• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trump to pardon Ex-Honduras President Guilty of Drug Trafficking and conspiring to import cocaine into the United States

In our society, we celebrate the practice of providing a legal defense for the accused, whether they turn out guilty or innocent...

Here, you're telling me that it's foolish to do the same in a non-legal, social environment.

I couldn't disagree more. Because open, respectful conversation, even if your views are in the minority, is helpful in subtle ways, regardless of whether the help is passed on directly or indirectly. Especially if the indirect aspect results in diminishing groupthink tendencies which are often egotistical in nature.
You spoke of defending “unjustifiable” action.
You want to defend unjustifiable action?
Upvote 0

Zions New Children

I said the 12 + James, and I gave you Acts 8:1.

If you want to believe otherwise, I am fine.
Sure Acts 8:1 shows their love for and focus on Jerusalem.
Generally speaking they saw that as their general focus - while the 'new' apostle Paul had the amazing ministry to the Gentiles.
But it was not as segregated as you claimed when you said:

"The 12 + James never left Jerusalem in their lifetime, because the nation of Israel never accepted Christ as their Messiah. Cornelius was a one off incident and he was saved under the same program that Israel had."​

Cornelius WAS saved by the gospel - read the chapter! And the whole point of it was that he was not a Jew, but a Gentile - so this business of being "saved under the same program that Israel had" is not true. Peter's talk might have had some rhetorical flourish in the way he said "as you already know" or it might have actually been the case. But whatever the matter before Peter's arrival, by the end of the chapter Cornelius is a gospel believing spirit filled Gentile. And it took Peter and John - 2 of the 12, to actually leave Jerusalem.

Oh - then you want us to forget that Peter goes to Lydda, then Joppa, then in 10:23 Caesarea / Cornelius. Acts 9:32–43

And as I said, other senior church leaders from Jerusalem were also sent out. I grant Philip the evangelist is not one of the 12, but a senior leader. It shows while they where primarily caught up in the ministry in Jerusalem, there was some overlap with Gentile ministry in other cities as well.
(Acts 8:5 Samaria, 8:40 then Caesarea.)
Upvote 0

Biblical Exegesis explanation and discussion

All pre-Origen uses of the word speak to it as an act of vivification, not a theory of inspiration
That determination would be quite subjective.
Primacy, sure. But not the sole rule, prima scriptura is not the same thing as sola scriptura.
Ok but what other scripture is God breathed? Would you follow a doctrine that was not biblical?
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

They're high speed drug smuggling boats. Carrying huge amounts of drugs. Speeding towards the US.
Although some in the Trump Administration have tried to assert this, this is not credible.
Upvote 0

Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’

It is not 'second class citizens' to not be granted access to investigative files. This is not something the DOJ spills publicly on a regular basis.
I was talking about the oppression of the Right in general during the past administration; but I don't want to get off topic.

Which corruption? The people potentially associated with Epstein?
That depends on what you mean by association.

his administration's lax promulgation and enforcement of ethics for its officials, and we can see who the Swamp is.
I'm pleased with the progress that has been made with DOGE and the corruption behind the flood of illegals into our country; but let's try to stay on topic.
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

The southern tip of Florida isn't that far away from the northern shores of Venezuela.
1100 miles as the crow flies. 1300+ miles if you take an actually physically possible route Sure, that's not too far :rolleyes:

1764893041494.png
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

I'm sorry, you think the drug trade has stopped? You think blowing up a few boats has stopped a $100 Billion dollar industry?
I actually said the boats have just about stopped. That particular method of smuggling the drugs has almost be completely stopped. Based on the fact that the warnings were given and then the action was taken and the warning that any further boats will also be targeted.

That changes the ball game. Now the Narcos have to access the risk. Before there was no risk and now there is. The risk of being blown out of the water, being killed and losing all their drugs. Its a pretty big factor that is now being forced onto the narcos which has changed the game.
Upvote 0

Trump dispenses with trials, orders military strike on alleged Venezuelan drug-trafficking boat (Now up to 2, 3, 4...)

They're high speed drug smuggling boats. Carrying huge amounts of drugs. Speeding towards the US. The southern tip of Florida isn't that far away from the northern shores of Venezuela.
Geography isn’t my long suit but this is well over 1000 miles.
Upvote 0

Zions New Children

I already said "National Israel", how clearer you want?
No - you were talking about how the Apostles never left Jerusalem in previous posts.
That is not true. Some did. But otherwise...
That national Israel rejected Christ (Romans 11:11), allowing salvation to go to gentiles.
Well - I pretty much agree. We could be on the same page then - at least regards to this!

I apologise. I'm Australian, you're in Singapore, and this is the internet.
I probably assumed something else was going on - as this forum can get real weird, real fast.
Soz.
Upvote 0

AND WHAT IS PAUL MEAN IN HEBREWS 8:13. ??

# 1 IN //. EN /////I is. a PREPOSITION''

# 2 THAT HE SAITH /////. LEGO. is in the PRESENT TENSE. in. the ACTIVE VOICE

# 3 A NEW //////. KAINOS. is. in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 4. COVENANT //// DIATHEKE

# 5 HE HATH. MADE /////PALAIOO. is in. the PERFECT TENSE in. the INDICATIVE MOOD pin. the INDICATIVE MOOD in. the SINGULAR

# 6 THE ////// HO is a DEFINITE ARTICLE. in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# 7 FIRST //////. PROTOS in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE in. the SIGNULAR

# 8 OLD. //// PALAOO. is. in. the PERFECT TENSE in. the ACTIVE VOICE in. the INDICATIVE MOOD in. the SINGULAR

# 9 NOW /// DE is a CONJUNCATION

# 10 THAT WHICH DECAYETH. ////. PALAIOO is. in. the PRESENT TENSE in. the ACTIVE VOICE in. the NOMINTIVE CASE

in. the SINGULAR in. the NEUTER

# 11 AND //// KAI. is a CONJUNCATION

# 12 WEAXETH. OLR //// GORAS. is in. the PRESENT TENSE in. the ACTIVE VOICE is a PARTICPLE in. the NOMINATIVE CASE

in. the NOMINATIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR in. the NEUTER

# 13. READY ///. ONGYS. is and adverb

#14. TO VANISH AWAY. ///. APHANISMOS. in v the v. GENITIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR

# A AND Paul who wrote HEBREWS shows that the OLD COVENANT was to VENISH AWAY. and Paul did not ONLY. write. about it BUT

saw it VANISH AWAY !!

#B Hebtews 9 :18. shows why. THE OLD COVENANT. had to pass AWAY as animal sacrifices could not and NEVER save UNTIL

Christ died on. he CROSS

# C. Born Again or BORN of WATER. OR Unless ONE. is BORN OF WATER. AND THE SPIRIT. he cannot enter the KINGDOM of GOD .

# D. AS we are under the Law , PERIOD. !1. Rom 6:14

# E. WE are under GRACE , PERIOD ROM 6:14

# F PAUL REIGINS who preaches fr by GRACE ARE YOU SAVED

dan p

THE GREAT CONTROVERSY in Baltimore, Maryland

Either way → Bible (no, not either way)

1. We distribute Bibles (Bibles, yes)
2. The Great Controversy points to the Bible (as shown in my second post). (Denominational dogmatics, not the Bible)
As I recall, the famed H. L. Mencken (who, curiously, lived in Baltimore) wrote a short story where he parodied the enthusiasm of popular religious revivalists of his day with a trainload of joyous Catholics promoting their faith. I wonder if the folks in the SDA would view the Catechism of the Catholic Church as pointing to the Bible.
Upvote 0

There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History

Are you still into proving that? Why do you even want to?
Trying to prove this by what measure. Thats sort of the point. That you want this verified by material science and because it cannot be verified its all fake.

The reason why its important to acknowledge that there is alternative and what we would consider advanced knowledge is because epistemically it shows that there is more than one way to gain knowledge about the world and reality for that matter.

Once this is accepted then people will stop before they make absolute claims that there is only one way to understand reality. They will be open to the possibility that there may have been ancients who had knowledge beyond what methological naturalism can explain.

But if you reject this out of hand then this is already being biased and narrow minded which is more about belief than reality.
Upvote 0

B flat B♭

Here is a video which shows you why/how the sun, moon & stars are upside down in the south & it's really simple.

Login to view embedded media
Still doesn't explain why everything rotates around a South Celestial pole in the Southern Hemisphere, how people looking due South from Cape Town in South Africa and people looking due South from Punta Arenas in Chile both see the Southern Cross while looking in directions almost 90° apart.
So while it attempts to give a reasonable explanation for the clockwise vs. anticlockwise motion of the sky in the two hemispheres, it completely fails to explain most other observations, thus it is a false explanation. Flat earth fails again.
  • Like
Reactions: Hentenza
Upvote 0

Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’

Yep, half the country were second class citizens during that Administration.

It is not 'second class citizens' to not be granted access to investigative files. This is not something the DOJ spills publicly on a regular basis.

Good to see that some on the Left joined some on the Right to fight corruption.
Which corruption? The people potentially associated with Epstein?

Donald Trump has been the most reluctant corruption fighter on that issue when it became real and not a campaign promise. Combine that with his pardons for people convicted of public corruption, his administration's lax promulgation and enforcement of ethics for its officials, and we can see who the Swamp is.
Upvote 0

Zions New Children

A remnant did, not the entire nation, as Paul explained in Romans 9-11

You were talking about the leaders - not the repentance of the entire people group.
I don't know what you are saying otherwise. The subject seems to blur. Try to be clearer.
So that he could defend Paul's gospel as legitimate later on in Acts 15
Nope! So that he could do what he did in THAT passage - which was preach the gospel to Cornelius and confirm that indeed the Gentiles were in the kingdom, as were the Jews.

God poured the Holy Spirit out on them. Peter was astonished at the reality of the unity of the new kingdom!
THAT is what Cornelius was about - not pivoting to some other ministry later on!

I meant Acts 8:1
"On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria."
OK - but that's highlighting that the Apostles really loved their ministry to Jerusalem.
THEN guess what?
Acts continues.
And we see the Apostles I have already listed going out into all the world.

Why are we having this conversation?
What does this all mean to you? What's the bottom line on your reading of the Apostles staying behind in Jerusalem - and IF it were true (it's not) that none of them EVER left Jerusalem (they did) - why is that important, given the clear teaching of the New Testament as to who God's people are?
Upvote 0

B flat B♭

EVERYONE "poses such a risk" to Satan, as we are created in God's image, fearfully and wonderfully made. And, EVERYONE is already "targeted." And, "their secret weapon" is NOT hidden (again, "Revelation of the Method").
I rebuke satan in the name of Jesus our Lord and Savior. There. I’m fine now.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,188
Messages
65,430,130
Members
276,429
Latest member
Mika101