• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Trump threatens to cut Calif.’s federal funds if trans athletes ‘illegally’ compete in women’s events

This was in a school. And the guy wasn't trans. This isn't anything to do with the matter at hand which is transwomen, presenting themselves as women, wanting others to accept them as women, indistinguishable from other women who'd be using the restroom in a public space.

Again, if this was in your local bar, what would you want done. Have someone on the door checking genitalia? Making sure that a man isn't pretending to be a woman in order to gain entry and sexually assault someone?

Wasn't this just discussed? Wasn't it just suggested that this would be a monstrously stupid thing to do? Because we have laws against that already? And it would be a complete invasion of everyone's privacy? But hang on, maybe you don't think it's that stupid. Who knows. All I know is that at some point you're going to again say 'A man shouldn't be in a woman's restroom!'
Of course I don’t want anyone to check genitalia.

Maybe im too traditional that I will never accept trans women as real women, because I find it impossible. Maybe im too old fashioned.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this issue and move on.

Take care
Upvote 0

Communism- Socialism

Are you okay with America becoming a Communist and or Socialist country? Yes or No? And why?

Firstly, Communism and Socialism aren't the same thing.

Communist? No. Socialist? What kind of socialism? What implementation of socialist policies do you have in mind?

I think the US would benefit greatly with some implementation of some socialist policies which aim to produce just and equitable conditions in which people are given opportunity to thrive.

What I don't like is oligarchy, plutocracy, and authoritarianism.

What I do like is democracy, republican values of citizen participation in government, human liberty, and just conditions for human thriving.

Personally, I reject both Capitalism and Communism.

-CryptoLutheran
  • Like
Reactions: Fervent
Upvote 0

Midrash "Korach" (Numbers 16:1-18:32) "Don't rebel against God" (You won't win)

PARASHA: “Korach” (Korah) NUMBERS 16:1-18:32

This study is about a Levite named “Korah” and a few of his friends, Dathan and Abiram, and they got together with 250 other guys and they “Rose up in the face of Moses”. Now, this is certainly not a friendly gathering; they did not come to Moshe to say, “Yo Moe, Wuz Up?” No, it was a rebellion! Pride and arrogance had filled the hearts of these men, and now they questioned Moshe’s authority.

We can’t seem to understand why, after Moshe led them through the wilderness, went up Mt. Sinai, received the commandments, interceded for the whole people on various occasions so that God would not destroy them, now want to question Moshe’s leadership calling. I guess we can call it just that, “blind arrogance and the will to do their own thing.” They came against Aaron and Moshe with the following words;

“Ye take too much upon you, seeing all the congregation are holy, every one of them, and YHVH is among them; wherefore then lift ye up yourselves above the assembly of YHVH?” (16:3)

The words “congregation” and “assembly” are one in the same in the Hebrew language: “Kahal” (Qof, Hey, Lamed) “behold there is holiness in instruction” That is what every single congregation should be all about, be the congregation a Sunday honoring church or a Sabbath honoring Messianic Synagogue, we are all ONE body in MESSIAH YESHUA, dedicated to receive instruction from the Torah through Adonai’s chosen vessels.

“Holiness” or “Kodesh” means we are “separated” unto God by our lifestyles and through our acceptance of Yeshua as our LORD and Savior. Studying the Word of God and applying it to our lives increases our maturity in the faith.

Now, here’s a question: was Korah right by saying that “all the congregation are holy, and that YHVH was with them?” Yes, he was right!

“You shall be unto me a holy nation and a kingdom of priests” (Exodus 19:5). There was nothing wrong with that statement, because it is a TRUE statement. Today, every born-again believer is a “priest”; we have access to the Throne of Grace, just like the priests of old went before the people in the Tabernacle and later on, in the Holy Temple to make intercession before YHVH.

Through Yeshua, we have intercession before a Holy God. What was WRONG was that they questioned Aaron and Moshe’s authority by saying, “Wherefore lift ye up yourselves above the Kahal of YHVH?”

The truth is that they did NOT lift themselves up over the “Kahal Yisrael,” it was ADONAI who lifted THEM UP! It was YHVH who ordained them as leaders to lead the flock of Israel. In every organization, there has to be a leader or leaders. In every business, there is an owner, president, a manager, assistant managers, shift leaders, and the workers. All of them have “value,” yet they need to be led by leaders, or the business will topple over, and the workers scatter like sheep without a shepherd. In the church/synagogue setting, there has to be a pastor or rabbi, assistant pastor, and associate rabbi or rabbis, then, we have the Sunday School teachers, Torah teachers, youth workers, children’s ministry, music and worship leaders and assistants, secretaries, finance officers, etc.

ALL have MUCH VALUE in ministry, for that reason, we are given the spiritual gifts to make the Body of Messiah work and run like a well-oiled machine. YET, when rebels come and want to disrupt the congregation, disaster can happen, and that is what the enemy “HaSatan” wants, yet before that happened, YHVH had to step in and deal with the situation at hand. In all, we have 250 plus Korah, Dathan, and Abiram who are causing the rebellion. A rebellion that could have spread to a few million Kahal members, “Kol HaKahal Yisrael” (to ALL the congregation of Israel).

YHVH has them bring their censers and put incense and fire in them and bring them before the Mishkan. YHVH will settle the matter once and for all. Remember that the censor, incense, and fire symbolize our prayers that ascend to Adonai. Moshe, in a way, is saying, “LORD, YOU decide who you want to lead, and be high priest!”

Adonai answered in a very frightening way. But before that, Moshe pointed out to Korah that he was already appointed to serve in the tabernacle, intercede before the people, yet, Korah was not satisfied; he wanted even MORE, to be a priest, and perhaps even “High Priest”.

Korah’s defiance led to a rebellion, and the rebellion led to destruction. Not only the destruction of Korah, but also of those who followed him. In Hebrew, the words “Korach,” which symbolizes “Rebellion,” and “Sh’dad,” which means “destruction,” are related because they both have the same numeric value in Hebrew gematria, 308. Korah’s rebellion led to destruction.

As we read on, the “earth opened up” and swallowed up Korah and his household. HOWEVER, God did not punish the righteous members of Korah’s family. Remember that the “Sons of Korah” wrote some of the Psalms. He had some sons who were against their father’s rebellion, and they were saved. Just as we remember the plea of Abraham concerning Sodom and Gomorra, “Far be it that YHVH should destroy the righteous with the wicked” so Adonai sent an Angel to take Lot and his family out of Sodom, but just as Lot’s sons-in-law and his wife perished, saving only Lot and his two daughters, some of the sons of Korah were saved, and the rest of the family went down into Sheol.

Then we see that Adonai wipes out all the 250 rebels, cleans the slate! No more rebels, may that be a lesson for those who would want to challenge Adonai or his appointed ones. However, is there a time when God’s leaders can be challenged? I would say that if a leader or leaders are teaching lies, false doctrines, and leading the people AWAY from God, teaching that there are “many ways” to God, and that Yeshua is NOT enough, THEN…that leader needs to stop and think what he or she is doing, if others of the Kahal bring this to their attention, it should be done in a humble, respectful way, not in a rebellious way.

There are 7 steps in a rebellion: 1) Self-exaltation, 2) jealousy, 3) conspiring with others, 4) the use of cunning or deceitful words, 5) accusation, 6) division, 7) death and destruction. Satan followed these steps as the Prophet Isaiah writes in (Isaiah 14:12-15). As a result, he was kicked out of Heaven with one-third of the angelic hosts (now called demons).

Evil speech, slander, and deceit are known in Hebrew as "Leshon-Hara"; within these two words, there are two other words mixed in, which are "Evil" (ra) and "head" (rosh). In both cases, both Korah and Satan spoke evil against "The Head" or the "Supreme Leader" (Moses and God himself)
The Word of God teaches us to "be in subjection to those who God has put above us to lead us and guide us on this earth.

We must be reminded of what 1 Peter 2:13-15 says:” Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man, or unto governors. So is the will of God:” God has appointed them to lead us.

We ALL have a place in ministry, we are all vessels of VALUE. Yet all vessels have a maker, and that maker is Our LORD and God. And he always chooses a certain vessel or vessels to lead the others; we must all come under that leadership, lift up that leadership, uphold those hands of leadership through support and prayer. Who knows, maybe Adonai will choose YOU as an appointed leader!

Shavua Tov (Have a good Week)


"Yo Moe, Just who do you think you are?"
Korach.jpg

Communism- Socialism

Of course not. You can take that position as long as you accept the consequences. Everything has a price.
Sure, but megacorporations being given tax dollars to build is far more objectionable than tax dollars going to needy individuals, and if you're defending the megacorporations you're on the wrong side of things ethically.
The bible doesn’t absolve us from bad decisions. We must accept responsibility for our mistakes. But if you’ve spent enough time in proverbs you’d choose differently.
Sure, but the Bible isn't exacctly on the side of exploitative wealthy individuals. Might want to give Amos a read on that account.
What kind of nonsense is that? If someone wants to enrich their loved ones its no one‘s business. They don’t owe anyone an explanation or apology. People pass along money all the time. Everyone isn’t a spendthrift or living above their means or riddled with debt. Many live sensibly.

~bella
If your claim is about meritocracy by equating weath with talent, then generational wealth disproves your claim. Unless you think it takes talent to have a rich mom and dad.
Upvote 0

Never Ending Wonderfulness

I have found
By my own experience
The only time
I will ever become discouraged
Is when I doubt God.

I stopped doing that
When I realized
That was the only time
I ever got discouraged.

I never get discouraged anymore
Because I never doubt God anymore.
And I have found
That's the only reason why
I would ever have doubt
In God
Was because
That what I was doing
Was me
Instead of him.

So
If you never want to be discouraged
And you never want to have doubt
Never do anything
On your own
And make sure
It is him.
Upvote 0

Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

Science is the reason they go to atheism today.

Specifically evolution.
Wrong. Science is not the reason they go to atheism. It is the theory of evolution that is taught that they go to atheism.
The problem is that different people, even Christians such as myself, may have a different conceptualization about what truth is and how truth claims work and are even justified, especially where truth may reportedly lead us to, or be a manifestation of, actual knowledge.

This is where the intricacies and polysemous qualities of a truth come to a head and meet the road. And not everything that Evangelical or Fundamentalist Christians assert can be born out as evidentially true where words themselves are seen to have some sort of 'concrete' quality that they might not actually have. And that's where the problem lies.

Have you ever studied Wittgenstein?
I have not studied Wittgenstein.
When I tell the Gospel, I show the person that they have sinned against a righteous and holy God and that one day, they will have to give an account. Then those who are guilty will be condemned, and those who are not guilty will have everlasting life. But sadly, we are all guilty. So, we need Christ to take the punishment for our sins. He died in our place for our sins. And those who have put their trust/belief in Him are saved.
This is the truth, and it is loving to tell people. To not tell them the truth is to be unloving.
Many Christians will simply be friends with the non-believer in the hope that they will come to Christ. They choose not to tell them the hard stuff because they may lose the friendship. But if we do not tell them, then they will not believe.
that I rejected it right away
Sadly, this is why you dismiss creation. Because your view of science cannot allow for a cause that is not from naturalism. Right away, you were close-minded to any other view that could be outside of naturalism, even if it made sense.
Paul was referring to "bad uses," NOT philosophy on the whole. We need to get that straight through our thick skulls.
Colossians 2:8 is a clear warning. Not just against ‘bad philosophy,’ but against any system of thought rooted in man’s ideas rather than Christ. When Christians say it’s only about ‘bad uses’ of philosophy, they risk watering down Paul’s very point: to stay alert to teachings that sound wise but pull us away from the authority of God’s Word.
Evolution is one of the clearest modern examples of this. It presents a story of origins built on naturalism, not Christ, and asks us to reinterpret the plain reading of Genesis to make it fit. That’s not harmless philosophy; it’s ‘vain deceit’ by Paul’s own definition.
Jesus and the apostles treated Genesis as real history because they quoted from it and referred to its people and events as literal, historical realities, not parables or myths. If we start letting human theories shape how we read God’s Word, we’ve already started down the path Paul warned about.
So, it means deceptive philosophy. AV1611VET has used Col 2:8 in the correct manner. To say otherwise is, once again, watering down God's word. Sadly, once a person has watered down Genesis, they will be more willing to water down the rest of scripture to fit their ideology. And I am not saying this to get a dig in at you. I am saying it so that you may see your folly. Blessings.
Thank you for this suggestion. I recognise and applaud your intent in making it. I raise my hat to you.

However, in the context of this thread and my commitment to @Jerry N. to view the video and comment on it I am left appalled, astounded and aghast. I take my commitment to view the video to be done with the highest level of objectivity I can mount and with careful consideration of all the points raised. That requires multiple views and careful examination of each argument, each sentence, in some cases each word. To treat it in the cavalier mannner you describe would be fine for addressing uncontroversial points, or the typical YouTube dross. It is wholly out of place in the present context. I am troubled that you would consider this gimic a bona fide method for serious study.
That is up to you.
Nonsense. We (I generalise) don't care what your God, or any of the thousands of other Gods do or do not like. It is irrelevant to us. We care about what our own moral compass tells us is good and what is bad, what is right and what is wrong. My own compass is partially informed by the Sermon on the Mount, but I do not consider it to be the word of God, rather the thoughts of a compassionate and thoughful fellow human.
If morality is just a personal compass, then no action, no matter how horrific, can be objectively wrong. If there's no higher standard beyond human opinion, then even the Nazis’ atrocities were just "different values," not truly evil. That’s the danger of moral relativism: it removes any firm foundation for condemning injustice. Evolution may try to explain how we got morals, but it can't tell us why something is right or wrong. Without God, there’s no absolute standard, just preferences. And that’s not enough when real evil exists.
Upvote 0

Trump threatens to cut Calif.’s federal funds if trans athletes ‘illegally’ compete in women’s events

It has happened. Hunter Heckel of Virginia wore a skirt and sexually assaulted a girl in the bathroom. It occurred in 2021 when he was 15.
This was in a school. And the guy wasn't trans. This isn't anything to do with the matter at hand which is transwomen, presenting themselves as women, wanting others to accept them as women, indistinguishable from other women who'd be using the restroom in a public space.

Again, if this was in your local bar, what would you want done. Have someone on the door checking genitalia? Making sure that a man isn't pretending to be a woman in order to gain entry and sexually assault someone?

Wasn't this just discussed? Wasn't it just suggested that this would be a monstrously stupid thing to do? Because we have laws against that already? And it would be a complete invasion of everyone's privacy? But hang on, maybe you don't think it's that stupid. Who knows. All I know is that at some point you're going to again say 'A man shouldn't be in a woman's restroom!'
Upvote 0

If universalism is true then why did God send His Son to die for our sins?

Good grief … about what am I being disingenuous? Quote yourself back for me and point out how I misrepresented you?
Your post is such a mess that it is hard to understand who said what. The quote boxes are you not me.
Upvote 0

US has struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Trump says

Isaiah 66 8 Who has heard such a thing? Who has seen such things? Shall a land be born in one day? Shall a nation be brought forth in one moment? For as soon as Zion was in labor she brought forth her children.

God asked, can a nation be created in 1 day? Then He answered yes by establishing Israel in 1948.

This was prophesied by Ezekiel also. Ezekiel 36:19 I scattered them among the nations, and they were dispersed through the countries. In accordance with their ways and their deeds I judged them. - this happened in 70AD. Israel was scattered across the world, with no land, no army, no government. But let's take a look what God says in verse 24 'I will take you from the nations and gather you from all the countries and bring you into your own land.' And this indeed happened in may 1948.
We can then surely say that the modern Israel is the same Israel in OT.

The people of Israel are cut apart because God chose them to be His Holy, Exodus 19:6 and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words that you shall speak to the people of Israel.”

They are special for the sole reason that God has declared them to be special. They are the physical fulfilment of the extraordinary promese God made thousands of years ago to Abraham and his wife Sara.

It is for this reason Paul says in Romans 11: I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! For I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew.

Does that mean that Israel has a special spiritual deal with God by which the people have received unique path to salvation? Is justification by grace through faith only a new covenant deal or a simply a plan for gentiles? Absolutely not. Verse 7 What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was seeking. The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened.

Israel as people missed the close relationship they wanted with God by rejecting Jesus Christ when He was in their midst. Who received it instead? The elect, which consists both of gentiles and jews.

The hardening of Israel is not permanent. A time will come when the Jewish people are finally be ready to receive Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour. Verses 25-26
25 Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written,“The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”;

28 As regards the gospel, they are enemies for your sake. But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. 29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. 30 For just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy.

The church should celebrate Israel. That miraculous. born in a day state is a living testimony of the surety of God's promises and the suffering nature of His love. These people were chosen and miraculously birthed by God. There were great periods over the years during which people loved their Father and served Him with all their hearts. There were many more times which they did not. But whether in good times or in bad, God's love never wavered.

As I said, I'm not going to debate the theology of this subject here. But I did notice that you didn't actually answer the question I asked of you. I asked if you regard the modern state of Israel and the Jewish people to be the same thing.

-CryptoLutheran
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Should doctors be able to withold treatment for political affiliation or marital status?

If this were a true "safe space" for...whomever...there would be no opposite opinions allowed whatsoever.

You seemed to have a problem understanding "...no opposite opinions allowed whatsoever," so I repeated it.
And you seem to have a problem understanding that on some issues there are no opposite opinions allowed.
Upvote 0

The rise of Democratic Socialism

Because it was found that laissez-faire capitalism does not work, and forgive me if that isn't what you mean by "free market capitalism."
I don't know of anyone anymore that would advocate for that.

Complete laissez-faire never works.

We do need a system with SOME regulation. Including regulation to make sure the free market is actually free and not controlled by certain entities which restrict the free market.
Upvote 0

If universalism is true then why did God send His Son to die for our sins?

Why didn’t you quote my actual post? You are merely paraphrasing my post and adding commentary that I did not say. That is disingenuous.
Good grief … about what am I being disingenuous? Quote yourself back for me and point out how I misrepresented you?
Upvote 0

The rise of Democratic Socialism

They believe in free market capitalism except where some goods and services are delivered by the government or by private utilities, but where government remains effectively democratic.
Its rhe except part that is rhe problem. Because under rhe socialist ideal the except slowly morphs into most things where people are dependent upon it.

The government can claim democratic, but people once dependent always vote for dependence. And as long as the government doesn't turn evil, then people are to dependant and dont know how to act independent. Freedom and responsibility is sacrificed for security feom responsibility and lack of freedom of choices.
Upvote 0

Communism- Socialism

You identified yourself as a contract engineer. Any information you received was second-hand. I, on the other hand, was (and still am) the attorney for a small union and conducted the negotiations.

Of course our experiences do not match.

As an aside, there is something about the engineering profession that makes them tend toward a . . . well . . . "classical" view of economics and property. At least that is my experience over the years.
lol Have not changed much through the years have you? But is nice talking with you after all these years even when we are sometimes in different sides of the fence.

ETA: my contract with the company involved efficiency and systems so the information I received was first hand as it happened Because it affected my recommendations.
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Communism- Socialism

My experience does not match yours.
You identified yourself as a contract engineer. Any information you received was second-hand. I, on the other hand, was (and still am) the attorney for a small union and conducted the negotiations.

Of course our experiences do not match.

As an aside, there is something about the engineering profession that makes them tend toward a . . . well . . . "classical" view of economics and property. At least that is my experience over the years.
Upvote 0

If universalism is true then why did God send His Son to die for our sins?

But you are since you believe that salvation is possible after death.

Reply: No. I don’t “build” my theology around any “one” thing. My hope in Christ concerning UR, is based on an abundance of Scripture stating this beautiful truth. Which in turn is affirmed in my spirit by His Spirit.

There is no contradiction.

Reply: Refusal to acknowledge contradiction does not make it go away.

You still have not even addressed the verse I posted.

Reply: I’m not ignorant. I know how to read. What I am not is a mind reader. So … what is your question concerning your quoted passage? I affirm death and hades are thrown in to the LOF, which is the second death. Do you or do you not have a question surrounding this passage? Sheeesh …

Ok. I thought it was self explanatory. Here it is.

“Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭20‬:‭14‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
bible.com

Revelation 20:14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. | New American Standard Bible - NASB (NASB2020) | Download The Bible App Now

Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
bible.com
It is the second death.



One is regular death and the other is the second death for those not resurrected and those in hades which are the wicked and all in hades.

Reply: I’m sorry but you are not making any sense.

““And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: The first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life, says this: ‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the slander by those who say they are Jews, and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, so that you will be tested, and you will have tribulation for ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. The one who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who overcomes will not be hurt by the second death.’”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭2‬:‭8‬-‭11‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
bible.com

Revelation 2:8-11 “And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: T he first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life, says this: ‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the slander b | New American Standard Bible -

“And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: T he first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life, says this: ‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the slander b
bible.com
These are the believers that the devil will throw in prison for 10 days to be tested. If they overcome they will not be hurt. Nothing here about all.

Reply: You are simply all over the place my brother. Your house of cards is crumbling all around you. In a previous response of yours you asked “where does it say “hurt” instead of “killed.” Now you are quoting it?

Same thing. UR is not in scripture.

Reply: Ok.


You claim that most people will go into the LOF

Reply: No. Your theology places most people in eternal fire. Not mine … Are you confused about your position?

which is a fear monger it tactic delivered as an emotional fallacy to impart fear.

Reply: Again, I am merely reminding you of “your theological dilemma.” Like I said, live with it. It’s your reality.

However you have no way to quantify your statement.

Reply: Scratching head … which statement am I unable to quantify?

PS I’m going to leave you to it … I simply cannot follow your train of thought. I hope you find rest from your fear brother.

blessings

Last edited: Today at 5:49 PM
“You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men. “You are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven.- Our Lord and Savior.

LikeGiftQuoteReply
Report

Upvote0
Why didn’t you quote my actual post? You are merely paraphrasing my post and adding commentary that I did not say. That is disingenuous.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,870,893
Messages
65,289,595
Members
275,875
Latest member
LostLady24