Thyroid Cancer
- By Rescued One
- Prayer Wall
- 9 Replies
Thank you so much for the prayers. Her mom says she's doing okay. I tried to call but her mailbox is full.
Upvote
0
For decades now, the generally accepted best estimate of the age of the Universe has been 13.8bn years, not 13.5...Well, the JWST (James Webb Space Telescope) was delayed for several years past what was planned six years ago when I posted this response in 2017. The JWST was finally launched on Christmas Day 2021. Fast forward to February 2023, and just as I predicted in my post, the JWST has just viewed six objects from the dawn of the beginning of the big bang which appear to be galaxies larger and older than our 13.5 Gyr Milky Way. Here's an NBC interview covering the discovery:
James Webb Space Telescope images shatter understanding of age of the universe
The James Webb Space Telescope found six massive galaxies that some scientists never thought could exist. The telescope is so powerful it might have just shattered scientific understanding of the universe. Theoretical Physicist and best selling author Dr. Michio Kaku talked to Gadi Schwartz...www.nbcnews.com
That seems to me almost the opposite of what the OP article is describing. With the Iron Law, people will "go along to get along" to maintain the bureaucracy. Members will tend towards sycophancy, not rebellion.
Also includes where Pope Francis lives.The rescript, which was posted in the Vatican following a Feb. 13 meeting with Pope Francis, says housing perks for high-level Vatican officials are being cut to meet the growing needs of the Church in an economic context ‘of particular gravity.’
Continued below.
Pope Francis Cuts Free and Discounted Rent for Cardinals, Vatican Managers
The rescript, which was posted in the Vatican following a Feb. 13 meeting with Pope Francis, says housing perks for high-level Vatican officials are being cut to meet the growing needs of the Church in an economic context ‘of particular gravity.’www.ncregister.com
In fact, a Consecrated Host and Blood [once wine] were kept in the Church since 800s when a doubting clergy member consecrated it and it turned to the Flesh and Blood before his eyes.Just an observation, if transubstantiation were true, you would be able to detect its material in the stomach and with analysis etc.
Yeah I meant more in the eternal stateIn Heaven or in The World To Come? In the renewed Earth I believe so, as @ViaCrucis says so eloquently. In Heaven itself as your question asks, no I don't think so. I have not seen a lot of evidence in scripture that Heaven functions like Earth in an Earthly economy as it were. But I am certainly open to be wrong on that point.
Oh lookie, here’s some of that “systemic racism” that doesn’t exist nowadays:
Didn’t matter if they were legal or not, if they were Latino, they got the boot.
“For years I’ve been watching leftist Democrats cancel people, places, and things for things that have happened in the past 250 years,”’ said Ingoglia. “I thought it was hypocritical that you have these Democrats wanting to remove statues or rename buildings because of things that tie back to slavery. Well, under that same metric, then, the Florida Democrat, the Democrat Party itself, should be canceled.”
Found this thread after you wrote such good posts in reply to mine in another thread about the meaning of death (not the OP subject, exactly). And I think the subjects cross over.SOLA FIDE-WHAT’S IT ALL ABOUT?
I recently had some "discussions", to put it nicely, on the forums with a member who insisted that he was perfected in love, apparently perfect in all things, because certain biblical passages seem to indicate that a born again person is promised perfection instantly upon his rebirth. I repeatedly asked if his acquaintances would agree, or if, in any case, he/she was perfectly sinless, no white lies or stray thoughts, etc, ever, every single moment. I never got a direct, straight answer on that but was pointed to certain passages that could be interpreted as to assert perfection now rather than perfection as a goal.
What I came away with, however, reading between the lines, was probably a slightly different position, in truth. It appears that he thought it would be sinful, a denial of faith, to believe otherwise, a denial of Christ to believe that we're not perfected as we come to believe, such that if one doesn't claim and continuously appropriate this perfection by faith, they would be outside of God's will. This is a foreign and ugly position to me, to claim to be righteous when, in fact, one is not. But the doctrine of Sola Fide, with its associated doctrine of imputed righteousness, can be understood to support his view, I suppose.
Anyway, I'm left with the following concepts involving the doctrine of SF:
- Personal, actual righteousness is no longer required in order to be considered just or righteous in the eyes of God-He sees only the righteousness of Christ in us when we come to believe. That faith is in God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, through faith in His Son and in the forgiveness of sin that He accomplished for us. We simply need to believe-possibly only as a one-time event -or as a continuously maintained act depending on theology.
- Since justice/righteousness are strictly imputed and not given, there's a question as to whether or not a believer can lose salvation, since his justification is not based on-or results in- his personally possessed righteousness to begin with.
- Even though man stands righteous before God as a forensic declaration, he may or may not be given the ability to become actually sanctified/holy-but that holiness would only be a sort of "side-benefit" anyway, not required to be saved. Man may or may not be obligated to, for example, obey the law/commandments, even if/when done by the Spirit, now under grace. Some theologies insist that the saved man will necessarily be righteous anyway, sort of covering that base, while others at an opposite extreme seem to almost treat the law as evil, and view any requirement for right living as a denial of grace, some even maintaining that no degree of sin could ever separate a believer from God.
Any thoughts here? I'm not particularly favorable towards the doctrine, as may be obvious. But I'm not sure how to best understand it, either.
At a minimum, it's got to be a violation of whatever contractual obligations Fox had with the Biden campaign. I'm covered under NDA's that prevent me from talking publicly about anything I'm working on before it's announced, even if anybody with half a brain could guess what it is (e.g. sequels, expansions). I can't imagine a political campaign doesn't have something at least as strong preventing broadcasters from spreading their content before the embargo is lifted.Is that illegal or merely unethical?
Thank youI just realized the document you need translation for. I’ll try to read all but it is a lot.
I was reading what is already translated and there are minor tweaks but overall is good.
L4H