chevyontheriver said:

Appetite does matter, but then again some people eat very little and cannot lose weight. Their bodies think they are starving so to defend against starving their bodies conserve every possible calorie.

Click to expand...

Voluntary starving is also unhealthy.

I eat just around 1500 calories each day. My basal metabolic rate (BMR) is also 1500 calories but I also exercise every day on top of it and my daily calories burned can exceed 2000 calories.

At some point, the body simply becomes more energy efficient. My actual BMR and the actual calories burned in exercise could be lower than what gadgets and calculators show.

Those smart watches can only show you estimates. The only way you'll get actual numbers is having your blood circulated through a device that measures the blood's chemistry in real time. So far only professional athletes use those.

Suspect in shootings of Brown University and MIT professor found dead

The suspect ‍in last week's ‌mass shooting at Brown University has been found dead in a storage facility in Salem, New Hampshire, following a six-day multi-state manhunt, police say.

They identified the suspect as Claudio Neves Valente, 48, a Portuguese national who studied at the university in Providence, Rhode Island, about 25 years ago.

Brown University president Christina Paxson said that Valente was enrolled at the Ivy League school from the autumn of 2000 to the following spring, and was studying for a PhD in physics.

Officials said they believe Valente shot and killed MIT professor Nuno F Gomes Loureiro, 47, on Monday at his home in Brookline, which is about 50 miles (80km) from Providence.

I'm unable to post with a link for some reason. Article is from BBC.

Rose_bud said:

@Richard T Thank you for this.


I recently watched a clip/summary of the Azusa Revival, and the message of what that movement meant is so lost and overshadowed by what some regard as sensationalist accounts. The truth of that experience is summed up in the context in which it manifested. In a time of racial tension and segregation, that unity would've been a powerful counter-cultural witness. This outpouring united people from different backgrounds in their understanding of the gospel, breaking down barriers. God's Spirit transcends human divisions, creating one body out of many.

Click to expand...

As to the Azusa revival, I find it quite interesting that Parnham and his students at Bethel College in Topeka, KS committed to be like the church in Acts, even pooling all their goods in common. That was where the Holy Ghost fell first and was later taken to Azusa street.
So unity, sharing in common, and seeking God all brought on the spark for revival. Perhaps a rededication to Acts is in order?

By the time we get to heaven God’s work will be complete. We’ll no longer will to sin because we’ve been perfected in love, which excludes sin by its nature. It’s a matter of man’s will cooperating with grace, progressively becoming convinced of the perfection of God’s wisdom and will until we meet Him, the true source and fulfillment of all human desire, “face to face” in the next life. There’s simply no more to be wanted and absolute satisfaction, exaltation, and happiness are the result. We’ll finally be completely in love with the true God, with our whole heart, soul, mind, and strength. .

You still haven't been honest about Isaiah 13 yet. Answer these 4 questions simple yes or no.

Does it start explaining a massive army against Babylon?

Does it later on answer who that is by mentioning the Medes?

Does it mention the tools of ancient battle, from swords and fire and dashing babies against rocks?

And are the dark sun verses in the middle of all this?

Oh and if you're going to appeal to the destruction of the "whole world" , the word in the Hebrew can refer to land or world. Context tells us.
The context here?
War against specific kingdom.
Therefore - it's land. The whole land was destroyed.
It's just how the Hebrew works.
If you pretend anything else - you actually know that you're kidding yourself!

But with you playing eisegesis every few verses, you don't have to deal with this pesky thing called "context" do you?

You usually just avoid that and get over excited about copying and pasting endless other scenes of battle, and writing all about astronomical events.

But tell me, have you studied ancient Hebrew? Have you studied the way ancient Hebrews used apocalyptic symbolism? Have you at any point in the last 5 years read any of the material I have suggested for you to help you come to terms with these passages?

Have you read any of the non canonical and historical apocalyptic symbolism?

The extra material written 200 BC to 200 AD?

If the answer is no, and you just want to call everyone who does these things swine, then call me a swine!

Because I respect those who bother to do basic hermeneutics BEFORE writing rubbish about the Bible for 5 years!

You're commenting on some fairly tricky passages without even the basic skills of the craft. It's comparable someone trying to make claims from the ancient Greek - without even knowing a word of Greek.

If you honestly read the whole of chapter Isaiah 13 you will see what it is about.

The real question is do you have the character to admit it?

So presidential. He didn't even draw a mustache on Biden's face with a sharpie.

I think every school should have a debate club where everyone agrees with each other.

Stops them from bothering other people.

I think its all linked, 'they who conquered by the blood of the lamb, by the word of their testimoney and they loved not their lives even unto death.

These three aspects go together and on their own are not the same.

What is the testimony. It is their testimony of the blood of the lamb which is Christ. Christs blood conquers satan, sin and death.

But I think the last part, "for they loved not their lives even unto death" is the reality that occurs in the world. This is the evidence of Christs blood defeating death in that those who testify on the blood of the lamb are willing to give up their earthly lives as part of that testimony. Making it real in this life and the next.

Dave... said:

It's important to understand the history of it in the Old Testament to know what is actually happening in Corinth when Paul speaks about it, both encouraging, and rebuking.

CHAPTER 9

Tongues is just a sixteenth century word for languages. I think that some people like the term 'tongues' because it giveth them a magic hocus pocus feeling. It just means languages. No need for the sign anymore. It's primary purpose has went and gone. The secondary uses that were necessary to keep it Biblical went with it. One of the main reasons tongues were spoken at Pentecost pointed towards A.D 70. as was noted in the link provided, God's judgment on Israel. Tongues were also spoken to show by way of miracle that God's "Promise of the Father" that was owed to OT saints was being given, the NT indwelling that all Christians receive the moment Jesus places the Holy Spirit in them, called the baptism with the Holy Spirit. It also showed that God was undoing the confusion of languages that He caused way back in Babylon to evangelize the whole world. The Gentiles were now grafted in per Romans 11:17-24 to provoke Israel to jealousy. Please at least glance over the link provided if you're going to respond. Thanks.

Dave

Click to expand...

My two cents:
I wish we would just stick to the definition of the first outpouring of the gift of tongues, why it was so important at this event and why " understanding " was vital to the mission of His Gospel. There wasn't one language, there were many languages being spoken. Coincidentally, there were Jews from different parts of the land all speaking those different languages. Tongues served to " spread" the Gospel to all with no language barrier. Other than that, all this angel prayer language stuff is just a diversion and frankly a false sense of Holyness. Additionally, tongues that have no interpretation is just as Paul described, ones own selfish edification.
Self-edification (via uninterpreted tongues) in a public setting is detrimental because it promotes what only benefits the speaker while neglecting the needs of the whole assembly, which Paul criticizes as a lack of focus on the common good and love for others. Lastly, an unintelligible collection of sounds is not a language and no one is able to interpret. Let us reason, please.

Blessings

Paidiske said:

I'll leave that to you, since that seems to me to be a distortion of the text as written.

Click to expand...

Thanks for you participation...

I am unsure how one can be prepared for martyrdom without first achieving death to self by identifying with the crucified Christ.

What happened to‘I die daily’ and ‘I am crucified with Christ’- it is no longer I that live?

Valletta said:

They used them as pawns all in a quest for one-party control of the country.

Click to expand...

How so?

fhansen said:

The real problem is people in general. Even the holiest of us will be imperfect relative to God. So some degree of corruption or compromise will always prevail here on this earth. But does that mean we should just give up and isolate ourselves?

Humans are both individual and social beings. Our relationship with God is individual but also corporate as the Body, with a unity, also yet imperfect in this life, that we were created to have.

So do we ignore injustice in this world, or, alternatively, simply depend on the goodwill of believers to somehow prevent or rectify injustices? Or, instead, does a just socieity unite together under some model of government and legislate against immoral behavior such as, say murder? Or against the excesses that capitalists might go to maximize profits, including the exploitation of labor, creation of monopolies, etc? Anyway, as long as people are involved there can be no perfect political or governmental system; they're all compromises that we must nonetheless use in order to promote the common good, hopefully guided by Christian principles to the best we can.

Click to expand...

Thats a good way of putting it and I agree. It seems that all of the political ideas and beliefs and wars are happening within a certain realm that is of the world.

As all humans know Gods laws you don't have to be a Christian to know this. But the world will have their ideas about what this represents and how we can order society and the world to apply this.

So for Gods Kingdom and Christs church as a community of Christians we are no of that realm in which these battles happen. We can pull out the value and moral similarities that come from politicial and civil ideologies. But they are not within the same realm and we can easily be overcome when trying to work within that worldly realm.

I think for Christians its a completely different realm and not of this world and as a community we have to be different in how we present the gospel and Christ to the world. If we mix it with world ideologies and within that frame we will lose. We will be competing on their terms.

So I think that means the only way to differentiate is Christ. It sounds simple but doing so is different to the war of words within the political arena. In fact it seems that todays arena is a post modernist one which undermines Christs truth by claiming there is no truth. So words themselves become the reality. You can't beat narratives about persoanl and subjective truths from experiences.

But what is the one thing everyone agrees on and which has turned people away from God. Its hypocracy. Its talking the talk and not walking the walk. They never see clearly the reality of Christ working within His church.

So logically if we apply this to Christians who are suppose to be the ones who are transfromed to be Christlike. If more Christians actually live what Christ taught in the bible then it stands to reason that Christians would not only have the words but live the words.

Thus being one group who cannot be accused as hypocrites.

Now that would doubly turn heads. Because not only for once is a group actually doing what they preach. But they are displaying what is suppose to be the very examples Peter says that will turn peoples heads to God without any words spoken.

Dan1988 said:

Please enlighten me, by showing me where the Bible says that unbelievers are annihilated, or that they cease to exist. Save yourself the headache and don't bother looking for that non existent doctrine, you will never find any such nonsense in the bible.

Click to expand...

Enlighten you? Doubtful that will happen. Many people have shown you scripture that you continue to ignore. It's apparent you're not interested in having an honest biblical discussion. So why bother? Hopefully down the line you'll be open to some honest discussion but at this point no one can even discuss scripture with you because you continue to ignore the ones posted.

zelosravioli said:

No man has died the second death yet - the Lake of fire - IS the ‘second’ death.

Click to expand...

Yes, exactly. It's so simple.

Stopped_lurking said:

I also have problem posting, and editing posts.

Click to expand...

Might be a sign this thread might have a mod looking through it.

Might, I say.

I can't post my full reply. How bizarre.

Test.

Nicolai said:

Frankly the question I want to ask if "How do you deal with there NOT being any evidence for any of that" or "How do you make sense of archaeological evidence directly contradicting the Old Testament (the size of Israel/Jerasulem under David & Solomon for one).".

I cannot stop thinking about this question! Every time I watch any content and they talk about Moses, Solomon, or David all I can think of is that they never existed the way the OT says. If they did why is there zero evidence to support those claims? We have records to support the claims made by the OT after the alleged reign of David but it would seem that everything written in the OT prior to the 8thish century is just cultural & national narrative. I try to understand this on a spiritual level and not on a literal but I can't stop thinking about it.

Has anyone else struggled with this? Is there evidence I am missing? Is there a way to think about this that doesn't make much of the Pentateuch essentially historical fiction?

Click to expand...

I think this will depend on the amount and quality of evidence. That in itself can be subjective and based on false assumptions due to a lack of data.

Part of this is understanding the context which not only includes the stories in relation to the Hebrew religion and culture but also of the entire worldview at the time and whether the stories are meant to be more of a spiritual revelation than completely reliant on scientific or verified eye witness accounts.

There are so many factors that need to be considered that I am surprised that anyone could make any truth claims without such investigation.

The only topic I know something about is the Exodus and as far as I see opinions have changed over time as new evidence or understandings come in. That in itself tells us that whatever it was that so called experts claimed as the facts was based on poor data.

Part of the problem may be the timelines and not necessarily whether something matches the biblical stories. But timelines themselves are questionable.

But we have clear evidence for much of what happened. In fact we now have evidence from the Egyptian side of the story which matches the bible. Such as the telling of the 10 plagues that hit Egypt at around this time by the Egyptians themselves. Speaking of plagues, rivers running red, sons dying and crops and cattle failing. This cannot just be a coincident.

There are other evidences I could cite. But as far as I know the evidence actually supports the Exodus story. It may not 100% but then some of that is more about perspective than reality. But there is clear evidence of a proto Isrealites in Egypt who rose up to become prominent and then escaped into the desert with many others.

Then we have them entering Canaan. We even have some evidence of the places they stopped. Mt Sinai, the alters with evidence of animal sacrifice. A memorial placed at the point where the Isrealites crossed the Red sea. Theres evidence from Egyptian Steles and letters and archeology.

I am not sure how deep you have gone into this but there are some good research out there and its amazing that people don't know this.

Actual EVIDENCE for the Exodus​

Login to view embedded media

PloverWing said:

I wouldn't want to have to draw Jesus in the poses that Charlie Hebdo chose for Muhammad, just to demonstrate that I'm different from Timothy McVeigh. Nobody should die over offensive speech, but nobody should be compelled to repeat the offensive speech, either.

Click to expand...

peter2 said:

The 4 evangelists have obviously disapproved all what they did to Jesus up to death, however silently.
Yet, i assume they considered a duty to write the Gospel.

Besides, i certainly would have disapproved an offending caricature of Jesus.
Yet, if a teacher teaching his pupils to keep cool had to be beheaded for showing them this document, i would also certainly have considered it a christian duty (to testify of this posthumous suffering of Jesus) to publish the document myself, in order to tell the whole story (even with illustrated caricatures).
it looks like i'm not worshipping the same person as muslims do

Click to expand...

May i conclude, please, from the non response there's no reason for me to think i've mistaken ?

Or, may be my message was not clear enough (?)
Please, could someone at least just tell me whether it was clear or not..

keras said:

Not very smart. Death can come to anyone at any time.

Click to expand...

Exactly.
So it doesn't matter if you say that Jesus is coming back in 20 years time and you will be in the Holy Land - you may not be alive then.
It doesn't matter if "the fiery wrath" is in a few years, we could be dead by then.

keras said:

The condition is; that we gather and live in the Holy Land. THEN Jesus will appear to His faithful Christian peoples

Click to expand...

Says no one except you.
Are you saying that we can delay the Lord's return simply by never going to live in the Holy Land?

keras said:

That the NC is not yet made, is proved by Hebrews 8:10-12 being unfulfilled.

Click to expand...

Again, so you say. but you haven't replied to my statement, and verses, about God's word being in our hearts now.

I don't know about you, but I am a New Testament (New Covenant) Christian - living after the resurrection and Pentecost, knowing God's forgiveness, assured of being his child and having his Word in my heart.

keras said:

A Covenant was not made with the 12 Disciples.

Click to expand...

The New Covenant is that anyone who comes to Jesus has eternal life, John 3:16, 3:36, 6:40.
Anyone who comes to Jesus and receives him, is a child of God, John 1:12.
That we can know that we are a child of God, Romans 8:16-17.
If anyone confesses their sin, God will forgive them and make them clean, 1 John 1:9.
That Jesus is our Good Shepherd, John 10:11. That he came to give us life, John 10:10 and that no one can snatch us from God's hand, John 10:29.

keras said:

The Disciples are all gone; the NC must be made between Jesus and living people.

Click to expand...

I'm a disciple and I'm still here.
All believers are disciples (learners) and followers.

keras said:

Those things are just the birth pangs of the new age to come. That they are getting closer together, is a sign of the immanence of the end.

Click to expand...

These things have always been happening.
For many people, WWI was the end. For many others, WWII was the end. People throughout history have said, "look, the end is nigh" - look at Harold Camping.

keras said:

How can anyone say that? It means you dismiss all the Prophecy from now until the Return

Click to expand...

I don't believe there is any new prophecy.
I don't dismiss OT prophecy, I just don't interpret it as you do.