• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The auto-pen scandal is going to be massive

The question right now is who signs the pardons. Last time I checked, the President does. So the next question is, why did the President sign a pardon for someone he knows nothing about, and claims to know nothing about the situation.

Who made him sign that pardon, or....or.....*dun dun dun* WHO SIGNED IT FOR HIM? SCANDALOUS! Must be those machines!

...his sons?

NORAH O'DONNELL: This is a question about pardons. The Trump family is now perhaps more associated with cryptocurrency than real estate. You and your son-- your sons, Don Jr. and Eric, have formed World Liberty Financial with the Witkoff family.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Right.

NORAH O'DONNELL: Helping to make your family millions of dollars. It's in that context that I do wanna ask you about crypto's richest man, a billionaire known as C.Z. He pled guilty in 2023 to violating anti-money laundering laws.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Right.

NORAH O'DONNELL: Looked at this, the government at the time said that C.Z. had caused "significant harm to U.S. national security", essentially by allowing terrorist groups like Hamas to move millions of dollars around. Why did you pardon him?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Okay, are you ready? I don't know who he is. I know he got a four-month sentence or something like that. And I heard it was a Biden witch hunt. And what I wanna do is see crypto, 'cause if we don't do it it's gonna go to China, it's gonna go to-- this is no different to me than AI.

My sons are involved in crypto much more than I-- me. I-- I know very little about it, other than one thing. It's a huge industry. And if we're not gonna be the head of it, China, Japan, or someplace else is. So I am behind it 100%. This man was, in my opinion, from what I was told, this is, you know, a four-month sentence.

But this man was treated really badly by the Biden administration. And he was given a jail term. He's highly respected. He's a very successful guy. They sent him to jail and they really set him up. That's my opinion. I was told about it.


I said, "Eh, it may look bad if I do it. I have to do the right thing." I don't know the man at all. I don't think I ever met him. Maybe I did. Or, you know, somebody shook my hand or something. But I don't think I ever met him. I have no idea who he is. I was told that he was a victim, just like I was and just like many other people, of a vicious, horrible group of people in the Biden administration.

NORAH O'DONNELL: The government had accused him of "significant harm to U.S. national security"--

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: That's the Biden government.

NORAH O'DONNELL: Okay. Allowing U.S. terrorist groups to, you know, essentially move millions of dollars around. He pled guilty to anti-money laundering laws. That was in 2023. Then in 2025 his crypto exchange, Binance, helped facilitate a $2 billion purchase of World Liberty Financial's stablecoin. And then you pardoned C.Z. How do you address the appearance of pay for play?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Well, here's the thing, I know nothing about it because I'm too busy doing the other--

NORAH O'DONNELL: But he got a pardon--

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: I can only tell you that--


NORAH O'DONNELL: He got a pardon--

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Norah, I can only tell you this. My sons are into it. I'm glad they are, because it's probably a great industry, crypto. I think it's good. You know, they're running a business, they're not in government. And they're good-- my one son is a number one bestseller now.
Upvote 0

The Thing Most Sabbath Keepers Do not Talk About.

What would it matter what I post in reference to me when you are not even addressing or can't address the most basic things posted to you in reference to the Greek?
Because you have not addressed my post 502. After all it is suppose to be a two way conversation.
Lol Certificates, Diplomas and Degrees? I have my friend, but they are paper for display on a wall. More aptly though in a box.
Any one of them that make you a Greek scholar?
Man's wisdom is foolishness. Spiritual things are Spiritually discerned.
Naturally.
What good did it do the learned, when Jesus was here?
If you are going to argue hermeneutics and epistemology it would be nice to understand the finer points.
Upvote 0

Maine elects woman convicted of killing Canadian tourist to city council: ‘So broken’

The specific analogy was hiring a pedophile at a daycare, not hiring a pedophile at a construction site. Perhaps you didn't think this all the way through. A daycare has very specific relevance to a pedophile and that is the employment you chose to highlight. Equally, government has very specific relevance to corruption. Are you impling that the right, as represented by you, has a lack of understanding of the damage fraud and corruption does and the victims it leaves behind?
Right. When the morality of the left becomes absurd then so are the analogies. Your side defends crime. No thanks.
That "If" is carrying a lot of weight there; unfortunately, it has succumbed to the overload and collapsed in a stinky heap of falsity. I'm a bit curious as to your dismissive "just" here as though "crime" were not a serious thing (although there is certainly a spectrum).
What is wrong with the if. At least I gave you a way out which you did not take. You continue to dismiss the severity of murder.

Weird tangent that has nothing to do with either of our arguments - just a bash-the-left digression. Heck, I've known people who did this, that and the other - so what?
No tangent and is quite germane to our discussion. It shows where your side has headed in the last decade. And, yes, I will continue to bash the far left for the digression in morality.
You know that isn't what I said.
If you say so.
Obviously, there is a comparison because that is what we're doing, you as well as I. The difference is that you are willing to overlook a career white collar criminal who continues to flout the law being put in one of the most powerful white collar positions in the world where the potential for continuing to crime and the potential for actual harm worldwide to people is enormous while, at the same time, condemning someone who paid for her crime and turned her life around even though the new position has no connection to the long past crime.
The thread is not about Trump and you know that I’m not a fan. I am comparing severity of crimes. You are flirting with the false equivalency fallacy.
My argument clearly stated that she DID murder someone but not that she would murder anyone if elected. You are twisting my argument so yes it is a Strawman.
She not only sought rehab, but successfully completed it.
Good for her. Hopefully she’ll remain sober.
Is the person who orders a murder equally liable as the person who carries it out?
Yes according to the law. Even the one driving the getaway car (if there was one) is equally as guilty.
Lols, the severity of her crime? The crime was murdering someone! The crux of your argument is that she murdered someone!
The crux of my argument IS the severity of her crime BECAUSE she murdered someone.
She has not been rewarded for it. :doh: She was punished for it (unlike the other person who committed crimes). She was elected despite the crime, not because of it while the same cannot necessarily be said of Trump.
She should have served a lot longer than ten years for the taking of a life. The victim and their family are serving life without the possibility of parole.
Upvote 0

Mass celebrated again at ancient St. Maron’s Shrine in Syria after 15-year silence

For the first time in over 15 years, the Maronite Church in Syria celebrated a solemn Mass at the ancient shrine of St. Maron in the village of Brad, northwest of Aleppo.

A pilgrimage to the site, organized by the Maronite Scouts, drew more than 80 participants, young and old, reviving one of the most sacred Christian sites in the region known as the “Dead Cities.”

Father Ghandi Mahanna, who led the liturgy, reminded worshippers that “the true presence of God is found in every human heart,” urging them to live faith through love.

The group also visited the nearby ruins of St. Simeon the Stylite’s Church and the cave chapel once home to the hermit Toufic Ajib, which suffered partial damage during the war.

Continued below.

Pope Leo XIV: Build the Church on the solid foundations of Christ, not on worldly criteria

At the Basilica of St. John Lateran on Sunday, Pope Leo XIV urged Christians to build the Church on “solid foundations” rooted in Christ rather than on “worldly criteria” that demand immediate results and overlook the value of patience and humility.

Celebrating Mass for the solemnity of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica — the cathedral of the bishop of Rome and the oldest church in the city — the pope reflected in his homily on the meaning of this feast and on the Church as a living temple built of “living stones.”

“The millennial history of the Church teaches us that with God’s help, a true community of faith can only be built with humility and patience,” he said. “Such a community is capable of spreading charity, promoting mission, proclaiming, celebrating, and serving the apostolic magisterium of which this temple is the first seat.”

The pope drew on the image of the basilica’s physical foundations to speak about the spiritual foundations of the Church. “If the builders had not dug deep enough to find a solid base on which to construct the rest, the entire building would have collapsed long ago,” he said. “As laborers in the living Church, we too must first dig deep within ourselves and around ourselves before we can build impressive structures. We must remove any unstable material that would prevent us from reaching the solid rock of Christ.”


Continued below.

Are professed Christians that worship our Lord on Sunday instead of Saturday sinning?

Hey there SB! It is about the Book of the Law which circumcision is in not Justifying anyone.
Gal 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

Because we are justified through faith. The Faith that is availed to us through Christ. The faith that Abraham had that established the Law. For God has said,
Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
Gal 2:3 is about circumcision which is part of the book of the law that Moses wrote that was placed besides the ark of the covenant Deut31:24-26. The Jews were requiring new Gentile converts to be circumcised to hear the gospel Gal 2:3 and in order to be saved Acts 15:1. This is what Paul was constantly correcting that they could save themselves apart from Jesus, which we know was never the role of circumcision or any law for that matter.

We are justified through faith agreed. :)

Those with faith do what our Lord and Savior asks. We are saved by grace through faith, our actions shows if our faith is genuine or not, like Abraham 26:5

Like Jesus taught

Luke 6:46But why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say? 47 Whoever comes to Me, and hears My sayings and does them, I will show you whom he is like: 48 He is like a man building a house, who dug deep and laid the foundation on the rock. And when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently against that house, and could not shake it, for it was [j]founded on the rock. 49 But he who heard and did nothing is like a man who built a house on the earth without a foundation, against which the stream beat vehemently; and immediately it [k]fell. And the ruin of that house was great.”
Upvote 0

Democrats shut down government

Most Americans want the ACA subsidies to be extended. Hence, why Democrats are winning in polls across the nation. You can't take people hostage if they're the ones voting for the Democrats to halt the CR.
Upvote 0

B flat B♭

Pleiades is not a single star, but a cluster of stars, so it cannot be correct to say that Pleiades is the only star in the sky which remains stationary.

If you watch the video @36:20 he states it is Polaris that is fixed which is very very very slowly on the move.

Nights when the moon is shining tend to be cooler than when it is obscured by clouds, because those clouds help keep the previous day's warmth in. Somebody with the scientific knowledge may be able to say definitely, but as far as I know, moonlight does not itself cool things down.

In the moon light it is always cooler.

Satellites don't even look like balloons.

No, what is this ? It is a crashed satellite with the Balloon still attached to it.

a satt.JPG


You would never get to magnetic north by sailing south. That's the opposite direction.

No, but why do compasses stop working the closer you get to the true North Pole ?
Upvote 0

What is the meaning of Total Depravity?

f already have, many times.
Prove it. . .assertion without demonstration is without merit.
There's nothing about imputed, at least as in personal righteousness not given; there's just righteousness-and unrighteousness- with concepts such as righteousness reckoned or charged, righteousness given, many made righteous...

To be sure, sin was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not charged against anyone’s account where there is no law. (Ro 4:23). Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who is a pattern of the one to come.
Precisely. . .

The wages of sin is death (Ro 6:23).
Where there is no law, there is no sin (Ro 4:23) and, therefore no curse of death.
There was no law between Adam and Moses, and yet they all died anyway (Ro 5:14).
Of what sin did they die when no sin was charged against them.

Your answer?
(Feel free to exegete Ro 5:12-19 in agreement with the text, context and the rest of the NT).

Biblical answer:
They died of the imputed sin of Adam (Ro 5:17, 18-19), which imputed sin of Adam was the pattern (Ro 5:14) for the imputed righteosness of Christ.

In Ro 5:12-19, Paul is demonstrating the imputed sin of Adam to all mankind, where between Adam and Moses there was no sin because there was no law and no death for its violation, yet they all died anyway. . .because of the imputed sin of Adam (Ro 5:17, 18-19).
For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man,
Death reigned through Adam. . .through the accounting/charging of his sin to all those of Adam (Ro 5:14, 17, 18-19), which was the pattern (Ro 5:14) for the accounting/charging of Christ's righteousness to all those of Christ.
how much more will those who receive God’s abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ! Consequently, just as one trespass resulted in condemnation for all people, so also one righteous act resulted in justification and life for all people. For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous. Rom 5:13-14, 17-19
Same with Phil 3:9, nothing about an imputed righteousness at all:
"...not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ—the righteousness that comes from God on the basis of faith."
The righteousness that comes from God (Ro 1:17, 3:21, 4:5) is through faith in Christ, which righteousness is the imputed righteousness of Christ (Php 3:9), just as righteousness was imputed to Abraham through faith in the promise (Ge 5:5-6, Seed, Jesus Christ, Gal 3:16).
This is all about the gift of righteousness, as we become united with Him:
We are united with God through faith in Christ, wherein the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us (Php 3:9).
just as righteousness was imputed to Abraham through faith in the promise (Ge 15:5-6, Seed, Jesus Christ, Gal 3:16).
Upvote 0

The Ten Commandments are the Covenant, did you know?

The New Covennt is in effect because of Jesus' declaration that it is so (Lk 22:20, 1 Co 11:25).

You nullify the old covenant that the new testament refers to as basis, Jesus has basis for our trust with the prophecies of him being fulfilled. It is not the same without it. There was no argument against the new covenant, why try making an argument?

That is false. The Old Covenant did not bring about the New Covenant. On the contrary, the Old Covenant was a restatement of the curse of Man in the garden of Eden, particularly as applied to the nation Israel.

The Law, which is the Old Covenant, stipulated that Israel could *not* enter into God's presence closely or permanently by all kinds of requirements. A fence separated the people of Israel from priestly activities. Even the priests were separated by the curtain from the Holy of Holies.

The peole were told at Sinai that they could not draw near to God, but could only hear God. Israel was forbidden from even being the People of God unless they engaged in blood sacrifice, the animals standing in for them in their Sin guilt.

So, the Law restated the curse of God's Law, which prevented Israel from approaching God and the Tree of Life. But the New Covenant, by contrast, opens the door to the Tree of Life through the sacrifice of Christ.

Why did the Law look so much like what Jesus did? It was because the Law was a temporary provision so that Israel could remain as the People of God in hope that one day, through Christ, they could finally enter into close to God and in a permanent way. The Law held out this hope, but did not provide this hope--just a temporary state of existence.

But the New Covenant fulfilled all of these shadows in the Law, rendering Israel the People of God. Christ made them the People of God forever, to dwell with Him forever, by becoming the real and final priest, temple, and sacrifice. The old is in a sense built upon the shadows of the old, but the old did *not* provide for the new--quite the contrary!

No, you were false. And I said the new covenant had fulfillment of the shadows in the old covenant in Christ, in which there was the reality. There was much the law could not do that is done in Christ, but this applies to any people responding in faith, which Yahweh provided for to the people of Israel earlier through that system. It was all fulfilled with all that Christ is and was doing. Nothing in the old covenant was lacking such fulfillment. It then had value for there to be the new covenant.
Upvote 0

Am I Weird, Or Is He Weird?

@Isaac the Recluse @mourningdove~ @Michie @Jermayn @comana @RileyG @FireDragon76 @2PhiloVoid

Got more replies than expected. Thank you everyone for reading, and for your input. There's some info left out of the OP because I like to keep posts as short as possible, and because I didn't think it relevant, or because I thought it was too personal.
I apologize for this post being long, which I try to avoid usually, but it seems necessary here.

The man I'm talking about is my priest, and I didn't really know if I should say that. I know most of you don't have priests, some of you have pastors maybe.

He's a very kind and caring man. He knows me well. I've confessed my sins to him. He knows me better than I know him, but I do know that even before becoming a priest he lived a very straight-laced life. Never smoked, never drank, that kind of thing. In 10 years with him as my priest, I've had to confess to him two brief illicit relationships I've had. With women, grown women. There was no adultery involved. I confess every sin of significance. If I ever had that abominable inclination towards children, he would know.

The incident I'm talking about happened at our church's Halloween party. I and some other guys had been there that morning to clean and set up for the party. Another adult at clean up told me he'd be at the party later, and I went to the party to talk to him about some real estate business.

When I first arrived at the party, walking in, the priest waved me over to sit with him. First thing he said after "hello" was "You came to a children's Halloween party?" The human brain works quick, and I said something like "Oh yeah, I love seeing the kids in their costumes." I mean, yeah, I like kids seeing kids in cute costumes on the same level any normal person might like it, so it wasn't a lie. I just thought maybe saying I was there for business might seem un-festive and maybe even crass. This may have been a mistake on my part. I've been to other kids events in the past, like Halloween and Easter egg hunts, but I go to socialize and have fellowship with the adults.

There's one thing I got wrong in the OP. I said I'd never said a word to any of his children, but I had forgotten one single exception with the boy. Many years ago, one Sunday morning during our church service, the priest's son was throwing a loud tantrum in the narthex, screaming and crying. I was in the narthex being an usher. I watched his mom try to calm him, and his mom's mom try, and others try, all in vain. He wouldn't stop, so his mom put him outside on the balcony, where he continued the tantrum.

I had a hunch that I might be able to calm him, and the hunch was actually based on the fact that I'd never spoken to him. I had the idea that he might feel awkward acting out in front of an adult stranger, because the other adults who unsuccessfully tried to calm him were the more gregarious types who I frequently see talking and playing with the kids after church. So when his mom walked back in, I asked her "Do you mind if I go out and speak with him?" She said "please do ", so I went outside and made small talk.* It worked. He calmed down, was happy and smiling, came back inside, and the mom and grandmother were grateful and thanked me.

I should add that that morning, we were having our service at a vacant retail office space. While I was talking to his son, it was right outside the front of the building which is made up of wall to wall, floor to ceiling plate glass windows. I was alone with the kid, but in plain view of about a dozen people, including his mom and grandmother, in the narthex.

I have no idea if the priest's wife ever told him about that, but I wonder if she did, that perhaps he got the wrong idea about me wanting to talk to his son alone outside the wall of clear glass windows?

But I don't really think he thinks I have any perverse "thing" for kids. The thing that insulted me most was when he said "but you can hang around us here", which seems to imply that he thinks that I want to glom onto his family, as if I'm some lonely loser or something. He knows my immediate family is all deceased, but I'm an uncle and a great uncle, and my nephews and nieces and I have always gotten along great our entire lives, and always spend time together throughout the year.

I'm going to talk with him next week. I really do appreciate everyone's input, especially the part about parents wanting to be protective. I never had children, but I have a beautiful doggie that I love, and if anyone ever tried to harm it, it would be better if a millstone were tied around their neck...:)

* This was in January. During the small talk I asked him what he got for Christmas. He said all he got was a tomato. A single tomato. I suspect this isn't the whole truth, but if it is, I'm afraid I'm going to have to have a second talk with my priest and his wife about how Santa Claus is supposed to work. :)
Ohhh I see. Maybe he sees it as more of a pastoral friendship and didn’t want to come off as overly friendly? If I’m making sense? I don’t know.
Upvote 0

Pardoned Jan. 6 defendant who fired gun at the Capitol arrested on kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault charges

Well that proves it. We all know what this means. This means that John Banuelos, 40, who is from Utah but whose sister lives in the Chicago area, was arrested “near 29th Street and Cicero Avenue in Cicero” on Oct. 17, according to the Cook County Sheriff’s Office. A warrant for his arrest was issued in Salt Lake County on Oct. 1 on charges of aggravated kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault, the Cook County Sheriff’s Office said.

Banuelos was previously identified in an NBC News story in February 2022, which revealed him as the man who shot off a weapon at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Online “sedition hunters” correctly identified Banuelos, 40, and gave his name to the FBI in February 2021. Months later, on July 4, 2021, Banuelos stabbed a man — Christopher Thomas Senn — to death in Salt Lake City, but was not charged after claiming self-defense.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

I used the gun example to show it is not defeated if we cannot find the tools. We can still tell what tools like what gun or bullet. Without the gun and bullet.
This is not true, forensics say that a bullet caused the hole because they compare it to holes left by bullets fired from guns vs other holes. If they don't have an example of the technology that caused the hole they wouldn't say that it is caused by ancient technology X1, X2, ... or Xn. Can you give an example from the world of forensics? I've only worked with DNA evidence and then we always compare it with the assumption that the trace is matched by chance alone. So how do you propose that we calculate the likelihood ratio of the "witness marks" are left by the orthodox methods vs any ancient technology?
Upvote 0

The revelation of Jesus Christ

Eternal Son of God

Alpha and Omega

Who is and who was who is to come

The Almighty

The first and the last

The living One

He was dead

And alive forevermore

He has the keys of death

And of Hades

Jesus, the Christ

The God of the seven stars

And seven golden lampstands

Blessed be the Lord

Blessed be the Lord indeed

An EBT Crisis?

Some retailers would like to help, but that's illegal.

(While I understand the fundamental fairness that's the issue here -- this would certainly be one way to get SNAP money to go further, in general. Kinda like having 'reduced lunch' at school.)
It's dusty in here.

Feds told Oregon grocers they couldn’t offer 10% off to SNAP recipients, so they got creative

The McGintys, who own the McMinnville Grocery Outlet, tried to offer a 10% discount to all SNAP recipients whose food-assistance money had been frozen. But when the feds told them no, they came up with a go-around: Extending the offer to all customers.

“Now there’s a catch to it, and I need your help as a community,” Mike McGinty announced in an Oct. 31 video posted to Facebook. “If you do not need a discount, please do not ask for it.”

But if you do, “Take it. Ask for it.”
Upvote 0

God's Divine Protection Of The Church During The Tribulation

Where is the Mark of the Beast then?
The prophecy in Dan 9 and the Olivet Discourse of Jesus were focused upon the time of Jesus' earthly ministry, leading to his being "cut off." Both prophecies spoke of the fall of Jerusalem and the fall of the Temple following Israel's apostasy and rejection of Christ.

The Mark of the Beast was spoken of by John after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD and refers to the prophecy in Dan 7, where the "Little Horn," aka the Antichrist, will reign for 3.5 years, unmolested on earth and raining terror down upon the saints, ie the Church. And so, we are talking about two separate prophecies, one focusing upon Israel and the other focusing upon the entire Church at the end of the age.

I wouldn't claim to know what the Mark of the Beast is. But it's obvious that it is a means by which people can be differentiated between those who reject Christ and those who embrace Christ.

Those who reject Christ at this time will adapt to and embrace a corrupt world system that utterly rejects and persecutes Christianity. We will know those who throw their lot in with the world by their complete acceptance of this soon-to-come world system in all of its corruption.

We are already seeing the apostasy of Christian Civilization. And we are already seeing what that corruption is bringing, and how the world is coming to promote it. So, what the Mark is doesn't concern me, and doesn't seem to be the concern in the Scriptures. Our concern should simply be to follow Christ's word in our hearts and minds, and to do what we're shown to do.
Upvote 0

Even if (more likely "when") Momdani becomes NYC Mayor studies show the richest New Yorkers will stay

Zohran Mamdani rolls out veteran city leaders, Dem heavyweights to lead transition

Mamdani named an initial slate of transition chairs that includes former Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, former First Deputy Mayor Maria Torres-Springer, United Way of New York City CEO Grace Bonilla and former Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services Melanie Hartzog. Elana Leopold, who held several senior roles during the Bill de Blasio administration, is the transition’s executive director.

Even MAGA world finds something to like in Mamdani's administration!

'Thank God the comptroller is Jewish': Trump ally quickly clarifies incendiary statement

“I think a lot of the antagonism against Mamdani is really not about policies or past statements. It's the idea of a scary Muslim person suddenly leading New York City,” said former White House senior advisor Nayyera Haq. “Luckily, I mean, I was on the capitol property at my first job on 9/11. I think in 20 years we've evolved and moved past these scary images of halal meat coming for you.”
..
“He's already said we're not going to invest in any of our funds — thank God the [New York] comptroller who controls the funds is Jewish,” blurted the “Arthur Aidala Power Hour” host, causing confused looks and sidelong stares around the table.

“What does the comptroller being Jewish have to do with it,” asked Haq.
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

If you can make more money living on welfare than you can by working then your employer is screwing you over. Quitting and living on welfare would be the right thing to do if you can't get a better paying job.
Yup. Why do you think so many are against UBI? So people will have to take jobs with poor pay instead of holding out for better pay.
Upvote 0

Rick Warren shares 7 purposes of communion and the Bible's warning

SEOUL, South Korea — Pastor Rick Warren says believers often miss the connection between partaking of the Lord’s Supper and Christ’s commission.

Closing out what he described as a historic global gathering of Christians on the final evening of the World Evangelical Alliance’s General Assembly at SaRang Church, Warren delved into the scriptures to guide churchgoers and delegates in understanding the significance of communion and how it’s linked to God’s assignment for their lives.

“Our communion feeds and fuels our commission. Our worship feeds and empowers our witness,” Warren said, reflecting on the strength and comfort derived from the gathering of Christians in worship and communion before going out individually to the four corners of the world to share the Good News.

“Communion — also called the Lord’s Supper or the Eucharist — is one of the most sacred practices in the Christian faith,” added the world-renowned evangelist and author of The Purpose Driven Life. “It was instituted by Jesus Christ on the night before His crucifixion, when He took bread and wine, gave thanks, and shared them with His disciples, saying, ‘Do this in remembrance of Me’” (Luke 22:19).

Before listing the seven purposes of communion, Warren homed in on a grave warning about participation found in 1 Corinthians 11:27-29, which says:

“So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. For those who eat and drink without discerning the body of Christ eat and drink judgment on themselves.”

Continued below.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,877,896
Messages
65,408,948
Members
276,352
Latest member
Ocean.Child