• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Morality without Absolute Morality

Pardon for thinking you actually understood a simple word. I shall not make that mistake again.
The issue isn't understanding, it's your twisting my response into something that it wasn't. Perhaps you don't understand my criticism?
I wasn't speaking of faith, but an insufficient text. If you don't derive your position on the "ultimate" source from the text, from whence it comes?
A person.
What belief? That I can't see the beginning because it is blocked observational. That one? I'd call it supported by evidence. There are some that like to play around with notions of imagining past those limits, but I am not interested is speculative cosmology. Too unfirm and lacking foundation from my taste.
The belief that there is no "ultimate", that it is turtles all the way down.
Upvote 0

Trump live updates: President expands ‘narco’ boat strikes to Pacific Ocean as 8th boat is struck

The point that Trump ain't the first POTUS to use the military to fight against the narco cartels.
Other presidents used the military to train non Americans and supplied them with equipment and info (see quote in post above). That's not what you said, is it...
Upvote 0

UK University Slaps Violence Warning on Bible, Citing the Crucifixion and Cain and Abel

I don’t see the Bible as simply stories in a book like any other book. Again, nothing in Scripture indicates those incidents with Lot and his daughters was okay.
you still don't get it. its ok.
Upvote 0

Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’

A White House official previously said that signing the petition would be seen as a “very hostile act to the administration.”

The administration? Or just one member of it?
Not just one member...
Trump and administration officials reached out to Boebert and Mace in the hours ahead of Grijalva signing the petition Wednesday, as either one of them removing their names would have prevented the effort from succeeding. CNN reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel planned to meet with Boebert on Wednesday.
Those would be a few more members of the administration actively engaged in the cover-up
Upvote 0

He’s a citizen with a Real ID. ICE detained him anyway. Twice.

What's silly about it?, it's a real world example of a federal agency that acts in a way that would be "4th amendment questionable" if done by regular executive branch LEOs

Dow Chemical actually tried to sue the EPA when the EPA was using aerial surveillance equipment to get eyes on their plants that were suspected to be "playing loose and fast with the rules" in order to gather info to use against them back in the 80', protesting it on 4th amendment grounds, and the courts ultimately ended up siding with the EPA.

The IRS example is valid as well. If the IRS goes to my bank tomorrow and demands all of the last year's transactions, not based on having any evidence or probably cause, but because they merely want to look for something to use against someone. (IE: Fishing Expedition), that's a 4th amendment violation as well by the standards people are setting in this thread.
What is silly about it? ICE doesn't regulate anything. That's one thing. A thing you have been told about by several posters in several posts. Here's another: The courts aren't exactly "pro 4th amendment rights" even when regular cops (and not regulatory enforcers) are violating it.
I'll just cut to the chase here...the reason why progressives care about the ICE actions, but not about the actions of the EPA or the IRS is for superficial political reasons.

"Evil greedy capitalist corporations that pollute to keep profits high are bad"
"Rich people who find ways to exploit tax loopholes are bad"
-- so 4th amendment be damned in those cases where executive agencies act with impunity to bust them.

But, "enforcing immigration laws is racist, ", therefore, anything the agency in charge of that facet of the law does "needs to be held to the strictest interpretation of constitutional standards on searches and private property rights".


That is the long sort of it... so all anyone has to do is publicly proclaim (no takebacks, and it has to be honest and not hedged with some goading disclaimer to try to make me reply to it)

"EPA and IRS tactics are just as sketchy and overreaching as ICE tactics, but they don't bother me as much because they bust the people I don't like, the reason I oppose ICE is because I feel like they're on the same side as my political opponents",

and I'll gladly exit this thread and not make another single post in this topic lol.
Don't try to tell my why I care. Your assumptions are poor and irrelevant to the actions of ICE. (Plus I stop reading when you tell me why I am taking the position I am taking.)
Upvote 0

what is Calvinism answer to how God works?

what concerns me, if Calvinism is saying that some will become believers but then fall away because they were never going to be elect, it's like giving pretending to give someone an amazing gift only to take it away like some kind of joke.

I don't know if that is what Calvinism is teaching, but if it is then how would a Calvinist be sure of their eternal destiny if they have no idea if they were elect?
Same thing with Jehovah's Witnesses and their 2 class system. The people who think they are apart of the 144,000 just think they are. And it seems the Calvinist is the same for whatever reasons they have, it comes down to belief that they just think they are. The entire idea that God chooses who is saved and who isn't and there is nothing anyone can do about it, has a lot of issues due to Gods nature. I don't think for a second that Calvinists are correct in this idea.
Upvote 0

Young earth vs Old earth?

I thought they might help. I was wrong.
Each verse I gave you starts by saying it's now going to give the history. Followed by the history.
  • Genesis 2:4 - The history of the heavens and the earth when they were created.
  • Genesis 5:1 - This is the historical record of Adam's generations.
  • Genesis 6:9 - This is the history of the generations of Noah.
  • Genesis 10:1 - Now this is the history of the generations of the sons of Noah and of Shem, Ham, and Japheth
  • Genesis 11:10 - This is the history of the generations of Shem.
No need to overthinking things, J.
Yea sure.

So my thought was, Genesis 1 tells this aspect of history. And then chapter 2 continues that history. As opposed to retelling it. I'll go back and reread your post to see if I'm missing anything.

I agree that the YEC view of trees growing fast and the events of chapter 2 happening in a single day don't make any sense though.
Upvote 0

Testing AI in Reading & Comprehension

No, that would be one of mine - can you guess why? I’ve mentioned it in a few posts; its something of the signature breakthrough of my project.
I've got you beat. I was born when the highest technology machine in a house was the television, with no remote control. You had to walk across the room to change the channel. :)
Upvote 0

Intercessory Prayer

CHALLENGE
“Unanswered prayer disproves Christ’s teaching on prayer. Jesus said, ‘If you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, “Move from here to there,” and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you’ (Matt. 17:20b). But experience shows that we can’t do such things by prayer.”

DEFENSE
Jesus’ teaching is more complex than this challenge suggests. It doesn’t involve a promise that we’ll always get what we ask.
First, Jesus makes the statement when the disciples have just failed to exorcise a demon. When they ask why they were unable to drive it out, he says, “Because of your little faith” (Matt. 17:20a). If the apostles, who were accustomed to working miracles, including driving out demons (Matt. 10:1, 5–8), could have inadequate faith, then we may, too. (Also, in this instance the disciples were trying to cast out a particularly powerful type of demon; Mark 9:29).

Continued below.



Login to view embedded media
9:38
OFF TOPIC, but Fr. Mike is really handsome.
Upvote 0

The Thing Most Sabbath Keepers Do not Talk About.

There are 2 spirits in this world God placed us in, according as it is written in the Holy Scriptures. 1 Spirit, is the Holy Spirit of God that God gives to them that obey Him according to Scriptures. The "other spirit", is the spirit of this world that worketh in the Children of Disobedience. The Holy Spirit promotes the Righteousness, definition of Holy and Just and Clean that comes from God the Father and shown to men though His Holy Scriptures that Paul said were Trustworthy, "for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works, whose Words Jesus said to Live By. The other spirit promotes the religious judgments, traditions and seductive philosophies of man, in many cases, as Jesus teaches, from men who call Him Lord, Lord, or that "Come in His Name, Teaching that HE is the Christ. Paul warns of this as well, concerning men who "Transform themselves" into Apostles of Christ.

Neither spirit is silent and guides those who choose to listen to them.



The "Faithful", that Paul prays for would be "them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality". Those who "yielded themselves" to God and their bodies "as instruments of righteousness unto God", "that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance." Those who "put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And became renewed in the spirit of your mind; And put on the new man, which after God (not the religious traditions, judgments and philosophies of man) is created "in righteousness" and true holiness. (As defined by God, not religious men of this world)

Those who turned away from the spirit of this world, "Wherein in time past they walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

As it is written, "Be Holy for I am Holy". You would do well to look up where God made this declaration so as to better understand what His Definition of "Holy" is. As opposed to adopting the definitions promoted by this world's religious system.



And yet you promote the popular teaching of this world that Paul as a Pharisee, was zealous to walk in the commandments of God, not the commandments, traditions and judgments of man as Jesus taught. The Rich man also said he abided by all the commandments of God since his youth even after the Prophets told him, " If they sin against thee, (for there is no man that sinneth not,) and thou be angry with them, and deliver them to the enemy, so that they carry them away captives unto the land of the enemy, far or near;".

So clearly there is the influence of a spirit here, but not according to the knowledge of the truth, as defined by the Holy Scriptures.

This is why, in my understanding, that even though Zacharias, Simeon and Anna, (Luke 1&2) read the exact same Scriptures as the Pharisees and Scribes, they were given by God the Holy Spirit of Truth, while the Pharisees and scribes who read the exact same Scriptures, "were not thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,"

As a result Zacharias and Simeon and Anna knew and believed in the Prophesied Messiah before He was even born, while the promoters of the mainstream religions of the world at that time, didn't know Jesus when HE was right in front of them.

When the influence of the spirit of this world would induced Zacharias to ponder, "Does it really matter if a man obeys God's Commandments or not"? Zacharias, like Abel, ruled over this spirit, and "Yielded Himself" a servant to obey God, as Paul teaches. While the mainstream preachers of that time, like Cain, protected and preserved the spirit, and it reigned in his mortal body.

If you believe this understanding doesn't align with Scriptures, please make the case.




I am instructed by the Holy Scriptures to discern this world's religious philosophies, and "test the spirit" that is behind them, whether they are wrought in God or not. It is not about you Carl or me. We have all been deceived, which is defined, in my understanding, as believing something about God that is not true, according to the Scriptures. Rather, it's about the religious doctrines, traditions and philosophies that are promoted by the "Many" who come in Christ's Name, that the Jesus "of the Bible" told me to "Take Heed" of.

The mainstream preachers of Jesus time, the Pharisees, were also offended when the Scriptures exposed a doctrine or tradition they promoted, that was wrought in man, and not in God. Many, as Jesus teaches, "hide from the Light" so as to preserve their traditions and philosophies. But the Faithful "SEEK the LIGHT" for the very purpose of exposing the wickedness they know dwells within them. You can read this for yourself in John 3: 19-21. But unless a man "believes" enough to become a "Doer" of the Christ's Sayings, and not a hearer only, this man's house will not stand in the storms of this life. And when this man stands before the Christ face to face in the judgment, he will see what is coming and will plead his case, "But Jesus, don't you know who we are? Why we built massive religious businesses and invested in the healthcare industry, all in your Name. We cast out demons, and got folks off drugs and a life of crime, all in your name? We created our own high days, judgments and preached to the people of this world, "all in your Name". But What is it that the Christ expects from those who Call Him Lord, Lord?

Duet. 10:12 And now, Israel, what doth the LORD thy God require of thee, but to fear the LORD thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the LORD thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul, 13 To keep the commandments of the LORD, and his statutes, which I command thee this day for thy good?

So even though these men believed they were "serving the Lord", Jesus points out that they were not, but it was too late for them. I believe hE gave these warning because it isn't too late for us.

I welcome the discussion about what is written in Scriptures and discerning popular doctrines. I can't help that you might be offended by what the Scriptures actually say, but I understand because I too was offended when I first studied for myself, what is actually written.

The Jesus "of the Bible" says that all who fall on Him will be broken. That isn't a very good marketing strategy for this world's religious system to persuade folks to join and support their religions. But as Paul said, what he lost, her counted as dung.

I hope you might consider that there are 2 spirits, and choose to walk in the Spirit of God, not the spirit of this world.

So to 'call a spade a spade' you are saying I am inspired by Satan.

I am not at all surprised.

Have a great day.
Upvote 0

Do you keep the Sabbath? (poll)

1. 1 Cor 7:19 'What matters is KEEPING the COMMANDMENTS of God"
Yep. Encapsulated in Jesus two love commandments except for the 4th commandment whivh Jesus fulfilled on Himself and became the Lord of the sabbath.
2. Eph 6:1-2 "the first commandment with a promise is -- Honor your father and mother"
Yep. Encapsulated in Jesus two love commandments.
3. Rev 14:12 "the saints KEEP the Commandments of God and their faith in Jesus"
Yep. Encapsulated in Jesus two love commandments.
4. Rom 3:31 "what then? Do we make void the Commandments of God by our faith? On the CONTRARY! We establish the Law"
Think about this one for a bit. First, the word commandment does not appear in the verse.

“Where then is boasting? It has been excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one. Do we then nullify the Law through faith? Far from it! On the contrary, we establish the Law.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭3‬:‭27‬-‭31‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Secondly, which law is Paul establishing? He tells us in verse 27, the Law of faith not the law of works (OT law including the 1v commandments). Why? Because Paul tells us in Gal.3:12 that the law is NOT of faith.

“However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, “The person who performs them will live by them.””
‭‭Galatians‬ ‭3‬:‭12‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Without the Law... there is no sin Rom 4, and no need for grace or the gospel
Follow the verses in Rom. 4. What is Paul talking about when he says that where there is no law there is no sin?

“For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith. For if those who are of the Law are heirs, then faith is made void and the promise is nullified; for the Law brings about wrath, but where there is no law, there also is no violation. For this reason it is by faith, in order that it may be in accordance with grace, so that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, (as it is written: “I have made you a father of many nations”) in the presence of Him whom he believed, that is, God, who gives life to the dead and calls into being things that do not exist. In hope against hope he believed, so that he might become a father of many nations according to that which had been spoken, “So shall your descendants be.” Without becoming weak in faith he contemplated his own body, now as good as dead since he was about a hundred years old, and the deadness of Sarah’s womb; yet, with respect to the promise of God, he did not waver in unbelief but grew strong in faith, giving glory to God, and being fully assured that what God had promised, He was able also to perform. Therefore it was also credited to him as righteousness. Now not for his sake only was it written that it was credited to him, but for our sake also, to whom it will be credited, to us who believe in Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead, He who was delivered over because of our wrongdoings, and was raised because of our justification.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭4‬:‭13‬-‭25‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Paul uses the example of Abraham. Look at the verse that follows, for this reason it is by faith, in order to be in accordance with grace thst the promise is guaranteed to all. By the wrath of the law the promise was guaranteed to no one. The law is not of faith and not in accordance to grace. Now, follow the verses until it tells you why. Abraham faith was credited to him as righteousness the same way that the believers faith is credited as righteousness through Jesus sacrifice on the cross BECAUSE of our wrongdoing. The result of this faith is justification.

Do you know what justification is? Here it is:

“On account of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the demands of the law of God are met, and believers are granted the status of being righteous in the sight of God.

Justification is grounded in the death of Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ’s death shields believers from God’s wrath Ro 5:9 See also Ro 3:24; 4:25; 5:18; 1Pe 2:24

Jesus Christ’s death fulfils the demands of the law of God Ro 8:3-4 See also Ro 3:25-26; Gal 3:13; 1Jn 2:2

Justification is grounded in the resurrection of Jesus Christ Ro 4:25; 10:9-10 See also Ac 2:22-39; 4:10-12; 17:30-31; 1Pe 3:18-21

Justification means believers are reckoned as righteous through the death of Jesus Christ Ro 5:19; 1Co 1:30; 2Co 5:21 See also 1Co 6:9-11; Php 3:8-9 The term “imputation” is used to refer to the process by which God treats believers as being righteous in his sight on account of Jesus Christ’s death.

Justification is received by faith Ro 1:17 pp Gal 3:11 See also Hab 2:4; Ro 5:1; Eph 2:8

The example of Abraham Ge 15:6 See also Ro 4:1-5,9-22; Gal 3:6-9,16-18

The example of David Ro 4:6-8; Ps 32:1-2

Manser, Martin H. 2009. Dictionary of Bible Themes: The Accessible and Comprehensive Tool for Topical Studies. London: Martin Manser.


What are the results of justification?

Justification brings a changed relationship with God and a future hope. It will also bring a change in behaviour.

Peace with God, access to his presence and the hope of his glory Ro 5:1-2 See also Ro 8:30; Tit 3:7

Assurance of forgiveness Ro 5:9; Eph 1:13-14

Knowing Jesus Christ and participating in his resurrection Php 3:10-11 See also Ro 6:5

Freedom from condemnation Ro 8:31-34 See also Ro 8:1-4; Gal 3:13-14

Freedom from domination by sin Ro 6:14,17-18

Adoption into God’s family See also Ro 8:15-17; Gal 4:6-7

Righteousness in the sight of God Ro 5:17; Php 3:8-9 See also Ro 3:20-22; 1Co 1:30

Justification must lead to good works Jas 2:24 See also Ro 6:15-18; Gal 5:13-16; Jas 2:14-26


Manser, Martin H. 2009. Dictionary of Bible Themes: The Accessible and Comprehensive Tool for Topical Studies. London: Martin Manser.

The law does not justify so why would I want to be under the law? We were put to death in regard to the law. We belong to Christ who died for the propitiation of our sins. We have been released from the law.

“Therefore, my brothers and sisters, you also were put to death in regard to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might belong to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God. For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were brought to light by the Law, were at work in the parts of our body to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭7‬:‭4‬-‭6‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

So again, Why would we need the law if we have something much better?
Upvote 0

NBC: Gov. Abbott asks USDA to approve waiver banning junk food purchases with SNAP benefits

The price per oz. is the actual cost. I love unit pricing; it saves both time and money.

In both examples, the more processed foods cost less per oz.

But barely...

Is someone really noticing a fraction of an ounce difference per serving?
Upvote 0

Harvard conservative magazine is suspended by its own board after publishing article laced with Nazi rhetoric

Good for you?

Would it make you happier if I called it hate speech instead of racism? 'Cuz we can go with that. "Zero to racism" just had a better ring to it than "Zero to hate speech".
Islamic religious legislation has codes on what to do if a child bride's 3-hole is raped into a 1-hole. https://archive.ph/cMraI

What is you opinion on forcing this culture between the legs of the culture that ended the Holocaust and gave us Winnie-the-Pooh while they loudly scream no and try to get away?
Upvote 0

Supreme Court rejects Kim Davis’ request to reconsider landmark gay marriage ruling

Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty and committed abomination before Me; therefore I took them away as I saw fit. - Ezekiel 16:49-50

So because they didn't care for the poor and needy? That sounds like Jesus, doesn't it?


How am I persecuted if two women get married?
> and committed abomination before Me
>and committed abomination before Me
>and committed abomination before Me

It's been used by bourgeois perverts with upper-class vices to oppress proletariot cake-bakers and florists. It's completely forbidden in Scripture, but I don't force things people view as sinful on them even if I personally don't think it is. A close friend irl is Latin and our group can't always hang out over ice cream when she's on a fast day.

This issue has been used to deChristianize the country and get rid of the basis of conscience-freedom which undergirds all of our other freedoms. It's also opened the door to polygamy and the sexualization of children.

The filter for God's mark in Ezekiel is "mourning over abominations" (rather than "parading their sin like Sodom.) If you look at this stuff and don't grieve over it, you may not be in a good case.
  • Like
Reactions: Delvianna
Upvote 0

"[T]his may be interpreted allegorically"

On the contrary, a Christological-prophetic interpretation of certain OT texts insulates us from heresy.

We know from Luke 24 that the Old Testament is entirely a prophecy of Christ - most forms of recent error stem from literal-historical readings of the Old Testament that do not directly relate to God’s economy of salvation through His incarnation in the person of the Son and Word, Christ our God.

Conversely, Nestorianism resulted from the coercive implementation in tne Patriarchate of Constantinople of the literal-historical exegesis of Theodore of Mopsuestia.

Of course, Theodore’s interpretation of Scripture, although literal, would come across as alien to modern ears.

I would note that the best Church Fathers used both literal and Christological-prophetic interpretations of the Old Testament, while leaning towards literalism in the New Testament.

Many of our worst modern errors come from non-literal allegorical eisegesis of New Testament pericopdes, for example, the use of Mark 7 contra 1 Corinthians 11:2 and 2 Thessalonians 2:15 to attack the tradition of the Catholic Church, the use of 2 Peter to attack the Epistles of St. Paul whenever one disagrees with them, the claim Christ our God was only allegorically speaking of His flesh and blood in the Institution Narrative in 2 Corinthians 11 and the Synoptics and John ch. 6 and the related claim that Baptism of the Spirit excludes baptism in water, the claim of credobaptists that statements of entire households being baptized were not literally true, and the claim of liberal Christians that St. Paul’s statements on sexual morality are not to be taken literally.

To my knowledge, only five denominational groups, plus isolated churches in other denominations, namely - the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholics, High Church / Anglo Catholic Anglicans of the Continuing Anglican / GAFCON / conservative alignment, and Confessional Lutherans of the Orthodox Evangelical Catholic alignment such as my friends @MarkRohfrietsch @ViaCrucis and @Ain't Zwinglian have managed to avoid these errors (partially in the case of Roman Catholics as there are liberals vying for control such as the German bishops).
I agree, for the most part. Implemented correctly, the use of allegory can be highly beneficial. However, it is a very slippery slope for some and I have encountered many truly amazing allegorical interpretations of scripture which hardly align with orthodox teaching.

As for the Bavarian bishops, you probably know their history. Bavarian Catholicism has had a curious relationship with Rome for a very long time. When the unification of Germany was accomplished by Otto Von Bismarck, the Bavarian Catholics found themselves as relative aliens in a Lutheran and Reformed conglomerate. In any event, we shall see how Pope Leo relates to them. Hopefully, truth and peace will prevail.
Upvote 0

The Schumer Shutdown

Obama and Democrats initially avoided the term, preferring "Affordable Care Act," but by 2012, Obama embraced it to neutralize the criticism, saying, "You want to call it Obamacare? That's okay, because I do care.

You said he didn't want his name on a failing venture which is why it was called the ACA. That is false.
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

What happens if someone dies before they became a believer, is it their fault?

Consider that most people are born and grow with a question in their mind what this is all about and is there more. This starts a journey which will or at least should either lead them into the world or away from it. Whether they find Christianity is irrelevant. it is the truth of the Father that matters and it won't be found in the traditional ways of mankind. Turning from the adversarial self-serving ways of man and elohim is key and in that lies salvation. People around the world can by choice discover and live by the golden rule,
Upvote 0

Fannie Mae watchdogs looked into how Pulte got Democrats' mortgage records - report

"Mortgage records" is a very broad term, and that article is exceedingly non-specific. The actual information that is recorded is the final mortgage contract and deed (I looked mine up - that's all that's there). It does not include the application(s) or any other ancillary forms submitted during the process. Considering that at least some of the claims made against James involved her applications, there was at least some non-public information in Pulte's hands.
still waiting for proof that is came from Fannie Mae - the lender - or even proof she used fannie mae.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,086
Messages
65,412,122
Members
276,361
Latest member
A_Christian88