• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

Thinking about becoming a Seventh Day Adventist

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
Hi all! I ran across a guy named Doug Batchelor on YouTube. He's a Seventh Day Adventist and I've been listening/watching him. It is becoming clear to me that I can easily agree with the beliefs. Any advice?

TIA
You wrote that post many years ago, so I don’t know what you’re up to. I m a SDA about to send a letter to the conference to be removed from their lists. I was baptized in 2018 and since then read the Bible from the beginning to the end over and over. I ve also read many Ellen White books. I ve come to the conclusion that all their theories about 1844 are wrong and don’t fit with the Bible. Reading Paul is a big eye opening. They couldn t prove me wrong. And I talked to people at the top of the Adventist church. I was told that many don’t believe in it either but they remain in the church (Positions? pay checks? Friends?)
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,356
5,207
USA
✟654,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You wrote that post many years ago, so I don’t know what you’re up to. I m a SDA about to send a letter to the conference to be removed from their lists. I was baptized in 2018 and since then read the Bible from the beginning to the end over and over. I ve also read many Ellen White books. I ve come to the conclusion that all their theories about 1844 are wrong and don’t fit with the Bible. Reading Paul is a big eye opening. They couldn t prove me wrong. And I talked to people at the top of the Adventist church. I was told that many don’t believe in it either but they remain in the church (Positions? pay checks? Friends?)
Hey there.

I am an SDA Christian and sorry this was your experience. There is a shaking going on the in church many will leave, many will come in. Unfortunately, not everyone who claims to be SDA is SDA and I have experienced this firsthand. I came from Pastor Batchelor's church which was so biblical and when I moved to another state and was surprised how different the churches were. Sometimes I felt like I was in a Sunday church where emotion, music etc took precedence over sound doctrine. After a year of search, I am blessed to have found one that is centered on God's Word and such warm fellowship. Sadly a lot of progressive people have come into the church wanting to change it and we have to remember even Jesus had a Judas. Just curious if your desire to leave the SDA has led you not to believe in the 4th commandment, as there is other seventh day commandment keeping churches out there.

I would suggest you make a post in the Traditional Adventist forum on your questions about Paul. Traditional Adventists

I know we would be happy to answer them as best we can. I personally believe what a lot of people do with Paul's writings is isolate them and never try to reconcile them to what Jesus taught and lived. Paul was a servant of Christ and never undermined His authority Mat 28:18, he had a way with speech that was difficult to understand even in his time and some people are comfortable having Paul contradict himself and Jesus, but I think if we dive deeper, we will see if actually harmonizes perfectly with Christ. I am happy to try to answer any of these questions, this forum is not the place for it, but if you want to post something here Traditional Adventists I am sure a few of us would be happy to discuss.


Regarding 1844 if you have the time, here is a study that goes through this timeline and how it matches the bible perfectly. Its long 112 30 minute episodes with 2 pastors and 2 lay people going through each chapter of Revelation and Daniel and will take you through the timeline all by the bible.

 
Upvote 0

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
Hey there.

I am an SDA Christian and sorry this was your experience. There is a shaking going on the in church many will leave, many will come in. Unfortunately, not everyone who claims to be SDA is SDA and I have experienced this firsthand. I came from Pastor Batchelor's church which was so biblical and when I moved to another state and was surprised how different the churches were. Sometimes I felt like I was in a Sunday church where emotion, music etc took precedence over sound doctrine. After a year of search, I am blessed to have found one that is centered on God's Word and such warm fellowship. Sadly a lot of progressive people have come into the church wanting to change it and we have to remember even Jesus had a Judas. Just curious if your desire to leave the SDA has led you not to believe in the 4th commandment, as there is other seventh day commandment keeping churches out there.

I would suggest you make a post in the Traditional Adventist forum on your questions about Paul. Traditional Adventists

I know we would be happy to answer them as best we can. I personally believe what a lot of people do with Paul's writings is isolate them and never try to reconcile them to what Jesus taught and lived. Paul was a servant of Christ and never undermined His authority Mat 28:18, he had a way with speech that was difficult to understand even in his time and some people are comfortable having Paul contradict himself and Jesus, but I think if we dive deeper, we will see if actually harmonizes perfectly with Christ. I am happy to try to answer any of these questions, this forum is not the place for it, but if you want to post something here Traditional Adventists I am sure a few of us would be happy to discuss.


Regarding 1844 if you have the time, here is a study that goes through this timeline and how it matches the bible perfectly. Its long 112 30 minute episodes with 2 pastors and 2 lay people going through each chapter of Revelation and Daniel and will take you through the timeline all by the bible.

Hello…. Thank you very much for taking time to answer. I m grateful to adventists because they helped me understand the Bible very well and pushed me to read and ask questions about it. I talked to the seventh day baptists but they don’t have many churches. This is to answer your question about the 4th commandment. I still believe it’s better to rest on Sabbath, the physical one but my aim is the eternel Sabbath with God. Jesus is the new alliance we have with God and Paul wrote that whatever day we worship is not a big deal. The church I was baptized at has drifted too far from God : adultery, living or not with a lover, working on sabbaths (all those ones having a position in the church!)and inviting the members to go to a catholic church to watch “the chosen”. I talked to the pastor and she replied she was backed by the conference. I went to another church where predications are at a very low level. one Saturday a month they close the church having a gathering on Friday evening because they want to spend their time with their family and friends.
thank you for the link to watch the video but I read Daniel 8 and 9 in hebrew too and I know very well what 1844 is about. I ve also read books Ellen G. White wrote where some statements she made where absolutely not biblical. it would be very long to give examples here. I can just finish with a pastor telling me “I blindly believe in 1844! I can’t prove you wrong”. Many don’t believe in those theories and won’t say it publicly . They told me privately.
I want to end positively. This debate isn’t going to give us salvation or not (which is our aim, to all of us). It’s just very sad…but we have to go on adoring God, keeping His commandments And the faith in Jesus
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,356
5,207
USA
✟654,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Hello…. Thank you very much for taking time to answer. I m grateful to adventists because they helped me understand the Bible very well and pushed me to read and ask questions about it. I talked to the seventh day baptists but they don’t have many churches. This is to answer your question about the 4th commandment. I still believe it’s better to rest on Sabbath, the physical one but my aim is the eternel Sabbath with God. Jesus is the new alliance we have with God and Paul wrote that whatever day we worship is not a big deal. The church I was baptized at has drifted too far from God : adultery, living or not with a lover, working on sabbaths (all those ones having a position in the church!)and inviting the members to go to a catholic church to watch “the chosen”. I talked to the pastor and she replied she was backed by the conference. I went to another church where predications are at a very low level. one Saturday a month they close the church having a gathering on Friday evening because they want to spend their time with their family and friends.
thank you for the link to watch the video but I read Daniel 8 and 9 in hebrew too and I know very well what 1844 is about. I ve also read books Ellen G. White wrote where some statements she made where absolutely not biblical. it would be very long to give examples here. I can just finish with a pastor telling me “I blindly believe in 1844! I can’t prove you wrong”. Many don’t believe in those theories and won’t say it publicly . They told me privately.
I want to end positively. This debate isn’t going to give us salvation or not (which is our aim, to all of us). It’s just very sad…but we have to go on adoring God, keeping His commandments And the faith in Jesus
Thanks for the message back!

I would happy to look at the verses you have in mind you think Paul is saying not keeping the Sabbath matters anymore. We should worship God 24/7 365 but Jesus related true worship to keeping His commandments Rev 14:12 and false worship with keeping traditions over the commandments of God Mat 15:3-14 I do not believe Paul is countermanding the teachings of Jesus, but as stated, he says things in a way that can be hard to understand 2 Peter 3:16. This forum is not a debate forum, but I would be happy to discuss with you in the Traditional Adventist forum.

Consider posting your questions on 1844 here Traditional Adventists. The videos I posted goes over it as well. Like I said, not all SDA's are SDA's sadly, and to me this is a version of breaking one of God's commandments as being a false witness. Luckily God will sort all of that out soon enough along with said Christians being in adulterous relationships etc. Its why we shouldn't look to others as what they are doing or not doing, but keep our eyes on Christ. :)

Thanks for being friendly and I wish you nothing but the best! :)
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
52,752
11,626
Georgia
✟1,054,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You wrote that post many years ago, so I don’t know what you’re up to. I m a SDA about to send a letter to the conference to be removed from their lists. I was baptized in 2018 and since then read the Bible from the beginning to the end over and over. I ve also read many Ellen White books. I ve come to the conclusion that all their theories about 1844 are wrong
You have free will of course and can choose anything you wish.
Reading Paul is a big eye opening
Indeed he is a great Christian of faith and was inspired by God to write a good deal of the New Testament.
. They couldn t prove me wrong.
I suppose that is theoretically possible depending on the topic and who you contact.
And I talked to people at the top of the Adventist church.
such as? One of our leading scholars?
I was told that many don’t believe in it
I don't know of any Adventists who don't believe in the Bible, new testament, Gospel etc.
either but they remain in the church (Positions? pay checks? Friends?)
I don't know of any Adventist in leadership who claims that at his position - but I suppose it is theoretically possible, I have only been a member for about 55 years - so there could be a situation out there that I am still now aware of.
 
Upvote 0

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
You have free will of course and can choose anything you wish.

Indeed he is a great Christian of faith and was inspired by God to write a good deal of the New Testament.

I suppose that is theoretically possible depending on the topic and who you contact.

such as? One of our leading scholars?

I don't know of any Adventists who don't believe in the Bible, new testament, Gospel etc.

I don't know of any Adventist in leadership who claims that at his position - but I suppose it is theoretically possible, I have only been a member for about 55 years - so there could be a situation out there that I am still now aware of.
Hi Bob… So as to answer your questions. I was last year teaching as a volunteer at the adventist university in Mexico so I could talk to different pastors and one was a theology professor and pastor for a few churches, another was a pastor and doctor in communication. I met last summer Jacques Doukhan, at the head of the Old Testament department at Andrews university and the Bible commentaries. None could answer …
 
Upvote 0

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
Hi Bob… So as to answer your questions. I was last year teaching as a volunteer at the adventist university in Mexico so I could talk to different pastors and one was a theology professor and pastor for a few churches, another was a pastor and doctor in communication. I met last summer Jacques Doukhan, at the head of the Old Testament department at Andrews university and the Bible commentaries. None could answer …
Luckily all the Adventists believe in the Bible! Many among them hide their beliefs about Ellen G. white however.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
52,752
11,626
Georgia
✟1,054,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Hi Bob… So as to answer your questions. I was last year teaching as a volunteer at the adventist university in Mexico so I could talk to different pastors and one was a theology professor and pastor for a few churches, another was a pastor and doctor in communication. I met last summer Jacques Doukhan, at the head of the Old Testament department at Andrews university and the Bible commentaries.
Interesting - I too attended Andrews University.

I am pretty good friends with Dr. Carl Cosaert a leading scholar in the church and head of the Adventist Theological Society as well as some other think tank groups - in recent years. I am also pretty good friends with Clifford Goldstein former head of Religious Liberty and currently Editor of the Sabbath School quarterly. My uncle was editor of one of our main denominational magazine "These Times" that is now "Signs of the Times".

I find the people I know to be fairly well informed.
None could answer …
Answer what?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
52,752
11,626
Georgia
✟1,054,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Luckily all the Adventists believe in the Bible!
True. We have the sola scriptura method of testing and establishing the doctrine of our 28 Fundamental Beliefs.
Many among them hide their beliefs about Ellen G. white however.
My mother used to get most of her understanding from what God had revealed to Ellen White, but before she died I finally got her to join the rest of us in seeking to know what the Bible says as the primary source. So no doubt you can find that sort of situation if you look for it.
 
Upvote 0

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
Interesting - I too attended Andrews University.

I am pretty good friends with Dr. Carl Cosaert a leading scholar in the church and head of the Adventist Theological Society as well as some other think tank groups - in recent years. I am also pretty good friends with Clifford Goldstein former head of Religious Liberty and currently Editor of the Sabbath School quarterly. My uncle was editor of one of our main denominational magazine "These Times" that is now "Signs of the Times".

I find the people I know to be fairly well informed.

Answer what?
giving me a proof showing that they could use an information given in Daniel 9 and adapt it to Daniel 8 and thus come to that date 1843 and then 1844. I read those 2 chapters in hebrew. There’s NO-connection possible. Clifford Goldstein, in his book 1844, says “it s obvious”
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
52,752
11,626
Georgia
✟1,054,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
giving me a proof showing that they could use an information given in Daniel 9 and adapt it to Daniel 8
1. Daniel 9 proves beyond all doubt that the "day for year" principle is being used for apocalyptic prophecy and this is agreed to by almost all Christian denominations. The 70 weeks of Dan 9 are 70 days - and that means 70 years because it uses the day-for-year principle (See classic "Historicist" method used by most protestant groups until the mid 1800's.)

2. Dan 8 ends with Daniel claiming to be very very confused about some details in Dan 8 that are missing (such as the start point - missing in Dan 8) . See 8:27

27 Then I, Daniel, was exhausted and sick for days. Then I got up again and carried on the king’s business; but I was astounded at the vision, and there was none to explain it.​

3. Dan 9 introduces Gabriel as the one sent to give the asked-for explanation "of the vision" See Dan 9:20-24

20 Now while I was speaking and praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before the Lord my God in behalf of the holy mountain of my God, 21 while I was still speaking in prayer, then the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision previously, came to me in my extreme weariness about the time of the evening offering. 22 He gave me instruction and talked with me and said, “O Daniel, I have now come forth to give you insight with understanding. 23 At the beginning of your supplications the command was issued, and I have come to tell you, for you are highly esteemed; so give heed to the message and gain understanding of the vision.

Gain understanding - of "what vision"?
IT is the one in 8:27 about which Daniel was so concerned and needing an explanation

The missing start point for Dan 8 - is given in Dan 9

Dan 9:25 So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;​

69 weeks (483 days = 483 years) from the 457 BC Decree in Ezra 7:1-6 - until the Mark 1:14-15 "Time is fulfilled" statement of Christ as He starts His ministry as the Messiah.

This is merely the "A,B,C" basics in our typical Bible study series that we promote all up and down the street. I am a bit confused as to how the SDA University professors in your area are not familiar with it.

and thus come to that date 1843 and then 1844. I read those 2 chapters in hebrew.
Then the details I have highlighted above should be familiar. Most people do not need to read Hebrew to see the point, but it is nice that you have been trained in reading the Hebrew language.

Clifford Goldstein, in his book 1844, says “it s obvious”
I have to agree with him on that one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Freth

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2020
1,606
1,945
Midwest, USA
✟514,470.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Daniel 8 and 9:
  • Two time prophecies.
  • Visions given to Daniel.
  • Visitations by Gabriel to give Daniel interpretation.
  • The only part of the Daniel 8 vision not explained is the 2300 day prophecy.
  • The vision is shut up until a future time.
  • Daniel does not understand at least part of the vision (most likely the part not explained by Gabriel; 2300 day prophecy).
  • No start time given for the 2300 day prophecy in Daniel 8.
  • Gabriel appears in Daniel 9 to give Daniel skill and understanding concerning time prophecy. Specifically, the one that he didn't understand in Daniel 8.
  • Gabriel explains the 70 week prophecy and the event that marks the start of both time prophecies—the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem in 457 BC (Ezra 7).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
Daniel 8 and 9:
  • Two time prophecies.
  • Visions given to Daniel.
  • Visitations by Gabriel to give Daniel interpretation.
  • The only part of the Daniel 8 vision not explained is the 2300 day prophecy.
  • The vision is shut up until a future time.
  • Daniel does not understand at least part of the vision (most likely the part not explained by Gabriel; 2300 day prophecy).
  • No start time given for the 2300 day prophecy in Daniel 8.
  • Gabriel appears in Daniel 9 to give Daniel skill and understanding concerning time prophecy. Specifically, the one that he didn't understand in Daniel 8.
  • Gabriel explains the 70 week prophecy and the event that marks the start of both time prophecies—the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem in 457 BC (Ezra 7).
Where do you see that the explanation is about a vision that is 3 years old? Gabriel is giving Daniel a new vision and the explanation that goes with it.
. "Therefore seal up the vision" Daniel 8:26 "For it refers to many days in the future."
. Daniel 9:23 "At the beginning of your supplications the command went out, and I have come to tell you, for you are greatly beloved; therefore consider the matter, and understand the vision:" What is the beginning of the supplication ? The beginning of the chapter ! which is a prayer for his people. Verse 17 is clear about what is the supplication " Now therefore, our God, hear the prayer of Your servant, and his supplications". When he says "understand the vision". Right there is the vision! and it NEVER says that it refers to the other one given 3 years ago.
 
Upvote 0

Isabelle30900

Active Member
Apr 2, 2025
40
7
61
Nimes
✟1,744.00
Country
France
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Widowed
1. Daniel 9 proves beyond all doubt that the "day for year" principle is being used for apocalyptic prophecy and this is agreed to by almost all Christian denominations. The 70 weeks of Dan 9 are 70 days - and that means 70 years because it uses the day-for-year principle (See classic "Historicist" method used by most protestant groups until the mid 1800's.)

2. Dan 8 ends with Daniel claiming to be very very confused about some details in Dan 8 that are missing (such as the start point - missing in Dan 8) . See 8:27

27 Then I, Daniel, was exhausted and sick for days. Then I got up again and carried on the king’s business; but I was astounded at the vision, and there was none to explain it.​

3. Dan 9 introduces Gabriel as the one sent to give the asked-for explanation "of the vision" See Dan 9:20-24

20 Now while I was speaking and praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before the Lord my God in behalf of the holy mountain of my God, 21 while I was still speaking in prayer, then the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision previously, came to me in my extreme weariness about the time of the evening offering. 22 He gave me instruction and talked with me and said, “O Daniel, I have now come forth to give you insight with understanding. 23 At the beginning of your supplications the command was issued, and I have come to tell you, for you are highly esteemed; so give heed to the message and gain understanding of the vision.

Gain understanding - of "what vision"?
IT is the one in 8:27 about which Daniel was so concerned and needing an explanation

The missing start point for Dan 8 - is given in Dan 9

Dan 9:25 So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;​

69 weeks (483 days = 483 years) from the 457 BC Decree in Ezra 7:1-6 - until the Mark 1:14-15 "Time is fulfilled" statement of Christ as He starts His ministry as the Messiah.

This is merely the "A,B,C" basics in our typical Bible study series that we promote all up and down the street. I am a bit confused as to how the SDA University professors in your area are not familiar with it.


Then the details I have highlighted above should be familiar. Most people do not need to read Hebrew to see the point, but it is nice that you have been trained in reading the Hebrew language.


I have to agree with him on that one.
. Please read my answer to Freth.
. What do you think of Jesus when he said in Matthew 24:36 "However, no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself." For 2 years (1843-1844) William Miller and Ellen G. White were foretelling the date of Jesus retrun.
. Where is Jesus Christ right now ? Where was he in 1844 ? Where did he go when he ascended to His Father and sent us the Holy Spirit ?
. Please, understand I don't want to be negative or turn down anyone. I've been searching the Bible over and over and reading Ellen G. White to see how her teachings fit. But they don't. Besides this, you need to know that the church, here in south of France, is like Babylone. At the board, you have :
- someone who comitted adultery and has been living for years with her lover without being married.
- 2 persons who work on Sabbath as social workers.
Among those who have postions, you have :
- A woman who has been hunting men, whether they're in couple or not, but secretly
- A man having sex with another woman from church. Everybody knows it.
- Books are sold on sabbaths at church
- The pastor wrote inviting everyone to go and watch "The Chosen" at a catholic church.
I talked to the pastor about all these facts and she said it was all right!

The southern conference has asked the adventist manager of the youth camp/seminary/lecture- meeting place/ restaurant/hotel to sign his work contract accepting to work on Saturdays!
- I moved and went to another church. I tried to be persistent, turn my head the other side and go ahead with adventists but discovered that this other church closes one Saturday a month because they want to spend time with their friends and family.

My letter has just been sent. I'm leaving Babylone... My heart is crying. I love all my brothers and sisters. I love you all. But I'm honest and can't bear this burden anymore. God has told me 3 times this last month to do it. It's done...
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,356
5,207
USA
✟654,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
. Please read my answer to Freth.
. What do you think of Jesus when he said in Matthew 24:36 "However, no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself." For 2 years (1843-1844) William Miller and Ellen G. White were foretelling the date of Jesus retrun.
This is not true, it was not EGW who made the prediction, she was not an Adventist then, she was a Methodist and 17 years old. It was William Miller who made the prediction who was a Baptist minister and he got the timeline right, just the prophecy wrong, the timeline came from God through Scripture and He promises some will understand it, it was about the cleansing of the sanctuary in heaven, not the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, which you are correct no man will know the day. why the book referred to in Revelation about Daniel was sweet in the mouth but became bittersweet. However Jesus gave us prophecy so we would know the signs of His soon return.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Freth

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2020
1,606
1,945
Midwest, USA
✟514,470.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
This is not true, it was not EGW who made the prediction, she was not an Adventist them, she was a Methodist and 17 years old. It was William Miller who made the prediction who was a Baptist minister and he got the timeline right, just the prophecy wrong, the timeline came from God through Scripture and He promises some will understand it, it was about the cleansing of the sanctuary in heaven, not the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, which you are correct no man will know the day. why the book referred to in Revelation about Daniel was sweet in the mouth but became bittersweet. However Jesus gave us prophecy so we would know the signs of His soon return.

This. Read The Great Controversy, Chapter 18 - An American Reformer. Ellen explains how William Miller determined what he did concerning the 2300 day prophecy. Here's an excerpt.

The prophecy which seemed most clearly to reveal the time of the second advent was that of Daniel 8:14: “Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.” Following his rule of making Scripture its own interpreter, Miller learned that a day in symbolic prophecy represents a year ( Numbers 14:34; Ezekiel 4:6); he saw that the period of 2300 prophetic days, or literal years, would extend far beyond the close of the Jewish dispensation, hence it could not refer to the sanctuary of that dispensation. Miller accepted the generally received view that in the Christian age the earth is the sanctuary, and he therefore understood that the cleansing of the sanctuary foretold in Daniel 8:14 represented the purification of the earth by fire at the second coming of Christ. If, then, the correct starting point could be found for the 2300 days, he concluded that the time of the second advent could be readily ascertained. Thus would be revealed the time of that great consummation, the time when the present state, with “all its pride and power, pomp and vanity, wickedness and oppression, would come to an end;” when the curse would be “removed from off the earth, death be destroyed, reward be given to the servants of God, the prophets and saints, and them who fear His name, and those be destroyed that destroy the earth.”—Bliss, page 76. { GC 324.3}​
With a new and deeper earnestness, Miller continued the examination of the prophecies, whole nights as well as days being devoted to the study of what now appeared of such stupendous importance and all-absorbing interest. In the eighth chapter of Daniel he could find no clue to the starting point of the 2300 days; the angel Gabriel, though commanded to make Daniel understand the vision, gave him only a partial explanation. As the terrible persecution to befall the church was unfolded to the prophet’s vision, physical strength gave way. He could endure no more, and the angel left him for a time. Daniel “fainted, and was sick certain days.” “And I was astonished at the vision,” he says, “but none understood it.” { GC 325.1}​
Yet God had bidden His messenger: “Make this man to understand the vision.” That commission must be fulfilled. In obedience to it, the angel, some time afterward, returned to Daniel, saying: “I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding;” “therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision.” Daniel 8:27, 16; 9:22, 23, 25-27. There was one important point in the vision of chapter 8 which had been left unexplained, namely, that relating to time—the period of the 2300 days; therefore the angel, in resuming his explanation, dwells chiefly upon the subject of time: { GC 325.2}​
“Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy Holy City.... Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for Himself.... And He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week He shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” { GC 326.1}​
The angel had been sent to Daniel for the express purpose of explaining to him the point which he had failed to understand in the vision of the eighth chapter, the statement relative to time—“unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.” After bidding Daniel “understand the matter, and consider the vision,” the very first words of the angel are: “Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy Holy City.” The word here translated “determined” literally signifies “cut off.” Seventy weeks, representing 490 years, are declared by the angel to be cut off, as specially pertaining to the Jews. But from what were they cut off? As the 2300 days was the only period of time mentioned in chapter 8, it must be the period from which the seventy weeks were cut off; the seventy weeks must therefore be a part of the 2300 days, and the two periods must begin together. The seventy weeks were declared by the angel to date from the going forth of the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem. If the date of this commandment could be found, then the starting point for the great period of the 2300 days would be ascertained. { GC 326.2}​
In the seventh chapter of Ezra the decree is found. Verses 12-26. In its completest form it was issued by Artaxerxes, king of Persia, 457 B.C. But in Ezra 6:14 the house of the Lord at Jerusalem is said to have been built “according to the commandment [“decree,” margin] of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.” These three kings, in originating, reaffirming, and completing the decree, brought it to the perfection required by the prophecy to mark the beginning of the 2300 years. Taking 457 B.C., the time when the decree was completed, as the date of the commandment, every specification of the prophecy concerning the seventy weeks was seen to have been fulfilled. { GC 326.3}​
“From the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks”—namely, sixty-nine weeks, or 483 years. The decree of Artaxerxes went into effect in the autumn of 457 B.C. From this date, 483 years extend to the autumn of A.D. 27. (See Appendix.) At that time this prophecy was fulfilled. The word “Messiah” signifies “the Anointed One.” In the autumn of A.D. 27 Christ was baptized by John and received the anointing of the Spirit. The apostle Peter testifies that “God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power.” Acts 10:38. And the Saviour Himself declared: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He hath anointed Me to preach the gospel to the poor.” Luke 4:18. After His baptism He went into Galilee, “preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, The time is fulfilled.” Mark 1:14, 15. { GC 327.1}​
“And He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week.” The “week” here brought to view is the last one of the seventy; it is the last seven years of the period allotted especially to the Jews. During this time, extending from A.D. 27 to A.D. 34, Christ, at first in person and afterward by His disciples, extended the gospel invitation especially to the Jews. As the apostles went forth with the good tidings of the kingdom, the Saviour’s direction was: “Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Matthew 10:5, 6. { GC 327.2}​
“In the midst of the week He shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease.” In A.D. 31, three and a half years after His baptism, our Lord was crucified. With the great sacrifice offered upon Calvary, ended that system of offerings which for four thousand years had pointed forward to the Lamb of God. Type had met antitype, and all the sacrifices and oblations of the ceremonial system were there to cease. { GC 327.3}​
The seventy weeks, or 490 years, especially allotted to the Jews, ended, as we have seen, in A.D. 34. At that time, through the action of the Jewish Sanhedrin, the nation sealed its rejection of the gospel by the martyrdom of Stephen and the persecution of the followers of Christ. Then the message of salvation, no longer restricted to the chosen people, was given to the world. The disciples, forced by persecution to flee from Jerusalem, “went everywhere preaching the word.” “Philip went down to the city of Samaria, and preached Christ unto them.” Peter, divinely guided, opened the gospel to the centurion of Caesarea, the God-fearing Cornelius; and the ardent Paul, won to the faith of Christ, was commissioned to carry the glad tidings “far hence unto the Gentiles.” Acts 8:4, 5; 22:21. { GC 328.1}​
Thus far every specification of the prophecies is strikingly fulfilled, and the beginning of the seventy weeks is fixed beyond question at 457 B.C., and their expiration in A.D. 34. From this data there is no difficulty in finding the termination of the 2300 days. The seventy weeks—490 days—having been cut off from the 2300, there were 1810 days remaining. After the end of 490 days, the 1810 days were still to be fulfilled. From A.D. 34, 1810 years extend to 1844. Consequently the 2300 days of Daniel 8:14 terminate in 1844. At the expiration of this great prophetic period, upon the testimony of the angel of God, “the sanctuary shall be cleansed.” Thus the time of the cleansing of the sanctuary—which was almost universally believed to take place at the second advent—was definitely pointed out. { GC 328.2}​

It wasn't just William Miller who studied the time prophecies of Daniel. Adventist pioneers J. N. Andrews, Uriah Smith, and even James White wrote in great detail on the subject. Here are links to those PDF's.

The Sanctuary and Twenty-three Hundred Days, J. N. Andrews
The 2300 Days and the Sanctuary, Uriah Smith
The Sanctuary, the 2300 Days, and the Shut Door, James White
The Sanctuary and the Twenty-three Hundred Days of Daniel 8_14, Uriah Smith
 
Upvote 0