Flat or round earth -The final experiment.
- Conspiracy Theories
- 2916 Replies
See post #2,054 (Page 103) of this thread.No, link please.
While you're there, read post 2,044 and post 2,050 as well.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
See post #2,054 (Page 103) of this thread.No, link please.
We do not write the Ten Commandments - we obey them.
God is the one that said He rested and that He made the Sabbath binding on all mankind at the Gen 2:2-3 creation event.
there are universal aspects of the law that even if unwritten, stand true. Being a servant of God demands not to take his name in vain, or have other gods, or graven images. This is innate through a monotheistic relationship and although just as valuable today as it ever was has less meaning because polythesim is far less practices today. Monotheistic practices needed to be emphasized at the time of Moses and the 10 commandments acted as a polemic of its time to emphasises monotheistic practices and broad pillars or civil that were very much unpopular values of surrounding cultures.The New Covenant of Heb 8 comes from Jer 31:31-34 where we find the commandments of God as known in the OT - written on the heart.
BOTH covenants have "do not take God's name in vain" -- BOTH have the TEN - - BOTH have Lev 19:18 "Love your neighbor as yourself".
The OLD Covenant is of the form "obey and live" as see was the case for mankind in Gen 2.
But after the fall of man -- only the NEW Covenant serves as the way to eternal life - starting with the fall of Adam and ever since,
Even NT writers affirm this
So?Um...a quick check shows that lignite dates from 60 million years ago.
I have no horse in race for whether you or @timewerx are correct about Jesus and Proverbs being in contradiction. I cannot see any way in which this might effect my worldview, or daily life. I do have an interst in the validity of the associated arguments as illustrations of flawed logic, etc.My take is that Proverbs might say wealth can be good, but keep it in its proper place. This would not be a contradiction, or else why would Jesus say to give the rich man's wealth to the poor? If the wealth is really wrong, He could say burn it up and bury what is left.
The fact that you get upset at my acceptance of faith is evidence in and of itself. If atheism is true, why is there any issue with me choosing to believe in things because I want them to be true? Why should I care about silly little things like what can be proven, when at the end of the day it really makes no difference? If faith improves my life, why would I not embrace faith? To be left with existential angst in an uncaring universe for my short miserable life? You cite ethics, but you have no basis for any sort of ethical high horse since in your view it can only be a matter of personal preference with no reason to abide by ethical principles so long as they aren't convenient.I've already expressed my views about faith. Forum rules forbid me from defending those views. But leaving your comments unanswered is more of a load on my ehtical drives than breaching those rules. Your faith position is a cop out to justify believing in something for which there is no substantive evidence, but which you wish to believe because . . . . . . you wish to believe it. To avoid an infinite regress of this discussion I am placing you on Ignore until I've, more or less, forgotten what it was about. Should take about a month. See you on the other side.
But that isn't actually condemning them to hell. As has been said many times on this thread, only God can do that. We can say that in God's sight, all human beings are sinners, and as such deserve only judgment from God, so we need a Saviour."No. First, human beings do not have the power to assign anyone to Hell."
But people have the capability to condemn people to Hell. They can do this by saying, "You are going to Hell."
It has been interesting. I hope we will meet again.You are missing the point Jerry.
This has nothing to do with using angels as opposed to telling someone something himself.
God's angels are his messengers. He uses them.
Prophets are also messengers. God used them.
Jesus is God's chief messenger. God uses him.
The disciples are Jesus messengers. He uses them.
Do you not get the picture?
Jesus chooses to use people to help others come to know the truth.
That is why he sends them, That is why he appointed elders in the congregations... gifts in men - shepherds, teachers, etc.
Matthew 24:14; Matthew 24:45; Matthew 28:18-20; Ephesians 4:8-11; Hebrews 13:17
Why did Jesus command his followers to stay in Jerusalem before he ascended?
Acts 1:1, 2
Acts 1:8
But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.’
Read that carefully Jerry, along with the previous verses.
Ask yourself... Why would Jesus appoint men to preach the gospel of the kingdom throughout all the earth... fill them with holy spirit so that they can do it... and increase the workers of the harvest...
Only to then send angels to people?
Does that seem like commonsense to you Jerry?
He might as well had not appointed the men. Who needs them when angels can do the job.. right.
Think about it. What purpose is there in making disciples by means of the preaching of the gospel?
And the words of Jesus and of the apostles. J 3:16 is a verse being displayed almost everywhere and still so many Christians do not seem to know it.The prophesies make clear the WORLD was always the plan.
Neiter am I! I jist hype yuo didmt take any of fence, as nun was intebted.Condistering the fcat that I'n the worl's best ty;pst, that hardly seams likey, does it?
Last I heard Gutfeld has tons of viewers.And I am sure the liberals will blame Trump too as an "attack on free speach." But, in reality, people are just getting their entertainment and news sources elsewhere like how the internet shorts replaced the paper newspaper.