There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History
- By sjastro
- Physical & Life Sciences
- 1454 Replies
Each individual exhibited a form of creativity but sorry to dash your hopes but creativity is not some ethereal quality which science cannot explain.Maybe this is how the ancients came to understand deeper realities of nature. Their consciousness took them into realms that the material mind through intellect could not.
They became part of the equation in their consiousness which brought that deeper knowledge. THeir consciousness was beyond the restrictions of the material and this gave them the knowledge. As though they could say it came from somewhere I can explain and the knowledge was beyond what they could have come to through empiricle sciences of the physical senses.
It actually makes sense. We see these symbolic symbols like snakes and creatures the ancients say are related to the spirit world. So maybe these are the outward expression of that inner realm of consciousness.
Its just now it will happen less often or will be fobbed off as imagination. The more the material worldview thinking took over it blocked out this channel of knowledge. It was rationalised away as unreal because it was not objective or fitted a material paradigm.
You may be on to something here.
But what is the cirect test to confirm this. What tests will tell Einstein that this is an objective fact that he can show others. What if its the experience of music. What test will show that experience.
Yes like Edison says that the idea for his inventions came to him from what seemed nowhere. Like the universe just gifted him the knowledge. There was no explanation for why and it certainly was not a rational step by step process he could lay out as a fact.
Are you seriously trying to explain subjective experience as a objective fact that we can see and measure in the world independent of the subject.
Thats only supporting the idea that consciousness can give deeper knowledge that the material science methods cannot give us. Thus supporting the claim that the ancients being more conscious of nature and reality became more knowledgable.
They were able to tap into this non material aspect of consciousness and gain deeper knowledge. So image an almost uninhibited connection to this realm that seems to bring knowledge out of nowhere.
Einstein's brain was removed under the flimsy excuse it was part of the autopsy procedure of the hospital but turned into a full blown scientific investigation of how his brain varied from a typical brain, particularly Einstein's superior visual spatial reasoning which defined his creativity.
| Brain Feature | Typical Human Brain | Einstein’s Brain | Possible Cognitive Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inferior Parietal Lobule (IPL) | Normal size and folding; separated by a typical Sylvian fissure. | Unusually large, highly folded, Sylvian fissure partly absent, giving more cortical area. | Enhanced visual–spatial reasoning, mathematical intuition, and ability to mentally manipulate physical systems. |
| Parietal–Frontal Integration | Standard boundaries and separation between frontal and parietal regions. | More integrated parietal and frontal regions observed in images. | Improved ability to combine abstract ideas, form mental models, and think conceptually. |
| Glial-to-Neuron Ratio (especially in Area 39) | Average glial density; typical metabolic support. | Higher glial density in some regions responsible for complex thought. | Enhanced neural support for sustained reasoning, possibly enabling long periods of intense thought. |
| Corpus Callosum Thickness | Typical thickness and fiber density. | Thicker in several regions, especially mid-body and isthmus. | Better communication between hemispheres → integrative, cross-domain thinking. |
| Overall Cortical Complexity | Typical gyrification patterns. | More complex folding in certain cognitive areas, especially parietal regions. | Increased surface area for specialized processing → potentially greater cognitive capacity in specific domains. |
| Frontal Lobes (DLPFC areas) | Typical prefrontal organization. | Some evidence of unusually connected frontal-parietal networks. | Improved working memory, planning, and conceptual synthesis. |
| Language Areas (Broca/Wernicke) | Typical development. | No major anomalies observed. | Consistent with Einstein's own statements that he “thought in images, not words”—creativity rooted in visual reasoning rather than linguistic processing. |
| Overall Brain Size | ~1,350 g average adult male. | ~1,230 g (slightly smaller than average). | Shows that size is not related to intelligence; efficiency and structure matter more. |
I want you to tell me the outcome of the ancient Egyptians transcendental ideas or experiences which according to you is manifested in the use of superior technology so where is it? I could just as easily state it is in the existing tools as confirmed by the archaeological evidence.You just told us.
Lets throw a spanner into the works on the subject of Methological Naturalism which you mistakenly refer to as material science.
The Kahun Medical papyrus from the Middle Kingdom shows the Egyptians had developed a pregnancy test where women would urinate on barley and emmer-wheat seeds over several days. If the seeds sprouted indicated the women where pregnant.
Modern scientific studies indicate the test is up to 80% accurate and caused by increased levels of estrogen in the urine of pregnant women.
This is an example of the science of cause and effect, the ancient Egyptians only had the experience of observation which is the effect, they were not aware of Methological Naturalism and attributed the cause to magic.
It highlights the fact the role of the supernatural in science is useless particularly when it is not falsifiable.
Upvote
0