Frankie said:I believe their are saved Catholics just as there are saved people from all walks of life, however, I do believe that the Catholic religion has so much extra Biblical stuff that I would never encourage anyone to join it.
No one is engaging you on what Baptist soteriology is . .no one has commented on it or attacked it . .bleechers said:You know, I've spent countless hours doing just that... then I was convicted by Paul's admonitions to avoid such things (my pride is what keeps me going). I have had to discern the difference between "seekers" and "disputers" (my definitions, I know, but useful to explain here).
Now, I try to keep to "the simplicity which is in Christ" (2 Cor 11) instead of arguing over the word "know" and what "know" really means... etc.
My point, in this Baptist room, is to note that Catholic (Orthodox, et al) soteriology is not compatible with Evangelical soteriology. That was my goal. In that, I find myself having to "debate" several posts at the same time (and I'm a lousy typist).
Nope .. for we believe in salvation by Grace alone ..Can we at least agree that RC soteriology is not compatible with salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ's atonement alone according to the scriptures alone?
Not at all.In fact, that Trent condemns such doctrines?
Your PUC serves only to create division, misunderstanding and hostility . .nothing more . . if that is the purpose you intend for it to serve, then God have mercy.If I could get the RCs (et al) in the forum to agree to that, then the PUC has served its purpose.
I will pray for you that God helps you with the issue of your pride.My pride would move me to defend every name in the geneology of Noah, but to what end? No one is interested in the finished work of Christ here. No one seeks fogiveness by Christ alone. Any wrangling I do with 2, 3, 4, or 5 of you is "vain babbling" and fruitless.
It sems then that you did not understand the arguments you made .. or you did not make the same arguments I make.I know all your arguments (intimately), I made them for years and I now reject them for the knowledge of salvation. You know our arguments and you reject them for your church's dogma. What do we hope to accomplish anymore?
What do we accomplish? I challange you to find in the OBOB forum a thread like this one about the false teachings of Baptists . .
What you are accomplishing is division based on falsehood, not truth . .
Peace in Him!
I know Liz, I know . . but I couldn't resist . . .Crazy Liz said:"official teaching of the Baptist Church..."
ROTFL!
Would it be within the rules if I told you politely that Catholic is a Christian Faith, not a religion?
Then please expalin to me what sets your profession of the human and divine natures of Christ apart from that of Nestorius?bleechers said:Nestorians, eh? Nice try.
I have clearly stated (as the Council of Ephesus stated for what it's worth) that Christ consisted of only one person with two natures, one human and one divine. This is the same charge always leveled by Rome.
Liz? Where are you?
Jesus had no body as eternal God and Son. A body was prepared for Him. Mary gave birth to that Body, but the deity was, is, and forever shall be separate from his humanity. He is fully God and fully man.