• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Last surviving cast member of the Honeymooners dies at 99.

Joyce Randolph who played Trixie on the Honeymooners has passed away. The last Honeymooners cast member to die was Art Carney and that was a little over 20 years ago. While not surprising given her advanced age, as a fan of the show I find it sad. Watching her interviews, she seemed like a nice person and hopefully lived a long and fruitful life. RIP.

I know we have some older members on this forum, I'm interested if any of you managed to watch the show as it first aired.

  • Prayers
Reactions: Chrystal-J

Liz Cheney vs Stefan Passantino: The Jan. 6 Committee Fraud


written by Newt Gingrich

It’s becoming increasingly clear that U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney was dishonest, manipulative, and destructive while serving on the Jan. 6 Committee.

A lawsuit filed by my friend and long-time attorney Stefan Passantino on Dec. 20, 2023 lays it out.

I know both participants well. I entered Congress in 1978 with Liz Cheney’s father, Dick Cheney. I watched Liz Cheney become a competent, effective implementor of American policy around the world. Few things have made me sadder than watching her drift into an anti-Trump fanaticism – which ultimately convinced her that breaking the rules, destroying innocent people, and pandering fake news were justified behaviors.

Years later, I got to know Stefan Passantino. Since 1998, he has been legal counsel for me and for our companies. He is a thoughtful, scholarly, and deeply ethical attorney. Passantino represents his clients with integrity and a passionate commitment to protecting them and seeing justice done.

I was proud of Passantino when he served as Deputy White House Counsel focusing on federal compliance and government ethics. We could not have imagined how he would later be smeared and lied about by Congresswoman Liz Cheney and the Jan. 6 Committee.

Liz Cheney and the committee’s ongoing process of dishonesty, violating attorney-client privilege, and leaking to friendly leftwing media was a total perversion of the congressional system. It was a dishonest effort to destroy innocent people of integrity with one-sided lies and smears.

Fortunately, Chairman Barry Loudermilk, who leads the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight (on which I served for over a decade), has doggedly looked into the Jan. 6 Committee’s lies and manipulations. In the coming months, we will be shocked at the stunning dishonesty Chairman Loudermilk will reveal.

Passantino represented several witnesses before the Jan. 6 Committee with no problems. He represented Cassidy Hutchinson with precisely the same integrity. In fact, he represented Hutchinson through multiple interviews covering about 20 hours.

Hutchinson was a desirable witness for the Committee, because she entered the White House in her early 20s and became Special Assistant to the President and Coordinator for Legislative Affairs. She reported to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and had an office in the West Wing just a few feet from the Oval Office.

Liz Cheney apparently decided Hutchinson would make a star witness – if only she would say the right things.

In an amazingly inappropriate and unethical move, Liz Cheney herself (along with a small number of senior staff) approached Hutchinson after her second committee interview without informing her Passantino. Liz Cheney then called Cassidy in for a third interview, with Passantino again serving as counsel, with neither Cassidy nor Cheney ever informing Passantino that they had been speaking without his knowledge. Contacting Hutchinson without informing Passantino was clearly unethical, and it appears as if Liz Cheney instructed Cassidy not to tell Passantino they had spoken. This was a profound breach of legal ethics. Liz Cheney knew this well. She earned her law degree from the University of Chicago.

As a senior member of Congress (and the national media’s anointed hero), Liz Cheney approached and sought to manipulate an isolated, frightened woman in her mid-20s. Does that sound appropriate? I suspect Liz Cheney knew she was doing something wrong because she apparently did not tell her fellow committee members.

After being manipulated by Cheney, Hutchinson dismissed Passantino and hired a new lawyer who was eager to cooperate with the committee. Suddenly, Hutchinson’s testimony started changing. As Chairman Loudermilk has said:

“Cassidy Hutchinson tried to explain her dramatic changes in testimony by blaming her initial lawyer, Stefan Passantino. Our discovery of Cassidy’s errata sheet showing just how substantially her story changed, raises serious concerns about her credibility. Until now, her version of the story was the only one.”

This article written by Newt Gingrich has more to it than what I am quoting here. Please go to the web link in order to read what else he wrote. This is some very interesting stuff there, in my opinion.

Trump back in court...again

Yeah, I'm losing track as well. This one is the defamation case against the woman he sexually assaulted - E. Jean Carroll. The defamation portion of the original case was held over as Trump was president, but is now due to be heard on Tuesday. From here: E. Jean Carroll is taking Trump to trial over defamation and sexual abuse. Again. Wait, what?

'US District Judge Lewis Kaplan...ruled that Trump doesn't get a re-do on Carroll's sexual abuse claims. Trump defamed Carroll, he ruled, and the jury's job is only to decide how much Trump owes in damages for the statements he made defaming Carroll while in the White House.

Carroll added additional claims to her lawsuit, too. After Trump lost the first trial, he called the case "rigged" and disparaged Carroll as a "whack job." Carroll's lawyers slapped additional defamation allegations into her lawsuit for those statements.'

And guess who she's bringing in as an expert witness to assess damages...Ashlee Humphries, who testified in the first trial. Hey, that name rings a bell...yep, you may remember her from another recent defamation case where she was an expert witness for damages in the defamation case against Giuliani. And he was pinged for...wait for it...$148 million.

Apparently this is only going to last a couple of days. There's nothing to decide except the dollar figure.
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay

Ohio pastor arraigned after being charged for housing homeless at church


An Ohio pastor was arraigned in municipal court on Thursday after being slapped with 18 zoning law violation charges related to keeping his church open around the clock to house the homeless.

Pastor Chris Avell, who pastors the nondenominational Dad's Place in Bryan, which is a town of around 8,400 people about 50 miles southwest of Toledo, pleaded not guilty to the charges, his attorney told The Christian Post.

“Yesterday, the city of Bryan, Ohio, arraigned Pastor Chris on criminal charges for having his church open 24/7," Jeremy Dys, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, told CP. "He pled 'not guilty,' as any pastor should who is simply doing what churches throughout history have done: care for those who walk through their doors no matter the time of day."

"We hope Mayor Carrie Schlade will drop all of these charges and begin talking with us about how Pastor Chris and Dad’s Place will continue to contribute to the wonderful community of Bryan," he added.

The Supreme Court's Historic Challenge: Saving American Democracy


Historians have an enormous advantage over the rest of us: they have the unique luxury of looking back through time and, with the power of hindsight, pinpointing the exact moment a new era began. Yet there are events that are so momentous, so crucial, and so obvious, that sometimes even those living in the moment can recognize their historic significance.

We are living through that moment.

Over the last several days, the turmoil surrounding the question of whether bureaucrats can unilaterally remove Donald Trump's name from a presidential campaign ballot has only intensified. Colorado and Maine have already taken this action and other states are mulling the same.

As observed in a previous essay by this author, these actions attack the very fabric of our representative form of government. The idea that without so much as due process unelected persons in an individual state can remove a potential presidential candidate is the stuff of nightmares for a democracy.

Even leading Democrats have voiced opposition to this latest con by "ballot bandits."

What this means, however, is that the future of our nation is now to the be in the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court.

To their credit, they have recognized this threat and their need to consider the arguments as a matter of urgency for, make no mistake, this is an existential threat to our nation.

Ban assault rifles!

If you are some paranoid person who feels that they need 30-round magazines to protect your family, you are exactly the person who shouldn't be allowed to have multiple 30-round mags lying around your house. It's been proven over and over that parents don't seem to be able to keep their psychopathic children from accessing their assault rifles. Ban them. Make them illegal so people can't legally purchase an assault rifle without the sense to keep their children from accessing them. When the Second Amendment was written we had one-shot muskets. I don't think that opens up the door for people to stock up on AR-15s and AK-47s. Get your hunting rifle. A 30.06 can blast a hole through anything that moves. A 6-shot .357 or .44 magnum can shoot down anyone who invades your home. Not to mention a 12-guage. What do you need 30 rounds for? Are you so afraid of everyday life that you can't sleep unless you can shoot 27 little babies in 4 minutes like at Sandyhook?

I just had to post this because I saw a Sandy Hook parent pleading for us to stop these atrocities. Get your 12 gauges, your hunting rifles, and your 6 shooters. Why do people feel like they need 90 or more high-power bullets to stop an intruder? Are we living in a Mad Max-type world where there is absolutely no law and order? Call 911 and blast a couple of shots if you have to but there is no need to grant the ability for some guy to shoot down a whole neighborhood or carelessly let their psycho child gain access to their assault rifle and take out a whole lunchroom of babies.


Save the children!

Russia: Orthodox priest faces expulsion for not asking God for Russian victory

Orthodox priest faces expulsion for not asking God for Russian victory. The Russian priest Alexei Uminsky is also known for his liberal position in wartime. He refused to read a prayer invoking a Russian victory in Ukraine. This now has consequences. The 63-year-old had encouraged believers to attend services that do not pray for the war. He is also no longer allowed to hold church services. With his actions, he had broken his priestly oath, the court ruling said. For his refusal to recite the victory prayer, Uminsky should be expelled from the priestly order.

  • Informative
Reactions: wing2000

Brenzian ubiquity

Lately I'm struggling to see how/why I should reject Brenz's view of Christology. How / why should I accept Chemnitz nuanced view that seems to be more Reformed than Lutheran. If Christ is not everywhere as in Pantheism/ Buddhism, then then Lutheran view makes no sense to me. The infinite must be within the finite or the metaphysics are the same as the Reformed. This got me studying Buddhism again even though I don't believe I can work for salvation, unlike Western logic they have 4 options, true, false, both, neither, so only in this Indian logical system can Lutheranism actually make sense (tetralemma, Catuskoti). This is where Vajrayana intersects with Lutherans in particular because only we have the unique ubiquity doctrine. JC Beall writes something related to this I think about other logical systems. I think Beall has interacted with Graham Priest who is a philosopher of more Buddhist type thought too; basically following Chemnitz is like following reason > faith again which is putting reason as the primary way to salvation, reasoning your way to faith, which is not very Lutheran. If "reasoning" is a work, then we are trying to use works to acquire salvation/nirvana ,the same as Tsongkhapa in Buddhism. Why not accept some contradictions even if it seems pantheistic?

Prayer Requests

Hello everyone,
Please pray for me regarding a situation where a group of people has been bullying and harassing me for years. Please pray that their behavior toward me will either stop or that God will allow me to move to a different environment where these people will no longer have access to me. I have tried to be silent in all this but I feel like I have no more patience to deal with the things that are being done to me. Pray that I will continue to be physically and mentally healthy in spite of the things that they are doing. Pray that I will be forgiving and will not hold on to bitterness, anger or resentment.

I struggle with those things since this has been going on for so long and, after everything that has been done to me, the police should have been involved long ago, but I did not involve them early on because I was afraid of retaliation. Now I have little evidence to prove how long these people have been harassing me and the lengths that they have gone to do so. I did finally contact the police a year or so ago but because of the lack of information I had, my submission to them was more for just documentation purposes than anything else. Now the harassment has become more covert so the chances of me gaining real evidence of it have become low. I live every day feeling unsafe in my own skin now and I struggle with being so angry that (in my eyes) these people have "gotten away" with everything that they have done to me and since the police are not actively involved, I don't feel protected.

Unrelated prayer requests:
- Please pray for missionaries around the world, for their safety and also that their work would be fruitful.
- Please pray that my family members would come to know Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior and that they would have personal relationships with Him.
- Pray that I would be successful and able to submit classwork on time as a new semester in college starts and that I would be able to obtain my degree and possibly graduate early if an opportunity arises.
- Pray for lost people - people living dangerous or criminal lifestyles and those living compromising lives because of greed or a love of money.
- Pray for countries at war or in conflict around the world and those affected.
- Pray for the Jewish community around the world.

Thank you.

Republican isolationism & a perfect storm of troubles

A perfect storm of troubles is brewing and an unprecedented collaboration of Western rivals.

1) IRAN - backs the trade war being waged by the Houthis against trade going through the Red Sea and Suez Canal.
It also backs Hamas whose contribution to the "Resistance" to Western hegemony is to destroy their reputation with the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Hezbollah appears absent from any strategic plan at the moment, though watch this space.

2) CHINA - The election of a pro-sovereignty candidate in Taiwan could mean that war with China has now become more rather than less likely.

3) RUSSIA - Russian dreams of restoring imperial or soviet boundaries hinge on victory in Ukraine. The war has become one of attrition and remains crucially dependent on American support.

This is time for wise, strong leaders who persist in doing what is right and crucially require the following:

1) A commitment to support Ukraine.
2) Keeping trade flowing past Yemen and in the straits of Hormuz
3) Security guarantees to Taiwan
4) A moderated support with Israel that allows them to destroy Hamas while minimizing the humanitarian cost of that
5) A continued commitment of the USA to Article 5 of the NATO Treaty. Once countries like Japan do not believe America would defend them they are more likely to develop their nuclear weapons and a general proliferation of possession and risk is more likely.

The biggest threat to world peace and security right now is Republican isolationism. If Trump wins in 2024 that is most likely to lead to:

1) Ukrainian defeat and the advance of Russia to the Carpathians
2) American indifference to an invasion of Taiwan
3) The end of NATO and a big increase in world instability. More wars and greater economic instability.
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster

US did not properly track more than $1 billion worth of weapons sent to Ukraine

CNN

US did not properly track more than $1 billion worth of weapons sent to Ukraine, watchdog report finds​

Story by By Haley Britzky and Natasha Bertrand, CNN • 2d
1705217409475.png

The Pentagon did not properly track $1 billion worth of military equipment sent to Ukraine, according to a watchdog report released on Thursday.

The report from the Pentagon Inspector General says that while the Defense Department has improved its ability to track military aid sent to Ukraine, it “did not fully comply” with requirements and much of the equipment sent is “delinquent,” meaning it’s not possible to complete an inventory of everything sent.

Pro-Palestinian Protesters Swarm White House Fence, Secret Service Deployed


Please be aware that there are some swear words in that article because of words quoted by those protestors.
  • Informative
Reactions: Danthemailman

Controlled by the holy spirit..

I read something and it had the phrase 'under the control' of the holy spirit.
It seems a Christian has the Holy Spirit living in them, but if they are obedient to the promoting of the Spirit, then they are under its control.
It's like you choose to be under its control, but there seems to be a shift in your experience when you do that... gifts? bliss?

Could anybody comment on how it is to live with the holy spirit, and being obedient to it?

Russia Targets Ukraine With Large-Scale Missile Attack, Saturday Jan 13, 2024

New York Times

Russia Targets Ukraine With Large-Scale Missile Attack​

Jan 13, 2024

The assault was in line with a wider air campaign that Russia began in late December, seeking to wear down Ukrainian air defenses.

Russia attacked Ukraine with several waves of missiles on Saturday morning, the Ukrainian and Russian militaries said, putting the entire country under an air-raid alert and sending people rushing for shelter as bangs were heard in several cities.

The attack, which started around 5 a.m. local time and lasted about three hours, involved nearly 40 cruise and hypersonic missiles fired from different regions, including the Russian-occupied peninsula of Crimea and the Caspian Sea, to the southeast of Ukraine. They were directed at cities including Kyiv, the capital, and Lviv, near the border with Poland.

It followed Russia’s recent strategy for large-scale air assaults: waves of different types of aerial weapons launched almost simultaneously from multiple locations and aimed at various targets, with the goal of overwhelming Ukrainian air defenses.

Army Sees Sharp Decline in White Recruits



There's a lot of information and also analysis within this article. What are y'alls opinions regarding this topic and that analysis?
  • Informative
Reactions: Danthemailman

123 people arrested in human trafficking sting in Florida, including a nurse and teacher


Pedophiles are truly disgusting. They all should be locked up in prison for the maximum amount of sentence possible by law if they are found guilty by a trial jury.

Empty threats?

I shouldn't be afraid of an old man on a walker but the other day my dad told me that he would do whatever he could to stop me from going to church and talking to other Christians. It may easier for you to say to "just stand up" or "don't let it get to you" but it affects me differently. I don't think the threats are mortal of course, but I still don't know if he's trying to (or can) conjure up ways to stop me from being able to go to church and talking to other Christians.

Mutation Rates Argument

Vox Day claims to have mathematically shown that "evolution is impossible". His argument appears to be that simple math shows that there isn't enough time to account for the genetic differences between humans and chimpanzees.

The argument looks badly flawed to me, but I am not a biologist and am likely missing or misunderstanding some things. My question is if I have correctly identified problems or if I am getting things wrong myself.

The JFG-VD Debate - Vox Popoli
We’re told that they [humans and Chimpanzees] are 98% identical in terms of DNA. So that would imply that there are sixty million different base pairs, which would tell us, because it’s two different paths, we’re talking each – they both have thirty million mutations since the common ancestor. And that’s kind of close to that other number, with the thirty-five million plus the five million.

First, is he confusing the number of base-pair differences with the number of fixed mutations that must have occurred? As I understand this, a single mutation can change many base pairs. It appears that throughout the rest of his argument, when he says "fixed mutations", he is really talking about fixed base-pair changes.

Maximal mutations - Vox Popoli

He averages several estimates the time since the Chimpanzee-Human Last Common Ancestor (CHLCA) to get 9 million years. Using twenty years per generation, he calculates that there have been 450,000 chimp and human generations since the CHLCA. He then uses an average rate of 1600 generations per "mutation" (single base-pair change) to conclude that there could only be at most 562 "total fixed mutations" in this time (the 125 figure appears to be from using 4 million instead of 9 million years). His justification for using the 1600 rate doesn't make much sense to me.

He is citing a Nature article that I don't have access to:
Human mutation rate revealed - Nature

Source: Sequencing of 19 whole genomes detected 25 mutations that were fixed in the 40,000 generations of the experiment.
NATURE, 2009

Biologists REALLY Don't Get Math - Vox Popoli
What JFG is claiming in his clarification is that because sexual reproduction CAN result in faster gene fixation than bacterial cloning when measured in terms of generations, it is possible for the fixation rate to be high enough to account for genetic divergence between chimps and humans since the LCHCA, as well as every other observed genetic divergence over time.

However, this is not true. What JFG and his followers forgot to take into account is that it is not generations that are relevant here, but time. And although bacterial cloning may – or may not – be slower to fixate a gene across a population than sexual reproduction in generational terms, bacteria also have considerably more generations over a given period of time than humans do.
I used the bacterial model in order to demonstrate that the case for natural selection was impossible even when applying the fastest possible fixation rates ever observed.

This is 1600 generations per "mutation". How does the number of generations that bacteria have factor into this number that is supposedly being very generous? He is trying to justify using the rate ("generations per fixed mutation") of bacteria for humans and chimpanzees because he claims it is faster due to bacteria having many more generations for a given period of time, but then uses 20 years per generation to calculate the "maximum fixed mutations". Am I missing something or does this just not make any sense?

Also, is 1600 "generations per fixed mutation" way too slow of an estimate of this rate for humans and chimpanzees since they reproduce sexually and have a much larger genome than bacteria?

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,871,418
Messages
65,300,126
Members
275,930
Latest member
ken.jacobsen