• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

ARE ALL THE 10 COMMANDMENTS IN THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENT?

This is certainly true. If you don't believe the Gospel that Jesus and Paul brought, was first given to Israel, as Scriptures teach, then there is no real way for a productive conversation.
Glad we agree.
First, there is no "Jewish covenant", there are God's Covenants. "Faith" means "unconditional belief in God shown by works". This was true of Abraham, Caleb, Shadrack, David, Zacharias, Simeon, Cornelius and every example of Faithful man in the Bible.
First problem.

“For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about; but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” Now to the one who works, the wages are not credited as a favor, but as what is due. But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭4‬:‭2‬-‭5‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

No works are necessary for faith. Abraham was not justified by works. In fact, works in general are not necessary but the faith is what is credited as righteousness.
There was a Priesthood covenant that God gave Levi as a Mercy to Israel after the golden Calf, a Law that Abraham didn't have. But there was no "Jewish Covenant", at least not in the Holy Scriptures. You are free to provide me with such a covenant that Jews made, but your source would be outside of the Holy Scriptures.
The old covenant of laws were given to Moses to give to Israel. I have heard them call the Jewish covenant or the laws of Moses. No big mystery here.
Israel, according to God, were Gentiles in Egypt before God sent Moses to bring them out of sin. (Egypt)
I would not use the title of gentile since the Israelites were the descendants of Jacob which was a descendant of Isaac which was a descendant of Abraham. The knew of God so their religious beliefs were not pagan like the Egyptians.
And any "Stranger/gentile" that chose to join themselves to their God, were also considered Israelites. No different that the servants of Abraham. And yes, "unconditional belief in God, shown by works, has always been a requirement of repentance.
Agree except for the works part. As the scripture states salvation is by faith not works. The law was impossible to follow perfectly which led to Christ.
It seems, given the warnings of Jesus and the Prophets and Paul, concerning men who "profess to know God, or that call Jesus Lord, Lord, or that "Come in Christ's Name", that a man shouldn't just accept popular religious philosophy taught by the promoters of this world's religious system.
Learning doctrine, even that preached by the different denominations, does require discernment but the scriptures exhorts the Christian to belong to the body of Christ.
Instead, for me, these warnings mean that I should go to God's Word to find out what HIS New covenant actually is. You can read it for yourself. I believe it is true that the New Covenant, was the change in the Priesthood, as it is written. That we are still required to "Yield ourselves" to God, and become "servants to His Righteousness" as Paul teaches, but no longer engage in the Jews version of the sacrificial "works of the Law" that the Jews religion, who didn't believe God, Moses or His Son, were promoting.
I’m not sure if I am understanding you correctly here. While I agree with you that by the time Jesus came to earth the Jewish version of the old covenant had become quite corrupted. As Jesus stated He did not come for the sake of their traditions. However, even in its purest form, Jesus fulfilled the law and was the only man that was able to keep it perfectly. This covenant remain only for the Jews that did not or have no faith in the redemptive sacrifice of Christ. The promises that God made to Israel remain in effect until God fulfills them at the end of the time of the gentiles and not before.
You are omitting the first thing Paul teaches both Jew and gentile, at least according to the Scriptures.

The promoters of the "Jews Religion" that rejected God's Commandments and Judgments and persecuted God's Church, accused Paul of teaching against God's Laws, as also promoted by "many" who call Jesus Lord, Lord in the world God placed me in. Here is what Paul told them;

Acts 24: 13 Neither can they prove the things "whereof they now accuse me". 14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way "which they call heresy", so worship I the God of my fathers, believing "all things" which are written in the law and in the prophets:

And of course he does, this is where the Gospel of Christ can be found.
Paul doesn’t agree with you. Here is what Paul says that the gospel is:

“Now I make known to you, brothers and sisters, the gospel which I preached to you, which you also received, in which you also stand, by which you also are saved, if you hold firmly to the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain. For I handed down to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. After that He appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep; then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles; and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭15‬:‭1‬-‭8‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Secondly, Paul, of course, worships the same God of Israel but just believing in the law does not mean that he followed them. Here are Paul’s words on the matter.

“Therefore there is now no condemnation at all for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭8‬:‭1‬-‭4‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

The Christian walks in the Spirit and are not bound by the law. So it would be quite inconsistent that in one place Paul stated that he follows the law and then in another teach that the law is weak and not necessary for salvation.
It is a deceitful practice to cherry pick Scriptures for the purpose of defending, justifying and promoting a philosophy that cannot stand, if every Word of God is considered.
This is correct.
That is the philosophy of your adopted religion.
Now we are getting personal and not remaining civil.
The Bible teaches that the Gospel of Christ was given to Israel. And certainly Zacharias and Simeon and Anna are proof of this teaching.

Is. 48: 17 Thus saith the LORD, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am the LORD thy God which teacheth thee to profit, which leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go. 18 O that thou hadst hearkened "to my commandments"! then had thy peace been as a river, and thy righteousness as the waves of the sea:

What if all these Scriptures are right, and the religious philosophies of this world that you have adopted and are now promoting, is the deception?

Shouldn't a man believe what is actually written?
It is in fact quite deceitful to assign context without understanding what is being taught.
Isaiah 48 brings the prophesy of the redeemer not the gospel of good news. In fact, Jesus is telling them that He will come because Israel has been a rebel from birth. They have never been able to keep God’s commandments perfectly. They have profaned His name. The gospel was not given to them but will be given by the redeemer in the future.

““You have not heard, you have not known. Even from long ago your ear has not been open, Because I knew that you would deal very treacherously; And you have been called a rebel from birth. “For the sake of My name I delay My wrath, And for My praise I restrain it for you, In order not to cut you off. “Behold, I have refined you, but not as silver; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction. “For My own sake, for My own sake, I will act; For how can My name be profaned? And I will not give My glory to another.”
‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭48‬:‭8‬-‭11‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Those "Christians" in Matt. 7:22,23, certainly promoted a gospel, and believed in was of Christ.
They were false prophets (Matt 7:15). They did not promote the gospel but were “sheep in wolf clothing”. There are many people now that claim faith in Christ and even do works in His name that have evil in their hearts. This is nothing new. In fact read the parable of the soils which teaches the different levels of faith.
Perhaps you might consider the Scriptures shown to you, and the questions posed at you, so you can become a "Doer" of the Christ's Sayings, not just a word here, and another word over there, but "Every Word" that proceeds out of His Mouth, given they were given to Him by the God and Father of all.
I will exhort you that learn the gospel if good news and be saved by the grace of God through faith not by works (Eph 2:8-10). Now read Paul’s words that follows:

“Therefore remember that previously you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “Uncircumcision” by the so-called “Circumcision” which is performed in the flesh by human hands— remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the people of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who previously were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in His flesh the hostility, which is the Law composed of commandments expressed in ordinances, so that in Himself He might make the two one new person, in this way establishing peace; and that He might reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, by it having put to death the hostility.”
‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭2‬:‭11‬-‭16‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Christians are not part of the old covenant. Christians are not Israel. Christian are not under the law. No one has even been justified by the law and no one will ever be justified by the law.
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

If morality is entirely determined by society, then reformers (e.g., abolitionists, civil rights leaders) would always be “immoral,” since they opposed prevailing norms.
Morality is subjective, so it's entirely normal for some parts of a society to disagree with the moral positions of another. The ones with the best arguments generally win. Else might becomes right.
Different societies hold radically different moral codes (e.g., one condemns slavery, another permits it). If both are “objectively right” because society says so, then contradictory moral systems are equally valid. But that undermines the idea of objective morality, which by definition should hold true universally.
That's why I put 'objective' in quotes. It's actually, and obviously - as you pointed out, relative. Which position is valid is again your decision to make.
Upvote 0

Has Kirk's Death Prompted You?

We need a leader, not a vindictive president who throws fuel on the fire.
So, you would rather leaders who allow the murder of babies in?
As Christians, we should all be standing strongly against such things. "Throwing fuel on the fire" is very minor compared to the millions being slaughtered. I would rather vote for a bad president who throws fuel on the fire than one who permits the murder of babies.
"Therefore, to him who knows to do good and does not do it, to him it is sin." We know that we should not allow murderers to rule the country. To vote for them would be wrong.
I would have thought that, as Christians, we would be strongly against supporting such people.
Upvote 0

Democrats shut down government

Login to view embedded media
Disgusting. How do Democrats defend this?
She's a liar.

Upvote 0

Israel is losing Americans (support)

Yes, the IDF is responsible for the current situation in Gaza, including starvation, fatalities, and humanitarian concerns, as these outcomes are directly linked to the conflict between Hamas and Israel. However, questions remain regarding whether the Israeli government has viable alternatives to military retaliation. This reflects the broader realities of warfare, where innocent civilians often bear significant consequences.
As evidenced by what exactly in Israel? To call this war suggests that there is, infact, conflict. There's no conflict. Hamas can do virtually nothing. They hurt basically nobody. This is just a slaughter.
Since Nov. of 2023 54 Israelis have been killed.


Israeli government has a duty to protect its citizens, even if that requires engaging in war with another country.

The Israeli government cannot permit a foreign nation or group to launch rockets at its cities repeatedly. Since 2005, more than 20,000 rockets have been fired toward Israel by Hamas. The Israeli government considers it necessary to respond to such attacks, even if these actions result in significant impacts on other regions and populations.
I would suggest that, while 20,000 seems like a terrifying number (and while I personally would rather not want ANY attacks), it could be argued that their impact has been nominal. For instance, I am VERY curious how many of those rocket attacks were actually ANY kind of successful.
By way of example, from 2005-2007 there were about 2700 attacks that led to 4 Isarel deaths.
Shall we compare how many Gazans died due to IDF actions during that time?


In 2005, the Israeli government engaged in negotiations with Hamas and the United States to refrain from entering Gaza and to allow the establishment of a local government. Between 2006 and 2022, during this period, Hamas governed its people, constructed tunnels beneath hospitals, and launched over 20,000 rockets.

During this period, Palestinians lived in poverty and faced food shortages, while international aid continued to be sent to the region. Majority of the aid was used by Hamas for military actions against Israel, rather than being allocated toward humanitarian needs.
Do you have a NONIsraeli based source to support that?


And today innocent Palestinians is suffering because what Hamas did. Israeli government has no choice but to retaliate.
I'm sorry. I never really buy that; not the "no choice". Also, they get 100% authority over what their "retaliation" looks like. I understand the "need to respond"....that that's probably the extent of our agreement on this.

If that retaliation looks like TWENTY times the number of deaths, I'm sorry but I don't accept that that was "their only choice". (374 Isarelis, 7400ish Palestinians fatalities...... OR 6700 Israeli injuries compared to 163,000 Palestinians)
Data on casualties | United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - Occupied Palestinian Territory
Play around with the settings, time frames, and locations to get clear ideas of how "slaughter-like" this conflict is as opposed to "war-like".

When Isael passively allows their settlers to terrorize and steal land and houses from Palestinians/Gazans, that is not a NECESSARY "choice". They could choose to respect the boundaries and keep their settlers on the leash some of them seem to need. When there are reports of IDF Soldiers randomly breaking the arms of children while out on patrols. When I first read that report, I nearly threw up and the brutal ugliness that IDF soldiers are willing to stoop to. I have been trying to find that report back but it's tough to find.

Or just poor, poor treatment of children:
Israel: Security Forces Abuse Palestinian Children
Upvote 0

Awake Or Asleep?

That's a great question. And I do not know the answer for sure, as I am a nobody, still growing in the knowledge of God. But here is what I think I understand, according to my studies in Faith. There is a Holy Day called "The Last great Day", it's actually the 8th day of the Feast of the Lord called "Feasts of Tabernacles", which point to being kings and priests of God in earthly vessels, (Booths) which were given them as Paul teaches. (For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.)

In my understanding, this "Last Great Day" is the last judgment. At this point all humans in God's plan have been given the "Choice". I don't believe there is another resurrection, or another judgment after this "Last Great Day". And eternity is a long time, and I'm sure God has plans for His People after all this has been fulfilled, that we have not been shown.

But honestly, I don't know for sure, and I might be completely wrong, goodness knows I have been corrected before. And that's OK, because in my understanding, what's important is to be "be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless." And to "press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus". And have faith that God will reveal these things to me in His Good Time.

It's good, in my view, to have these discussions. Thank you for your thoughtful posts.
Where does it say "last great day" in the Bible? I know Jesus says four times he will resurrect or raise people up on the last day, and he says judgment day is on the last day.
Upvote 0

God, omnibenevolent or omnipotent and omniscient?

Theodicies depend on 2 assumptions. First, the evils of the world are without purpose. Second, the evil in the world is without remedy. Both of these assumptions are false, as seen in the brutality of the cross. None of God's omni attributes need give way, it is the assumptions that theodicies are built on that is faulty.
Upvote 0

BUSTED - 12 False theories refuted:

Why would Christians need to offer sacrifices when we have Jesus, the Lamb of God and our once and for all sacrifice?
Ezekiel 40 to 46 gives the reasons. God does not change, Malachi 3:6 Note also Malachi 3:3-4, where the Lord will purify the Levites, so they will again be fit to make Offerings to the Lord.
So first of all, Christians have to build a 3rd temple, then we have to reinstate sacrifices before Jesus can return?
Then the beast will force all that goes on in that temple to cease?
Correct, As it is Prophesied in the Bible. Isaiah 56:1-8, & Daniel 11:32
Are you saying those Prophesies won't happen?
Jesus' return must be a long way off - Israel is currently at war and there are no signs of Christians going over there to build anything.
I think Jesus will Return in about 15/20 years. I base this on Revelation 8:1, where we are told the time period from the Sixth Seal to the Glorious Return, will be about a half hour in heaven. This time can be calculated to earth time by using the formula given in Psalms 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8
1/48th of a day in heaven equals 1/48th of a thousand years on earth.
Many Prophesies tell us how the entire Holy Land will be cleared and cleansed. Then the Lord will send rain and make the Land like the garden of Eden. Then His peoples will gather and live there. Isaiah 35:1-10 says it very well.
I don't deny any Scripture - I disagree with your interpretation.
This is not at all the same thing. You did not write Scripture and are most certainly not God.
I merely point out the truths of scripture, I am just one of God's messengers, as my name: Keraz means.
If what you have said is true, surely one sure sign of an imminent return would be an exodus of Christians from all over the world TO the Holy Land?
That hasn't even begun to happen.
It will, after the Lord intervenes when Iran tries to send nuke missiles to the holy Land. Zephaniah 3:8-10....My worshippers now dispersed beyond the River of Ethiopia*, will bring offerings to Me.

*The River [or sea] of Ethiopia, is the Atlantic Ocean on ancient maps. The reference here, is to America and Canada.

There is plenty of Bible Prophecy detailing the Great Second Exodus of the Lords peoples into all of the Holy Land. Ezekiel 34;11-15, Isaiah 11:11-12, Romans 9:24-26
Upvote 0

The 2025 Government Shutdown Thread

"We're not targeting federal agencies based on politics," Vance said. "We're targeting the people's government so that it as much if possible of the essential services get to continue to function."

(Let's see what the boss says.)

"I have a meeting today with Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame, to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut, and whether or not those cuts will be temporary or permanent," the president wrote on social media.

(Speaker Johnson, asked about potential firings, puts on his weasel-skin hat.)

"Is it constitutional? Is it lawful? Is it part of our system? Of course it is. It always has been," Johnson said without giving more details.
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

What Am I Missing Here?

Your answer is in the article.
"The act of breastfeeding can promote emotional healing and bonding if they have a subsequent pregnancy or if they choose to adopt."
Also, it's recommended to still breastfeed even if the child can eat food, up to 2 years old.
Two years old? Sheesh. The kid should have a job by then. Buy his own food.
  • Like
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

Except that society determines the 'objective' principles. Whether it's a Muslim society, a secular society, a Christian society...

If morality is entirely determined by society, then reformers (e.g., abolitionists, civil rights leaders) would always be “immoral,” since they opposed prevailing norms.

Different societies hold radically different moral codes (e.g., one condemns slavery, another permits it). If both are “objectively right” because society says so, then contradictory moral systems are equally valid. But that undermines the idea of objective morality, which by definition should hold true universally.
Upvote 0

What Am I Missing Here?

I knew most babies can eat solid food at 4 to 6 months, so I assumed moms would stop breastfeeding around then. I guess some just want to continue, or need to because of an excess of milk?
Your answer is in the article.
"The act of breastfeeding can promote emotional healing and bonding if they have a subsequent pregnancy or if they choose to adopt."
Also, it's recommended to still breastfeed even if the child can eat food, up to 2 years old.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,876,009
Messages
65,375,398
Members
276,240
Latest member
mayersdylaan45