Lindsey Halligan, and the dog that ate the transcript.
- American Politics
- 11 Replies
I don't think there's reason to believe they were lying to the judge. As noted here:
![]()
Bondi’s Retroactive Ratificiation of Her Retroactive Ratification of the Comey Grand Jury Presentation | National Review
The attorney general tries for a second time to shore up Lindsey Halligan’s troubled appointment as prosecutor in the Comey and James cases.www.nationalreview.com
I assume the AG was not trying to mislead the court. She had no doubt reviewed the portion of the proceeding that had been transcribed earlier — the testimony of the sole witness presented. What was missing was the colloquy between the prosecutor and the grand jury, including legal instructions. Those are often not transcribed. The witness testimony is routinely transcribed because it is often turned over to the defense under discovery rules; the prosecutor’s interaction with the grand jury is recorded but often not transcribed — it’s not discoverable unless there is some colorable allegation of impropriety in the grand jury proceeding.
and
I am not implying that Halligan did something nefarious; I think she’s just inexperienced in the practice of criminal law. As I’ve explained, grand jury proceedings can get chaotic. That’s why most U.S. attorneys’ offices require new prosecutors to observe a few grand jury presentations, then do a few presentations of seemingly simple cases under the watchful eye of an experienced supervisor, before flying solo.
All of this seems to be more likely Halligan having never done a grand jury presentation before (or having prosecuted a case) and messing things up due to the inexperience than anyone actually trying to lie.
“The prosecutor’s statement ... may have reasonably set an expectation in the minds of the grand jurors that rather than the government bear the burden to prove Mr. Comey’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial, the burden shifts to Mr. Comey to explain away the government’s evidence,” Fitzpatrick wrote.
The judge said Halligan then made a second error behind closed doors by nudging grand jurors into indicting Comey by referencing evidence that she didn’t even present to them.' --NOTUS
I think it's a forgone conclusion that the case and Halligan are toast.
Upvote
0