He’s a citizen with a Real ID. ICE detained him anyway. Twice.
- By Hentenza
- News & Current Events (Articles Required)
- 142 Replies
Actually it is. The operative word here is “unreasonable”. There are emergency situations where the safety of the public is at immediate danger were LE can stop people that they deem suspicious. There is nothing immediately dangerous to the public about stopping a truck with a ladder on top unless the ladder is the weapon lol.The constitution protects from unreasonable searches and seizures. It is not a blanket protection from law enforcement
Yes the raids are unreasonable. ICE still needs to not trample the constitution in their haste to keep up with the quota.With over 20,000,000 illegal aliens in the US, now down to probably 18,000,000, the ICE raids are not unreasonable
Strawman. Never argued that.It is your opinion that illegal immigration is not a problem, but our president disagrees.
Again, it all has to be done within the framework of the constitution. These people are not enemy combatants. Look get rid of the criminals by using proper investigation techniques to identify the criminals. Regular police do this all the time.Article II and current statutes give him the sole discretion to determine what constitutes an invasion, what is a problem and where law enforcement needs to be directed
Great but they should not have to be subjected to an illegal search without probable cause. Again, what does an illegal Mexican look like?Latinos can protect themselves by knowing their rights and having proper encounters with law enforcement. If they are citizens, they will enjoy the freedoms that accompany citizenship
Not whining at all but it seems like you are because I’m challenging your boy. Article II is subject to the rest of the constitution not in spite of the rest of the constitution.Your whining about the 4th amendment does not override article II or article I which gave the president statutory authority. Don’t like him? Vote him out
Like the Russians used to do? Papers please comrade?In the current declaration, it is not unreasonable to question anyone’s immigration status.
No problem. I have always supported law enforcement .Citizens need to be prepared to defend their freedom by supporting law enforcement not fighting them.
You are Catholic. Maybe you should listen to your pope.Illegal aliens should live in fear, they are here illegally. Self deport of face law enforcement. They have a choice.
“Pope Leo has come out in support of a rare special message released by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in recent days that lamented a "climate of fear and anxiety around questions of profiling and immigration enforcement."
"I think we have to look for ways of treating people humanely, treating people with the dignity that they have," he said. "If people are in the United States illegally, there are ways to treat that. There are courts, there's a system of justice."
So you consider places like Alligator Alcatraz to not be like a concentration camp? You really need to wake up from that dream.I could see if we were rounding up Latinos and herding them into concentration camps or ghettos, but that it not the case. They are being deported according to the civil penalty that follows their act if they are here illegally.
That is a biblical concept that relates to casting out demons. Are you equating illegal aliens to casting out demons?It is written that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Like who? Are you just venting cause I have no clue how this relates to our conversation.Too long we have been subject to agitators who wish to use the constitution against their own country.
You are joking right? Have you read it?The fourteenth amendment does not confer birthright citizenship ,
They have to be reasonable and stopping someone that is walking down the street or driving a truck with construction tools in it is NOT reasonable.and the fourth amendment does not protect against reasonable searches and seizures,
Why would most people even have to get to this point? I’ve lived in the states for over 60 years and never even faced an opportunity to use it.the fifth amendment is only applicable if citizens know how to properly invoke it. If they waive their rights knowingly or unknowingly, they are not protected by the fifth amendment.
Like you? Cause if course your opinion would be absolutely right and everyone else would be wrong. I bet you are the best driver out there too.It is only an opinion that people have about the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment that causes our current problem ,
Completely irrelevant to our present situation. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus to suppress dissent and maintain public safety during the Civil War by allowing the arrest and detention of suspected traitors and saboteurs without formal charges. This is hardly what is happening now.and we had plenty of subversives that wish to use article III against their own country.
Same thing happened to President Lincoln, and he invoked the insurrection act.
I hope so.The Supreme Court will hopefully clarify things soon.
Is my opinion subversive?That is constitutional, subversive opinion is not
Upvote
0