Lindsey Halligan, and the dog that ate the transcript.
- American Politics
- 4 Replies
This DoJ nosedive will be consequential for victims of serious crimes, I think. In a bad way.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The Vatican’s doctrinal office said Tuesday the title of “Co-Redemptrix” is not an appropriate way to describe Mary’s participation in salvation.
In Mater Populi Fidelis (“The Mother of the Faithful People of God”), the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) said when an expression requires frequent explanation to maintain the correct meaning, it becomes unhelpful.
In addition to “Co-Redemptrix,” the document also addressed at length the Marian title “Mediatrix” or “Mediatrix of All Graces,” analyzing related Church teaching on Mary’s role as intercessor.
The DDF concluded that “some titles, such as ‘Mediatrix of All Graces,’ have limits that do not favor a correct understanding of Mary’s unique place.”
The dicastery encouraged the use of other expressions for Mary, specifically titles referring to her motherhood, including “Mother of God” and “Mother of the Faithful People of God.”
“She is the mother who gave the world the author of redemption and of grace, who stood firm at the foot of the cross (cf. John 19:25), suffering alongside her son and offering the pain of her maternal heart pierced by the sword (cf. Luke 2:35),” the document said. “From the Incarnation to the cross and the Resurrection, she was united to Christ in a way that is unique and that far surpasses any other believer.”
How would that jive with what I mentioned before regarding actions by other executive agencies like the IRS, EPA, or FDA?
For instance, when the EPA or FDA decides to do a "surprise pop-in" and start searching a private production facility for potential violations (not based on any existing evidence, but purely based on trying to find evidence), or the IRS requesting non-specific account information from banks about wide swaths of customers in one swoop so they can go fishing for reasons to audit?
Is it a case where people are willing to play a little fast and loose withe definition of "unreasonable" for the particular types of crimes they personally see as more egregious based on a "punching up vs. punching down" perspective?
By that I mean, a perspective of:
"going after an undocumented migrant who's just trying to make a couple of bucks" = "punching down...so, bad"
"going after a greedy corp like Pfizer or Dow Chemical, or some rich fat cat who may be cheating on his taxes" = "punching up...so, okay"
Pointing out a lack of integrity/character is not an "ad hominem" unless it is presented as an argument. it's just an observation about having a lack of principles.Here's a suggestion for you. Keep your petty personal comments about any given poster's character to yourself. I don't appreciate it and I know others don't.
Well you said for yourself Blanche got what he wanted. It's just a shame that what he went looking for wasn't the truth.So now given the released the Epstein emails that proves Ghisaline Maxwell lied to Deputy AG Todd Blanche about what she know (aka the point of the interview in telling Todd Blanche what he wanted to hear) are they going to send Maxwell back to the appropriate prison?
Looking to get a little more insight from multiple people from multiple backgrounds on this. Thank you in advance to anyone who responds.
-When you first became a Christian, what did you expect life in the church to be like?
-What were your hopes or assumptions about how things would go?
-What was your first experience with the church community?
-Did those expectations match reality, or were there surprises?
-How do you feel now about your place in the church?
That was not at issue. What was at issue was whether 615 people who were not subject to mandatory detention were actually subject to mandatory detention. They aren't, by definition. And whether others, who pose no safety risk, were eligible for bond. They are.Its not at all up to a judge to determine if a person is in violation of immigration law.
Initially the Christian movement was indeed called the way. These verses pertain to a charge of public menace against Paul brought to Felix, governor, by the priest Ananias.(CLV) Ac 24:14
"Yet I am avowing this to you, that, according to the way which they are terming a sect, thus am I offering divine service to the hereditary God, believing all that is written, according to the law and in the prophets,
(CLV) Ac 24:5
For, finding this man a pestilence and |stirrer of insurrections among all the Jews who are on the |inhabited earth, besides a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes,
These verses relate to Paul’s imprisonment in Rome. Paul appealed but the Jews objected to his release so he had to appeal to Cesar, not because he had a problem with Rome but because he has a problem with the Jews objecting. In verse 21 the Jews state that they had not received letters complaining about him from Judea but (verse 22) heard that others areas related to Jews were starting that sect that Paul was with was creating problems. Again, they word for sect here hairesis is where we gat the word heresy from. So again, another clear distinction between the “sect” of Paul and the Jews.(CLV) Ac 28:22
Now we count it worthwhile to hear from you what your disposition is. For, indeed, concerning this sect, it is known to us that everywhere it is being contradicted."
(CLV) Ac 28:23
Now setting a day for him, more came to him in the lodging, to whom he expounded, certifying to the kingdom of God, besides persuading them concerning Jesus, both from the law of Moses and the prophets, from morning till dusk.
lol The folly is yours. Here let me see you explain this verses.I won't continue in the folly of debunking what I have already debunked.
Oftentimes I see people argue scripture because they are passionate about trying to teach others but also they are not educated enough to teach.
So, what ultimately happens, is that the words of the bible are weaponized against the other person to end discussion and both part angry and, you guessed it, divided..
I wonder how things were many years ago when elders and pastors took the time to actually preach about the history of the bible, the context of the verses etc instead of skim the top of it and talk about love and joy in isolation.
Jesus, of course, is love and joy but how and why He got to this point is important to people or there wouldn't be so many arguments about what He does/doesn't mean.
Additionally, there are some people who didn't even know that Paul wasn't introduced to Jesus until after He rose! They believe the comments of Paul to the churches are actually words from Jesus to us?
Education is lacking and I really do blame the churches for this but I do wonder how long this has been the case.
Indeed it is.That's corn and not soybeans isn't it?
The tip-off was when he started resorting to facts.It's obvious that you have an anti Trump bias.
Is there an Amendment to the Constitution which allows a third term if the candidate is the alleged messiah?
Gentiles came to a point, after being invited to rejoin their lost House headed by Jewish Christians (the original Christians), and applied church appropriation, a makeover, then rejection of the founders, much in the way colonization did to indigenous peoples. It's the human way, not God's. Of course, the Jews also rejected the original Jewish Christians so they got it from all sides. Even today all seek to serve self rather than God's plan.
Twenty years on the internet,- including trans social media, a decade more obsessively studying history, and the ability to identify patterns.Why would you least suspect this person? Perversion knows no bounds.
Surely Bannon knows that Trump can pardon him and others from future prosecution for past crimes, the way Joe Biden did for his son Hunte
"As God is my witness, if we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included. They're not going to stop."
![]()
‘Some in This Room Are Going to Prison – Myself Included’: Bannon Predicts Grim Fate for Himself If Democrats Win Upcoming Elections
Steve Bannon told a hall full of conservatives that if Democrats win the 2026 midterm elections and the presidency in 2028, some of them will go to prison, including him.www.yahoo.com
The last time, he defrauded Trump's followers, but Trump pardoned him. No pardons this time. And now he's facing the reality.
There is a theme I am sensing. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Both sides have legitimate and political prosecutions. We are seeing both. It will flip back to the GOP being prosecuted. It seems like it is God's plan to rid government of corruption. We might go back and forth until the voters can learn to pick leaders of good character that are not self-serving.
The GOP will lose because the economy is failing and Trump's policies have hurt major groups of voters such as SNAP and Obama recipients, federal employees, farmers and ranchers, and everyone who hurts from tariffs. Not too mention certain immigrant groups. 2000 rebates or other vote buying will not be enough. I have said before: Why did God never target Obama or Biden with all the unfortunate stuff? Because God judges the church and not nations is my answer I settled on. Many in the church entered politics and compromised their mission and character. We failed because humility always comes before restoration and renewal. No one represents the love of money more than Trump and many Christians have bought into that. Can you see change coming? It will better.
Depends on how one defines the characteristics and teachings of a modern day Pharisee. I would define them as religious, powerful, political, influential, legalist, tradition driven, self righteous and most of all hypocritical. Fortunately, none of these characteristics describe a Christian. That said, why would one come even close to trying your patience and faith?The archtypical Pharisee is everywhere around us. It’s interesting that Christ did spend a good part of his ministry exposing these people, explaining their doom. And just like Abraham said, if they do not believe the words of Moses, neither will they believe if one rises from the dead.
They’re good at trying one’s patience and faith. Is that the only reason why they’re here?
Most Baptists I know are pretty good Christians, and personal experience is that they do follow Jesus' teachings.There are baptist churches, but no such thing as the Baptist Church. I have never come across a baptist church that is only interested in getting people saved. That's important, but once saved, it is important that the church members care for one another.