B flat B♭
- By Apple Sky
- Conspiracy Theories
- 1544 Replies
Rinse & repeat my post # 1539
What do you mean rinse & repeat my post #1,539 ?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Rinse & repeat my post # 1539
It is relevant, as it reflects the character of someone supporting this policy. His stance appears to be "rule for thee but not for me."Irrelevant. The discussion is about what immigration policy is appropriate today.
I think so. You don't have to be a Christian to see the fighting and division of the current generation to realise something is wrong. It would make anyone think "Lets go back to the drawing board because maybe we missed something in the instruction manual because whatever they are doing, it ain't working" lol.Wonder if the Golden Rule will start trending with the newest generation. Things tend to go full circle,
Do you mean that god is alive? Just asking for clarity.
And Jesus kept the Sabbath wherever he was in His travels. Sundown varied depending on His location and the lay of the land, as it does now everywhere regardless of where we are in any given time zone.God said in Exodus 16:23 "tomorrow is the Sabbath". The one who trusts that God was so confused in Ex 16 so as not to know which day was the actual Sabbath in Gen 2:2-3 is trusting a straw theology of God.
For forty years in the wilderness the manna did not fall on "The Sabbath", the one who trusts that God was so confused for forty years so as not to know which day was the actual Sabbath in Gen 2:2-3 is trusting a straw theology of God.
Jesus kept the Sabbath according to Luke 4:16 and "all scripture is inspired by God" according to 2 Tim 3:16. The one who trusts that God the Holy Spirit was so confused in Luke 4 so as not to know which day was the actual Gen 2, Ex 20 Sabbath day, is trusting in a straw theology of God
The IDL was first determined in 1884 and not actually used until the 1900's.
Those who imagine that Sunday keeping and Sabbath keeping Christians as well as Jews all had their "day changed" either in 1884 or early in the 1900's , have a straw understanding of history and geography
Perhaps its the other way around. Refer to my last post and the evidence from several independent sources.All you have confirmed is an inability to read and comprehend.
There’s a Giant Flaw in Human History
lol I forgot there are certain trigger words. Like a word suddenly is what makes reality. Just mention the word and it all reality becomes the word. Like the word has magic powers. Not about "trigger words" its about you sloppy writing. If you don't mean "new age sprituality" don't use the term...www.christianforums.com
Yes, you ought to be shocked. The Bible doctrine of hell, is a very sobering and shocking doctrine to fresh converts and new commers. But I'm sure you will eventually come to the table. You can deny the doctrine, all, you want, but that will never change the truth of the matter.Oooooh, another eternal torment champion implicitly condemning us to hell simply because we don't share in his sick imaginations about what he personally thinks should happen to his enemies in the afterlife, sic burn! (No pun intended at that last part, Julie. XD )
I am shocked by this, I tell you!![]()
I never said there were any tests. I said the theorectic simulations were enough to warrant further testing and base new tech on. There were real science from the research that warrants further investigation and not dismissing.Read the study there were NO tests or experiments performed.
So why should I believe your opinion over the scientific write up lol. It seems all the so called "scientific write ups" are saying the same thing. Coming to the same conclusion as myself. The write up actually quotes the researchers.No again, this is just a popular scientific write up of the same study
So how is this not advanced knowledge. They are learning from the ancient Egyptian structures and methods to generate such waves and energy sources. Surely the structure, its location and the specifiuc way its build with certain stones was not just luck in producing such results.Which is just saying that they want to produce pyramidal antennas, if they are at a nanoscale it will not be radiowaves they are trying to interact with.
Ah peer review, peer review. Everything has to be peer reviewed. At least its a scientific paper. You are dismissing it without any peer review or even any scientific published article. Your doing exactly what I was pointing out was double standard.This is article has not been peer-reviewed (the pre-print even says so in it's watermarks), it tries to build a case for the connection between the shroud of Turin and the Giza pyramids. It contains no test or experimental work.
I think I may have linked this to show that the tech is possible. That research has shown that granite can be weakened by Piezoelectric Excitation. Along similar lines to the other research and tests showing Piezoelectric Phenomena and effects.Mentioned in the post you quoted before. There is no connection to egyptian pyramids, is there?
Show me the peer review that states there is no connection.No one of your articles has shown the utility of piezoelectrics in conjunction with the pyramids.
According to the findings they clearly state that there was human intervention.That was no confirmation! It is enough to make further tests interesting.
Yes there was. The hypothesis was.Conclusion from the pdf is that it may contain both natural and manmade blocks. No hypothesis testing was performed,
Near impossible. The magnetic moments happen as the stones are orientated. So natural stones from quarry to placement will undergo random orientations. Whereas the cast blocks being cast in situ will only have paralell orientation N to S as they have only been orientation in one position.so how probable was it that the magnetization directions would be observed by chance alone? Seven samples don't give them much to work with.
Thats 7 out of 7 which makes the odds atronomically high that all these blocks just happen to remain paralelle throughout the entire process from quarry to positioning. If they were chiselled and cut and hauled up the pyramid they are going to have random magnetic moments.No hypothesis testing was performed, so how probable was it that the magnetization directions would be observed by chance alone? Seven samples don't give them much to work with.
To apply the same standard you apply to me. The skeptics demans peer review and still reject it. They demand scientific evidence from formal sources with credible scientists.I read the article, they don't claim to have proved anything. What do you want me to do then?
Yes just like the idea of giant ramps and wooden sleds or cutting millions of blocks with chisels and copper saws. Why is it that the orthodoxy is accepted out of hand when its also spectulation. At least the idea of hydro lifting is more aligned to a realistic explanation and that the Egyptians were smarter than just using sheer human power.It is a suggestion. It even says so in the headline.
Theres enough evidence to say it was likely. Thats why I always go back to the images. I have shown you observation evidence of softened stone already and its been dismissed. This image is one of the actual blocks on the casing and you can see how it was soft.You're jumping the gun, let us see if others can replicate the findings.
Well the Romans were attributed with create cement. So this like other discoveries pushes back the timeline. But the research results seem to say that this was not just any old cement but one thats eco friendly and lasts longer than any other cement.Even if they were using some sort of cement, how does this follow? Cement-like (true cement with lime came a little later?) construction was known to the ancient egyptians, was it not?
Yes so I am saying that there was much more of a purpose for what they built than given credit for. The same principle but just more of it and more advanced than thought.What do you mean with "They all had a purpose associated with the data being collected."? That the egyptians built thing with a purpose in mind, that is more or less a given.
Lol its like they never resisted the idea and when it shows their orthodoxy wrong they pretend thats how science works. As though science never has a paradigm change. I think like all sciences this is exactly what is happening.Only in the sense, that new findings of course changes our current understanding. That is what science does.
Salvation is personal not a group decision. My statement still stands. No denomination, including Catholics, will ever save anyone.But of course.
Not without Jesus at the core they won't.
Ah, that Catholics are the original, supreme church nonsense, yada yada. Not going there with you.But the opposite of thinking a denomination saves is to have a religion of 'just Jesus and me'. Jesus didn't start anything like that.
You need to stop your Strawman. No where did I call ICE racist. It seems that you have a standard reply to anyone that disagrees with you. I’m not from the left. My issue is with the trampling of the 4th amendment. You know, the constitution? The same constitution that you should be defending?No you expect them to be constrained and prevented from ever thinking that the law needs to be enforced
Presence in the US without authorization is a civil offense
Re-entry after deportation is criminal. Entering through a non designated point of entry is criminal
Even if your argument is merely civil offenses, the civil penalty for unauthorized presence is deportation. Deporting for civil offenses is not unreasonable, criminal acts involve jail time and imprisonment. ICE is deporting, not imprisoning unless there is also concurrent criminal offenses.
Here illegally? Expect to be civilly deported. The government is even offering a free plane ticket and a thousand dollars for those who choose to self deport
Keeping ICE from enforcing the law does nothing to elevate Latino dignity. It even lowers it by giving the perception that as a group of people, they are exempt from the law. No society functions like that just because you call it racist
I'm not sure which verse or chapter of 2 Tess you're referring to, but I already know that it doesn't mean what your trying to suggest it's saying. I assume it saying those in hell will not enjoy communion with God, because He doesn't show them any mercy or love. All they see from God is His wrath and vengeance and torment.So, are you just avoiding the question here, or what? Does hell involve the absence of God’s presence, as maintained in 2 Thess, or not?
I am most interested in your last sentence, and would appreciate your expansion on it, if you're willing. Of the several kinds of parishes around, when it this test passed, and when is it failed, and when is it avoided? Of course some of us really have no viable choice in the matter - in which case it seems, God has chosen for us.My former parish has embraced the LGBTQ+ ideology. Conservatives and of course Trump
supporters, are convinced to leave. It doesn't matter if you don't support Trump, but as
long as they think you do, you're not welcomed.
This is when love and forgiveness is put to the test.
No it isn’t. You’re in denial again.
I have never read any of John Calvin's books, I'm too busy studying theology. In any case I'm sure Calvin, never claimed that God created some specific purpose of tormenting them in hell.Take a look at Institutes, Book 3, chap 21 to see what Calvin taught. For that matter, the doctrine of Limited Atonement necessitates that some are preordained for heaven and the rest for hell. And, BTW, no one but God knows with perfect certainty whose names are written in the Book of Life and whose are not. People can deceive themselves all day long on these matters.
No it isn’t. You’re in denial again.
No it isn’t. You’re in denial again.
No it isn’t. You’re in denial again.
No it isn’t. You’re in denial again.