Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
I cannot address it yet
you are stuck in doubting the premise
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
There are consequences
Time may reset to the past
I am preparing for such a possibility
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
I've asked 6 or 7 times now, and you still haven't answered: why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
Enough…
Do not throw pearls to pigs
I've asked 6 or 7 times now, and you still haven't answered …
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
You’re trying to debunk
Let me help you and say…
You should not believe
That is what "skepticism" is. Not accepting on empty air. Testing. Trying to find flaws. "Debunking", if possible.
You’re trying to debunk
Let me help you and say…
You should not believe
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
Because he never does. He cannot. He knows that he cannot
You have no idea what "consider" means. Just as you have no idea what "skepticism" means. Or "mundane". Or consequence. Or reality.
You were given the opportunity to consider this idea
Now go back to the mundane world
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?
Don’t worry about it
I’m not going to reply anymore
Why do you never address the consequences of your claims?