B flat B♭
- By Phil G
- Conspiracy Theories
- 1546 Replies
Rinse & repeat my post # 1539No I'm not, all that Jerry N mentioned is not true.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Rinse & repeat my post # 1539No I'm not, all that Jerry N mentioned is not true.
I'm not sure which verse or chapter of 2 Tess you're referring to, but I already know that it doesn't mean what your trying to suggest it's saying. I assume it saying those in hell will not enjoy communion with God, because He doesn't show them any mercy or love. All they see from God is His wrath and vengeance and torment.So, are you just avoiding the question here, or what? Does hell involve the absence of God’s presence, as maintained in 2 Thess, or not?
God said in Exodus 16:23 "tomorrow is the Sabbath". The one who trusts that God was so confused in Ex 16 so as not to know which day was the actual Sabbath in Gen 2:2-3 is trusting a straw theology of God.And if I may, the Sabbath started in creation at an unknown point.
I am most interested in your last sentence, and would appreciate your expansion on it, if you're willing. Of the several kinds of parishes around, when it this test passed, and when is it failed, and when is it avoided? Of course some of us really have no viable choice in the matter - in which case it seems, God has chosen for us.My former parish has embraced the LGBTQ+ ideology. Conservatives and of course Trump
supporters, are convinced to leave. It doesn't matter if you don't support Trump, but as
long as they think you do, you're not welcomed.
This is when love and forgiveness is put to the test.
Your denomination, obviously teaches "legalism", that simply means that you guys believe that you will be saved by keeping the law/commandments. But God has never ever said that anyone will be saved by keeping the law or commandments.The definition is in the New Testament and the Lord summed in His commandments to us ( Matthew 7:12, Matthew 22:36-40 etc.) which originally are in the Old Testament ( Deuteronomy 6:4, Leviticus 19:18). You will notice that the golden rule ( Matthew 7:12 per Matthew 7:1-12) is the “LAW & PROPHETS” and that on God’s commandments ( Matthew 22:36-40 etc.) are which the “LAW & PROPHETS” hang or are dependent on.
You have something against the Gospel? I don’t claim any right to speak for God but to obey His commandments ( however wretchedly I do) but He tells us to ( John 14:15-18). The ultimate thing God “hates” is evil and that is what we are allowed to “hate” ( Amos 5:14-15). I would take care to not rationalize any idea of self justification as being justified by what God may “hate.”
I would carefully read ( Isaiah 55:1-12) especially Isaiah 55:8 ( I know ya did so what am I telling you huh?) well reread it and the Lord’s commandments.
Yes health insurance is expensive. Obamacare didn't solve that even though thats what we were promised. Instead it cost us more in the way of taxes to cover the subsidies.Health insurance of any sort has been expensive since long before the ACA. It was expensive before we got RomneyCare in MA. Do you guys not remember that? I knew self-employed people paying $2-3k/mo for family plans in the early 2000's.
They said in Brazil they want to use AI to search the internet for post of 'hate speech'.
Youtube i think has been using ai to moderate posts for a while, posts they ai doesn't like posts it deletes.
They have seen it. They have seen you defend it. The only reason you seem to care about it is whom is it against.Perhaps, one day, liberals will accept the reality of weaponized lawfare.
Rare earths are not actually that rare outside China. What is rare is developed commercial sources of them. The concerning thing here is that the Chinese understood this ten years ago while free market capitalism decided it was not worth pursuing until the numbers added up. So the obvious question is whether Chinese communism is superior to the current Western system of governance when it comes to strategic decision making?
Americans have been criticising Europeans for a similar lack of strategic awareness on matters of military and energy security and now have a told you so attitude as the EU scrambles to catch up with the modern world. But the rare earth monopoly that China currently enjoys could also have been anticipated in the same way.
So what are the new areas where America and its allies are blind to global trends but the Communists are already preparing. Do we have a plan or are we just going to let Wall Street bungle this one also as they did with Rare Earths?
I would quit worrying about denominations. To me the criteria isthis has worried me, do I need to be a Catholic to be saved, or a Protestant? Or does the denomination have nothing to do with it?
I never said that. Please don't put words in my mouth.Jesus did not mean that before a Christian give water to thirsty, Christian should verify legal status of the thirsty.
I never said that, don't put words in my mouth.When Jesus said give shelter to shelter less, jesus did not mean verify his immigration stratus before you welcome him to your home. When Jesus said take care the orphan, Jesus never meant that the orphan must be natural born citizen of your homeland.
Not to assert any particular view of my own, but I can definitely state this is what the Luciferians / Satanists teach their people, and they call it an "androgenous" being. It is in their books and their claim to why they convert their male children into females and females into males at a young age. It is their "religion" and they say that "god" (lucifer / satan / baphomet) is this way and that is their basis for calling themselves "gods" like Satan told Eve that "ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil" (KJV - "ye" meaning her and Adam, plural version of "you" meaning both) in the garden if she ate the fruit. This is also where the baphomet comes from having parts of both genders and being an idol that is a pagan "god." The greeks were notorious for their men dressing as women. You can see this in some of the movies made these days where the men are wearing wigs, and the scenes clearly showing it is a wig depicting them putting it on and taking it off etc.I have heard that Adam and Eve were in one body before
Yeah, we often get more insight than we know. This has happened to me a number of times where I go back and while I'm reading God shows me something that "should have been obvious" but wasn't the first umpteen times around the block. I feel confident God showed me (I'm more than confident within myself, but I can't prove it to others so lets just say confident) what the forbidden fruit was. There were a number of different angles that the revelation made sense, but it is kind of "in your face" that once they ate the fruit the snake didn't just "stop talking." More so, he was after that incident inside their head and chirping in their ear accusations and ideas and who knows what, as they were suddenly vulnerable to evil having engaged with it. (like playing with weegee [yes I spell it that wayThe parts about Adam having freedom to eat from the Tree of Life (before he ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil) and Adam having responsibilities for the Garden of Eden - it's little things like this we miss, and when someone points them out, we have to go back and look.
I don't think there was any sin before the tree eating episode, no. Not from my vantage point for sure, I just can't see where that could ever be possible. I believe considering the notion of it leads one down an entire rabbit trail of hypothetical situations that just exist in imaginary land and derail from seeing what was actually going on. God obviously dealt with the situation immediately and showed His necessity to punish (justice) and yet still had mercy (made skins to cover symbolizing Christ's blood being shed for them and us). I think this is a clear portrayal of God's character in the behavior without Him really having to say much at all, being that what He done speaks for itself. He also did help them after they fell as well though, like Cain, God helped him even though he didn't listen to God when God told Cain that if he simply done what God asked (sacrifice of blood / representation of depending on being humble and accepting God's work to save us/them - versus - being prideful and trying to save oneself through offering one's own work to God)The part about Adam's condition of "good" not lasting - I'm not so sure about this. It's hard to think that Adam was sinning before he ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. And if it is true, why was God so patient with him and helping him? Don't we tend to view God differently?
I don't think that it is quite so simple to blame everything on Eve. 1 Timothy 2:12 - 1 Timothy 2:13 - 1 Timothy 2:14 seem to suggest that she is to be blamed by some people, but I don't think it is blame being stated at all but being deceived like it says. If Adam was not deceived then he ate the fruit willingly when given to him by Eve and I don't really know how that could be much better. At one point I considered it the ultimate act of love, that Adam done it purely because he loved his wife. Then later it dawned on me that Eve was suddenly endued with the ability to be deceptive and seductive (knowledge of evil - sinner wants others to sin with - experience teaches this more clearly) and so it seemed she tricked him kind of to me (if reading between those lines in that thought pattern). But the Scripture actually states that it was not Adam who was deceived in 1 Timothy 2:14 meaning from a literal standpoint of interpreting the Scriptures he simply must have deliberately disobeyed God because he was losing his wife who he loved. She must have been afraid and that must have played a part in his choice, because they both were terrified due to being naked and realizing it from eating the fruit, so Eve must have realized this first and been afraid when she showed up to Adam with the fruit. I don't think he was clueless that "something was wrong" and I don't think she was acting normal. I think she was acting like a child does when they have been tricked by another person to do something bad and have awareness that they are going to get caught.In both Discussion 1 and 2, I think that Bushnell's analysis on Scripture and what Scripture says itself derails Patriarchy. Patriarchy likes to protect Adam and blame everything on Eve, but God is not one sided and will always judge truthfully and accurately.
The people of Israel and all mankind have always been God's children.And do you believe what Heb. 9:18 says ??
It reads , Therefore. , not even the FIRST COVENANT. WAS dedicated WITH OUT BLOOD.
Do you believe verse 18. !!
Put it another WAY. the OLD COVENANT. had to be set aside , WHEN JESUS DIED on. the CROSS and his BLOOD. SHED
THEN anyone meaning GENTILES WERE GIVEN SALVATION
And says that you are BORN AGAIN and BORN OF WATER AND THE SPIRIT. is speaking to ISRAEL in EZE 36:25
and EZE 37 :1-28 AND Israel will be BORN AGAIN !!
DAN P
I think that God's hand is in American politics in ways most do not imagine. All these negative seeds are coming to harvest. I think God wanted Biden, then Trump in place to show the American people how far off we are from His will. Unlike many I think we are going to roll downhill from here. Hopefully that will set in motion the humility ad discernment that is needed for a true move of God.Why didn't the Biden administration embarrass Steve Bannon by leaking his connection to Epstein? He is a Trump ally.