Yet the car we drive only delivers on 1% of the energy you feed into that car. So if that is your claim that science gave us the car then science is very inefficient. Next what about the people who have died in cars, or been disabled for life. Next what about the global warming from the use of a car to burn fossil fuel. There are cities like Amsterdam that say enough is enough and there is a very popular trend to go back to riding a bicycle. Also what is wrong with Electric cars that people have to burn up fossil fuel and damage the world we live in. Did you know that the Bible says God will destroy those who destroy the world? So as a Christian we try to be careful NOT to destroy the world we live in. Even Obama must think there is some sort of a problem, because he went to a lot of trouble to destroy the engines in cars he felt were wasting to much fossil fuel. So I could answer your question with IF Science had not given us a fossil fuel car, then maybe we would all have to use electric cars and that would save a lot of lives and not harm our environment as much. Maybe if you would say science gave us an electric motor with a lithium battery to make it easier to ride a bicycle, then maybe I would rejoice with you.The car you drive couldn't have been made without science,
Upvote
0