Morality without Absolute Morality
- By Bradskii
- Ethics & Morality
- 844 Replies
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, well...that's then down to me. So three times is definitely not going to happen. I'm looking for a conversation.Nope, relativism denies that there is a real right and wrong and instead is about frameworks and cultural contexts dictating what is wrong in that particular relative frame. Contextualism/situationalism recognizes that there is an objective right and wrong but that what it is isn't always cut and dry and similar actions could lead to opposite conclusions depending on local factors.
You know, a kinda debate about the topic at hand. Where people put forward their viewpoints and question the other person on their position. Quite often that might take the form of an example that will highlight the topic and a question as to how the other person might respond. It's not like it's quite common in a debate. It's actually how debates operate.
You have excluded yourself from that until that situation changes.
Upvote
0
