- Dec 13, 2015
- 5,293
- 4,275
- 38
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
Abortion became legal in 1973 and the second wave of feminism (Where women got all of their "rights") happened between the early 60's through the late 70's.
Now wait a second, if abortion became legal right around the middle of the second wave of feminism, isn't feminism essentially to blame for abortion becoming legalized in the first place?
I know many feminists in here would disagree with me or women who think men like me are sexist and misogynistic pigs but actually think about it for a second. What's the defense of "Pro choicers" over the years? They say that a woman should have the right to kill her own baby and basically be able to play God. Why? Why should you have the right to murder your own child just because you couldn't keep your legs closed until marriage? (which is a large chunk of abortions) and you didn't want to follow or obey God and wait until marriage to have sex? In which case, virtually no babies would ever have to die, you would NEVER contract an STD if you and your husband remained loyal to each other and were virgins when you got married, and all of these premarital problems would just go away. But, I know. Those raging teenage hormones are just a pain right? Plus all the peer pressure into having sex...etc. I admit it, I didn't wait until I was married either. I was a man who had needs and wanted to bring a baby into the world. But, the thing is my wife and I mostly just fooled around. Neither of us lost our virginity per se until a few months after we were married.
But anyway premarital sex, I'm not just talking about the mother either, the father still is 50% responsible for this "unwanted" baby to be born. The father is just as responsible for "not closing his legs" as the mother is. Yet regardless of this, because of abortion and a "woman's right to choose" the father has no right or say in whether or not he doesn't want his child to be murdered or not. Yup, equal rights my buttocks. A Father's right to want to save his own child's life who by the laws of nature is half his, is completely thrown out the window and is non existent. Don't believe me? Here's a video example of such a case that went viral last year in a NY Abortion clinic:
[video]
Scroll to 1:02 for the video. The REALLY sad part is despite the fathers desperate attempts to save the life of his child, his child was murdered anyway.
I know many Christians in here would agree that THAT (and abortion in general) is wrong and abortion never should have been legalized. But, it was women's rights that started the whole damn problem. Then the problem became even worse, it started as "Let's kill an embryo who wouldn't feel a thing to let's kill a FULL TERM AND LIVING AND BREATHING BABY!"
This New York state law that passed last year got me SO sick to my stomach. It's bad enough that pro abortionists were able to use the defense "The baby isn't a baby yet and wouldn't know what hit it" to the now defense to "Who gives a crap if it's a living and breathing baby? I still don't want it."
How... sick and twisted can these pro abortion feminists be? Don't get me started on how they've lost God (I've posted my views on that before and besides this thread is specifically about abortion and the womens "rights" that brought this evil law into the world) but you'd have to be pretty sick in the head to want to murder your child who is fully grown!!!
I mean, I'm sorry but that's seriously just the most screwed up thing I have EVER heard in my life even before I became a Christian. Next thing you know it'll be legal to kill your husband because you don't want him around anymore. Only it'll be done like he's on death row and people just give him a lethal injection to make it "legal" and "painless" and he'll never feel or know a thing. Because, he never loved you, right? Or what about a womans right to "abort" her 1-6 month old child because she doesn't want him or want him around anymore? Again, lethal injection to make it not "objectionable or immoral". Because lets face it if you shoot your baby with a shotgun that's immoral right? What's the difference between shooting your child with a shotgun and aborting him when he's a full term baby? If you shot him with a shotgun odds are he wouldn't feel a thing either. Especially if you... okay this topic is getting graphic enough... I think I've made my point.
I mean, the way the world is going and the way women's rights are going, it honestly wouldn't surprise me...
Now wait a second, if abortion became legal right around the middle of the second wave of feminism, isn't feminism essentially to blame for abortion becoming legalized in the first place?
I know many feminists in here would disagree with me or women who think men like me are sexist and misogynistic pigs but actually think about it for a second. What's the defense of "Pro choicers" over the years? They say that a woman should have the right to kill her own baby and basically be able to play God. Why? Why should you have the right to murder your own child just because you couldn't keep your legs closed until marriage? (which is a large chunk of abortions) and you didn't want to follow or obey God and wait until marriage to have sex? In which case, virtually no babies would ever have to die, you would NEVER contract an STD if you and your husband remained loyal to each other and were virgins when you got married, and all of these premarital problems would just go away. But, I know. Those raging teenage hormones are just a pain right? Plus all the peer pressure into having sex...etc. I admit it, I didn't wait until I was married either. I was a man who had needs and wanted to bring a baby into the world. But, the thing is my wife and I mostly just fooled around. Neither of us lost our virginity per se until a few months after we were married.
But anyway premarital sex, I'm not just talking about the mother either, the father still is 50% responsible for this "unwanted" baby to be born. The father is just as responsible for "not closing his legs" as the mother is. Yet regardless of this, because of abortion and a "woman's right to choose" the father has no right or say in whether or not he doesn't want his child to be murdered or not. Yup, equal rights my buttocks. A Father's right to want to save his own child's life who by the laws of nature is half his, is completely thrown out the window and is non existent. Don't believe me? Here's a video example of such a case that went viral last year in a NY Abortion clinic:
[video]
Scroll to 1:02 for the video. The REALLY sad part is despite the fathers desperate attempts to save the life of his child, his child was murdered anyway.
I know many Christians in here would agree that THAT (and abortion in general) is wrong and abortion never should have been legalized. But, it was women's rights that started the whole damn problem. Then the problem became even worse, it started as "Let's kill an embryo who wouldn't feel a thing to let's kill a FULL TERM AND LIVING AND BREATHING BABY!"
This New York state law that passed last year got me SO sick to my stomach. It's bad enough that pro abortionists were able to use the defense "The baby isn't a baby yet and wouldn't know what hit it" to the now defense to "Who gives a crap if it's a living and breathing baby? I still don't want it."
How... sick and twisted can these pro abortion feminists be? Don't get me started on how they've lost God (I've posted my views on that before and besides this thread is specifically about abortion and the womens "rights" that brought this evil law into the world) but you'd have to be pretty sick in the head to want to murder your child who is fully grown!!!
I mean, I'm sorry but that's seriously just the most screwed up thing I have EVER heard in my life even before I became a Christian. Next thing you know it'll be legal to kill your husband because you don't want him around anymore. Only it'll be done like he's on death row and people just give him a lethal injection to make it "legal" and "painless" and he'll never feel or know a thing. Because, he never loved you, right? Or what about a womans right to "abort" her 1-6 month old child because she doesn't want him or want him around anymore? Again, lethal injection to make it not "objectionable or immoral". Because lets face it if you shoot your baby with a shotgun that's immoral right? What's the difference between shooting your child with a shotgun and aborting him when he's a full term baby? If you shot him with a shotgun odds are he wouldn't feel a thing either. Especially if you... okay this topic is getting graphic enough... I think I've made my point.
I mean, the way the world is going and the way women's rights are going, it honestly wouldn't surprise me...
Last edited: