• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Miraculous Medal Novena

Day 7... 11/24/25

O Immaculate Virgin Mary, Mother of Our Lord Jesus and our Mother, penetrated with the most lively confidence in your all-powerful and never-failing intercession, manifested so often through the Miraculous Medal, we your loving and trustful children implore you to obtain for us the graces and favors we ask during this Novena, if they be beneficial to our immortal souls, and the souls for whom we pray.

(Privately form your petitions here.)

You know, O Mary, how often our souls have been the sanctuaries of your Son who hates iniquity. Obtain for us, then, a deep hatred of sin and that purity of heart, which will attach us to God alone so that our every thought word and deed may tend to his greater glory. Obtain for us also a spirit of prayer and self-denial, that we may recover by penance what we have lost by sin, and at length attain to that blessed abode where you are the Queen of angels and of men. Amen.
Upvote 0

Is gambling sinful?

I have only gambled very small amount of money $2, the excitement of the chance to win big was there, I wasn't really disappointed it was $2 not enough to buy a bag of chips these days. I figured i'm not lucky and moved on.

I can see how it can develop into a problem with people gambling excessive amounts of money, and they are devastated. But what about gambling such small amount of money it has no effect at all to the person who lost?

Could a Christian also ever be involved in the gambling business? Although some people move on, for others it destroys lives and they wished they never gambled. or is gambling seen as a legitimate business just like farmers?

In general, it's not the easiest question to answer, because you can look at the situation from different sides. And with time, the gambling sphere changes and evolves, so that now you can play without using real money. I always keep an eye on the latest casino offers and promotions because I’m curious about how these platforms work. Some casinos, especially online ones, are licensed and regulated, offering various bonuses, free spins, and games in a controlled environment. While exploring these sites, I found a trusted source where I found info about casinos where you can try free spins without depositing money, a low-risk way to experience online gambling. You can check out more about these no-deposit bonuses. I think that may be a good idea for people who wants to play with no risk.
I don’t think the issue is the $2 itself. Many people try a small bet occasionally and walk away without any problems. The real concern is when gambling becomes a habit, starts pulling someone in, or turns into something they rely on for excitement or hope.
I don't gamble, well, I tried a few times, but it's not really for me. I don't have anything against people who play casino games, but as long as it doesn't cause problems.
Upvote 0

The NEA is pushing far left teaching upon children

(Who neglected to mention that in centuries past it was considered akin to prostitution for women to be actors; and thus why female parts were played by men!)
I'm sure there were many irrelevant things about history I neglected to mention. Not sure why it matters to the subject at hand, however.

…. Example of when “drag” isn’t exactly “drag”; particularly when male actors only dressed as women in theatre performances and didn’t walk around in the streets trying to pass as women.
Drag queens are performers, and they are not trying to "pass as women" at all. The exaggerated style of dress and makeup, largely derived from Commedia del'arte, attests to that. What they may or may not choose to do in their spare time off the stage is their own business, of course. But the subject was society's acceptance of drag or cross dressing in general, and clearly, it has accepted both for most of human history.

If you're trying to make some other point here, it eludes me. Maybe you could explain it better?

-- A2SG, if you care to....
Upvote 0

CNN Dem Panelist Shocks Jennings with Major Admission on Lawfare Against Trump

Which are? I'm serious here, what are these things because I'm not sure what you are referring to. And is this just one or two things or are you claiming this about all accusations?
Its not just about Trump or any side.I don't want to get into who is the worst or which side does what.

Its a general observation of public and political life. It seems people are so busy judging and pointing out other peoples wrongs that they forget that they are sinners as well. Usually one of the signs which Christ pointed out in the Pharisees was judging others. Making a noise about how wrong others were.

This was a sign that the person doing the judging was actually doing so to hide their own corrupted heart. This is a psychological principle that usually when people are fixating on particular wrong behaviour its because they recognise it from their own mindset. When they are disturbed to the point where they are affected. The problem is usually in the person who is making the issue out of it.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

If we do discuss the Atlantean nonsense and orgins of your ancient advanced tech sources, will you honestly deal with them, or will you deflect?
I am not sure what you meran by deflect. Deflect into what lol. Into something like the Atlantis myth. Why would I do that and make it even worse for myself lol. You grossly underestimate those who can understand the difference.

But yes I am able to discuss the Atlantis legend if you want and its context to the difference between the science and the legend.
Please stop quoting fallacies. You don't seem to know what they are.
This was based on the fact that the idea of Atlantis as a conspiracy is being used to dismiss everything any person who may be associated with such conspiracies as wrong in everything they say. A sort of coverall to automatically dismiss the person without actually investigating what they said.

It is a fact that you have dismissed everyone and what they actually have said without knowing what they have said on this by the fact you called them all grifters without any evidence.
Plato made up "Atlantis" as a morality tale.
The bible made up the Flood myth as a moral tale. But it still had a real event as the basis. This is how it works. Moral tales come from real events percieved as from the gods or mother nature. Thats what gives them legs. Otherwise its just some unbelievable tale with no real substance.

Throughout time we see the same theme over and over of a great city or culture or Empire failing or destroyed because of their hubris and pride.

It makes perfect sense that there was such a legend or a number or glocal and local stories floating around that was used in other ways with a similar moral lesson. Which PLato an dothers drew upon. It makes sense that just like the Flood myths are based on real flood events in all cultures. That from those flood myths could come a great city or culture that was destroyed. A moral lesson within a lesson.
Connolly made up most of the modern version whole cloth from his fantastical understanding of prehistoric Ameria. Neither is based on any historical event.
Yeah the same theme is elaborated on over and over. But this stems from a real event sometime in the past. Give enough time and the worldwide tsuami we had a decade ago will become something sent by the gods. The story is probably being laid down within the cultures that directly experienced it. In fact if you listen to their accounts many say it was the gods being angry.

This is a natural inclination of humans.
You keep mentioning conspiracy theories. No one is talking about conspiracy theories. There is no "conspiracy" I am claiming is being made about the past. Just a lot of liars, fools, and grifters.
Yes they are. You started with the idea its all conspiracy suggesting there was alternative or advanced lost knowledge. Full stop.

You labelled it all as conspiracies like Atlantis and aliens and those who are investigating such possibilities are grifters and liars and fools. Without any evidence direct from those you accuse actually promoting such things.

Therefore I have been from the start of this thread having to defend these good people from your stereotypical labels and false accusations.
I don't find the myths interesting, nor do I think they have any real probative value in understanding the past. The understanding of ancient myths and beliefs are only interesting to the extent that peoples of the time motivated them in the past.
So you are more or less dismissing a good chunk of science in how we can understand the ancients and their culture and knowledge. Your more or less saying we should only understand them from a 21st century worldview and not how they believed and thought.

How can you even come to understand them by know knowing their worldview. Or not understand human cognition and behaviour in this context as a behavioural science. They are not machines and this is I think the missing aspect that material sciences dismiss. The agencies and self determinant aspects that come from culture such as belief and spirituality.
This is becoming clear.
Not in the way your making out. Its extreme and narrow minded. As much as any conspiracy.
And you don't see the problem in basing information on the work of a liar?
I am able to take what I think makes sense or is supported and leave that which I think is not. You don't have to throw the baby out with the bath water. Often much of what is said is reasonable and something we should question and consider. Its not that controversial.

But because this entire topic can so easily slip into spectulation the two get conflated. Thus throwing out the legitimate. Unfortunately some people give this whole topic a bad name.
This isn't about UFOs or DNA.
You literally just agree that the whole UAP and advance tech related to this thread.
He says that, but he is one of the flakiest of them all. Only Dunn has him beaten on that front. When I was trying to view some of the "Michael Button" content, "UnchartedX" kept appearing in the side feed with woo nonsense about a variety of subjects, not just Egyptology.
And you did not check it out to actually see what it was about. This only shows you tar people by association. You also don't believe peoples own words. So why should anyone then believe yours. Is this not just personal feelings and beliefs.
That seems to be his grift or his delusion. I'm not going to take the time to figure out if he is a liar or just a true believer.
Your just proving my point.
Frankly it should. If anyone claims to love ancient history and adores the work of Graham "The Fraud" Hancock, then they are just not credible on ancient history. Again, I don't care if they are just brainwashed members of the Hancock cult, or fellow grifters.
Fair enough
It is not an ad hom to note that someone making claims about area X is involved with people doing very unsavory things in area X. It is no different than dismissing a "financial advisor" who professes admiration for propagators of Ponzi schemes.
It is when your not providing evidence. Anyone can make accusations. Its easy. You just say the words enough.
You just told me you don't care if they are Hancock acolytes or not. Why should I bother at this point? Are you going to listen?
Its more the principle that you so easily dismiss people based on heresay and not actually getting to know them or what they actually said. You were dismissing for the beginning of everyone and everything. You had already made your mind up before you walked in the front door lol.
No one is discussing conspiracies.
Hum thats what you have called everything posted lol. You have constantly tied it back to Hancock and Dunn as representing everything said.
Upvote 0

The Ancient of Days

What an interesting question. I never even heard of, 'Ancient of Days,' until they sang it in a church song, recently, and I had to look it up in the bible to see where the phrase came from because family was asking me to whom it referred.

I assumed God but that was based on the lyrics of the song and the scripture I referred to at the time.
Your assumption was correct .. it does refer to God, and not the Son of Man / Messiah.
Upvote 0

Do you keep the Sabbath? (poll)

I wasn't around in the 1860 so I wasn't preaching anything in the 1800's. If you mean the SDA church, we were not the first ones to keep the Ten Commandments including the Sabbath either, that we can find right in our Bibles. God has always had a remnant people all throughout the centuries who kept God's commandments the way He said including the Sabbath. You keep looking at people as if that is our authority when we need to be looking at God. God's people will always be a remnant compared to the majority Rev12:17 Mat7:13-14. Not because God does not call on everyone Heb3:7-19, sadly few hear.

Whenever God's people would go away from the word of God, He would always raise up a messenger to bring people back to His word (until there is no more remedy) 2 Chro 36:16 God does not change. God never ordained Sunday, that is a commandment of the Catholic church. They even admit so that they changed God's Sabbath commandment (as we were foretold it would be changed not by God Dan7:25), based on their authority over God's.






The whole nonsense that the CC are the succession from the apostles, if that were true they would have continued on what the apostles did and that was to keep God's Sabbath and obey God and stay faithful to Him. The apostles warned us what would happen after their departure Acts 20:29 which sadly is exactly what happened- men turned to fables instead of staying faithful to God. 2Tim4:3-4

You point back to Catholic doctrine to support your doctrine. You allow the catholic church to define what things mean, instead of allowing God to. God never said we needed a mediator or an earthy priesthood, He did away with both and we can go directly to Him. I would hate to place my faith in my church instead of with Jesus Christ, when Jesus said He is the way John14:6 not the catholic church, that's a lot of trust built on man-made traditions instead of building on our Rock which is Jesus by doing what He says.

Luke 6:46 “But why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say? 47 Whoever comes to Me, and hears My sayings and does them, I will show you whom he is like: 48 He is like a man building a house, who dug deep and laid the foundation on the rock. And when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently against that house, and could not shake it, for it was [j]founded on the rock. 49 But he who heard and did nothing is like a man who built a house on the earth without a foundation, against which the stream beat vehemently; and immediately it [k]fell. And the ruin of that house was great.”

Col 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.

Christ is the one speaking the Ten Commandments. Christ is the one who put them under His mercy seat. Christ is the one who sanctified the seventh day Gen2:3 Exo20:11 and told us to keep it holy Exo20:8-11 that He made it for us Mat2:27 Isa59:2 Isa56:6 and sanctifies us when we follow what He asks Eze20:12. Christ is the one who blesses us when we obey Him Isa56:2 Rev22:14 Keeping the Sabbath comes with the power of Christ- the only God who can create heaven and earth Exo20:11 Rev14:7 the only God who can sanctify Exo20:11 Eze20:12 and without His blessings Isa59:2 Exo20:11 Rev22:14 sadly, we really are nothing, we need Him for everything Eze20:20 I would not trade all the promises God gives us through His Sabbath for something that Jesus warned about following mans traditions over the commandments of God, laying them aside as to tell Him No Lord, these are not for me, making His word of no effect, I will seek out my own sanctification, just as those who came before us Eze 20:12-13 Eze20:16 and what that does to Him. Mark7:7-13 Mat15:3-14 Eze22:26


Guess it will get sorted out at His soon return.
So your contention is that God’s Church is invisible? The Church we see in all of history is not real? It’s just made up because it does not pass your judgement on the Sabbath?

I feel bad that you do not see at this time how arrogant your position is. God’s Church is not invisible and she is not subject to the judgements of men.
Scripture even warns if they tell you behold he is here in secret chambers, believe it not


You are betting your eternal life not on the word of God but your own judgement of what the word of God is. We can read the Apostolic preaching and it does not say what you say.
Upvote 0

We Made The New York Times

They dismiss the historical claims against Stalin, or minimize them and blame underlings for actual evils acknowledged.

Because we all know it was Molotov, Kaganovich, Malenkov and Kruschev who were responsible for all evil in the Soviet Union, under the guidance of Trotsky, who doubtless faked his assasination in 1938 and secretly ruled over the Gulags from an underground lair in the mountains of Kyrgyztan, which Beria’s forces had successfully located at the time of Stalin’s brutal assassination by the doctors entrusted to care for him in 1953, which is doubtless why Beria was defamed and purged.

The sad thing is the satirical quote I just made is likely believed by some of these people.

They accuse anyone who disagrees of being a victim of Western propaganda. The need to think their country both great (true in any event) and generally innocent of the charges of great evils by its regimes (not at all true) drives them to this.

The tragedy is that it was the militant atheists of the Communist Party and the Soviet education system who taught them to think like this, indeed, rewarded them for thinking this way. Even though they are unaware of it, because Stalin was declasse by the time they were educated, but the ideas and methodology satirized by Orwell were still being used in all Communist dictatorship (and still are in use in Communist-occupied China, Cuba and North Korea and various Latin American regimes). And in Russia the pro-Stalinist faction is propagating this distorted form of “reasoning” to younger generations.
Upvote 0

Can not being in the correct denomination cause someone to not be saved?

but His church had nothing at all to do with buildings are creeds, least of all cults or denominations.

On the contrary, the Church established by Christ did compile the Symbol of Faith at the Council of Nicaea and refine it at Constantinople in 381.

That refined version is part of the Statement of Faith of CF.com and is unitive, not divisive, because the Nicene Creed is something all our members, from Eastern Orthodox to Evangelical, from Lutheran to Catholic, from Presbyterian to Anglican, and from Non-Denominational to Oriental Orthodox, can agree with, while at the same time ensuring cults such as the J/Ws, Mormons, Christian Science, Unitarians et al are excluded (since the defining characteristic of what we now call a cult, that is to say, heresy, is denial of the Incarnation of God in the person of Christ and rejection of the Trinity and other principles of the Nicene Creed.

Occasionally we have someone join who doesn’t bother reading the Statement of Faith, and no one would ever know except such members will immediately attack the faith of the Nicene churches, especially the more traditional ones like Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans, Eastern Orthodox, Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Methodists, Oriental Orthodox, Moravians, et cetera, with intensity.
Upvote 0

"Don't Give up the Ship"

Perhaps they ought to have - all we got were the John Yoo torture memo and the Abu Ghraib prosecutions.

People were arrested for pacifism during WWI.

Remember, "Mine is not to question why; mine is but to do or die"?
I have no idea what you are trying to prove with this post.
Upvote 0

B flat B♭

I didn't claim to have done that. I don't claim even to have read the 442,000 posts that you have agreed are actually on that forum. Indeed, I specifically said that I was referring only to the posts on the page that your link took me to. I wrote: "Well, there were none at all that said that on the page you linked to."

Sorry - My mistake I thought you were referring to the Icke thread.
  • Like
Reactions: David Lamb
Upvote 0

BBC apologizes for edit of Trump speech

i don't understand why it took 2 years to figure this deception out.
I credit the Telegraph for even bringing this to light. Else the memo would have languished within the BBC like an open secret no one wants to talk about.

I heard somewhere when I was just listening to Youtube that one Youtuber said this happened when you let the narrative set the truth not the truth setting the narrative. Paraphrasing as I can't recall who said it and how exactly it was said. But his point was poignant and salient.
Upvote 0

Church is boring

I haven’t been going to church in a while. I feel like it’s boring. I find myself daydreaming and the sermons are good, but I really don’t like to sing or stand up. I like just saying prayers and even though the sermons are good, I don’t feel like going. I’m not really getting anything out of the Bible study, either, which is online. When I do go to church, I do tithe.
Am I falling away or is this not the right church for me? The people are nice.
I understand what you mean. However, worshipping God and hearing His word preached in the company of other Christians surely should not be seen in terms of our likes and dislikes, but in obeying God. You say that you don't like to sing or to stand up, but far more important, is the church that you go to, and maybe are a member of, a biblical one? In other words, does it order its worship and other activities according to God's word? If it does, then ask for God's help to overcome your dislikes. If it doesn't, I suggest you seek His help in finding a biblical church.
Upvote 0

No person can come to Christ by their own freewill !

All men are drawn.
Many men are called, few chosen.
We are not coerced
Our response is our choice.
'Choose this day who you will serve.'
'Open the door and I will come in and sup with you.'
It isn't complicated.
But in their context, the words 'Choose this day who you will serve.' were spoken to God's chosen people of Old Testament times, not to sinners in general, and 'Open the door and I will come in and sup with you.' is a paraphrase of this verse, spoken to a church, the church of the Laodiceans:

““Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with him, and he with Me.” (Re 3:20 NKJV)

Again, not an invitation to sinners to open the door of their hearts to Jesus.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,631
Messages
65,421,201
Members
276,392
Latest member
EasternOrthodoxBayArea