Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Most of us would of preferred single payer which would of reduced the cost, but it was not tenable to Republicans.Right because its so expensive.
On to Raleigh
With a history of losing money.How many business do you own? He has definitely owned more than the majority of people in congress and most of the former presidents.
I have no problem with the concept. Of course you are correct. I was just having a little trouble with the sentence structure. It is not your fault. I should have read it a couple more times.You do understand that you can’t take a flat object and make it into a sphere without distorting it right? You have to stretch, bend, fold, or cut a flat object in order to make it into a sphere. So that would mean that if the earth is in fact flat, it would be 100% absolutely impossible to make a spherical map of it that is actually accurate to scale. It can’t be done if the earth is actually flat. The only way that a globe can be accurately scaled to where you can measure between any two points on it and accurately calculate the actual distance is if the earth is actually a sphere. If the earth was flat then the distances between points on a globe would be severely distorted. That’s why flat earthers can’t produce a flat map of the earth that is actually to scale where you can measure between any two points and accurately calculate the actual distance between those two places that’s why their maps either drastically distort continent sizes to where the southern continents like Australia and South America are 4 times larger than Asia or North America or they dramatically distort the size of the oceans to where you’d be flying 20,000+ miles between Perth and Madagascar if you actually flew traveling straight west according to a flat earth map. If you actually take the shortest route on a flat earth map you’d be flying over Indonesia, India, the Middle East, and East Africa to get there but those flights are directly over the ocean the whole time, not over land. And in reality Madagascar is pretty much straight west of Perth. So if the earth is in fact flat, a globe should be dramatically distorted, but it’s not, it’s actually very precise unlike the flat earth map.
A civil offense, not criminal.So your argument is that looks should not cause one to be arrested. The converse is also true, looks should not exempt one from arrest.
Fact is people are breaking the law. The argument that they were not committing a crime at the time of arrest is spurious. Their mere presence in the country without permission is a crime in itself.
What do "people that are breaking the law" look like?If I look like people that are breaking the law,
No it's not.I would be expecting to be detained and questioned. But for the fact that illegal immigration is a rampant problem in this country,
How did they get over Trump's wall?due to previous lax enforcement,
Being Latino is not cause for suspicion, unless you're racist.Latinos would not be subject to questioning.
Civil rights encourages crime?Crying citizenship and rights violations does not make crime go away. It condones and encourages it.
I'm sure some of your best friends are Mexican!I live in San Antonio, TX. It is the most Latino city in the USA and we voted for Donald Trump because we are sick and tired of citizenship becoming a joke and illegals held up as martyrs
We love Mexican culture in Texas
Illegal immigration is right wing propaganda.Come to San Antonio and see how many Mexican Americans are crying about ICE. We are not. It’s all left wing propaganda. Citizenship is a privilege.
If you actually take the shortest route on a flat earth map you’d be flying over Indonesia, India, the Middle East, and East Africa to get there but those flights are directly over the ocean the whole time, not over land. And in reality Madagascar is pretty much straight west of Perth. So if the earth is in fact flat, a globe should be dramatically distorted, but it’s not, it’s actually very precise unlike the flat earth map.
Just taking one example from your list. There are over 300 Target stores in CA, more than 30 of them around LA alone. By contrast, that’s more than double the number of Targets in your entire state of Oklahoma.It has been happening for years:
As Walmart shuts down four stores in crime-ridden Dem-led Chicago, DailyMail.com lists all the big box shops - from Macy's to Target - which have closed due to millions in losses from rampant theft
Major retailers in the US have been forced to shut down stores due to millions of dollars in losses as rampant theft plagues big box stores across the country.This week, Walmart announced it will shut down four of its stores in Chicago just weeks after America's biggest employer shuttered its only stores in Portland.It comes as shoplifting reaches alarming levels and other large retailers, including Target, Macy's and Best Buy, are now making good on threats to shutter outlets if petty crime was not lowered.Grok does a great job
City Stores Affected Year Details San Francisco, CA Whole Foods (Haight-Ashbury), Target (multiple Bay Area), Nordstrom, Walgreens (multiple) 2023–2025 Whole Foods closed in 2023 due to rampant theft and an overdose death in the store; Target shuttered four locations in 2023 amid organized crime and violence; Nordstrom and Walgreens cited burglaries and safety risks, with 12 Walgreens closures by 2024. Portland, OR Target (three stores), Walmart 2023 Target closed three stores in 2023, blaming theft and violence that threatened staff safety; Walmart reduced operations due to spiraling crime, including murders at all-time highs in 2022. Seattle, WA Target (two stores), Nordstrom 2023–2024 Target closed two stores in 2023 over organized retail crime; Nordstrom shuttered its flagship in 2024 citing theft and aggression, following 2020 looting damage. New York, NY Target (East Harlem), Macy's 2023 Target closed its Harlem store in 2023 due to theft and violence; Macy's faced $10,000+ loots in 2022–2023, contributing to urban pullbacks amid rising shoplifting complaints. Chicago, IL Walmart (four stores), Target, Whole Foods (Englewood) 2023 Walmart closed four stores in 2023 after tens of millions in theft losses; Whole Foods shut in 2023 due to lack of demand tied to crime; Target and others cited 25% theft rise. Philadelphia, PA Target, Macy's, Wawa 2022–2023 Multiple lootings in 2022–2023, including Macy's security guard stabbing; Target closed stores in 2023 amid waves of smash-and-grabs; Wawa looted repeatedly. Los Angeles, CA Target, Walmart, Nordstrom 2023–2025 Target and Walmart closed amid 2023 theft surges; Nordstrom cited crime in 2024; 2025 protests escalated to looting, accelerating exits in high-crime areas. Oakland, CA Target, REI 2023 Target closed in 2023 after 76% burglary rise; REI shuttered due to theft and violence; nearby stores saw 440+ incidents despite closures. Baltimore, MD Target 2023 Closed in 2023 after 10 years, citing theft in poverty-stricken areas; part of broader urban exodus. Atlanta, GA Walmart, Target 2023 Walmart closed a store in 2023 due to theft; Target followed suit amid organized crime.
These closures impacted urban "food deserts," exacerbating access issues, with over 150 Target stores affected nationwide by crime in 2023 alone. Retailers like Walmart warned of further shutdowns if prosecution remains lenient. By 2025, trends continued with Walgreens planning 500 closures, though not all tied directly to violence. No widespread new looting events were reported in late 2025, but organized theft persists.
It takes some work to seek out both sides from reasonably reliable sources. Often both sides agree on “what happened “ but have vastly different interpretations or spins. But sometimes even the “what happened” is not agreed upon. Then we need to listen to more sources and decide for ourselves.Hi everyone,
I recently had a disagreement with someone who only watches CNN and MSNBC (Channels that seem to be biased against Trump). Throughout the conversation, they repeatedly insisted that Trump is a “bad person.” As we talked, it became clear that their view was largely shaped by the news sources they rely on—sources that often present only one side of the story. Interviews and coverage usually feature voices that already oppose Trump, and little effort is made to offer a fair or balanced view. This kind of repeated, one-sided storytelling can deeply influence how we think about someone.
As Christians, I believe we need to be very careful here. Scripture warns us not to bear false witness (Exodus 20:16), to avoid gossip and slander (Proverbs 10:18, James 4:11), and to speak truthfully. If there’s no real, clear evidence that a leader is doing wrong, I think we should either remain silent or even offer our support, because to speak against someone based on filtered or biased impressions could cause us to unintentionally spread slander.
That said, we also need to be careful on the other side. It's easy to say that if media builds up a leader, at least it's not gossip. And that’s true—praise isn't slander. But even then, we can't leave our discernment at the door. Just because a leader is being praised by the media station that we prefer doesn't mean they're righteous. History reminds us of this painfully.
The German people, for example, were also swept up by positive portrayals of Hitler. They listened to state-controlled media that praised him as a national saviour. Many supported him enthusiastically without asking deeper questions. Over time, that blind endorsement helped enable one of the greatest evils in history. So we need to recognise that the danger cuts both ways—biased negativity can lead to slander, and biased praise can lead to complicity.
So here’s the heart of the matter for me:
1. When does it become our responsibility to discern truth for ourselves and stop blindly trusting what we’re told,- whether that message is for or against a leader?
2. And if the media we're listening to is constantly negative about a leader, at what point do we become responsible for spreading lies, slander or gossip?
We live in a world full of information and opinions. As followers of Christ, we are called to seek truth, walk in humility, and avoid careless speech. That includes what we say about political leaders. I'd love to hear your thoughts on where this responsibility begins and how we can guard our hearts and words in this area.
Grace and peace,
Nathan
The rock is a rock.
How many business do you own? He has definitely owned more than the majority of people in congress and most of the former presidents.Do you have any idea how many times Donald Trump and used and abused the bankruptcy laws by using corporate bankruptcy to avoid paying contractors? And also stockholders? Abusing the bankruptcy laws is not business success.
Before Regan.When were fiscal conservatives fiscal conservatives?
Oh, that's rich. . .No, we get too technical translating these words at times,
When were fiscal conservatives miscall conservarives?When were fiscal conservatives fiscal conservatives?
We would then finally have some oversight over their finances. How much do they pay their officers? How much do they take in? How much do they spend on charitable programs? Just as we have Charity Navigator to help rate charities to avoid giving away to scams, we could have Church Navigator, to assess whether church donations were being spent wisely.So what is supposed to be accomplished with the form?
The opposite of my former parish which embraces WOKE ideology andI find that surprising. Our parish is mostly GOP
You do understand that you can’t take a flat object and make it into a sphere without distorting it right? You have to stretch, bend, fold, or cut a flat object in order to make it into a sphere. So that would mean that if the earth is in fact flat, it would be 100% absolutely impossible to make a spherical map of it that is actually accurate to scale. It can’t be done if the earth is actually flat. The only way that a globe can be accurately scaled to where you can measure between any two points on it and accurately calculate the actual distance is if the earth is actually a sphere. If the earth was flat then the distances between points on a globe would be severely distorted. That’s why flat earthers can’t produce a flat map of the earth that is actually to scale where you can measure between any two points and accurately calculate the actual distance between those two places that’s why their maps either drastically distort continent sizes to where the southern continents like Australia and South America are 4 times larger than Asia or North America or they dramatically distort the size of the oceans to where you’d be flying 20,000+ miles between Perth and Madagascar if you actually flew traveling straight west according to a flat earth map. If you actually take the shortest route on a flat earth map you’d be flying over Indonesia, India, the Middle East, and East Africa to get there but those flights are directly over the ocean the whole time, not over land. And in reality Madagascar is pretty much straight west of Perth. So if the earth is in fact flat, a globe should be dramatically distorted, but it’s not, it’s actually very precise unlike the flat earth map.I don't understand this sentence.