The poster was very clearly dispensing unscriptural advice, and I respectfully asked him to take it elsewhere. Is this flaming? I honestly had to look up the definition on Wikipedia, as Websters definition didn't really fit the accusation (I loathe Wikipedia btw)AMBASSADOR HAT
A reminder to everyone that Requests for Christian Advice is a non-debate forum. From the forum SOP:
@Hoping2, you need to stop debating please.
@Simonides, this post is borderline flaming since you accused a member of giving incorrect advice, which may have started the regrettable debate:
Again, from the forum statement of purpose:
If you see someone posting advice that is against the site Statement of Faith, the proper thing to do is to report that to the moderators of the site as a Statement of Purpose Violation, not to flame them and begin violating more rules.
All further posts in this thread need to be about helping David, not about debating about how we are reassured of salvation. If you wish to debate that, please open a new topic in Soteriology DEBATE. Thanks!
Here's what I found;
Flaming, also known as roasting, is the act of posting insults, often including profanity or other offensive language, on the internet.[1] Flaming is distinct from trolling, which is the act of someone causing discord online or in person. Flaming emerges from the anonymity that Internet forums provide for users which allows them to act more aggressively.
I assure you, I did not insult this brother. If its insults you are looking for, they are literally everywhere in this forum. I can also assure you that anonymity had nothing to do with my response. I'm no different face to face, ask anyone who knows me.
I was however, very direct.
Telling a young man that he cannot now, nor will he ever in this lifetime KNOW whether or not he has been saved is the height of scriptural irresponsibility.
I know that love is not rude, and if I came off as such I apologize. But there is also such a thing as context, which you conveniently overlooked.
"Friend, I'm trying really hard to help this young man. You and I can debate later if you wish. Please pray for us. Thank you."
I understand that we live in very sensitive times with lots of sensitive people milling about. If only they were more sensitive to the Holy Spirit, they might be less offended, and more useful in His service. I was not aware of your rules against debate in an advisory thread, but its a great rule. Am I seriously being chastised for inadvertently enforcing it? That's funny right there.
"Oh you foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you?"
Spoken by the same guy that told us "love is not rude."
Thank you for putting and end to the debate, better late than never. Hopefully young David returns to finish our conversation.
If you are going to moderate, moderate.
If you need more volunteers, please ask.
This is very serious business, planting seeds and watering souls. I'm sure you agree. Its like fishing, I might have let one off the hook today because a lot of background noise.
Yes, I was irritated. And a bit curt. I'll try harder next time.
But all I wanted was to help that young man into the same
understanding of the Father heart of God that I myself have been blessed with. Who knows if any of us will ever get that opportunity again?
This is warfare, not politics. You're problem is with the camel eaters, not me.
Much love and much peace in Christ Jesus.
Upvote
0