"Oil for the lamps" and "priestly garments" (A look at Exodus 27:20-30:10)

PARASHA: “Tetsaveh” (you shall command) EXODUS 27:20-30


In this parashah, we will see the preparation of the Menorah, and the clothing of the priests. The study starts out with preparing olive oil to fill the lamps of the Menorah, The Torah tells us that it was a “permanent light” (Ner Tamid). It would be the only light outside of the “Kadosh Kedoshim” (The HOLY of Holies) where the “Shekinah” illuminated that small area where the only article was the “Aron Ha Kodesh” (The Ark of the Covenant.

The first theme is “Light” and this would be in the form of the Menorah. But why do we associate “light” with “God?” One reason is that “light” is not so much an object we can touch. One could call “light” an essence. We can’t see “light” yet we can see the reaction when light beams hit an object.

Go inside a dark, dusty room and turn on a flashlight and you might say “See, I see a beam of light!” yet what we are seeing is “light particles reflecting against dust particles” so, we are seeing the particles of dust, which “are” objects reacting to the “light particles” which are invisible. Shine a flashlight inside a dark yet clean room, and you will see a circle of light on the wall. You see the light reflected against the wall, not the light itself. Light beams or rays are invisible, yet objects will react to those same light beams.

God is invisible in His pure form, yet He radiates light, and we as believers reflect HIS light in our lives as believers, in the forms of mitzvoth (good works) our changed characters and personalities, and how we look at the world and the material things in the world. There are so many scriptures about light and how we as believers should “walk in the light, as HE is in the light” Let HIS light be seen in us at all times.

Verse 20 states; “And thou shalt command the children of Israel that they bring unto thee pure olive oil beaten for the light, to cause a lamp to burn continually.”

In the original Hebrew, this verse has 15 words. The word “Shemen” (oil) is the “eighth” word. It is the “middle word” with 7 words before and after. Is this coincidence? from the word “Shemen” we get “Shemini” (eighth). What does the number 8 symbolize? It symbolizes a “New Beginning.”

This is a “New Beginning” after their slavery in Egypt. While in Egypt, Pharaoh symbolized the “light of Ra!” yet now, the “light of Elohim” would be the light of “Yeshuah” (OR YESHUAH) the Light of Salvation. The instrument of light would be the Menorah, which would hold the “shemen” the “Olive Oil.”

The “Ner Tamid” (eternal Light) also reminds us of Isaiah 60:19 which states; …YHVH shall be unto thee an everlasting light, and thy God thy glory”

The Menorah was “outside” the curtain, yet still inside the tabernacle. In the same room with the Menorah was the Table of Shewbread, where the 12 loaves of bread were, and the Table of Incense. Here we have a three-fold symbolism of Messiah Yeshua.

The table of Shew Bread, “Yeshua HaLechem Chaim” (Yeshua the Bread of Life) and the incense altar, where our “Prayers go upward to heaven” and where “Yeshua intercedes on our behalf. The Menorah is “Yeshua HaOr Olam v'ha Or Tamid” (Yeshua the Light of the World and the Eternal Light.

The Menorah was to burn all night, and in the morning, the high priest (Aaron) would come in to trim the wicks and prepare the Menorah for the evening lighting. The Menorah was all about “Light” in the words “from Morning to evening” (the lamps of the Menorah were to burn” we can see the Hebrew word “Ad” (ayin and dalet)

The word “Ad “means “witness” during the evening, the Shekinah Elohim was the outside light, while the lamps were the inside lights. During the day, the Shenika glory which was above the Mercy Seat of the Aron Ha Kodesh (Ark of the Covenant) was the inner light of the Mishkan (Tabernacle).

There is a difference between light and darkness, Good and Evil, Holiness, and Sin, and the lost and the saved. The olive oil in the lamps symbolizes the anointing of the Holy Spirit, which the wicks can symbolize every believer. If we are to burn bright, we must be in constant contact with the oil, if not, we will “burn out”

In pagan cultures, darkness was when evil came about, demons, etc. In ancient Egypt, their god “Ra” went to sleep at night, so the Egyptians were without protection against the “evils of the night”. Those who ventured out usually took a cat with them, symbolizing “Bastet” the goddess of the night, who would protect the person against “evil”. Wow, what if the cat saw a mouse or a dog, and....ran off? Oh, well.

The Menorah that burned during the night symbolized “Elohim” who would be the “light in the evening” as well as in the day. The light was inside the tabernacle, and also, outside in the form of the “column of Fire” We are blessed by the presence of the Ruach HaKodesh (The Holy Spirit) at all times, in the day and during the night, inside and out, the believer is NEVER alone, the Light of G-d is forever with us.

The Menorah had seven branches, it was made of pure gold, the middle branch was called the “Shamash” or the “helper”. “Seven” is the perfect number of holiness. “Six” branches (six is the number of mankind) are on either side of the Shamash, three on the right and three on the left. Mankind needs the presence of Yeshua, to fulfill his destiny, to get right again, into a right relationship with his creator through Yeshua, through the “New birth” (John 3:3).

The wicks are “all of us” and the oil that goes into the lamps,is the “Holy Spirit” we need to be in continuous contact and communion with the Ruach HaKodesh, so that our lamps will “shine brightly” continuously, after all, Yeshua said to his followers, “Ye are the Light of the world” (Atem ha Orot ha olam). Israel's purpose was to be the “light to the Gentiles” to go into the world and teach the pagan peoples who worshipped idols, that there was only ONE GOD, to bring the Torah to the world.

This is what happened during the “scattering” of the tribes of Israel to the nations, now, there are “Y'hudim” in all nations, and in all nations, there are many who worship our LORD and God. Even among the Jewish peoples of the world, there are many Messianic believers who embrace Yeshua HaMashiach.

The next chapter talks about the vestments of the priests. Clothing has always been a thing of importance. The world says, “according to how a person dresses, that person IS.” A “bum” or “hobo” (a word of the 1930s), usually has dirty and torn clothes, unkempt hair, and a scraggly beard, HOWEVER, that “bum” or “hobo” might be a “born again believer” who is going through hard times, maybe that person has fallen out of fellowship with the LORD.

I think that everyone has his or her favorite “Super Hero” like Superman, Batman, The Flash, etc…All these superheroes wear special clothing, and uniforms, which make them “stand out” from the regular crowd. Their mission is to protect “Joe Citizen” and uplift honor and the law. The Cohenim were the same, their “special clothing” lifted them “above the rest” as “reps for God” going on “their behalf” before a righteous and holy God.

Many ask what was the first “clothing” like. How were Adam and Eve dressed? If we go back to Genesis, we can get an idea and answer that question to the best of our ability. “And they were both naked, the man and his wife, yet they were not ashamed; Gen 2:25. This verse is insinuating that there IS SHAME connected to nakedness, yet, Adam and Eve did not have any physical clothing at that time. This was before their sin. But was there something that covered their bodies? If we remember, Moshe was with the LORD for 40 days and nights. When he came down from Mt. Sinai, he was “aglow” His was shining with the Ruach HaKodesh. Could that be the case with Adam and Chavah?

Many believe that they were covered with a “skin of light” (play on words) Since these two Hebrew words are the same pronunciation; “OR” yet the first letters are different. “Light” is spelled with an “Aleph” which symbolizes the spiritual essence of Adonai (Aleph, Vav, Resh)

The other word “OR” (skin) is spelled with an “Ayin” (Ayin, Vav, Resh) . The letter “Ayin” symbolizes, the “eye” or “insight” “Skin” is something we can “see” Our souls/spirits are inside our bodies, and our bodies are covered with “skin” on the outside. So the “light” covered the “skin” meaning the oneness in the relationship with the Creator.

However, after the sin of Adam and Chavah, we read the verse; “Then the eyes of both of them were opened and they knew that they were naked” (Gen 3:7) …” I was afraid because I was naked so I hid myself (Adam) Gen 3:10.

Here we can relate “nakedness” with “fear” yet not before, only NOW. How is it that NOW they realized that they were naked? It was because the covering of light was lifted up, and taken away from their bodies, leaving them only with their “skin”. “Nakedness” And “shame/fear = broken relationship with the Creator!

Adonai made them new clothing, an “animal skin covering” which required the sacrifice and death of an innocent animal. This first material clothing symbolizes our Messiah who died and not only “covered” our sins, but completely “atoned for” them. With physical clothing, Adam and Eve could now have fellowship with the creator again. YHVH looking down at them and seeing the animal skin covering would think of the future covenant of blood of Yeshua.

When my family went to worship at our congregation, we all put on our suit and ties, and mom wore her best dress. Yet today, some come to synagogue or church dressed as if they were going on a walk in the park, or to the beach. I mean, God still sees our hearts, even if we wear a sport shirt or long sleeve shirt with a suit and tie, BUT... if we are going to meet with the KING of Kings, shouldn't we wear our BEST? What would you wear if the president of your nation invited you to his house?


The completely white tunic was worn on Yom Kippur, when the Cohen Gadol would enter the “Holy of Holies” to meet with YHVH. Perhaps this completely white tunic reminds us of the white glowing light that must of covered the bodies of Adam and Eve before their sin. We are also reminded that the clothing of Yeshua was “glowing white” when He was on Mt. Tabor, when he met with Moshe and Eliyahu. There the three represented the whole Torah! Moshe, the Torah, Eliyahu, the Prophets, and Yeshua, the Brit HaDashah, “The New Covenant”

As you read the parashah chapters and verses, we see the tunic/robe, bonnet, ephod, breastplate, etc., all meaningful. The onyx stones on the priests’ shoulders had the names of the tribes of Israel engraved, the priest would “shoulder the burden” of the nation, taking the animal sacrifices (that represented Yeshua's death) would intercede before YHVH on the nation's behalf. Now, Yeshua intercedes before the Father on our behalf with his “once only” death/sacrifice for all sin for ALL time.

The breastplate would have 12 stones engraved with the names of the tribes of Israel, “Israel was/is next to YHVH's heart! As we are too, since we are all part of the commonwealth of Israel. Two interesting things are the “Urim and Thumim” no one knows exactly what they were, but there are suggestions, they might have been two stones that lit up and glowed when the priest would ask YHVH a question, the “Urim and Thumim' (Lights and perfections) were placed under the breastplate. When the priest went before YHVH seeking an answer to some judgment concerning the people, the stones would light up “illuminating” the priest with perhaps special wisdom from God, and it would be a “Perfect” response from God.

Some say that there was a parchment with the most sacred name of God (Y H V H) on it, and placed inside the breastplate, and then, some think, that the letters of the names of the tribes of Israel that were engraved on the stones, would glow. The priest under the anointing of the Spirit of God, would then put the letters together and would “read” God's answer. But these are just ideas, nothing 100% certain. In heaven, we will discover what the “Urim and Thumim were/are! “

Today, we have the Word of God. YHVH speaks to us through his written Word, but also, through dreams, at times, through other people who are very sensitive to the Holy Spirit. Sometimes, YHVH conveys messages through events in our lives. If we look back on our lives, we can see that YHVH has been right there working and preparing events/people to bring us to where we are now.

In chapter 29, we have the anointing/dedication of Aaron and his sons for the ministry. The sacrifices were a bullock and two rams, unleavened bread with olive oil. All these point to Yeshua, these were clean animals, whose blood symbolizes the blood of our Messiah, just like the unleavened bread, “Yeshua the Bread of Life” and the oil, the “Ruach HaKodesh” a little bit of the blood was placed on Aaron's right ear lobe, right thumb, and on the right toe, the same was done to his sons. What does this symbolize? We could say that as priests, “May they always HEAR, LISTEN TO the voice of God, that they might DO his will, and follow his commandments, and WALK in HIS footsteps, FOLLOWING the path of Torah.

This would be the same expectation of ministers who are anointed as rabbis, chaplains, pastors, priests, etc. that they might always listen to the voice of God, and follow/do his will through his Word, to serve those who are placed under their leadership. We don't use blood today, but we do use anointing oil, so, the next time you might be called to anoint a minister, place some anointing oil on the right ear lobe, on the right thumb, and the right toe, (or on top of the shoe) for those that don't wear sandals.

Chapter 30 talks about the altar of incense, which was made of [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]tim wood overlaid with gold, again, the humanity of Yeshua and the purity of HIM who is God. On this altar, the incense was burned, symbolizing our prayers that go up to YHVH as a sweet savor.

A final thought on “clothing” let us “clothe” ourselves in the Spirit of God so that we might be spiritually controlled. Just as the Ark of the Covenant was “clothed” inside and out by pure gold, we should also be “clothed” inside and out with vestments that are God-honoring.


Shalom,

Ben Avraham

Does Good or Evil attach to physical "things", or Relics?

In other traditions there is a concept that physical things can have good or evil attached to them. In Catholicism and Orthodoxy I think of Relics - often referred to as having some sort of "power".

This isn't a fair representation of how Catholics or Orthodox think of relics. It's more a misunderstanding or misrepresentation.

Where does Lutheranism land on all this "stuff"?

Most Lutheran churches do not have relics. Some in Scandinavia do, if they are historic in nature.

Lutheran theology is sacramental, so Lutherans do believe God's grace is mediated through certain physical means, called sacraments, such as Baptism and Communion.
Upvote 0

Evidence Noah's Biblical Flood Happened, Says Robert Ballard

First world was created for the angels dominion... Just as the animals of this creation were designed for Adam's dominion.

When Adam fell? Animals were transformed, as well as plant life.
The power of God to transform animals was highlighted with the serpent when God transformed it from being a creature of great beauty into a frightening, degraded manifestation .... Also, thorns and thistles began popping up. As well as some animals began to eat other animals as prey.

Likewise?... when Satan fell? The animals of that prehistoric angelic kingdom also fell. Transforming animals into having some evil looking creatures.. Flesh eaters like raptors and T-Rex, became representative in their function of Satan and aggressive fallen angels, devouring more peaceful creatures they could prey upon.

Both ours and the prehistoric creations were parallel in principle. Yet, different. Different to suite the ones who God had placed in positions of dominion over their own world.

grace and peace ......................
You have no Biblical evidence that animals existed on the earth of Genesis 1:1
Upvote 0

puzzling that a man can preach and ruin lives .

and he is manifesting great powers. He repents and in the future is using the same tactics to get wealth. He also has a heretical biblically incorrect teaching pattern often. But my thoughts keep coming back---he causes 1,000s to fall under his power? How can this be?

Who exactly are you talking about?
Upvote 0

Watching Church Online In Lieu Of Attending In Person

I dont go to church either. I have gone to several churches and none of which I would go back to because of various reasons. I watch and do Church and Bible study at home and I probally do more than I would guess that most Church going christians do since I dont watch tv except the news and some pure flix and the rest of the time its Bible teaching of some kind going on. I dont know if I will attempt to go to a church no more because the ones I have gone to were so seriously messed up and I dont want to risk going back to another one at least for now.
Upvote 0

The Angel of The Lord and Jesus Christ (Trinitarianism in the OT)

[Edit: I've left the website but feel free to continue contributing to the threads I've made. Iron sharpens iron. Isaiah 1:18.]
I have spent a bunch of time compiling many of the passages that speak about The Angel of The Lord. Reading these has left me in awe many times and I'm so grateful that our Lord God Christ is shown so clearly. These are all of the passages that through Bible Dictionaries and cross referencing I have been able to find. It has been a bit hard because due to the nature of The Angel of The Lord (pre-incarnate Christ) some are deductive and it's not just listing Scripture where it's immediately overtly explicit. Though it is explicit but as you will see words like "an Angel of The Lord" do not inherently mean "The Angel of The Lord", though some "an Angel of The Lord" references are referencing The Angel of The Lord (who is God). I figured I would share some of my study notes as well as the list of scriptures as I have benefited greatly from it and I thought maybe it might help someone else either currently or in the future. Also if I have missed any I would be tremendously grateful if you could post them as personally this subject is of immense importance and value to me. I really didn't expect it to be a mammoth of a task, I only thought there were some Christophanies. I had no idea there were so many. It was a very welcome, great and awesome surprise.

The references to arguments against "accretion" will become clear in the study notes I post in the second post of this thread. It had to do with something I came across while researching that is quite honestly in my opinion, obscene and insane argumentation that makes little sense in light of Christ. If you're just looking for the passages then please ignore them.

The List does not reference the full chapters in which He is mentioned. So when reading specific references in order to get the context of the Christophanies/Theophanies it would be best if you read the surrounding verses or chapter that is listed. Or not, do whatever you want xD. The list itself also has the specific names that are referencing the being of The Angel of The Lord. All research was done with the NASB1995 and therefore the references and language used will be congruent with that specific translation. God bless you all and all glory to our awesome and loving Lord God. I pray that this subject of the awesome gift that is The Scriptures strengthens your faith and reverence for God as it did mine.


The Angel of The Lord Passages

Genesis 16:7, 9, 10, 11 (The Angel of The Lord)

Genesis 17:1 (The Lord)

Genesis 18:1 (The Lord)

Genesis 21:17 (The Angel of God) [Here God hears and the Angel of God responds, which again argues against an accretion (from literally Genesis it argues against it lol)]

Genesis 22:11, 15 (The Angel of The Lord) [Genesis 22:12 He calls Himself God]

Genesis 31:11-13 (The Angel of God) [He calls Himself God here again]

Exodus 3:2-6 (The Angel of The Lord) [He Calls Himself God here again]

Exodus 14:19 (The Angel of God)

Exodus 13:21 (The Lord, though this is an Angel according to Numbers 20:16, so the same being)

Exodus 14:19 (The angel of God, Cross reference: Ex 13:21, Num 20:16, 1 Cor 10:1-4)

Exodus 23:20-21 (An Angel, but “my name is in Him”)

Exodus 23:20-23 (an Angel, My Angel)

Exodus 32:34 (My Angel)

Numbers 22: 22-27, 31-35 (The Angel of The Lord)

Joshua 5:13-15 (Commander of The Army of The Lord)

Judges 2:1, 4 (The Angel of The Lord)

Judges 5:23 (the angel of the Lord)

Judges 6:11-12, 21-22 (The Angel of The Lord)

Judges 6:20 (The Angel of God)

Judges 13:3, 13, 15-18, 20-21 (The Angel of The Lord)

Judges 13:6, 18 (Man of God, Manoah was confused as evidenced by 13:16) [Isa 9:6 cross reference to the name which prophesies about our Saviour: Wonderful]

Judges 13:9 (The Angel of God)

2 Samuel 24:16 (the angel of the Lord)

1 Kings 19:17 (The angel of the Lord)

2 Kings 1:3 (the angel of the Lord)

2 Kings 1:15 (The angel of the Lord)

2 Kings 19:35 (the Angel of The Lord)

1 Chronicles 21:12, 15, 16, 18, 27, 30 (the angel of the Lord, v.27 the angel)

2 Chronicles 32:21 (an angel, it’s The Angel of The Lord: 2 Kings 19:35)

Isaiah 37:36 (the angel of the Lord)

Isaiah 63:9 (the angel of His presence)

Zechariah 1:11-12 (The Angel of The Lord) (v.12 distinctly Trinitarian like Christ’s baptism and His prayers, The Angel of The Lord who is Elohim asks Elohim a question)

Zechariah 3:1, 5-7 (The Angel of The Lord) (v.7 is Trinitarian as The angel of The Lord who is Elohim speaks for Elohim as if He is distinct)

Zechariah 12:8 (The Angel of The Lord) [Wow what an awesome prophecy] [This also proves that the Israelites saw Him as distinct, just like they did in judges with Manoah. So it can’t be argued as an accretion]


Potential passages

Genesis 24:7 (His Angel, the Angel is being sent from God. The Son was sent too.)

Genesis 32:30 (Genesis 32:29 cross reference Judges 13:18? “Why do you ask my name?”)

Genesis 48:15-16 (The Angel is equated with God “Redeemed him from all evil”)

Numbers 20:16 (The Angel here is the being who was called the Lord in Exodus 13:21)

Daniel 3:25

Daniel 6:22


Mentions of The Angel of The Lord but not Christophanies/Theophanies

Psalm 34:7 (The angel of the Lord)

Psalm 35:5 (the angel of the Lord)

Psalm 35:6 (the angel of The Lord)


Miscellaneous
1 Corinthians 10:1-4 [Paul states here explicitly that the being who followed the Israelites in Exodus was Christ]
  • V. 1 reference b (Exodus 13:21)
  • V. 4 reference a (Exodus 17:6)
I strongly suggest you the book "Angelomorphic Christology" by Charles A. Gieschen
Upvote 0

Florida's Largest School District Rejects the Sex Ed Texts it Approved 3 Months Ago

There is something called "abstinence education" that was used when my daughter was in school. Her objection was that it promulgated misinformation about effectiveness of birth control, etc. to prevent sexual activity.

Her religious training always taught her it is wrong to lie and deceive, even in order to obtain good outcome.

She also said because kids knew they were being lied to they rejected even the good things about the program.
Upvote 0

Education Under God...Reading is Fundamental

Romans 13:1 says “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” Some may find it odd that the topic of God and education would begin with a Verse having to do with the governing authorities, but in countries like the U.S., it appears that some government authorities have taken an interest in what is made available and what is taught in schools and colleges. Given the coverage of the quest by certain governing jurisdictions to withhold certain facts and ideas, may compel us to ask if that serves God’s purpose.

The earliest incidence of God withholding knowledge is found in Genesis when He forbade Adam and Eve to eat from the Tree of Good and Evil. To the extent we’re are aloud under Isaiah 1:18, we might reason that God may have had no problem with them knowing what good is, but He may have had a problem with their knowing what evil is. But after they acquired that knowledge from eating the forbidden fruit, it would seem, from reading the New Testament, that God resolved that it is better that people know what both good and evil are, that they may hopefully strive for what is good, than for them to know only what it is to be good. Seems that to know what one is, and not the other as well, is to only know the geographic term “longitude” without knowing what “latitude” is, causing one to drift toward unchartered waters having evil perils that await.

A reading of the New Testament compels one to surmise that as far as God is concerned there are two types of education toward righteousness: One type involves knowing what God is in terms of what He expects from us, and the other is knowing what God isn’t and what He regards as sinful. One can get a better understanding of what God wants from us if we also know what He doesn’t want from us.

To wit, 1 Thessalonians 5:21 says to test everything and hold fast what is good. Well, it would seem that if you are not aware of all the variables associated with good and evil, how would you know what to test and how to test it? And it would seem that testing anything involves some degree of exposure to the subject matter, but, in light of the testing itself, that may not necessarily mean that such exposure causes one to turn away from God and His precepts. To learn about something is not the same as to subscribe to it. In our quest to test things in terms of whether they stand for God, we may learn abut things that fall under the sins of evil that God abhors, but that doesn’t mean we would turn away from God and become evil ourselves.

Some, perhaps like the governing authorities who are busy purging books from school libraries and forbidding the teachings of certain things in schools and colleges, may believe that a temptation will be formed and exist to lore people toward the sins they learn about. If so, are they really governing under God? Did God decree that it is a sin to learn OF certain things, as opposed to LEARNING certain things? If so, then how are we to test things?

Some might say, ‘Leave it up to us who govern under God, to discern what is good and what is evil, and to enact laws that shield you from what we the government believe to be evil; and this we will do when you vote for us.” But does a passage like 1 Thessalonians 5:21 say something like, ‘You who govern, test everything for the people’? The Bible strongly implies that the responsibility of knowing what is right and wrong is up to each individual. Galatians 6: 4-5 says to “let each one test his own work...For each will have to bear his own load.”

Two things to share with you. One of these things is brought up in light of governing jurisdictions in the U.S. who are at least considering the banning of certain math books, if they haven’t been already banned: Acts 7:22 says that Moses “was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds.” Commentators have written that the things that Moses was taught by the Egyptians included mathematics. Were those Egyptians concerned with what Moses would do with what they teach him? Did those Egyptians consult their Pharoah or those who worked for him before teaching Moses certain things?

And, as far as our God is concerned, Daniel 1:17 says “God gave [Daniel] learning and skill in ALL LITERATURE and wisdom, and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams.” ALL LITERATURE, get it? ‘Huckleberry Finn,’ anyone? I understand that Huckleberry Finn is one of the books being considered for banning in certain schools where the government here in the U.S. is keeping a close watch on what books are in school libraries. Is that a government under God? Would God approve of that?

Prayer and Predestination

Does prayer help you get what you need, or is it merely a confirmation to God of how He has predestined you? John 15:7 says “If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you.”
Abiding in the Lord means you've submitted yourself to the Lord to let His Holy Spirit work in you to be come Christlike in mind, heart and action. Letting His word abide in you means you're conforming to his ways and commands.

This result in being so in tune with Him, that you end up praying His will and because it's His will, it will be done for you.
Upvote 0

How Blessed Carlo Acutis changed his mother’s life forever

I need to read the book about him. I really don’t know that much about him.
He was very much into the sacrament.
His mom was agnostic/atheist?
He did not come into the world of a family of faith but [and here's where I forget details] he had graces from the Lord and from a young un he craved the Church/Lord/Eucharist.

Which is why he studied and recorded all the miracles of the Eucharist.
  • Informative
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

‘A spiritual war’: James O’Keefe points to Sacred Heart of Jesus in fiery CPAC speech

After his spiritual remarks, O'Keefe brought a Pfizer whistleblower on stage to share her story of exposing corruption.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) –– Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe delivered remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) today and told the audience that we are going through “a spiritual war… a fight of good and evil,” before bringing a Pfizer whistleblower on stage with him to have her share her story.

He made the remarks about the spiritual battle while pointing to a still-shot of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts of Jesus and Mary, which were hanging in the restaurant where his outlet recorded a video of a Pfizer employee admitting the pharmaceutical giant engages in the “directed evolution” of viruses.

Continued below.

Zero elite press coverage of ‘heresy’ accusations against an American cardinal?

The question at the heart of this week’s “Crossroads” podcast (click here to tune that in) was not whether Springfield (Ill.) Bishop Thomas Paprocki was on target with his First Things essay that all but accused San Diego Cardinal Robert McElroy of heresy.

The question was not whether Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich of Luxembourg — a strategic leader in the Vatican’s Synod on Synodality — was right when he said the church's teaching on homosexuality are “no longer correct,” and added, “I think it is time for a fundamental revision of the doctrine."

The question was not whether Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich was correct when he suggested, in print, that priests should absolve Catholics who come to Confession, allowing them to receive Holy Communion, even if these individuals refuse to repent of behaviors that Catholic doctrine insists are sin.

The question was not what Pope Francis meant when he told bishops in the Congo, “Always. Always forgive in the Sacrament of Reconciliation” — even if there is confusion about whether penitents are repenting of their sins or not.

Continued below.

Pope’s Angelus for the Second Sunday of Lent: ‘Christ Is the Pillar of Fire for the People in the Wilderness’

At the Sunday Angelus, Pope Francis explains how the Transfiguration of Jesus reveals the beauty and splendour of divine Love incarnate in Christ. He encourages us to recognize this luminous beauty of love, even when it bears the marks of the cross.

Continued below.

friend problem

P.S. just FYI. ADD is no way correlated to Psychosis, or stalking, or mental health problems in general.

It is simply a disorder where people have a hard time, keeping their attention on things that are not highly stimulating mentally.

If a person has stalking behaviors or is psychotic or threatening in anyway, they may or may not have ADD but the ADD itself Will never be the cause of any kind of dangerous behavior.
  • Informative
Reactions: saved24
Upvote 0

Woman Helped 100 Seniors Re-Home Their Pets Before Passing Away, Bringing ‘Peace of Mind’

That’s awesome thanks for posting Michie!

It’s quite the conundrum. On one hand pets add so much to the happiness and well-being of a person’s life, especially to the elderly but on the other hand an elderly person will typically pass away before the pet which leaves the pet homeless. Good on Angela Rafuse for *refusing* ;) to allow those life and love giving animals to then later suffer in their subsequent life.

I myself only acquire rescue animals not wanting to encourage breeding animals for profit that just propitiates the euthanasia of homeless animals.
Amen to that. I rescue as well. We need more compassionate people to help!
  • Agree
Reactions: Tigger45
Upvote 0

Author of ‘Rainbow Bridge’ Poem About an Animal Heaven was Finally Revealed–She Had No Idea it Went Viral

Around the US and UK, dozens of animal hospitals have a catch-all when it comes to grieving pet parents who have lost a furry friend: they give them the poem Rainbow Bridge.

Yet this poem that has touched millions of peoples’ hearts has remained largely authorless for years until the sleuth work of an art historian and cat owner Paul Koudounaris, who managed to turn up the original poet decades after Rainbow Bridge became famous.

Her name is Edna Clyne-Rekhy, an 82-year-old Scottish artist and animal lover who traveled the world, and failed to notice her poem’s popularity.

Continued below.

Turkish Firefighter Rescues Cat From Rubble and it Refuses to Leave His Side

Cats often get a bad rap for being loners, but one lucky kitty trapped under rubble in the Turkish quakes, will not allow himself to be parted from his rescuer.

When the devastating earthquakes hit Gaziantep in Turkey, they struck a country where cats are loved harder than perhaps any other.

A viral post on social media saw a Turkish firefighter named Ali Cakas with a dust-covered cat perched on his shoulder. Cakas found the animal buried in the rubble where it had been for ten days.

Continued below.

29 Species Have Recovered Enough in Australia to be Taken Off Endangered List–a Milestone for Celebration

A large research project studying endangered species in Australia has tallied 29 recovered species—all animals that can be safely de-listed from the country’s endangered species list.

Australia’s Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act currently lists 446 species of animals in genuine need of protection, but 29 of those are no longer in need—15 mammals, 8 birds, 4 frogs, a reptile, and a fish.

Among these critters are the golden, Western barred, and Eastern barred bandicoots, Western quoll, sooty albatross, waterfall frog, Flinder’s Range worm-lizard, yellow-footed rock wallabies, greater bilby, humpback whale, growling grass frog, Murray’s cod, and others.

Continued below.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,842,208
Messages
64,813,316
Members
273,738
Latest member
csmith8835