• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Gallup: Drop in U.S. Religiosity Among Largest in World

The Quran does not allow the execution of those who refuse to convert.

There shall be no compulsion in religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. (Qur'an 2:256)

(There is no compulsion in religion), meaning, "Do not force anyone to become Muslim, for Islam is plain and clear, and its proofs and evidence are plain and clear. Therefore, there is no need to force anyone to embrace Islam. Rather, whoever Allah directs to Islam, opens his heart for it and enlightens his mind, will embrace Islam with certainty. Whoever Allah blinds his heart and seals his hearing and sight, then he will not benefit from being forced to embrace Islam." (Quran 2:256 Tafsir Ibn Kathir)

Those who believe, and those who are Jewish, and the Christians, and the Sabeans—any who believe in God and the Last Day, and act righteously will have their reward with their Lord; they have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve. (Qur'an 2:62)

“The truth is from your Lord. Whoever wills, let him believe. And whoever wills, let him disbelieve” (Qur'an 18:29)


Muhammad didn't use the threat of conversion or death against the people of Mecca

The Prophet Muḥammad’s Covenant with Yūḥannah Ibn Ru’bah and the Christians of Aylah

In accordance with the Qur’anic admonition that there is to be no coercion in matters of faith, the Prophet Muḥammad did not force the Christians he encountered to convert to Islam, nor did the Prophet belittle or ridicule their religion.

Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah - The Life of Muhammad Translated by A. Guillaume

The apostle had instructed his commanders when they entered Mecca only to fight those who resisted them, except a small number who were to be killed even if they were found beneath the curtains of the Kaʿba.

Whoever lays down his arms is safe, and whoever locks his door is safe.

When the apostle prayed the noon prayer on the day of the conquest he ordered that all the idols which were round the Ka'ba should be collected and burned with fire and broken up... [The] Quraysh had put pictures in the Ka'ba including two of Jesus son of Mary and Mary (on both of whom be peace!)... The apostle ordered that the pictures should be erased except those of Jesus and Mary.

"O you people of Quraysh! What do you think of the treatment that I am about to accord to you?"

They replied:

"O noble brother and son of a noble brother! We expect nothing but goodness from you."

Upon this, the Messenger of Allah -peace be upon him- said:

"I speak to you in the same words as Joseph spoke unto his brothers: 'This day, there is no reproof against you; go your way, for you are freed ones!'"
As is expected, you're ignoring my flagging the principle of abrogation and citing a verse from the Medina period. Though this is not the thread for getting into the ins and outs of Islamic jurisprudence.
Upvote 0

The Saving results of the Death of Christ !

Nope, it doesn't change the position...it is the act of drawing itself which creates the possibility, not any metaphysical change in the object being drawn.
No, δύναμαι is not an atmospheric term. It is a predicate of the person. Someone either is able or is not able. That's an expression of an actual capacity possessed or not possessed by the person -- two positions, or states -- not a mere external "possibility" detached from the subject.

So why did you spend such energy arguing the semantics?
Because you (and fhansen, first) found it relevant. I was responding to fhansen's comments on semantics, making the point that it's not relevant to the issue. You then chose to chime in, so I responded to you as well. In my first response to you, I explicitly distinguished the relevance of the semantics from what my argument is.

One conditions the presence of drawing on the success of the act, and the other speaks only to whether the drawing is what makes salvation a possibility. These are not the same question.
They are the same question. You're misrepresenting what the question entails. You're claiming:

Question A ("If drawing can fail, how is one able to come?") supposedly assumes drawing exists only if it succeeds.
Question B ("Does the drawing succeed in making salvation possible, or can it fail in making salvation possible?") supposedly asks whether drawing accomplishes its stated effect.

Thus, you're alleging I switched from one concern (drawing depends on success) to another (drawing achieves possibility). Am I understanding you correctly?

If so, you're still not seeing the point. Both questions are the same question, from two angles. The first question is, what does John say drawing does? What is the drawing act of the Father in John 6:44? The second question merely asks, does that act actually produce the result John attributes to it -- ability?

If drawing is the necessary condition for ability, then the only meaningful question is, does drawing accomplish that? If it doesn't, the verse is false. If it does, then drawing is by definition effectual in the limited sense that it produces ability.

I have not conditioned "the presence of drawing on its success." I have conditioned the truth of John's conditional on its success. You're accusing me of changing the question because you're trying to avoid the logic of the text. Both questions I asked are the same: Does the Father's drawing accomplish the effect John assigns to it -- actual ability? If you say drawing can fail to produce ability, then you've denied the conditional John wrote. If you say drawing always produces ability, then your claim that drawing does not effect movement collapses.
Upvote 0

CNN Dem Panelist Shocks Jennings with Major Admission on Lawfare Against Trump

IMO, you are believing who you want to believe.
If you read his tweets, it's pretty easy to spot his lies. It's not complex. Sometimes he says stupid stuff too ("Pharmaceuticals are going down 600%"). You can count that as stupid or a lie....hard to tell for sure.
Upvote 0

Gallup: Drop in U.S. Religiosity Among Largest in World

Properly understood, it absolutely does. But that takes engagement with Islamic scholarship and the Sunnah material, where it is clear that Muhammad used the threat of conversion or death against the people of Mecca when he overthrew the city. And forms that deny death for apostasy are the exception, whereas it is the prescriptive punishment by pretty much all mainline divisions(sunni, shia, sufi)
The Quran does not allow the execution of those who refuse to convert.

There shall be no compulsion in religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. (Qur'an 2:256)

(There is no compulsion in religion), meaning, "Do not force anyone to become Muslim, for Islam is plain and clear, and its proofs and evidence are plain and clear. Therefore, there is no need to force anyone to embrace Islam. Rather, whoever Allah directs to Islam, opens his heart for it and enlightens his mind, will embrace Islam with certainty. Whoever Allah blinds his heart and seals his hearing and sight, then he will not benefit from being forced to embrace Islam." (Quran 2:256 Tafsir Ibn Kathir)

Those who believe, and those who are Jewish, and the Christians, and the Sabeans—any who believe in God and the Last Day, and act righteously will have their reward with their Lord; they have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve. (Qur'an 2:62)

“The truth is from your Lord. Whoever wills, let him believe. And whoever wills, let him disbelieve” (Qur'an 18:29)


Muhammad didn't use the threat of conversion or death against the people of Mecca

The Prophet Muḥammad’s Covenant with Yūḥannah Ibn Ru’bah and the Christians of Aylah

In accordance with the Qur’anic admonition that there is to be no coercion in matters of faith, the Prophet Muḥammad did not force the Christians he encountered to convert to Islam, nor did the Prophet belittle or ridicule their religion.

Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah - The Life of Muhammad Translated by A. Guillaume

The apostle had instructed his commanders when they entered Mecca only to fight those who resisted them, except a small number who were to be killed even if they were found beneath the curtains of the Kaʿba.

Whoever lays down his arms is safe, and whoever locks his door is safe.

When the apostle prayed the noon prayer on the day of the conquest he ordered that all the idols which were round the Ka'ba should be collected and burned with fire and broken up... [The] Quraysh had put pictures in the Ka'ba including two of Jesus son of Mary and Mary (on both of whom be peace!)... The apostle ordered that the pictures should be erased except those of Jesus and Mary.

"O you people of Quraysh! What do you think of the treatment that I am about to accord to you?"

They replied:

"O noble brother and son of a noble brother! We expect nothing but goodness from you."

Upon this, the Messenger of Allah -peace be upon him- said:

"I speak to you in the same words as Joseph spoke unto his brothers: 'This day, there is no reproof against you; go your way, for you are freed ones!'"
Upvote 0

CNN Dem Panelist Shocks Jennings with Major Admission on Lawfare Against Trump

Ya can't say that it's not possible.
In the case of the falsified documents, it's not possible. Trump didn't argue that they were fakes. They were his business documents, and the defense tried to unconvincingly explain them into non-falseness.
Upvote 0

CNN Dem Panelist Shocks Jennings with Major Admission on Lawfare Against Trump

Try one of the 3,300 such cases. If one can't bare to consider something that's possible, as a possibility, they've lost their ability to reason objectively.
Considering the evidence the prosecution had, and given the high profile of the case (and the defendant), with the scrutiny that entails, the possibility of faking that evidence to frame Trump is so unlikely, well, the Kubrick story seems downright plausible by comparison.

-- A2SG, plus which, that there will inevitably be appeals is guaranteed....
Upvote 0

Refuting Losing Salvation!

You are right that the law cannot save, it shows us our sins, not just the Jews.
Yes, we're responsible for more than the 10 C's. Christians already do this and more, because with the completion of the NT, we know and "have the mind of Christ" (1Co 2:16); which they did not start with (this isn't competing with Israel but just stating truth, as Christians started with the Gospel, and which already covers what Israel did with the 10 C's - Rom 2:14,15).
The law shows us we are sinner and our need for Jesus to save us from our sins Mat1:21 (not in them), we need to be willing to come to Him and repent, which means a change of heart and in direction, turning from what is wrong and doing what is right through love and faith. John14:15 Exo20:6
True! Romans 2:14-15 indicates that Gentiles, who do not have the law, can naturally do what the law requires, showing that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts. This suggests that they are already following moral principles similar to those found in the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments). gordonferguson.org Bible Hub
Upvote 0

Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’

Democrats unite the nation (and even Congress)

House votes to approve releasing the Epstein files by a near unanimous margin

The measure passed by a vote of 427 to 1.

"I'm all for it," Trump said from the Oval Office

Trump does not need legislation in order to approve the files for release

[Rep Clay Higgins R-LA was the lone Nay.]

ETA: Passed the Senate with a unanimous consent vote.
Johnson and Trump aren't too happy that the Senate passed it without any amendments.
Upvote 0

Do you keep the Sabbath? (poll)

Paul is explaining to the Gentiles that the Blood of goats and the Priesthood "Works of the Law" is not why they received the Spirit of understanding. It was their obedience to God, as Peter also teaches, which is called "Faith". When the same Gospel was given to the Israelites, most of them didn't believe God, and subsequently didn't "obey Him". Here is what God said about them.
You are missing the fact that Paul mentions Circumcision in respect to Titus not being circumcised, Judeans not living as the Gentiles live but as do the Jews, and being separate from those who are not Jews in chapter 2 of Galatians. All of these are laws which are within the Book of the Law that is mentioned in verse 3:10. Ergo the law mentioned that does not justify is the Book of the Law. As it is written, the just (the righteous) live out of faith vs 11, the faith that establishes the law. The faith Abraham had. For the word, the commandments and statutes contained in the Book of the Law is in our heart and in our mouth that we do it. That is the word of faith that we preach and must hear. The Law, the commandments and statutes contained in the Book of the Law are in our hearts and minds. He has given us His Spirit to cause us to walk in in His way. For the written Law on Stone and parchment made no one righteous, not one. But the Lord has said, I will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed. The circumcision made without hands, cutting away the sins of the flesh, that we can serve the living God. Not by the letter, the knowledge of sin. But by the Spirit. For the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life..

For that which was on the outside, the Law on stone and parchment is within. We are new creature begotten by the Word of truth. So Let us not forget what manner man we are now, or are to be, and be a doer of the Word that we are begotten of and not a hearer only deceiving ourselves. For we have conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Begotten by the Word of truth. Jam 1 and Rom 8

My friend and friends there are some truths shared in the post that you might not of took noticed to. I will repost it again and highlight one in particular which should have raised questions from you.

The obeying the voice of God is of the hearing of faith that Paul speaks of in Galatians 3. We know this to be true because verse 6 starts with the words “even as” when the spirit speaks of Abraham believing God. And all this is being said in respect to Paul speaking of us being dead but alive, yet not us but the Christ living in us. And the life we now live in the flesh we live by the faith OF the Son of God who gave himself for us. And this Faith is how we are justified. Because we Know that a man is not justified (made righteous) by the works of the law, if not (except) by (through) the faith of Jesus Christ, as verse 2:16 says

Works of the law is what we do. That is the context. Circumcision, not fellowshipping with the heathen, and not living as they do are all mentioned in respect to these works and all are laws within the Book of the Law which is mentioned within the same context in chapter 3. Couple that with verse 17 where it mentions if we are found sinners while we seek to be justified, made righteous through Christ, is Christ the minister of sin? God forbid it says! This tells us two things. For one this justification is much more than a cleansing from what we done. It is so much more. For it is Christ in us ministering to our hearts and minds, our every being to comply with His Spirit.

How do we know? Because it says if we are found sinners during this justification is Christ the minister of sin? God forbid we made ourselves transgressors!

The goal here through Christ is sinlessness. Which is the only righteousness in God's eyes. For it is written, He that does righteousness is righteous even as He is righteous. He that sins is of the devil. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested. That He might destroy the works of the Devil. Verse 16 says we believe into Christ that we might be made righteous by the faith of Christ. For faith establishes the law as Romans 3 states. This is the context and is missed by all due bad translations and poor exegesis. We believe into Jesus Christ that we might be justified, made righteous through the Faith of Jesus Christ. For the Just shall live out of this faith.

How do we know that verse16 is to be translated this way. Because verse 20 concurs when it says I am dead but alive yet not I, but Christ lives in me. And the Life I now live in the flesh; I live by the faith OF the Son of God who gave himself for me. Couple this with vers 17 where if it explicitly states, if righteousness, not justification. If righteousness came by the Law then Christ died in vain, for nothing. Hence why verse 16 should be translated, a man is not justified (made righteous) by the works of the law, if not (except) through the faith OF Jesus Christ, even we have believed into Jesus Christ, that we might be justified (made righteous) through the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. For the Just shall live out of this faith of Christ. And this faith of Christ establishes the Law.


Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified (made righteous) by the works of the law, if not (except) by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed into Jesus Christ, that we might be justified (made righteous) through the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Gal 2:17 But if, while we seek to be justified (made righteous) IN Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.
Gal 2:18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.
Gal 2:19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.
Gal 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.


To be under the Law means to be under it's tutorage, for it is called our school master. But we are no longer under the schoolmaster that was to bring us to Christ and the righteousness of the faith that is of Christ if we are IN Christ and living through Christ and the faith He instills. For as many of us who have been baptized into Christ, have put on Christ. And we are all children of God through the Faith in Christ and live according to this faith. Just as Abraham who did not have the School master, the Book of the Law but lived in accordance through the faith that establishes the Law, that the righteous live by. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female, Scott or studyman: for we are all one in Christ Jesus living by the faith of Christ. Not by the school master, the Book of the Law, but by Faith.



Gal 3:23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

Gal 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Gal 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God through the faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.



We are not under the Law, the Book of the Law, the school master. For if righteousness came by the law, the Book of the Law Christ died in vain. For those who desire to be under the School master, the Book of the Law for righteousness, do you not hear it? This of the old Covenant of Sinia which gendereth bondage. For the knowledge of sin and the sacrificial system never made anyone righteous. For he that commits sin is a servant to it.
And there is only one cure for that. And that is the New Covenant through Christ and the Faith He offers. This faith speaks on this wise, say not in your heart, bring Christ down from above or up from the deep. But say, the Word. the Law is in our hearts and in our mouths. THIS IS THE FAITH in which we preach We are new creation in Christ Jesus, Not of the letter, of tablets of stone and parchment, but of the Spirit that we do it. This is the faith in which we preach. Born of the Spirit, for He was the firstborn among many brethren. The new ministry, not of the letter, for the letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth Life. Not that our sufficiency is of ourselves. But our sufficiency is of God. Who has made us abled ministers of the New with the Law in our hearts and minds through His Spirit. That the righteousness of the Law be fulfilled in us. Who walk after the Spirit and not after the flesh. If ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law Gal 5:18. But if we are sinning then the Law is for us and we are still under it and have not come to Christ in His fullness. For we know that the Law is not for the righteous man in Christ but for the ungodly and for sinners the Spirit shares in 1 Tim:8-10.


1Tim 1:8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
1Tim 1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
1Tim 1:10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

Gal 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
Gal 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
Gal 4:23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Gal 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
Gal 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Gal 4:27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
Gal 4:28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
Gal 4:29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Gal 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
Gal 5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Upvote 0

Hell doesn't exist and there is no eternal suffering, instead bad peolle just cease to exist

And, Jesus does save all people, you know, being the Savior of the world, so there's that as well.

Do you assume that I abhor the thought of that being true, like Dan1988 does with his "God is hate" nonsense on the previous page? Not at all. I cannot deny that universal reconciliation (I assume that is the position you take with these words) does have some Scriptural evidence - more than eternal torment, actually - and I would be overjoyed to find out that it was the true interpretation in the end. I only take up the conditional immortality stance because it has more evidence in Scripture to me than the other two positions: universalism and eternal torment. But I pray almost daily that the Lord has mercy on us all despite our sins, and saves us all through Jesus Christ one way or another, and I most certainly do presume to cry out for His mercy and forgiveness while demanding that others are left in the dark of unforgiveness and wrath forever.
Upvote 0

Clinton's avoiding deposition

That's not what "avoiding subpoenas" means. "Avoiding subpoenas" is dodging process servers.
Thank you - I corrected it
What the Clintons (no apostrophe)
sp:dr (spelling patrol; didn't read)

are doing is negotiating a deposition date (and perhaps intentionally delaying it).
Not perhaps - they are intentionally using delays - what are they scared of?
The article implies the negotiations began before the demanded date, so they didn't do that other thing that sometimes happens "failed to appear".
Re-read the article - it says the depositions were scheduled for October

Gues what - they were delayed again.

See how helpful reading AI facts can be?
Upvote 0

Hell doesn't exist and there is no eternal suffering, instead bad peolle just cease to exist

Yes, you ought to be shocked. The Bible doctrine of hell, is a very sobering and shocking doctrine to fresh converts and new commers. But I'm sure you will eventually come to the table. You can deny the doctrine, all, you want, but that will never change the truth of the matter.

I was once at the table, actually, for the first twelve years of my time as a believer. Thirteen years years after that, and I still intend to never return to "the table". Just because eternal torment and inherently immortality of the soul is the popular/mainstream doctrine among Christians doesn't mean it is the correct one. Far as I am concerned, it is worldly, carnal, pagan, and most of all, lacking in Scriptural evidence.
Upvote 0

He’s a citizen with a Real ID. ICE detained him anyway. Twice.

You need to stop your Strawman. No where did I call ICE racist. It seems that you have a standard reply to anyone that disagrees with you. I’m not from the left. My issue is with the trampling of the 4th amendment. You know, the constitution? The same constitution that you should be defending?
The constitution protects from unreasonable searches and seizures. It is not a blanket protection from law enforcement

With over 20,000,000 illegal aliens in the US, now down to probably 18,000,000, the ICE raids are not unreasonable

It is your opinion that illegal immigration is not a problem, but our president disagrees. Article II and current statutes give him the sole discretion to determine what constitutes an invasion, what is a problem and where law enforcement needs to be directed

Latinos can protect themselves by knowing their rights and having proper encounters with law enforcement. If they are citizens, they will enjoy the freedoms that accompany citizenship

Your whining about the 4th amendment does not override article II or article I which gave the president statutory authority. Don’t like him? Vote him out

In the current declaration, it is not unreasonable to question anyone’s immigration status. Citizens need to be prepared to defend their freedom by supporting law enforcement not fighting them. Illegal aliens should live in fear, they are here illegally. Self deport of face law enforcement. They have a choice.



I could see if we were rounding up Latinos and herding them into concentration camps or ghettos, but that it not the case. They are being deported according to the civil penalty that follows their act if they are here illegally.

It is written that a house divided against itself cannot stand. Too long we have been subject to agitators who wish to use the constitution against their own country. The fourteenth amendment does not confer birthright citizenship , and the fourth amendment does not protect against reasonable searches and seizures, the fifth amendment is only applicable if citizens know how to properly invoke it. If they waive their rights knowingly or unknowingly, they are not protected by the fifth amendment.
It is only an opinion that people have about the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment that causes our current problem , and we had plenty of subversives that wish to use article III against their own country.
Same thing happened to President Lincoln, and he invoked the insurrection act. The Supreme Court will hopefully clarify things soon. That is constitutional, subversive opinion is not
Upvote 0

Why do people hate ICE...

ICE employee among 16 men arrested in Bloomington sex trafficking sting, police say

More than a dozen men have been arrested after trying to solicit a minor for sex in Bloomington, Minnesota, police say.

"When he was arrested, he said, 'I'm ICE, boys,'" [Police Chief] Hodges said during a press conference Tuesday. "Well, unfortunately for him, we locked him up."

Several months ago, police conducted a similar sting that led to the arrest of ex-State Sen. Justin Eichorn, who is currently facing federal solicitation charges.

See also:

  • Informative
Reactions: Paulos23
Upvote 0

The Saving results of the Death of Christ !

Respectfully, I'm not here for your entertainment. I've specifically challenged you on this already and you've not engaged that argument. If you are unwilling to do so, that says enough about the strength of your position.
This reads:

"If he is able, then he has been drawn, and I will raise him up on the last day."

Compare that to what you said:

"All who come have been drawn, and I will raise them up on the last day." (My emphasis)

Your paraphrase collapses ability (q) into actual coming, thereby reading into the verse what John did not say. Yes, of course those who come have been drawn (theologically true), but the grammar of John 6:44 is not framed as "those who come"; it is framed as "those who are made able to come." The final clause then identifies the enabled person as the one Christ will raise.
But how is that different from my statement, "All who come have been drawn [enabled to come]..."
And of course only enabled persons will come but the verse does not insist or mandate that all who are enabled will come. Grace makes a real change in the person: they are now able to come. Grace is not irresistible.
Upvote 0

Can not being in the correct denomination cause someone to not be saved?

If you know the Lutherans got it right but you stay a Methodist because all your friends are there then you could be in big trouble. Follow the truth. Follow it as best you know it. If you don't, if you know something to be true but you don't follow it, how can you make the claim that God should save you?
I would like to know for sure whether or not this is Catholic doctrine. The two points of particular interest are 1) that acting according to what you believe to be true, even if what you believe to be true is not true in fact, substantiates a claim that God should save you, and 2) that God saves a person based on a judgement that the person acted consistently with his beliefs (no matter how trivial those actions and beliefs were).
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,404
Messages
65,417,145
Members
276,382
Latest member
bonniegoodgod