I find Dr John Lennox pretty good at explaining biblical truth and applying them to real life. Many say C.S Lewis.
Weirdly enough I like Jordan Peterson's psychological explanations of the bible truths even though theres questions about his Christianity.
He mentions that all literature throughout time, the great philosophers and canons of western thought are all trying to get to the truth. But the bible was the original truth and first book that all truths stem from. The precondition for truth itself. Quite an expansive view but very true.
But choose wisely. You don't have to support the entire philsophy of any specific author. Just pull out what you think makes sense as per the bible. I think Peterson gives more an overview and perspective of Christian belief as a human enterprise. Which can help get different perspectives.
I think its important to know all perspectives so that it can show the bible and its truth in light of other ideas and philosophies. Like Peterson mentions that we can sample texts from the corpus of all texts to get different views on what truth is. Or what its all about.
But in doing so we begin to see a pattern that traces back to the bible which is the precondition of truth. Without it all other philsophy would not make sense.
A story:
I was taking a logic curriculum in college that required an early survey of philosophy course that was taught by the dean of the philosophy department. I signed up for the course and quickly learned that I was the only student enrolled. That would mean the offer would be withdrawn, but it best fit my intended schedule to take it that semester so I went to the professor, Dr Goldstein, to see if I could take it by independent study and testing,
"No," Goldstein said firmly, it was a course that must be taught by lecture. So, I said something about being disappointed that it would not be taught that semester. "Oh, I'm teaching it," he said. Even if to only one student, he was going to teach it. By lecture. We held the first couple of sessions in a classroom, just him and me. Then we mutually agreed that was dumb, so I just went to his office.
In that private setting, we learned we were both Christian, which rather surprised me, given his name. As it turned out, he had been born and raised Jewish. But he'd become disillusioned by Judaism and turned to atheism. But he had found atheism philosophically unsatisfying and had spent more than a decade traveling the world and investigation all sorts of religions.
Eventually, he looked into Christianity, which he'd previously avoided because he'd "heard enough" about Christianity just being in the US. But it hadn't taken him very much study into the New Testament to realize...there it was. There it had been all along.
So, that "survey of philosophy" course actually turned into "the ways all the other philosophies get it wrong."