Sept 23rd Rapture
- Current News & Events (Articles Required)
- 271 Replies
Well, the guy has a point, it's just, instead of boat, he should build space rocket. ^^
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If only he’d remember some of his songs.He should have just stayed in the band.
Was it important? Did she need a minimum for something? Are you/she pleased?The school district IQ tested my older daughter. She scored 129.
I have no hatred for Trump and pray for him regularly. Trump was fairly elected but not overwhelmingly. He received less than half of the popular vote.Whatever! Your hatred of the lawfully and overwhelmingly elected Commander in Chief is noted.
Haven't you been reading or listening to the news? They just seized a very large oil tanker from Venezuela.So tell us, if Trump wants the oil so bad, why hasn't he done anything to seize any Venezuelan oil?
George W. Bush was an educated man, I've seen his summer home in Maine, and no doubt, he attended the most pristine universities in the country. Also, no doubt, he was subjected to the ideologies that were the precursors to modern wokism, without even knowing it at the time.With the exception of roughly 10%–15% of American or European liberals, support for unrestricted migration is rare. Your assertion presents a misleading narrative, though you are entitled to your opinion.
Personally, I welcome immigrants from all regions of the world and support providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who have lived in the USA for many years. I have voted for several Republican presidents who held these views; one president I supported twice referred to himself as a "compassionate conservative." Anyone who claims that compassionate conservative George W. Bush is "woke" is entirely mistaken.
Just because you disagree with these policies does not make them "woke."
The final test, then, is over true or false worship based either on obedience to God’s law, including the Sabbath, or a man-made day of worship, Sunday.
Yes, but I still find this nativity scene to be inappropriate. My opinion only.The teachings of Jesus have political implications. I don't fault a church for speaking truth to power.
well, jesus stated that Genesis was a literal historical account, and he supported them as being rel and created by God, not coming from primate parentsI hear Christians talking about Adam and Eve.
What did Jesus say about Adam and Eve?
“Adam” is not mentioned in the Gospels.
“Eve” is not mentioned in the Gospels.
The “Garden of Eden” is not mentioned in the Gospels.
Doesn’t this suggest that the Adam and Eve story is less important than many Christians think it is?
Hi ArbitorYou seem to be saying that the Spiritual gifts are only for the local corporate body of Christ,... is that correct?
at seems to be loaded doen, as the Swede when handloaded in modern rifles pretty much same as the Creedmoreyeah I use load data from that cartridge.
Every school where? My personal experience of public school dates back to 1948 and includes attending it, teaching in it and having children in it in five different states. I have never encountered prayer or Bible study in any public school.
agreeI don't think that's a good excuse to rough up this guy.
Login to view embedded mediaWhat's that leopards eating my face line again?
Sadly probably true. Just like the Ds need to be competitive with gerrymandering even though they would abolish everywhere if they had their way. You have to play the game youre in and not some other ideal one.If you want to fight against a top-down GOP, it'll be hard to do that without a top-down DNC.
lol, I mean, in a different time and under a different set of circumstances, perhaps more age would be better.
Yep. Its number one (of the obviously foreseeable issues). Funny tho how even among people most connected to the industry there's nothing like consensus about what its all going to mean. "Very serious" people see everything from heaven on earth to total human extinction.But we're approaching a time where two hot topics are going to be
1) Crypto-related matters
2) Artificial intelligence
And I'm thinking that in the next 3-5 years #2 will be THE paramount topic, and I don't think I'm saying anything controversial by suggesting that the "tech stuff" (especially new tech stuff) is more of a young man's game that younger people are going to be more familiar with as a general rule.
The young person advantage is less profound as every year passes. Soon even "old" folks will have come up in the digital/mobile age. I say that as a person who grew up with a rotary dial phone connected to a land line.Same goes for the Senate, they have even a worse aging problem in the upper house.
I just don't think that crypto and AI are going to be effectively evaluated & regulated by a group of people who are in the age demographic that they often need to get a niece or grandson to help them figure out how to connect to their printer.
This takes some explanation.Hey bling
I'm not sure what your point of contention is here. Elaborate on it if you have one. Right now I'm only guessing. Yes, all those verses say water baptism. Do you agree that Jesus did and still does baptize with the Holy Spirit in response to a genuine faith, which "places us" in Him, a spiritual "immersion" that makes us one with Him, the Body, the true Church? You'll notice that anything that I wrote that is between "quotation marks" are used in place of the word baptism, because they mean the same thing. Example....
Christian water baptism included the Spirit as Paul points out in Acts 19: 1-7. As shown in Acts 8 there was definitely Christian water baptism and only with the apostles laying on of their hands was Holy Spirit baptism given.1 Corinthians 12:13 For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body--whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free--and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.
Not everyone receives a baptism of fire or the Holy Spirit, but all true believers do receive the much more important indwelling Holy Spirit.My translation: For by one Spirit we were all "placed into" into one body--whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free--and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.
another....
Matthew 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
I do not limit God/Spirit’s actions, so when a person obtains the power of the indwelling portion of the Holy Spirit is up to Deity and does not have to precede water baptism.My interpretation: I indeed "immerse" you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will "immerse" you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
Sorry, it sounded to me like you're playing both sides of the fence. So many today are wrongly taught that water baptism is what initiates the Spiritual baptism. If you're being water baptized, you already have faith, and are already spiritually baptized by Jesus with the Holy Spirit before you hit that water. Agree?
Where the Samaritans in Acts 8, Christian water baptized without being given any miraculous Holy Spirit powers?Sorry bling, I disagree. I believe that the water represents God's judgment. That's what the flood was. "In Christ", our Arc, we are protected from that Judgment just like Noah and family were. It's a perfect picture of our Spirit baptism. Not the removal of filth from the flesh is just like saying not water baptism. Just so there was no misunderstanding.
David, you are misunderstanding.Hey bling, the circumcision's comment was just a point of possible interest that I threw in there.
OT water baptism was simply identifying with a persons teachings publicly. That's all it is. A public testimony. That idea carried over to the NT. It pictured outwardly what had already happened inwardly as a result of faith. It identified us with Christ Jesus publicly. Some were baptized only into the name of Jesus because the Holy Spirit and the Father were already understood to be a part of them. The point of contention with the public testimony of these OT believers would have been the name Jesus. Others, found it better to publicly identify with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, since they were never believers in the OT.
OT believers were baptized into the name of the teacher they were under. Remember Paul confronting the Corinthians for arguing about being baptized by Paul or Apollos? It all came from that. The one true baptism is the one BY Jesus with the Holy Spirit. It's a spiritual baptism initiated by faith. Water baptism comes after that fact as a public testimony. Paul even finished by saying that "Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel". That would be a very, very odd thing to say if water baptism had anything to do with anything beyond a public testimony.
1 Corinthians 1:12-17 Now I say this, that each of you says, "I am of Paul," or "I am of Apollos," or "I am of Cephas," or "I am of Christ." Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul? I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, lest anyone should say that I had baptized in my own name. Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas. Besides, I do not know whether I baptized any other. For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect.
bling, I've seen this with Catholicism before, they are not really doing what they are doing, and not really saying what they are saying. You're language just sounded very familiar to the kind of language that they so often use, hence the "playing both sides of the fence" comment. Sorry if I misunderstood.
Dave
I wonder about these in terms of an older OS. I have came across these sites in the past but have not played any games off of them yet.One thing I can tell you, as a long time gamer, is that games made in the 20th century are not very creative.
The creative minds of the past, made, and still make the best games. So, if you want to find a game that's not a bundle of meaningless confusion... The only downside, is that most aren't cheap.
However, there are tons of freeware games out there... I just remembered... most people don't have Windows XP, or Windows 7, so most of those games won't play on a new Windows OS.
This is what I mean by getting left behind.
go read the chapters.. they talk all about it.Fortunately for me, you are not the One who can judge that.
I would however caution against believing that you can put yourself in His place by making such a claim.