• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Venting Thread

I wish I could join a group of people who wanted to look for God and try to help save our Universe from wickedness and hatred.
You probably could, but then would , eventually and hopefully, start to see that that group is opposed to Jesus and contrary in most ways to the Bible, God's Word. Possibly naive? Definitely not obedient to what God Says in His Word in His Instructions to anyone who chooses to seek Him.
Upvote 0

Men attend less singles events than women

That sounds like more of an issue of confidence than the other. Your experiences have made you hesitant and you aren’t putting your best foot forward. An image consultant might help. They assist with your appearance, presentation, body language and confidence.

~bella
Well ,all far as appearances are concerned, that is why I love Formal Nights on cruises. Those Formal Nights are the only time that women pay attention to me. When I wear my black tux pants and white Dinner Jacket, some women ask ME to dance. I very rarely get turned down for a dance on Formal Nights. But, I cannot wear my white Dinner Jacket when I go grocery shopping.:cool:
  • Like
Reactions: bèlla
Upvote 0

When does blindness occur?

All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our flesh[a] and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature deserving of wrath. "

Thank you.
no, no thanks due me. See the Creator while He May Be Found, thanking HIM for His Mercy.....
Upvote 0

When does blindness occur?

They are actually dead, according to Ephesians 2:2. To believe that a dead person is willingly rebellious against God requires a great effort to read into the verse.
No, no effort at all. Read all Scripture and see if the dead are obedient or rebelling against the spirit. The flesh is always opposed to the spirit, opposed to Jesus, rebellious in sin against the Creator, naturally , as written in and throughout Scripture.
Upvote 0

The History of the “Two Laws” Theory in Romans 3:20

lol The arrogance. One day actually study the history of your church away from the propaganda that you are taught.
lol The ignorance. If you studied EO and Catholic doctrinal sources for yourself, along with the ECFs, then you should know enough history to make a responsible statement. Got aways to go there.
Upvote 0

The Eucharist in the Early Church

Better than that, I have three iPad Pros and one lightweight iPad air all with Retina displays, and with Kindle, Google Play Books, iBooks, Scribd/Everand, O’Reilly Books Online (for computer science related books), a vast PDF library and access to Archive.org’s digital lending library as a print-disabled reader.
I don’t know what that all means but I’m glad that at least you have comfortable ways to read.
Upvote 0

The History of the “Two Laws” Theory in Romans 3:20

So what do you do with this: Col 2:14 "having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross"? It means the law is "wiped out" and can't condemn us (Rom. 8:1).

I agree that obedience to God is the result of being saved from sin by God's grace. It makes us so grateful to God that we love Him and want to please Him.

But it seems to me that your initial response had this behind it: "you're teaching antinominaism!!"
Wasn't it?
Col 2:14 is only speaking of a certificate of debt, legal indebtedness that we owe due to our sins. Jesus wipes out that indebtedness, that claim against us.

"...having canceled the charge of our legal indebtedness, which stood against us and condemned us; he has taken it away, nailing it to the cross." NIV

"...by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross." ESV

And the reason those in Christ not condemned in Rom 8:1 is because "through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you free from the law of sin and death." This is because the Spirit can actually accomplish in us what the law could only testify to (Rom 3:21) but could not accomplish as it was weakend by the flesh. The Spirit can and will, indeed, fulfill the righteous requirements of the law in you (Rom 8:2-4, Rom 8:12-14).
Upvote 0

Should Trump have been banned from running for president?

Let's be clear. This isn't about believing Trump more than the media or Democrats. It's believing Trump more than experts, institutions, and objective fact-based reality.

It requires listening to the very words he speaks and then creating ad hoc justifications.

"Oh, well he didn't really mean that"
"Oh, it's a joke"
"All politicians say the same thing"

Donald Trump once said he could shoot a man in broad daylight and his followers would still love him.

He was right. There is nothing he could do or say that would cause his most devoted followers to defect. It's almost supernatural the way he acquires loyalty. One might even wonder if it's literally demonic.

-CryptoLutheran
I suppose that makes the left's failure even worse. What does that say about the nation's confidence in the Democratic Party and MSM (including "experts," "institutions," "objective-based reality")? Most Trump voters do not love him. Like me, they cringe when they pull the lever. A large part of that pull is due to the horrid candidates and polices of the left. I like your word demonic.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

Your only proving my point that no matter who I put you will want to discredit them all. It only proves your biased.

All the tests and files are on this site under Vase Scan Resources. I am pretty sure I linked this before.

Ancient Precision: Confirmed!
Led by Chris Dunn, Alex Dunn and Nick Sierra, the team gathered in a precision lab in Danville IL to do a hands-on metrology inspection of several vases. Not only that, but many more of the remarkable ancient, hard stone vases that come from pre-dynastic and early dynastic ancient Egypt have been scanned via structured light and CT-Xray, and the results are frankly astonishing.

Dr Max is an expert in metrology ans scientific testing. Being an archologists or Egyptologists is the wrong industry for precision testing which is more to do with engineering and precision tooling. I am pretty sure the skeptics on this page are also not archeologists and Egyptologists. Yet their opinion is being claimed as credible to dispute these researchers. Its gross hypocrac y.

I did not say that any of this is at the stage of peer review. This is the testing that will go into the papers. You have to do the testing first. The testing of vases only started to gather interest 12 months ago.

But his tests done with experts I named was performed at the Petrie museum. Proper formal tests with proper equipment and then the results published on open source for anyone to review and dispute. Which has not happened yet.

No one is disputing these findings except those on this social media site. At least they have performed the tests and formerly published the findings for critique. Like I said theres an open source go and refute the findings and send it in.


Then you will have to explain why he is there in the background as part of the team testing the vases at the Petrie museum. Yes he was also a expert consultant on the project. Look Karoly is even pointing to him for you. He looks like he is also sick of all these ad hominems lol. Though he puts on a brave face.

View attachment 371493

The funny thing is in looking at this pic is that skeptics use the Russian guys who do experiments in their backyard to show that these precision vases can be made by hand The vases Olga made which were tested. Yet they are happy to use them and never expect they produce peer review. Just the experiment alone in the backyard is used as evidence to refute any advanced tech. Hypocrites.

They actually helps develop the software (Petriescope) to calculate the precision in the vases. They played the most crucial role as the software is what establishes the precision and needs to be accurrate. The most important part. Thats 3 PHD scientists.

I find this funny. That probably half if not 2/3 of this post and this entire thread is now dedicated to logical fallacies. Expending all this time and energy on ad hominems.

Ironically or rather hypocritically those creating these fallacies have not themselves established their credibility and expect everyone to just accept their words as though it has been peer reviewed. Like I said at least these researchers have expertise and have actually done tests and published the results for others to formerly refute. Not on some social media page.

Above. Ad hominems are attacking the source, authors, researchers and not addressing the actual content (test results) and how they are wrong. You spend more time on attacking the source than showing their results are actually wrong. Your aim is to discredit the source to discredit the results. While I might add not showing your own credentials in doing any of this like its some social media blog.

You missed the point. Your complaining about the lack of experts doing the tests but your doing this yourself without establishing you are an expert to make these claims that they are not experts. It works both ways. I am using your own fallacy on you. If these researchers are not experts then the same applied to you. Your not an expert to determine their not experts lol.

But they are experts and that's the other fallacy of a false representation. Dunns team are experts in the very metrology thaty has measured the vases having expensive knowledge and experience in NASA level precision tooling. The vase signatures are compared to modern tolerances of precision tooling. The exact industry and expertise needed. Better than archeologists and Egyptologists.

The Artifact Foundation has experts on the team. PHD level in the software that measures the precision. Expertise like Dunn in Christ Smith who also has expertise knowledge and experience in engineering and precision tooling at the aerospace level. Dr Max is a physicist and well positioned to be dealing with micron precision.

The only thing I agree on is that it would be better if these results were at the stage of peer review. Its not that they are not willing. IN some ways they are already open for peer review in that they are open to the public to review and critique formerly. But as I said more testing is ongoing to build a robust data base to then be able to make a stronger case.

Only one museum has been tested. As a big part of the objection is providance then more museum vases are needed to be tested to ensure these vases were common part of the pre dynastics.

Thats a unsubstanciated claim. How they choose to disseminate their findings is rigorous and factual. In fact I find it one of the most credible ways of doing things in science. That they actually have the live tests to see the actual readings for yourself. You can't fake an instrument in front of people. When the results are repeated independently at least 3 times thats good science.

So therefore just like the testers anyone who wants to refute these tests needs to do the same and formerly retest their results to see if they come to a different findings. Not sit in some laounge chair on social media complaining or creating some numbers conspiracy that in without any formal published article.

I could go on social media claiming all sorts of stuff and that others have got it wrong. Its full of stuff like that lol.

Its the only stuff we have at the moment. The idea of precision vases only became a thing around 8 years ago. But no one offically started until 2023 and even then no one had tested museum vases until 2025. Its literally happening now as a new area of research. So these tests are really the first ones.

So you have to deal with whats available and what stage its at and what is being claimed. I have also pointed out that mainstream archeology has known of the out of place works for decades but either hid it or did not bother to look into it. These vases were talked about as precise and beyond the predynastics tech 100 years ago by Petrie. \

Other articles just on the Naqada or predynastic Egyptians generally have always mentioned these vases as being the peak of the pottery and vase making and being made by some sort of lathe. Its just that no one bothered to measure them with modern tech until recently.

Believe me it is. Yours is just one in a long line of logical fallacies I have had to deal with lol. Anyway it doesn't change the fact its an ad hominem that you are spending more time, over half this post on the credibility of sources and nothing on the actual content and whether it is correct or not.
OK, so you've got some vases which appear to have been made by techniques which the ancient Egyptians were not known to use.

How do you get from there to Atlantis?
Upvote 0

Fear, pain and hunger: The dire impact of shutting down USAID in Africa, leaving a vacuum for China and Russia

Sure you do. A YouGov poll showed that 24% of the left would celebrate the death of a political opponent.

24 percent isn't the majority. Not even that large of a minority. So it's hardly a typical attitude for "the Left".
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

Are you saying that justifiable self defence where you have to kill your attacker or die yourself is immoral? Or that lying to save the family in the basement is likewise immoral?
No of course not. But the question is can there be a conext under relative or subjective morality where that is ok. How would you have any objective basis to do that considering that conext itself is arbitary and subjective.
Upvote 0

The History of the “Two Laws” Theory in Romans 3:20

Only to Israel. The covenant to the house of Israel still remains until the time of the gentiles is finished.
The issue of what type of contract the Mosaic Covenant is is independent of the issue of who it is made with.

Where? Evidence please.
For example, God said that he was a husband to Israel (Jeremiah 31:32) and Israel's unfaithfulness was described as adultery, with eventually got so bad that God wrote the Northern Kingdom a write of divorce (Jeremiah 3:8).

But that is exactly what Jesus stated. He stated that all of the law of the prophets (Matt 7:12) is summarized in the “treat them as you would like to be treated” commandment.
That is not what Jesus stated. A sum is inclusive of all of its parts and the reason why the greatest two commandments are the greatest two is because they are inclusive of all of the other commandments. For example, if we love God and our neighbor, then we won't commit adultery, theft, murder, idolatry, rape, favoritism, kidnapping, and so forth for the rest of God's other commandments. The greatest two commandments as much easier said than done, so thankfully God graciously gave us the rest of His commandments in order to flesh out what it looks like to correctly obey them. Someone who was correctly living in obedience to the greatest two commandments would be indistinguishable from someone who was correctly living in obedience to the rest of God's other commandments because they would both be following the same example that Jesus set for us to follow.

Sure but you quote old covenant terms. The house of Israel is not the New Testament church.
The Greek word "ekklesia" is translated as "church" and is used many times in the Septuagint to refer to Israel in the wilderness. In Ephesians 2:12-19, Gentiles were at one time separated from Christ, alienated from Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in this world, which is in accordance with Gentiles at one time not being doers of God's law, but through faith in Christ all of that is no longer true in that Gentiles are no longer strangers or aliens but are fellow citizens of Israel along with the saints in the household of God, which is in accordance with Gentiles becoming doers of God's law.

I disagree. Jesus redeeming sacrifice on the cross changed the salvation formula but even in the old covenant the determining factor for salvation was faith not the law (Heb. 11).
In Psalms 119:29-30, it describes the one and only way of salvation by grace through faith, so the salvation formula did not change. Salvation was never earned as the result of our obedience to God's law, but rather God graciously teaching us to be a doer of it is the way that He is giving us His gift of salvation.

But not as a requirement for salvation. The verses are clear that we are made a workmanship of Christ and will do the works prepared in advance for us to do so we do works naturally from salvation but there is nothing here about doing the works of the law.
Our salvation from sin would be incomplete if we were only saved from the penalty of our sin while our lives continued to be directed at being doers of sin, so there is an aspect of our gift of salvation that we are experiencing in the present by being a doer of God's law, which is what Titus 2:11-13 describes. The content of a gift can be the experience of doing something, such as giving someone the opportunity to experience driving a Ferrari, where the gift intrinsically requires them to do the work of driving it in order to have that experience, but where doing that work contributes nothing towards earning the opportunity to experience driving it. Similarly, the content of God's gift of eternal life is the experience of knowing Him and Jesus (John 17:3), and the gift of God's law is His instructions for how to have that experience, which we are intrinsically required to follow. God's law is His instructions for equipping us to do every good works (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

Psalm 119:29-30 is not a part of the new covenant. The audience was Israel and hardly applicable to the Christian church.
The Psalms are the OT book that is most quoted by the NT, so the authors of the NT certainly considered it to be applicable to the Christian church.

“For all who are of works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all the things written in the book of the Law, to do them.” Now, that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, “the righteous one will live by faith.” However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, “The person who performs them will live by them.” Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us—for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”— in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham would come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.”
‭‭Galatians‬ ‭3‬:‭10‬-‭14‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

These verses are pretty damning to your argument. You quote Gal. 5 but fail to take into account Paul’s teaching regarding the keeping of the law. The freedom of Gal. 5 does not speak about keeping the law.
According to Deuteronomy 27-30, the way to be blessed is by relying on the Book of the Law while the way to be cursed is by not relying on it, so Galatians 3:10 should not be interpreted as Paul quoting from that passage in order to support a point that is arguing the opposite of that passage. Rather, the way to be cursed is by not continuing to do everything in the Book of the Law, which is why everyone who relies on "works of the law" instead come under that curse. In Romans 3:27, Paul contrasted a law of works with a law of faith, in Galatians 3:10-12, he contrasted the Book of the law with "works of the law" and in Romans 3:31 and Galatians 3:10-12, he said that our faith upholds the Law of God in contrast with saying that "work of the law" are not of faith, so that phrase does not refer to the Law of God, which is why it is not of faith.

In Galatians 3:10-12, Paul associated a quote from Habakkuk 2:4 that the righteous shall live by faith with a quote from Leviticus 18:5 that the one who obeys the Law of God shall live by it, so the righteous who are living by faith are the same as those who are living in obedience to the Law of God. In Isaiah 51:7, the righteous are those on whose heart is God's law, and in 1 John 3:4-7, everyone who is a doer of righteous works in obedience to the Law of God is righteous even as they are righteous, so the righteous living by faith does not refer to an alternative manner of living that is not in obedience to God.

God is trustworthy, therefore His law is also trustworthy (Psalms 19:7), so the way to trust in God is by obediently trusting in His instructions, it is contradictory to think that we should trust in God for salvation but in in His instructions, and the position that God is a giver us untrustworthy instructions that are not of faith is a position that denies the trustworthiness and faithfulness of God.

In Deuteronomy 28, it describes the blessing of the law for lawfulness and the curse of the law for lawlessness, so being set free from the curse of the law is being set free from lawlessness in order to enjoy the blessing of lawfulness. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to redeem us from the Law of God but in order to redeem us from all lawlessness.

Gods law is no longer the Jewish law for the Christian church but it still remain for the unbelieving Israel. The spirit now convicts us not the law.

“For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭8‬:‭2‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

“For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭8‬:‭2‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
The Bible refers to the Law of Moses as being the Law of God in verses like Nehemiah 8:1-8, Ezra 7:6-12, and Luke 2:22-23. In Romans 7-8:2, Paul said the Law of God is good, that he wanted to do good, that he delighted in obeying it, and that he served it with his mind in contrast with the law of sin, which was working within his members to cause him not to do the good that he wanted to do, which was waging war against the law of his mind, which he served with his flesh, which held him captive, and from which the Law of the Spirit has freed us, so the Law of Moses is not the law of sin and death. The Law of God leads us to do what is holy, righteous, and good (Romans 7:12) while the law of sin stirs up sinful passions in order to bear fruit unto death (Romans 7:5), so we need to be set free from the law of sin in order to be free to obey the Law of Moses, not the other way around. Nowhere does the Bible state that the Law of God is no longer the Law of Moses or that the Law of Moses remains only for unbelieving Israel. Again, Romans 8:4-7 contrast those who walk in the Spirit with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who refuse to submit to the Law of Moses.

The commandments of God here is not the law or even the 10. The commandments are the commandments of Jesus (2 commandments not 613 Jewish laws).
In Matthew 22:36-40, Jesus was asked about which commandment is the greatest, not about which were the only commandments that we should still follow, and the existence of the greatest two commandments implies that there are still other commandments that are not the greatest two. What Jesus said in Matthew 22:36-40 should not be interpreted in a way that is contrary to Jesus affirming that man shall live by every word that comes from the mouth of God. Jesus taught obedience to more than just the two greatest commandments just in Matthew 5.

Sure but remember that where there is no sin there is no law. Christ fulfilled the law (completed it as no one ever could) so we are now convicted of our sin by the spirit not from the law).
All of God's righteous laws are eternal (Psalms 119:160), so there is still the Law of God. "To fulfill the law" means "to cause God's will (as made known in the law) to be obeyed as it should be" (NAS Greek Lexicon: pleroo), so Jesus fulfilled the law by teaching us how to correctly obey it. According to Galatians 5:14, anyone who has ever loved their neighbor has fulfilled the entire law, so it refers to something that countless people have done, not to something that only Christ did.

In Acts 5:32, the Spirit has been given to those who obey God. In John 16:13, the Spirit has the role of leading us in truth, in Ezekiel 36:26-27, the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey the Law of Moses, and in Psalms 119:142, the Law of Moses is truth. In John 16:8, the Spirit has the role of convicting us of sin, and in Romans 3:20, it is by the Law of Moses that we have knowledge of what sin is. In Galatians 5:16-23, Paul contrasted the desires of the flesh with the desires of the Spirit and everything that he listed as works of the flesh that are against the Spirit are also against the Law of Moses while all of the fruits of the Spirit are aspects of God's character that the Law of Moses was graciously given in order to teach us how to embody. In Romans 2:25-29, the way to recognize that a Gentile has a circumcised heart is by observing their obedience to the Law of Moses, which is the same way to tell for a Jew (Deuteronomy 30:6), and circumcision of the heart is a matter of the Spirit, which is in contrast with Acts 7:51-53, where those with uncircumcised hearts resist the Spirit and do not obey the Law of Moses.

“But I do not consider my life of any account as dear to myself, so that I may finish my course and the ministry which I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify solemnly of the gospel of God’s grace. “And now behold, I know that all of you, among whom I went about preaching the kingdom, will no longer see my face.”
‭‭Acts‬ ‭20‬:‭24‬-‭25‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Not sure why you are using these verses. Nothing here about the law.
It shows that Paul also taught the Gospel of the Kingdom, which calls for our obedience to the Law of Moses (Matthew 4:15-23).

“When they had set a day for Paul, people came to him at his lodging in large numbers; and he was explaining to them by solemnly testifying about the kingdom of God and trying to persuade them concerning Jesus, from both the Law of Moses and from the Prophets, from morning until evening.”
‭‭Acts‬ ‭28‬:‭23‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Yes and Paul also said:
That does not nullify that Paul also taught the Gosepl of the Kingdom based on the Law of Moses.

“To the Jews I became as a Jew, so that I might gain Jews; to those who are under the Law, I became as one under the Law, though not being under the Law myself, so that I might gain those who are under the Law;”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭9‬:‭20‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Paul was going to preach the gospel of good news to the Jews as a Jew do he could convert Jews. Understand that Paul is not going to call the law a curse in Galatians to now defend the law in Acts 28. Paul is not bipolar.
Paul was speaking about giving up his rights in order to meet people where they were at, not about deciding people about what he believed. Paul did not call the law a curse, but rather the Bible repeatedly says that it is a blessing. In Romans 10:5-8, Paul referred to Deuteronomy 13 as the word of faith that we proclaim in regard to proclaiming that the Mosaic Law is not too difficult for us to obey and that obedience to it brings life and a blessing while disobedience brings death and a curse, so choose life! Paul should not be interpreted as speaking against following what he considered to be Scripture as if he were bipolar.

Then Paul and others are preaching a different gospel. No where in the New Testament does it teach that the Christian is still under the Jewish law. Absolutely no where. The whole if the NT teaches exactly the opposite. As Paul teaches if you keep the law then you have your keep all of it. Good luck with that since only God as man was able to keep it perfectly.
The different Gospel that Paul was referring to in Galatian 1:6-7 should not be interpreted in a way that turns it against the Gospel that Jesus and Paul taught. Jesus set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Law of Moses and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:6), so Christ spent this ministry teaching his followers to obey the Law of Moses by word and by example and in Matthew 28:16-20, he commissioned his disciples to teach to the nations everything that he taught them. Gentiles are not permitted to sin and it is by the Mosaic Law that we have knowledge of what sin is (Romans 3:20), so the position that Gentiles are not required to obey it is the position that Gentiles do not need to refrain from sin, do not need the Gospel, do not need salvation from sin, do not need grace, and do not need Jesus to have given himself to redeem us from all lawlessness. The only reason why someone would need to have perfect obedience to the Law of Moses is if they are going to give themselves to pay for the sins of the world - the rest of us can thankfully have our sins forgiven.
Upvote 0

Why do people hate ICE...

I'm not on board with all of that however the deaf, blind and decieved will be attacking you soon.
Pay them no mind.
Some really don't seem to be able to help themselves.
I agree. I am only commenting from the sidelines. Its actually quite scarry what is happening around the world with the increasing political climate. Immigration issues and terror and security seems to be big issues for most western nations now. The world is not a happy place at the moment.

Though the peace deal in the middle east is one shining hope. But something has to be done to sort all this chaos out.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,876,522
Messages
65,384,495
Members
276,278
Latest member
HenryJove