University of Minnesota on Whiteness Pandemic
- By rambot
- American Politics
- 60 Replies
Please point out where I've done that.Of course, you're defending something you haven't read, so what does that say?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Please point out where I've done that.Of course, you're defending something you haven't read, so what does that say?
Are there any investigators left (or their supervisors) who would take such an action?As I said, the Pentagon itself should have both feet on the "double tap" accusation because that would be a clear-cut violation of the Law of Armed Conflict at the basic troop level. The Congress should not be involved at the level of figuring out who pulled the trigger...their involvement would come from how the Pentagon resolves that violation of the LOAC (presuming it actually happened). We don't need Congress investigating a problem the Pentagon is already charged by law to investigate.
But to the extent it keeps Congress from discussing the extent of the resolutions they've passed, it delays the resolution of the problem only they can resolve.
You don't need to know anything about Star Wars. There are plenty of "Easter eggs" for fans, but people who don't know won't miss it. The creator, Tony Gilroy, wasn't even a particular fan of Star Wars himself. Star Wars merely provided him with a setting for a story he had always wanted to tell. I think he intended to tell a "Doctor Zhivago" depth of story for the 21st century.I have seen you mention Andor a couple of times and I am thinking of checking it out but I don't know much about the chronology of Star Wars. How much of a Star Wars expert do you have to be to keep up with events on the show?
The definition of an apostle is rooted in the Greek concept of an authoritative emissary or delegate, meaning the individual is specially commissioned and sent on a particular mission. The title is reserved for a representative who is empowered to act and speak on behalf of the sender, carrying their official authority and mandate. Therefore, to be considered an apostle requires a direct, official appointment, not merely a desire to carry a message.A little Biblical history and perspective first.
First and foremost is Jesus Christ -
Heb 3:1Therefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our confession, Christ Jesus,
There is the Original 12:
Judas was replaced by Matthias - After Judas Iscariot's death, Matthias was chosen by lot to replace him and is explicitly numbered "with the eleven apostles" (Acts 1:26). He is therefore referred to as an apostle. They held a unique position (role) in the Gospels -
- Simon (Peter)
- Andrew (his brother)
- James (son of Zebedee)
- John (his brother)
- Philip
- Bartholomew (Nathanael)
- Thomas (Didymus)
- Matthew (the tax collector/Levi)
- James (son of Alphaeus)
- Thaddaeus (Judas son of James, also called Jude or Lebbaeus)
- Simon (the Zealot/Cananite)
- Judas Iscariot (the betrayer, later replaced)
Rev 21:14 Now the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
The Reader will notice that the writers of their Gospels - Luke and Mark were not part of the 12. - yet many refer to them as Apostles
Luke 9:1 Then He called His twelve disciples together and gave them power and authority over all demons, and to cure diseases. 2 He sent them to preach the kingdom of God and to heal the sick. 3 And He said to them, “Take nothing for the journey, neither staffs nor bag nor bread nor money; and do not have two tunics apiece. 4 “Whatever house you enter, stay there, and from there depart. 5 And whoever will not receive you, when you go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet as a testimony against them.”The reader will note that the 12 were called disciples when they were with Christ and Apostles when they were sent out -
Keep reading:
Luke 9:10 And the apostles, when they had returned, told Him all that they had done.Same 12 people - their titles changed from disciple to apostle because they were sent out on a specific journey.
Luke 10:10 After these things the Lord appointed seventy others also, and sent them two by two before His face into every city and place where He Himself was about to go. 2 Then He said to them, “The harvest truly is great, but the laborers are few; therefore pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest. 3 Go your way; behold, I send you out as lambs among wolves. 4 Carry neither money bag, knapsack, nor sandals; and greet no one along the road. 5 But whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace to this house.’ 6 And if a son of peace is there, your peace will rest on it; if not, it will return to you. 7 And remain in the same house, eating and drinking such things as they give, for the laborer is worthy of his wages. Do not go from house to house. 8 Whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you. 9 And heal the sick there, and say to them, ‘The kingdom of God has come near to you.’ Luke 10:17 Then the seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name.”EXACTLY the same direction from the Lord - EXACTLY the same authority and results.
Apostle - transliterated - apostolos - a delegate; specially, an ambassador of the Gospel; officially a commissioner of Christ ("apostle") (with miraculous powers):—apostle, messenger, he that is sent.
Then there is Paul - an Apostle to the Gentiles
Barnabus - Acts 14:4 But when the apostles Barnabas and Paul heard this, they tore their clothes and ran in among the multitude, crying out
James - Gal 1:19 19 But I saw none of the other apostles except James, the Lord’s brother.
None will ever be to the level of the 12 -
But there are numbers called by God and sent who bear the Title Apostle who preached the Gospel, cast out demons and healed the sick.
When I think of modern times, I think of Dr. Billy Graham, who preached the Gospel to over 1 billion people - ministered to Kings and President, who's ministry saw tens of millions come to Christ for Salvation.
Anything to back that up?From what I gather, just three days before the incident, there was a flurry of Google searches on Rahmanullah Lakanwal.
The suspicion is that some entity was checking to make sure all tracks were covered.
idk… I can think of some family members who’d warrant a thumbs up…
You have turned this thread into one involving credibility issues to compensate for your inability to comprehend anything even remotely technical from both your so called experts and the comments here from various posters.Your probably a bit like me and getting sick of the whole thing now. Its become a thread on credibility and once it gets to that point we may as well forget the whole thing.
Abraham was marred to his half sister. Genesis 12:5 According to the law Deuteronomy 27:5 & 22 Leviticus 18:9 Leviticus 20:17 Ezekiel 22:11
Abraham also committed adultery with Sarahs handmade to give birth to Ishmael.
There were no law of Noah, it’s not in the scriptures. This fellow who says there is has dreamt them up in his own carnal mind.
The Ten Commandments and law of Moses were completely unknown to everyone before Moses just as Moses said,
but this fellow has like the vast majority does, make things up the defy scripture.
"I am hereby cancelling all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden, because the people who operated the Autopen did so illegally."
![]()
BREAKING: Trump Declares Any Document Signed by Biden with Autopen is Terminated | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
President Trump on Friday declared any document signed by Joe Biden with an autopen is “hereby terminated and of no further force or effect.” “Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby terminated, and of no further force or effect.www.thegatewaypundit.com
We can't have a country where unknown people issue presidential orders.

The logical problem with Jesus only dying for the elect is you need to know you are of the elect before you can trust in Christ. IOW if you don't know Jesus died for you, how can you then trust in him? But Calvinism solves this illogically, saying if you do trust in Christ, he died for you, but that is no solution to the problem. It all seems theologically upside down.For all those Christ died His death exclusively for them acquired:
Deliverance from the wrath to come 1 Thess 1:10
10 And to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come.
For He was raised for our Justification Rom 4:25
25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.
So again, those for whom offences He was delivered for, they the same consequently were delivered from the wrath to come!
I think it depends what the issue is. I assume you are talking about social and ethical issues mostly. Though just about everything can have a social and moral component.
I think the first thing is to recognise the overall culture in which this is happening. It is a different world to the one 50 or 75 years ago. Overall we are a postmodern society. That means the fundemental belief is all things are relative or at least there is an increased inclination to question everything. Oppose stuff for the sake of doing so because its what we do.
So already its a mindfield of decades of post Enlightened rationalisations and people are very good at posing alternatives and articulating arguements. Rightly so as within some contextes they are sound and rational and needed.
Taking this into consideration the first thing to note is that playing the same game by the same rules is not going to work. You more or less become another voice in a pot of voices all proclaiming a subjective truth. So you have to know when its a subjective matter or a factual matter or a bit of both and when to adapt or cease to engage.
I think apologetics is important. But basically I think its a spiritual battle. Most will not even believe such a thing so you cannot get into a rational debate. But we can say that what is being objected to or claimed within the social and moral or political realm is subjective. It is a belief no different to religious belief.
I mean for Christians there are certain core truths and we should be united in mind and spirit. So no need to arguements or decending into politics. Otherwise its not good fruit. Some arguements on the bible are not worth it if they cause division. Just leave it that people believe different and let God show the way.
But in the end all you can do is profess your belief, give testimony of the gospel and leave it at that. People underestimate testimony and we don't have to apologise for it. We use testimonial experience all the time and people believe people.
In saying that I think its by living the gospel or the teachings that will show others that this is not just about words or rationalisations. But a experiential belief that becomes reality. It has a real effect and presense in the world. Thats the evidence and its tangible in that sense. No one can argue about someone who is living the words without fault.
Often it is not what someone said but how they said it or what they actually did that later won the person over. We know that despite all the apologetics that it may be something completely unrelated that caused a person to hear Gods voice.
You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. But you can show them the life giving water and leave it up to God.
That’s “moot” you’re looking for. Just beginning the hilarity in this post"Your question is mute
Not in any rational way, anyhow.I can't comment on your wild theory
Because you have to read it through the impenetrable fog of your hand wrought doctrine.because it makes no sense.
Because you a, shall we say “unique” understanding of what you believe the Bible “really means”, which often has little or nothing to do with what it actually says.It's not a valid question, there's not a single shred of Biblical evidence to support your silly nonsense".
I don’t think anyone will have any luck finding that one.I'm not waiting for you to find the words "antihalation"
That’s generally referred to as “death” by native English speakers.and or "cessation of existence",
I’m not sure we’ve seen enough evidence to convict you of that charge.I know the bible
Given that nobody talks that way that isn’t really a surprise, is it?and I guarantee they are not there
Is that a class on various heterodox/heretical pseudo Christian sects?so back to class you go.
Well, he's not just murdering them. He's also trying to provoke Venezuela into giving him a casus belli.If Trump pardons Juan Orlando Hernandez. That means, that he doesn't care about drug smuggling. Tha means Trump isn't killing the people on those boats over drugs. So Trump is just murdering those people on the boats.