Imagine that: deflecting to an absolute minor point, so to obfuscate the essence: that you try to smear science, and have only ridicue by lack of valid arguments.
Oh, I still gave you too much credit. I will assess you lower then.
According to Nebraska Man - Wikipedia , the name was first used by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1922, in a paper entitled 'Hesperopithecus, the first anthropoid primate found in North America', Science, 55 (427), 463-465.
The dishonest part came when creationists took that imaginative magazine cover, and pretended that scientists were claiming that they had evidence for what the fossil looked like.
It was found by a dinosaur specialist, who noted that the tooth was shaped very much like a primate tooth. When a mammal specialist took a look at it, he identified it as a the tooth of a peccary, which was oddly worn down in a way that made it look like that of an ape.
Science checks it's findings. Reproducibility is a big deal. Hence, the error was quickly found and corrected. The "wormhole" defense for distant supernovas will no doubt be circulating even though the facts won't support that belief.
If you get to call in an unscriptural miracle to cover all the flaws in your story then every story is equally plausible. "It was a miracle!!!!"
Nothing man can do, works better for explaining the physical universe. I get the jealousy, but it's misplaced.
Sorry, imaginary angel homes don't do any better.
Quite a fable.
