Had Mary guessed about resurrection ?
- By peter2
- Christian Scriptures
- 10 Replies
Thank you, samaus 1-9, for these informationchat GPT
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thank you, samaus 1-9, for these informationchat GPT
What hole in the North Pole? If it's black, how does your supposed "black sun" shine? Where does the bible tell us that God created the ordinary sun and a black sun? What is the reference to either the black sun or its sign (not sure which you meant) representing "an inward-turning power or a secret foundation of existence" supposed to mean? There is no secret foundation of existence. Everything that exists was created by God.It is based under the hole of the North Pole it rays shine forth to give us our moon phases & eclipses.
It's more intricate than this.
This is the sign for the Black Sun.
View attachment 374334
It signifies a hidden or inverted source of energy, a buried star that represents an inward-turning power or a secret foundation of existence.
The Black Sun is reference to certain eclipses.
Yes behold. Right out of the gate, the disinformation from your uncited source glares with blinding brilliance.Behold:
I don't know what your motive is for rejecting what God has said, but I can only imagine it's because you don't like the awful truth so you feel the need to reject and twist it and make it say something different.I was simply pointing out that Peter and Jesus' teaches that God gives His Spirit to those who obey Him. You know this you say, but still teach a different gospel.
I think Jesus warned His People not to do such things.
This would be those who called Jesus Lord, Lord, and were "very much aware" of what Jesus and Peter taught, but lived by another gospel, Yes?
Here, let me show you the words of someone who claims they no longer need Him. "That's right I don't need Jesus or His warnings, because I already have Him."
Well it's for sure someone's "theology is riddled with inconsistencies".
There are lots of folks who call Jesus Lord, Lord, who claim to be the very elect. Paul warned that the Law and Prophets was written specifically for our admonition, the "our" here being those who "by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality". (Rom. 2:7)
He specifically pointed out who needs to take heed.
Wherefore let him that "thinketh he standeth" take heed lest he fall. (1 Cor. 10:1-12)
I don't believe Paul was "twisting Gods Word upside down" here, any more than I believe Peter was lying to us when HE told us who God gives His Holy Spirit to.
But clearly there are many "who come in Christ's Name" that imply in their theology that they did.
Again, you are promoting a religious philosophy taught to you by this world's religious system. If you were to actually read Paul's Words, and David's words that Paul quoted, you would find out who Paul and David were speaking to in this description.
If you were "Seeking the Righteousness of God", as the Jesus "of the bible" teaches, you would go to Psalms 5 and 14, and you would read Rom. 3 and see that Paul and David are speaking to those men who had the Oracles of God, but didn't believe them. Men that falsely accused Paul and the Body of Christ, "whose damnation is just". Men who "professed to know God, but were wicked, bloody and deceitful men". Men who God said, "who eat up my people as they eat bread", and "have shamed the counsel of the poor because the LORD is his refuge."
God can not be found in these people, rather, "God is in the generation of the righteous."
Your teaching that there isn't any difference between the children of the devil, and the Body of Christ is astounding, and yet this is a popular religious philosophy promoted by this world's religious system, "who calls Jesus Lord, Lord".
Paul asks the question, "What then? are we better than they?"
In other words, can I live by the same disobedience to God, engage in the same false accusations of others like the Pharisees, and not be judged the same by God? He answered, "No, in no wise: for we have "before proved" both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;"
And where did Paul "already Prove" this?
Rom. 2: 9 Tribulation and anguish, upon "every" soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;
10 But glory, honour, and peace, to "every man" that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:
11 For there is no respect of persons with God.
Paul didn't say, "We are all under sin". You say Paul and the Body of Christ are still under sin, but Paul didn't.
The preaching that God's Word teaches that Paul and the Body of Christ's "throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes" is an evil and wicked teaching. It is not true according to Paul's own words, David never promoting such wickedness, and the entire Bible exposes such a teaching as from below and not above.
Men don't "Seek God", as you don't by your own admission and neither did the Pharisees, for the same reason. Both have been convinced by "other voices" that they are all set, already heirs to the Kingdom of God, already the very elect, that "they shall surely not die". But the Jesus "of the Bible" teaches "But he that shall endure unto the end, the same "shall be saved"."
Heb. 11: 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder "of them that diligently seek him".
So yes, I diligently Seek Him every day.
Their refusal to admit that according to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 double taps are a war crime doesn't change that fact.If the person you're conversing with doesn't believe that war crimes or murder took place, then he's not defending that.
The thing is I know my country has been godawful to most of the world.Maybe he should focus on his own country’s history of slavery and conquest
Descriptions of the antediluvian world are hard to comprehend even for people that have spent a lifetime of formal study on the topic. Ascribing history level precision to every line of Moses' poems isn't something high level Christian academics do. Just a few chapters later you have the "table of nations" where fathers and sons are representing large groups of people.1 Cor 15:45 says otherwise "So it is written: 'The first man Adam became a living being'; the last Adam, a life-giving spirit".
Thats a terrible assumption to make. If you listen to her story you might realize she wrote to tell the story of the horrors of Islamism. Because she lived it. Would she be more believable if her story didn't make her book didn't sell?Do you have any testimonies from any ex-Muslims who aren't selling books? Fear sells and it seems every ex-Muslim that does these types of interviews is doing it for financial gain.
Yet they are bringing their extremism with them. There are two types of Islamists. There are the ones who use violence and force to bring change and those who wield the political sword to bring about their control and Islamic melding of church and state. At this point, in the west it is usually the latter with small doses of the former. They use the desire of westerners kindness and desire to be seen as good people against them. Trotting out the whole Islamophobia accusation against those who might have any issue with what they are doing. And people are not wanting to be accused of that will buckle under to avoid even the appearance of it. We saw this on full display when the poor pastor was raked over the coals with these accusations over his voicing of some concerns.I agree; however, the vast majority of Muslims are not Islamists, and those who are, especially in the West, do not support using violence to achieve political goals or change the style of government they live under. In fact, many of the Muslims migrating to the West are escaping from oppression and conflict by violent Islamists in their country. They don't want to bring what they are escaping from to where they are now.
I agree with some of what you write, and contest the rest. I learned a long time ago to read everything I can get on hands on. But the historic fact is that the Bible is the only reliable source. That's where I base my confidence, because it is the word of God. And many upon many facts back this up.And you would be extremely wrong to think that philosophy is, in whole, mutually exclusive to Christian theology.
You might want to keep in mind that, actually, the undertaking of biblical systematic theology REQUIRES the application of some points of the wide (very, very wide) field of Philosophy.
You would be right to say that I don't hold to Sola Scriptura, and I'd go on record to in fact say that in order to be saved, no one needs to. God is bigger than the rag tag collection of letters and books we call the New Testament, after all, and I'll continue to take my measures for what constitutes 'good theology' from many Christian scholars (and ministers) rather than ................... only one local minister.
According to your statement, in atheistic China, all Christians should submit to the communist party. In Nazi Germany, all Christians should submit to the National Socialist party. Do they make any sense??I know I am going to step on a lot of toes by saying this. But as Christians are we not supposed to be subject to the ordinances of man. The whole COVID rebellion in my opinion makes Christians look bad in the eyes of the world and makes people mistrust Christians.
Rom 13:1-2 Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.
I'm actually a registered democrat, who happens to be a die-hard Trump supporter.What is unusual about this thread is that, twenty years ago, when I used to debate with Democrats and liberals, they often held similar views. I never imagined that one day I would be debating these topics with registered Republicans.
But wait, it's Brazil that's part of BRICS, not Venezuela.This is about BRICS
But it is the Lord Who is said in Zechariah 14:12. Are you saying that God "most definitely" uses nuclear weapons?Nuclear weaponry most definitely
Zechariah 14:12
And this shall be the plague wherewith the Lord will smite the people that have fought against Jerusalem; their flesh still consume away while they stand on their feet, their eyes will consume away in their holes, and their tongues shall consume away in their mouths.
Sounds like the immediate effects of nuclear weaponry. And I noticed that some of the newer translations use the word rot, and there is a difference in rot and being consumed away while you stand on your feet, while standing on your feet means immediate action.
Your argument is built on emotion, not Scripture. You speak as though God is required to share your definition of justice. But if a human court can sentence someone to life imprisonment for a single crime, why is it “monstrous” for the holy Judge of all the earth to execute eternal judgment for a lifetime of willful rebellion against infinite holiness?Eternal torture, without mercy and without hope? Infinite punishment for finite crimes? That's isn't justice, that's simply cruelty for its own sake. The doctrine paints God as a monster, pitiless and infinitely cruel, condemning the majority of those He created to literally endless torture. No "Father, forgive them" anymore. it's "burn baby burn!" That's what y'all teach.