Israel is losing Americans (support)
- By FAITH-IN-HIM
- American Politics
- 160 Replies
Do you believe Hamas will let Gaza's citizens freely choose their leader?That would be up to the Gazans
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you believe Hamas will let Gaza's citizens freely choose their leader?That would be up to the Gazans
A problem for no one but the Dispensationalists.That would create gaps in the genealogical records of the Bible.
Speaking of banks, 7 more houses collapsed on the Outer Banks due in part to sea level rise due to climate change.How do you know it is God's voice talking to you about climate change and the state of the banks?
What isn't clear to you? Can you describe the problem or form a question?We could use some clarity about this post
It does seem to me The iSRAEL AND jUDAH are yet to be BORN. AGAIN. until the BODY of Christ has been caught up to beThat seems to be another misinterpretation, if only Israel will be born again — are you implicating non is as of now? — there are no gentile believers in our Lord Christ Jesus, because as I stated above you have to be born again to be able to believe that Jesus is the Christ.
There are four groups, not three:
1. Unbelievers
2. Children of God
3. Sons of God
4. Those who come to the body of Christ.
Except for #1 it is all a matter of faith, talking about millionaires doesn't make you a millionaire.
Aristarkos
Which, aside from a few show raids, is still going on....and certain legitimate businesses go out of business; when they have to compete with illegal competitors, who pay even more illegals low ball wages, under the table.
We could use some clarity about this postAn ad hominem attack logical fallacy is qualified as an attempt to avoid the valid substantive matter of an argument by attacking the Character of the person making the valid argument.
It is therefore a BAD FORM OF CHARACTER to engage in an ad hominem attack. If someone points out the BAD FORM of an ad hominem attacker, some people will double down on the BAD FORM by attempting to claim the one who is pointing out the BAD FORM of the ad hominem attacker is hypocritical for attacking the Character of the ad hominem attacker, even though they didn't do so to avoid the substantive argument.
I like clarity, not obfuscation. Are you saying Biden said, "They're poisoning the blood of our country"...?
That would be up to the GazansLet me ask the question again: Can you identify a leader from Gaza who can represent its population?
You may be surprised to know that a lot of those people are ostracized in that particular culture group and so they tend to hang around each other. In other words, it's a show about a friend group of lgbtq.I quoted the maker of the show, and based on their own words, this show in particular was more than just having a character.
Steele describes this as not just being simple representation, describing it as “meant to be in the structure and the bones of the show.”
And in another part of the interview:
TD: The original was supposed to be more of an adult cartoon, and I know it still has a curse word and references to porn in it. And I know that you were asked to take some of that out to make it more youth friendly. So I guess my question is: what was that decision like when you were making the Netflix show? Did you always want it to be more friendly for kids? Or were you originally thinking about making it adult-oriented like your original project?
HS: No, funnily enough the adult comedy was added to it. I didn’t pitch it as adult, and then Cartoon Hangover’s brand at the time was trying to make more adult cartoons, and then halfway through production they changed their mind because I think it demonetized their videos, and that was their whole business model. So it used to be a lot worse. There was some proper bad stuff in there.
So we took out what we could and we left in the stuff we did, and we still think it’s funny. And then the comic was more YA, I wouldn’t say adult, I guess more teen. It kind of set the tone of the show. No, I wanted it to be kind of kid friendly but see what we could get away with.
So in this case, it's not merely that a gay character was in the show... it sounds like activism was the point.
Given the demographic makeup of the characters, they swung the pendulum in the other direction when it comes to societally proportional representation.
As I noted from the synopsis of the show earlier. 80% of the main characters non-cis/non-straight...that doesn't represent demographic reality either.
So we both haven't seen the show I guess.I don't know if you'd even encounter those kinds of ratios at a Sam Smith concert.
An ad hominem attack logical fallacy is qualified as an attempt to avoid the valid substantive matter of an argument by attacking the Character of the person making the valid argument. It is therefore a BAD FORM OF CHARACTER to engage in an ad hominem attack.You should remember that when Conservatives likened Biden's speeches and left-wing censorship tactics to things Hitler did and said, we were accused of "Godwin's Law". Your own comparison's of Trump to Hitler and no more valid.
And. of course, the working poor are not truly needy--is that it?I didn't say anything about benefits from employers. In fact I said we SHOULD help those who are truly needy.
Let me ask the question again: Can you identify a leader from Gaza who can represent its population?No one said that you chose the answer, but that you had already determined what it was before you asked the "question".
1) Are you just making thigns up? The summer of love was 67.It’s interesting you accuse me of denying that things happened or exist yet in the paragraph above you’re doing the exact same thing.
$2 billion in damage from these mostly peaceful protest seven people dead minority businesses loaded and destroyed all during what was called the summer of love.
you mean the time when 93% of the protests were nonviolent?No multiply that by the different places that it was happening.
Which violence are you talking about? The BLM violence that occurred while Trump was in charge?Oh wow, the Biden‘s administration turned their back on violence and even denied it was happening.
In this entire post you alluded to some kind of event that happenned but never named it. The only event I can guess didn't even happen under the Biden adminstration...it happenned under trump (surprise, surprise). And it seems like you wouldn't be doing a good job saying "Biden is the problem" if you can only quote an event that happenned under Trump.Give me a break with your seeminglyfeigned concern
Psst...Biden wasn't president in June of 2020.It’s interesting you accuse me of denying that things happened or exist yet in the paragraph above you’re doing the exact same thing.
$2 billion in damage from these mostly peaceful protest seven people dead minority businesses loaded and destroyed all during what was called the summer of love.
Please explain to me how these verses = "The morality/righteousness of God is greater than the righteousness of the ten commandments." How are those verses that you referenced greater or superior than the 10 commandments?Matthew 5:21-22
Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment:
Galatians 5:22-23
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
The verse you're eluding to is talking about hypocritical judgement. The bible also says:Jesus said we will be judged by what measure we use to judge others.
What does that have to do with God being a judge and morality? If you're arguing that God's love gets rid of morality arguments, then you would have to say that ALL the verses that talk about us being judged on the last day don't apply. Just because God loves, doesn't mean he does away with justice.Well consider that the depth of God's Love was to suffer the sins of crucifixion, being stripped naked and mocked, and scorned, beaten, and scourged; yet he prayed to the Father that He forgive those whose sins he bore on his cross. <--This is a depth of Love that is far greater than "DON'T STEAL".
So you agree that there HAS to be a moral law then, which goes against your point that somehow, something else (God's love) supersedes the law, if by your own statement it is a testimony "against" us. God's love doesn't supersede his own law. God didn't abolish his own Jewish law, he fulfilled the requirements. So the same argument can be applied as a means of the moral law. He didn't abolish the moral law either. That means the law is still in place and if it's still in place, Jesus himself said if you love him, you will follow his commandments (aka, moral law).Yes, this above is true, and it is also why the law condemns us all as worthy of death and is a testimony against us, particularly as far as believing we can be made righteous according to our own carnal efforts to perform the law.
Not necessarily.But not routine benefits like health care.
I think that the majority of the problem of the cost of health care is BECAUSE of health insurance.It's pretty clear that you think health insurance should be an employment benefit or a private purchase but not a government program.
I don't know how you get "activism was the point" from those quotes. Seems to me, the point was to make a cartoon about LGBT characters dealing with issues encountered by people (teens especially) in the LGBT community, and life in general, in the US. That's not "activism" - it's just a different demographic. There are shows where the whole cast is Black and the core themes are all about Black (American) culture - would you call those shows unrealistic or activist? Or do they just have a target audience?I quoted the maker of the show, and based on their own words, this show in particular was more than just having a character.
So in this case, it's not merely that a gay character was in the show... it sounds like activism was the point.
I'm not going to address that but you have to admit, it a damn good look on him.This man is confused....
View attachment 371028
It’s interesting you accuse me of denying that things happened or exist yet in the paragraph above you’re doing the exact same thing.Oh please. American society was fine. "Society" didn't fall during Biden....that's a bunch of hyperbolic drivel that you've been sold and are REQUIRED to believe to justify what trump is doing to America now.
It’s interesting you accuse me of denying that things happened or exist yet in the paragraph above you’re doing the exact same thing.Oh please. American society was fine. "Society" didn't fall during Biden....that's a bunch of hyperbolic drivel that you've been sold and are REQUIRED to believe to justify what trump is doing to America now.
I most certainly agree that most Muslims are not the Islamist types. In fact many of them suffer under them.Apparently the vast majority of Muslims in the world, including the more than 4 million in the US, are ignorant of what Islam teaches as well. Either that or mainstream Islam teaches that Shari'a prioritizes peace and coexistence over war, and that war is to be used only as a last resort for self-defense or to protect the oppressed. Having extensively studied the religion of Islam and lived in the company of Muslims for much of my life, I'm going with the latter.
Still growing, and now another in Minnesota.Measles outbreak growing in parts of Arizona and Utah, health officials say
Measles vaccination rates have plummeted in the neighboring communities over the last 10 years.
Not with me, but Shumer’s stunt is losing some democrats.Did you consider them credible prior to this shut down?