• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Criminal Illegal Alien Who Offered $10,000 Bounties to Murder ICE Agents Arrested in Dallas, TX

No. You think if the police come to your door to serve a warrant you can juat shoot them? Is that what it’s for?
No, the second amendment types believe this.

Of course we’ve well seen now they were always all talk.
  • Wow
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

U.S. Releases Video of Attack on Semi-Submersible and Sends Survivors Home

Well someone, who is usually fairly liberal on most issues suggested that Americans should just stop buying drugs
They literally said "they need help getting off (drugs)". That is very different from they just need to stop.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

Tell me how you can test this way for say phenomenal beliefs or experiences like love and beauty. Are these not also real. If someone has a persistent belief about something that they intuit is this not real. How do you explain belief in God. How do you test that God is not real
As is evidenced by your responses to me and your many responses to others, you have an uncanny knack of missing the point with a consistency that matches that of AV complaining about the demotion of Pluto to minor planet.

We can measure brain activity and bodily parameters of a person thinking about love, or admiring an object they consider beautiul. We can compare and contrast personal descriptions of their experiences. Yes, those experiences are real and so they can be investigated.

You seem to be confusing the reality of someone having a belief they hold to be true and the actual truth of that belief. Someone might say "I believe the Earth is flat." We do not dispute the reality of that belief. We do dispute the truth of it. You appear not to understand that distinction.

Do you think there is the remotest chance that you could address these two paragraphs, without going off on another string of largely irrelevant sideways excursions? It would be appreciated and would help me immensely in my efforts to follow forum guidlines of respecting fellow members.

And you might also provide peer-reviewed evidence, from a recognised journal, that justifies your outlandish claim in another post that our brains are much the same as our ancestors from 480,000 years ago! No word salad and obfuscation, just the link.
Upvote 0

Hell doesn't exist and there is no eternal suffering, instead bad peolle just cease to exist

This verse does not help your argument at all. Instead it points to once again it's either life or death. Destruction or life.
It was not my verse. The poster that I answered quoted it.
And when we translate the word "destroy" back to the Hebrew or Greek we should always take the very first meaning unless the context tells us something different.
Meaning is based on context NOT on whatever meaning you think helps your case better.
For example it's a huge leap to use the word wineskin as an example verses Christ's own teaching that God can destroy both (fully in the Greek) body and soul in hell. Christ makes it so simple. He doesn't leave any wiggle room- both body and soul in hell. There's a reason it's called the "second death". Perish we know is the same Greek word apollumi. First meaning destroy -fully. When we know that and see all of the verses that use this verse next to the word "life" we can get the full meaning of what is being discussed. You either have life or you don't.
No. In light of the verses that I posted after answering the other posters verses your definition of destroy does not work. You guys keep saying to use all of scripture but it does not seem to apply to both of you.
Again, I'm sure these verses sum up what will happen to the wicked -


Malachi 4:1 "For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave then neither root nor branch.

This would state that yes, the wicked will be not found and no more. God is making it very clear that there will be nothing left.

Destroy in the Hebrew shamad
1. to desolate

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
destruction, bring to nothing, overthrow, perish, pluck down, utterly
A primitive root; to desolate -- destroy(- uction), bring to nought, overthrow, perish, pluck down, X utterly.

Malachi 4:3 "And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I shall do this, saith the Lord of hosts."


Psalms 145:20 "The Lord preserveth all them that love Him: But all the wicked will He destroy."

The Lord only preserves those that loves him. But he will destroy all the wicked and bring them to nothing. When we see the verses in Malachi when can then add that context to the meanings of the words perish and destroy. That's how it works. Not just picking out whatever meaning you want (like the wineskin example) because it fits your doctrine. Context matters. When we see that words translated back have multiple meanings you have to apply context so you can arrive at the correct meaning.



Psalms 37:19 "They shall not be ashamed in the evil time: And in the days of famine they shall be satisfied."

The famine for the end times is for hearing the Word of God.

Psalms 37:20 "But the wicked shall perish, And the enemies of the Lord shall be as the fat of lambs: They shall consume; into smoke shall they consume away.

Once again, God can't be any more clear. The wicked will consume away, into smoke, shall they consume away. You can try and work around these verses but again, you put them all together and with Christ's teaching it tells us without a doubt what will happen to the wicked.


Psalms 37:38 "But the transgressors shall be destroyed together: The end of the wicked shall be cut off.

They will simply cease altogether.
In your opinion and interpretation. Tell me do the wicked cease to exist in the following verse?

““Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, you accursed people, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels;”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭25‬:‭41‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

After all scripture should agree with scripture, don’t you think?
Upvote 0

Trump's reputation will age like fine wine

We have high-level political scientists in Australia discussing how bad it is for a nation to see their leader go and prostrate themselves before Trump in the golden throne room, kissing the ring lest they make daddy angry.

Then as a result of "No Kings" day Trump puts up a video of himself as Tom Cruise (with a Crown) in a Maverick jet dropping poo all over the protestors? JD Vance puts up a video of Trump drawing a royal sword on a throne, and his staff bending the knee and touching the floor before him reverentially?

This administration is a cartoon of itself - a walking blustering narcissistic joke.

Because THIS is how a real President posts!

1. KING MAVERICK DROPS POO on CITIZENS​

Because he's the mostest Presidential Personage Ever! In a bigly way!

View attachment 371847

2. POPE TRUMP​

Because ranting about how he'd make a great Pope when Trump is the first convicted Felon President - with ambiguity over what's exactly in the Epstein files - is a dignified and statesman like way to behave!

View attachment 371848

3. RACIST TRUMP​

Because - racism sells to a certain base!
View attachment 371849

4. INSURRECTIONIST TRUMP!​

"If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country!"
View attachment 371850


5. CORRUPT TRUMP​

Australian ABC 4 Corners. Watch all 45 minutes. That's just the TIP of the iceberg of how Australian's view this narcissistic entitled grifter! Try watching the 4 Corners specials on Trump's insurrection and electioneering tactics!

Login to view embedded media
Let alone threatening NATO, Zelenskyy, and even democracy itself.
Q: Should the American President defend the Constitution?
Trump: I dunno


THAT is how the world sees Trump!
THAT is how history will see these terrible embarrassing years.
Sounds like you are trying to reconcile the notorious flop that was the "No Kings Rally 2.0." Basically it was seen no differently than a large scale group of liberals shooting water guns at a picture of Trump to vent their frustrations without actually accomplishing anything.
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Another look at the moon landing.

Actually Freemasonry has been around since Nimrods day & Nimrod was the very first Mason, but Freemasonry has undergone many names throughout the ages, like 'Brothers of the snake' etc.
Where is our biblical evidence for Nimrod being a Freemason? Here arde the four verses that mention Nimrod:

Ge 10:8 Cush begot Nimrod; he began to be a mighty one on the earth.
Ge 10:9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; therefore it is said, Like Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.
1Ch 1:10 Cush begot Nimrod; he began to be a mighty one on the earth.
Mic 5:6 They shall waste with the sword the land of Assyria, And the land of Nimrod at its entrances; Thus He shall deliver [us] from the Assyrian, When he comes into our land And when he treads within our borders.

No mention of Freemasonry.
Upvote 0

Why do people hate ICE...

Yes because rhe only way to make it happen is by the force of government. Forcing your neighbor to give, which is antithetical to scriptural teaching.
I was thinking that by its very nature fallen humans are more inclined to want to live according to the world and their natural desires. It goes against human flesh nature to live as Gods Kingdom on earth as it is spiritual and requires submitting to God and living according to the spirit and not the flesh.
Yes and thise nations aren't willing to do what it takes to get there.
Its a conflict of interests. You cannot serve both money and materialism and self or God at the same time. Something becomes your god. Its either the worlds principalities and ideologies. Or its Gods.

There is really nothing to do but submit. Thats the hardest part.

I think thats the fundemental division and conflict. That people have different beliefs and ideas about the world and beyond. About who should be God and King of us all. There is no unity of mind and spirit.

If we were all united under Christ as King then we would be unified and know that there is no King but Christ. We would have a true God worthy as our King to unite under. Any earthy leader would be a servant of that King.
Upvote 0

Hell doesn't exist and there is no eternal suffering, instead bad peolle just cease to exist

Scripture only.

For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth. --Psalm 37:95
King James Bible

Yet a little while, and the wicked will be no more; though you look for them, they will not be found. --Psalm 37:10 Berean Standard Bible

New King James Version
But the wicked shall perish; And the enemies of the LORD, Like the splendor of the meadows, shall vanish. Into smoke they shall vanish away. --Psalm 37:20

For the wicked will be destroyed, but those who trust in the LORD will possess the land.--Psalm 37:9 New Living Translation

Those who do evil will perish. But those who wait on the LORD will inherit the land. --Psalm 37:9 International Standard Version

John 3:36
The one believing in the Son has eternal life, but the one not obeying the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him." Berean literal Bible

Daniel 12:2
And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, Some to everlasting life, Some to shame and everlasting contempt. New King James Version

Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14 But small is the gate and narrow the way that leads to life, and only a few find it. --Matthew 7:13-14
Berean Standard Bible

Jude 1:7
In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire. NIV

Mark 9:43
And if your hand should cause you to stumble, cut it off; it is better for you to enter into life crippled, than having two hands to go away into Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire. Berean Literal Bible
You didn’t quote any of my post and ignored everything that I posted. I spent time answering your post line by line. Your post here has the same identical verses that I already debunked in my previous post. If you want to have a conversation then have the courtesy to address my post as I addressed yours.
Upvote 0

Trump sends troops to the 'warzone' of Portland...

Or have the "right" judges on the bench.
The 9th circuit has always been a liberal court.

So if they rule against Trump then they are the right judges for the left. And if they rule in favor of Trump they are the right judges for the right.

I think thats what it comes down to now for both sides.
Upvote 0

Why do people hate ICE...

I literally told you that I knew you lived on an island and that's why you are clueless regarding "borders".
I diagreeing with your assumption that I am clueless because I live on a large island and have no fenses or guards.
Once the Tasmanians were dealt with.
More politicing.
This is the problem, Steve. You want to play around in American politics and you don't understand basic cultural references that would be known to *anyone* your age in my country. Let me summarize it for you -- the goals of the DEI you decry were the subjects of actual advertising campaigns from soft drink companies (Coke-a-Cola, Dr. Pepper) in the 1970s and 80s. Somehow it has become "bad". (I wonder why...)
I still cannot see what this has got to do with immigration and border security. You seem to be dredging up unrelated stuff about stereotypical cultural icons from decades ago. What has DEI got to do with it. Are you bringing in DEI as why the government is cracking down on border security.
As I stated, I know it is an island. You wrote of anti-ICE violence and I pointed out that the streets were filled with non-violent protesters. In contrast group violence against immigrants (not immigration officers) has been a fixture of American culture for 2 centuries. I'm not sure how this is hard to comprehend. Perhaps it is that your assumptions on this thread are completely disconnected from reality.
Are you saying that because there is a history of violence against immigrants that this somehow negatives policies to toughen up immigration and border security.

I was saying that people can protest but not commit violence or call for violence or do violence against others as part of the protests. That it seems as a result the tension has gone up 10 notches and we are seeing an increase in violent speak and acts including terror acts. This is an observation and a reality. To say nothing about whose fault but that its a fact it is happening.
Places where unauthorized and deportable immigrants are located are not war zones, nor are they terrorists.
I don't think this is what they are trying to combat. Its more the criminal and terror groups or people that are fighting the policy or cracking down. Did not an ICE facility get shot up and other shooters. Was not ANTIFA involved. Maybe a bomb threat. There have been riots and in some places its increased 1,000%.

I have seen people in streets throwing things at ICE agents. They are doxing them in the hope they and their family are identified and attacks and possibly killed.

Immigration Brief: Domestic Extremists Target ICE Officers

The Rising Threat of Anti-Government Domestic Terrorism: What the Data Tells Us
The number of domestic terrorist attacks and plots against government targets motivated by partisan political beliefs in the past five years is nearly triple the number of such incidents in the previous 25 years combined, according to new CSIS analysis of 30 years of domestic terrorism data in the United States.

The answer is for ICE to stop being so violent.
I agree if they are being violent. But what is violence. For some simply stopping undocumented immigrants is violence. If as a result that the mre radical arm of those who believe imigrants should not be stopped become violent what then. Should the government increase their protection and ability to combat these radicals. Or increase law and order as a result of it getting out of hand.
It is ICE that is committing the violence.
Hum this is what I am seeing. Were there not terror attacks on ICE facilities. Are not people in the streets attacking ICE agents just moving through the streets. Is not ANTIFA an organised terror group commiting terror against ICE. The articles above say otherwise. They speak of a rising terror full stop that is unjustified. If there is a rising terror should not the government be prepared.

This reminds me of the riots and violence in past revolutions. They have a right to protest but not use violence. The fact is overall violence is rising and theres been more terror attacks and shootings than in the last 30 years or more.

But not just for ICE. A general rising of violence and culture wars. Three attempts on Trump and Kirk is just a couple of examples. But other assassinations of people and shootings and violence is rising. The climate is heating up.
It is ICE that is committing the violence. "Antifa" hasn't attacked anyone.
Hum is Antifa a group that uses violence and terror. If they did not do it then was this attack an act of terror against a government department. Is there any organised groups who are willing to commit violence and terror against the US government.

Federal prosecutors have secured a grand jury indictment of two alleged followers of the antifa movement on terrorism-related charges stemming from their involvement in a July 4 attack on an ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas

Anarchists and Rioters in Portland Illegally Dox ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement
Multiple organizations appear to be responsible for doxing these federal officers, including an anarchist and Antifa-affiliated group based in Portland called “Rose City Counter-Info” and another called “The Crustian Daily.” Both of these groups have published the names, pictures, and personal address of ICE officers on their websites.

If you add the above articles it seems Anifia is a rising problem that is willing to use violence and promote it. But also splinter groups are growing. A similar thing happened with BLM. These groups though well intended can promote radicalism. Many are linked to other terror groups.

There is definitely a rising problem of radicalisation in US politics. But its also worldwide and the same basic divide of radical left and right.

The Rise of Political Violence in the United States
We're talking about America, Steve. All nuts are gun nuts.
Is that a way of justifying whats happening.
Paxton is a thug.
I don't know him but it seems the independent evidence supports his claim that political violence is rising and more are willing to use violence as a means.

Student acceptance of violence in response to speech hits a record high
According to FIRE’s annual College Free Speech Rankings survey, in 2020, the national average showed about 1 in 5 students said it was ever acceptable to use violence to stop a speaker. That number has since risen to a disturbing 1 in 3 students.

There’s a growing number of Americans who think violence might be necessary to get the country back on track
You don't actually read what I write, do you? Just typing random thoughts after what I wrote, eh?
I did and I am way ahead and your not keeping up. I said there were similarities between radicalism of Islamist and the radicalism that is behind the growing violence and terror attacks in the US. I explained this a bit above.

You cannot see this as your probably don't understand sociology and psychology of the thinking behind such radicalism. This is my area. Yours maybe physics but mine is human sciences.
What is "coming" Steve?
More of the same. More persecution of Jews and increasing persecution of Christians.
Who trusts the UN?
Really is that the trench you want to die in. You really don't think there is any truth to the UN assessments. I know they can be highly biased. But I just gave you ample independent evidence of this. Do you not notice the rise in unrest and civil conflicts, protests, riots in many nations. The increasing use of violence.
  • Winner
Reactions: rjs330
Upvote 0

Another look at the moon landing.

Do explain some more

AI overview
The "Brotherhood of the Snake" is a name used for several different concepts, but in some theories, it refers to a supposed ancient secret society with origins in Sumerian mythology, linked to the Anunnaki gods and ancient serpent cults. This supposed group is believed to be a shadowy organization that has influenced human history, potentially associated with other secret societies like the Illuminati and Freemasons.
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

Hey, there's no need to point out that you don't need to have to put forward an argument. That is all too apparent. There is no evidence for it whatsoever. Your MO is just that, to simply criticise the opposing view.
Where criticism is due, I criticize. If your position can only respond to criticism by repetition and insisting that it is the default, then it must be weak.
So how do I reply to a post that offers nothing to to argue against? Well, I'll just point out that problem and hope that at some point you'll offer something positive. Otherwise... I have better things to do.
You could reply by responding to the criticisms with something that actually addresses them rather than just trying to re-explain something that has been countered as if just stating it again is gong to change anything.
Upvote 0

The Reality of Free Will

Not suggesting. Just asking... Are you saying that free will means making only right choices?
No. We actually make plenty of bad choices. If we didn’t then we would never have to confess our sins. I always confess my known sins and ask forgiveness for any sins that I might have committed unknowingly. One reason here why I do not have the free will to not sin.
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

Criticising your position doesn't require me forwarding an argument of my own.
Hey, there's no need to point out that you don't need to have to put forward an argument. That is all too apparent. There is no evidence for it whatsoever. Your MO is just that, to simply criticise the opposing view.

So how do I reply to a post that offers nothing to to argue against? Well, I'll just point out that problem and hope that at some point you'll offer something positive. Otherwise... I have better things to do.
Upvote 0

Speaker Johnson describes planned No Kings rally as ‘hate America,’ ‘pro-Hamas’ gathering

Johnson obviously hates the 7 million American patriots who defended democracy.
He's the hater.
Lol. They werent all Americans. And they were not doing anything but being silly. If they really were defending democracy then they would be marching in support of Trump removing illegals because thats part of our democracy as the laws were democratically passed.
Upvote 0

Heating up down under

While climate change is real, I think the so called problem is being overexaggerated in order to induce panic. And I really shouldn't have to explain why I'm adverse to fearmongering. Nor do I see why the republican party should go along with it.
I'm going to make 2 statements for you to agree or disagree with. First, climate change is a problem. Second, the sooner we address the problem, the less severe the repercussions. Now, I'm not speculating about how severe the repercussions will be, so no scare mongering. Do you agree with those two propositions? If so, why delay action and kick the can down the road? Shouldn't we act to prevent greater harm, even if its not as drastic as sensationalists make it out to be?
  • Like
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,761
Messages
65,423,536
Members
276,400
Latest member
AlbertW