• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Was Jesus feeling deep anger near Lazarus' tomb?

New Living Translation, Jn 11:

34 When Jesus saw [Mary] weeping and saw the other people wailing with her, a deep anger welled up within him, and he was deeply troubled.
English Standard Version:

When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in his spirit and greatly troubled.
He was deeply moved
ἐνεβριμήσατο (enebrimēsato)
Verb - Aorist Indicative Middle - 3rd Person Singular
Strong's 1690: From en and brimaomai; to have indignation on, i.e. to blame, to sigh with chagrin, to sternly enjoin.

Strong's Greek: 1690. ἐμβριμάομαι (embrimaomai) — 5 Occurrences

G1690 had a few nuances. BDAG:
① insist on someth. sternly, warn sternly
② As an expr. of anger and displeasure
③ to feel strongly about someth., be deeply moved

On Biblehub, 19 versions used "deeply moved"; only 3 said "anger" or "angry".

NLT:

34 “Where have you put him?” he asked them.
They told him, “Lord, come and see.” 35 Then Jesus wept.
Jesus wept. I don't think he was angry.

36 The people who were standing nearby said, “See how much he loved him!” 37 But some said, “This man healed a blind man. Couldn’t he have kept Lazarus from dying?”
38 Jesus was still angry as he arrived at the tomb, a cave with a stone rolled across its entrance. 39 “Roll the stone aside,” Jesus told them.
I don't think Jesus had a fit of sustained deep anger during that time; rather, he was deeply moved by the situation.

Sodom would be better off than Capernaum on judgment day

Genesis 13:


Jude 1:


Jude used the example of Sodom and Gomorrah to illustrate eternal fire punishment.

But then, Luke 10:



The healing was a sign or demonstrative miracle.


Jesus asserted (by "I tell you") that on the day of final judgment, the wicked people of Sodom would have more hope than the people of the town that rejected Jesus' message of the kingdom of God.


On the day of the final judgment, there is some hope for the people of Tyre and Sidon.

The LORD summarily judged the cities of Sodom, Gomorrha, Tyre, and Sidon without giving them the benefits of healing miracles and the good news. In the final judgment, Jesus would take this into consideration: some of the people from these cities will be saved. On the other hand, people from Capernaum would not have this excuse:


They saw Jesus' miracles and yet refused to believe. They had no excuse. The judgment on you depends on how much you have known and seen.


That's the solemn warning: Do not reject Jesus' good news.

=======================================================================

Appendix: FOL analysis of Jesus' hypothetical statement

Contemporary English Version, Mt 11:


Consider the compound proposition: If P, then Q where P and Q are simple propositions and if is a first-order logical operator.

Let R = If the miracles that took place in your town had happened in Sodom, it would still be standing.

P = The miracles that took place in your town had happened in Sodom.
Q = It would still be standing.

Case 1: A usual human spoke statement R

R is a hypothetical statement. We know that historically, P did not happen. It was not true in reality. If P is false, then the truth value of Q does not matter, and R is always true, according to the FOL truth table of the if operator. If P is an impossible hypothetical scenario (i.e., P is false), then Q can be anything. And R is fine. E.g., if the moon is made of cheese, then Trump is God. The last material conditional is a vacuously true FOL statement.

Case 2: Jesus spoke R

He was saying this: Assume that P is true. If P is true, then Q will be true as well. Jesus asserted R to be true. In modal logic, this counterfactual is not vacuous.

You can choose not to believe in Jesus' assertion. That's up to you. Here, I have explained his assertion R in terms of FOL's if.

Was it possible for the LORD to have performed demonstrative miracles in Sodom before he destroyed it?

Yes, all things are possible with God (Mt 19:26). But he chose not to do the miracles.

Why not?

So that Jesus could then use it as an example to illustrate eternal fire punishment and the notion that judgment on you depends on how much you have known and seen.

Does Mt 11:23b imply that God could have done demonstrative miracles in Sodom?

Yes, proof by contradiction:

Let assumption N1 = God could not have done demonstrative miracles in Sodom.

It was impossible for God to perform positive miraculous signs in Sodom. Now, P has a truth value of F (false). Q can take on any proposition, and R will still be true. This line of reasoning does not prove anything. Trump is not God.

However, Jesus asserted that Sodom would be better off than Bethsaida on the judgment day, using Mt 11:23b to prove it. This is the contradiction that I am looking for.

Therefore N1 is false. The truth is that God could have done demonstrative miracles in Sodom.
I agree, ignorance of God can excuse the Sodomites. At least some of them. Eternal punishment wouldn't be "tolerable"; limited punishment with forgiveness would be.

PS: Jude is referring to the "eternal destruction" of Sodom, not eternal punishment of its inhabitants. It literally burned so badly, it was never rebuilt.
  • Like
Reactions: tonychanyt
Upvote 0

NY Congressman Put GF and Daughter of Fiancee (not GF) on Payroll



Mr. D’Esposito’s hiring decisions since he won a seat in Congress in 2022 have been audacious — and in two cases may have transgressed ethics rules designed to combat nepotism and corruption.

Shortly after taking the oath of office, the first-term congressman hired his longtime fiancée’s daughter to work as a special assistant in his district office, eventually bumping her salary to about $3,800 a month, payroll records show.

In April, Mr. D’Esposito added someone even closer to him to his payroll: a woman with whom he was having an affair, according to four people familiar with the relationship. The woman, Devin Faas, collected $2,000 a month for a part-time job in the same district office.​

I started studying the bible seriously and after years I'm getting anxiety

Hi everyone, I gave my life to Christ a couple years ago and he's slowly transformed me to the man I am today. I've been progressing little by little but to give an overview of the efforts I've put so far go as follows. I read every night, I pray and meditate on his word daily. I go to church every Sunday where I always feel replenished after going. I've come to realize over time that I did not put the same effort of studying as I do in other aspects of my life. I recently just started studying more intensely to get a better understanding of God's teaching for us that he gives us access to through the Bible. I have been anxious free for years, until recently now that I've taken this next step to further my relationship with the Lord. I read in the mornings now, and now I'm taking notes. I cleaned up the things I have watched and watch more that teach me more about Jesus. This anxiety is small but I am very conscious that this is not from God. Is there an explanation for this? I always pray that God leads me and shows me what he needs to me to see and pray for access to the wisdom of what I read.

Thanks for all the help and bless you all!
Removing triggers to sin thoughts helps to a degree.

I recommend to read Philippians Chapter 4 about a replacement discipline to develop instead of anxiety.

I also recommend to read Romans Chapter 7 for more details about the source of the anxiety.

I hope that helps.
Upvote 0

Covenant theology

it’s too all-over-the-place. you can have differing dogmatic views in the same parish, and some denominations think that is a good thing.
I know! I think us protestants threw away some of the baby with the bathwater ( of course you would say "some of the baby, you think?", LOL...
Being non Orthodox or Catholic leaves me be confused as to what part is what. At this point I love finding it ok with you all. I have found that with covenant theology.. Because we prots have made and become somewhat a mess.
  • Like
Reactions: ArmyMatt
Upvote 0

Did 1 Thessalonians 2:16 allude to the destruction of Jerusalem?

1Th 1:

8 For not only has the word of the Lord sounded forth from you in Macedonia and Achaia, but your faith in God has gone forth everywhere, so that we need not say anything. 9 For they themselves report concerning us the kind of reception we had among you, and how you turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God, 10 and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come.
The wrath of God often referred to the final judgment of God. Here the context was the second coming of Jesus.

ESV, 1 Thessalonians 2:

14 For you, brothers, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea. For you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, 15 who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out,
Jews persecuted Jewish Christians.

and displease God and oppose all mankind 16 by hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved—so as always to fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them at last!"
Verb - Aorist Indicative Active - 3rd Person Singular
It wasn't the perfect tense.

When Paul wrote this, the destruction of Jerusalem had not happened.

What kind of wrath was Paul talking about? The destruction of the temple?

From this context, the 'wrath' could refer to the immediate spiritual rejection of the wrongful Jews. Paul pointed out the serious consequences of opposition to God’s message. However, it did not exclude the eventual fulfillment of judgment that culminated in the destruction of Jerusalem.

1Th 5:

1 Now concerning the times and the seasons, brothers, you have no need to have anything written to you. 2 For you yourselves are fully aware that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night.
Again, the context was the second coming.

9 For God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 10 who died for us so that whether we are awake or asleep we might live with him.
The word 'wrath' appeared three times in the epistle of 1 Thessalonians. Two times, the context was the second coming. The word 'temple' never even appeared in the entire epistle. It is unlikely that Paul had the temple's destruction in mind when he used the word 'wrath' in 1Th 2:16.

Did 1 Thessalonians 2:16 allude to the destruction of Jerusalem?

It might, but I doubt it.

What's considered an appropriate penitential substitute if a US Catholic accepts the USCCB's indult for Friday abstention?

Christ promised he will return and the gates of hell won't prevail. I trust in him.
Yes the Church will endure. There is no such promise to the United States. The Holy See is in Rome, but the Roman Empire still fell. The Church remains
Upvote 0

Ohio Sheriff: "Write Down All the Addresses" of Harris Supporters, Calls Illegal Immigrants "Locusts"

It's an idiom.
This is just terminology, but no, calling people vermin/locusts/etc isn't using an idiom.
Idiom is:
1: an expression in the usage of a language that is peculiar to itself either in having a meaning that cannot be derived from the conjoined meanings of its elements (such as up in the air for "undecided") or in its grammatically atypical use of words (such as give way)

2
a : the language peculiar to a people or to a district, community, or class : dialect

b: the syntactical, grammatical, or structural form peculiar to a language



3: a style or form of artistic expression that is characteristic of an individual, a period or movement, or a medium or instrument
the modern jazz idiom


broadly : manner, style
a new culinary idiom
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Pope Francis Names New Consultors to Vatican’s DDF, Including Controversial Theologian Father Maurizio Chiodi

Pope Francis has named 28 new consultors to the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, including moral theologian Father Maurizio Chiodi, who has expressed opinions contrary to Church teaching.

Chiodi, a moral theologian, has come under media scrutiny in recent years for suggesting contraception use in marriagecould be morally permissible in some circumstances.

In a 2017 lecture in Rome, the priest also said that homosexual relationships “under certain conditions” could be “the most fruitful way” for those with same-sex attraction “to enjoy good relations.”

Continued below.

Every Catholic Needs to Know About This Little-Known Eucharistic Doctrine

‘Concomitance,’ as St. Thomas Aquinas explains it, means that ‘nothing is lost by the body being received by the people without the blood.’

This summer, I got to celebrate Holy Mass in the Brooklyn parish where I stay when I’m home from my assignment as the academic dean of the Pontifical North American College in Rome. It is always a joy to offer Mass for a parish community. For me, it is a homecoming.

This parish is a multi-ethnic one in my diocese with a pastor born in Pakistan, an Urdu Mass, growing Haitian and Hispanic communities, and many other people, most of them longtime residents of this area of Brooklyn. It has in many ways become a welcoming oasis for me, a true family, and a place of rest and prayer. Named after the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I feel her motherly protection and presence — never more so than this summer when I offered my own mother’s funeral Mass in this parish.

One of the things that the parishioners of this parish have told me over my many years of association with it is that they truly appreciate homilies that teach them about the faith. These are parishioners who tell me that they are yearning for content and catechesis. They have mentioned that, as much as they appreciate nice stories about nice people being nice to others (basically what Bishop Robert Barron has described as “beige Catholicism,” which is its own brand of Moralistic Therapeutic Deism), what they want most of all is to learn about the faith — its contents, its practices and tradition, and how best to live this faith out in the world today.

Continued below.

Unprecedented attacks: IDF bombs over 300 Hezbollah targets in hours-long waves of airstrikes

We are pledged to help Israel defend itself.
Netanyahu has already gone far beyond that mission in his scorched earth Gaza genocide.
And now he is the aggressor, attacking Lebanon over and over--instead of pursuing diplomacy.
Israel is no longer "defending" itself. It is time for us to stop financing these aggressive campaigns and return to our original pledge.
Help Israel if it needs defense.
Tell Netanyahu when he attacks it's on his dime.
Diplomacy was tried over and over and over and over. Diplomacy only works if BOTH parties want peace which is NOT the case here when Hamas and Hezbollah hate and want to kill Jews...
Upvote 0

Operation Rescue: Withdrawing Support For Trump Would Be Political Suicide For The Pro-Life Movement

Are you referring to the aborted babies in heaven? I'm sure they can intercede for us. I think we ultimately leave it to the mercy of God.
I wasn't referring to them, but there is that, more intercessors.
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

‘Better Off Dead?’ documentary sharpens suicide prevention focus

Liz Carr
English actress and international disability rights activist Liz Carr, who produced and stars in the 2024 BBC documentary "Better Off Dead?", speaks in the U.S. Congress on Sept. 18, 2024. | Credit: Ken Oliver-Méndez/CNA

Last week, the first screening in the U.S. of the BBC documentary “Better Off Dead?” took place in the United States Congress.

Produced by British actress and renowned disability rights advocate Liz Carr, the film shows from a secular perspective how assisted-suicide laws around the world threaten the lives of individuals with disabilities.

Carr, who is not religious, told CNA that for many people, the absence of nonreligious arguments against assisted suicide has disadvantaged the cause.

Continued below.

Democrats Double and Triple Down on Abortion

I can never understand that mentality. Makes no sense to me. :(
It is as if a murderous spirit of death has spread across our land ... like an uncontrollable cancer ... and only God can stop it.
Upvote 0

Eschatology: The "Left Behind" narrative is unbiblical

The Christians living in Philadelphia when St. John wrote the Apocalypse, to whom this is being said, are no longer around. How can you simply ignore the context and declare this "is about the future" when it is clearly written to people two thousand years ago and is being said to them explicitly?

There is no exegesis being done to make this claim. It requires making things up that are not in Bible at all.

-CryptoLutheran
The Christians living in Philadelphia when St. John wrote the Apocalypse, to whom this is being said, are no longer around. How can you simply ignore the context and declare this "is about the future" when it is clearly written to people two thousand years ago and is being said to them explicitly?

There is no exegesis being done to make this claim. It requires making things up that are not in Bible at all.

-CryptoLutheran
Rev 3:10 is about the future 7-year Trib. Rev 4:1 is wholly in the future. Rev 22:8 proves John never left the island of Patmos because one angel showed John everything he heard and saw in his entire vision of Revelation. Please read Rev 22:8.

Therefore, John merely wrote about Rev 4:1 and heard and saw everything about it in his vision.

1 Th 1:10 (ESV): and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come

The Trib is a future event which starts with Rev 6:1-2. The wrath of God, in the Trib, begins no later than Rev 6:4 regarding “wars” that will suddenly break out all over the world.

God’s wrath is well-defined in Ezekiel 14:21 (NLT): “Now this is what the Sovereign Lord says: How terrible it will be when all four of these dreadful punishments fall upon Jerusalem—war, famine, wild animals, and disease—destroying all her people and animals.

Here’s Rev 6:4 (NLT): Then another horse appeared, a red one. Its rider was given a mighty sword and the authority to take peace from the earth. And there was war and slaughter everywhere.

Rev 6:4 is about the 2nd seal. It will feature one of the four most dreadful forms of God’s wrath: wars. Wars in the 2nd seal will occur all over the world simultaneously. It’s truly Hell on Earth. Many inhabitants of Earth will be killed.

So, we know that God’s wrath will come in the 2nd seal. That satisfies the requirement for God’s wrath at the beginning of the Trib, for the purposes of 1 Th 1:10.

“Delivers us” in 1 Th 1:10 relates to the second usage of “deliverance,” in the Bible. That second usage translates to “snatch away.” Therefore, that verse is about our being “snatched away" just before God’s wrath comes in the Trib. We know from Rev 6:4 that God’s wrath will come in the 2nd seal.

1 Th 1:10 is the first verse Apostle Paul wrote about the pre-Trib rapture. We will be raptured (snatched away) from Earth immediately prior to the Trib due to God’s wrath about to come in the 2nd seal.

That is what Jesus means in Rev 3:10. He will keep us from “the hour of trial.” We believers will not enter the 7-year Trib.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,746
Messages
65,438,023
Members
276,448
Latest member
Simple Dan