A - B - C - of Hymns
- By Apple Sky
- Bible and Book Games
- 1002 Replies
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
![]()
Sign language services 'intrude' on Trump's ability to control his image, administration says
The Trump administration is arguing that requiring real-time American Sign Language interpretation of events like White House press briefings “would severely intrude on the President’s prerogative to control the image he presents to the public," part of a lawsuit seeking to require the White...www.pbs.org
The Trump administration is arguing that requiring real-time American Sign Language interpretation of events like White House press briefings “would severely intrude on the President’s prerogative to control the image he presents to the public,” part of a lawsuit seeking to require the White House to provide the services.Department of Justice attorneys haven’t elaborated on how doing so might hamper the portrayal President Donald Trump seeks to present to the public. But overturning policies encompassing diversity, equity and inclusion have become a hallmark of his second administration, starting with his very first week back in the White House.The National Association for the Deaf sued the Trump administration in May, arguing that the cessation of American Sign Language interpretation — which the Biden administration had used regularly — represented “denying hundreds of thousands of deaf Americans meaningful access to the White House’s real-time communications on various issues of national and international import.” The group also sued during Trump’s first administration, seeking ASL interpretation for briefings related to the COVID-19 pandemic.How petty can a person be! It hurts his image??
Thanks.The thumbnail uses a photo of Clint Eastwood, but the situation itself is not real
This kind of thumbnail is extremely common on YouTube. Here’s what’s going on:
1. The image of Clint Eastwood is real
It’s a genuine photo of him — usually taken from a movie still, interview, or press image.
2. The scenario is fake
Clint Eastwood did not tell Joel Osteen anything, and Joel Osteen did not tell Clint Eastwood “Get out of here, old man.” The thumbnail is designed to look dramatic, but it’s not depicting a real event.
3. The text is added for clickbait
The phrase “GET OUT OF HERE, OLD MAN” is not something Clint Eastwood said in real life. It’s simply added to provoke curiosity.
4. The two men were never in that moment together
The thumbnail is a composite — two unrelated images placed side by side to create a fake confrontation.
5. The video itself is a storytelling/dramatization channel
These channels often use:
- celebrity faces
- dramatic titles
- emotional thumbnails …to get views, even when the story is fictional or loosely inspired.
Searched MS Copilot and this is what it came up with. Hope this helps you.

I can't say that I have an answer to that question. Though it does concern me that we should find it difficult to identify something uniquely American about our culture. For me I think it not so difficult, but it has to do with being a nation of immigrants who work together to be a beacon of freedom and ingenuity. That does not seem to resonate so much right now with our trying to kick everyone out.It is a good answer. But the point that I was trying to raise is that if people have difficulty trying to identify what about our cultural identity that is uniquely American, how can they possibly know when it is lost?
Your math doesn't math.They debunk the chart.
Chart debunked. Moving on.
it seems like attacks of this nature were more common here in the USA but now they’re everywhere. It’s so scary.Catholic leaders in Australia have responded with prayer and condemnation of antisemitism following what police described as a terrorist attack on a Hanukkah celebration at Sydney’s Bondi Beach on Sunday that left 12 people dead and 29 others injured.
Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney called for prayer and the intercession of the Virgin Mary in the immediate aftermath of the Dec. 14 shooting, which authorities said included one of the alleged gunmen among the dead.
“As we follow the horrific news coming from this evening’s shooting at Bondi Beach, let us pray for those who have been killed or injured,” Fisher said in a statement released shortly after the attack. “May Our Lady, Queen of Peace, intercede for all affected, and for our beloved city at this time.”
The archbishop also offered prayers for the “many who were forced to run for their lives” and for emergency service workers responding at the scene.
Continued below.
![]()
Sydney archbishop urges prayer after deadly attack leaves 12 dead at Bondi Beach Hanukkah event
Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher and Bishop Conference President Timothy Costelloe call for prayer after a terrorist attack leaves at least 12 people dead.www.catholicnewsagency.com
Ah! Thanks for the clarification.No, what I'm saying is that you had replied to my reply to another user. And that user was conveying something different than what you were conveying. I didn't mean that you (individually) were providing mixed messages.
I think we have to recognize some nuances.
For sure, "...He removes kings, and sets up kings...."
That does not imply those kings are performing God's moral edicts given for His people to follow. It means kings and nations are merely God's means toward His eventual just, good, and eternal end.
Your point is correct, but in this discussion it raises the question of "What difference does that make?" with regard to how Christians respond to them. If we were to presume that it was actually Satan who put those rulers in place, we'd also have to say, "God allowed Satan to do so?"
So, what difference does it make in terms of our response to the dictates of those kings?
To the extent that those kings give commands that coincidentally fall in line with God's commands to us...fine.
I can give an answer, though, to my own question: "What difference does it make?"
What Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2:13 command is that Christians avoid rebellion and unnecessary social contention. We don't dispute local authorities on some basis of, "You're not the boss of me!"
Like any diplomat posted to a foreign nation, we follow the local laws and to the greatest extent possible we avoid being designated persona non grata for mere reason of being churlish.
If you had not kept quoting my posts and answering something I was asking Apple Sky, we would have moved on ages ago.Ok let’s move on and give it a break ❤️
The Biden administration pushed as much toward a completely open border as they could get away with. Letting in 10 to 20 million people swamped our resources, the human trafficking skyrocketed to a level of slavery not seen since the civil war, 31% of the women who made the trip were sexually assaulted, only some of the children that went missing (62,000) have been rescued by this administration, many of them were in forced labor or sexual slavery, unvetted illegal criminals have committee horrible violent crimes, and more.
Really?What pretentious tripe!
But it was Jesus and the Apostles who told us if a prophecy was being fulfilled -you don't have that authority.I stand by how if a Prophecy can be literally fulfilled, then it will be.
(Nov 4th 2025)We are now 40 days from the Day when the Lord could send His fiery wrath.
(Nov 13th 2025.)30 days
Quoting 1 Corinthians 3:19 doesn’t refute this view. Paul is not condemning careful study of Scripture.1 Corinthians 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is folly with God. For it is written, “He catches the wise in their craftiness,”
Exactly. He resorts to calling it a "cult" to believe in this verse because he and the ECT doctrine falls apart with it. They know they have to add to this verse to fit their doctrine.BTW, I will not be bothered by any of them, since not one of them will invalidate John 3-16
“Chief bridge builder,” not “Priest king”, in some cases held by the Emperor, for example, Julius Caesar held the office at a young age, but not necessarily. Archbishops Leo, whose unprompted intervention at Chalcedon inadvertently contributed to the schism between the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, was the first of many Roman archbishops to use this title(they took the title of Pope, previously used exclusively by the Popes of Alexandria such as St. Alexander, St. Athanasius the Pillar of Orthodoxy and St. Cyril the Great, in the sixth century) including St. Gregory Diologos, whose Orthodox status is unquestioned.
The fact that Manuel I Komnenos may have claimed descent from St. John does not make it the case; all Orthodox sources I have agree St. John the Beloved Disciple was one of three members of the twelve who was celibate and unmarried, the others being his brother St. James the Great, and St. Thomas “the Twin” the Apostle to Edessa, Seleucia-Cstesiphon and India.
So thus far you’re proposing a “bloodline” from a celibate Christ to a celibate Apostle to the heir of the Byzantine Empire who was a member of the illustrious Komnenos dynasty, which was alas not the only dynasty to reign in Constantinople and not likely related to St. Constantine in any real sense; as far as heredity to Emperors before St. Constantine or St. Constantine’s heretical sons like Constantius, and Julian the Apostate (whose name is particularly apt in that he left Arianism to embrace neo-Platonism, which is to jump from tne frying pan into the fire, eschatologically, since the Arians deny Christ as the Incarnation of God and the latter deny him altogether, a bit like those driven by the modern day Jehovah’s Witnesses cult into atheism).
Still unproven assumption. You are only restating your definition here.False as the day is long. You continue in your notion of man as prime mover in his deeds.
- False that man is the prime mover in his deed. So I am not able to make my own choice.
Same. Still assuming the one necessarily means the other. You've proven nothing here.You indeed do WILL to do what you do, and that, by what you deem more advantageous or desirous.
- You will do what you do...by what you deem more more advantageous or desirous. Now I am the prime mover after all, therefore now my initial statement is true and somehow I can make my own choice..
They contradict only if you assume that choice by definition makes the chooser the prime mover.You choose according to your inclinations.
- Again I am making a choice according to my inclinations. Further solidifying that my initial position is true.
So the second two sentences contradict the first.
Wrong. But at least a small change in subject. That's refreshing.I am not disputing cause. I am disputing the logical incoherence that causing something that you know the result of can result in any effect that is not pre-determined, and if it is pre-determined then it is logically incoherent to suggest that anyone besides the causer has any choice.
C. You will choose because you must. You cannot avoid it. And God knows what you will choose— knew it before the foundation of the world. Argue against the Bible, if you will: Have you not heard of the Biblical term, "the elect"? Do you think the "Bride of Christ" is a haphazard compilation of indeterminate members?Oh, but you are making a claim. You just don't realize it.
Which is it? A or B?
A. I have a choice whether to follow God.
B. God already knows whether I will choose to follow him or not.
TrueIf God knows that I will follow him, then there is no reality where I will not follow him.
Also true.Conversely if he knows I will not follow him, then there is no reality where I do follow him.
Not at all. Both are true statements. It is only logical nonsense that both would happen at the same time in the same way.You cannot say both, because to quote from you, it is logical nonsense.