• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Average consumer now carries $6,329 in credit card debt. 'People are stretched,' expert says

Correct, and the fixtures represent the decade, not individual years
Those individual years are part of that decade.
Because you misinterpreted the figures?
No
Upvote 0

Although I don't believe this apparently scientists believe life formed on its own

But we will still have a body, not a conscious mind without a body.
This is a false equivelance. Your assuming its the exact same as our state now. It will not be. If it was then we will still be in a fallen state. The fact that we never get sick, suffer or die is fact its not the same. So stop making false comparisons.

But this is not the only way in which early Christians understood the Mind and Body divide. They clearly understood that this physical world was different to the spirit. That the physical world was different to their spiritual knowledge and selves.
Atheism v. theism is never the issue. Those discussions are about the Bible and creationists interpretation of it. Period. The evidence demanded is for the biblical account, not the existence of God.
But the biblical account demands belief in supernatural ideas. This is when the material atheists or anyone who uses science to beat down God or the bibles stories as unreal and make believe. Theres no difference.

Its still a material paradigm claiming an epistemic and ontological truth by demanding we show evidence. Otherwise its all rubbish. That is the very aim of skeptics when they come onto Christian forums lol. To make the delusion believers enlightened so they can get over their delusion of God and creationism lol.
That headline was created by a biblical creationist. It's a misrepresentation of science not written by a scientist. It is not what scientists believe.
But its not a misrepresentation of how some use science and naturalism to defeat those who believe in Gods creation. I guarentee skeptics are coming to show how the science is superior and shows that God is not needed for creating life. Thats the who idea on threads like this lol.

Its philosophical in nature and not a misrepresentation. It is exactly highlighting that when it comes down to argueing the case its a matter of belief and not science.
I have no idea what you are talking about. It makes no sense either from a theological or a scientific point of view.
If you have no idea about what I am talking about then I suggest you do some research because this is actually fairly well known within the philosophy of science. Ever heard of Kuhn. Surely you must have.

Naturalism and Science

Thomas Kuhn's concept of paradigms, introduced in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, revolutionized the philosophy of science by proposing that scientific progress isn't linear but occurs through revolutionary "paradigm shifts," where an established worldview (paradigm) is replaced by a new one, challenging the idea of pure objectivity and highlighting the community's role in defining scientific truth.

Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

That’s not what you said and you know it.


You said He “became” the Lord of The Sabbath when He has always been Lord of the Sabbath, as it is the holy day of the Lord, thus saith the Lord Isa58:13. Let’s not place our words in His mouth. He doesn’t not need our help and ask us not to Pro30:6
You don’t get it do you?

“Jesus said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of Man is Lord, even of the Sabbath.””
‭‭Mark‬ ‭2‬:‭27‬-‭28‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

The sabbath is made for man, Jesus is a man, now Jesus, as both God and man (the Son of man), is Lord of the sabbath. Jesus could not have been Lord of the sabbath until He became man and fulfilled the law.
Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

Not one translation uses Jesus “became” the Lord of the Sabbath. Adding “became” to God’s Holy Word, when its clearly not there, is making Jesus into the creation, instead of the Creator of the Sabbath and everything else Exo20:11, what He says He is Lord of the Sabbath.

New International Version
So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

New Living Translation
So the Son of Man is Lord, even over the Sabbath!”

English Standard Version
So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

Berean Standard Bible
Therefore, the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

Berean Literal Bible
So then, the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath."

King James Bible
Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.

New King James Version
Therefore the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath.”

New American Standard Bible
So the Son of Man is Lord, even of the Sabbath.”

NASB 1995
“So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

NASB 1977
“Consequently, the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

Legacy Standard Bible
Consequently the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

Amplified Bible
So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath [and He has authority over it].”

Christian Standard Bible
So then, the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Therefore, the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

American Standard Version
so that the Son of man is lord even of the sabbath.

Contemporary English Version
So the Son of Man is Lord over the Sabbath."

English Revised Version
so that the Son of man is lord even of the sabbath.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
For this reason the Son of Man has authority over the day of worship."

Good News Translation
So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath."

International Standard Version
Therefore, the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath."

NET Bible
For this reason the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath."

New Heart English Bible
Therefore the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath."

Webster's Bible Translation
Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.

Weymouth New Testament
so that the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath."
Is Jesus not Lord of the Sabbath?
Upvote 0

Christmas and Legalism

Thank you for your reply Robban. However what if being pressurized to participate in things they don't want to is making some people unhappy? God Bless :)

Well, that is a new one on me :) .

I have spent Christmas in different countries and in the Atlantic and never noticed anyone moping over it.

Paid time off, working? Double pay, whatever could go wrong, But each to their own.
Upvote 0

God’s Politics

Nah, My point is we might vote for someone with reluctance and even regret. A vote does not mean we support and endorse everything they stand for.
But maybe it does mean that we are more responsible to hold them accountable when they betray our values .
  • Agree
Reactions: mark46
Upvote 0

144k & Who They Are

My understanding.....

Revelation uses numbers in two main ways to make symbolic points.
First, there's Biblical Numerology, which is just spotting the consistent, traditional meaning of numbers used all through the Bible. These numbers are metaphors in themselves! For example, 7 is always shorthand for perfection or divine completion, and 12 means God's people (like the 12 tribes or 12 apostles). So, when you see the 144,000, it's not a literal census count; it's a perfect symbolic team: 12 (God's people) \times 12 (completeness) \times 1,000 (fullness/vastness) = the entire, perfectly sealed number of the redeemed. That's pure symbolism!
Second, you have Gematria, which is a little different and acts more like a secret code. It's when a number is used as a numerical key to unlock the name of a person or thing. The best example is 666. To the original readers, adding up the numerical values of the Greek or Hebrew letters in "Neron Caesar" would equal 666, making it a very pointed, coded nickname for the ultimate human persecutor. So, 144,000 is a metaphor for completeness, while 666 is a code for an individual tyrant.
We agree Rev makes many symbolic points. Having said that, your reply leaves no room for any literal interpretations.

The OP made no reference to 666. So, I'll leave that rabbit hole for another discussion thread.

Literal vs symbolic scripture's examples:

This verse ALL literal
Rev 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; & every eye shall see him, & they also which pierced him: & all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen

This verse symbolic
Rev 1:14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;
(NOTE: NOT wool or snow or a flame. BUT: "like wool" "as snow" "as a flame". We must pay close attention, CONTEXT is always KEY.

Rev text often announces symbolism with phrases like: sign, like or as, I saw, having the appearance of, which represents or which is...

Examples: Rev 12:1: "A great sign appeared in heave", "a woman". Rev 13:2: The beast "was like" "a leopard". When text signals a symbol we should interpret symbolically.

In Rev, #'s tied to counts of people or time are consistently literal.

Examples: 7 churches, 7 seals, 7 trumpets, 7 bowls, 42 months, 1,260 days, 12 TRIBES, 12K from each tribe etc...

Rev cites literal places. Examples: Jerusalem, Euphrates, Armageddon, Patmos, Zion etc. Unless symbolic its noted. Example: Rev 11:8. "spiritually" called Sodom & Egypt.

When Rev cites earthly judgments, they are literal. Examples: earthquakes literal, darkness literal, famine literal, plagues literal, war literal etc...

When symbolic is signaled, interpret symbolically. If not, interpret literally.

How this applies to the 144k. John gives numbers → literal tribes, literal names, literal genealogical bloodline categories. When no symbolic signal given → interpret literally!

So again I submit the 144k mentioned in Rev 7 & 14 are literal OT Israelites. Men redeemed from the earth, a firstfruits/resurrection wave soul harvest offering made unto The Father & Son. Amen
Upvote 0

Do the Ten Commandments apply to Christians today?

No verse before EX 20 says "do not take God's name in vain"
Mark 2:27 Jesus speaks of the making of BOTH the Sabbath AND mankind in Gen 1-2
Not what I asked. And again you cannot prove that the wicked that died during Noah did not take Gods name in vain. Read verse 28. Jesus became the Lord of the Sabbath.
Turns out God existed before Moses and God said Abraham "kept my commandments".
What commandments? Show me the verse that contains the list of commandments before Moses? How about the 4th commandment, did anyone keep it before Moses?
The only reason "creation WEEK" is a 7 day week is because of Gen 2:1-3 the SEVENTH day of that week that Ex 20:11 says was the actual SABBATH being made, blessed, sanctified.
Nonsense. No one read Genesis or Exodus before the 15th century BCE.
Pretty hard to miss.
Only if you read it outside of historical context as you are doing.
Upvote 0

Judge dismisses James Comey and Letitia James cases, finding prosecutor's appointment invalid

Come the Tish allegations, since that what they just are. The insurance lawyer who stepped in to replace the AG, who quit after refusing to bring charges seeing there were no charges to bring, is failing to make her case for the third time. I already showed you how both cases in Va and NY how those claims are bogus.

Lindsay Halligan didn't replace an AG (attorney general), of which there's only one, which is currently Pam Bodi. Halligan was brought in to replace the Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, a lower position. Maybe this is pedantic, but I think it's worth noting.

However, I do not believe the second and third indictments were brought by Halligan. She brought the first, which got dismissed because (correctly, according to my understanding) a judge ruled she hadn't been properly appointed, and since she was the only one who signed onto the indictment, it couldn't fall to another prosecutor. So it wouldn't make any sense to have her go and do it a second time.

This article (by Andrew McCarthy, which argues that both James's case against Trump and Trump's case against James are absurd and partisan) says that the second was brought by a guy named Roger Keller, who unlike Halligan actually has prosecuted cases before. A bit odd that the newbie managed to get an indictment while the actual prosecutor failed, but Halligan might've just lucked out on the grand jury selection. I don't think we know who brought the third indictment--we don't actually have a formal record of any rejection, the information about it is just from "anonymous sources familiar with the proceedings". If it was rejected we'll find out soon enough, but for now we don't know who it was. But it probably wasn't Halligan given, again, that would most likely just get it dismissed again by a judge, so they need someone else to do it.
Upvote 0

Tim Walz Vows to Bring More Somalis to Minnesota, Despite Growing Fraud Scandal Reaching Into the Billions

The Somalian fraud and tribalism was going on long before Trump. That is what happens when you import the third world into your country in mass, give them welfare to make them comfortable, and have zero expectation for them to assimilate. They bring they bring the third world with them and replicate it where they are.
What is third world about this fraud scheme? Because fraud is as old as commerce and plenty of it existed here long before any Somalis immigrated. These were business owners ( not welfare recipients) taking advantage of a program that was not well regulated. Also, the Fraud was not limited to Somali owned businesses.
Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

notice the "please don't keep the Sabbath, Sabbath is not for mankind" language is entirely missing from the following
And yet all of the “evidence@ you posted so far show that the sabbath is celebrated on Sunday by the churches.
You can't simply imagine your case... you have to make one.
I’ve been making one here for quite some time. Tell me, can you post a verse where the sabbath was kept before Moses? Can you show a post resurrection verse that teaches that the church has to keep the sabbath? Can you post a verse that shows that the law was given to the gentiles collectively?
My church is the church of 1 Cor 7:19 "what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God"
Rom 3:31 "do we then make VOID the Law of God by our faith? God forbid! In fact we establish the Law"
Rev 14:12 "the saints KEEP the commandments of God AND their faith in Jesus"
No. Your church is the legalist church that requires works of the law for salvation. Can you be saved if you don’t keep the sabbath?

False. My ability to show that the Bible refutes your little quips is key to this discussion.
Your ability to repeat accusations is of course, impressive, however transparent.
How? Your “evidence” is no evidence at all. You thought that you had an aha moment but you did not. The confessions that you posted said that the Christian is not under the law and the sabbath is on Sunday. Can you prove otherwise?
sadly you did not prove anything. I agree that the Bible exists, it is the Word of God and saints are called to obey the word of God, not as a means of salvation but as the fruit of salvation.

Rom 8:4-9 states clearly that the lost are at war with God and His law. Have you read it?
But your church and you add works to the salvation formula. What do you think Paul means when he states:

“Therefore there is now no condemnation at all for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭8‬:‭1‬-‭4‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Is the law strong? Does the law benefit us? Do we walk according to the law or according to the Spirit?
having differences in POV is nothing new on this board but as we have seen the major Christian confessions of faith refute your rejection of God Commandments. Your only solution is to ignore them even after you yourself asked me to post a few of them for you. just does not get any easier than this for readers to see the issues plainly.


This is again a Strawman. I have never rejected God’s commandments. You continue to misrepresent my argument. Here let me explain it one more time. The Ten Commandments were repeated into Jesus two commandments except for the 4th commandments which Jesus fulfilled by becoming the Lord of the sabbath and our Christian rest. There, can you stop misrepresenting my argument?
One of the very few places where you and I agree.
But we don’t agree. You and your church teach a faith plus works of the law salvation because you and your church believe that sabbath keeping is required for salvation. As long as you believe that we will never agree.
We see "EVERY Sabbath" gospel preaching and worship services explicitly to both gentiles and Jews in Acts 18:. This has been repeated for you several times and your only solution is to ignore it.

Just like your only solution to the main text of section 19 in the Westminster and Baptist Confessions of faith has been to ignore what it says.
The confessions do not say what you claim. I even posted the parts related to the sabbath but you ignored them. You can’t just force something to say what you want,
Jesus always was the Lord of the Sabbath. You need to read more. Heb 8 says it is Jesus in Exodus 20 speaking the TEN.
It isn’t. Nothing in Heb 7 that stated ad such. Exodus 20 relates to the law given to Israel not to the church.
Read more, quip less to make a good compelling case.

Nothing says "Jesus became the Lord" of some part of God's Law because Jesus IS God, He is the Law giver as Heb 8 points out in regard to Sinai. This is why all the confessions of faith that I showed to you (and more also) affirm this point about the TEN
Jesus became Lord of the Sabbath. Scriptures is clear about that, is it not?
read more.

When you see Bible texts that go against your preferences you call it "theological drama"? Seriously?
Yes seriously. Go back and read your posts.
That has been true since Adam.

Rev 1 Jesus was slain "from the foundations of the world".

Gal 1:6-9 there has only been one gospel
Gal 3:8 the Gospel was preached to Abraham
And yet God did not give the 4th commandment to Abraham. Why is that?
The protoevangelium is in Gen 3.

You need to read more
Is it now? Why do t you post it. While you are at it why don’t you post a verse that shows that the sabbath was kept before Moses? How about a verse that shows that the law was given to the gentiles collectively?
Upvote 0

Ilhan Omar blasted over resurfaced comments on Somali influence in the US as Elon Musk suggests she committed treason

For it to be a conspiracy, the number of items the Trump administration has completed is amazing.


People (sometimes) successfully fighting back against his dictator tendencies and actions to keep the balance of power and our government in check doesn't mean he's not trying to assume power not typically bestowed upon American presidents.
For all the complaints I don't see the US in some dictatorship. Some of the ideas like anti abortion and Trans is not Project 25. Especially Trans ideology as this was dividing society and denying long held womens rights. BUt nothing bad is happening. Yet we had actual bad stuff happen under Biden and no one is complaining about that.
The democratic process was not bypassed to promote Harris. The DNC followed their policies to elect someone at the last minute. The DNC electors had people who submitted their intent to run with the required signatures and they were voted on. Not everyone voted for Harris via a virtual roll call. She was also not the only one with delegates, but the others did not have enough to win.
People were expecting a 50 state primary all over again. That's not what happens. There was also not time for it as deadlines had passed in all the states and my state of Ohio was threatening not to have the dem candidate on the ballot at all if not submitted by a certain date. They were unwilling to provide exceptions granted to candidates in the past, including GOP candidates.

See Adoption of early virtual nomination vote here.


The GOP would have had to do something similar had they lost their nominee at the last minute.
Ok well I see differering opinion on this

Democratic Party’s choice of Harris was undemocratic − and the latest evidence of party leaders distrusting party voters

But there would not have been a rush if the had admitted Bidens health instead of gas lighting the nation. Thats was all part of the undemocratic way in which they operated.
People do not need to abandon their entire culture to assimilate.
No but they need to become Americans and part of that culture and not be dividing the nation with anti western and American ideas. The current trend of the Left is towards socialism and cultural Marxism. The ideas and policies are clear.
The cultures of other melding into what is America is what makes us rich as a nation. No one is asking Jews to abandon their ceremonies. We have little Chinatowns all over this country. Little Cubas. Little Italies. Mormons. Amish. Native Americans. People who keep traditions alive. We are all the better for it.
Yes thats how it has always been. But not now. We never had such instablity as now with all the culture wars. THis was brought on by radical Left ideas of white America verses the other with all the language and narratives pushed. This is now admitted fact.

Nevermind project 25. The reality of the mess Left by the last administration is clear and needs to be corrected. Thats not any deviate plan but a reaction (perhaps overly so in some cases) to bad policies and radical ideology that has destroying the US.

Theres a massive difference between regulated immigration that is integrated and flooding a nation with an open border and unvetted illegals who are not causing economic and social chaos. That was actively pushed as part of policiy.
Upvote 0

Christmas and Legalism

Hello!

I was talking with a lady who has recently lost her husband, she reports being under intense peer pressure, which she thought was a form of legalism, to do silly stuff she doesn't want to do. Specifically regarding trees/decorations/turkeys and the like. She said she hates this time of year, wishes it was over and that people would stop pressurizing her. I agreed with her, at this time of year there is pressure to do things you don't want to do from other Christians. Maybe well meaning people, sometimes maybe trying to make conversation, but I find it rather wearing. Pressure and competition, I detect a lot of people are trying doing this stuff as a form of oneupmanship. Like the guy who needs a bigger tree and more glowing gnomes and Odins in their garden than the person next door.

Leaving aside the possible pagan origins of much of this stuff is it Biblical to pressure people to do something they don't want to do? There's no biblical command telling us to put up a 'Christmas Tree', or to take a present from a man dressed as Santa aka Odin at a church party, or to sings songs about flying deer. Or forcing someone to wear a Santa hat or an Elf hat when they don't want to (yes, in a previous year I was forced to wear an elf hat to participate as a helper at a church event). Why then are people pressured into doing this if they don't want to? Isn't it a form of legalism? Being forced to partake in possible Paganism in Church? I detect churches are more likely to have a Santa and a tree than a nativity scene.

It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery (Galatians 5:1).

I have been told that's it's a form of legalism to tell people not to engage in certain activities, so why then isn't it legalism to compel people to engage in those activities?

I have been told that it would be legalism to acknowledge various Old Testament Biblical Feasts or to encourage others to do so. Why then isn't it Legalism to compel others to revere a flying fat all knowing midget from the North pole?

For those who don't think churches could revere demons or compel others to do so, there's 'Tuesday' for example. A day of the week named to honour a pagan god of war. Wednesday, Thursday and Friday are the same. Living in a pagan world aren't we meant to be aware of the devil's schemes, rather then going along with anything and everything, afterall Satan masquerades as an angel of light.

God Bless All :) and happy Christmas. Hope you find a time of peace and joy in remembering the Saviour's birth and please don't take my post as critical or judgemental. I'm asking Qs from a place of frustration is all.

Chanukah 2025 begins Sunday evening Dec 14.

I am so tired and weary I have fallen asleep at least three times today,

so there will be no candle lighting for me, in case I fall asleep.

Chanukah is a celebration of the miracle where one jar of oil enough for one day, lasted eight days.

As for Christmas time, it is also a time of lights across the road from me the
council have put up a giant Christmas tree full of lights.

It breaks up the darkness.

If it makes people happy, why not?
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,702
Messages
65,437,435
Members
276,448
Latest member
Simple Dan