U.S. Vice President JD Vance attends Mass at Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulchre
- By RileyG
- One Bread, One Body - Catholic
- 1 Replies
Thank you, VP Vance! May God bless you abundantly! 

Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

to be fair, Islamic countries aren't exactly known to be very compassionate and tolerant of those they disagree withView attachment 372050
Hang on tight folks!!! The Muslims are coming!
Be afraid!! Don't trust in God. Be afraid and find ways to suppress Muslims politically!!
I don't know. I guess it depends on one's own perception? Also, the intent of the person involved? I'm probably overthinking it.That's not the same as mocking. Mocking implies malicious intentions towards Jesus. Unless you are trying to conflate TPUSA and the cause of Christ?
Agreed.He was not imitating Jesus. Jesus overturned tables for a completely different reason and this was not Lopez’s first. He was just being intolerant and threw a tantrum. Again. There is a difference between imitating/following the Lord and using Jesus as an excuse for bad behavior.
Hey everyone this is my first time posting here so i apologize if im not formatting this correctly but i have a question for some Christians. Why is it that Judas Iscariot isn’t a saint? Now hear me out i get that he betrayed Jesus but he was still a loyal apostle no? And even after he betrayed Jesus he repents, granted he repents by taking his own life but he still understood his sin and he gave himself to Jesus. Is that not deserving of forgiveness. Jesus himself was not angry with Judas was he. Without Judas Jesus would not have been able save us from sin. Is his not a worthy sacrifice? Yes he gives up the son of God but he repents and him Giving up the son of God lead to the salvation of humanity. I guess it leads to the question of what is goodness without evil. But anyway why can we not appreciate or at least understand the fall and repentance of Judas?
People who love America must constantly endeavor to improve it. If Europe does certain things better than we do, why not adopt them?People who.love America aren't consistently trying to change it and make it more like Europe.
knocking down the East Wing.
According to who?This article in no way is evidence that the Egyptians used copper saws, sand and water. In fact it begins by telling us that absolutely no evidence has been found for any stone cutting saws.
In ancient Egyptian art no representations have been found of the sawing of stone by means of a copper blade and an abrasive (Lucas & Harris 1962, Stocks 1999), nor has any lapidary slabbing saw been found in the archaeological record (Arnold 1991).
It talks about the small hand saws (40cm) for carpentry which are depicted on the walls and we have found examples like above.
But when it comes to evidence for stone cutting there is no evidence of saws but and the article states that any suggestion of cutting with massive copper saws is inferred by the marks on the stones ie
The use of saws as a method of cutting rock is inferred from marks observed on ancient Egyptian stonework,
That's exactly what I am doing. So why is it ok for the article to infer without any evidence that these marks are made by giant copper saws that have never been found by what the marks on the stones look like.
But not ok for anyone to infer that whatever cut the stones was not a massive copper saw thats never been found. Because the same marks don't look like a big copper saw cut them.
The thing is, you don't know anything about any of that. You're just parroting from your favorites sources and can't even defend them. Have you ever used any abrasive cutting techniques?Both are inferred. Its just a case of which is closest to matching the marks. A big copper saw with abrasion. Or some other method that left marks that look like machining.
Not wanting to disagree with you, but...Fair enough, though i find it can be helpful to identify where doctrine originate and how they trace through the history of the church by the men who present them. Satan may be the originator of the lie, but sometimes it's easier to recognize that it is a lie when we know who first proposed it and what their background is. I certainly don't fault Augustine, and think he was a truly devout man. But even devout men fall victim to falsehoods from time to time.
Sure but it should also give you an idea that some things in scripture are allegorical and not literal. In real life 12 oxen could not carry over 85,000 pounds worth of water plus the weight of the materials.No but it gives us an idea how they measured.
Congratulations you quoted 1 Corinthians 2:14-16 now read the next 5 statements Paul said and learn why he said that.Yes, but you falsy believe that you conjured up your faith while you were dead in your sin. There in lies the problem, you have nothing that you didn't receive from God. That includes "your faith", but you didn't make your faith it was given to you by God, so that you would believe the gospel when you hear it.
No natural man can believe, until God gives him the faith to believe. Do you believe this, please?
Many are paid protesters (agitators). What they are really about is destroying our form of government. This is not an organic exercise of free speech and protest, it is an organized effort to bring down this Republic. Many are just duped puppets of the organizers. Just watch some of the many videos by investigative journalist on the ground. It is easy to discern what this is when one hears the organized propaganda from the leaders and the incoherent babble from the puppets.So, what are the no-Kings protests really about?
Ok so you think that 1 John 2:19 is saying that anyone who turns away was never a true believer? Because that’s not what is actually written in that passage and that interpretation directly contradicts James 5:19-20. So first of all John is talking about a specific group of people. “They went out from us” not “if anyone went out from us”. In that passage John is talking about a specific group of people who left the church. So let’s compare this to James 5:19-20.No, they never truly believed. Yes they made a public profession of faith and walked down the isle, but they were never inwardly converted.
1 John 2:19
They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
Okay, then what's all the hulabaloo about?Did you understand what I wrote about it being vague enough to be consistent with a lot of different plans?
Aside from complete destruction, that line is also consistent with the East Wing being heavily modified; it remaining and being incorporated into the new building; and the new building being appended onto it
If anyone at the time actually cared enough about this topic to listen to his press conference, I assume they'd have been interested enough to read the short press release. You can't replace part of something without touching that part. This is just after-the-fact manufactured hulabaloo courtesy of the usual Trump-hating industrial complex.The only way it's "obvious" is with hindsight and with giving him the benefit of the doubt. It was not at all obvious to anybody at the time, which is why everybody was surprised.
I almost posted about this response because I anticipated it. The obnoxious logical fallacy of "he must be lying because he always lies".lol, seriously? He lies constantly. It's one of his defining characteristics.