Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wait, let me see if I've got this. The military shooting shipwrecked survivors of an attack are presumed innocent until proven guilty, but the people in the boats that were attacked are not? They're just presumed guilty automatically?Remember, it's presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. Right now the law is on @Oompa Loompa's side if he's presuming innocence.
Of course you can. Someone may be defending the act but not the label. If Joe Schmoe punches a baby in the face and his defenders deny that he committed child abuse, they are defending the act however it may be labeled.There's two sides to what happened. One can not in good faith accuse someone of defending war crimes or murder, until it's been proven by a court of law that war crimes and or murder took place.
The foxes may very well declare the hen-house rampagers as justified.It may turn out that neither charge is brought against those in the administration and the military who were involved and the action is ruled as justified.
Remember, it's presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. Right now the law is on @Oompa Loompa's side if he's presuming innocence.
We have freedom of religion, Tubberville is wrong and ultimately the Muslims will prevail.
You can't tell them that they can't build a larger school when it's a private school.
In Dearborn Michigan they have taken over the entire town and they have plans elsewhere to build a Muslim only community.
They really are not restricted that much in the US
Not really. It intentionally points out that it goes both ways.

But we were in an authorized military action against the terrorists that would flee into Pakistan from Afghanistan.From 2004 to 2018 the US conducted hundreds of airstrikes against terrorist operations in Pakistan, without being at war with Pakistan.
So called Narco terrorists and not a military action authorized by Congress. This isn't about narcotics. If it was, Trump wouldn't be making deals with Cartels and criminal gangs, and Central American leaders that are guilty of bringing drugs into this country. Trump most likely wants Venezuelan oil.In the same way the US is conducting airstrikes against Narco-terrorist operations coming out of or within Venezuela, without being at war with Venezuela.
Or Stonecutters.
You cannot be for real. Your absolute lack of self awareness needs to be studied.There's two sides to what happened. One can not in good faith accuse someone of defending war crimes or murder, until it's been proven by a court of law that war crimes and or murder took place. It may turn out that neither charge is brought against those in the administration and the military who were involved and the action is ruled as justified. Remember, it's presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. Right now the law is on @Oompa Loompa's side if he's presuming innocence.
Now it makes sense why your foreign policy views align with many of the Democrats I knew back in the '90s. They shared similar perspectives on foreign policy as you do.
I am a conservative, but not MAGA! The conservatism I believe ended the day Mitt Romney lost the 2012 election!
I agree with most of this completely and yet this is the very reason Jesus could truthfully say in Matt 19:17,The 10 are presented to a post-exodus Israel and establish a covenant relationship. They are framed in a way for a specific time, place and people and we shouldn't expect them to be universal as they were never presented that way. We cannot superimpose the 10 over Christian living and expect the same results because we are not in the same conditions the 10 were made in. The 10 have monotheistic claims and moral pillars framed in a way that uniquely challenges Israel and the surrounding cultures (through Israel). In the NT Christ reframes these as a heuristic approach over a list of dos and donts that is often summed up by NT authors as "loving your neighbour as yourself,"; this is known as "Christ's law".
It is this law that is fundamental and reaches deeper than the 10 can ever. First, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart,” this includes the monotheistic claims of the 10 but also far greater. it is not only about idolatry, graven images and using his name in vain (which of course are not consistent with loving God with all your heart), but also innately our every action as directly involved with obedience to love God. Christ calls this the greatest commandment. The second is to love your neighbour as yourself. and this certainly includes not murdering your neighbour, stealing, lying, sleeping with their wife, etc... but it goes far deeper. We are no longer merely resisting doing harm, but Christ flips it and tells us we should be actively seeking to love others.
The 10 simply do not go to this length, and I may keep the 10 but hate my neighbour (and yes, even hate God), which is inconsistent with Christ's law. We cannot approach Christ if we cannot seriously approach our own actions critically to align with Christ. Christ's law has this goal, where the 10 are lacking, and we can keep the 10 while failing to critically address sin in our lives. This is the conversation Christ has with the Pharisees; it wasn't about how well they kept the law, Christ was more interested in their heart. The heuristic approach in Christ's law is not about a check list, and we must actively participate in understanding how our actions contribute to loving God/neighbour.
In its day the 10 were radical claims and ways of thinking challenging not just Israel but surrounding cultures too as a polemic to show order and restoration under God, but Christ's goes deeper than the 10 ever can; He is interested in letters of not just "the heart" but "OUR heart" which is the place where the value is birthed, but he is not interested in the letters on stone which can be exploited to support our own sin and may be devorced from our heart. It is good to think that murder, adultery, stealing, etc... are wrong but most (if not all) would accept this throughout all of civilization without any prompting and the 10 do not hold dominion over these moral claims. It is better to cut to the heart over a motivation to resist evil (which is limited, especially when condensed to 10), but actively be involved with doing good in all our actions. Christ himself tells us "it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath" (Mat 12:12), establishing that goodness itself is above sabbath law (directly) but also more broadly is a comment on all law and a nod to his own commandment that is Christ's law. This focus you will find is far more consistent throughout the NT.
Clearly you don't understand the 4 dementia chess Trump is playing. Gas is at the lowest price in decades. View attachment 374343Oil futures rose yesterday after news of the ship's seizure was announced.
"This is just yet another geopolitical/sanctions headwind hammering spot supply availability," Rory Johnston, an analyst with Commodity Context, said.
Good job Donald. It's almost as though he wants to increase the price oil. Shell oil, who ships 150,000 barrels per day to the US from Venezuela, should be happy with higher prices though.
Adam, and Eve the first sinners. God created everything good and very good so no disease or pain or death but they broke Gods one command to not eat from the tree of knowledge of good, and evil so God cursed the world in Genesis 3. All humans after them have 'sinned'. Creation was around 5500 BC. Creation . com and answers in genesis have articles about creation vs evolution biology fossils etc if someone has not looked into that already.Before anyone becomes a Christian they are “in the world“ , they are unconverted and still in their sins. The scripture says all have sinned, just what is it that determines this ? What is that we have done that makes us sinners ? Scripture says we need Jesus to have these sins forgiven, so we need Jesus to take away whatever it is that says we are sinners. I know we are saved from our sins but what is it that calls us sinners
because that is what we need saved from. All people need saved from whatever it is that calls us sinners. People in the past, the present and the future all need saved from whatever it is that says we are sinners.
Sure, we need saved from sin but sin is the result of whatever it is that defines what sin is. What is it ?
This act introduces sin and death into human history.“The woman took of the fruit… and ate; she also gave to her husband… and he ate.”
“Because you have eaten… cursed is the ground because of you.”
Shows sin is not just actions — it’s a condition.“Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.”
This describes inherited impurity.“Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? No one.”
This is the clearest universal statement.“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”
Even the Old Testament states universal sinfulness.“There is no one who does not sin.”
“Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins.”
“Through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned.”
This explains why we are sinners — we inherited Adam’s fallen condition.“Through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners.”
“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked.”
“From within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts… All these evils come from inside and defile a person.”
Even our best deeds cannot erase our sinfulness.“All our righteous acts are like filthy rags.”
The irony is palpable.There's two sides to what happened. One can not in good faith accuse someone of defending war crimes or murder, until it's been proven by a court of law that war crimes and or murder took place. It may turn out that neither charge is brought against those in the administration and the military who were involved and the action is ruled as justified. Remember, it's presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. Right now the law is on @Oompa Loompa's side if he's presuming innocence.
Have you already received your standard issue Patch, Eye and Parrot, Shoulder?
Gravity. Obviously.
We have freedom of religion, Tubberville is wrong and ultimately the Muslims will prevail.I acknowledge all of these points. It is a recognized fact that Christian persecution occurs in certain regions within the Islamic world. In some Muslim-majority countries, preaching the gospel is not only prohibited but can also pose serious risks to personal safety.
You're correct; such persecution wouldn't occur in the USA. However, comparing America—with its rule of law and religious freedom—to Syria is neither appropriate nor reasonable.
As I have mentioned before—and as this thread demonstrates—it is easier to establish a Christian school led by an American missionary in rural Bangladesh, such as Malumghat, than to open an Islamic school in Alabama.
Jesus actually quoted 1 Enoch to the Sadducees, and told them they were ignorant of the scriptures (1 Enoch). Also the ystuff up a story in Tobit so Jesus was saying they were ignorant of that too.Lets keep the context of the conversation, claiming that there exists " inspired" texts outside the Tannak and New Testament.
This is the comment I am referring to:
"Actually at the time of Christ different groups of Jews recognized different lists of books as Holy Scripture. "
This is what Jesus Christ of Nazareth said about traditions of men:
Mark 7:8-9, 13 (NKJV):
“For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men—the washing of pitchers and cups, and many other such things you do.” He said to them, “All too well you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your tradition. ... making the word of God of no effect through your tradition which you have handed down. And many such things you do.”
Matthew 22:29 (NKJV):
> “Jesus answered and said to them, ‘You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God.’
During His ministry, Christ Jesus challenged Jewish leaders who derived their authority from sources beyond the established written Tannak. The primary target of His condemnation was the Pharisaic Oral Tradition (the "tradition of the elders"), which they treated as divine law, yet He rebuked them for allowing these man-made rules to nullify the written Word of God (Mark 7:8, 13, NKJV). Separately, groups like the Essenes relied on circulating Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphical books for unique doctrines, while the Sadducees rejected everything but the Torah. By consistently citing and emphasizing the entirety of the written Scriptures and condemning the Sadducees for "not knowing the Scriptures" (Matthew 22:29, NKJV), Jesus fundamentally rejected the legitimacy of any new, non-prophetic authority, be it oral legalism or speculative literature, that attempted to supplant or add to the authority of God's established written revelation.
From 2004 to 2018 the US conducted hundreds of airstrikes against terrorist operations in Pakistan, without being at war with Pakistan.
In the same way the US is conducting airstrikes against Narco-terrorist operations coming out of or within Venezuela, without being at war with Venezuela.
Whether the symbol originated with the Nazis, Hindus, Jainists, Buddhists, or pre-Christian people in Europe, I fail to see its relevance on a Christian forum, or why you posted it.