Latest activity

Bob Crowley · 2025-12-11T18:15:59-0600

Years ago they used to recommend using a torniquet, but that restricted blood flow to the limb below the binding.

This sometimes led to other medical problems, so they devised the pressure bandage idea.

On a morbid note, the former OIC of our local ambulance station said the most emotional fatality for him was due to a snake bite when he was stationed in Townsville years ago.

A young girl had been playing in the backyard (on a swing maybe) when she jumped off and landed on a Taipan which was hidden in long grass.

It struck her on the chest about five times. She died in minutes.

On a happier note, I heard a Baptist pastor say that when he was a young chap following his father in long grass on their farm he suddenly found he just could not take another step. He said it was like being held in a giant hand - he just couldn't move, no matter what he did.

His father came back to see why he was just standing there in mid-stride. As he did so he saw a death adder in the exact spot where his son would have taken his next step.

They're the fastest striking snake in the world.

Obviously God had plans for the son to become a pastor, and protected him. As the pastor said he literally couldn't move.

Why God protected him, and not the young girl was God's choice.

bbbbbbb · 2025-12-11T18:15:49-0600

Bro.T said:
So if you say that you know God, but you don’t keep his commandments, lets see what the Lord had specially written for you. It says in (1John 2:3-4) (v.3) And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. (v.4) he that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. Then the book says in Revelation 21: 8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

These are hard words coming from the word of God, I would take heed and start keeping these Commandments. But of course it's your choice.

Well, I guess that leaves Rahab out.

bbbbbbb · 2025-12-11T18:15:09-0600

SabbathBlessings said:
Those who abide in Him and He in them. John15:4-10 1 John2:3-6

Sadly many people believe the devil has more power to keep us in sin than Jesus does to save us from our sins Mat1:21, I happen to believe we can overcome through our love of Jesus John14:15-18 Rev14:12 , the book of Revelations repeats this over and over again before His revelation, He has a people who overcomes. I think the bigger issue, is most people like their sins more than their love for Jesus to seek His help in forsaking their sins. Mat 4:17 John3:19-21 Pro28:13 1 John5:14

Thanks! I am abiding in Him thanks to His grace and mercy alone and none of my own merit or works.

walter45 · 2025-12-11T18:14:01-0600

1. Do we let the words in the scriptures speak for themselves?
2. Or do we explain in so many words that scriptures mean something else?

Ephesians 2:8-9, Titus 2:11
Hebrews 5:9
Mark 13:13
John 3:5
John 3:16
Matthew 28:20 and 1 John 2:3-6
2 Thessalonians 1:8

Which scriptures are true? Shouldn't we consider all these scriptures to be true, or does one scripture cancel out the other scripture?

What if we used all these scriptures in our understanding?

Once Jesus was made perfect he became the source of Eternal Salvation for all who obey him, and it is by God's grace, his undeserved kindness that we are saved, we should endure to the end, we should get baptized, we should believe in Jesus and observe all his commands, those who do not know God and Obey the good news of our Lord Jesus will be punished.

BPPLEE · 2025-12-11T18:12:21-0600

FreeinChrist said:
Sad to see folks repeat lies.

Per AI (Google)

No, the claim that U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar married her brother is a persistent conspiracy theory that has been widely debunked by multiple fact-checkers and investigations. There is no credible evidence to support it.
The allegation first appeared in 2016 on an anonymous internet forum and was later amplified by conservative blogs and political commentators, including President Donald Trump.
Here is a summary of the facts:

Denials Omar has consistently called the rumors "absolutely false and ridiculous".

Investigations Reputable news organizations like the Star Tribune and non-partisan fact-checkers such as PolitiFact and Snopes have investigated the claims and found them to be unfounded.

Documentation Records from Omar's family's 1995 entry into the United States list her as the youngest of seven children, and the name of the man she supposedly married (Ahmed Nur Said Elmi) does not appear in those documents as a sibling.

FactCheck.org has catagorized the story as untrue.

So please stop with the misinformation.

Thete is a recent article in The Daily Mail regarding this but that's about the equivalent of The National Enquirer

fhansen · 2025-12-11T18:10:20-0600

Dikaioumenoi said:
You still have yet to address my refutation of this position. Who does the "him" refer to in the clause, "and I will raise him up on the last day"? There's no disputing that it refers to those who actually come to Jesus. But who comes to Jesus? Grammatically, what is John saying here?

οὐδεὶς δύναται ἐλθεῖν πρός με ἐὰν μὴ ὁ πατὴρ ὁ πέμψας με ἑλκύσῃ αὐτόν, κἀγὼ ἀναστήσω αὐτὸν ἐν τῇ ἐσχάτῃ ἡμέρᾳ

"No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up on the last day."

The αὐτόν who is raised on the last day is the same αὐτόν who is drawn. Grammatically, the pronoun in ἀναστήσω αὐτόν must refer back to the nearest suitable antecedent, which is the οὐδεὶς δύναται… ἐὰν μὴ ὁ πατὴρ ἑλκύσῃ αὐτόν clause. In other words, the "him" who is raised is the "him" who is drawn. The text itself makes no grammatical space for subdividing the referent into two groups -- those enabled to come, versus those who actually do.

Your reading requires precisely that distinction -- that some of the "him" drawn are not the "him" raised. But the syntax does not supply a second referent for αὐτόν to latch onto. You must therefore import an unspoken category. In other words, you're making an interpretive move that presupposes the very point you want to prove. Meanwhile, the surrounding context (vv. 37, 39, 65) consistently grounds coming in sovereign initiative, which strongly argues against any basis for that presupposition.

Again, consider the contrapositive.

Let p = "one can come to me"
Let q = "the Father draws him"
Let r = "I will raise him up"

The verse, as stated, reads: "not p if not q, and r," which, stated formally in symbolic logic, is (-q --> -p) ^ r

The contrapositive of this is (p --> q) ^ r, which reads:

"If one can come to me, then the Father has drawn him, and I will raise him up."

Who does Christ promise to raise? The one drawn. Who is the one drawn? The one enabled to come.

"If Sam is able to come to me, then the Father has drawn Sam, and I will raise Sam up."

This is a promise of final salvation based on the Father's sovereign act in drawing/enabling individuals. The natural implication of this is that this act of enablement leads effectually to coming to Christ. It is a transformation of the heart. This comports with John 6:37: "All that the Father gives me will come to me."

You're trying to get way to much distance out of a single verse which was only meant to serve as a concise summary of the Way, of how one is saved. Salvation is directly related to one's nearness to God-coming to and being united with Him-that's why Jesus came, to reconcile and restore broken relationship between man and God.

Sam was enabled to come. Sam came. God will raise him up. Nothing conflicts there with the fact that Sam must remain in Him, Sam must persevere, Sam must overcome sin, Sam must make effort to be holy-or else Sam won't be one of those who are raised simply because he once responded and came. And that's all consistent with Scripture, early church teachings, and the ECFs.

probinson · 2025-12-11T18:09:58-0600

Dan Perez · 2025-12-11T18:03:21-0600

d taylor said:
-

Romans 10:9 is not even a salvation verse

Ans SORRY you can not believe , BUT

# 1 FOR. // GAR is a CONJUNCATION

# 2 WITH THE HEART /// KARDIA. is. I the DATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 3. MAN BELIEVES. ///. in. the PRESENT TENSE in. the PASSIVE VOICE means CHRIST is working. on all unbelievers

in. the INDICATIVE MOOD , means you better believe IT

# 4 UNTO /// is a PREPOSTION

# 5 RIGHEOUSNESS. /// DIKAIOSYNE. is in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINFULAR

# 6 AND ///. DE is a CONJUNCATION

# 7 WITH THE MOUTH /// STOMA in the DATIVE CASE , in the SINGULAR in. the NEUTER , meaning MALE or FEMALE

# 8 CONFESSION. IS MADE ///. HOMOLOGEO. in vv. the PRESENT TENSE , meaning IN. THE NOW , in the INDICATIVE MOOD

meaning you better believe IT !!

# 9 UNTO /// EIS is a PREPOSITION

# 10 SALVATION ///. SOTEHA. in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR.

THE BEST TO YOU !!

dan p

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T18:01:01-0600

Bro.T said:
It’s starts off with repentance, that’s one of the first thing Jesus says when he got started in his ministry, Jesus says in Luke 5:32 I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. Stop sinning is the first forms of repentance, that's a lot work on it's on. Learning how to get self out the way. Now, Grace is nothing more than a free gift. And that free gift is our access back to the tree of life (Jesus) which Adam caused us to lose by disobeying God. Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (Romans 5: 12) But to maintain your grace you must keep the law. (1John 3:4) Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Now we have just read the biblical definition of sin, the transgression (breaking) of the law (commandments.) It doesn’t matter what you or I think sin is, it’s what God says sin is that counts.

And per your belief and admission those that don’t keep the sabbath are sinners and if they don’t repent will go to hell. So much for salvation by the free grace of God through faith in the Son. You are a legalist and promote a works salvation.

FreeinChrist · 2025-12-11T17:55:36-0600

I have a friend whose mother was exposed to measles in the first trimester and it was before measles vaccines were around. My friend was born deaf which was a not uncommon occurrence in those situations.
Measles also causes blindness and other genetic issues.

FreeinChrist · 2025-12-11T17:51:17-0600

Always in His Presence said:
Be careful - there are a number of poster who take great exception to the use of AI - Just wanted to let you know.

I'm not one.

This had been added to the Rules (the part in red)

Copyright Legalities, Spamming and Advertising, Signatures, Videos

Use of or posting from content originating at Our Daily Bread Ministries is forbidden at the request of Our Daily Bread Ministries.
Quoted portions of any work should not exceed 20% of the total work. Materials owned by the Associated Press must be quoted using only one sentence. All quoted copyrighted material must be linked to the web page from which it was taken. Do not violate the copyrights of others or promote another work as your own.
Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources.
Repetitive posting of similar or identical posts or threads is not allowed. Do not advertise commercial products or services. This prohibition includes begging or soliciting donations or financial support (charitable or otherwise) anywhere on the site. Do not advertise or promote other sites in your signature or your custom username title.
Signatures may have tickers and CF internal links, but not other external links. If desired, place these other links on your profile page.
Videos posted in the Opening Post (OP) need to contain a summary of the video, including what it is about and a few key points. An exception can be made for music videos.
Youtube videos, blogs, and offsite materials written by members may be posted to further conversation and provide relevant topics. There are however some restrictions. You may not participate in Christian Forums primarily to drive traffic to your videos, blogs, or articles. Staff will use their own discretion as a team in deciding if your participation here is being used for this purpose and it may result in staff action.

We probably need an announcement about it. It is allowed, but AI needs to be given credit.
But I understand some do not like AI, and so I try to use it just to support a view. In the one above, it does reference FactCheck.org and Politifact.

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T17:50:05-0600

SabbathBlessings said:
That's what's faith is about, obeying God,

No. Faith is belief in the Lord and who He is. Here is the definition pistis which if faith in Greek and the definition used for the purposes of scripture.

Strong’s Definitions
πίστις pístis, pis'-tis; from G3982; persuasion, i.e. credence; moral conviction (of religious truth, or the truthfulness of God or a religious teacher), especially reliance upon Christ for salvation; abstractly, constancy in such profession; by extension, the system of religious (Gospel) truth itself:—assurance, belief, believe, faith, fidelity.

KJV Translation Count — Total: 244x
The KJV translates Strong's G4102 in the following manner: faith (239x), assurance (1x), believe (with G1537) (1x), belief (1x), them that believe (1x), fidelity (1x).
Outline of Biblical Usage

conviction of the truth of anything, belief; in the NT of a conviction or belief respecting man's relationship to God and divine things, generally with the included idea of trust and holy fervour born of faith and joined with it
1. relating to God
  1. the conviction that God exists and is the creator and ruler of all things, the provider and bestower of eternal salvation through Christ
2. relating to Christ
  1. a strong and welcome conviction or belief that Jesus is the Messiah, through whom we obtain eternal salvation in the kingdom of God
3. the religious beliefs of Christians
4. belief with the predominate idea of trust (or confidence) whether in God or in Christ, springing from faith in the same
fidelity, faithfulness
1. the character of one who can be relied on

SabbathBlessings said:
disobedience to God and His commandments is rebellion, sin unbelief and disobedience Heb3:7-19.

No. You are again reading your pet doctrines into scriptures. Heb. 3 speaks about the disobedience and disbelieve of Israel which caused them the “rest” of entering into the promise land.

SabbathBlessings said:
I already posted the words of Jesus, if one won't believe His plain teachings, nothing I can say is gonna make a difference.

No. You posted your interpretation of the words of Jesus. Big difference. You still believe that salvation is by faith plus works of the law.

I know your church follows the dietary laws. Is it a sin not to follow the dietary laws?

Factotum · 2025-12-11T17:43:15-0600

durangodawood said:
I think you mean incompetence drives the bus. (Because, generally, competence has a lot to lose signing on to this corrupt clown show.)

This was all strategic by the Trump DOJ, in order to beat the statute of limitations deadline on charging Comey. Kalligan beat it by 36 hours I heard.
Now that Kalligan is disqualified, the Court gives them several weeks to replace her and reinstate the charges.

It was very clever, by Bondi.

Always in His Presence · 2025-12-11T17:38:52-0600

FreeinChrist said:
Sad to see folks repeat lies.

Per AI (Google)

No, the claim that U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar married her brother is a persistent conspiracy theory that has been widely debunked by multiple fact-checkers and investigations. There is no credible evidence to support it.
The allegation first appeared in 2016 on an anonymous internet forum and was later amplified by conservative blogs and political commentators, including President Donald Trump.
Here is a summary of the facts:

Denials Omar has consistently called the rumors "absolutely false and ridiculous".

Investigations Reputable news organizations like the Star Tribune and non-partisan fact-checkers such as PolitiFact and Snopes have investigated the claims and found them to be unfounded.

Documentation Records from Omar's family's 1995 entry into the United States list her as the youngest of seven children, and the name of the man she supposedly married (Ahmed Nur Said Elmi) does not appear in those documents as a sibling.

FactCheck.org has catagorized the story as untrue.

So please stop with the misinformation.

Be careful - there are a number of poster who take great exception to the use of AI - Just wanted to let you know.

I'm not one.

d taylor · 2025-12-11T17:36:35-0600

-

Larry Bird

Factotum · 2025-12-11T17:26:00-0600

I definitely agree that Jordan is THEE ABSOLUTE WORST in history, when it comes to drama... here's my choice, for his worst drama moment:
Login to view embedded media

...and when it comes to TEAM sports, I stand with Magic Johnson re: the NBA ...when he said it is illogical to use the amount of titles won, to determine the GOAT player in a team sport. Because winning titles = there are just 'too many moving parts' that are impossible to give proper credit to.

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T17:22:45-0600

SabbathBlessings said:
We are saved by grace through faith. Some how the devil has deceived so many that faith means being disobedient to God and what He asks (His commandments)

You don’t really believe that we are saved by grace through faith because you and your church also believed that keeping the sabbath is necessary for salvation. So you and your church believe in salvation by faith plus works.

Akita Suggagaki · 2025-12-11T17:20:06-0600

Dale said:
Where did Jesus ever say that Genesis is a literal historical accvount? I don't see where He ever said this.

We often refer to fictional characters as if they were literal historical. Someone out if context could think we mean them that way.

rockytopva · 2025-12-11T17:19:17-0600

What about Democratic run cities? What about the killing of Killing of Iryna Zarutska? The Democrats just let her bleed to death! None of those Democrats on the train offered to help the poor lady! Just sat there on their cell phones and let her bleed to death! The Democratic judges had released the killer countless times on cashless bail, the Democratic mayor said his mental state needed to be taken in consideration. What about the mental condition of the Democrats who just sat there and watched the lady bleed to death? No offers of help! No Democrat came to her protection! On the video you can see the killer with blood dripping down his hands saying, "I got that white woman! I got that white woman!" And nobody rebuked him for it!

To all non-Americans... Stay away from Democratically run cities! They are all savages like the world has never seen! The latest tourist figures in regards to travel to America already hit rockbottom last summer. Who can blame them? Who would want to invite anyone here?

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T17:15:47-0600

SabbathBlessings said:
No according to Jesus. If you love me KEEP My commandments John14:15 For this IS the Love of God that we KEEP His commandments 1John5:3 Those who say they know Me and do not KEEP My commandments is a liar and has no truth in them. The only one who wants us not to keep His commandments and stay in our sins is the other spirit 1John3:8

What is required for salvation?

FreeinChrist · 2025-12-11T17:14:41-0600

Always in His Presence said:
Glad she was able to marry her brother to make it happen

Sad to see folks repeat lies.

Per AI (Google)

No, the claim that U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar married her brother is a persistent conspiracy theory that has been widely debunked by multiple fact-checkers and investigations. There is no credible evidence to support it.

The allegation first appeared in 2016 on an anonymous internet forum and was later amplified by conservative blogs and political commentators, including President Donald Trump.

Here is a summary of the facts:

Denials Omar has consistently called the rumors "absolutely false and ridiculous".
Investigations Reputable news organizations like the Star Tribune and non-partisan fact-checkers such as PolitiFact and Snopes have investigated the claims and found them to be unfounded.
Documentation Records from Omar's family's 1995 entry into the United States list her as the youngest of seven children, and the name of the man she supposedly married (Ahmed Nur Said Elmi) does not appear in those documents as a sibling.

FactCheck.org has catagorized the story as untrue.

So please stop with the misinformation.

Hentenza · 2025-12-11T17:14:00-0600

CLEEB said:
Law keeping, Sabbath keepers or legalism is a very powerful deception. I was caught up in this myself for ten years. I know that they will go to extremes to defend themselves by bending and twisting scripture until it breaks. Unless GOD opens their eyes they will remain in ignorance. You and i are wasting our time with them. They will only aggravate the daylights out of you. Stop casting pearls. Let the blind lead the blind to their predetermined destination.

My decision to engage the legalists is for the benefit of the Christians that only read our website. If we disengage then the only side they will read will be the side of the legalists. The discussions balances the views and exposes the perils of legalism.

I praise the Lord for getting you out of the clutches of legalism. Bless you.

Christsfreeservant · 2025-12-11T17:13:34-0600

The Church isn’t (to be)

• A building built by humans with or without a steeple on top

• A place you go to once or twice a week and then you leave

• A business of human origin being marketed to the world

• Incorporated under (joined, included, united with) the state

• Merged, combined, partnered with the world and the ungodly

[Matthew 21:12-13; John 2:13-17; Acts 5:27-32; 1 Corinthians 1:10-13; 1 Corinthians 3:1-9; 2 Corinthians 6:14-18; Philippians 3:18-19; Revelation 2:1-29; Revelation 3:1-22; Revelation 13:5-8; Revelation 18:1-5]

The Church is (to be)

• The universal body of believers in Jesus Christ, by faith in Christ

• A gathering of people of like faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord

• For the purpose of mutual participation and encouragement

• For mutual edification, exhortation, and sharing of Spiritual gifts

• For the spiritual upbuilding of the body of Christ to spiritual maturity

[Acts 2:14-18,42-47; Romans 12:1-8; 1 Corinthians 12:1-31; 1 Corinthians 14:1-5; Galatians 6:1; Ephesians 2:8-10; Ephesians 4:1-16; Ephesians 5:15-21; Ephesians 6:10-20; Philippians 2:1-8; Colossians 3:12-16; Titus 2:11-14; Hebrews 3:13; Hebrews 10:23-25; James 5:19-20]

Therefore, when we gather together as the church, the body of believers in Jesus Christ, by God-gifted and God-persuaded faith in our Lord, it is for the purpose of our mutual encouragement and edification where each part is able to do its work, as we have been gifted by the Holy Spirit in spiritual gifts, and as we have been given our assignments by God as to our specific body parts (roles, ministries) within the body of believers in Jesus Christ.

So, this is not a “one man show,” where one man does all the preaching, and leads every gathering, and whose sermons are never tested to see if they are of God or not… And where the “pastor” is treated more like a CEO of a corporation, or more like a cult leader who is surrounded by a faithful few who are protecting him and his position, regardless of whether he is right or wrong, or if he is living the Christian life, or not, which is all about running a business. And it is not about a show, period, where a few gifted and talented people (in speaking and in music) put on a stage production intended to draw in large crowds of people from the world into their gatherings.

Yes, the early church had overseers, but they were overseers of the entire church (the body of believers in Christ) within a particular city, so they were not the singular pastors of all these gatherings, which usually met in people’s homes, which is where the people were able to share their gifts and mutual encouragements. And since the body of Christ was to meet daily, and to encourage one another daily, and they met in people’s homes, it may be that there wasn’t always an overseer at every one of their gatherings.

Now, the body of Christ cannot function as the biblical body of Christ in large gatherings where a few people put on the show while the rest of the people largely sit in pews or chairs as spectators, and then they go home and live their normal lives until the next week. The Bible, in fact, teaches that we are to be speaking the truth of God’s word to one another in love, and we are to be speaking to one another in spiritual songs, and we are to be admonishing and teaching one another, and exhorting one another EVERY DAY.

Do we need overseers? Yes! But the shepherds of the people are not to be the only ones doing the talking and the preaching and sharing of gifts. But they are to be those who are leading the sheep in how they are to live and operate together as the body of Christ, who are training and equipping the saints of God in the work of the ministry. For all of us are to be ministers, not just one person. And those who are overseers need to meet the spiritual qualifications of an overseer, and they need to be accountable to the church.

“Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love” (Ephesians 4:15-16). “But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose. If all were a single member, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts, yet one body” (1 Corinthians 12:18-20).

No Less

An Original Work / March 19, 2012
Christ’s Free Servant, Sue J Love

I can do no less than praise You,
Lord, for all You’ve done for me.
You died for my sins to save me,
So I would be set free.
I adore You! Lord, I praise You!
Jesus, Savior, King of kings!
You provided my redemption.
Your grace has pardoned me.

I can do no less than serve You.
Lord, Your witness I would be,
Telling others of Your love,
And why You died on that tree.
Tell of how You gave of Your life,
So from sin we’d be set free,
So we could worship You forever,
And live eternally.

I can do no less than love You,
Lord, for You have first loved me.
You gave of Your life so willing,
Because You cared for me.
Turn from my sin! Obey freely!
Live for You each passing day.
Read Your word, and follow Your lead,
Lord, as I humbly pray.

Login to view embedded media
Church is, Church isn’t
An Original Work / December 11, 2025
Christ’s Free Servant, Sue J Love

probinson · 2025-12-11T17:06:43-0600

BasedLutheran said:
Oops. The only ones politicizing it were the leftists.

Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots

Denial only serves the aims of anti-vaxxers.

www.theatlantic.com

I saw this story yesterday at The Atlantic. The headline is clearly meant to be attention-grabbing. But WOW, what an admission! If you had suggested that a child could have died from the COVID vaccine just a few years ago, you would have been accused of spreading misinformation and censored. That the mainstream media now readily admits that children died from the COVID vaccine is honesty quite astounding. If COVID taught us anything, it's that the only thing that separates conspiracy and "misinformation" from truth is often just time.

But the blasé way that the article approaches this very serious issue is kind of like (my paraphrase)...

Well of course some children died. Them's the breaks. You win some, you lose some. Ah well. Hoory for mRNA!

Absent from that article is any mea culpa or retrospection that, hmm, maybe mandating vaccines for children to attend school was ill-advised, given that children were at an infinitesimal risk from COVID. It's almost like we just have to accept that mandating interventions absent evidence means that, yeah, sure, we're going to lose a child here and there. But SCIENCE!

It would be laughable if it weren't so sad. But the thing that concerns me the most is the lack of concern and the blind trust that so many people still have in the industry and those funded by them. They still truly believe that this is about public health. They can easily spot when Joe Schmo is grifting and making a buck or two on false claims from vaccines, but they are completely, utterly, and I believe in many cases willfully blind to the IMMENSE financial incentives driving our public health "recommendations".

d taylor · 2025-12-11T17:05:54-0600

Dan Perez said:
# 1 THAT //. HOTI. is a CONJUNCATION

# 2 IF. // EAN. is a CONDISITIONAL. PARTICLE

# 3 THOU SHALL CONFESS //. HOMOLOGEP. in v the AORIST TENSE in. the ACTIVE VOICE SUBJUNCTIVE in. the SINGULAR

# 4 WITH. ///. is a PREPOSITION

# 5 THY. /// SOU. is a PERSONAL POSSESSIVE PRONOUN. in. the GENITE CASE in the SINGULAR

# 6. MOUTH /// STOMA. in. the DATIVE CASE in the SINGULAR in. the NEUTER.

# 7. THE LORD ///. KYNOS. in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 8 JESUS ///. in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 9 AND. /// is a CONJUNCATION

# 10. SHALL BELIEVE. /// PISTEUO. in. the AORIST TENSE in. the ACTIVE VOICE is a SUBJUNCTIVE in. the SINGULAR

# 11. IN ///. iOS a PREPOSITION

# 12. THINE /// SOU is a PERSONAL POSSESSIVE PRONOUN in. the in. the GENITIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 13 HEART /// KARDIA. in. the DATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 14 THAT ///. HOTI is a CONJUNCATION

# 15 GOD /// THEOS in. the NOMINATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 16 HATH. RAISED. ///. EGEIRO. in. the AORIST TENSE in. the ACTIVE VOICE in. the INDICATIVE MOOD in. the SINGULAR

# 17 HIM /// is a PERSONAL POSSESSETIVE PRONOUN in. the ACCUSATIVE TENSE in. the SINGULAR

# 18 FROM //. EK. is a PREPOSTION

# 19. THE DEAD /// NEKROS. in. the GENITIVE CASE in. the PLURAL

# 20 THOU SHALL BE SAVED //. SOZO. in. the FUTURE TENSE. in. the PASSIVE VOICE in. the INDICATIVE MOOD

and. that mood means you. BETTER BELIEVE IT. in. the SINGULAR

And all these tenses can. be GOOGLED

AND YOUR LAST. REPLY. is good and I BELIEVE it BUT. all the BIBLE is FOR all. but nor ALL TOO US

And ONLY Paul says HOW all can show how to be saved Eph. 2 : 8 and 9 as we ARE NOT UNDER THE LAW

BUT UNDER GRACE and what I wrote is UNDENYABLE. and Paul only wrote 14 espistles. AND did not write

the ESPISTLE of JOHN

dan p

-

Romans 10:9 is not even a salvation verse

Latest activity

Latest activity

Copyright Legalities, Spamming and Advertising, Signatures, Videos​

Filter

Forum statistics

Share this page

Copyright Legalities, Spamming and Advertising, Signatures, Videos