• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Be Instructed Judah

The rejoining of Judah; just a remnant, and the Christian Israelites, Galatians 6:14-16, will happen soon after the Sixth Seal world changer
Christians were never the northern kingdom. The northern kingdom went into Assyrian captivity, because they had gotten into idol worship.

Do an online search for a map of divided Israel - made up of the northern kingdom and southern kingdom. Modern day Israel covers the land mass of both the northern kingdom and southern kingdom. The reuniting into one nation again has been fulfilled.

Ezekiel 37:15-28 proves your theory of a solar flare wipeout of current Israel and a replacement nation of Christians called Beulah in error.
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

Consider me warned.
ok
Fortunately evolution doesn't concern itself with how well we justify something. It couldn't care less. Ask Hitler how that eugenics thing worked out.
Sure, but rape imiproves fitness. Is rape moral?
Upvote 0

The Schumer Shutdown

Schumer offers plan to end government shutdown:
  • Proposes that Democrats would vote to reopen the government if the funding measure (a continuing resolution or appropriations bill) included a one-year extension of the tax credits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that help lower insurance premiums.
  • Proposes the creation of a bipartisan committee to negotiate longer-term healthcare reform (particularly on the ACA subsidies) after the government re-opens—thus splitting the matters into (a) re-open government now and (b) deal with broader policy later.
  • Frames the one-year extension not as a policy change but as extending current law for a year (thus his term “just say yes”) to give working families certainty.
  • Schumer argues this approach respects the Republican position that healthcare policy negotiations should not be entangled in re-opening. (He tried to structure the proposal so re-opening and extension happen simultaneously, then policy talk follows.)
Of course. Extend tax credits to avoid impact on mid-terms.

The enhanced ACA subsidies have substantially lowered premiums for middle-income earners and eliminated the “subsidy cliff.” If these lapse in 2025, roughly 14 million people could see premium hikes averaging hundreds of dollars per month. That would dominate headlines in 2026—right when Democrats are defending a difficult Senate map. By proposing the one-year extension now, Schumer casts Democrats as protecting families’ pocketbooks while Republicans “hold the government hostage”—an election-year framing advantage.
Upvote 0

Are professed Christians that worship our Lord on Sunday instead of Saturday sinning?

That's not true. I responded to that post in post 250.

Let's not make this personal.
Not making anything personal. This is just a conversation between professed Christians.

In your post 250 you did not address the verses that I posted but simply added your own. In fact you only quoted one sentence of my posts.
In that same book John says that if you do inadvertently sin, to get right back on the path.

How would you apply that verse to this verse, regarding willfully breaking the Sabbath?:
You can’t break what no longer applies. The sabbath is not required of the Christian. Our rest is in Jesus.
(CLV) Hb 10:26
For at our sinning voluntarily after obtaining the recognition of the truth, it is not longer leaving a sacrifice concerned with sins,

(CLV) Hb 10:27
but a certain fearful waiting for judging and fiery jealousy, about to be eating the hostile.
“But we are not among those who shrink back to destruction, but of those who have faith for the safekeeping of the soul.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭10‬:‭39‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Sinning willfully would amount to rejection of the Holy Spirit since it is He who convicts not the law.
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

Oh, there's a standard for how close a supermarket should've for every citizen in the city? Who created rhis standard? I know a LOT of Middle income people who aren't a mile from a grocery store.
Seems the USDA is ahead of you here - they apparently call them "low access" areas now. Personally, I don't care what you call them - I call them food deserts because that's the terminology I'm familiar with, not out of any desire to influence anyone.

Upvote 0

Are professed Christians that worship our Lord on Sunday instead of Saturday sinning?

Agreed, most of the people in the mob were Jews. Most of the followers of Jesus were Jews. Most of the indifferent bystanders were Jews. Most of the people in all the gospel stories were Jews (with the notable exception of the Romans, who did the actual crucifying).

My only objection here is to the claim that "the majority of the Jews voted to have Jesus crucified". I don't see that supported in the gospel stories.
The Jewish religious leaders were responsible for bringing Christ to the Romans and accusing Him of capital crimes. The mob was given the choice of who to execute and they chose Jesus. This had the same effect as Israel in general rejecting the messiah. Jesus grieving and lamentation for Jerusalem in Matt. 23 is a case in point.
.
Upvote 0

Are professed Christians that worship our Lord on Sunday instead of Saturday sinning?

I have and you ignored it. Post 246
That's not true. I responded to that post in post 250.

Let's not make this personal.

“If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous, so that He will forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us.”
‭‭1 John‬ ‭1‬:‭8‬-‭10‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
In that same book John says that if we do inadvertently sin, to get right back on the path.

How would you apply that verse to this verse, regarding willfully breaking the Sabbath?:


(CLV) Hb 10:26
For at our sinning voluntarily after obtaining the recognition of the truth, it is not longer leaving a sacrifice concerned with sins,

(CLV) Hb 10:27
but a certain fearful waiting for judging and fiery jealousy, about to be eating the hostile.
Upvote 0

Be Instructed Judah

Modern day Israel covers the land mass of the former southern kingdom and the former northern kingdom.

When do you think Ezekiel 37:15-28, the reuniting of the former two nations back into one nation will be fulfilled ?
The Jewish State of Israel is just a small fraction of the Holy Land, all that area given to Abraham and his descendants. Genesis 15:18
Gods faithful peoples have never yet occupied all of the Holy Land. They will - before Jesus Returns, He will save them by winning the battle of Armageddon. Revelation 19:11-21

The rejoining of Judah; just a remnant, and the Christian Israelites, Galatians 6:14-16, will happen soon after the Sixth Seal world changer.
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

Michelle Obama tried giving these hungry children healthy food. They just threw it in the trash.
It takes time to change habits. And I recall the vitriol and hatred spewed at her by conservatives (on this very forum, no less) for daring to dictate what children should be eating. Funny how that changes once it's conservatives who want to tell people what to eat.
  • Winner
Reactions: Innsmuthbride
Upvote 0

The Schumer Shutdown

Trump could end the shutdown tomorrow. Such poor leadership is tragic.
Yes, he could succumb to blackmail by a minority, have the bill changed and force the House and Senate to pass the new bill.

Schumer could simply vote to continue the government. Democrats want to use blackmail to change legislation.
Upvote 0

Are professed Christians that worship our Lord on Sunday instead of Saturday sinning?

It wasn’t called Palestine until Hadrian renamed the province of Judea to Syria Palestinia in 135 CE after the Bar Kockba revolt, an act intended to sever Jewish ties to the land. Those that yelled for Jesus to be crucified were Jews.

Agreed, most of the people in the mob were Jews. Most of the followers of Jesus were Jews. Most of the indifferent bystanders were Jews. Most of the people in all the gospel stories were Jews (with the notable exception of the Romans, who did the actual crucifying).

My only objection here is to the claim that "the majority of the Jews voted to have Jesus crucified". I don't see that supported in the gospel stories.
  • Like
Reactions: Hentenza
Upvote 0

Women in Ministry

Jesus’ Treatment of Women

As far as I know, from what I read in the New Testament, Jesus always treated women with high honor and respect. He never talked down to a woman or treated any woman as though she was less valuable than a man, with maybe one exception.

As recorded in Matthew 15:21-28, it appears that Jesus’ seemingly harsh words to a Gentile woman were not meant in unkindness, but that they were meant to test her faith, and to lead her to stand up for what she believed, too. And then he honored her for her faith, which he said was “great faith.”

And when other men took advantage of women, for evil purposes, or when they mocked or criticized them, Jesus stood up for the women, and he protected them. And he cared about their needs, and he ministered to them, and he honored their faith. And, if he did rebuke them, he was loving and gentle in his rebuke. He was always tender with them, compassionate and loving. And he used women to share the gospel with men, too.

[John 8:1-11; Luke 7:36-50; Matthew 26:6-13; Mark 5:25-34; Luke 10:38-42; John 2:1-11; John 4:1-42; John 20:11-18.]

In fact, In Luke 7 we read that a Pharisee invited Jesus to eat with him at his house. When a woman who had a reputation heard he was there, she came there and she anointed his feet with ointment, and wet them with her tears, and wiped them with her hair, and caressed them with her kisses.

When the Pharisee disapproved of the woman, Jesus rebuked him. But what he said to the Pharisee was for the encouragement of the woman, as well. For, what Jesus said to the Pharisee is that everything that he should have done for Jesus, but did not do, the woman did do. For, he said, “she loved much.” And, he said to the woman, “Your faith has saved you; go in peace.”

And we read in Luke 8:1-3 that some women even traveled with Jesus and the disciples, too, and that they helped provide for Jesus’ and the disciples’ needs out of their own means.

I am assuming that the women made things which they sold for money, and that out of their earnings that they helped provide for Jesus and his disciples in the work of the ministry. So, they were co-laborers with Jesus and with his twelve male disciples in the ministry.

Your Daughters Shall Prophesy

And, when the Scriptures teach on the gifts of the Spirit, they do not differentiate between men and women, i.e. that some gifts are not for women. In fact, in Acts 2:17-18 we read:

“And in the last days it shall be, God declares,
that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh,
and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,
and your young men shall see visions,
and your old men shall dream dreams;
even on my male servants and female servants
in those days I will pour out my Spirit, and they shall prophesy.”

So, why is it then that we have these teachings in the New Testament that sound as though women are to always remain silent, that they are not to speak in the gatherings of the church, without exception? (1 Corinthians 14:34-35; 1 Timothy 2:11-12). Doesn’t that seem contradictory to how Jesus treated women? And isn’t it contradictory to the passage in Acts 2, and to other New Testament scriptures that speak of women prophesying?

And why is it that so many church congregations, at least here in America, do not allow their women to prophecy (preach) in their gatherings? And some pastors treat women as though they are dirt under their feet for them to walk on? For, Jesus never treated a woman like that. He valued women, and he used women in ministry, and he even sent women out to share the gospel with men. And the Holy Spirit of God gifted women to prophesy. So, why would God then turn around and put the smack down on women?

And, why, then would the Scriptures talk about how we are all one body in Christ, and that we are all necessary, and that one part should not say to another, “We have no need of you!”? And why would it teach that the body grows and builds itself up in love and in the faith as “each part” does its work? And then tell our women that their part, which God gave to them, and for which he gifted them, is not permitted? Is the church then not suppressing the gifts of women?

How can we resolve these seeming contradictions? Is it possible that these passages on the silence of women in the church can have another plausible explanation other than the complete and total suppression of the gift of prophecy among the women in the church? And, if so, what might that be?

For, women obviously prophesied in New Testament times (See: Luke 2:36; Acts 2:17; Acts 21:9; 1 Corinthians 11:5). So, how are we to understand this restriction of the silence of women in the church if God poured out his Spirit on both men and women so that they could prophesy, and we have recorded in the New Testament that there were indeed women who did prophesy? What is the context? What is the purpose of the restriction?

The Context Reveals

Well, the context of 1 Corinthians 14 is that of teaching on spiritual gifts, teaching on love, and instructions regarding the misuse of the gifts and the right way in which the gifts are to be used, and regarding their purpose, too. So, this is in the context of 1 Corinthians 12 and 13, also.

And it is in 1 Corinthians 12 where we are taught that each body part is necessary, and that we are not to say to another part of the body that we have no need of him or of her. And it is God who decides who gets what part, too. And it is the Holy Spirit who assigns the gifts.

And, here in 1 Corinthians 14 we are told first off to pursue love, and to earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that we would prophesy. And the one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding, consolation and encouragement. The one who prophesies edifies other believers, for the spiritual growth and advancement of them in the faith. He or she inspires, cheers, urges, nurtures, promotes and fosters spiritual maturity and holy walks in the Spirit of God, too, which is consistent with Ephesians 4:15-16.

So, if both women and men are gifted with the gift of prophecy, and we women are to use the gifts of the Spirit given to us for the upbuilding and the encouragement of the body of Christ, his church; and if not one of us is to say to another “We have no need of you,” and if all the parts are necessary, and women did prophesy in the New Testament, and the body of Christ is built up in the faith as “each part” does its work, then we have to conclude that these instructions on the silencing of women have a meaning other than the absolute silence of women in the church.

Order and Submission

So, again, let’s look at the context. The context has to do with how gifts are used, and it has to do with the order in which they are used. And, then let’s look at the wording of the passage, too. For, it all comes down to submission. It says that a woman, if she has questions regarding something she wants to learn, that she should ask her husband at home. So, apparently women were interrupting the order of service to ask questions. And some of this is definitely cultural to that day and time.

It also appears, by the context, that these women were usurping authority over the men, for it clearly instructs them that they are to be in submission to their husbands, and to the leadership of the church, and it indicates that they were stepping out of that order by speaking in the church gatherings in a disruptive way. So, these women were out of order in what they were doing.

And the passage in 1 Timothy 2 supports this, that women are not to usurp authority over the men, and that they are not to instruct men in an authoritative manner which would require men to obey them.

So, in conclusion, I believe God has gifted both men and women in various ways, and that Scripturally both men and women are gifted with the gift of prophecy (preaching), which is for the edification and encouragement of the body of Christ and for their strengthening and nurturing of them in the faith, that they may all reach maturity in Christ Jesus, their Lord.

I believe Jesus values women highly, that he gifts them in ministry, and that he calls them to prophesy (preach) the truths of Scriptures so that the body of Christ might be drawn closer to their Lord in walks of faith, and so that they may not wander off from the faith to go after what is false. I also believe that our Lord uses women sometimes in areas usually assigned to men, but that he does so when so many men are spiritually AWOL, and they are neglecting their callings (See Luke 7:36-50 as illustrative of this).

Lastly, I believe it all comes down to submission to the authorities within the church. If women are given permission to speak, and it is done in proper order, and if it is done in the right way, for the upbuilding of the body of Christ, then they should be allowed to speak. But they are not to usurp authority over the men nor to cause a disturbance in the congregation, and they are not to instruct men in the sense of being over men in authority. But they are to remain in submission and in proper order, and then they can speak as they are called upon to speak, as God gifts them to speak.

[Acts 2:14-18,42-47; Romans 12:1-8; 1 Corinthians 12:1-31; 1 Corinthians 14:1-5; Galatians 6:1; Ephesians 2:8-10; Ephesians 4:1-16; Ephesians 5:15-21; Ephesians 6:10-20; Philippians 2:1-8; Colossians 3:12-16; Titus 2:11-14; Hebrews 3:13; Hebrews 10:23-25; James 5:19-20]

Have Thine Own Way, Lord

Words by Adelaide A. Pollard, 1907
Music by George C. Stebbins, 1907


Have Thine own way, Lord! Have Thine own way!
Thou art the potter, I am the clay.
Mold me and make me after Thy will,
While I am waiting, yielded and still.

Have Thine own way, Lord! Have Thine own way!
Search me and try me, Master, today!
Whiter than snow, Lord, wash me just now,
As in Thy presence humbly I bow.

Have Thine own way, Lord! Have Thine own way!
Wounded and weary, help me I pray!
Power, all power, surely is Thine!
Touch me and heal me, Savior divine!

Have Thine own way, Lord! Have Thine own way!
Hold o'er my being absolute sway.
Fill with Thy Spirit till all shall see
Christ only, always, living in me!

Login to view embedded media
Caution: This link may contain ads

Women in Ministry
An Original Work / August 4, 2019
Reposted on November 7, 2025
(with slight editing)
Christ’s Free Servant, Sue J Love

Trump federalizing DC police, deploying National Guard in capital crime crackdown

As long as it's on your own time and doesn't interfere with your work (like supplying marriage licenses) of course.

Okay, I can get on board with that. If a cop says nasty things about gay people but treats them okay at work that would be fine.
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

Oh, there's a standard for how close a supermarket should've for every citizen in the city?
For every citizen? No. But cross referenced with poverty level, yes - that's what we've been discussing. Keep up.
Who created rhis standard?
The USDA.
I know a LOT of Middle income people who aren't a mile from a grocery store.
Okay? We're talking about people below the poverty line though.
Oh and what is that privilege I have had during my life?
Apparently the time and space to exercise, as well as access to reliable transportation, a grocery store, and cooking implements. Because you wouldn't be claiming that everyone has those things if you didn't.
Upvote 0

Are professed Christians that worship our Lord on Sunday instead of Saturday sinning?

There are dozens of religious sects under the banner of "Christian". My understanding is that they are all allowed to post questions and share philosophies on this forum. I am just interested in where your philosophy came from, that promotes that Ananias and Sapphira were not guilty of Transgressing God's commandments.
Tell me, what commandment did they violate? Does the biblical story reveals as such?
Clearly you are offended by the question.
I’m not offended at the question just miffed that you would ask “in my religion” given that I am here in a Christian website.
Upvote 0

Morality without Absolute Morality

Even if I wasn't a solipsist I'd probably still be asking myself that question.
You'd probably have better results if you were.
You would ask me to abandon my clock. But if I can't have faith enough to follow my own clock, what makes you think that I would have faith enough to follow someone else's?
Not asking you to do anything, just don't be surprised when your own clock is turned against you.
As if a morality that rests in someone's interpretation of a book is any better. Personally, I'll leave it where it belongs, in my compassion for my fellow man. When you find a commandment against that, let me know.
There certainly is no commandment against that, though your attempt to equate fitness with morality speaks against it considering all sorts of inhumane actions can be justified in the name of improving fitness.
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

Do you seriously need data for that?
Yeah.
Okay since you asked I was wrong. 50% of people live within 2 miles of a Supermarket. Thats really close. That means 50% dont. So while not a majority of people rhats still a lot of people.which pretty much supports my point that most people dont live within a mile of a supermarket.
Appreciate it.
Yeah thats what you choose when you live out in the country. Not sure what you are getting at. Are we supposed to have supermarkets out in the country?
You were complaining that the standard didn't take into account rural areas. I pointed out that it, in fact, does.
Just how long do you think a mile long bus ride lasts? You know I've lived in a city and ridden the bus a time or two. It doesn't rake long to go a couple of miles. Nothing g s going to spoil.
You compared the willingness of people to travel "cross-town" to go clothes shopping with a trip to the supermarket. I'm just pointing out the differences between those scenarios.
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

But fine; if you don't like "food desert," what word(s) should we use to describe a geographical area that does not meet the determined standard for grocery access relative to poverty level?

Oh, there's a standard for how close a supermarket should've for every citizen in the city? Who created rhis standard? I know a LOT of Middle income people who aren't a mile from a grocery store.
The yelling is both rude and unnecessary.
Sometimes one has to yell to get their point across cause no one's listening.
Your inability to recognize your privilege is not my problem.
Oh and what is that privilege I have had during my life?
Upvote 0

Chat thread - Friendship Court edition

I am doing okay too!! Yes it is kind of cold where I am. But I like cold and cool Weather!! :sorry::sorry::):):cookie::cookie::custard::custard:

Are you enjoying spring over where you are?
:):):cookie::cookie::custard::custard:
You like cold and cool Weather????
Then you will like Sydney weather, the weather is mostly a bit cool here.
We still sleep with BLANKETS during summer :)
Yes, spring is nice here, warmer yet no much rain.
Upvote 0

SNAP benefits ( gentally)

Do you have any data to support this assertion? Or are you just saying something that you think sounds right?
Do you seriously need data for that?

Okay since you asked I was wrong. 50% of people live within 2 miles of a Supermarket. Thats really close. That means 50% dont. So while not a majority of people rhats still a lot of people.which pretty much supports my point that most people dont live within a mile of a supermarket.

And theae so called food deserts arw around a mile. All of that is very close.
Note that the standard is, in fact, 10 miles for a rural area:
Yeah thats what you choose when you live out in the country. Not sure what you are getting at. Are we supposed to have supermarkets out in the country?
Especially considering that some groceries spoil if left unrefrigerated too long.
Just how long do you think a mile long bus ride lasts? You know I've lived in a city and ridden the bus a time or two. It doesn't rake long to go a couple of miles. Nothing g s going to spoil.

Again, what are you expecting? A supermarket on every block?
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

How is this "indigenous" knowledge acquired? By observation and experience? That's the way "scientific" knowledge is acquired as well. What's the difference?
I think any determinations about reality starts with observations. You can't do anything without observations. The difference is that in science its a 3rd party endeavour. Its looking from the outside in. Or rather removing the subject from the equation.

Whereas ancient and indigenous knowledge is including the subject. When you say by observation and (experience) I don't think science fully captures experience and especially conscious experiences as a layer or aspect of reality. They exclude this and for good reasons.

Science is only looking at one aspect of reality which is quantifiable in terms of a assumption that reality is fundementally physical or naturalistic and measured in terms of matter, particles, fields, forces and even epiphenomena that are caused by the physical such as consciousness.

So already we have a big gap or difference in how the world and reality is seen. Or before what is being measured as to what is reality. Science excludes a big chunk of human experiences and knowledge directly with nature and reality when immersed in it.

Before the age of Enlightenment and especially the further you go back we see a completely different worldview or reality. One governed by God or the gods or spirits or whatever transcedent belief was held. But fundementally the same.

So science cannot in the first place even understand this paradigm let alone make objective claims that all reality is tiny bits of matter and there is nothing beyond.

That is why I used the example of the Christian worldview and how this contains knowledge beyond the scientific material worldview. The observations at least with testimony are the same. Something happened beyond the naturalistic processes. The knowledge is different to the naturalistic explanations.

Thus on this basis unless you want to declare all religions and beliefs in such transcedent knowledge is all conspiracy and whacko. Which I think you can't because the methodology used is not even able to determine that. Then we have another layer of knowledge that is a reality itself and needs to be looked into as a real influence on reality, nature and the world.

Coming full circle now and after a few hundred years of Enlightement and science it seems strange that many areas of science are turning back to this fundemental idea that conscious experience and the role of the subject being immersed in reality which cannot really be seperated from it is gaining attention.

It seems we cannot really know reality when we seperate the subject out as there is always a subjective and transcedent element to it even in science.

So maybe the majority of our history being immersed in nature and reality as subjects and the knowledge that came from this was more real then perhaps what science tells us. Which came along relatively recent and purposely goes about seperating the subject out. Which actually also seperated a big chunk or knowledge about reality that seemed to be the majority of our history.

In fact not only seperates out but actively forces this aspect and knowledge out and thus we see the loss of Indigneous knowledge. Which I think points to this being more about belief than fact or truth ultimately or fundementally. In other words the methodology epistemically is forced over other ways of knowing.

Relegating the ancient and Indigenous knowledge as superstition or make belief when it was probably closer to reality than the material and naturalistic worldview. Or at least an important aspect that gives a deeper knowledge of reality.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,877,808
Messages
65,407,700
Members
276,349
Latest member
Linda Marie