Vatican releases doctrinal note defending monogamy, rejecting polygamy
- By RileyG
Good! Glory to God!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Science does nothing but lie about God's creation from the globe lie to the evolution lie
Adults can make their own decisions. Just leave minors alone and out of it.So the risk of suicide is almost double in veterans than in older gender minority adults. That is a good argument to avoid the military I guess.
In the longitudinal studies comparing pre- and post-surgery risk collated in this review, the risk for suicide are reduced after gender affirming surgery.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/26318318231189836
However the risk is still elevated compared to the population in general, but that is not strange. Living as a trans persons is of course another potential hardship.
Uhhh no one takes Andrew Tate seriously…,,.he’s too muchJust for the record, alpha men...
View attachment 373657
Oh my goodness....I think this is real.
Imagine how happy gay men are to know their population probably exploded!
Amen and amen!Gracious Heavenly Father and Lord Jesus,
I pray that you would bring PEOPLE into Rescued One's life, and quickly! Remind them that You are with them, and thus they are never truly alone.
In Christ's Name,
Amen
Yes. We learned how many people have been harmed by this ideology. Telling impressionable children they were born in the wrong body only causes immense harm.We learned stuff.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
-- A2SG, people don't always fit into the tidy boxes some want them to....
I don’t disagree at all.I'm well aware of that. The point this exchange derived from was that homosexual experimentation causes psychological damage, and that's far from demonstrable.
Sexual orientation isn't a choice, as you've noted, and even if someone chooses to experiment with a different orientation, the likelihood is they'll find it doesn't work for them, and they'll eventually settle on the one that's right for them. There is no evidence that this kind of activity necessarily results in psychological damage. Perhaps it might in certain specific cases, due to other issues, but for the vast majority of people, they're attracted to who they're attracted to, and they can't make themselves attracted to someone they're not. Which, as I noted, is why conversion therapy doesn't work.
-- A2SG, and I personally believe that anyone who has an opinion about someone else's sexual orientation should keep it to themselves.....
Well? It did develop over time, but there is plenty of evidence of children being baptized as early as the 2nd century.The Baptists have already won this argument a long time ago by one simple trick: THEY REDEFINE THE HISTORICAL DEFINITION OF "HOUSEHOLD" from all those living under the same roof regardless of age to only adults unless the Biblical text says there are children present. Do not believe this.
So how do we interpret Scripture here? We ask the diagnostic question(s): 1) Do the words and grammar of Scripture determine theological content and belief? 2) Or does your theological belief determine what words should mean in Scripture?
Clearly and plainly, Baptists use interpretative principle #2 when defining the word "household" due to their anti-paedo beliefs. By fiat, Baptists just declare a household can not have children living in them UNLESS THE TEXT SAYS CHILDREN ARE PRESENT! Pure eisegesis but this interpretation emotionally satisfies the Baptist belief in credobaptism. This is interpretive cheating.
Household baptisms scripturally are born from Peter's words....this promise is to you and your children (Acts 2:39). Baptists seem to ignore this passage of Scripture. A household is basically everyone leaving under the same roof regardless of age. A Baptist interpret a household as everyone leaving under the same roof except those under the Age of Accountability. How bogus!
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition of a household 1) those who dwell under the same roof and compose a family 2)a social unit composed of those living together in the same dwelling. And certainly the legal definition of a household: A household is composed of one or more people who occupy a housing unit. Tax filer + spouse + tax dependents = household. But of course the credo's discount this also.
The Scriptural definition of a household includes both children and servants .
One passage of Scripture which gives the credos harsh criticism is I Tim. 5:8.
- I Tim 3:12 A deacon must be faithful to his wife and must manage his children (τέκνων) and his household (οἴκων) well.
- I Tim 3:4 [A shepherd] must be one who manages his own household (οἴκου) well, keeping his children (τέκνα) under control with all dignity.
- "But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”
- Paul is clearly talking to believers here because only a believer can become worse than an unbeliever.
- Is Paul saying here because children are not specifically mentioned in this passage, Christian parents are exempt from providing for their smallest and youngest children?
- Nonsense. As is the same with credo's redefining words of Scripture to match their theological bias and a futile attempt to EXPLAIN AWAY paedobaptism altogether from Scripture.
Fair enough.I don’t really care what ai knows. I care what people think. That’s why I come to discussion boards. AI doesn’t have any better insight into your opinion than I can try to guess on my own.
It's okay, it's okay. I'm not on anyone's side, because no one is on my side. Baroom.I don't think I'm alone in that I've got that feeling in reading posts by some centrists.
The left gets shot at; the right gets shot at. Can centrists not take a bit of heat?
I don't think an understanding of his positions limits and what kind of things constitute illegal orders is a high bar to set, if even a one. Just feels like you don't expect anything of him.Why would anyone expect the president to be as smart as the White House lawyers in crafting Executive Branch documentation?
Of course I won't agree because I didn't say that and don't believe that.I guess you won't agree, even when I point out the logical form of your reasoning, that you are saying works are necessary for salvation?
I'm glad to see that I am not the only one who thought that Apple Sky was saying that NASA leaders are both Freemasons and royalty.NASA executives are not royalty.
Thanks. Perhaps a comma after the word "Freemasons" would make it clear that you didn't mean that the NASA leaders are royalty.I meant, Leaders who are mostly Freemasons & Royalty.
Sorry - It''s the way I must have worded it.
You continue to just ignore the fact that scripture teaches that the old covenant law was made obsolete (was no longer in effect) by the blood of Christ, which also established the new covenant, as written in Hebrews 8-10. Nothing you say can change that.Jesus never said anything, even after he rose from the dead, that the Law is now optional for any of them (Matthew 28:20).
So if obedience to the Law was required to enter the kingdom before the cross, it continue to be required after the cross.
Your repeated false explanations don't matter to me. You're right about that. But, that doesn't mean you can't share your opinions. Others can read your posts, too. If you think your explanation is the truth, then you should share it.There is a simpler explanation, but it won't matter to you.
Your use of the phrase "suicide stats" is really vague as it's split into ideation, attempt and successful attempt. Generally, these all follow the same pattern from what I've seen but not always."Gender affirming care" (According to Medicare data) increases suicide stats by double compared to "cis gender" population.
Another stat I saw cited that almost 20% of 10 year post op transgender individuals commit suicide. (40% attempt) I think that may be the HIGHEST suicide rate in any population. (At last it's the highest stat I've ever seen.)
Suicide rates general populations:
(Veterans = 14%)
(Police = .021%)
(Incarcerated in state or federal prisons = 8%)
Disparities in Suicidality by Gender Identity Among Medicare Beneficiaries - PMC
Suicidality is higher for gender minorities than the general population, yet little is known about suicidality in disabled or older adult gender minorities. This study used 2009–2014 Medicare claims to identify people with gender identity–related ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The house in Haarlem is left in its original state and is still a museum: Home | Corrie ten Boom HouseThat is wonderful to hear - what a special connection to Corrie ten Boom’s story. Her faithfulness in the midst of such trials continues to inspire so many of us. I love that you aspire to grow in faith as she did; her testimony reminds us that God’s grace can strengthen us to be faithful wherever He has placed us.
We learned stuff.Extreme ideologies such as these don't belong in public schools. Impressionable minors don't need to be exposed to it. Let them live their lives. Boys are boys, and girls are girls. 15-20 years ago, we never heard of this! Now it's everywhere! What changed? ugh
I'm well aware of that. The point this exchange derived from was that homosexual experimentation causes psychological damage, and that's far from demonstrable.No one is saying otherwise. Behavior, is a choice. Sexual orientation and sexual behavior are two different things. That's the difference.