B flat B♭
- By Apple Sky
- Conspiracy Theories
- 2263 Replies
Many flat earth videos not not understand basic flat earth concepts.
So please let us know.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Many flat earth videos not not understand basic flat earth concepts.
Honestly, how could this pastor sensationaliz a private conversation with the son of the President that was supposedly planned in the early mornings, 12:30 am, then turn around and expose this private conversation with the world?Knechtle claimed

There is a moment in every true conversion, not the dramatic kind, but the hidden, lifelong kind, when we stop trying to look at God and finally allow Him to look at us.
Some, ignorantly, consider social justice to be a secular pursuit, perhaps thinking Christians should just isolate themselves from this unholy world rather than attempt to help make it holier. Social justice is really about feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, caring for the poor, standing up for victims, upholding righteousness, opposing injustice where it’s found.
I’ve been reflecting a lot on the tension many Christians feel around the phrase “social justice.” It’s a topic that seems to trigger strong reactions from different sides of the church — both progressive and conservative — even though Scripture speaks frequently about justice, mercy, the poor, and the oppressed.
In studying this subject, I’ve noticed that there seems to be one main reason many believers push back against the idea of “social justice” today. What’s interesting is that I’ve heard this same objection from both sides of the political spectrum, even though they frame it differently.
Rather than turning this into a political debate, I’m curious from a theological standpoint:
What do you think is the primary reason Christians object to talk of “social justice”?
Is it:
- a misunderstanding of the biblical meaning of justice?
- a reaction to how the term is used culturally or politically?
- fear of drifting into works-based righteousness?
- concerns about ideology?
- something else entirely?
I recently explored this topic in the final part of a video series I’ve been working on, and it led to some interesting insights. For anyone who wants to see how I approached the question, I've linked the video below. But the main purpose of this post is to hear your theological perspective and learn from the broader Christian community here.
Video link: Login to view embedded media
Looking forward to a respectful, Christ-centered discussion.
Grace and peace.
God be gracious and bless us and let Your face shed its light upon us.” So begins Psalm 68, often said in the Daily Office, or Breviary, at the start of the day. In St. John’s Gospel, Philip says to Jesus, “show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Jesus responds, “Philip, to have seen Me is to have seen the Father.” The light shining from the face of Christ is the light of the Father. The blessing of seeing the face of Christ is the gift we will soon celebrate at Christmas: God has become man, and we can look upon Him.
Marian Consecration is like Baptism in that it’s a one-time deal. Once Mary’s, you’re totally Mary’s. However, there are various times during the liturgical year and sacramental life that we renew our baptismal promises, in particular during the Easter Vigil. It should be the same for Marian Consecration—we should have a renewal of sorts that we do every year to remember that we are, indeed, hers.
My question remains the same. With Jesus, it is more than Judah and the rest of the brethren of the house of Israel. It is the entire world that has been broken free of the rule of the elohim over the nations, returning to God's Will, the Kingdom. No longer is God's piece of real estate in a world of nations, formed after Babel, relevant other than as capital of the new world. The Kingdom, which covers all, is the new promised land.
Trump hasn't been implicated in this has he? Regarding Trumps relation to the truth, I've known that it is self-serving since February 2017 and he showed his morals in the Access Hollywood tapes.The source stated that Bradley said this.
We will just have to wait and see. But already we have seen the lies from legacy media accusing Hegseth or ordering the killing and commiting war crimes. Extreme bias and designed to undermine Trump. So I will not trust anything that is said until it is confirmed.
Neither has those with TDS who are making all these claims lol. Its the same MO as all the other fake news they have claimed from so called anonomous sources who they never name.
Even doctoring other peoples words to change what they have said. Just because they hate Trump and his admin so much. Or hiding the evidence because it contradicts their poisonous narrative against Trump.
Interesting detail...
ASK AI this in any browser:
"what are the top 3 Christian denominations holding to sola scriptura testing of all doctrine and having a single set of administrators with one single set of official doctrines and having no autonomous subgroups included in the total membership"
<<I am excluding autonomous subgroups because by definition , autonomy does not preserve unity in doctrine so does not represent a single set of church teaching as being held by all the group>>
Yes, only now, unlike the past five decades.
![]()
Former Senior DEA Official Indicted For Conspiring To Provide Material Support To A Foreign Terrorist Organization
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton, and Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), Terrance C. Cole, announced today the unsealing of an Indictment charging PAUL CAMPO and ROBERT SENSI with narcoterrorism, terrorism, narcotics...www.justice.gov
With all of the money the cartels pulled in I am concerned they now have a solid foothold in the United States.
No doubt Daytime TV news announcer, multiple divorcee, alcohol enthusiast and inveterate adulterer felt threatened by the up and down bobbing motion of the floundering ex sailors.Well, I'd say that the survivors were 'actively trying' not to drown. Just make a mental note that the orders were not 'prevent these drugs from getting to the US'. It was literally 'kill them all'. That's the position you have to square with your conscience.
The holy of holies was not anointed, and the kingdom was not established, so your view is missing alot of context, the anointing of the holy of holies and the age of righteousness are the climax of the second 70 weeks and the necessity for the prophecy to be fulfilled.It only had one fulfillment and ended 70-73 AD. The masoretic is probably the least closest to the original compared to the LXX too.
In another post you accused me of lying for making things up, in my last response part of it was made up as comedic value.If this is the case then you have just admitted that humans can gain knowledge through direct experiences of nature and reality.
Because I I keep saying knowledge does not work that way. Nor does finding tools in a location mean that this was the only method. We are talking nearly 5,000 years of different people using the quarry. So we will find all sorts of different methods in the one place from different levels of knowledge.
Knowledge is not a case of using just one method. Methods may overlap, come and then disappear and are discovered again. It may be the dolomite pounders were from a later or earlier people and that some earlier culture softened stone. They tried to copy the work with pounders.
Or it may be that both methods were used at the same time. The weakening or softening of stone used for the major works and the pounders for finer work in smothing the work.
But the fact is for example that studies have shown that the signatures in the stone at the unfinished obelisk were not made by small dolomite pounders. Another method or methods were used. One method showing a particular pattern like the granite was scooped out. So already we see the dolomite pounders orthodoxy undermined by the evidence that only one method was used.
There you go. This shows they at least were thinking along those lines.
But we don't know how they were used. It may have been that they used them in conjunction with the pyramid chambers where this actually is proven to have an effect on the brain.
But the point is the ancient Egyptians were thinking and believing at this level. Thinking about expanding the mind and the mind and body mystery we humans have been contemplating for millenia.
Skeptics just dismiss it all as psuedoscience. But this type of science is coming back into mainstream thinking. So it may well be that the ancients were already there and had found some way through direct experiences and altering mind states or psychical states.
This is very different from the Koran reporting that Alexander the Great watched the sun sink into a mud puddle of unspecified geographic location. (The puddle should be easy to discover. Given that the sun is a million times the diameter of the Earth, It would have to be a REALLY big puddle.)
Now, this isn't meant as a criticism of the Trump administration. They're exploring the legality of denaturalization, and that's fine. I would just hope that they run into a hard legal wall.
I've been reading lately about suggestions to denaturalize legal immigrants. The Trump administration has already been working on revoking green cards and deporting legal immigrants in certain cases. I'd like to know what people around here thing about this, and specifically how far the government should be able to go.
Should the government be able to denaturalize legal immigrants if they've committed crimes in the US? Or for any reason at all? For that matter, should the government be able to revoke the citizenship of citizens born in the US and deport them? Although discussion of babies born in the US of illegal immigrants would deserve another thread, I wouldn't consider it to be off topic here.
Personally, I am currently against denaturalization unless fraud was committed during the application process (as per 8 U.S.C. Section 1451). As far as I'm concerned, once you're a citizen, you remain a citizen unless you voluntarily move out and revoke your citizenship.
Now, this isn't meant as a criticism of the Trump administration. They're exploring the legality of denaturalization, and that's fine. I would just hope that they run into a hard legal wall.