Trump Promises to End Taxation of Overtime Pay
- By Arcangl86
- General Politics
- 10 Replies
Do we know if that includes payroll taxes?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I might add that one of Heiser's big interests was driven by Psalm 82, about the council of the gods. The biblical worldview does not deny the plurality of gods. It differs from paganism (the Babylonian mystery religion of Nimrod, with the Devil behind him) by denying their equality or superiority to Yahweh Elohim - the "Lord of gods" (my rendering). Heiser's PhD thesis at UWM was on this topic, as I recall."So God is still interested in reclaiming all nations for Himself"
It's not an island.a 'supercontinent' implies a big island. not a totally encompassing land mass.
you corrupted your wisdom because of your splendor;
so I cast you to the earth;
Always! Know that we on this board have your back in prayer and would love for you to keep us updated on your triumphs. They're coming! I'm glad to have met you, my brother.That was sick (as in awesome) thanks so much for that. I'm gonna keep telling myself and others that the almighty God doesn't create losers. Thank you for the support and for being my cheerleader!
Presumably Satan thought he could rule the earth as his own kingdom just as he rules it now from his base on and in the moon?It's actually an interesting question. A few months back in our home bible study we were pondering this very thing.
I suggested the following that many found quite interesting. Just why would Satan who they say was called Lucifer at the time.....even think to go this direction. Could it possibly have been for this reason? He knew God was all powerful when it came to ability....but perhaps he looked upon the gracious, kind, loving character of God as being LOVE and started to envision within himself maybe it's a weakness? In other words if he took actions to rebel against LOVE maybe LOVE would be too nice and give in having no backbone.
His great failure however was not to appreciate that for LOVE to be LOVE it has to draw the lines and stand by them in no uncertain terms or it'll bring darkness or what I call the degeneration of LIFE. LOVE made a warning of punishment so severe as well to keep all away from going into death. I think Satan wagered God ultimately wouldn't have the character to back it up. His way was a new way of strength according to him and he talked some angels into it. Of course we know the end result. HE WAS WRONG. He was trying to re-invent the wheel which rightly didn't need to be changed and most of the angels rejected his crazy presumptuous notion. I'm not saying all I shared here was exactly the way it was but it feels that way to me.
This needs a little explanation. From the Springfield News-SunThere were five lies being pushed in the video that I included in that paragraph.
The lies:
- 15,000 Haitians were imported into Springfield by VP Harris
I have addressed the first "premise" of your "argument" multiple times. You seem incapable of grasping your failure.No, you have not directly addressed the argument in its premises or conclusion. Rather, you have repeatedly deflected using nonsensical rabbit holes. Your latest rabbit hole leaves the mammalian category and invites us to go down a "tree" hole.
I see no attempt to persuade, only to obfuscate and weave.Only those with an open mind can be persuaded. Based on your replies, I judge that your mind is closed so I will only respond to your new posts that directly address the simple argument put forward.
wouldn't now a days the first thing you jumpt to be AI not photogshop?Photoshop's getting better.
Very interesting way to put it--"Proleptic." And I agree. What we will have in the future, with respect to our resurrection and glorification, is, in some sense previewed by our current redemption. We have a downpayment, spiritually, on our future inheritance. A great way to express it, I think. Thank you!A lot of the language that Paul uses (not just Paul, obviously, but Paul is big on it here) is proleptic. There is a sense in which the future bleeds into, or breaks into the present.
A really good example of this is when Paul says that we are "seated with Christ in heavenly places". Paul speaks present tense, even though we are obviously still very much right here on earth; yet at the same time we are--because we are in Christ--seated with Him. We are living and reigning with Him even though we are still down here.
Regeneration means the birth of a new man, a new human person; we are sharing in Christ's (resurrected) humanity right now, as a gift and work of God's grace. There is still the old man, who must be put to death daily through repentance. St. Paul talks about this struggle between the new man and the old man in Romans ch. 7. But Paul sees, already, in the powerful work of God's grace, by which we are alive by the Spirit, united to Christ, a new creation in Christ, that the old is passed, the old is dead. The old man died already in baptism (see Romans chapter 6), even as the new man was created, born, in that very baptism. Because we are in Christ there is a sense of receiving already what will be. We know that when Christ returns the dead shall be raised, in a sense we have received this already proleptically, through faith, by the power of the Holy Spirit.
We are also called to put off the old man and put on the new (Ephesians 4:22-23). It's something we have been given; and it's something that is to mark our ongoing struggle as followers of Jesus. We have been made new, we are being made new, and we will be made new.
The telos--the end or goal--is something which defines the present already. We will be saved, we have been saved, and we are being saved. We will rise again, we have been raised, we are being raised. What will be, has already, and is now.
We see in Christ what God will do, and God has already done it in/for Christ; and since we are in Christ, it is now our present reality. Through faith, by the power and work of the Holy Spirit.
-CryptoLutheran
They are killing and eating your chickens!Didn’t he post pics of roasting chickens and claim they were cats?
Yeah, I suppose that could be his reason for not going. I don't blame him for not going, either. As I said, I don't know what his reasons for not going are. He may very well have had a very good reason for choosing not to attend.He's quite old. I don't blame him?
I suspect changing your mind would be a nonstarter anyway, so I doubt there is any argument or piece of information I could offer that would suffice.You said you could point out a difference but you wouldn’t because it wouldn’t change my mind. That would be the point in doing so.
Yup.You do realize I can see all of your posts, right?
I made the point I intended to make. Apologies if it wasn't the one you wanted me to make.So for the last few pages you’ve posted a lot of reasons why they used that phrase, largely due to leadership, and when you finally stated that there were differences, you’ve bailed out.
No excuses from this end. I'll just wish you a good day.I get it. I’ll leave you to your final and inevitable excuse.
I think of the question along these lines. Person A says "Consider the set of humans with traits X, Y, and Z." Person B says "Consider the set of humans with traits Z and either W or X." Person C is interested in still another set of human traits, etc. And now A, B, and C argue about which set is more useful to consider and which set is more usefully labelled "woman". The argument is about which set to attach the vocabulary word to.
But if instead there's something essential about being a "woman", then it's meaningful to say that a particular definition "should"/"shouldn't" be used, or that a particular definition is right or wrong. From this point of view, saying "that definition is wrong" is saying more than just "that's not how most people use the word". I think.
So from this second viewpoint, it's meaningful to say things like "it's wrong for a women's college to accept thus-and-so kinds of students, because those students aren't really women", and the speaker is saying more than just "this is the set of students I want to study with". And this clarifies for me some of the earlier statements in the thread, and some of the miscommunication.
Be very careful of the things you choose to feed into your mind. A great many Christians fail in this one areaAs a faithful Christian it’s been said there are many voices that seek control of our minds. Everyone gets hit with something, and everything from self doubt, to anger, judgment, and so on. Lately I’ve felt like a ping pong ball being bounced between good and evil.
I trust the Word. As a believer I know things are not as bad as they seem. I would like to request some prayers during this strange season that I’m in.
Thank you