore, observance of the Sabbath started at creation.
Again, no law about the Sabbath until Moses.
  • It is because of the Sabbath being made for man that the Son of man is also Lord of the Sabbath (Mark 2:28).
Nope. Jesus is the Lord of the sabbath because He is now our rest.
  • The Sabbath is observed in the new heaven and the new earth (Isaiah 66:22-23), showing its perpetuity.
From sabbath to sabbath is a common expression denoting seven days (a week).
  • The breaking the Sabbath (Exodus 16:27–28).
Part of the Mosaic law and not applicable to Christians.
✅ Murder
  • Satan was a murderer from the beginning (John 8:44).
Yep.
  • As @BobRyan pointed out, Cain was cautioned against sin (Genesis 4:7). How can Cain know sin if there is no law? He can't. What sin was God cautioning him against? Murder.
Which law?
  • Cain murdered Abel, which was clearly against God (Genesis 4:8).
Which law?
  • Lamech murdered a man (Genesis 4:23).
Which law?
  • Violence before the flood (Genesis 6:11-13).
Which law?
  • Esau had planned to murder Jacob (Genesis 27:41).
Noahic law.
✅ Bearing False Witness
  • Lucifer accused God before the holy angels, evidenced in the fact that he caused a third of the angels to be cast out of heaven along with him (Revelation 12:4).
Yep. Nothing new here.
  • Lucifer deceived Adam and Eve with a lie (Genesis 3:4).
Yep. Nothing new here.
  • Satan's accusations of the brethren before God; lies (Job 1:9, Jude 1:9, Revelation 12:10).
Which law?
  • Satan is the father of lies (John 8:44).
Yep. Nothing new here.
  • Jacob deceiving his father into thinking he was Esau (Genesis 27:19).
Noahic law.
Conclusion
  • Scripture points to the Ten specifically concerning sin, whether it be pre-flood, pre-Sinai or post-Sinai.
It does not. You have to wretch scripture totally out of context cover your theory but you still can not give me a verse that shows the Mosaic law including the Ten Commandments bring given to anyone prior to Moses. You also can not give me a verse that shows anyone observing the sabbath commandment prior to Moses.
  • Sin has always been transgression of the law of God (lawlessness), as defined by the Ten.
Which law was given prior to Moses and to whom?
Upvote 0

Nuns Escape Nursing Home To Return To Alpine Convent

Rebel nuns win reprieve in Austrian convent dispute

Three nuns in their 80s who made headlines after fleeing their care home to take back their convent in Austria are being allowed to stay there "until further notice", church officials said Friday.

The story of runaway sisters Rita, 82, Regina, 86, and Bernadette, 88, defying the church hierarchy made headlines across the globe.

Rebel rebel, how could they know?
Three nuns, I love you so!
Upvote 0

Long Slow Journey

1764433252794.png


A Long Slow Journey

Tenderness has the power to melt the most hardened hearts steeped in pride. As we receive God’s love in our hearts, our identity as His beloved sons and daughters is restored. The tenderness of God heals. The caress of God disinfects and cleanses our wounds. The tenderness of God brings peace, serenity, and rest to the

The Love Crucified Community. The Simple Path to Union with God (pp. 279-280). Kindle Edition.

++++++++++

It has been a long journey learning to trust in God. Many of our deepest wounds are formed in childhood, hidden in memory yet still shaping our lives in ways we may not see. What others notice in us can remain invisible to ourselves.

In my youth, I had no words for my inner struggles. This led to seasons of chaos, much of which I managed to conceal—though not all. One day, while reading from the First Letter of John (3:20): “If our hearts condemn us, we know that God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything,” the words pierced me. I fell to my knees in tears, realizing that my lack of self-love had blocked my growth in self-knowledge. That moment began the slow process of trusting in God’s love for me.

The inner journey requires persistence. Setbacks, failures, even great sins must not keep us down. I have learned to rise again and again, for failure is often part of the path to faith. I am a slow learner, but perhaps that is why I welcome old age—it has brought me a deeper, though still limited, understanding of God’s love for me and for all. We must remember: we are made in His image and likeness; He is not made in ours.

—Br. MD

University of Minnesota on Whiteness Pandemic

I'm not convinced you have a good grasp on what academic research looks like.

If you haven't ACTUALLY read, or at LEAST laid your eyes on the original study and have no idea what's in it, wouldn't that make all your critique of the ACTUAL work moot.
I shouldn't have to pour over the original manuscripts just to see where opposing viewpoints are analyzed. In any serious research, these things are always well documented and made available...

When they aren't made available, you know you're looking at psuedoscience, or worse - political/ideological activism disguised as academics.
Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

Even after this wall of text you still can’t tell me what commandments, what statutes, and what laws.

Actually God did, as it has been shown to "Every Creature under heaven", (According to Paul) and it is written down as God Himself inspired, in the Oracles of God that HE has provided for you, in His Mercy and Loving kindness, directly into your own home even now. And Paul said there is no excuse for you or me or Cain or Sodom, " Because that "which may be known of God" is manifest in us; for God hath shewed it unto us." Just as HE showed it to them.

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; 5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; 6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly; 7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: 8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their "unlawful" deeds;)

The deceiver would have us believe in the ridiculous and foolish philosophy that "Godliness" in Noah's Time was different than "Godliness" in Moses time. That "Unlawful deeds" in Abraham's Time was different than "Unlawful Deeds" in Moses time.

That somehow Noah was a preacher of Righteousness that didn't include God's Righteousness that the Pharisees refused to submit to..

This is a popular religious philosophy promoted by "many" who call Jesus Lord, Lord. And you can also find this teaching on the internet which some believe is inspired by the Holy Spirit of God. I personally don't believe the Spirit of God dwells in man made machines, but you are free to believe so if you wish, we all have the free will to choose who to believe.

But even a child can see that Abraham was given God's commandments, Statutes, Judgments and Laws, according to what is written. So these can not have been added 430 years after Abraham. But a Priesthood Covenant with Levi, to provide for forgiveness of transgressions "of God's Laws, statute and Judgments", Till the High Priest of God "To whom the promise was made" should come, was most certainly "ADDED" after Abraham given Levi wasn't even born in Abraham's time.

Why did you completely ignore or refuse to even acknowledge this Added "LAW"? Is it because your computer doesn't teach you to live by Every word of God??


As I stated before there are the Nohaic laws and Abraham’s covenant. The Nohaic laws include “some” of the commandments that God would later codify into the tablets of stone and the Mosaic law.

First, can you show me a Commandment of God given to Noah before the Ark, that took 120 years to build, was being loaded? You said there were "Noahic Laws" that were later codified by God through Moses. What are the "Laws of Noah" you claim God commanded, and when does God give Noah these Commandments?

Therefore these are the commandments, statutes, and laws that Abraham followed. Notice that there is no sabbath keeping commandment.

There was no commandment enumerated that said "The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness."

And yet it is written;

Gen. 9: 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness.

So where is this "LAW of Noah", Commanded by God and later codified by God through Moses?


The seven Noahide laws (from AI):
  • Do not worship false gods: Acknowledge and worship only one God.
  • Do not curse God: Respect the Creator and do not curse the divine name.
  • Do not murder: Respect the sanctity of human life.
  • Do not engage in illicit sexual acts: This includes prohibitions against adultery and incest.
  • Do not steal: Respect the property rights of others and be honest in business dealings.
  • Do not eat flesh from a living animal: This prohibits the consumption of meat from a live animal.
  • Establish courts of justice: Create and maintain a system of courts to ensure justice and law obedience.

There was also the Abrahamic covenant.

Can you show me where God enumerated these Laws to Noah? Or rather, can your computer post where these "7 Commandments" of the "Laws of Noah" were codified into Law during Noah's Time?

It's interesting how Abraham, Moses, the Prophets, Jesus, nor any of the Apostles of Christ made even ONE Mention, anywhere in the entire Bible, about the "Laws of Noah".

Yet you claim your computer does.

What if Paul is actually speaking the truth about God's Laws, being blessed with the Spirit of God, and it's your computer that is leading you astray?

Certainly something to consider.
Upvote 0

Are there still Apostles today?

Eph 4:11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers,​
NOTE: all five were given by Jesus to the church - what is the purpose for all five?
12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ,​
Do we still need to be equipped for the work of the ministry, does the Body of Christ still need to be edified?
How long are they supposed to be in the chruch?​
13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ;​
Upvote 0

Trump Says US Will Permanently Pause Migration From 'Third World Countries'

How come the "healthy balance" for Conservative Christians 10 years ago was "we should be helping the poor"
I'm afraid you'd have to go back a lot further than that, probably pre-Reagan, for US conservative Christians to support welfare and other means of helping the poor.

What's changed more recently is the nationalist anti-immigration tack. Foreigners coming to our shores (legally) were, once upon a time, "future Americans". Reagan spoke of America as a "beacon of hope". Now the light's been snuffed out.
Upvote 0

Are there still Apostles today?

Sure he was. That's the point that Luke was making in Acts. Paul himself attests to it as well. So, get that straight into your head.
I do have it right in my head - go back and re-read what I was responding to.

21 Therefore it is necessary to choose one of the men who have been with us the whole time the Lord Jesus was living among us,​
Was Paul with them the whole time the Lord was living?

22 beginning from John’s baptism to the time when Jesus was taken up from us.​
Was Paul with them from John's baptism to the time when Jesus was taken up from them?

For one of these must become a witness with us of his resurrection.” Acts 1:21-22​
Was Paul a witness with the Disciples to His Resurrection?
Upvote 0

University of Minnesota on Whiteness Pandemic

Because there is no evidence that opposing viewpoints have ever been considered in any presentations of the theory, until after the concept was made public - by opposition groups. If the concept were balanced and forthcoming, analysis of opposing views would be documented alongside the findings, somewhere, and would be visible on the internet.
I'm not convinced you have a good grasp on what academic research looks like.

If you haven't ACTUALLY read, or at LEAST laid your eyes on the original study and have no idea what's in it, wouldn't that make all your critique of the ACTUAL work moot.
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Swatting Trolls v. Encouraging Saints—Who Wins When Threads Go Sideways?

We’ve all seen it: you ask for testimonies of grace and within five posts someone’s waving Psalm 137:9 or Hitler to prove a point.
The food-fight starts, the original question sinks, and the encouragers log off.
  • Do we engage the detour in hopes of gospel witness, or gracefully bow out and let the algorithm bury the mess?
  • Any practical filters you use before hitting “reply”?
Share one sentence rule you follow when the trolls arrive.
Grace,
bob121 – Tokyo
I think it depends what the issue is. I assume you are talking about social and ethical issues mostly. Though just about everything can have a social and moral component.

I think the first thing is to recognise the overall culture in which this is happening. It is a different world to the one 50 or 75 years ago. Overall we are a postmodern society. That means the fundemental belief is all things are relative or at least there is an increased inclination to question everything. Oppose stuff for the sake of doing so because its what we do.

So already its a mindfield of decades of post Enlightened rationalisations and people are very good at posing alternatives and articulating arguements. Rightly so as within some contextes they are sound and rational and needed.

Taking this into consideration the first thing to note is that playing the same game by the same rules is not going to work. You more or less become another voice in a pot of voices all proclaiming a subjective truth. So you have to know when its a subjective matter or a factual matter or a bit of both and when to adapt or cease to engage.

I think apologetics is important. But basically I think its a spiritual battle. Most will not even believe such a thing so you cannot get into a rational debate. But we can say that what is being objected to or claimed within the social and moral or political realm is subjective. It is a belief no different to religious belief.

I mean for Christians there are certain core truths and we should be united in mind and spirit. So no need to arguements or decending into politics. Otherwise its not good fruit. Some arguements on the bible are not worth it if they cause division. Just leave it that people believe different and let God show the way.

But in the end all you can do is profess your belief, give testimony of the gospel and leave it at that. People underestimate testimony and we don't have to apologise for it. We use testimonial experience all the time and people believe people.

In saying that I think its by living the gospel or the teachings that will show others that this is not just about words or rationalisations. But a experiential belief that becomes reality. It has a real effect and presense in the world. Thats the evidence and its tangible in that sense. No one can argue about someone who is living the words without fault.

Often it is not what someone said but how they said it or what they actually did that later won the person over. We know that despite all the apologetics that it may be something completely unrelated that caused a person to hear Gods voice.

You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. But you can show them the life giving water and leave it up to God.
Upvote 0

Are there still Apostles today?

The stated requirements for being an apostle are:

21 Therefore it is necessary to choose one of the men who have been with us the whole time the Lord Jesus was living among us, 22 beginning from John’s baptism to the time when Jesus was taken up from us. For one of these must become a witness with us of his resurrection.” Acts 1:21-22

And of course the apostle had to be appointed by the apostles who were appointed by Jesus.
Yes - that adequately describes "The Apostles of the Lamb" mentioned in Revelation

Rev 21:14 Now the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

Which would be similar to the church being built on the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets - note: same terminology (foundation)

But we have to fit in the fact that Barnabas was also designated as an 'apostle,' and there's no indication that Barnabas was similar to Matthias in having been in the original entourage directly surrounding Jesus.
Neither was Paul.
Upvote 0

Trump Says US Will Permanently Pause Migration From 'Third World Countries'

Moderation in all things, my friend. Excessive empathy results in neglecting other responsibilities, and eventually depression.

...The trouble is in finding a healthy balance.
How come the "healthy balance" for Conservative Christians 10 years ago was "we should be helping the poor" and now it's "sometimes we should be helping the poor not usually not"?

Sodom experienced collective consequence for doing stuff like that.
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Trump Says US Will Permanently Pause Migration From 'Third World Countries'

This goes hand in hand with the recent attacks on empathy in certain corners of American Christianity.
I wonder how this poisoning of the term empathy came about? It seems like a new idea, to put boundaries on compassion and empathy.

Part of the challenges of faith are the exact thing they are complaining about it. It's hard to be a christian because being empathetic is hard. But the solution seems to be to change the expectation instead of work toward greatness.
Upvote 0

The bible isn't against LGBT

People often lift these verses out of their context. Romans 1 isn’t describing loving same-sex relationships—it’s Paul talking about people in the ancient world who rejected God and engaged in exploitative, idolatrous practices. The “unnatural” acts he mentions were part of pagan temple rituals, power-imbalanced relationships, and excessive behavior tied to idol worship. Paul’s point is about idolatry and excess, not about consensual, loving LGBT relationships.
Again, nothing here about these verses not meaning what the plain, literal reading depicts. Let me remind you that God created humans as male snd female.

“And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭19‬:‭4‬-‭5‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬



As for Matthew 19, Jesus is answering a specific question about divorce, not laying out every valid form of relationship that could ever exist. He refers to Adam and Eve because that’s the story his audience shared, not to exclude anyone. Quoting this passage to deny LGBT people dignity is reading something into the text that simply isn’t there.
Too bad that is actually quoting from Genesis. So your theory does not work.

“He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them “mankind” on the day when they were created.”
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭5‬:‭2‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
In short: these verses address idolatry, exploitation, and divorce—not modern LGBT identities or loving same-sex relationships.
Nope.
Also, what reason would God have for hating LGBT people? Some people feel happy in relationships and it helps them in life. So why would God be against something that is good for those people?
God loves the people but hates the sin. Homosexuality is sin. Do remember that they can repent from their sin and be forgiven.
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

A top Republican senator, Roger Wicker, has joined his Democratic counterpart in calling for "vigorous oversight to determine the facts" of allegations that the military intentionally killed survivors of a boat strike.

"The Committee has directed inquiries to the Department, and we will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances," said Sen. Wicker, R-Miss., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

In a post on X on Friday, Hegseth said the strikes were intended to be "lethal, kinetic strikes."

"Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict—and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command," Hegseth said.
  • Informative
Reactions: JosephZ
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,882
Messages
65,425,974
Members
276,407
Latest member
HTL_Dan