Gallup: Drop in U.S. Religiosity Among Largest in World
- News & Current Events (Articles Required)
- 299 Replies
This is not public information, as it is for charities.Churches file W-4s and I-9s, so pay is documented.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is not public information, as it is for charities.Churches file W-4s and I-9s, so pay is documented.
Alas, the text of the proposition is what it is.This raises an interesting question. If Texas is prohibited from using their new gerrymandered map, will California opt to stay with their original map also, since it was ostensibly only "in response to" what Texas did?
Enquiring minds...
The scripture references are on this chart I made...And?
I beg to disagree. You are just teaching what you have been taught.
Show us any Scripture that teaches a rapture of the Church, followed by a tribulation period of any length, followed by a third coming of the Lord?
Trump never abused any laws.
If it doesn’t affect gameplay and you’re not being forced to take part in anything you’re uncomfortable with, I think it really comes down to your own comfort level. Some players just ignore the decorations and keep playing, some turn off seasonal events if the game allows it, and some skip the game for a bit until the update passes. I’ve had moments in other games where something didn’t sit right with me, and I just asked myself: “Is this actually affecting me, or is it just background art I can walk past?” Most of the time it’s the latter. So I’d say do what works for you. If it bothers you, take a break or switch the game off until the event ends. If it doesn’t impact your experience, just keep building your town and enjoying the game. No one handles these things the same way, and that’s fine.I hope I'm posting in the right spot, if I'm not, my apologies and please move it to where it needs to be.
I want to talk about video games, table top games, etc and look at it from a place of Christian moral ethics. To give an example, I play the game Medieval Dynasty, which is mostly just building a city and managing it with all the resources. But due to it being close to Halloween, they've updated it to give the main towns halloween decorations. This isn't standard decorations... This looks purely pagan witchcraft to me.
View attachment 371968
So when you run across instances like this, what do you do? I'm not required to engage with it. Like, there isn't quests or anything but how do you handle video games and following Christian ethical standards? (This is just an example as I mean this discussion to be more broad than just the example I'm showing).
On a related note, similar questions arise with other types of games, like online casino or slot games, where themes or visuals can be intense. I like such games, and I play them from time to time, especially pokies. A few days ago, I came across this link https://pokiesman1.net/free-pokies/dragon-link/ where I managed to try a free online pokie called Dragon Link. I liked that there is a free version, which helped me to understand more about the game. To be honest, I don't know if something like this is acceptable, but I know the limits, and I play for fun
You would have to ask them - I absolutely cannot speak definitely for over 1 billion people and why they believe what they believe.What's your explanation of why we Catholics and Orthodox and Jews pray for our dead?
and you are more than free to do so - It very adequately demonstrates the teaching is extra biblical.So I stand by the statement -- Just because we do not have a preserved writing that directly speaks to a teaching prior to a certain point in time, that is not evidence that the belief was not in place prior to that.
No - it is pointing out that the pope approved of the document - nothing to get apoplectic over. Obviously, if the good pope found error, as you have, he would not have agreed with the writing.That's your WHOLE response? As if this is infallible teaching or something? Am I understanding you correctly here?
I'm more thinking metaphysical grounding, rather than developmental.I kinda disagree. Even when someone developes their own source for grounding, their environment, their friend group and their parents/family/etc are still the primary influencers in creating that grounding. So it is STILL coming from an external source. It's just different than a set of religious principles.
We don't develope in a vaccuum.
It only makes sense. Everything else can be at odds, but if we can agree to be peacemakers and show the love of God our allegiance will be clear.Nope. That's exactly me too.
YupYeah, I think that Khashoggi’s being a WaPo reporter was not an impediment to any business dealings with his murderer.
One would hope so.
Court blocks new Texas congressional map, in severe blow to GOP
A panel of federal judges in Texas on Tuesday blocked the state’s new GOP-favored House map from being used ahead of the 2026 midterms by declaring it a likely racial gerrymander, dealing a blow to Republicans who have looked to net extra seats.
In a 2-1 vote, the panel ordered Texas Republicans to use the congressional lines they had in place before they redistricted earlier this year. The new map would have offered Republicans up to five pickup opportunities in the House in 2026.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown wrote for the majority. Appointed to the bench by President Trump, Brown was joined by U.S. District Judge David Guaderrama, an appointee of former President Obama.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) quickly vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court, which is already considering wide-ranging questions about racial gerrymandering lawsuits in a long-running battle in Louisiana.
Churches file W-4s and I-9s, so pay is documented. Still not seeing what the benefit of requiring extra paperwork is supposed to be.We would then finally have some oversight over their finances. How much do they pay their officers? How much do they take in? How much do they spend on charitable programs? Just as we have Charity Navigator to help rate charities to avoid giving away to scams, we could have Church Navigator, to assess whether church donations were being spent wisely.
this has worried me, do I need to be a Catholic to be saved, or a Protestant? Or does the denomination have nothing to do with it?
What is the context that is supposed to change "who wants everyone to be saved and return to knowledge of the truth" into something other than desiring all to be saved?Mark Quayle said:
—"What more is needed"? Context is needed. It is not talking about him desiring that absolutely all sapient sentients responsible to God be saved, nor even all humans.
—"What more is needed"? Reasoning use of language is needed. It is not double-minded for God to feel outrage at disbelief and to call it desire for the opposite (I say, supposing, for the sake of argument, that the verse was stand-alone, which it is not).
That was an "as if", in case you didn't pick up on it. I'm not saying that reasoning use of language is needed, but that if one assumes what you do, they still should look into use of language, without proof-texting as though the verse was stand-alone, when plain language can mean more than just God doesn't get what he planned on and hoped for. The notion that God doesn't get what he planned on is akin to the notion that God will not complete what he began.
I notice you left the first statement completely alone. Again, read the verse in context. It is not saying that God wishes or hopes that all humanity will be saved.
You presume that God cannot make free will possible, you think too little of God in your assessment.Nor yours, lacking basis for its existence —I hope you can see that.
It's not confirmation bias, it's reality. Nor is it "circular' since its not 2 propositions dependent on one another, simply a fact that the determinist must exercise free will to make a denial of it.Continuing your confirmation bias —not to mention a circular argument. You are using your assumptions and definitions to prove your assumptions and definitions.
you don't seem to know what that word means.Yep, definitely confirmation bias. You take me saying "choice" as defined by "free will". Choice is not free will. Do dogs choose? Of course they do. So do robots. I'm not saying we are dogs nor robots, but compare our wills and our choices to God's. —It does not even compute. We don't operate on his level. Not even close.