Lost tribes of Israel
- By jonojim1337
- History & Genealogy
- 439 Replies
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wow, that scandal seems like a bedtime fairytale compared to today's corruption.He did however put it into a blind trust during his presidency - which turned out to be only semi-blind.
WaPo:The story of Jimmy Carter’s peanut farm is a bit more complicated than you may have heard
In the years before his presidential run in 1976, day-to-day operations at the warehouse were managed by his brother, Billy Carter. Billy Carter would end up being a perpetual thorn in President Jimmy Carter’s side, a tendency which began even before Carter took the oath of office. During those years before the presidential bid, for example, Billy Carter took out loans from the National Bank of Georgia to expand warehouse operations — at a time which overlapped with a peanut drought. Those loans ultimately totaled $6.5 million, about $31 million today....“According to the plan announced today,” the New York Times reported, “Mr. Carter will sell all his personal stock, divert the royalties from his autobiography, ‘Why Not the Best?’ into a foundation that will establish a future library to house Presidential papers, and transfer to the trust his interest in Carter’s Warehouse and Carter Farms Inc.”“White House officials, arguing that the trust is ‘blind’ and that neither they nor Carter is informed its operations,” The Washington Post reported at the time, “said they could not explain the loss. However, White House Counsel Robert Lipshutz said it is probable that the loss involved transactions of the Carter family peanut warehouse business which represents a major share of the trust.”In February 1979, Kirbo had put the warehouse business on the market....That October, the special counsel, Curran, cleared anyone of wrongdoing in the bank loans investigation.“The special counsel said, ‘No evidence whatsoever was discovered that any monies were diverted from the warehouse into the campaign,' ” The Post reported. “As for whether any criminal charges were warranted, Curran said ‘the answer is also a clear no.’ ”...In March 1981, the need for the semi-blind trust gone, the warehouse company was sold to an Illinois feed company for $1.2 million.
I think it is ALWAYS to be understood as literal when a bad and faithless Catholic uses it to refer to himself or herself. Such people, by definition, are good and faithful Catholics just by saying so. Think Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi. Or, of course when someone receives the Eucharist from the hand of the pope. Those people are always good and faithful Catholics, even if they appear to be bad and faithless and scandalous Catholics by every measure.Just trying to break the definition of what a good and faithful Catholic means.
Thankyou, Lord, our God, for being our provider. Thankyou for providing medical input and medicines and corrective medicine. Mostly, God, thankyou for being over all and in all and for being near to us with all of the power of healing in our time of need. You alone are our source and in You alone do we trust! In Jesus' name. Amen.Sorry for making a duplicate thread but I figured the old thread was getting kind of full and I wasnt able to describe the whole situation and it was about my father in law passing away and I didnt want to change the topic about me.
Ok so here's whats going on.
Theres several things going on in my life right now. One, as you know my father in law passed away last Sunday and my wife and I are going from New York to Ohio for the funeral this Sunday and will be returning on the 10th. Two, ive been suffering many months with severe asthma and gasping for air at night thinking it was my sleep apnea at night when in reality it was my severe asthma. This gasping at night stumped my pulmonologist for many, many months he ran every test in the book and couldnt figure it out and meanwhile we tried every asthma treatment available for my asthma and nothing could provide relief long enough. Eventually we both together came up with the idea for a biologic so he ordered a blood test and when the results came back it turns out, I have eosinophilic asthma. For those who dont know what that is Its a very rare very severe form of asthma that definitely qualifies me for a biologic and medicaid approved the biologic in 2 days so very quickly.
Anyway, this afternoon I start my first dose of the biologic and ive been taking trelegy (an inhaler) for a few days now. Im hoping and praying they both give me some relief together because ive been suffering for many months. Just absolutely suffering and I need prayers on this. I also need prayers because when my wife and I get back from the funeral I will be prepping for 4 days (the 11th-to 14th) for a colonoscopy on the 15th so they can finally figure out why ive been constipated for decades and try to get that straightened out.
Oh and my psychiatrist just out me on caplyta yesterday and im being taken off of latuda slowly because I was concerned about my weight and caplyta is much easier on weight gain. Latudas been very helpful over the years but its been keeping me over 400 pounds so id rather not jeopardize my health to keep my sanity when other antipsychotics can help with my schizoaffective disorder a lot easier.
Anyway, thats whats going on keep me in your prayers and we can pray and hope together that everything works out. Thanks for your prayers and sorry again for the double post.
But talk of “requirements” and “instructions” tends to legalize an intimate encounter, a personal yet also communal sacred rite. Isn’t it counterproductive to require someone to celebrate. And yet encouraging someone to come can open a new life and hope for them.It's not a matter of teaching. Receiving the Eucharist at mass is following the instructions of Jesus to "do this." The Church, through the power granted by Jesus as per the Bible, makes minimal requirements of the faithful to attend mass, knowing how important it is.
He may not be himself a pedophile, but he does stand up for them and rapists.Okay. You are right. It is obvious that Trump is a pedophile and secretly loves pedophiles and will circumvent the rule of law to defend pedophiles and rapists. He isn't deporting them, he is giving them refuge and asylum to specifically to deny justice for the victims. There is no other way to explain it. Are you happy now?
www.mercurynews.com
Darn it! Foiled again by simply reading the article.Because it's missing the additional context that he was prisoner-swapped with Americans being wrongfully detained in China.
Pardoning Trump
If Biden pardoned Trump would that be received as a gesture of reconciliation or as an insult? Or worse yet, an attempt to ingratiate?www.christianforums.com
Nice, on a couple of levels.Thanks for including us on this signal chat.
I'll go with the judge and jury, thank you very much.Instead of what you say here, I think it's best if I go with the opinions of those scholars and experts over at the Hoover Institute.
Cheeze Whiz on Pop Tarts?It was a joke, those two are very ultra processed. I should've said Cheese Whiz, that would've been funnier. The simple rule is eat single ingredient foods. The ingredients of an apple are an apple for example. Along with if God didn't make it, don't eat it.
I think anyone with a Class D felony should get a automatic 5 year loss of gun rights ... if no other offenses during that time their gun rights restored.
An unusually large pileup of Second Amendment challenges has landed at the Supreme Court, which will consider taking up the cases behind closed doors Friday.
It would add to what is already a major term for gun rights. The justices previously agreed to hear two cases early next year that involve whether unlawful drug users can carry firearms and Hawaii’s gun permitting regime.
I have mixed feeling about these. I'll explain why.
Preface: Scotus can only evaluate what's presented to them and elevated to their court, not perfect world scenarios to make new legal stipulations.
Hawaii and similar states having a "may issue" permitting system.
The two sides of that coin, a person pays the application fees, spends money to dot all of the I's and cross all the T's, and then an issuing agency says "Nah, sorry, we're not going to give you a carry permit".
The flip side, an issuing agency has guys like this show up:
View attachment 374401View attachment 374402
"Hi, I passed the background check did the paperwork, the gremlins who live in my closet said I should carry a gun, rabbit skins feel nice don't they...anyway...can I have my permit please?"
...perhaps some discretion is a good thing in some instances.
On the "felon" stuff...I've long maintained that people with non-violent felonies (like cooking the books) are less of a public threat than a person with violent misdemeanors on their record, and shouldn't be denied the right of self defense. The problem is, SCOTUS has a narrow scope to work with to establish precedent and isn't involving that sort of nuance to make the distinction between violent and non-violent felonies, and I certainly don't want former armed robbers being legally licensed to carry.
As far as the drug users thing, that's also too broad. Despite marijuana being closer to alcohol on the "risk spectrum", its lumped in with PCP and heroin (federally), so SCOTUS striking down laws on behalf of some casual pot users could have the negative effect of allowing some hardcore drug users to get their hands on guns.
US veterans agency lost thousands of ‘core’ medical staff under Trump, records show
Departures are exacerbating existing shortages and creating ‘very unsafe’ conditions for patients, veterans and health workers say