A new kind of 'Roe Effect' has appeared
- General Politics
- 4 Replies
They should go extinct too.Nobody is a parasite. We can always add the men that can’t keep it in their pants.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They should go extinct too.Nobody is a parasite. We can always add the men that can’t keep it in their pants.
They still have an Adam’s apple.What does an "Actually a man's body" look like?
I've seen post operation transexuals that do not look like "Actually a man's body" at ALLLLLL
Uh, do you not know what a democracy is? Just because we have one counter democratic (which itself is chosen democratically) doesn't mean we aren't a democracy. And sidenote, naziism is facism, not socialism. You can tell by the fact that they banned and arrested actual socialists.
For sure Berkeley (town and U) has a certain radical subculture. But the other 90+% is just doing normal college stuff at a high level.
I think that's true of all the universities that Trump accuses of woke activism.
Texas Senate passed a bill that forbids public schools from teaching history and current events about race that might upset students.I am glad that, in an era where Texas and other states are trying to wipe all evidence of slavery off the map, racism is being called out,
That depends on which cash register is chosen.Not if tendered at the cash register.
Here are some examples:If the land that is now the US had been attained via conquest by Muslims instead of Christians & Deists, do you think such a document would've ever been drafted (with concepts like separation of church and state, and checks and balances), or would it have followed the pattern of other Muslim conquest, where after the "convert or die" phase of the process is over, the first thing to be done is establish a cleric who will rule with an iron fist and harshly punish those who step out of line based on a religious code that also acts as a legal code?
Killed narco terrorists designated as enemy combatants in the global war of terror.killed wounded civilians
I thought we were done?
Yes, the Democrats won't vote for a policy they are vehemently opposed to so the Republicans shut down the Government. Whose "fault" is that?
No. "If you don't do what I say, I'll (hold my breath till I turn blue, shut down the government, throw a tantrum)" is not the fault of the person who elects not to cave to the tantrum.BOTH sides.
It's an interesting article, thank you.![]()
Flowers of the Madonna | EWTN
EWTN is a global, Catholic Television, Catholic Radio, and Catholic News Network that provides catholic programming and news coverage from around the world.www.ewtn.com
It's a report. It's not meant to meet the burden of proof in a court of law.I agree. Perhaps this report could get taken at face value.
I think I heard the angels sing upon your arrival. Welcome!I am an Evangelical Christian looking to love the respectful, beautiful exchange of ideas here.
I heard nice things about this community. I have no expectations, I have no gripes. All I have is compassion for everyone.
And I thank yall, in advance, if yall plan to revere those things about me.

I'm saying the promise is not just spiritual but includes biological too but if it was only spiritual then you would have to disregard the verse I offered. NT = 50% of the info (spiritual Israel) OT = 50% of the info (biological Israeli's).
Where did Luke hear the story? This isn't Paul recounting the story. This is Luke recounting the story. We don't know how long it took him to write from chapter 9 to chapter 22 but it wasn't 23 years. We don't know if Luke made the mistake or someone who copied the book. We don't have an original.You’re debating a phrase in a verse- one verse says some people didn’t hear the voice, and then 23 years later, when Paul recounts the event, he says they heard the voice but didn’t see the man.
Can you actually read my posts and show where I stated that the Bible is "full of errors"?Is this why you claim the Bible is full of errors?
Okay, but I didn't even say that many. Some can be explained.Discrepancies like these can be found throughout all four gospels.
What do you think my point is? You've been incorrect thus far.I'm sorry, but it seems you're more focused on proving your point, even if that means you consider the Bible to be full of errors.
You too.Have a nice day.
unscrollingthescriptures.com