• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

WHAT DOES PAUL. SAID OF Eph 1 : 4. !!

The actual term "born again" which is what Nicodemus was supposed to have understood comes from Ezekiel.

Eze 36:25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.
Eze 36:26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
Eze 36:27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.

This was for the faithful remnant of Israel that would enter the earthly kingdom. While Christians could be called "regenerated" when receiving new and eternal life when placed into the body of Christ, it can be confusing to also call this being "born again".
Upvote 0

Eve and the Fallacy of Moral Choices

First off in Mark 4:15 Jesus specifically says: “Some people” and not “all people”.
IF you believe that is the case THEN Matt. 4:4, Luke 4:4 and Deut. 8:3 are all WRONG

or, your reasoning is off

IF all have sin, (we do) and sin is of the devil, (it is) then Mark 4:15 applies to everyone

IF we are tempted in mind/heart, (we are) then Mark 4:15 is true again

I could go on, but if you exempt yourself from Mark 4:15 then you are basically rejecting the Word of God

And of course we know who does that don't we?

The balance of your reply is self justification, which I can't do in light of the above

Oh, and btw I do believe in eternal hell, for the devil and his messengers so that question is off the table
Upvote 0

A long-lost Rubens painting depicting Crucifixion sells for $2.7 million

I'm always bemused by how much some works of art cost when their creators often lived in poverty.

Rubens was wealthy for most of his life but there were plenty who struggled financially.

From an AI response -
Artists who died in poverty

Vincent van Gogh: Despite creating work that would later be worth millions, he sold only one painting during his lifetime and relied on his brother, Theo, for financial support.

Amedeo Modigliani: Lived in extreme poverty in Paris, sometimes trading paintings for meals and creating art on scavenged materials.

Paul Gauguin: Died poor and alone, his work not appreciated during his lifetime, though he experienced periods of financial struggle throughout his life.

Rembrandt van Rijn: A successful 17th-century painter who died in poverty after overspending on his art collection and being forced to sell his house and printing press.

Frans Hals: Another Dutch painter who fell into poverty in his later years as his style fell out of fashion, forcing him to sell his belongings.

Claude Monet: The famous Impressionist struggled financially for much of his life and could hardly make a living from his art.

Sandro Botticelli: Once celebrated, he died poor and forgotten after the death of his patron and a shift in artistic style in Florence.

Artists who experienced early poverty

Pablo Picasso: His early years in Paris were marked by extreme poverty, to the point where he reportedly burned some of his own work for warmth. He eventually moved out of poverty and his financial situation improved significantly over time.
Upvote 0

‘Go to Berkeley’: Ron DeSantis said students seeking ‘woke’ classes should study elsewhere

1764755938393.png



“If you want to do things like gender ideology, go to (the University of California) Berkeley,” DeSantis added. “There’s nothing wrong with that, per se, but for us with our tax dollars, we want to focus on the classical mission of what a university is supposed to be.”

“What this does is reorient our universities back to their traditional mission and part of that traditional mission is to treat people as individuals, not to try to divvy them up based on any type of superficial characteristics,” DeSantis said.


US Rank 2026WUR Rank 2026UniversityOverallTeachingResearch EnvironmentResearch QualityIndustryInternational Outlook
12Massachusetts Institute of Technology97.799.295.399.610091.9
2=3Princeton University97.298.297.3999885.4
=3=5Harvard University97.195.910098.986.788.3
=3=5Stanford University97.197.597.499.510083.9
57California Institute of Technology96.396.497.496.810087.9
69University of California, Berkeley94.487.39998.999.583.9
710Yale University94.194.694.597.287.681.4


1) According to the TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS, the University of California (Berkeley) ranks 6th among US universities and 9th in the world!

2) Two other California universities actually rank ahead of Berkeley, the California Institute of Technology and Stan ford (tied with Harvard) rank 5th and 3rd for US universities - 7th and 6th worldwide!

3) A total of 9 universities in California were slotted ahead of the University of Florida (44th) - the highest ranked university in that state!

3rd - Stanford University (5th worldwide)
5th - California Institute of Technology (7th worldwide)
6th - University of California Berkeley (9th worldwide)
11th - University of California Los Angeles ranks (18th worldwide)
22nd - University of California San Diego ranks 22nd (47th worldwide)
25th - University of California Davis 25th (64th worldwide)28th - University of California Santa Barbara (72nd worldwide)
29th - University of Southern California (73rd worldwide)
35th - University of California Irvine (97th worldwide)

44th - University of Florida (134th worldwide)

4) Apparently Governor DeSantis has decided to start his 2028 Presidental Campaign early but he's finally learned the hard way not to renew his fight with Disney!

5) Now he's decided to take a page out of President Trump's playbook he's picking a fight with the universities - threatening to establish his own accreditation board as a means of forcing Florida's institutions to comply!

6) Florida's Governor has assumed the role of determining what can/can't be taught in that state's institutions for the express purpose "to focus on the classical mission of what a university is supposed you be!"

7) Someone should inform the Governor that try as he might, he can't recapture his idyllic version of "THE GOOD OLD DAYS" and that the 1950's are not about to make a comeback anytime soon!

8) DeSantis' comments directed at Berkeley, that supposed "bastion of woke," are all the more misguided, given that the Governor has unintentionally issued an open invitation to compare Florida's public universities with those of California - where the Governor has made np attempt to impose his will on what is being taught!

9) As previously stated, the "Times Higher Education World University Rankings"
places the University of California Berkeley as the 6th best university in America and 9th in the World - in fact, California has currently placed 3 universities in the Top 10 in the world (2 public, 1 private)!

10) California also has 9 universities (7 public, 2 private) that rank in the Top 35 nationally and all are included within the Top 100 internationally!

11) Compare "woke" California where all 9 universities are ranked ahead of the highest placed university in Florida, where no institution of higher learning, public or private, managed to be included among the Top 100 worldwide!

44th - University of Florida (134th worldwide)
56th - University of Miami (private)(201-250 worldwide)
66th - Florida State University (301-350 worldwide)
74th - University of South Florida (351-400 worldwide)
80th - Florida International University (401-500 worldwide)

12) Many of Florida's universities, both private and public, are better known for their football program than academics!

13) In 2023, Governor DeSantis set aside $1 million in pubic funds to finance a Florida State University's (FSU) legal challenge directed at the College Football Playoff Committee when FSU wasn't included as one of the playoff teams that year!






TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS, the University of California (Ber

“If you want to do things like gender ideology, go to (the University of California) Berkeley,” DeSantis added. “There’s nothing wrong with that, per se, but for us with our tax dollars, we want to focus on the classical mission of what a university is supposed to be.”

“What this does is reorient our universities back to their traditional mission and part of that traditional mission is to treat people as individuals, not to try to divvy them up based on any type of superficial characteristics,” DeSantis said.
Upvote 0

Minnesota is drowning in fraud.

Who is this? An Islamic group that follows a strict Salafi-jihadi ideology. They are seeking to establish an Islamic emirate in Somalia governed by its extreme interpretation of Sharia law. It is strongly anti-Western, anti-African Union, and opposes the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS), which it considers apostate.

This coming from a State governed by someone who could have been VP.
Reminds me of the story about Haitians eating cats and dogs.
Upvote 0

The Final Experiment (Flat Earth Bites The Dust)

View attachment 373899

Time to do a tiny bit of research. I wonder what they are hiding in the north pole. :D

Well according to Admiral R. Byrd they are hiding loads, could it be paradise or this black magnetic rock ( Rupes Nigra ) ? After all, all compasses point to the north.

Compass = Come pass
Upvote 0

Christians are Abrahams seed

From chat GPT

1. CHRISTIANS ARE ABRAHAM’S SEED


Galatians 3:7


“Those who are of faith, these are the sons of Abraham.”

Galatians 3:9


“So then, those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.”

Galatians 3:14


“That the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus.”

Galatians 3:16


“The promises were made to Abraham and to his seed… and that seed is Christ.”

Galatians 3:26–29


“If you are Christ’s, you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

Romans 4:11–12


Abraham is the father of all who believe, whether circumcised or uncircumcised.

Romans 4:16


“He is the father of us all.”



2. CHRISTIANS ARE HEIRS TO ABRAHAM’S PROMISE


Romans 8:16–17


“If children, then heirs—heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ.”

Galatians 4:28


“Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise.”

Galatians 4:30


Believers are the inheritors, like Isaac, not Ishmael.


Hebrews 6:17


God confirmed the promise to Abraham for the heirs (Christians).




3. CHRISTIANS ARE JEWS INWARDLY, THE TRUE CIRCUMCISION


Romans 2:28–29


“He is not a Jew who is one outwardly…
but he is a Jew who is one inwardly,
and circumcision is of the heart, in the Spirit.”

Philippians 3:3


“For we are the circumcision, who worship God in the Spirit…
and have no confidence in the flesh.”

Colossians 2:11


Christians receive the circumcision of Christ, not made with hands.




4. CHRISTIANS ARE “THE ISRAEL OF GOD”


Galatians 6:16


“Peace be upon them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.”

Most scholars agree Paul uses this to describe the church, not ethnic Israel.




5. CHRISTIANS ARE THE TEMPLE, PRIESTHOOD, AND HOLY NATION


All titles given originally to Israel in the Old Testament.


1 Peter 2:5


“You are a holy priesthood.”

1 Peter 2:9


“You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation,
a people for His own possession.”

(These titles come from Exodus 19:5–6 describing Israel.)


1 Peter 2:10


“Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God.”

1 Corinthians 3:16–17


Christians are God’s Temple.


Ephesians 2:19–22


Believers are fellow citizens, part of the household of God, being built into a holy Temple.





John 15:1 Jesus is the true vine

I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman"





7. CHRISTIANS ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD / CHILDREN OF PROMISE


John 1:12–13


“To all who received Him… children of God.”

Romans 9:6–8


“Not all who are of Israel are Israel…
The children of promise are counted as the seed.”

Paul explains that true Israel is defined by faith, not ethnicity.


Galatians 4:4–7


Believers become sons and heirs.




8. CHRISTIANS ARE “ONE NEW MAN,” NOT TWO PEOPLES


Ephesians 2:11–18


Christ abolished the dividing wall and created:


One new man from the two.”

Not two covenants.
Not two Israels.
One reconciled people in Christ.




9. CHRISTIANS INHERIT THE WORLD / THE KINGDOM


Romans 4:13


The promise to Abraham was that he would inherit the world,
and this promise comes through faith, not the law.

Matthew 5:5


“The meek shall inherit the earth.”

1 Corinthians 6:2


Christians will judge the world.




10. CHRISTIANS ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE JERUSALEM ABOVE


Galatians 4:26


“The Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.”

This contrasts with earthly Jerusalem enslaved under the law.
Also Jesus was Abrahams seed so God gave Canaan to Jesus around 2100 BC the Israelites were only temporary residents on the land. Jesus did not want the land so he replaced it with the new Jerusalem for his followers Christians. Canaan /Palestine is no longer the promise land.

The Mamdani Model: More Socialist Mayors to ComeBeware! The DSA will attempt to repeat Mamdani’s success in other Democrat strongholds.

Part Ib opens with our discussion using abortion as an example...

I think you are confusing the correlation with causation. Legalization of birth control, abortion, and easier divorce all occurs in the US in a narrow window starting in the mid-1960s. I am well aware The Church (of Rome) consideres sex outside marriage to be a sin and abortion to be murder. I have heard many a homily on the subjects. That was not the point I was addressing. Rather I was addressing the false assumption that women having abortions are unmarried and not in relationships.
I never made that assumption. That is your assumption on my thinking. Your creating an either/or. I am not placing any stipulations on why abortions happen. Only that they increased dramatically after those laws were changed. Its the combinations of all factors that led to the increase.

Its more about the fundemental ideology or belief basis for those laws which was that abortion and divorce were ok now. Or at least compromised from the biblical standard. That is what opened the gates.

Even a Christian within a marriage sees abortion murder and certainly unmarriage relationships and bearing kids is anti bible. So two wrongs don't make a right. But part of the problem is the devaluing of marriage so that sex is now acceptable outside marriage. Which then opens the door for unwanted preganacies.
This is not the case, then or now. Churches push this false impression all the time. Both birth control and abortions are used by married women because they don't want another child or one at the current time.
This is begging the question. You can be married today and not be a Christian. But if a couple are married under God as Christians then abortion is a sin. So you are conflating secular marriage with Christian marriage which is part of the problem and shows how secular norms and Christians norms are so different.
Since these things have occurred, unwanted pregnancy rates are down, abortion rates have fallen and so have divorce rates. (I suspect domestic violence is also down, but I don't have recollections of reading those statistics.)
You literally just told me I was conflating correlations with causes.
That's not what I said. I mentioned that "baby killing" was the other primary bit of propaganda used by anti-abortion Christians.
Why, is it propaganda when its a biblical truth. Stating truth is not propaganda. This is a good example of how Christian beliefs are now seen as hateful and in this case propaganda or some false belief that is being pushed.

Simply stating as Christians have always said that abortion and marriage outside biblical marriage is a sin is not hate or propaganda. Its simply expressing a belief and people have a right to express that belief.
What are non-biblical Christians? If that's the kind that never read the bible, then we were definitely them.
Ok Christians who reject the bible. If you can call them Christians. Christians who not only reject the bible but promote unbiblical ideas. You can't sit on both sides of the fense.
While churches certainly hold the position that "abortion is murder" that concept does not appear in any passage of the Bible. It is constructed by stacking conclusions upon on conclusions through theology. (That's they way theology is done it seems.) Other groups using the same sacred texts do not reach the same conclusions.
Yes this is part of the very ideology that supports progressive ideas. They have to undermine the bible to do so. By questioning the truth that abortion is wrong they open the door for abortion.

Are you saying there is no biblical determination that even erring on the side of caution as to Gods creation and the divine act of procreation in recreation Gods creation can be just terminated based on some relative justification. At the very least we should stop 99% of abortions.
No. Again, you didn't read carefully. You used two terms straight from Mao's revolution: "The Long March"
Then you don't know history. I explained this in the previous post. So perhaps you should be reading my posts more carefully.

Antonio Gramsci’s long march through history

and the "Cultural Revolution". Both are well known epoch in Chinese communist history and neither was relevant to your discussion from why I could tell, so I was trying to figure out why you kept using CCP terminology.
Well the4y also have meaning in the west. You should not have assumed and I did explain this as the Long March through the Institutions. Its was a new strategy coined by Gramsci that instead of armed conflict in taking over the establishment. They could infiltrate the institutions and and take over that way.

Which is Marxism and instead of being about Class thanks to the same academic ideologues Critical theories it became Cultural Marxism and about every percieved oppressed identity and not just class.

Hense gender, race, sex, religion and a growing number of newly created identities. Hense a Cultural revolution rather than an armed revolution. Though it seems now people are willing to use violence and arms because the Long March has not succeeded.

But then this type of political ideology was always going to decend into violence and armed conflict because thats how it was birthed in the first place. A oppressor and victim worldview so at some point violence will be needed to free the victims if all else fails.
Probably because I happen to thing the outcomes of the "sexual revolution" were good things.
But surely thats a subjective belief. So those who believe that it caused a lot of damage to people and society have an equal say. If a bible believing Christian tells their belief that sex outside marriage is a sin or SSM is a sin then this is not hate and wrong but just the right to express a belief by conscience. The same with those who believe sex outside marriage is good.

So how do we sort that out as to what public policy should be based on. You can't have both. Is it majority rules. Or maybe whoever can get into a position of influence. Maybe have more money behind them to market their morals lol.
The US was not a "Christian nation", then or ever, nor was it "Muslim" or "pagan". It was and is *secular*. (your country may be different, but I am not prepared or inclined to discuss your country.)
Then what did the Colonies base their morals on. What morals did the Federation base it morals on. Was it the majority social norms. What was the majority social norms based on.
In your house, perhaps, not in mine.
OK so does every house have an equal say. Which house holds the truth on what is moral so that we can make a determination over which house we should use as the basis for social policies and laws.
and built in part on false premises
What was the false premise. That abortion was wrong or that society was wrong about thinking abortion was wrong.
As I noted above, I agree with less influence of moralistic Christianity on sex and marriage.
So if we have less influence from Christianity then what influence do we use instead for social norms on sex and marriage.
This is an ongoing conflation of the mores of the 1950s with all periods before then. It just wasn't the case.
Its not a conflation because what the 1950s were using as their basis was the bible which was the same basis for every other time in history. Including back to the early church right up until today. It has not changed. That we can only find certain times where society aligned with those biblical truths is irrelevant as to their truth.

It is those never changing truths that are the basis and what is being used to compare with other beliefs and ideologies on social moral issues. I am saying for the times when society lived up to those truths compared to the alternatives and especially modern progressive norms the differece is stark and conflicting.

That conflict is being played out in the culture wars we see where these norm differences come into contact.
Nah, it's just evidence for an strongly anti-modernist strain of Christianity.
What is a modernist strain of Christianity. You are not even a Christian. How can you know what Christianity is fullstop.
An extreme claim! LOL! It is a literal fact that "laws" and "social norms" are not the same things.
I never said they were the same thing. I said laws are often based off social norms. How did SSM come about. It happened because society had changed and were more open to SSM.

Its a self evident fact that you could not legalise homosexuality within a pro Christian norm lol. The society has to evolve to change to then accept that change in law. They go hand in hand.

I mean even speeding laws have a moral basis. Why is speeding wrong. Because it causes accidents. Why are accidents wrong. Because they can harm and kill people. Is that not a moral basis.
Not sure what that means.
Have you not heard the famous quote "the personal is political which was part of 2nd wave feminism and set the stage for bringing the political into the private sphere.

The famous slogan is "the personal is political," popularized by feminist Carol Hanisch in a 1969 essay. The phrase argues that personal experiences, particularly those of women, are not just private matters but are often rooted in systemic political issues and power structures, such as gender inequality. It served as a rallying cry for second-wave feminism to challenge the idea that public and private life were separate.

Now after decades of such ideologies as Critical theories which build on this politics has moved into every part of our lives. The State is the Father, Mother, Priest, Therapist, Educator and Moral arbitor over everyone.

Now the "the personal is political," this has brought in belief and morality because this is a part of personal. Its all intertwined. So now State policies and laws are not seperated from religion, belief and morals. Thats why we had PC and Woke and all the other radical moralising ideologies like Extinction Rebellions and BLM ect ect ect. Thats why people are fighting in the streets of politics and religion.

You need to do some research. I know you are knowledgable on physics but please don't pretend your a psychologist and sociologist as well.
I suggest you learn more of the early history of your relgion then. In the early decades what we now call Christianity (sometimes called in these contexts the "Jesus movement" or "The Way") was a sect of Judaism. Importantly for my point in inclusion is that Judaism is from outside western culture.
I have studied extensively the early churh. Yes Christianity came from basically a Jewish sect and there were a number. But the important destinction is that it became the only sect or even religion as far as Islam that opened up to non natives or sect members.

When it opened to the Gentiles it opened to western civilisation. Because this is what the Gentiles became, the Western civilisation that was the only civilisation that brought Christianity from that Jewish sect to all nations.

But this makes it even more relevant. Because a a belief from outside the west became the west. Making it even more universal which was the whole point. Its a plus not a negative that this supports its truth.
I am not kidding and do you really need to ask? (I know you know.)
Surely this is your personal opinion and a belief. If Christ is truely the saviour of all humankind then surely this is the greatest thing. Your begging the question that what you believe is the greatest good.

OK so if everything came from the Greeks and Romans what exactly is the good of Christianity in the west. Why did we change history based on Christ in BC and AD. What about universities and hospitals and science itself which was first initiated by Christian scientists trying to discover Gods creation.
It didn't and no one said it did. Certainly not me. What I said is that the things from ancient western culture that *I* find most valuable or important are most certainly not Christian -- democracy, mathematics, the early stages of science, as is the case for the best things of the Enlightenment.
I think its an assumption that these things did not actually come from Christian values. Like democracy was used in the early church that the congregation was to affirm the leaders and the leaders were servants to the people. Or that all are equal in Christ as the basis for equality and human rights.

Remembering that apart from this in the GrecoRoman pagan world there was no such rights. I think you underestimate Christianity and the bibles influence.

In fact the bible is the foundational book for all western literature and canons. It was literally the only book and all other books on truth stem from this. The bible to the west is not just truth but the pre-requisite for truth. I don't any other phenomena has had as much impact on the west as Christianity and the bible.

Anyway it does not matter. Its a fact its a prominent belief and moral code in western nations and one of the options we can use to base society on. As opposed to Islam or Woke or HUmanism or Feminism or any other ideology.
Finally the Romans were quite tolerant of other religions, but the did expect everyone to make the appropriate supplications to the civic and imperial cult. Jews (including Christians) being by then monotheists refused to do so and this cause some trouble.
Which is another way of saying they were intolerant of the Jews and Christians in the end.
Roman philosophers wrote on sexual morality and family without any input from Christianity. This is reality, not some "bias view".
Wrote about what moral basis for sex and family. Which set of morals were they referring to. Was it Venus. Or was this just some personal opinion of a philosopher.

If Roman beliefs about gods are puralistic then it will inherently have to accommodate paga ideas around sex ie sex outside marriage and between any consenting adults. Men could have more than one wife ect as this was a status symbol for me who were the greater sex.
"neither slave nor free" was about salvation through the death of Jesus -- anyone could be saved. It didn't change actual social status of anyone, slave, woman, or Jew.
Actually it means exactly what it says. This verse includes 'neither Jew or Gentile'. It was that all were equal in Christ when it came to salvation. The free were no more better than the slave or the Jew to the Gentile. The Jews were regarded as special to Judaism and the frre were seen as higher status than the slaves. But all were the same in Christ.

But this was not the case for the Romans who went by status and class.
You're going to ask Mr. Morrison for that. Perhaps it was ironic "best"ness given that in the same song he sings of wanting to kill his own mother.
Well the west also brought psychodelic drugs. Maybe thats why he thought the west was the best lol.
We're going to need a part Ic as I have other things to do...
Fair enough
Upvote 0

B flat B♭

@David Lamb @Strong in Him @prodromos & to who ever it may concern.

Just to let you know I am feeling a lot better now thanks to the Lord, thank you for all your kind concerns, I thought I were dying. You are really terrific people on here.

Many blessing :praying:

Apple
Glory to God!
I'm very happy to hear you are feeling better.
  • Friendly
Reactions: Apple Sky
Upvote 0

B flat B♭

@David Lamb @Strong in Him @prodromos & to who ever it may concern.

Just to let you know I am feeling a lot better now thanks to the Lord, thank you for all your kind concerns, I thought I were dying. You are really terrific people on here.

Many blessing :praying:

Apple
I'm so glad you're feeling better.
That must have felt quite scary.
  • Friendly
Reactions: Apple Sky
Upvote 0

Is Hell Annihilationism or Eternal Torment

Ezek 28:

15 “You were blameless in your ways
From the day you were created

Until unrighteousness was found in you.
16 “By the abundance of your trade
You were internally filled with violence,
And you sinned;
Therefore I have cast you as profane
From the mountain of God.
And I have destroyed you, O covering cherub,
From the midst of the stones of fire.
17 “Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty;
You corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor.
I cast you to the ground;
I put you before kings,
That they may see you.
18 “By the multitude of your iniquities,
In the unrighteousness of your trade
You profaned your sanctuaries.
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 “All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”

========================

Malachi 4:
“For behold, the day is coming, burning like a furnace; and all the arrogant and every evildoer will be chaff; and the day that is coming will set them ablaze,” says the Lord of hosts, “so that it will leave them neither root nor branch.” 2 “But for you who fear My name, the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings; and you will go forth and skip about like calves from the stall. 3 You will tread down the wicked, for they will be ashes under the soles of your feet on the day which I am preparing,” says the Lord of hosts.


I find your logic illusive just then

"cease to be forever"
"wages of sin is death but the gift of God is eternal life"
destroyed as in "by reducing them to ashes" 2 Peter 2

No doubt the second death of Rev 20 does involve a great deal of suffering and torment but it ends just as Ezek 28 states even for the devil himself
You failed to understand that Ezek 28 is not speaking about the devil. It's actually about Lucifer, who was not created as a devil, but became "the Devil" or Satan, after He rebelled against God and sinned.

It would really help your cause if you did a bit of a study to understand the surrounding context of the scriptures, you refer to. It's not profitable to just pluck them out of their intended context and misapply them to support your unbiblical opinion.

Yes God will burn the whole earth and every living thing in it, with fervent heat and the elements such as rocks will melt away. But nothing will be annihilated, because He will restore everything and everyone back to their proper estate again. Lucifer was destroyed, so He doesn't exist anymore as Lucifer. Now He exists as Satan or the Devil.

No man will exist in his current form, in the life to come. Some will be resurrected to glory and others to their damnation. But there's no escaping into annihilationism, it's simply not an option.
Upvote 0

The NEA is pushing far left teaching upon children

No, because the pronoun police demand that certain pronouns be used by others. No one here has made that demand. Are you?
One would have thought no demand was required if people just went with what was preferred by the person.

Is using the non-preferred pronoun really so hard for you to do?
Upvote 0

Is Hell Annihilationism or Eternal Torment

  • Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10 is cited to support the belief that the dead "know nothing" and have no activity or knowledge in the grave (Sheol).
  • Psalm 146:4 states that when a person dies, their thoughts perish.
  • Psalm 115:17 indicates that the dead do not praise the Lord.
  • Job 14:10-12 describes death as a state of lying down until a future resurrection.
  • Genesis 3:19, concerning returning to dust, is seen as the punishment for sin, rather than eternal torment.
  • John 11:11-14, where Jesus describes Lazarus' death as a "sleep," is interpreted as a metaphor for the unconscious state of death before resurrection.
Ecclesiastes 9:5-10 should be interpreted as Solomons "under the sun" perspective, meaning it describes life and death from a purely earthly, human point of view, without the full revelation of the afterlife found in the New Testament. The passage serves to highlight the vanity and futility of seeking meaning and fulfillment only in worldly accomplishments and pleasures.

The understanding of the afterlife was limited in the Old Testament compared to the clear teachings of Jesus and the Apostles in the New Testament (e.g., Jesus' resurrection and the promise of eternal life).

The statement that "the dead know nothing" (Ecclesiastes 9:5) is saying, the dead have no further activity or share in earthly affairs. It does not contradict the New Testament teaching that the soul/spirit lives on and returns to God.

All of the other verses you referred to support the Bible doctrine of Eternal Conscious Torment in hell.
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

Well, there we have it. Comitting the textbook example of a war crime is "bold and brave". Extreme solutions are needed to save the lives of your people. You just have to be keep being brutal to solve the problem.

This kind of reasoning has been used to rationalise the worst atrocities of mankind. But with an army as strong as yours and the world too fractured to oppose you, perhaps this time you can kill your way to utopia.
According to this post you sound awfully pro-terrorist. Shame!
Upvote 0

The NEA is pushing far left teaching upon children

So you are saying that you could not answer the question because you could not determine if it was a cat, or a representation of a cat?
No, I said I answered the question. Exactly as I intended.

You are not helping your argument at all.
What argument do you think I'm making, exactly?

In fact, you are making it much worse. The fact that we are even having this discussion proves there is an ideological barrier preventing discernment of reality.
Actually, the fact that we are even having this discussion proves both of us have too much time on our hands.

-- A2SG, the internet really makes distracting yourself a heck of a lot easier...
Upvote 0

The Final Experiment (Flat Earth Bites The Dust)

Nothings being hid, because people have repeatedly gone to the North Pole.

You can even go yourself.

And I still do not get your line of argument. Posting screenshots of Google searches is... nothing except posting screenshots of Google searches.
When one has no training in, or seemingly no awareness of, the skill of critical thinking and the application of logic, it very easy to confuse assertions with evidence and beliefs with proof. If one is raised in such an enviroment I imagine it is very difficult to break free from the clutches of mindless nonsense.

When I was in primary school I remember being given a school book about evolution, diagrams of a fish like creature crawling onto land an artist's impression of ape men sitting round a camp fire having a jolly, based on a single tooth. The people who produce such drivel for children were evidently ideologically driven blinkered zealots, but I have even encountered people in the church who would irrationally defend this stuff.
If your exposure to evolutionary theory is based on a book for primary school children it is hardly surprising you have such a distorted understanding. Perhaps if you were to dip into a handful of the thousands of textbooks on evolution, or the millions of research papers, then the scales on your eyes would fall away and you could view the magnificence of the bioshphere and celebrate the means by which your God created the diversity of life on the planet.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,087
Messages
65,428,772
Members
276,426
Latest member
Gandalfgrey