Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
curbing the runaway inflation
Welcome back!Hello there! Im new here myself so I am trying g to get used to being back on forums. I used to be part of a forum a long time ago, like 10-15 years ago. LOL its definitely been a while! But I came here to look for Christian fellowship and in hopes of making a new friend.
Agreed 100%.I’m amazed by how one’s priorities show themselves so easily. Faith can be manipulated by politics. So very distorted.
Jesus is the chief cornerstone, Jesus was referring to himself after Peters confession that Jesus was the Christ, the son of the living GOD. Its not the church of Peter. Isaiah 28:16 Psalm 118:22 Acts 4:11 1 Peter 2:6 The word used in Greek allows for the use of the word “but” Strongs G2532 . It makes no sense for anyone else but the messiah to be the rock. The church can’t be built on an ordinary man. When Jesus said, but upon this rock, he was referring to himself.Matthew 16:18-19 And I tell you, you are Peter,[a] and on this rock[b] I will build my church, and the powers of death[c] shall not prevail against it.[d] 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven,[e] and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” RSVCE
Jesus and the Apostles spoke Aramaic. The name given to Simon Peter by Jesus is the Aramaic "Kepha," transliterated into "Cephas." "Kepha" means "Rock" in Aramaic. This Aramaic name is preserved within the Koine Greek Biblical text. Thus Jesus said "You are Rock and on this Rock I will build my Church." That is, Jesus used Rock twice in the same sentence. Had Jesus wished to show what you contend he simply could have said "I am Jesus and on this Rock I will build my Church." God renaming someone, such as Abram to Abraham, often comes at an important moment in Biblical history.
Yes it is mystical. Just like how Gods spirit works. Paul calls it a mystery. But its real. The reason we humans have been preoccupied with this for all our existence and it will never fade. Is that its real. Its a real part of being human and there is some truth to this mysterious realm existing in one form or another.As to what this alternative to natural science is you invoke the vaguery of "deeper knowledge" and mystical experiences with the adept gibberish of a New Age guru. Then...
The *PHYSICAL* process are just descriptions of what is happening. Nothing in that process tells us the nature of how that was caused. As some science tells us 'the *PHYSICAL* is just a reflection of something deeper such as Mind or Information. Like a Hologram or computer screen pixel.you invoke a series of *PHYSICAL* processes (acoustics, advanced machining, piezoelectric effects, chemical alterations) which are not only "material science" but as you immediately state:
So if someone claimed a miracle we could measure the physical effects and results of the healing. But how can you tell that this was not supernatural. Science only describes what is or has happened. It does not tells us the nature of how those things happened.As indeed it is. None of these thing are demonstrated and if you want to demonstrate them "material science" not New Age woo woo is the way to do so. Speaking of which, you conclude with several paragraphs of the alternatives to "natural science",
Actually its also mainstream science.that come straight of the poisoned tree of Helena Blevatsky. When you invoke these alternatives to natural science you sound less like a Christian and more like a refugee from the Theosophical Society.
Now you claim to be able to do my thinking lol.I don't doubt that.
Only a smidge, gee thanks. Is this an either/or fallacy.I see to (two) paths for you to retain a smidge of credibility with alternative Egyptology and history.
Except if we accept this then the out of place advanced tech is an anomely that breaches the gradual and reductive slow process of simple to complex.1. Embrace lost advanced civilization that has left few traces but did amazing things with their naturalistic advanced technology (in the same way that we have advanced naturalistic technology) and put aside all of the spiritual claims and attacks on "material science" regarding the ancient past.
This is definitely an either/or fallacy. What a strange category to put the options into of all possible alternatives. Almost as though its one of your possibilities rather than one that applies globally.2. Embrace the theosophical esoteric cosmology and claim the lost civilization was part of the 4th "root race" of humanity that built great monuments (for later civilizations like Egypt to find) using their technologies based on psychic powers and other supernatural magic.
No I agree with the experts. I am not doubting the science. I am saying that it only tells us so much and is not the complete picture. Like Marys direct experience of the color red.OR, you could just accept that the professionals know what they are talking about. (I'm not holding out for that.)
We’re the drug runners in a life boat?The Japanese were attacked by US forces because they were at war. They were a threat to American lives and their ship destroyed. Thirty nine survived the attack. Maybe you'd say that the situation with the drug runners was the same (you'd be wrong, but we'll assume that would be your view). So their boat was destroyed and two survived. For over an hour: US airstrike survivors clung to boat wreckage for an hour before second deadly attack, video shows
'Two men who survived a US airstrike on a suspected drug smuggling boat in the Caribbean clung to the wreckage for an hour before they were killed in a second attack, according to a video of the episode shown to senators in Washington.'
So this wasn't even a one-two strike. The boat was destroyed, most occupants were blown up and people watched two men struggling in the sea for over an hour. And then decided to kill them in cold blood. Trying to defend this is unconscionable.
I have mixed, complicated feelings. It’s not so black and white. ??? If that makes any sense.Why not? Don't you think that is important before judging?
Maybe they had good intentions and I don’t think they were being malicious.Why not? Don't you think that is important before judging?
Why not? Don't you think that is important before judging?I don’t know.
I don’t know.What did this Church think when they created this display? That is what makes this right or wrong.
What did this Church think when they created this display? That is what makes this right or wrong.That’s still wrong putting all political differences aside! As the old saying goes, two wrongs don’t make a right!
My opinion only!
For the record, I am pro-immigration and pro-refugee. We MUST love the less fortunate.I think that it is a powerful statement by this Church. Joseph and Mary fled Israeli with the baby Jesus. They were immigrants in a foreign land. ICE is arresting legals and illegals.
Should we act as Jesus or reject what he taught. Their statement says ICE would have arrested the holy family and imprisoned them and then deported them. I don't believe Jesus would agree with this administration.
The Japanese were attacked by US forces because they were at war. They were a threat to American lives and their ship destroyed. Thirty nine survived the attack. Maybe you'd say that the situation with the drug runners was the same (you'd be wrong, but we'll assume that would be your view). So their boat was destroyed and two survived. For over an hour: US airstrike survivors clung to boat wreckage for an hour before second deadly attack, video showsWere the drug runners in a life boat?
That’s still wrong putting all political differences aside! As the old saying goes, two wrongs don’t make a right!Did you say the same when Trump politicized Christianity when said that candidate Aftyn Behn hated Christians? Or when he looked to the sky and said, "I am the chosen one".
I have a card in my wallet that says that I’m Catholic and to call a priest in case of an emergency. I think I got it from Rugged Rosaries.The Register contacted pastors across the country asking the question whether emergency personnel call them to life-threatening situations. For the most part, the answer is No.
When a multi-ton pile of clay covered a steam-shovel fireman in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in early December 1952, a 40-year-old Catholic priest had himself lowered upside down into a hole workers had dug to try to save the man.
“Only the tips of the priest’s heels were visible as his murmured prayers were heard above,” The Boston Globe reported the next day. Only a portion of the man’s leg was visible when the priest first got near him, and by the time workers freed the rest of Elpidio Baia, a 55-year-old father of three, the accident victim had died. But Father John Tierney’s efforts to bring him the last rites of the Church are an example of what used to be common — police and firefighters calling a priest to an accident so he can administer sacraments to the critically injured.
Priests still frequently offer confession, Eucharist and anointing of the sick at hospitals, of course, but not so much at the scenes of accidents. The words “priest called to the scene” and similar phrases appeared in many news stories in the United States during the last century until the late 1960s, when they started tapering off, according to searches of online databases conducted by the Register.
It’s not common anymore.
Continued below.
![]()
‘Someone Call a Priest’: Sacraments at Time of Crisis Are Not Administered as Often as They Used to Be
The Register contacted pastors across the country asking the question whether emergency personnel call them to life-threatening situations. For the most part, the answer is No.www.ncregister.com