Idk what social circumstances is about.
Heh. "verbal abuse". That would be hilarious if it had resulted in a fatality...
One person's report after-effect reaction to the covid vaccine was to move into the High Income bracket... That's pretty cool...
2 people picked up smoking and apparently think it had something to do with being vaccinated?
1 person became illiterate... Reading Rainbow might fix that one.
Bedridden, Immobile, Sight Disability are considerably less funny (not funny at all), but a little hard to determine if these were pre-existing or coming anyway to the person who took the vaccine vs "this came out of the blue" shortly after taking it. Many of the (I think 11 million recipiants so far in UK?) would have started with older population w pre-existing conditions.
I feel like you kind of have to do a deep dive to really get a feel for the population that was getting the vaccine, the number of people involved vs the reported "Yellow Card" reactions which seem to be followup surveys of "are you experiencing any of these things" shortly after getting vaccine.
I do take issue with the article headlining all these things as "reported injuries" vs "reported post vaccine condition changes" or "yellow card reaction reports". The reporting system (I think) is built to cast a wide net so that if a large # of adverse reactions are being reported they can take a look and do a recall effectively. But it's probably catching a lot of things that were pre-existing, or evolving on the way as well as any legitimate "this was possibly my body's sudden reaction to this vaccine" reports.
At the end of the report for this one vaccine that I linked to, you can see this
which also lets you know that when the article says "330,063 Reported Injured", it's not even individual people; it's individual reported possible post vaccine reactions and/or events. So if I report "headache, skin rash, diarreha" that went away 3 days after taking the vaccine, in that article it would show up as "3 report injuries", which is completely misleading. Editor should be fired imho. I don't like to be misled, no one does.
I'd have to take a deeper dive into what the reporting criteria actually are and who is making the reports, but that's my feeling. Deep dives are always helpful for getting an accurate view of the situation, and they can be funny too. At any rate, I learned a bit more today, thank you for spurring me to do so.