Cat scan tomorrow…
- By Apple Sky
- Prayer Wall
- 2 Replies
Evening everyone. Got a cat scan tomorrow and getting ready to go to bed. I’d appreciate prayers for a good result. Thank you!![]()
Many prayers & blessings
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evening everyone. Got a cat scan tomorrow and getting ready to go to bed. I’d appreciate prayers for a good result. Thank you!![]()
Praise our great God for answered prayer! I'm so glad to read your post. Take it steady! Continuing to pray for you.@David Lamb @Strong in Him @prodromos & to who ever it may concern.
Just to let you know I am feeling a lot better now thanks to the Lord, thank you for all your kind concerns, I thought I were dying. You are really terrific people on here.
Many blessing
Apple
If I were american, I'd be more worried, knowing that when the illegal order to kill me will come down, it will also not be refused.According to this post you sound awfully pro-terrorist. Shame!
Yeah and national socialism isn't real socialism
As long as we have the Supreme Court we're not a democracy.
The worry about driving in the fog is that when the data is released it may show a road that is alot rougher than expected. I would note too that with such potential data to make markets volatile, the temptation for insider trading for those in the know could be higher than usual. Trump also has proposals to switch some data to be reported every 3 months. If the economy is a patient that at times might need treatment, timely and as accurate data as possible is helpful, not a hindrance.In his second term Donald Trump has torn up not just trade rules but the machinery of economic measurement. After lashing out at weak job figures, he sacked the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics in August, unsettling markets. A month-long government shutdown has since paused nearly all official data releases, leaving policymakers “driving in the fog”, as Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, put it.
IF you believe that is the case THEN Matt. 4:4, Luke 4:4 and Deut. 8:3 are all WRONGFirst off in Mark 4:15 Jesus specifically says: “Some people” and not “all people”.
Artists who died in poverty
Vincent van Gogh: Despite creating work that would later be worth millions, he sold only one painting during his lifetime and relied on his brother, Theo, for financial support.
Amedeo Modigliani: Lived in extreme poverty in Paris, sometimes trading paintings for meals and creating art on scavenged materials.
Paul Gauguin: Died poor and alone, his work not appreciated during his lifetime, though he experienced periods of financial struggle throughout his life.
Rembrandt van Rijn: A successful 17th-century painter who died in poverty after overspending on his art collection and being forced to sell his house and printing press.
Frans Hals: Another Dutch painter who fell into poverty in his later years as his style fell out of fashion, forcing him to sell his belongings.
Claude Monet: The famous Impressionist struggled financially for much of his life and could hardly make a living from his art.
Sandro Botticelli: Once celebrated, he died poor and forgotten after the death of his patron and a shift in artistic style in Florence.
Artists who experienced early poverty
Pablo Picasso: His early years in Paris were marked by extreme poverty, to the point where he reportedly burned some of his own work for warmth. He eventually moved out of poverty and his financial situation improved significantly over time.
| US Rank 2026 | WUR Rank 2026 | University | Overall | Teaching | Research Environment | Research Quality | Industry | International Outlook |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 97.7 | 99.2 | 95.3 | 99.6 | 100 | 91.9 |
| 2 | =3 | Princeton University | 97.2 | 98.2 | 97.3 | 99 | 98 | 85.4 |
| =3 | =5 | Harvard University | 97.1 | 95.9 | 100 | 98.9 | 86.7 | 88.3 |
| =3 | =5 | Stanford University | 97.1 | 97.5 | 97.4 | 99.5 | 100 | 83.9 |
| 5 | 7 | California Institute of Technology | 96.3 | 96.4 | 97.4 | 96.8 | 100 | 87.9 |
| 6 | 9 | University of California, Berkeley | 94.4 | 87.3 | 99 | 98.9 | 99.5 | 83.9 |
| 7 | 10 | Yale University | 94.1 | 94.6 | 94.5 | 97.2 | 87.6 | 81.4 |
Reminds me of the story about Haitians eating cats and dogs.Who is this? An Islamic group that follows a strict Salafi-jihadi ideology. They are seeking to establish an Islamic emirate in Somalia governed by its extreme interpretation of Sharia law. It is strongly anti-Western, anti-African Union, and opposes the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS), which it considers apostate.
This coming from a State governed by someone who could have been VP.
View attachment 373899
Time to do a tiny bit of research. I wonder what they are hiding in the north pole.![]()
“Those who are of faith, these are the sons of Abraham.”
“So then, those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.”
“That the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus.”
“The promises were made to Abraham and to his seed… and that seed is Christ.”
“If you are Christ’s, you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
Abraham is the father of all who believe, whether circumcised or uncircumcised.
“He is the father of us all.”
“If children, then heirs—heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ.”
“Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise.”
“He is not a Jew who is one outwardly…
but he is a Jew who is one inwardly,
and circumcision is of the heart, in the Spirit.”
“For we are the circumcision, who worship God in the Spirit…
and have no confidence in the flesh.”
“Peace be upon them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.”
“You are a holy priesthood.”
“You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation,
a people for His own possession.”
“Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God.”
“To all who received Him… children of God.”
“Not all who are of Israel are Israel…
The children of promise are counted as the seed.”
“One new man from the two.”
The promise to Abraham was that he would inherit the world,
and this promise comes through faith, not the law.
“The meek shall inherit the earth.”
“The Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.”
You'll also notice that there are 33 grid sections covering the plain.
I'm so glad you're feeling better.
That must have felt quite scary.
I never made that assumption. That is your assumption on my thinking. Your creating an either/or. I am not placing any stipulations on why abortions happen. Only that they increased dramatically after those laws were changed. Its the combinations of all factors that led to the increase.Part Ib opens with our discussion using abortion as an example...
I think you are confusing the correlation with causation. Legalization of birth control, abortion, and easier divorce all occurs in the US in a narrow window starting in the mid-1960s. I am well aware The Church (of Rome) consideres sex outside marriage to be a sin and abortion to be murder. I have heard many a homily on the subjects. That was not the point I was addressing. Rather I was addressing the false assumption that women having abortions are unmarried and not in relationships.
This is begging the question. You can be married today and not be a Christian. But if a couple are married under God as Christians then abortion is a sin. So you are conflating secular marriage with Christian marriage which is part of the problem and shows how secular norms and Christians norms are so different.This is not the case, then or now. Churches push this false impression all the time. Both birth control and abortions are used by married women because they don't want another child or one at the current time.
You literally just told me I was conflating correlations with causes.Since these things have occurred, unwanted pregnancy rates are down, abortion rates have fallen and so have divorce rates. (I suspect domestic violence is also down, but I don't have recollections of reading those statistics.)
Why, is it propaganda when its a biblical truth. Stating truth is not propaganda. This is a good example of how Christian beliefs are now seen as hateful and in this case propaganda or some false belief that is being pushed.That's not what I said. I mentioned that "baby killing" was the other primary bit of propaganda used by anti-abortion Christians.
Ok Christians who reject the bible. If you can call them Christians. Christians who not only reject the bible but promote unbiblical ideas. You can't sit on both sides of the fense.What are non-biblical Christians? If that's the kind that never read the bible, then we were definitely them.
Yes this is part of the very ideology that supports progressive ideas. They have to undermine the bible to do so. By questioning the truth that abortion is wrong they open the door for abortion.While churches certainly hold the position that "abortion is murder" that concept does not appear in any passage of the Bible. It is constructed by stacking conclusions upon on conclusions through theology. (That's they way theology is done it seems.) Other groups using the same sacred texts do not reach the same conclusions.
Then you don't know history. I explained this in the previous post. So perhaps you should be reading my posts more carefully.No. Again, you didn't read carefully. You used two terms straight from Mao's revolution: "The Long March"
Well the4y also have meaning in the west. You should not have assumed and I did explain this as the Long March through the Institutions. Its was a new strategy coined by Gramsci that instead of armed conflict in taking over the establishment. They could infiltrate the institutions and and take over that way.and the "Cultural Revolution". Both are well known epoch in Chinese communist history and neither was relevant to your discussion from why I could tell, so I was trying to figure out why you kept using CCP terminology.
But surely thats a subjective belief. So those who believe that it caused a lot of damage to people and society have an equal say. If a bible believing Christian tells their belief that sex outside marriage is a sin or SSM is a sin then this is not hate and wrong but just the right to express a belief by conscience. The same with those who believe sex outside marriage is good.Probably because I happen to thing the outcomes of the "sexual revolution" were good things.
Then what did the Colonies base their morals on. What morals did the Federation base it morals on. Was it the majority social norms. What was the majority social norms based on.The US was not a "Christian nation", then or ever, nor was it "Muslim" or "pagan". It was and is *secular*. (your country may be different, but I am not prepared or inclined to discuss your country.)
OK so does every house have an equal say. Which house holds the truth on what is moral so that we can make a determination over which house we should use as the basis for social policies and laws.In your house, perhaps, not in mine.
What was the false premise. That abortion was wrong or that society was wrong about thinking abortion was wrong.and built in part on false premises
So if we have less influence from Christianity then what influence do we use instead for social norms on sex and marriage.As I noted above, I agree with less influence of moralistic Christianity on sex and marriage.
Its not a conflation because what the 1950s were using as their basis was the bible which was the same basis for every other time in history. Including back to the early church right up until today. It has not changed. That we can only find certain times where society aligned with those biblical truths is irrelevant as to their truth.This is an ongoing conflation of the mores of the 1950s with all periods before then. It just wasn't the case.
What is a modernist strain of Christianity. You are not even a Christian. How can you know what Christianity is fullstop.Nah, it's just evidence for an strongly anti-modernist strain of Christianity.
I never said they were the same thing. I said laws are often based off social norms. How did SSM come about. It happened because society had changed and were more open to SSM.An extreme claim! LOL! It is a literal fact that "laws" and "social norms" are not the same things.
Have you not heard the famous quote "the personal is political which was part of 2nd wave feminism and set the stage for bringing the political into the private sphere.Not sure what that means.
I have studied extensively the early churh. Yes Christianity came from basically a Jewish sect and there were a number. But the important destinction is that it became the only sect or even religion as far as Islam that opened up to non natives or sect members.I suggest you learn more of the early history of your relgion then. In the early decades what we now call Christianity (sometimes called in these contexts the "Jesus movement" or "The Way") was a sect of Judaism. Importantly for my point in inclusion is that Judaism is from outside western culture.
Surely this is your personal opinion and a belief. If Christ is truely the saviour of all humankind then surely this is the greatest thing. Your begging the question that what you believe is the greatest good.I am not kidding and do you really need to ask? (I know you know.)
I think its an assumption that these things did not actually come from Christian values. Like democracy was used in the early church that the congregation was to affirm the leaders and the leaders were servants to the people. Or that all are equal in Christ as the basis for equality and human rights.It didn't and no one said it did. Certainly not me. What I said is that the things from ancient western culture that *I* find most valuable or important are most certainly not Christian -- democracy, mathematics, the early stages of science, as is the case for the best things of the Enlightenment.
Which is another way of saying they were intolerant of the Jews and Christians in the end.Finally the Romans were quite tolerant of other religions, but the did expect everyone to make the appropriate supplications to the civic and imperial cult. Jews (including Christians) being by then monotheists refused to do so and this cause some trouble.
Wrote about what moral basis for sex and family. Which set of morals were they referring to. Was it Venus. Or was this just some personal opinion of a philosopher.Roman philosophers wrote on sexual morality and family without any input from Christianity. This is reality, not some "bias view".
Actually it means exactly what it says. This verse includes 'neither Jew or Gentile'. It was that all were equal in Christ when it came to salvation. The free were no more better than the slave or the Jew to the Gentile. The Jews were regarded as special to Judaism and the frre were seen as higher status than the slaves. But all were the same in Christ."neither slave nor free" was about salvation through the death of Jesus -- anyone could be saved. It didn't change actual social status of anyone, slave, woman, or Jew.
Well the west also brought psychodelic drugs. Maybe thats why he thought the west was the best lol.You're going to ask Mr. Morrison for that. Perhaps it was ironic "best"ness given that in the same song he sings of wanting to kill his own mother.
Fair enoughWe're going to need a part Ic as I have other things to do...
Glory to God!@David Lamb @Strong in Him @prodromos & to who ever it may concern.
Just to let you know I am feeling a lot better now thanks to the Lord, thank you for all your kind concerns, I thought I were dying. You are really terrific people on here.
Many blessing
Apple
I'm so glad you're feeling better.@David Lamb @Strong in Him @prodromos & to who ever it may concern.
Just to let you know I am feeling a lot better now thanks to the Lord, thank you for all your kind concerns, I thought I were dying. You are really terrific people on here.
Many blessing
Apple
You failed to understand that Ezek 28 is not speaking about the devil. It's actually about Lucifer, who was not created as a devil, but became "the Devil" or Satan, after He rebelled against God and sinned.Ezek 28:
15 “You were blameless in your ways
From the day you were created
Until unrighteousness was found in you.
16 “By the abundance of your trade
You were internally filled with violence,
And you sinned;
Therefore I have cast you as profane
From the mountain of God.
And I have destroyed you, O covering cherub,
From the midst of the stones of fire.
17 “Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty;
You corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor.
I cast you to the ground;
I put you before kings,
That they may see you.
18 “By the multitude of your iniquities,
In the unrighteousness of your trade
You profaned your sanctuaries.
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 “All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”
========================
Malachi 4:
“For behold, the day is coming, burning like a furnace; and all the arrogant and every evildoer will be chaff; and the day that is coming will set them ablaze,” says the Lord of hosts, “so that it will leave them neither root nor branch.” 2 “But for you who fear My name, the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings; and you will go forth and skip about like calves from the stall. 3 You will tread down the wicked, for they will be ashes under the soles of your feet on the day which I am preparing,” says the Lord of hosts.
I find your logic illusive just then
"cease to be forever"
"wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternal life"
destroyed as in "by reducing them to ashes" 2 Peter 2
No doubt the second death of Rev 20 does involve a great deal of suffering and torment but it ends just as Ezek 28 states even for the devil himself
One would have thought no demand was required if people just went with what was preferred by the person.No, because the pronoun police demand that certain pronouns be used by others. No one here has made that demand. Are you?
Ecclesiastes 9:5-10 should be interpreted as Solomons "under the sun" perspective, meaning it describes life and death from a purely earthly, human point of view, without the full revelation of the afterlife found in the New Testament. The passage serves to highlight the vanity and futility of seeking meaning and fulfillment only in worldly accomplishments and pleasures.
- Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10 is cited to support the belief that the dead "know nothing" and have no activity or knowledge in the grave (Sheol).
- Psalm 146:4 states that when a person dies, their thoughts perish.
- Psalm 115:17 indicates that the dead do not praise the Lord.
- Job 14:10-12 describes death as a state of lying down until a future resurrection.
- Genesis 3:19, concerning returning to dust, is seen as the punishment for sin, rather than eternal torment.
- John 11:11-14, where Jesus describes Lazarus' death as a "sleep," is interpreted as a metaphor for the unconscious state of death before resurrection.