Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So even in the OT:Leviticus 18:28 – the land can “vomit out” its inhabitants
Deuteronomy 28 – exile is a covenant sanction
This is a transfer of covenant status, not just leadership.Matthew 21:43
“The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.”
Jesus does not predict:Matthew 24:2
“Not one stone here will be left upon another.”
Paul deliberately expands the promise beyond Palestine.Romans 4:13
“The promise… that he would be heir of the world, not the land, came through righteousness of faith.”
The physical land was a shadow, not the final reality.Hebrews 11:9–16
The patriarchs sought “a better country, a heavenly one.”
After 70 AD:Hebrews 8:13
“What is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.”
That is a direct contrast with earthly Jerusalem.Galatians 4:26
“The Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.”
That statement:According to the New Testament, the land promise to Israel was tied to the old covenant and temple system, which Jesus fulfilled and which was judged and ended by 70 AD. Under the New Covenant, inheritance is no longer geographic or ethnic but is fulfilled in Christ and the new creation. Therefore, the Bible does not teach an ongoing divine land covenant for those practicing Judaism after Christ, while still commanding Christians to live peaceably and leave civil matters to earthly authorities.

This is not from Protzens own writing. From the source I believe you are using:I am going off the same article and it clearly says that Pierre Protzen had done tests. Just after his reference is linked it says "Even though their experiments have been able to shed some light on the techniques".
Because you referred to him. I asked questions about his view and implicitly why you referenced him.That clearly implies they had done tests to support their findings. In fact the author was referencing them as support that despite experiements being done by Protzen and Stella Nair questions still remained. He was using Protzen as a credible source. You referred to him as a credible source when you referred to him. Otherwise why refer to him.
You clearly perceive reality very differently to me.Evidence matters. In Biden's case, he clearly was sharp in 2020 when he completely outclassed Trump in debates, but was not so sharp in 2024. Democrats acted accordingly. When Trump began to show signs of cognitive decline, republicans just doubled down on supporting him. He's clearly having trouble keeping awake, often says things that a bright 6th grader would know are wrong, etc.
It's not a problem I have.I did no such thing. Quit being deceitful in here.
Now you've forgotten how to reply. Sigh.So what if I quoted one word, I still referred to your fatuity in that entire statement. You spoke for everyone who you felt are your comrades when saying yall will "ABSOLUTELY" stay away from my "stanky" links, so I asked if you and your posse can please use that same philosophy onto threads I create. Yep. Yall can ABSOLUTELY stay away from those too.![]()
Words are hard. Someday you will learn how to use them respectfully.I already told you that your word trickery can not work on me.

Yet, she also was surprised at 12 years old Jesus' reply, when they find him in the TempleI believes that through the Sacrifice of her Son, she was preserved from Original Sin. (This is confirmed by many early Church Fathers).
And as a result, she possessed preternatural gifts. So yes, she was well informed of Scripture.
DEI of course.Who to blame?
My ancestors came from Norway to the US And I went back for a visit as part of a job I had in the USI grew up in Norway, the opposite of the life for me in every way. I never complained.
What does that have to to with Jews, Muslims, or Norway??But I always wanted to live like jews or muslims for example, have girls on my lap and watch people sing.
Culture outside the Bible tends to have a lot of bad ideas. That is the world that we live in since the fall of Adam. The Gospel lifts fallen humanity above our sinful nature, above defective culture. 2 Cor 5 "If any is in Christ Jesus he is turned into a new creation"I realise I can`t fake believing in a god, so my dream can never be. When my niece was very young, she wanted us to watch a movie together, which we did, but the entire time I felt strongly pain. I think she didn`t give closeness, and her mother`s brother came in during the movie with a sexual undertone. God knows why, but it`s how Norwegians are, kinda ruined the entire thing. I know the world is slowly turning bad, so I shouldn`t expect to watch a movie together like that in peace.
Yes that is like being a pilot of an airplane and choosing to nose dive into the ground.Is it depressing to think that nothing good will ever happen in real life, and there`s no heaven no matter how much you pray?
That is untrue.His autopsy report suggest Floyd died of s fentynal overdose.
Doesn't look like this is accurate.No, only the brain-stem. Maybe 1 % of a brain in addition
I am not sure there is a MAGA without the conspiracy theories.Yeah. I, as a MAGA conservative, disavow and reject these conspiracy theories.
No, at this point, this is just a letter written by a moron.RIP States’ Rights
Although I agree that Revelation is primarily eschatological, I appreciate viewing it through the lens of revealing Jesus Christ. I find supremely excellent aspects of the person and work of Jesus Christ in the Revelation as much, or even more, than any other book of the Bible.Yes it went off since soteriology would be important to consider, yet reference to the book of Revelation is bringing up eschatology as that is the concern of that book, and if symbolism that it is full of leaves divisive ideas about eschatological sequences, it is not reliably understood about other subjects with having all that symbolism. In retrospect we will understand these things afterward. Universalism is not well supported biblically, neither is annihilationism. Afterlife is lasting as the same words in the Bible apply to relationship with God with the restoration, so justice that is fair will be for those others also lasting in the same way.