Can democratic Socialism save America?
- By Yarddog
- General Politics
- 8 Replies
That has nothing to do with Democratic Socialism. Look it up.But they identify as socialist. Look it up.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That has nothing to do with Democratic Socialism. Look it up.But they identify as socialist. Look it up.
Exactly—Corinth’s problem was love-less greed, not quiet doubts.Sometimes I don't, but usually I remind myself that the solemnity is not in my performance but in the testament to God's faithfulness. My understanding of the text in question is that the unworthy manner was because they were missing the fellowship that the Lord's Supper speaks to, through their flagrant injustices towards one another.
Also when I read the words 'blood and soil' Hitler was the furthest from my mind in relation to American history of fighting for anti slavery and the principles of freedoms and democracy.When you consider the vast library of Hitler quotes from various long & laborious speeches (that were scattershot across a myriad of subjects), is it perhaps too easy of a jab to take to merely find "resemblances"?
Overlap in policy & rhetoric doesn't necessarily mean perfect overlap in terms ideological agreement.
"America for Americans" and "France is for the French" existed before Hitler.
And Hitler made quotes about vegetarianism and animal welfare, and I'm sure we could find some "similar sounding" rhetoric between his statements and that of PETA. That wouldn't mean PETA (or the animal rights movement more broadly) should be linked with a propensity for Nazism.
And one certainly doesn't have to be a Nazi to hold the position that fundamentalist Islam is incompatible with Westernized society.
And that's a bidirectional opinion for that matter... Many in the west feel that way... and many Fundamentalist Muslims in the Middle East also feel that their religious ideology and the "excesses of the West" are incompatible.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that at some of those anti-Israel protests that were happening at Harvard, there were probably a lot of things being shouted and written on signs that we could probably track down some overlap with.
Isaiah 30:26, specifically mentions the sun as causing all the graphically Prophesied things. A CME is a one day event; the blast carries on into outer space."Also, consuming fire." In addition to.
"For our God is a consuming fire." is referring to both His countenance (Exodus 24:17, Revelation 1:16, Revelation 19:11-16) and His wrath (Jeremiah 4:4, Revelation 6:15-17, Revelation 19:21). His countenance is like the sun. A CME isn't necessary. Fire and brimstone from heaven comes after the thousand year reign of Christ (2 Peter 3:7, Revelation 20:7-9).
I watched the video in the OP months ago. The presenter of the video in question has a BA in ancient history. That does not make him an "academic".Actually if you listened to the video its was an academic who cited his credentials who was presenting the video. He was taking an academic appraoch. Thats is what I have been doing. I stated that the views on how this might have come about such as knowledge from immersions in nature was spectualtion.
Jesus said: I know you are descended from Abraham....If you really were Abrahams children, you would act as Abraham did. John 8:37-40Don't negate the promise to Abraham of the "seed" which will never die which means ethnic Jews (biological descendants of Abraham). We don't replace Israel, as Paul says, we gentiles are grafted in. The original branches are still there and will always be.
No you don't hope too much. For God nothing is impossible and I believe He does not allow for His church to go for too long without a correction.Y'know, with the way the world is, one would think Christians would see the need to unite together for mutual support and encouragement rather than wrangle over certain points of the faith ad infinitum. But I guess I hope for too much.
Not specifically Muslim, but major political changes in general tend to break down to 10% on one side, 10% on the other, and 80% who are simply worried about their day to day living and can't be bothered with bigger issues.And where is there only 10% Muslim population where this has happened?
You're splitting hairs, and seem to be invoking a bit of a no true scotsman thing.Oh great, another poster who doesn't know how liberal & progressives aren't leftists. You need to get a leftist to explain it to you.
And in. 1 John 5;18. SAYS that. whosoever is BORN. OF GOD. SINNETH NOT // OV. is a DISJUNCATIVE PARTICLE NEGATIVEYou seem to be stuck in complication and self justifications land dan
"-everyone who loves knows God and is born of God" capital word spellings not required, but I like the bold
The left comes up with one scandal after the other.
How can you not understand that post. If you buy corn, it's going to come from Iowa. If you buy oranges, they'll likely come from California. Some basic foodstuffs that you buy can be home grown. But check out your pantry. I literally just walked into my kitchen and 5 of the first 6 things I looked at were from Pakistan, China, Italy, UK and Thailand. Put tariffs on those and they'll cost me more.But you mentioned it effecting international trade... Now you're backpedaling. Are you now saying international trade isn't effected by the tariffs? Only Americans feel the crunch?
It most certainly does not leave any such impossibility. There's no need for the success of the drawing to depend on force in order for it to create the possibility of success. It is only within a Calvinist framework that the need for force is required, because the act of being drawn is presented as a sufficient grounds for coming to Jesus. You are imposing your conclusion onto the text, and then engaging in grammatical puffery as if that is argumentation.I skimmed your latest set of assertions. I will not waste my time responding point by point because the pattern is clear: claims are being offered without engaging the actual argument or evidence I've presented. It is not my burden to disprove your assertions; it is yours to substantiate them. If you want a substantive discussion, raise focused, textually and methodologically grounded objections. Broad dismissals and unfounded accusations do not qualify as argument and do not merit serious engagement.
To clarify the stakes: your position on ἑλκύω implies that, syntactically, John 6:44 leaves coming to Jesus potentially impossible -- a consequence of your view I have already argued and that you have ignored. You have also ignored that the semantics of ἑλκύω are irrelevant to the Calvinist argument itself. Once again, you are sidestepping the actual issue and fishing for something to latch onto just to have a reply. I am not going to play that game. Until you offer a focused, substantive objection that engages these points seriously, this conversation is over.