• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

I hate being homosexual. It's an awful life

God didn't make you gay, life in a sinful world created the cocktail of early developmental factors that inclined you towards homosexuality and the accumulation of your choices solidified that inclination. Sexuality isn't as rigid as homosexual activists claim it to be, so there is hope that through making the right choices and continued prayer you can be set free of the trap.
Upvote 0

The Reality of Free Will

The Bible is filled with direct commands and choices, which only make sense if the recipient is capable of selecting between alternatives.

"I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life...'
Scripture proves a choice between two trees in Eden. A choice under the law to choose life and live. A choice to count the cost of answering GODS call, again one of life or death. Perhaps this is why many are called but few are chosen. Without free will how would GOD judge us righteously ? Are we condemned to death for reasons we had no part in ? Even though GOD is omniscient this means HE knows all things but HE has not caused all things. Did GOD force Lucifer to rebel ? Did HE force Adam to sin ? Or is it that HE just knew in advance all these things and made them all work together for good in the end ? The father of lies and sin isn’t GOD, it’s Satan . In order for humanity to choose between good and evil the presence of both is required and in this Satan is but a tool GOD uses. In eternity GOD knew before HE created the angels that a third of them would sin against HIM and it would be their free will choice to do so. GOD permitted this angelic sin knowing HE could use these fallen angels in HIS work to make human beings a joint heir with HIS son of all things HE created. GOD has in eternity known all HIS saints even having their names in the Lambs book of life from the foundation of the world. This HE could do because HE knew who would genuinely repent and submit to HIS will and those who would not. GOD has known the free will choices of humanity but did not make them for humanity. GOD planned out HIS salvation with all this in HIS mind. It is extremely important to GOD that we have free will because HE wants us to love HIM with it.
Upvote 0

Hell doesn't exist and there is no eternal suffering, instead bad peolle just cease to exist

I mean, when He told us to "love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you", of course we were all supposed to understand that, all the while, the One who commanded us to love our enemies is planning to torture His enemies alive for eternity. >_>
As many who live under the oppression of bullies would one day hope for their oppressors, failing to understand that those bullies were the product of whatever made them that way, and in seeking revenge, the victim has also become the bully
Upvote 0

"Don't Give up the Ship"

Not to the degree that it will be for some random enlisted guy who decides to refuse an order and gets court marshalled and kicked out of the service, and then has to face the social backlash back home without the luxuries of 24/7 security and gated neighborhoods like Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin have the privilege of having.

Does anyone featured in that video montage unilaterally have the power to legally protect a servicemen who refuses an order from their commanding officer?

If the answer to that is "No" (which it is), then they shouldn't be encouraging them to go rogue.

That'd be like me going down to the accounts payable department at my company, and encouraging them to disobey their boss over a personal beef I have with him. I can't protect them if he decides to fire them, so it'd be unethical and irresponsible of me to encourage that behavior, as I won't be the one who faces the the brunt of the consequences of it.
Part if what I meant was I don’t they had the forethought of this reaction.
Upvote 0

Hell doesn't exist and there is no eternal suffering, instead bad peolle just cease to exist

There are some of you who for whatever reasons will insist that the One person in all of human history who never spoke anything but the truth, for He is Truth, did not mean what He was plainly saying.

Yeah, you're right. If only folk like @JulieB67 , @timothyu , and myself would just accept the plain saying from Jesus in Matthew 10:28 "destroy both soul and body in hell" as really meaning "keep both body and soul alive in endless torment in hell" like eternal torment proponents do.
If only we could understand that what Jesus plainly meant by John 3:36 "and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him", is really "he that believeth not the Son shall see life in hell instead of life in Heaven, where the wrath of God does not result in actual destruction but goes on conciously for all eternity, keeping sin and sinners alive in His perfect kingdom". If only we could understand what Jesus was plainly saying in verses such these, like the eternal torment proponents do, right?

I mean, when He told us to "love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you", of course we were all supposed to understand that, all the while, the One who commanded us to love our enemies is planning to torture His enemies alive for eternity. >_>
___________

I don't mean to be unkind. I love you all, and with all the love of Christ within me. And it is because of that love that I humbly say to you. You better give heed to His words

To you I say, regardless of your level of education, you are a fool. Repent of your nonsense before you become a damned fool.

What's nonsense here is your claiming to love us and not trying to be unkind in one breath, and then condemn us to burn alive for eternity in God's name unless we turn back to the eternal torment doctrine (i.e. your way of thinking, and you cannot prove it is also God's way) in the next breath. I mean, come on.

And also, while we're on the subject of, in your quoted words at the top of this post, what "He was plainly saying", didn’t Jesus say somewhere in at least one of the four gospels that someone who calls his brother a fool would be in danger of those very fires of Gehenna/hell?
So, is it not you who needs to watch his words or change how he thinks lest he come under the same condemnation with which he was implicitly condemning both the conditionalists/annihilationists and universality in this thread?
Upvote 0

What happens if someone dies before they became a believer, is it their fault?

Can you demonstrate that anything can happen besides what does happen? Can you demonstrate the actual possibility of other options? Or is that only in our thinking? When God demands that we choose, do we not always only choose the one option? Was God not aware of those decisions before creating, but went ahead and created anyway? Well, then! He INTENDED it to be decided the way it was.
That is the same as asking you can you show all "apparent" free will choices could never have gone a different way?
Otherwise, you need to demonstrate that {actual "chance" can determine outcomes}. The notion is by definition self-contradictory. But your whole construction depends on it.

You are defining justice according to the creature's ability to do what he is commanded to do. Sorry, but the command does not imply the ability to obey— it only implies the responsibility to obey. God is not unjust to create beings who will pay for their rebellion, as intended. He is making use of them for his Glory, to demonstrate his love and mercy to the objects of his mercy—us.
Upvote 0

Are the Jews Israel, or is the church Israel? Or does it depend on the context of the passage?

You asked for simple answers, I did my best.

Its only a strange belief if one has allowed themselves to be tethered to a single side of the issue.

Satan loves this or that questions which keep the children of God, and would be children of God alike, in constant conflict and turmoil. As is evidenced so clearly in these forums.
So,

1. How can ethnic natural Christ-rejecting Israel be partakers of the good olive tree (Romans 11) when it is a believing tree? Only the international redeemed Church can fulfil this.
2. How can the "citizenship of Israel" in Ephesians 2 relate to ethnic natural Christ-rejecting Israel when its citizens are brought in exclusively through the blood of Christ to that privileged place? Only the international redeemed Church can fulfil this.
3. How can ethnic natural Christ-rejecting Israel be partakers of "the Israel of God" in Galatians 6:15-16 when it relates to those who are “a new creature” in Christ? Only the international redeemed Church can fulfil this.
4. How can ethnic natural Christ-rejecting Israel constitute "the circumcision" in Romans 2:25-29; Philippians 3:3 and Colossians 2:11 when this is a spiritual title? Only the international redeemed Church can fulfil this.
5. How can ethnic natural Christ-rejecting Israel be seen as "the children of Abraham" (Romans 4:11; 4:13-15; 4:16-18; 9:6-8; Galatians 3:7-9; 3:12-14; 3:16 and 3:26-29 when Jesus told the Christ-rejecting Jews: "Ye are of your father the devil" (John 8:44). Only the international redeemed Church can fulfil this.
6. I agree with this one. We the Church alone reside and abide in "Jerusalem" and "Mount Zion" (Matthew 21:42-46; John 3:3; Romans 9:33; 11:26; Ephesians 1:3; Ephesians 2:4-6; Philippians 3:20; Hebrews 12:22 and 1 Peter 2:5-10.
Upvote 0

"Don't Give up the Ship"

Because there is an ongoing risk that Defendants will act unlawfullyand thereby injure Plaintiffs, Governor Newsom and the State of California, the CourtENJOINS Defendants from violating the Posse Comitatus Act as detailed below.
From an ai check - 40 different resources:

  • In June 2025, a federal district judge (Charles Breyer) initially ruled that Trump's federalization of ~2,000–4,000 California National Guard troops for operations in Los Angeles was illegal (violating statutes and the Constitution).
  • The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals quickly stayed (temporarily blocked) that lower court order, allowing Trump to retain federal control of the troops while appeals proceeded. This effectively overturned the block in the short term.
  • Subsequent rulings (including in August/September 2025) went back and forth, with some lower court decisions again finding aspects of the deployments unlawful, but appeals have generally kept federal control in place for the LA-related operations for now.
  • Separate but related cases blocked deployments of California Guard troops to Oregon/Portland.
That failed -

What was the video's purpose - what order was illegal - answer - not a one.
Upvote 0

The Reality of Free Will

Where is the noun, and does this mean you are finished with the discussion and want to spend the remainder of time arguing about a word?
It's better to address the question of whether or not God gave man free will.
Does GOD force salvation on anyone ? Hebrews 10:26 to willingly, willfully sin after being converted there is no more sacrifice for sins. This describes a person who with knowledge of the truth blasphemes the Holy Spirit , there is no forgiveness. Mark 3:29 This concept of human free will was demonstrated in the free will offering Exodus 35:5 Exodus 25:2-7 this concept was continued in the new covenant, 2 Corinthians 9:7 2 Corinthians 8:3-5 2 Corinthians 8:8 Unless you had a shotgun wedding you married your wife willingly because you truly loved her. In a similar sense we love GOD and our neighbor. True love is given willingly, freely otherwise it is not true. You can’t command anyone to love you they must love you because they want to. Matthew 22:37 GOD IS love, GOD loves us willingly and freely and we are to love HIM back in the same way as well as our neighbor. If true love can’t be understood then free will can’t either
Upvote 0

Sin and the Crucifixion were all predestined

Very good! I'm curious—how do you view T.U.L.I.P. ?
Being I am not a Calvinist, I am unfamiliar with the acronym T.U.L.I.P. So my reply is based off of what I got from a quick search.

Total Depravity: This assumes that spiritual death is a cessation of the spirit. If this was true, then I would agree with total depravity. However, I do not believe spiritual death to be the cessation of the spirit, but rather the spirit going into a dormant state where it is no longer sensitive to God's presence. But, it is still capable of responding to the convicting work of the Holy Spirit. If our spirit was actually dead, then even the convicting work of the Holy Spirit would be of no use, and we would remain lost.
Also, and I can't say this with absolute certainty, because we are made in the image of God, I believe the cessation of any part of our being: body, soul, or spirit would result in what looks like physical death. God is revealed to us in three persons, but all are still one God. Being in the image of God we too are made up of three parts, as I just described. These three parts are what makes us human. This would explain why in the new age, we receive new physical bodies. Not only to maintain the image of God, but because we cannot exist without all three parts.

Unconditional Election: I heard TD Jakes say once that God choosing to save whomever it is He chooses to save is a great display of His grace because no one deserves salvation. Rather than lose everyone, God chooses to save some. To me this doesn't paint a very attractive picture of God. If God is capable of saving some, then He is clearly capable of saving all, yet chooses not to? This does not sound like the God presented to us in the bible.

Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints: These next three are all based of the premise that it is our sins that separate us from God. That salvation is found in getting our sins forgiven. This same premise applies to almost all forms of Christianity being preached today.

Ours sins are not the problem. They are not what separates us from God. Our sin is a form of behavior. Our sinful behavior is a symptom of our condition, not the cause. Our condition is that of spiritual death. Spiritual death was the punishment Adam and Eve received for their disobedience. Because spiritual death plus spiritual death will always equal spiritual death, we've all come into the world already spiritually dead (separated from God). The symptom of our condition, being separated from God, is that we sin.

Now because it is not our sins that separate us from God, getting our sins forgiven isn't going to save us. We are saved when we place our faith in God for salvation. The forgiveness of sins is what makes salvation possible. Everyone from the cross forward has come into the world already forgiven of their sins (this was made know when God tore the temple curtain). Salvation however (which is found in the resurrection), only occurs once we place our faith in God. So now if God has forgiven all of mankind, then clearly salvation must also be available to all of mankind.

When the Holy Spirit convicts us, it is not of our sin, but of our unbelief. All sin is forgiven, but our unbelief isn't. This we must choose to repent of.

Because the punishment for all sin was forgiven at the cross, there remains no more punishment to be handed out by God. Because there is no more punishment left to be handed out, there is no longer any possibility of spiritual death, separation from God. Because spiritual death is no longer a possibility, there is no way to lose your salvation, or to wilfully lose it by walking away since you can't wilfully choose to spiritually die. That is in God's hands alone.

Having said all this, in the end, I honestly don't think it matters what one believes in terms of salvation, but rather who we believe in for salvation. Anyone who places their faith in God for salvation will be saved, regardless of whatever else they choose to believe.

Now before anyone comes at me with their nickers in a knot claiming that John 14:6 says we must believe in Jesus to be saved... let me be the first to remind you that Jesus is God! Not simply a means too God. He established the fact that He is God in the first part of the verse. Therefore, He is not saying no comes to the Father/God/Me except through the Father/God/Me. This makes absolutely no sense. Why do you need to go through God in order to get too God when going through God means you're already with God?

What Jesus is actually saying is that regardless of how you choose to come to God, you will have come through Him. He is the one that made salvation possible. It is only through His forgiveness of sins that anyone can now come into the presence of God for salvation.
Upvote 0

Berkeley Teacher Plots ‘War’ On Conservative Students: ‘By All Means Necessary’

For Trump verbally attacked means the press asking him a question he doesn’t want to answer.
Well? There is room for improvement, but given his age, I doubt he will change. His personality can definitely be a turn off to some. I get it.
Upvote 0

the myth of flat earth debunked again

I’m a young earth creationist and I don’t see any conclusive evidence to support evolution. Evidence in support of a particular theory or position doesn’t verify the validity of that theory or position if the evidence is inconclusive.
A theory is never proved conclusively.
Upvote 0

"Don't Give up the Ship"

And where is this happening? Cite Court case if you would please.
Congress spoke clearly in 1878 when it passed the Posse Comitatus Act, prohibitingthe use of the U.S. military to execute domestic law. Nearly 140 years later, Defendants—President Trump, Secretary of Defense Hegseth, and the Department of Defense—deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, ostensibly to quell a rebellionand ensure that federal immigration law was enforced. There were indeed protests in LosAngeles, and some individuals engaged in violence. Yet there was no rebellion, nor wascivilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law.

Because there is an ongoing risk that Defendants will act unlawfullyand thereby injure Plaintiffs, Governor Newsom and the State of California, the CourtENJOINS Defendants from violating the Posse Comitatus Act as detailed below.
Upvote 0

Berkeley Teacher Plots ‘War’ On Conservative Students: ‘By All Means Necessary’

The vast majority of violent rhetoric, the vast majority of attempts to silence and control those who disagree, and the vast majority of violent actions are coming from opponents of conservatives.
This has been soundly refuted in other threads, as well as in this one. How many times do you have to lose this argument?
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,878,490
Messages
65,418,470
Members
276,385
Latest member
Eisheth333