Michie said:

Nobody is a parasite. We can always add the men that can’t keep it in their pants.

Click to expand...

They should go extinct too.

rambot said:

What does an "Actually a man's body" look like?

I've seen post operation transexuals that do not look like "Actually a man's body" at ALLLLLL

Click to expand...

They still have an Adam’s apple.

Arcangl86 said:

Uh, do you not know what a democracy is? Just because we have one counter democratic (which itself is chosen democratically) doesn't mean we aren't a democracy. And sidenote, naziism is facism, not socialism. You can tell by the fact that they banned and arrested actual socialists.

Click to expand...

Let me guess: democrats were republicans when they owned slaves and the party switched as soon as democrats started doing good stuff too. Lol. The nazis also burned a bunch of pedophile books.

durangodawood said:

For sure Berkeley (town and U) has a certain radical subculture. But the other 90+% is just doing normal college stuff at a high level.

Click to expand...

BCP1928 said:

I think that's true of all the universities that Trump accuses of woke activism.

Click to expand...

Is a little bit of that possibly their own fault for not reigning in their more radical portions of the student body just a little bit?

There have been a couple different high profile incidents involving protesting (some of which escalated past normal protesting) in order to get certain speakers cancelled and disinvited from booked events.







If Berkeley doesn't want to be "unfairly labelled" as the "woke school"...

Perhaps things like "Disinviting Bill Maher, because he said something mean about Islam on HBO", and "riots with a $100k worth of damage and banned weapons being brought on campus by protestors because Milo was invited to speak", and "phoning in bomb threats to prevent Ann Coulter from speaking", and "Ben Shapiro needing to be protected by 300 cops just to get him to the venue because protestors were trying to block it" is the sort of thing they'd want to curtail a bit.


When you boil that down, it's basically like saying:

"We're not woke, we just have a large subset of people who throw temper tantrums, light stuff on fire, and phone in bomb threats when the college republican group on our campus invites people to speak who we feel triggered by"

And that "bad look" is made even worse when, for a few of those, faculty actually participated in the protesting outside the venues.

The professors should've been the first ones volunteering to go up to mic to take on Shapiro head-on during the hour long "open mic" portion of his events, not screeching out in the parking lot with some of the students.

PR is 90% of the game with regards to perception.


Berkeley objecting to being labelled as "a woke school" is sorta like the Buffalo hat guy from J6 objecting to be labelled as "a wacky conspiracy theorist".

Fantine said:

I am glad that, in an era where Texas and other states are trying to wipe all evidence of slavery off the map, racism is being called out,

Click to expand...

Texas Senate passed a bill that forbids public schools from teaching history and current events about race that might upset students.

Here you go.

johnnypapa said:

You would think we'd get a closer view.

Click to expand...

Hans Blaster said:

Not if tendered at the cash register.

Click to expand...

That depends on which cash register is chosen.

10% over spot seems like a pretty good deal to me.

Login to view embedded media
This is but one example of these food stores that I've seen that trade in constitutional money.

ThatRobGuy said:

If the land that is now the US had been attained via conquest by Muslims instead of Christians & Deists, do you think such a document would've ever been drafted (with concepts like separation of church and state, and checks and balances), or would it have followed the pattern of other Muslim conquest, where after the "convert or die" phase of the process is over, the first thing to be done is establish a cleric who will rule with an iron fist and harshly punish those who step out of line based on a religious code that also acts as a legal code?

Click to expand...

Here are some examples:

• Indonesia: As the world's largest Muslim-majority country, Indonesia is a prominent example of a functioning, secular, and pluralistic democracy. It has successfully held multiple free elections and experienced peaceful transitions of power since transitioning from an authoritarian regime in the late 1990s.
• Bangladesh: Bangladesh is also generally considered an electoral democracy with secular principles enshrined in its constitution, though it faces political challenges.
• Senegal: Senegal has a long history of stability and multi-party democracy, even electing a Christian president despite a more than 92% Muslim population, highlighting its strong secular traditions and tolerance.
• Albania and Kosovo: These European countries have Muslim majorities but are officially secular states with democratic systems.

For me it all started with. Kid’s show, Tales of the Riverbank. The theme song was nice and I found out later was a version of Maurio Giuliani’ Andante

Rev 13, and last kingdom of Dan 2,7 are still future. Sounds like the first beast in Rev 13 which is a person will survive an assassination attempt.

Here is the explanation of Rev 13


Interestingly enough spiritually satanic leaven of the Pharisees "Israel" had a deadly would 70 AD when God used the Romans to destroy it, and kill the people that killed Jesus but now since the 1900s that deadly wound has healed however that is not what it means as I stated above.

The real Donald Trump?

Remember When Trump Tried to Bulldoze a Widow’s Home to Make a Parking Lot for Limos?​

(Donald Trump) has spent two decades trying to evict the Scots who live next to his luxury golf course.
For almost two decades, a small band of Scots has resisted The Trump Organization’s efforts to turn their land into a playground for the super-rich. First he tried to buy them out, and then he tried to intimidate them—but they refused to uproot themselves for the sake of a billionaire’s bank account.

James alleged the non-profit failed to meet as a corporate board, failed to conduct any relevant oversight regarding grants issued and also failed to implement any policy whatsoever which might have protected the charity's funds from being skimmed by the Trump clan.

"In this vacuum of oversight and diligence, Mr. Trump caused the foundation to enter repeatedly into self-dealing transactions and to coordinate unlawfully with his presidential campaign," James said in her filing with the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

Relatively amusingly, James also noted that Trump personally ordered his charity to spend $100,000 in order to settle legal claims over an 80-foot flagpole he had built at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Last December, the Trump Foundation agreed to dissolve under judicial supervision due to Underwood's initial lawsuit.

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M​

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A judge on Friday approved an agreement for President Donald Trump to pay $25 million to settle lawsuits over his now-defunct Trump University, ending nearly seven years of legal battles with customers who claimed they were misled by failed promises to teach success in real estate.

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel said the agreement represents an “extraordinary amount” of money for customers to recover. Plaintiff attorneys say about 3,730 people will get at least 90 percent of their money back.

Meet the (Many) Small Business Owners Stiffed by Donald Trump​

It's not just whatever he was doing with Epstein; he's got a long history of behavior.

Investment accounts for children

I'm not big on investment so my opinion doesn't mean much but I'm inclined to this that this would be a net benefit idea.

I really am unsure it would accomplish what it is planned to accomplish but it seems like a good idea.


People who understand this kinda stuff....thoughts?

Say it aint so said:

killed wounded civilians

Click to expand...

Killed narco terrorists designated as enemy combatants in the global war of terror.

Always in His Presence said:

I thought we were done?

Click to expand...

Did I say that?

I was asking a clarifying question on your latest post.

BCP1928 said:

Yes, the Democrats won't vote for a policy they are vehemently opposed to so the Republicans shut down the Government. Whose "fault" is that?

Click to expand...

Delvianna said:

BOTH sides.

Click to expand...

No. "If you don't do what I say, I'll (hold my breath till I turn blue, shut down the government, throw a tantrum)" is not the fault of the person who elects not to cave to the tantrum.

In my profile it says I am a republican but that's only because I'm a single-issue voter when it comes to abortion. I believe there is no greater issue. I can understand the problems a Christian may have with Republicans based on immigration (problems that I myself have with the Republicans), but is it really worth siding with abortion enablers over? At least immigrants were allowed to be born!

Are you suggesting that this was done on purpose to signal to some nazis? Or just an unfortunate mistake like this:



...or like that one Florida political event that had (in big bold letters) "Pubic Safety" instead of "Public Safety"?

Michie said:

Flowers of the Madonna | EWTN

EWTN is a global, Catholic Television, Catholic Radio, and Catholic News Network that provides catholic programming and news coverage from around the world.

www.ewtn.com

Click to expand...

It's an interesting article, thank you.

rambot said:

I agree. Perhaps this report could get taken at face value.

Click to expand...

It's a report. It's not meant to meet the burden of proof in a court of law.
There will be more investigations and the billion in fraud that we are reading about is just the tip of the iceberg

Factotum said:

I am an Evangelical Christian looking to love the respectful, beautiful exchange of ideas here.
I heard nice things about this community. I have no expectations, I have no gripes. All I have is compassion for everyone.
And I thank yall, in advance, if yall plan to revere those things about me.

Click to expand...

I think I heard the angels sing upon your arrival. Welcome!

Delvianna said:

I'm saying the promise is not just spiritual but includes biological too but if it was only spiritual then you would have to disregard the verse I offered. NT = 50% of the info (spiritual Israel) OT = 50% of the info (biological Israeli's).

Click to expand...

Don't be distracted by Galatians 4:28.

You are correct in saying the Isaac's seed shall inherit the everlasting covenant.

We are indeed like Isaac, because in the Body of Christ, we are also considered the child of promise, because Christ is.

That, however, will not make us the seed of Isaac. Like Isaac and having Isaac as your father are two different things.

FAITH-IN-HIM said:

You’re debating a phrase in a verse- one verse says some people didn’t hear the voice, and then 23 years later, when Paul recounts the event, he says they heard the voice but didn’t see the man.

Click to expand...

Where did Luke hear the story? This isn't Paul recounting the story. This is Luke recounting the story. We don't know how long it took him to write from chapter 9 to chapter 22 but it wasn't 23 years. We don't know if Luke made the mistake or someone who copied the book. We don't have an original.

FAITH-IN-HIM said:

Is this why you claim the Bible is full of errors?

Click to expand...

Can you actually read my posts and show where I stated that the Bible is "full of errors"?

FAITH-IN-HIM said:

Discrepancies like these can be found throughout all four gospels.

Click to expand...

Okay, but I didn't even say that many. Some can be explained.

FAITH-IN-HIM said:

I'm sorry, but it seems you're more focused on proving your point, even if that means you consider the Bible to be full of errors.

Click to expand...

What do you think my point is? You've been incorrect thus far.

FAITH-IN-HIM said:

Have a nice day.

Click to expand...

You too.