the myth of flat earth debunked again
- Non-Mainstream and Controversial Science
- 1212 Replies
For boasting
Which feels... not great for a Christian forum.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
For boasting
But your 'circles' supports the killing of babies in the womb - embraces homosexuality and other perversions including promoting pedophilia as a lifestyle choice and normalizing gender dysphoria. Where is any of that in the fruits of the spirit?Excusing and voting for an accused pedophile and rapist.
That's pretty sad. AT least in my circles.
Amen to that. . .I qualify free will as a will free from sin. I learned that from the Holy Spirit of Truth and I gave scripture supporting it. The philosophical free will of secular humanism that disregards God as the power that causes people to act responsibly in love of one another, doesn't even exist in reality. I therefore preach the Gospel where mankind cannot save himself with belief in the false free will that is in reality the fallen carnal will.
For boastingLike the idea of 'counting threads'. Just... what's the point?
Like the idea of 'counting threads'. Just... what's the point?
I’m not going to say that a person who gets an abortion is not a Christian.Of course Christians can make mistakes.
But do they learn from those mistakes or repeat them in either act or support.
Can a Christian who made one mistake, do it again and would that be ok or just considered a mistake?
That's what the Bible says.How do you know, were you there ?

I've told you, several times, that God caused there to be 24 hours of daylight. God stepped in and, momentarily, altered the laws of nature.
Another thing about these cameras is that if you’re doing what you’re supposed to be doing, as a driver you can actually use that camera footage to prove it. They can come in very handy for dispelling false accusations, especially when there’s an accident and someone is lying about what actually took place.Yes, I understand that, but the thing is, laws can be passed that prevent eavesdropping in the workplace, or even in the public if standards can be agreed upon and put into place.
Wouldn't you prefer to be free from that? And if so, why wouldn't we want to stop it? What's the downside?
You are confused. Pragmatics is about context and implicature of words.Yes, the topic is free will.
And using free will to go against God's command ("pragmatics" not-with-standing) violates one's own conscience, no matter what it involves.
The "pragmatics" of man does not override God's commands nor one's conscience.
Yeah I’ve never like the whole scoring idea in CF.
Would you know it, if it was?
As much as I hate the inconvenience, I wouldn’t push against it because I don’t see it as a bad thing. I understand that the purpose of the camera is to promote safety and productivity which as a Christian I have no problem with. As long as I do my job in a safe and productive manner as I should, then I have no reason to be worried about what the camera is recording.Yes, I understand that, but the thing is, laws can be passed that prevent eavesdropping in the workplace, or even in the public if standards can be agreed upon and put into place.
Wouldn't you prefer to be free from that? And if so, why wouldn't we want to stop it? What's the downside?
Yes, because we need our jobs to feed our families. But that doesn't make the practice 'right'.I’m sitting in a commercial vehicle with one of those right now as I do everyday by my own choice. I don’t like it, I’d like to be free to take a drink from my coffee cup while I’m driving, but by agreeing to take the job knowing the expectations of the company I chose to comply with those expectations. Nobody controlled me in my decision.
Excusing and voting for an accused pedophile and rapist.A sitting member of Congress gives her personal phone number out to a convicted child predator and receives text messages from that predator during a hearing.
If that is not sad - I don't know what is.
I qualify free will as a will free from sin. I learned that from the Holy Spirit of Truth and I gave scripture supporting it. The philosophical free will of secular humanism that disregards God as the power that causes people to act responsibly in love of one another, doesn't even exist in reality. I therefore preach the Gospel where mankind cannot save himself, particularly while believing in the fallen carnal will as a free will.Yes, the topic is free will.
And using free will to go against God's command violates one's own conscience, no matter what it involves.
They’re a long way from having AI controlled robots out on the streets. AI requires hundreds of thousands of GPUs which won’t fit into an human sized robot, and at present we don’t have a wireless signal that can carry the vast amount of data fast enough for them to be controlled remotely. Personally I’m hoping that there’s a technological ceiling that prevents this from ever being a possibility. But bigger robots like the ED 209 from Robocop might be capable of containing enough GPU s at some point.Nope, not those specific type.
When I saw the topic title, I immediately thought about giving some A.I. robots some cannons, swords, and machine guns. That’s just a great idea.(sarcasm intended) Or make some suicide bomber bots to take out my enemies muhaha.
Never mind the hacker-bots, sex-bots, and drug mule hauling bots of the future. How about an abortion robot A.I.? That sounds like about the worst use case possible.
Tunneling bot for prison escapes, remote A.I. helicopter for the same…there’s a lot of criminal potential for A.I. that hasn’t been explored yet, mostly because we don’t have gun-carrying humanoids yet. Once we do, the sky is the limit.
Yes, I understand that, but the thing is, laws can be passed that prevent eavesdropping in the workplace, or even in the public if standards can be agreed upon and put into place.Employers do this all the time. They often use cameras to monitor employee productivity. As employees if we don’t like it we’re certainly free to seek employment somewhere else. So I wouldn’t consider that being controlled, I would say that it’s more like consensual observation.
Sorry - reality bites hard sometimesIt compounds the sadness that you think that.
yeah - - - it does.And that is NOT a condemnation of the political parties.
I'm not.Why are you ?
The Supreme Court just ruled today that the President can use the Alien enemies act to deport illegals. He also has the authority to use the military to do so.There is not a comparison between a civil war and today. You guys seem to try to equate belligerents fighting a civil war and illegal immigrants. Expediting deportations still has to be done within the framework of the constitution not outside of it. Expediting deportations does not justify stoping people without probable cause to just check their “papers”.
My Eufy cameras in my house use AI to detect humans rather than just motion which is pretty helpful in protecting my family while we’re at sleep at night.I would be interested in how acceptable it would be if AI were to target pre-crime like the humans did in Minority report. i am not saying we would convict on that, but they could be detained for a brief time to prevent crime. if AI was right just 90% of the time, would it be worth it?
It compounds the sadness that you think that.I agree - it is one of the saddest statements on the condition of politics today. no one on the Left, nor the Right is offering anything better than our current President.