BobRyan said:
1. When I use the term "included in the moral law" it is not the same as your 'the only thing in the moral law". You realize that right?
2. The
Eph 6:2 statement by contrast only works with the Ten.
Thank you for that example of ignoring every scripture referenced in the post and also losing track of your own point in your prior post where you falsely claimed I argue that only the TEN are in the moral law of God.
Not true since we all know Heb 10 distinctly puts and end to the laws for animal sacrifice and offerings.
this is not even a little bit confusing.
Which is what you falsely claimed and is what I refuted in my post where you simply ignore every detail in it.
Not sure how ignoring the details in my every post is supposed to demonstrate a convincing argument in your position.
Surely your position could be supported while actually paying attention to the actual point I made in the post even if you differ with it.
I simply point out that just as the case in your post above - you are not paying attention to the argument in the post that I provided and simply ignoring every text posted - is not the great help you seem to have supposed it to be.
The wild notion that "actually paying attention to the details in the posts" is a "form of legalism" -- is a bit surprising.