• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Carcinophobia (Fear of Cancer)

It could be a word directed at you,
see, words people speak to you, like
'you are going to get sick'
'You lack memory'
'Cancer'

if that word enters you, it can happen it doesn't, but if a negative word enters you
it can have all kind of bad effects, including giving rights to the devil to torment.

If you have some communion with the Holy spirit, you could ask him if this is a word, and what word it was.
If the Holy spirit brings an idea of this to you, the rest is easy you just pray for it to go away.
Upvote 0

Are the Jews Israel, or is the church Israel? Or does it depend on the context of the passage?

The good olive tree is true Israel. We have been joined to them - the elect remnant according to grace. It is a spiritual Israeli tree. It is a believing tree. It is the household of faith from the beginning.
The text does not say that the good olive tree is Israel.

The good olive tree is people who believe God and are saved. Not any particular nation.
Upvote 0

Worst Possible Uses for AI imaginable

Ever hear of AI powered "Slaughter Bots?"
Nope, not those specific type.

When I saw the topic title, I immediately thought about giving some A.I. robots some cannons, swords, and machine guns. That’s just a great idea. :p (sarcasm intended) Or make some suicide bomber bots to take out my enemies muhaha.

Never mind the hacker-bots, sex-bots, and drug mule hauling bots of the future. How about an abortion robot A.I.? That sounds like about the worst use case possible.

Tunneling bot for prison escapes, remote A.I. helicopter for the same…there’s a lot of criminal potential for A.I. that hasn’t been explored yet, mostly because we don’t have gun-carrying humanoids yet. Once we do, the sky is the limit.
Upvote 0

Vatican stops use of titles for Mary

2 Tim 3:15 And because from thy infancy thou hast known the holy scriptures which can instruct thee to salvation by the faith which is in Christ Jesus.
3:16 All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice:

The Scriptures Timothy knew from his infancy ( most likely before Christ was crucified ) is the Tanakh. Paul COULD NOT be referring to the Bible. Paul was referring to the Tanakh.
There's also the question of what theopneustas means in context, because there is a good case to be made that prior to Origen the idea was a life-giving property to the texts which fits with Pauls focus on the usefulness of the Scriptures in pastoral service rather than a theory of inspiration. It is out-breath not in-breath.
  • Like
Reactions: The Liturgist

The Reality of Free Will

True free will requires the ability of one moral agent to make moral choices without coercion, constraints, or consequences imposed by another moral agent. Anything short of that is not "free will," but "volitional agency."
Free will doesn't require freedom from consequences, nor does it need to be absolute and without constraint. Coercion is also debateable, depending on whether it is resistable or irresistable. Free will just requires that the origin of the actions be in the person's will, rather than being something imposed upon them. So distinguishing between volitional agency and free will is an artificial one, as they amount to the same thing.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

With regards to the nonsense of the ancient Egyptians using pyramids to 'focus or amplify' electromagnetic energy, all objects including pyramids can exhibit electromagnetic resonances.
These resonances occur when an external electromagnetic wave matches one of the natural oscillation modes of the object.
In conductive materials this involves free electrons oscillating collectively while in insulating materials like limestone or granite, the response is much weaker and consists mainly of small polarization shifts rather than free electron motion.
At resonance the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation matches the frequency of the oscillating electrons or polarization shifts resulting in an increase in the amplitude of the oscillation.

The internal chambers of the Great Pyramid have different dielectric properties than the surrounding limestone and granite walls, so can alter the distribution of electromagnetic fields and support their own weak resonance modes. Inside the chambers, electromagnetic fields can form weak standing-wave patterns due to reflections off the walls to form constructive interference with the incident radiation creating regions where the field is slightly stronger and is normal cavity resonance found in any enclosed space.

It is blatantly obvious the ancient Egyptians were completely unaware of the physics by simply comparing the interiors of the Great Pyramid with the second largest pyramid that of Khafre.

pyramid_comp.png

Khafre’s pyramid contains intrusive tunnels created by tomb robbers but would show a far weaker electromagnetic field enhancement than Khufu’s because it lacks internal chambers and therefore dielectric discontinuities which cannot support internal standing-wave resonant modes.

If the ancient Egyptians were aware of the physics they would not have constructed Khafre’s pyramid with the internal chamber below the pyramid where enhancements would have been negligible.
Upvote 0

The Schumer Shutdown

The ACA is about as close to universal healthcare as you can get. That's why it cost so much. If we had actual universal healthcare as some other countries do, it would cost even more, and the quality of healthcare would plummet. You can ask residents of those other countries who come to the USA for healthcare all about it. The long wait times are enough to cause them to come here where it's not universal, but higher quality.
You apparently don't know anything about universal healthcare if you think the ACA somehow resembles it. This post is objectively wrong.

Universal Healthcare:
Covers everyone, regardless of income, employment, pre-existing conditions, or age.
Single system ensures no gaps in coverage.

ACA:
Expands coverage but does not cover everyone.
Many people still rely on private insurance or fall into gaps in Medicaid eligibility (especially in states that didn’t expand Medicaid).
Coverage is often tied to employment or eligibility for subsidies.

Universal Healthcare:
Typically government-administered (single-payer) or heavily regulated multi-payer system.
Government negotiates prices for hospitals, doctors, and drugs.

ACA:
Relies on private insurance companies.
Government sets rules and provides subsidies, but does not control hospital, doctor, or drug prices.

Universal Healthcare:
Uses centralized negotiation to control costs for services, medications, and procedures.
Administrative costs are low due to one system handling billing and claims.

ACA:
Does not regulate provider prices, so costs for premiums, deductibles, and medical services remain high.
Administrative costs stay high because multiple private insurers and billing systems are involved.

Universal Healthcare:
Funded by taxes (federal and sometimes state), rather than premiums alone.
Individuals do not pay separate premiums for essential coverage.

ACA:
Funded by premiums (from individuals and employers) plus taxes.
Subsidies help lower-income people afford premiums, but middle- and upper-income people often pay more out-of-pocket.

Universal Healthcare:
Entire population is pooled, so risk is spread across everyone.
People cannot be denied coverage, and coverage is lifelong.

ACA:
Risk is pooled within insurance markets, not nationally.
People can still face high deductibles, copays, and gaps in coverage if subsidies aren’t enough.

Universal Healthcare:
Simpler: one system handles enrollment, billing, and reimbursement.
Less paperwork for patients and providers.

ACA:
Complex: multiple private insurers, different plans, marketplaces, subsidies.
High administrative overhead, confusing enrollment, and claim disputes remain common.


The ACA is vastly different than universal healthcare. Hence why universal healthcare is cheap in every modern nation that uses it, while the ACA is not.
Upvote 0

What is the true congregation?

While I agree with you that there is 1 body of Christ and all who follow Jesus and his truth are within that, the problem is that there are teachings by other denominations that will not get people saved as they themselves aren't either. Just like Christ accused the Pharisees of leading people to damnation (Matthew 23:13, Matthew 23:15) there are groups of people doing the same. Which is why I don't subscribe to the idea that debating scripture is "dividing the body of Christ" when there are a lot of people who are false brothers based on their doctrine and technically then wouldn't be IN the body of Christ to begin with. So I think it's dangerous to consider every denomination as part of the body when for example, Mormons claim "Christianity" but clearly aren't in the body...
Delvianna, I agree. Many churches teach another Jesus and another gospel. The are about 45,000 different churches worldwide and are separated from each other over doctrine. I read in scripture that there is only one body or church, not 45,000. If you would try to find the “true church“ from among these 45,000 and would thoroughly study each one for only one day it would take you 125 years to cover them all. You would be dead and never find the true church unless you were able to cover them all. I read in scripture that of our own selves we cannot choose GOD or Jesus, they must choose us. We can’t by our own choice join GODS church, GOD must put us in. Are not Christians called and chosen ? Aren’t Christians called the elect of GOD ? They way Christians are called and chosen is somewhat similar to Paul's experience on the road to Damascus. This is how I was converted, it came as a big surprise and something I didn’t plan because I was involved in one of these 45,000 churches at the time. The call was to come out of them and be you separate, touch not the unclean thing and I will receive you. I obeyed this call and then I was chosen. This was all GOD and Christs doing not mine.
  • Like
Reactions: Delvianna
Upvote 0

Trump pardons Giuliani, Sidney Powell, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, all fake electors for their attempt to overturn 2020 election, pardon official says

Yes ... our elections should be a high priority and everything possible should be put in place to ward off "interference" and so far that has not been done. Ending mail in voting and requiring proper ID would help.
Neither would help.
Upvote 0

Refuting Losing Salvation!

We are "walking as He walked" (1Jo 2:6), when we are about the Father's business (Luk 2:49).
According to the Scriptures, we walk as He walked when we follow in His example that He set forth for us 1John2:6 1 Peter 2:21-22 So how did Jesus live what did He teach this is the faith we are to have, not just faith in Jesus, but the faith of Jesus Rev14:12
Upvote 0

The 2025 Government Shutdown Thread

Have you considered smaller insurers?
Smaller insurers have a smaller risk pool by nature. Therefore, they must either be very choosy about who they accept (which is problematic for people with, say, pre-existing conditions) or charge a lot of money for their premiums because they lack the leverage to negotiate with providers and don't have a large pool of insured individuals to spread costs among. While they might be a good option for some people, they can't (and won't) insure everyone.
Free competition is the key,
The problem is that health insurance (and healthcare in general) doesn't operate on free market principles. You can't shop around for the best price or highest-rated hospital when you're having a heart attack or you suddenly go into labor or you run over your foot with a lawnmower. On the insurance side of things, as I said, smaller companies have to cut coverage or limit access in order to compete on price with the giant conglomerates. While that may look like a "free market" at a glance, offering lesser coverage (e.g. a catastrophic coverage policy rather than full coverage) or blocking the guy who has a family history of colon cancer is not something that we should be aspiring to.

Realistically, if you have the principle that everyone should receive medical care if and when they need it, the only thing that makes sense is a single-payer, government-run system.
Blacks Lives Matter, for example, can offer their members health care and share the cost between members. They can cap the salary of a CEO at $100,000 and put it in their bylaws that every employee must make at least half of the salary of the CEO in order to keep costs affordable for patients. Anyone can incorporate and offer those same salaries and go into health insurance only, with a goal of making health insurance affordable for everyone.
What's the incentive for that? The government has a good reason to want a healthy population, but a private corporation? Please. Moreover, it's far from simple to run such a company.
A person should be able to CHOOSE insurance from companies other than the ones Obama and Pelosi decided to favor.
The ACA does not restrict what companies are permitted to participate in the marketplace. They must offer plans that meet certain standards (e.g. no rejecting people based on pre-existing conditions, no lifetime benefit caps, etc), but there's nothing that says that Joe & Mary's Family Insurance Co. can't list their plans on the marketplace. The main reason why you only see plans from the "big, fat, rich insurance companies" on the marketplace is because they have a huge risk pool, and thus can offer better rates for plans that meet the ACA standard. And people buying their plans on the marketplace are going to look at two seemingly identical plans and pick the one that costs $500 less per month.
Upvote 0

Federal judges block Texas from using its new US House map in the 2026 midterms

Some tidbits from the outvoted 5th Circuit judge

When a judge warns readers to “Fasten your seatbelts!” before a 104-page legal diatribe — best to buckle up.

[Judge Jerry] Smith, on the losing end of that 2-1 ruling, attacked the plaintiffs as tools of left-wing donors George and Alex Soros, who featured at least 17 times in the ruling.

While dissenting judges typically refer obliquely to the “majority” opinion, Smith’s relentlessly personal and withering opinion [used opinion author Judge] Brown’s name more than 360 times, often accompanied by colorful insults.

Smith lit into Brown as an “unskilled magician” who “prefers living in fantasyland.” Smith said Brown committed “pernicious judicial misbehavior” by racing to issue his opinion. Brown emphasized [this] was intended to allow Texas leaders to return to the state’s earlier congressional boundaries before a Dec. 8 deadline for candidates to declare their bids for Congress.

“Whether Judge Brown likes it, gravity exists,” Smith wrote.

Although judges typically couch their deliberations in a veil of secrecy, Smith revealed them in great detail, even quoting from the text of email exchanges with Brown as the ruling was being prepared.
  • Haha
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Anti-Muslim Bigotry Directed at Mamdani

I'm not all that concerned about "the Islam" factor of Mamdani.

If he was actually devout, then that may be some cause for concern, but given his political stances (both social and economic) he's clearly not a devout adherent to Islam.

In that debate between him, Cuomo, and that "Guardian Angel" wanna-be, he openly admitted to patronizing legal pot dispensaries, and his position on LGBTQ issues are pretty well-known, so clearly he's not that "strict".
Upvote 0

Did the beginning of the IDL change the beginning of the Jewish Sabbath?

Two people celebrating the Sabbath together in the Holy land. Then one travels west, the other travels east.

The one traveling west will celebrate about an hour later for each thousand miles they travel. The one traveling east, about an hour earlier.

When they meet up on the opposite side of the earth, they will be celebrating the Sabbath a day apart.

I love you all!
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,444
Messages
65,417,761
Members
276,384
Latest member
CLEEB