Gary K
an old small town kid
- Aug 23, 2002
- 4,397
- 962
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
As to what I emphasized and your question, yes I do. It shows God placed great emphasis on them.Again with the unbliblical dichotomising of the law. There is no basis to uniquely call the 10 moral law or to extract them out of the covenant they are created in.
God called the 4th commadment a sign of the covenant between God and Israel (Ex 31:13) and enscribed on it on "two tablets of the covenant law" (Ex 31:18) then placed them inside the ark of the covenant. Do you see a theme here?
The 4th commandment, and by extension the 10 commandments are defined within their covenant they are created in as is repeated multiple times. They are not uniquely moral law they are uniquely covenant law, a covenant we are not under. Calling them moral doesn't change that they are bound within their covenant. You can call them moral law with hot fudge sauce and a cherry on top and its still an unbliblical definition and it still doesn't change them.
Upvote
0