Who Is 'Destroying Democracy in Darkness?'
- By Ana the Ist
- American Politics
- 20 Replies
This is the first of the false claims VD Hanson makes:
I'm not really a fan of VD Hanson.
"A near decade ago, we witnessed the 2015-2016 Hillary Clinton/Democratic National Committee/FBI-assisted effort to plant the false accusation of Trump-Russian collusion to warp the 2016 election.
Yeah.
That gambit centered around the fraudulent Steele dossier and nearly fatally crippled the Trump 2016 campaign. That hoax would later sidetrack 22 months of his presidency before being proven a fantasy."
Well it didn't really sidetrack his campaign but it did hamstring the first 2 years of his presidency.
This is not true. The FBI investigation into Trump's associates in Summer 2016 was started because they had all sorts of their own hinky connections to Russia (the campaign manager received his payments from a Putin oligarch via money laundering;
Manafort was convicted of all sorts of stuff....I don't think much (if any) was campaign related. He got accused of the same things Hunter did....only difference was an investigation.
the "coffee boy" who bragged about being offered Russia supplied dirt on Clinton to an Australian diplomat; etc.)
Right. The Australian diplomat....who never tipped off the FBI before and was somehow treated as a solid gold informant.
None of them were dependent on the "Steele Dossier".
Well FISA warrants were. After all the wires had been tapped, associates had been threatened, and money wasted...they still had zilch. That didn't sit well with 2 of the lead investigators....who were texting each other fantasies of heroism for taking down Trump. The only thing in their way was this pesky lack of evidence.
The "Dossier" had virtually *no* impact on the campaign itself.
Probably, but that would be difficult to test. We can say the same of "Russian interference".
The first reporting based on copies reporters had gotten hold of occurred just a week or so before election day. Almost no attention was given to it.
Well....
Twitter was still in the hands of far left activists back then. I don't recall when the sordid contents of the "dossier" (dossier sounds so much better than lies on paper)....I'd thought it was earlier than a week though.
Either way.
(This was the time of the Access Hollywood tape, the wikileaks story after story from the hack of the Clinton campaign, and the endless stream of sexual harassment and assault accusations against Trump. One of those accusations that flared up at that time, but didn't become public was the Stormy Daniels affair that was suppressed by a large cash payment.)
Didn't she go on Bill Maher?
As for lengthy impact on the Trump Administration, that flared up not because of any "Dossier", but because the incoming NSA had an unsecured conversation with the Russian ambassador to the US and when questioned about it, lied to the FBI in his WH office.
Didn't that go nowhere?
The investigation and firing of General Misha that resulted from that encounter angered Trump who fired the FBI Director for it and *THAT* lead to the appointing of a special counsel.
That's at least the third explanation for Comey's firing and imo....the least likely.
VD Hanson is either woefully ignorant or he knew what he wrote was false. The editors of "Townhall.com" are either negligent or complicit in the lie.
If he's ignorant....it's not lie.
Upvote
0