We spent months discussing how hard it is to work granite and how prestigious granite vases were and now you want to disavow granite as the "bestest material" to show your wealth? SMH.
No I don't want to disvow its special status as a material that lasts and is obviously the best available to work with if you want quality. I am disagreeing with your assumption that this was the only reason.
Who said anything about magnetic moments? You clearly don't understand the things you bring up. That is a good clue to STOP.
Why, I am simply pointing out the other issue that was discussed on this thread. That I discussed. You forget I am talking to 3 or 4 others and have to keep track. I was merely clarifying which is good. It actually ensures the right topic. You only have one issue to be concerned about. I have several.
You use batteries still in their packaging? I always remove my AAs before putting them in the TV remote.
Obviously lol.
The typical Li cells in EV batteries are about twice the voltage of a AA. Link 3 in serial to get the same voltage as a Li cell. (And this works perfectly fine. My remote is wired serially to get 3.0 V.) Then a whole bunch in parallel to get the power (typical current is 5-700 mA in a AA) needed to run the car.
Thanks for the lesson on batteries lol.
And here was my point: a jumble of batteries in the trunk is not a circuit, just as a random jumble of crystals will not build a power source either. Granite is not a piezoelectric power source.
So I asked Ai exactly your claim but in reverse (is Granite is a piezoelectric power source) and this was the return.
Yes, granite can be a piezoelectric power source because it contains quartz, which exhibits piezoelectric properties. When subjected to mechanical stress, granite can generate an electric charge. This phenomenon can be used to harvest energy from natural forces like seismic activity or from man-made pressure and vibrations.
What your not acknowledging is that these random jumbled up crystals can be brought into harmony with certain conditions. The papers I linked mention this. Such as acoustics or an electrical charge onto the pyramid.
Harnessing geothermal and piezoelectric properties of stone for sustainable electricity generation
Abstract
This study introduces a novel hybrid system in which piezoelectric and geothermal properties are integrated into basalt and quartz stones to generate green electricity. The same is satisfied by the energy conversion capability, high thermal holding capacity, and the strong piezoelectricity of quartz.
This study introduces a novel hybrid system in which piezoelectric and geothermal properties are integrated into basalt and quartz stones to generate green electricity. The same is satisfied by the energy conversion capability, high thermal holding capacity, and the strong piezoelectricity of...
www.nature.com
When Quartz is squeezed directly, mechanical stress leads to an electric charge, while inversely, an applied electric field causes the material to generate mechanical vibrations. This creates the opportunity for energy harvesting,
It’s On: What do the Fraser River and the Great Pyramid Have In Common? - Science World
The geography lesson was for a purpose. You've gone off on some nonsense about underlying rock types being conducting or some thing, when the location of transport, materials, and workers on a site with a firm, shallow bedrock is available.
I was speaking of the global location. Not within that location. The global and local environments and conditions each have their own independent effects. The glocal effect is associated with the pyramids being globally located where the electromagnetic waves are.
The generation of electricity requires the pyramid to vibrate always. Hence the location at which the electromagnetic waves are more on the surface of the globe are chosen to be the perfect sites for the pyramid. The pyramid at Giza is standing on the underwater currents of the river Nile plus on a location where high electromagnetic flux lines can be measured and felt. This provides the vibrations required for the crystals to vibrate at all times.
The Overall Science behind the Pyramid - written by K. S. Vishwanath Vashisht published on 2016/11/03 download full article with reference data and citations
www.ijert.org
I don't know. I don't listen to me.
I said 'what did others say'. Surely you listen to others.
You are literally invoking technology that no known ancient civilization had or described. The burden of proof is on those presenting the outrageous claims. I am rejecting them until actual evidence is provided. (It has not been.)
So what about the images and testimony under oath. Lying is a serious offense. This is the other kind of evidence which is experiencial in nature. Someone is giving an eye witness testimony. Either they are making it up, deluded or its real. When you get severak very dredible eye witnesses it gives weight to the experiencial evidence. When the belief persists after interegation and analysis then its a qualified belief.
Sometimes eye witness testimony makes the difference in a case. Its treated seriously enough to be a line of evidence in the legal system. It is the basis of Christ and the bible which has stood the test of time. Tests have been done that show the same brain patterns for real events are utilised in their experiences and not coming for the dream or imagination or emotional area of the brain.
I don't think we should underestimate experiencial evidence. Then you start to have to undermine the sanity of good people and start creating conspiracies just to discredit them. Without a shred of evidence.
No one thinks you *are* Hancock. Hancock can at least write.
Oh gee thanks. That makes me a bad Hancock who can't write.
We are aware you have not directly invoked Hancock or the most outrageous of his fantasies, but AS WE HAVE SAID MANY TIMES you continuously quote people who *do* follow Hancock and promote his claims.
Show me which ones and the words coming out of their mouth that they are supporting some unreal conspiracy about aliens or Atlantis.
Also I wish to correct a fallacy thats being snuck in here. That suggesting there might to a real even that sparked the Atlantis legend is not a conspiracy in itself. This is the bait and switch tactic. Falsely make out that if someone mentions the legand of Atlantis and how it may have come about through the sciences is making a conspiract theory.
This is false and even mainstream science has had an interest is discovering if there is any truth to legends. Often they find there was a real event that led to the creation of the legend. Like the Flood myths are based on real flood events and not some complete fairy tale. So you are making a conflation of the real science and myths yourself.
What we have been trying to do (for months, sigh) is to get you to look into your actual sources and what *they* invoke or believe in. It only took me 30 minutes of digging in the channel that created the video in the OP to sort out that the presenter of that video was a Hancock fan, if not an acolyte.
Oooh a Hancock fan, Take him to the dungeon. You really need to get over this Hancock derangement syndrome lol. You have brought this in dozens of times. Your not making me see anything. I am completely aware that some of these sites include stuff from Hancock and others. Its bound too as they all come under 'alternative knowledge and tech'. Like the UAP's this is a natural human intuition and belief. We have been doing it forever lol and never will stop. Because there is something real beyond that we are trying to get at. Its in our DNA so to speak.
But look at the specific people involved. The host of UnchartedX clearly states he is not promoting woo or conspiracy. But supporting what is said with evidence.
The guy from the OP clearly states he is treating the investigation academically. Your fixating on this so much that any suggestion or link to Hancok alone wipes out a persons credibility before you even find out what they believe themselves. Its classic ad hominem.
Like I said show me the words coming out of the people specifically that they are promoting some unreal idea or not supporting what they actually say with at least an attempt at the science. I mean re the signatures they say they don't know. They say its not modern machines or aliens. They just don't know.
When they do attempt to explain how its usually by some logical method like a lathe or some way of generating power through hydro or tapping into some form of energy they discovered. Which is certainly not aliens or far fetchs myths and a possibility. We just discovered they created some modern form of cement that looks like the real thing and lasts 5,000 plus years. So why not.
The "ancient advanced civilization" is the pseudoscience grift that Hancock has been pushing for 30+ years. Most of this not original to Hancock but has origins in earlier fools, morons, and grifters.
Fair enough.
Stick to the science, but use better epistemics.
Thats what I am doing. Like I said you have mentions Hancock and Atlantis and conspiracies more than a conspiracy theorist lol. Enough so to actually create one in this thread.