Latest activity

JPPT1974 · 2025-11-30T00:43:54-0600

JPPT1974's Tues Thoughts 12/2/2025:
World is really in need in
Humility and humbleness and
Really when we think about
Others who don't have the
Means and resources as we
Need to do all we can to really
Give time, resources, and means.

JPPT1974 · 2025-11-30T00:42:59-0600

JPPT1974's Mon Thoughts 12/1/2025:
We need to really know
It is not about us but
About others and when we
Give and not think about ourselves
As there are other people that
Don't have the resources and means
However when we place Christ in our lives
Front and center, it changes our mindset.

JPPT1974 · 2025-11-30T00:41:59-0600

This is the world
It is about me, me, me
But it should be about
Others and everybody as
You see there is a saying
It is better to give than to
Receive and to think of others
Loving our neighbors as ourselves.

JPPT1974 · 2025-11-30T00:41:09-0600

When we realize that we
Need to not at all in
Acted as self-entitled and self-privileged
Thinking that we are or earn
Merits on our own but
Really they are not on our
Own and when we acknowledge
Jesus is the real true reason.[/COLOR]

Apple Sky · 2025-11-30T00:41:08-0600

prodromos said:
Just as the heavens are a spiritual realm and not something physical, it stands to reason that the "bottomless pit" is also not a physical realm but a spiritual reality.

I suppose the sun, moon and all the stars are just a spiritual reality too.

JPPT1974 · 2025-11-30T00:40:11-0600

JPPT1974's Weekend Thoughts Black Friday:
We live in a world
That it is about being
Self-entitled and self-privileged
As much as really don't want to
Really admit it but it's true
But it is how we need to
Contrary act that was as
We are Christian believers!

FaithT · 2025-11-30T00:23:29-0600

Christworshiper said:
Thank you so much and I will get it blessed soon.

It’s beautiful!

Nithavela · 2025-11-30T00:13:09-0600

Arcangl86 said:
So, unless the pardon has restrictions attached to it, once it's issued it's permanent. But what I think Trump is attempting to do is say they were never valid in the first place. There is absolutely no legal precedence to retroactively voiding the actions of a President due to alleged incapacity, but that's true of many things this administration is trying.

He'll just have the DOJ throw anyone into the slammer that he pleases and there's nothing you can do about it.

JohnClay · 2025-11-30T00:08:30-0600

CoreyD said:
That is a good question.

What do you think of Jesus; words here... Matthew 12:41, 42; Luke 10:13-15; Luke 11:31, 32

I wasn't sure but this is what copilot said:

These passages emphasize that on Judgment Day, Jesus will be the ultimate judge, and past examples of repentance (Nineveh, Queen of Sheba) or rejection (Chorazin, Bethsaida, Capernaum) will stand as witnesses against those who refuse to recognize him. They highlight that Jesus is greater than Jonah and Solomon, and that failure to repent in his presence carries heavier consequences than past generations faced.

Arcangl86 · 2025-11-30T00:07:10-0600

Nithavela said:
I would ask if one can seriously un-pardon people, but Trump can do anything and nobody will stop him.

So, unless the pardon has restrictions attached to it, once it's issued it's permanent. But what I think Trump is attempting to do is say they were never valid in the first place. There is absolutely no legal precedence to retroactively voiding the actions of a President due to alleged incapacity, but that's true of many things this administration is trying.

Landon Caeli · 2025-11-30T00:01:03-0600

Nithavela said:
You're thinking to small. From Venezuela, you could start land grabbing the entire subcontinent of South America. It's easy to conquer and hold, with only a connection to North Africa and Central America, and you'll get two additional reinforcements per turn.

I'm really starting to like you.

Nithavela · 2025-11-29T23:58:03-0600

Landon Caeli said:
Well, Greenland and Gaza Strip went down the drain. With Venezuela, we can put the heat on the Panama Canal, for a double whammy.

You're thinking to small. From Venezuela, you could start land grabbing the entire subcontinent of South America. It's easy to conquer and hold, with only a connection to North Africa and Central America, and you'll get two additional reinforcements per turn.

Landon Caeli · 2025-11-29T23:53:50-0600

Nithavela said:
Of course it is. You got that huge, expensive army. Might as well use it to plunder the world.

Well, Greenland and Gaza Strip went down the drain. With Venezuela, we can put the heat on the Panama Canal, for a double whammy.

Nithavela · 2025-11-29T23:52:00-0600

I think this is beautiful. As the USA is poised to invade Venezuela, this is the kind of thread that REALLY gets people talking.

The culture war is one of the greatest political moves of the century.

rjs330 · 2025-11-29T23:49:53-0600

Stopped_lurking said:
I've explicitly talked about the difference in this post. There is a loss of specificity though.

No you havent. You have used the word gender at times and I have used the word sex for the exact same thing. Thats because they are the exact same thing.

Stopped_lurking said:
Who said it was? I just wanted to show that chromosomes are not perfect markers for sex.

They are the markers of what is normal. That is why we can determine what is abnormal. Just like normal humans have two arms and two legs. But sometimes we have people born who do not have any number of those. However they are still human beings with a birth defect. They are not the norm for the species. Defects in genetics do not determine the norm. And this particular discussion is NOT about genetic defects. It is about transgenderism.

And the syndrome you mentioned has nothing to do with that. So I won't bother responding to that argument anymore becauae it is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

Which is transgenderism.

Nithavela · 2025-11-29T23:44:02-0600

Landon Caeli said:
Why not stop beating around the bush, and call it a full scale conquest. You know it is.

Of course it is. You got that huge, expensive army. Might as well use it to plunder the world.

rjs330 · 2025-11-29T23:41:40-0600

Stopped_lurking said:
It is widely used to differentiate whether the connection

I think it can be both. I still don't see how it shows the difference between gender and sex.

Stopped_lurking said:
different category than the connection between gender and fashion. That is why some find it useful to use different words.

Sure, but the words mean the same thing. Gender and fashion is the same thing as sex and fashion. Thats why gender means sex and sex means gender.

Stopped_lurking said:
See above.

See above.

Stopped_lurking said:
What gender they are.

Thats because sex and gender are the same thing. After all the observations you determine quickly that the person is a male or female. When you determine they are a male you have determine ed their sex AND gender at the same time.

rjs330 · 2025-11-29T23:30:18-0600

iluvatar5150 said:
Would you like me to paint you guys with such a broad brush?

I think the researchers and the university in the OP painted us white people wi t h it. And you don't seem to have a problem with it. I guess broad brushing is okay as long as you are doing it to white people.

Postvieww · 2025-11-29T23:18:58-0600

Akita Suggagaki said:
Trespassing on government property during congressional session. Breaking the law. No excuse.

Placing two pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC was breaking the law as well and nobody shot her.

Postvieww · 2025-11-29T23:16:53-0600

Pommer said:
President Trump was “the ‘real victim’!” on January 6?
I see.

Not what I said ! Trump was a victim of unnatural hatred throughout his entire presidency.

Postvieww · 2025-11-29T23:13:08-0600

NxNW said:
She was trying to assassinate the Vice President and Speaker of the House.

There is no truth in that statement. You have absolutely no evidence she was trying to assassinate anyone.

9Rock9 · 2025-11-29T23:07:20-0600

Pavel Mosko said:
A little bit. I find Wesley interesting because he had some of the earliest interest in something that we Eastern Christians refer to as Theosis, that is sort of just being discovered by some contemporary Evangelicals in recent times.

Login to view embedded media

He also has a more positive take on tradition when it comes to theology, than most Protestants, especially Evangelicals (some Magisterial Protestants like Lutheran's, Anglicans and some Calvinists are kind of decent with that too).

I also know some of his heritage did help contribute to other movements like Pentecostalism.

I know this an old thread and my reply is late, but yeah, I think I agree.

I am drawn to tradition and more spiritual aspects of the Christian faith, but still consider myself Protestant because I don't want forsake the plain teachings of Scripture.

I find both Lutheranism and Wesleyan-Holiness traditions to have a nice balance.

GodDoesListen55 · 2025-11-29T23:00:11-0600

More of what?

rjs330 · 2025-11-29T22:55:14-0600

Stopped_lurking said:
So how is fashion connected to genitalia or chromosomes or gamete size?

I've already explained that. I dont need to do it again.

Brightfame52 · 2025-11-29T22:50:59-0600

zoidar said:
The logical problem with Jesus only dying for the elect is you need to know you are of the elect before you can trust in Christ. IOW if you don't know Jesus died for you, how can you then trust in him? But Calvinism solves this illogically, saying if you do trust in Christ, he died for you, but that is no solution to the problem. It all seems theologically upside down.

This post is about the saving effects of the death of Christ.

Latest activity

Latest activity

Filter

Forum statistics

Share this page