-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Bioluminescence
- By rockytopva
- Physical & Life Sciences
- 14 Replies
The chemistry behind bioluminescence is actual quite complicated... The key chemicals are luciferin (which acts as a fuel) and luciferarce (which acts as a spark).- Living Light: The Mechanisms and Diversity of Bioluminescence - Apologetics Press
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History
- By stevevw
- Physical & Life Sciences
- 1399 Replies
Yes and they are saying that these discoveries are as they say rewriting and reshaping our understanding of human evolution and development. Being far more sophisticated in knowledge than we thought.
Echo from the Past: How Göbekli Tepe is Reshaping Our Understanding of the Neolithic
How Gobekli Tepe Rewrote the Origins of Civilization | TheCollector
Gobekli Tepe is an ancient site that changed how people view early human history and is believed to have been built between 9600 BCE and 8200 BCE.
www.thecollector.com
Yes its all covered in journals and archeology.
Geometry and Architectural Planning at Göbekli Tepe, Turkey
Geometry and Architectural Planning at Göbekli Tepe, Turkey | Cambridge Archaeological Journal | Cambridge Core
Geometry and Architectural Planning at Göbekli Tepe, Turkey - Volume 30 Issue 2
Representations of calendars and time at Göbekli Tepe and Karahan Tepe support an astronomical interpretation of their symbolism
I thought I was lol. I sure have linked a lot of amazing stone works. Many of these seem to have risen around the same time period. Like a peak in magnificant stone works. We see similar signatures of these stone works all over the world such as the pyramid. Is that not evidence.
Actually not just stone work as not all cultures had access to stone. Its really about megaliths and stone seemed to have been the main works. But there were also land glyphs and works such as in south America. Massive monuments, shapes in the ground that can only be seen from above. Other works that used the landscape itself such as large natural rocks being worshipped or used as monuments ect.
The logic is if there was a flood and we have strong evidence. That most humans lived by water such as rivers and coast lines. Then it is logical that quite significant numbers were lost. Cities flooded or washed away. We see evidence for this flooding especially in the northern hemisphere.
Such as the Channeled Scablands in Washington carved by the Missoula floods, the Black Sea deluge hypothesis supported by findings like ancient shorelines and drowned river valleys, and other evidence of large-scale floods in locations like North Africa, the Middle East, and Siberia.
Its ongoing research. But there was definitely a big melt of the ide cap at the end of the last iceage and big flooding.
Ice cores reveal rapid Antarctic ice loss in the past
Ice cores reveal rapid Antarctic ice loss in the past - British Antarctic Survey
The first direct evidence that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet shrank suddenly and dramatically at the end of the Last Ice Age, around eight thousand years ago, is published in …
www.bas.ac.uk
Most important we have the testimony of just about every culture on earth who tell us over and over again that there was a great disaster like a flood that actually wiped out their ancestors. This is also evidence of a different kind. Testimonial evidence from lived reality that was passed down. But science relegates this as myth because it cannot be tested in a lab.
Are you calling me a moron lol. Oh sorry Muron lol.
Well you will know of the research into electromagnetism and these sites around the world. Especially the pyramids. Something to do with some sites being aligned in locations of higher electromagnetism. Or that some sites can generate electromagnetism.
Study Reveals Electromagnetic Properties of the Great Pyramid of Giza
Study Reveals Electromagnetic Properties of the Great Pyramid of Giza - The International Space Federation (ISF)
There has been a number of recent scientific discoveries about the Great Pyramids of Giza using technologically advanced methods. For instance, a methodology
spacefed.com
The Possible Relation Between Ancient Monuments and Geophysical Anomalies
There seems to be some indication that ancient people had some awareness of magnetism; maybe they were led to built temples upon what we can recognize today as geophysical anomalies.
The Possible Relation Between Ancient Monuments and Geophysical Anomalies
The location and concomitant potential geophysical properties of monumental sites is rarely considered in archaeology. In a previous paper by the same authors, the types of various geophysical anomalies are analyzed: geoelectrical, hydrogeophysical, geological. These anomalies originate mainly...
www.sciencepublishinggroup.com
Hum I did not think there was suppose to be an orthodoxy to begin with. Thats not science. Whenever science gets dogmatic about orthodoxy like anything its going beyond science and into belief.
Nowhere to be found. Except the modern narratives that insist the Romans built them. But not the Romans themselves. You would think that considering they liked to detail all their works and achievements that moving the biggest blocks in the world would have been something to brag about. But more importantly describe in being able to achieve this as it would have required the greatest cranes ever built. Surely we would hear of such a feat.
I noticed even Ai which is a review of many findings acknowledges the Romans built the temple on an existing platform that was already there. Which though not evidence does show that at least a large number of articles say the same thing. The evidence seems strong its not made by Romans. Different style, old looking, eroded far more than the Roman work, not typical lifting holes, no crane capable of lifting such weights, no records of them moving them even though they mention the temple.
But this is an example of many sites and a bit like the vases where theres disagreement about origina and who made them. Which has not been resolved though there is growing evidence for earlier dates.
Why is it always those who propose an alternative idea. It is the orthodox narrative that has no evidence and relies on assumption. I never see anyone calling for their evidence. They just acept it as fact without any evidence.
So lets say theres no concrete evidence. Does the rational I just gave of the erosion, age, lack of physical ability of the Romans, completely different signatures that align more with other ancient megalths and that there was a site before hand, ect seem a stronger case. Than the no evidence from the orthodoxy based on whoever built last on a site built it.
Is expert itself the qualification. Who is more an expert lol. Is it a competition of experts. Which scientists is more an expert on a site. One who visits once or 150 times and has more detailed observations because they have been there many more times to be able to properly examine it.
And you have not shown it is natural. Funny that. How about we say it may or may not be. We cannot rule either out at this stage.
No Wiki8 cannot be trusted. Once again they just don't know and there is evidence its from an earlier time. Once again the signatures are different. But the point was regardless that there is evidence of very similar architecture from the same area.
The Yonagumi monument as the name suggests is Japanese. The Mount Nokogiri quarry is Japanese. The similar signatures in other works such as at Peru are from a similar time if not also earlier works.
This is the problem. The orthodoxy keeps relegating these works to people who themselves say their culture did not make them. We just don't know. But to assume they are from X culture when we don't know is wrong. Or that there is evidence they are earlier and just ignore this.
What like circular saws. How do they even get up there to use the tool. You would need a saw 20 foot big. Even then they are cut into the face and not across. How does a saw move.
Seems the good old orthodox methods can mimick everything from circular saws, lathes, giant graders, heavy lifters, almost magically.
Yes but the other forms like the Egyptian hyroglyphs were forms of written communication.
Alternative knowledge by its very nature is not testable by science. Its alternative because it cannot be tested by science. Like conscious experiences cannot be tested by science. They belong in a different paradigm.
Science can tests for the physical manifestations of brain activity. But the brain activity is not responsible for the experience. Thats like saying the wires in a computer are responsible for consious experience. Or alternative knowledge from God. How do you test for that. Say someones prayers are answered. Or God gives a revelation of knowledge. How do you test for that.
Because the deeper knowledge of nature may be experiencential which is a qualitative phenomena and not a quantified one. Science can only measure the quantified stuff. It will relegate the experiences or beliefs that bring the knowledge as something physical rather than immaterial. Belief is immaterial but brings knowledge.
In this case then its not lost. Its still happening. But it was a knowledge from the ancients. It was discovered by the ancients without science. It was part of their beliefs and experiences of being immersed in nature that they came up with it. They didn't have degrees in science where they worked out that this would be beneficial. ONly now we are beginning to understand this.
The point is they had medicines without the science. Its because they were immersed in nature. It was not just that they tried stuff. They understood nature as well and became aware of what worked and what did not.
That they understood the workings of nature. The cosmos was associated with crops, and seasons and movements of wildlife and other aspects of nature. They were living synchronised to nature. They worshipped the sun and moon and stars. They were their guides. This was part of what gave them secrets of nature.
Like how the pyramids and other works are aligned to the sun and moon and stars. This brought knowledge and actually influenced their world. Do you think they just aligned these works to stars for nothing.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
